The deployment of "Anteev" in Syria indicates a preparation for provocations that could develop into a major conflict

61

The main operations are the operations of the operations of the operations of the main operations center of the operations of the operations of the anti-aircraft rocket services of the C-300B / VM / VCNUMX anti-aircraft units; targeting missiles with phased arrays 4C9М


Despite the rather optimistic opinion of the Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation to the UN, Vitaly Churkin, on the current format of Russian-American relations, which he expressed on October 4, 2016, there is a geostrategic tension between pro-American military-political blocs (including allies on the Eurasian continent) and alliances supporting “ a multipolar "political system, not only acquires the characteristic features of the Cold War, but is more like a pre-escalation stage Third World War. We managed to make sure of this after two important events over the past month - statements by US State Department spokesman John Kirby with direct accusations and threats against the Russian Federation for anti-terrorist activities in the SAR, which is no longer convenient for Washington, as well as after a long-distance demonstration combat alert of our strategic missile carriers Tu-160, which reached the environs of the airspace of Spain and "raised to the ears" fighter Aviation Air defense of the Western European countries participating in NATO. All this is extremely revealing. But the riders are still riveted news tapes with reports on the additional deployment of the S-300B4 anti-aircraft missile system in Syria, designated in NATO as the SA-23 "Giant".



A year earlier, after a pre-planned interception of our Su-24M by the Turkish F-16C, to ensure the safety of tactical aviation of the Russian Air Force, the Triumph C-400 long-range air defense system with covering C1 was already deployed to the Khmeimim airbase. The sky of the northwestern provinces of Syria turned out to be under reliable anti-aircraft and anti-missile "umbrella", able to protect against most of the air attack weapons used in the Syrian theater, which are in service with the air forces of the Western coalition, Saudi Arabia and Turkey. It is these states whose interests go hand in hand with the interests of the ISIL terrorist formations that represent and will pose a major threat to our contingent in the SAR.

Trying in the language of threats “to show us our place”, the US State Department through the mouth of Kirby hinted that if we continue to suppress the activities of opposition and terrorist cells in the interests of the West in the Syrian Arab Republic, then in Washington they can give the go-ahead for the delivery of more advanced lethal weapons and instructors, and later, in general, officially stand on the side of all anti-Assad forces in the region, which means the likelihood of a direct conflict between Russia and the United States using conventional tactical and ategicheskih types of missile. But for our country, their instructions turned out to be ridiculous, and in order to make the continuation of the existing strategy in the region more convincing, but already taking into account the new statements of Kirby, the latest version of Anthea was delivered to the country. Such a significant military-strategic step was caused by Moscow at once by two very disturbing circumstances.

Firstly, this is the Pentagon seminar of the US Supreme Command at which high-ranking military personnel from the command and staff level, like General William Hicks, and the head of the American Army, Mark Milli, made very sharp statements that may indicate preparation for a major war with Russia. Federation and its allies. W. Hicks noted that “opposition with the use of non-nuclear forces in the near future will be deadly and swift.” This tells us that regardless of the outbreak of the theater of war (whether it be the Syrian, Baltic or Ukrainian), the US armed forces will use all non-nuclear tools of the 21st century network-centric warfare, where the emphasis will be on the so-called concept of a fast global strike (BSU, or, as it is called in NATO, PGS - Prompt Global Strike). This concept provides for the implementation of conventional massed rocket-air strikes (MRAUs) on our strategic facilities with the help of hundreds of missile defense systems AGM-86C / D ALCM, Tomahawk, as well as long-range tactical missiles AGM-158B JASSM-ER, and an attack from using the X-51 “Waverider” hypersonic strategic winged means of air attack. The hypersonic brainchild of Boeing is capable of overcoming more than 1000 km of stratospheric space at altitudes of about 24 km with speeds of 4,5 — 7М, creating considerable difficulties even with such advanced air defense systems like С-300ПМ1 / 2. Mark Milli's words that “the likelihood of a conflict with the Russian Federation is practically guaranteed” strengthened us even more in the opinion of the most negative developments.

A few days later, on October 7, the official representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry, Maria Zakharova, justified the need for C-300B4 in Syria to leak information from various sources in the United States about planned missile strikes against major Syrian air bases. But more interest is caused by the type of “Three Hundreds”, which is sent to protect the Syrian airspace (including the strategically important port of Tartus). After all, to fight the usual American cruise missiles, the VKS could transfer several more C-300PM1 or C-400 Triumf divisions, supplementing them with several automated control systems of the Polyana-D4-X1 or Baikal-XNX anti-aircraft missile brigade. the most expensive and complex C-1B300, having a more complex radar architecture, as well as enhanced capabilities for intercepting hypersonic aircraft at ranges beyond the C-4PM300 family.

