Foxhounds of the 21st Century and Raptors: Different Purpose and Similar Destiny. What is the similarity of the epochal machines?

28


The prototype of the MiG-16 long-range high-altitude fighter-interceptor - E-1975MP (board "31"), which first took off on September 155, 831, received all the constructive and conceptual "roots" of the well-known and unique 3-fly MiG- interceptor fighter 25PD. “Put on the wing” by the recognized pilot-ace of the USSR Alexander Vasilievich Fedotov, the MiG-31 embodied all the best flight-technical qualities of its ancestor MiG-25, and also received a modernization base, which allowed in the near future to rank the car as the 4th generation tactical aviation, and then to the category of the most advanced heavy interceptors of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. This magnificent machine was created at the very height of the Cold War, when the northern strategic airspace of the Soviet Union was continually violated by the American strategic intelligence agents SR-71A "Blackbird", and armed with surface ships and submarines of the Navy fleet The United States received strategic cruise missiles RGM / UGM-109A / B / C Block I / II / IIA Tomahawk. MiG-25PD / PDM, with their obsolete airborne radars Smerch-2A and Sapfir-25, could no longer realize the early detection and interception of small-sized Tomahawks; Also, the MiG-25PD missile armament began to lag behind Western models. The air-to-air missiles R-40P and R-40T had a maximum speed of attacked targets of the order of 835 m / s, which was absolutely insufficient to intercept the SR-71A Blackbird even at short distances. The standard operating speed of the latter usually approached 900 m / s.



The first serial modification of the MiG-31 was fully prepared for this. For the first time in the Soviet practice of military aircraft manufacturing, an on-board radar with a passive phased antenna array РП-31 Н007 "Barrier" was installed on a machine of this class. Targets with 2 m2 EPR were detected at a distance of 120 — 140 km. In addition, Zaslon is capable of simultaneously capturing 4 air targets and firing them with high-speed X-NUMX-swing missiles R-4,5. The capabilities of this missile in the fight against long-range high-speed maneuvering targets increased approximately 33-5 times in comparison with the P-6Р. So, G-limit overload goal for P-40 is 33 units. (for Р-8Р - total 40-2,5 units), plus to everything - the flight distance increased from 3 to 60 and more than kilometers. Due to equipping the MiG-120 with a network-centric complex for the exchange of tactical information about the air situation of the ADF-31 (it allows data exchange with other MiG-518, MiG-31 and Su-29 family vehicles, as well as DRLO A-27 aircraft at a distance of 50 km), cockpit received co-pilot systems. Later, a more advanced modification of the MiG-200B.

The MiG-31B multipurpose interceptor fighter began to be developed around the 1985 year. The main requirement for the updated car was an increase in the range characteristics, as well as the modernization of the elemental base of the radar "Barrier". The last point was facilitated by the incident with the agent of the Western special services Adolph Tolkachev, who provided the Western European and overseas “friends” with technical documentation on both the MiG-31 and the MiG-29А. The first point (increase in range) was due to the need for long-distance patrols of the air spaces of the Arctic region, as well as the escort of anti-submarine naval aircraft. The MiG-31, retrofitted with a barbell in the air, were called “Item 01D3”. There were also transitional versions of the MiG-31BS (“product 01BS”): only the avionics were upgraded here, but the refueling bar was not installed.

The final serial modification was the MiG-31B ("Item 01B"). This machine has received the full update package used in the 01-3 and 01BS modifications. In addition to the L-shaped refueling bar, the interceptor received an improved Zaslon-A radar with identical power indicators, but higher noise immunity and computational tools. Mass production of these machines began at the end of 90 year.

Traditionally, multipurpose heavy fighter-interceptors of the MiG-31 family are usually compared with the American carrier-based fighter interceptors F-14A "Tomcat" and F-14D "Super Tomcat". The bully cats that entered service in the 1974 year have the most similar combat characteristics with our Foxhound, including the range of the AN / AWG-9 and AN / APG-71 airborne radars and the AIM air-to-air missile radius of operation. -54B / C Phoenix. But the combat career of the Tomcats, due to the advent of the more modern Super Hornets and, due to the stupidity of the US Navy command, was completed on 22 of September 2006 of the year, the fleet lost its speediest stories multipurpose deck machine, replacing it with slow F-35B / C and F / A-18E / F, making a choice in favor of greater maneuverability and ease of maintenance. And therefore, the comparison today is not quite logical to do.