The C-300B4 anti-missile system is a radically upgraded version of the Antey-300 C-300B and C-2500BM. The composition of one division according to the standard is represented by 1 radar detector 9С15М2 “N3 Review”, 1 9C19М2 program review radar for detecting targets, linking their tracks and further targeting to four multi-channel missile targeting stations (NNRO). Before entering target designation on 9C32М9, all information about the targets detected by Obzor-32 and Ginger is analyzed at automated workplaces in the cockpit of the 2X3М command and control station. After taking targets for accurate auto tracking of MSNR 9С457М, data transfer traffic flow, the client is able to set up a pattern to read out the continuous radiation radar and target illumination (RPN) installed on 9 launchers 32А16М and 9 PU 83А8М, hence we have a launch of 9А82М and 300 PU 4А24M launchers, hence we have a target of . As you can see, the number of elements and the performance of the C-300B4 is higher than that of the standard C-300PM1 or C-400 Triumph division. In addition, the radar "Ginger" has additional specialized modes of operation for the detection and tracking of ballistic, aeroballistic and aerodynamic targets with EPR 0,02 м2.

The manufacturer announced a twofold increase in the range of the C-300B4, compared to the C-300BM, in the category of those in the Antei-2500 (from 200 to 400 km), using the 9A82M new long-range similar to the 40X6 PU, similar to the heavy 400X300, which are similar to X-NUMXM, similar to the heavy 9X15, similar to the heavy 9X19. Triumph". This indicates a significant increase in the energy parameters of all radar stations that make up the prospective Anthea division. The standard radars of the first modification C-9В (32С330М, 3С145М and 175С9) had an instrumental range of no more than 32 km (at Obzor-300) and 4-3 km (at Ginger and XNXXX) and at Ginger and XNXXX (at Ginger and XNXXK) and at 300-4 km (at Ginger and XNXXX) The combat potential of the C-XNUMXBXNUMX increased more than XNUMX times. For high accuracy performance when working with ultra-small ballistic targets, all C-XNUMXВXNUMX radar tools operate in the centimeter wavelength range, which is a rarity among domestic and western air defense systems.

Next, go to interceptor missiles such as 9М83М and 9М82М. These two-stage missiles with aerodynamic "bearing cone". The 9М82М missile is equipped with a more powerful first (starting) stage, which realizes the 2600 speed m / s (the latest version of the 400 km missile can reach 3200 m / s), which is 25-35% more than 48H6XXNUM type rockets / 2 (up to 3 m / s) used by the C-2100 “Triumph” system. Advanced 400M9М anti-aircraft missiles have excellent speed characteristics for the destruction of complex hypersonic objects at altitudes up to 82 km (both on opposing intersecting trajectories and in pursuit), as well as aerodynamic targets at a distance 150 km. Due to the high hypersonic speed and flight altitudes, 400М9М cannot be intercepted by such complexes as the Patriot PAC-82 or SAMP-T, and more advanced anti-missile systems like SM-3 or THAAD will have difficulty in intercepting our missiles, since it is known that the "3-i" is able to maneuver with overloads from 82 to 25 units: RIM-35A / B can hardly surpass our anti-aircraft missile in flight performance of the combat stage.

The antiaircraft guided missile 9М83М is equipped with a less high-torque launch stage, and therefore it is more designed to combat ballistic and aerodynamic objects at distances from 100 — 150 km. If the highly specialized 9М82М is used mainly for hitting ballistic targets, long-range radar detection and control aircraft such as E-3C / G, RTR aircraft and ground target designation RC-135V / W and E-8C, the more multifunctional 9M83 is a developer developed by the company. , drone drone, anti-radar missiles, guided bombs and other high-precision means of air attack, massively used by the enemy in the theater of operations. For example, one C-300B4 division has an 72 CG 9M83M arsenal and a total of 24 9М82М CUR, while the “classic” C-300PM1 / C-400 CG has a total of 48 HPS dial protection in the full range of the number of the company’s unanstess and the full number of the full number of the number of the company’s unanscripnt drop dialing to the most important Here, too, the reason for the deployment in Syria is C-48B6.

Great difficulty with fine-tuning active radar homing missiles family 9M96D led to the fact that "Chetyrohsotki" today intrudes on alert mainly 48N6E3, more accessible language - ammunition "triumph" does not increase more than 48 missiles division, and to repel a possible MRAU On the part of the USAF, you need significantly more antimissiles. "Antey" today fully complies with all these requirements.