More relevant may be the comparison of the deficient MiG-31B / BM family with the American F-22A "Raptor". Many may speak far not in favor of this comparison, because the machines are completely different in purpose, but there is no doubt that some characteristics and features of combat use unite them.

Designed to replace the 4th generation F-15C "Eagle" air superiority fighters, as well as the more feature-rich tactical fighters of the "4 ++" generation F-15E "Strike Eagle", the F-22A was blessed with the most advanced year with the design features of the airframe in terms of reducing the radar signature, the best in terms of thrust-to-weight ratio of the Pratt & Whitney F1990-PW-119 TRDDF with OVT mode, as well as the most advanced avionics. Being the first tactical carrier of the AN / APG-100 onboard radar with active HEADLIGHTS in the US Air Force, the Raptor, although it did not outstrip the MiG-77 in terms of equipping with modern HEADLIGHTS radars, received the best-of-its-kind radar, which for more than 31 years, TTX, firmly holds positions between the station N10 "Belka" (installed on the T-036 PAK FA) and the N50M "Bars", known in the armament of the su-011SM super-maneuverable multipurpose fighters. More often, the F-30A is compared with such advanced transitional generation vehicles as the Su-22S, or the stealthy 35th generation T-5 PAK FA fighter, but the emphasis in these machines is placed on the versatility of the tasks performed, which include gaining air superiority. and the breakthrough of enemy air defense or strike missions.

"Raptor", by contrast, is more often used as an aviation complex to gain air supremacy. So, over the territory of Syria, the Americans use this car to protect the friendly forces of the so-called “moderate opposition”, and during the air operation “Odyssey. Dawn "F-22A is usually used for reconnaissance purposes and to provide a no-fly zone in Libyan airspace. The first baptism "Raptor" occurred in the Syrian company, where the machines of this type were first used to inflict pinpoint attacks on the infrastructure of ISIL in Syria. The most common air-to-ground armament for the Raptor is that GBU-32 JDAM guided bombs and small so-called “narrow bombs” of the GBU-39 SDB and GBU-53 / B SDB-II class continue to remain. The latest versions of SDB (“Small Diameter Bomb”) have the highest accuracy (CWO up to 5 m) and low radar visibility in 0,01 м2, due to which a breakthrough air defense can be achieved even by more or less modern air defense systems of the Buk-М1 or С-300ПС type with exact defeat of the covered purpose. But this weapon, integrated into the Raptor SUV, cannot make the F-22A a worthy attack aircraft complex of the 21st century.

Firstly, the range of these UAB usually does not exceed 120 km when starting from a height of 10 — 12 km. Secondly, bombs suited to the target at a low subsonic speed that does not create absolutely no difficulties to capture the most perfect troop ZRSK like "Thor M2E», «shell-S1" and long-range air defense missile systems such as the C-300PM1, C-300V4 and C -400 "Triumph". At the same time, we have not heard about development of specialized versions of the PLLR AGM-88 HARM with folding rudders, AGM-84H SLAM-ER tactical missiles and other advanced WTO for Raptor. For this reason, we conclude: the appointment of the F-22A will continue to fight with the near and far air enemy.

While over the course of the 15 years, the F-22A gradually went through various preparatory technological stages and was approaching the acquisition of initial combat readiness, our MiG-31B did not stand still either. Mikoyan, applying technological developments, previously prepared for introduction into the modification of the MiG-31M, in 1997 year began to develop another, more inexpensive version of the machine, the MiG-31BM, which today quite rightly applies to the generation of "4 +". Let me remind you that the first crown of joint engineering thought of the OKB MiG, OKB-19 them. Pavel A. Solovyov and the Leninets NGO, the MiG-31M, did not get into service with the Russian Air Force at the beginning of the 90s due to the lack of adequate allocations from the Russian leadership due to the crisis economic situation in the country that broke out during adjustment.