What else can be so attractive C-300В4 for the Middle East arena of global confrontation? Undoubtedly, with its unique vitality in the most unpredictable operational situation. As befits any military air defense and antimissile defense, the C-300B / VM / VK anti-aircraft missile division with its 4 radar types can continue to carry out combat missions until the last destroyed 9CXNNXXM radar targeting all 32-x radar targeting radar 24CXNNXXM, or defeating all 88-X radar targeting radar 300CXNNXXM, or defeating all 1-x radar targeting radar 400CXNNXXM, or defeating all 30-x radar, targeting 6CXNNXXM radar, or defeating all 92-X radar targeting radar 6C 300M, or defeating all 4-X radar targeting radius highlighting the goal. To realize this, it is necessary to spend a lot of time and about a hundred anti-radar missiles such as AGM-XNUMX HARM. To break into the C-XNUMXPMXNUMX or C-XNUMX Triumph defense, it is enough to disable the only multi-purpose radar XNUMXHXNUMXЕ / XNUMXНXNUMXЕ, which can be achieved with a single and powerful air strike using a pair of three dozen HARMs. The game of “hide and seek” of NATO tactical aviation, cuddling to the earth’s surface with the C-XNUMXBXNUMX deployed in Syria, will turn into a real torture for their pilots, in which not many will remain alive. We will observe a similar outcome in the event that the thoughtless part of the gray matter of the American leadership prevails over a share of common sense.


SAM Division C 300V4 submitted 4 batteries (each of which includes 6 launchers 9A82 / 83M and 3 start-charging installation 9A84 / 85M with imparted LRMS 9S32M) may be deployed on Syrian HPT absolutely in any configuration, including including the most effective cover for the main strategic facilities of the Syrian Armed Forces and the Russian Aerospace Force. To enable over-the-horizon system linkage between several batteries of the C-300В4 division, several FL-1 “Pine” antennas (in the photo) providing tactical communication between separate elements of ZRK over large areas can be integrated into the multi-channel interface of the ACS “Baikal-95МЭ”


The S-300В4, which has entered into combat duty in the Syrian Arab Republic, will be used exclusively in conjunction with the Triumph C-400 system. A full-fledged network-centric linkage between the two “Three Hundreds” modifications is likely to be carried out by the automated control system of the Baikal-1МЭ anti-aircraft defense defense group, synchronized with which there will be also many of the attached radio-electronic and radio-electronic reconnaissance, electronic warfare and ground-based airborne systems. communication and information exchange for tactical aviation. Due to this, both the ground and air components of our link of the Aerospace Forces in Syria will be able to act as a single, super-operational association capable of repelling any kind of threat.

It is in these tactical and technical points that the C-300B4 transfer to the Middle East can be hidden. In the meantime, the American media is “raging passions” regarding the exchange of preventive nuclear strikes between the Russian Federation and the States in the near future, the Russian contingent on the Syrian example continues to confidently and unconditionally implement the most prudent and fair model of the world order of the XXI century.

Information sources:
http://www.vz.ru/politics/2016/10/7/836801.html
http://forums.airbase.ru/2004/04/t25668--kompleks-s-300v.html
http://www.vko.ru/biblioteka/avtomatizirovannaya-sistema-upravleniya-komandnogo-punkta-zenitnoy-raketnoy-brigady
http://rbase.new-factoria.ru/missile/wobb/c300v/c300v.shtml
http://bastion-karpenko.narod.ru/S-300V4.html
http://rbase.new-factoria.ru/missile/wobb/c300pmu1/c300pmu1.shtml
http://rbase.new-factoria.ru/missile/wobb/s400/s400.shtml
61 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    11 October 2016 06: 38
    "Everything is more curious and curious" (c). Well, we'll try to annul the UES advantage in the air, but the same bastards won't stop. The abscess ripens and ripens. It will explode :( How scary.
    1. +6
      11 October 2016 06: 59
      Well, they know that if the security of Russia is threatened, they can get a nuclear strike .., you have to be a complete idiot to kick a bear ...
      1. +16
        11 October 2016 07: 24
        well, so they are
        1. +6
          11 October 2016 10: 36
          great stuff! meticulous work of the author!
          1. +3
            11 October 2016 13: 18
            The author has a scrupulous brain, he doesn’t see beyond the leaves of the forests - he wrote a bunch of indexes, but he is trying to compare the air defense systems of the object cover with the military air defense systems. Which are primarily mobile. From here, by the way, completely different reasons for the deployment of 300V * in Syria follow ....
            1. +4
              12 October 2016 00: 09
              Quote: Thor
              The author has a scrupulous brain