The car was supposed to get a promising airborne radar with a PFAR "Zaslon-M" with increased energy potential, as well as throughput and target channelity (24 accompanied targets and 6 captured). The detection range for typical targets was exactly 2 times as large as the first version of Barrier (400 km versus 200 km). Due to the installation of a more advanced avionics (new radar and EW containers at the wing tips), as well as increased fuel system capacity by 1500, the empty mass of the MiG-31М was 2355 kg (11%) more than in the early MiG-31, therefore, the 2,4 m2 received a large wing area on the 31, as well as aerodynamic flows at the root of the wing in order to compensate for the loss of stability that appeared after increasing the central fuel tank in the MiG-31M gargrote. The number of suspension points of the MiG-8 increased from 10 to 7560, and the mass of the combat load from 10000 to XNUMX kg.

The updated Zaslon-M radar made it possible to use P-33С and Р-37 guided air-to-air missiles in ultra-long air combat to intercept small hypersonic (including aeroballistic) air assault weapons, as well as medium / long-range air combat missiles RVV-AE / -PD families (Р-77) for the destruction of highly maneuverable aerodynamic targets, anti-aircraft, cruise and other aircraft missiles. The high combat qualities of the vehicle were demonstrated in 1994, when one of the remaining 6 prototypes of the interceptor intercepted the training target at a distance of 300 km: all the achievements of the American deck of the Tomcat-Phoenix were completely deflected.

Similar qualities have been endowed with modern MiG-31BM. Despite the fact that “BMKs” are advanced versions of the MiG-31B in terms of electronic “stuffing”, and retained the same aerodynamics and airframe with a standard wing area, the new equipment gave the multipurpose interceptor the previously unthinkable capabilities to combat a wide range of ground and surface targets.

The combat load of the MiG-31BM is 9000 kg (just 1 a ton less than the MiG-31М provided), but a huge list of used missile-bomb armaments appeared, which was not available on previous versions of the MiG-31, and which is much wider than on one of the most advanced versions of Raptor - F-22A Block 35 Increments 3.2 / 3.3. This list includes: tactical missiles with television and semi-active laser seeker X-29T / L, X-31P long-range anti-radar missiles and X-31AD supersonic anti-ship missiles (59 range) developed on their basis. km), guided bombs KAB-285 and other modern WTO. This weaponry turns the MiG-500BM into a real “killer” of the enemy’s land and sea air defense: as far as we know, not a single modern tactical fighter-carrier of anti-radar and anti-ship missiles has the ability to approach the target at 31 — 2,4 speed with weapons on hangers, but the updated “ Thirty-first will do it without difficulty, plus, at the same time, it will repel the attack of an air enemy at a distance of up to 2,6 km with the latest P-280 or RVV-BD missiles. "Raptors", for example, even with all its versatility, can not boast of such unique characteristics of conducting long-range air combat with simultaneous work "on the ground." All this was achieved through the use of a fundamentally new weapons control system (CWS) Zaslon-AM, for the management of which we developed a high-performance BCG Baget-37.

As you can see, historically, two machines of different generations (MiG-31BM and F-22A), of different classes and with differing tactical and technical characteristics, have a very similar fate. The initially planned huge series of “Raptors”, due to economic problems and investments in programs such as JSF (F-35A / B / C), was gradually reduced in just a dozen years to 187 front-line machines, which is why rarely use them in various theaters, leaving them on the “darkest day”; Also, the Raptors are rarely used in percussion operations, despite the possibilities of working on ground targets, shouldering them on the shoulders of the Super Hornets and Strike Needles pilots. A similar situation is observed with our MiG-31B / BM.

In July of this year, the US congressmen, relying on disappointing forecasts for the cost of the deck versions of F-35B / C, as well as on confirmed data on low LTH F-35A, quite seriously began to think about restarting the production capacity of F-22A and upgrading armed 187 fighter. After all, more or less sensible heads at the Pentagon and the Defense Ministry understand that the Lightnings are inferior to the Raptors and the Russian super-maneuverable Su-30M and Su-35С fighters in terms of achieving superiority; on the F-35A alone, the protection of the NORAD air defense identification zone cannot be constructed. However, the “reset” of serial production of the F-22A, firstly, will require additional considerable financial injections, and secondly, it no longer has the relevance that was in the first decade of the 21st century. So, for example, a smaller amount of internal weapons compartments of the F-22A does not allow in low-profile mode to take on more 2 guided bombs weighing more than 467 kg (GBU-32), F-35A and C can take 4 bombs of similar caliber and 2 UAB caliber 900 kg. The only exception is the low-visibility deck fighter with a short take-off and vertical landing of the F-35B, where part of the volume of the internal weapon compartments is occupied by an air intake and a nacelle with a lifting fan.

“Raptor”, however, to expand the nomenclature of attack missile-bomb armament, will require the use of external underwing suspensions, which will lead to the loss of the stealth mode. This perspective does not suit the Americans at all, because it completely contradicts the concept of their air force, where priority is given to subtle, fast and powerful strike operations.

As for the MiG-31BM, its assembly line has also recently been considered to restart. And it was not suggested by a simple Internet browser or blogger, but by Deputy Prime Minister of Russia Dmitry Rogozin. It was not by chance that after exactly 20 years, an opinion was expressed about the possible resumption of the MiG-31BM: the car is really ready for the shock operations of the new century and air battles at extreme ranges, at which other fighters only discover each other. But in the end they decided to stop only at upgrading existing machines to the level of the MiG-31BM. There are several reasons for this: this is a large radar signature of the airframe (EPR around 10 m2), and low maneuverability, which does not allow melee air combat, and just a huge infrared signature, which can be seen at a distance of a couple of hundred kilometers using an infrared optical-electronic channel AN / AAQ-37 DAS and AAQ-40 (CCD-TV) systems installed on the F-35A. Nevertheless, the cars will serve in the Russian Aerospace Forces for at least another ten years, since there are some unspecified at the beginning of the quality review - the ability to fly at supersonic cruising speeds up to 2250 km / h (with ultra long RV 37 X-VUMV 4). interception of stratospheric targets at speeds up to 6500-7000 km / h; use as a high-speed, super-operational DRLOU aircraft for other tactical aircraft. In these tasks, our MiG-31BM and with the Raptors can.

The VKS of Russia is armed with 150 MiG-31B / BM / BCM, 113 of which will be upgraded to versions BM / BCM with the capacities of OAO Nizhny Novgorod Aircraft Building Plant Sokol. It is very difficult to say whether this amount is enough or not. But given that the link of these multi-purpose interceptors can keep under control a segment of air space longer than 1000 km, even a quarter of the MiG-31BM fleet is enough to hold strategic air directions both in the Far East and in the European theaters of operations. Overtaking a target with an afterburner turned off, these interceptors can be 1,15 times faster than Raptors, which is why an 150 machine can be considered an ample number. And let's not forget about the "Thirty First", which are in service with the Air Defense Forces of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Some of the Kazakh MiGs are also being upgraded, and will eventually become a reliable aerospace "shield" on the southern air route of the CSTO, in addition to the C-300PS anti-aircraft missile systems recently transferred to the Union Republic.



With the "Raptors" in the US Air Force everything is much harder. Given their aggressive military-political activities, the entire 187 of airplanes has to be distributed both for the defense of the air borders of the North American continent and for participation in hostilities and reconnaissance operations in the APR, in the Middle East and in Europe. In conclusion, it is worth noting: both our and American machines, despite their conceptual differences, can be put on a single “step” in terms of relevance to the Air Force, the number in service and the range of operations carried out on both sides of the barricades. Their full combat potential will be revealed only during the global military escalation, which will require the use of all types of military-political instruments.

Sources of information:
http://forum.militaryparitet.com/viewtopic.php?id=10593
http://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/3701281
http://www.airwar.ru/enc/fighter/f22.html
http://paralay.com/mig31m.html
28 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    25 October 2016 15: 36
    An interesting article - "plus" to the author for the comparison.

    I hope that all the same there will not be their full-time fights in the border and border sections of the airspace ...
    1. +3
      25 October 2016 20: 54
      Quote: Titsen
      An interesting article - "plus" to the author for the comparison.

      So for sure, the author is well done that he decided to compare.
      However, I have certain complaints about the content of the article.
      For the first time in the Soviet practice of military aircraft construction, an aircraft of this class was equipped with an airborne radar station with a passive phased antenna array

      So, N007 “Barrier” is not only the first on-board radar with a headlamp in domestic practice, but also the first on-board headlamp of a fighter in world practice. But there really is something to be proud of.
      not a single modern tactical fighter carrier anti-radar and anti-ship missiles has the ability to approach the target at a speed of 2,4-2,6M with weapons on suspensions

      This is just a masterpiece statement. A radio-contrast, high-altitude, high-speed target will be detected long before the launch of the missiles (and the enemy will immediately take countermeasures). MiG-31 will fly not above sea level at a speed of 2,4-2,6M. Thus, there is no question of any guaranteed breakthrough of the air defense / missile defense.

      I’ll add from myself that I consider the most rational direction of the MiG-31 modernization to be the creation of explosive missiles with ARGSN capable of independently capturing a target at long distances. The benefit of the MiG-31 is not constrained by such a concept as the size of the internal weapons compartment.
  2. +3
    25 October 2016 16: 09
    Pure interceptor and fighter for air superiority.
    1. +4
      25 October 2016 16: 40
      I agree. He would still lower his visibility, but this would require a more significant modernization associated with the use of composites at least. And so the device is first-class, 9 tons of weapons pulls! Wow so fighter!
      1. +3
        25 October 2016 19: 14
        I am much more impressed by his ability to fly at speeds over 2M with a full set of weapons (unless, of course, the author is not mistaken). As for stealth, as I understand it, he doesn't really need it, given his capabilities. He still "sees", even "stealth", at least no later than he does, and can attack him from a greater distance, and the characteristics of our air combat missiles are traditionally significantly superior to their Western counterparts.
        1. 0
          26 October 2016 10: 57
          Quote: Sevastiec
          I am much more fascinated by his ability to fly at speeds over 2M

          The only question is how long does it take to fly? smile There is no flight manual for the MiG-31 in open sources. But there is the Airplane Flight Manual and "Practical Aerodynamics" which are almost similar in temperature loads to the MiG-25 airframe. And it says that with external suspensions, a speed M of more than 2,35 is allowed to be maintained for no more than 15 minutes. Without suspensions, the limiting values ​​will be M = 2,65 for no more than 15 minutes, and M = 2,85 for no more than 5 minutes. For the MiG-31, these limits are most likely the same.
          The MiG-31 is unique in the first place because it is the only mass-produced aircraft in the world operated by ordinary combat pilots and the ability to crawl out at least briefly at speeds higher than 2 M. But, in reality, an aircraft capable of flying at such speeds for a long time without consequences is SR -71. But this is a highly specialized aircraft, piece production, simple pilots not available.
      2. +5
        25 October 2016 20: 24
        Quote: uskrabut
        He would still lower the visibility

        Why lower the visibility of a high-altitude interceptor, whose destiny is to work on afterburner. In addition, the destiny of the interceptor to work not in stealth mode with external target designation, but independently scan the airspace.
        With the radar turned on, a decrease in the EPR will not particularly affect stealth.
        Next, you write:
        Quote: uskrabut
        this will require more significant modernization associated with the use of composites at least

        I can hardly imagine how it is possible to "modernize" the MiG-31 using composites. The fact is that the welded fuselage is the main power element of the airframe, the use of steel and titanium is due to high speeds. In this regard, the introduction of composites in the MiG-31 airframe is practically unrealistic.
        With respect! hi
    2. 0
      25 October 2016 19: 47
      Quote: demiurg
      Pure interceptor and fighter for air superiority.

      ====
      Duc, after all, the title of the article says - "different purposes ..."
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. +3
    25 October 2016 16: 27
    Quote: Titsen
    An interesting article - "plus" to the author for the comparison.

    I hope that all the same there will not be their full-time fights in the border and border sections of the airspace ...

    But you need to be ready for this!
  5. +3
    25 October 2016 16: 50
    Autumn aggravation on Military Review! Evgeny Damantsev in all its glory!
    Here you can discuss for a long time written, but after
    but there was a huge list of used missile and bomb weapons, which was not on previous versions of the MiG-31

    belay BOMB CARL !!!
    and further
    KAB-500 guided bombs and other modern WTOs. These weapons turn the MiG-31BM into a real “killer” of enemy ground and sea air defense:

    belay
    stopped paying attention to the complete lack of logic and common sense in the article!
    1. +1
      25 October 2016 17: 44
      Even you did not quote the entire first sentence, because it is written in Russian that X-31P, X-59MK, etc. are included in the nomenclature of missiles, which are successfully used to suppress air defense. You just have nothing to do laughing
      1. +3
        25 October 2016 18: 14
        Quote: Fulcrum29
        Even you did not quote the entire first sentence, because it is written in Russian that X-31P, X-59MK, etc. are included in the nomenclature of missiles, which are successfully used to suppress air defense. You just have nothing to do laughing

        Eugene, when you write articles, use something forbidden?
        And so I see the 31 MiGs with CABs and RCC!
        Although ... After a glass or two, this can also be dreamed, judging by the article ... lol wink
  6. Cat
    +5
    25 October 2016 18: 36
    Thanks to the author!
    I read the comments with pleasure. I would venture to share my opinion. First of all, the MiG-31 is a high-speed platform, weighing over 40 tons, of which 9 tons are in service. It is not correct to compare it with front-line fighters and fighter-bombers. The latter for him, the "production" air defense fighter. He does not need to enter a mobile battle. Moreover, the only loss of the MiG-25 was just because of this. His task is to carry the blow at the maximum distance and leave. Problems with target designation can be solved by creating an AWACS aircraft on the basis of the MiG-31. Then they, in a mixed pair or three, can hit targets with more range of their detection.
    Moreover, having an advantage in speed, the MiG-31 will overtake the F35 before it has time to escape.
    1. 0
      26 October 2016 09: 26
      Then they, in a mixed pair or three, can strike at targets greater than their detection range.


      I think that with the appearance of the T-50 in our country, a bunch of invisible devices with the MiG-31 can "give birth" to new tactics. (Like a bait goose or something). Their parameters complement each other well - maybe the old man will work. It would be nice to study how the F-22 interacts with conventional fighters in the same Iraq, how the battle formations are built. The statesmen are also not bastard.
  7. 0
    25 October 2016 21: 53
    Article minus. Only an amateur could write that an interceptor could carry aerial bombs.
    1. Cat
      +2
      26 October 2016 05: 24
      No, not true.
      The essence of the latest MiG-31 modernization, in addition to improving its quality as an air defense fighter, is to teach it how to work on the ground, including bombs
    2. 0
      26 October 2016 08: 19
      Quote: Anton Yu
      Only an amateur could write

      Sorry, but you, not understanding the essence of the modernization of the MiG-31 to the level of BM, yourself made yourself an amateur. Kotische wrote you correctly.
    3. +1
      26 October 2016 09: 02
      Quote: Anton Yu
      Only an amateur could write that an interceptor could carry aerial bombs.

      Well, why? The MiG-25 in versions R and BM could very well, the latter in addition to anti-radar missiles.
    4. 0
      28 October 2016 04: 40
      if the hound has a "Peleng" navigator on board, it means it can wet ground targets,
  8. 0
    26 October 2016 13: 32
    very informative, the author plus
  9. +1
    26 October 2016 15: 17
    I'm wondering. People, are you seriously discussing the "merits" of Damantsev's article?
    1. 0
      26 October 2016 16: 14
      And why not, you always learn something new. Here, it turns out that the Mig-31 has a laser long-range meter appeared to direct the X-29L
      1. 0
        26 October 2016 16: 33
        we can mean that someone is shining!
      2. 0
        28 October 2016 04: 43
        The MiG-31F not only has a laser length meter, there is little tokma, but if you need a hound in the F mod, it's not difficult to "comb" the hound, the only question is - WHAT ..., if others have enough money
  10. +2
    29 October 2016 01: 36
    I could be wrong, but it seemed that the author was an amateur. Why compare the MiG-31 with the F-22? MiG-31 has an extraordinary age - 40 years.
    Throwing non-nuclear bombs from an interceptor flying at an altitude of 20 km - at a speed of 3000 km / h - is stupid. You can only get into the city.
    Panegyric Rogozin is not at all appropriate. Rogozin is not a specialist in military equipment. He is a professional politician, i.e. in the field of military technology - an amateur. His inner circle can successfully influence his opinion. Especially when it comes to appropriations.
  11. 0
    31 October 2016 16: 45
    Quote: Kotischa
    No, not true.
    The essence of the latest MiG-31 modernization, in addition to improving its quality as an air defense fighter, is to teach it how to work on the ground, including bombs

    offer to equip the Tu-160 with air-to-air missiles, send it to patrol the US coast. And that he alone can shoot down all the B-52s.
    1. 0
      10 November 2016 10: 32
      There are no bombs on BM ....
      1. 0
        7 March 2017 11: 03
        different sources, different numbers. According to one data, the combat load is 5 tons, according to others, 9 tons