              And a severe form of "urya-patriotism", very often carried away by his own fantasies, he draws unfounded conclusions. fool
              1. 0
                4 January 2017 17: 38
                For instance? In the sense of unreasonable?
                I do not know how far the RLO really "shines" and the distant missile is flying, but ... mattress mats do not know for sure either.
                And if something happens, it can be tested in practice in conditions "close to combat".
                So what are the author’s fantasies?
        2. +8
          11 October 2016 10: 42
          1) They need a war until I can’t, because I need to write off external debt. Paying is unrealistic, but having set up a war and burying creditors is easy (as Americans think). 90s style however
          2) Press everyone to the nail completely to become the ultimate rulers of the whole world. Smoked sacred dreams with an old woman expressed (exceptional nation, a hail of light on seven hills, the only hope of all progressive mankind)
          3) Restart the deceased economy, quietly changing the state structure in the FSA itself.
          4) The expansion of the dollar into new territories (the merger of new territories under their control)
          These are four obvious reasons why she is so furious right now. It is likely that the war will be fought in a non-nuclear version. The first strike is generally targeted missile strikes at key centers, both military and civilian.

          With China, a moot point, they will come to fight or not, but Russia will be the first to attack them. In their opinion, everything has been explored for a long time. There can be no surprises.
          1. +8
            11 October 2016 11: 51
            In fact, the case with the Americans is rubbish. Faced the super-duper super-duper US prodigy and the no less hyped air defense system of Russia. But this Americans avoided for many years, if not decades.
            The bottom line is, there are not many scenarios left and they are all bad.
            1) Russians put air defense, Americans hammer their tongue in the ass (even if because of the reluctance to start the 3rd World War). So the US wunderwaffles are an empty chatter, the hegemon has become obsolete and then all the other conclusions.
            2) The Russians put up air defense, the Americans strike, the Russians fight back as much as possible (after all, 2 complexes + low altitudes are not so many, in fact, against a massive attack and minimum flying time, especially for the Kyrgyz Republic), but this means an answer to US bases as minimum and further raged not a showdown for children with the transition to the 3rd World War.
            3) The US attack is not so massive, it turns out that the invisibility of US aviation is really nothing more than an illusion, and then the world understands that the king is really not only naked, but covered only by tulle from the kitchen.

            Those. if this Syrian crap does not end in a global batch, then all other scenarios are no better for the United States.
            1. 0
              17 October 2016 20: 17
              There will be option number 2. If the Americans will decide to attack, then for sure, that is, all the crap. And I'm afraid Syria will fall. This will serve as a go-ahead for the beginning of World War 3.
      2. +1
        11 October 2016 14: 47
        there will be no nuclear strike, the contaminated area that nobody needs to use, there will be the use of bacteriological and chemical weapons ... in the order of duty paranoia, I can assume that all zombie themes from Hollywood are nothing more than preparing the population for the consequences of the reciprocal use of bacteriological and chemical weapons. ... and what they have in their arsenals about this (and there is for sure) only those who are supposed to know ... that’s the Emergencies Ministry’s exercises recently ... https://rg.ru/2016/10/09/glava -mchs-rasskazal-ob-
        itogah-krupnejshej-training-po-grazhdanskoj-obo
        rone.html
      3. 0
        31 January 2018 09: 39
        The optimist is you, Rom14, however. How will these families inflict a blow, they all hang out there. These will surrender us, which is now in power, if the time comes for "Ch", as the pre-war conspirators would have surrendered, if Stalin had not partially cleared them, and even then, far from all that the summer of 41 showed.
        The country needs change. With these, we have no chance. And no technology can save, do not flatter yourself.
    2. +8
      11 October 2016 09: 44
      The deployment of "Anteev" in Syria indicates a preparation for provocations that could develop into a major conflict

      This indicates that our MO, taught by bitter experience with the Su-24 shot down by the Turks, is now taking all comprehensive measures in advance to protect the personnel and equipment of the Russian bases in the ATS. Which is understandable and completely justified.
      1. +10
        11 October 2016 12: 33
        Quote: GSH-18
        our MO, taught by bitter experience with the Su-24 shot down by the Turks, is now taking all comprehensive measures in advance to protect the personnel and equipment of the Russian bases in the ATS.
        God grant! All this beauty will also be crushed by the Shells, then there will be ICE in general!
        BUT ... There is one big BUT!
        The history of the invasion of Libya shows that the Amer commandos struck at the R / L posts on the eve of the air strike. Heavy sniper rifles with 2000m can damage the antenna post. Again TOU from the shelter ... That's where the ambush can be!
        Therefore, all heights and probable positions / positions of snipers, sites for TOU should be mined in advance and shot by the Grads / Solntsepekami, regularly combed by moving patrols, etc. I really hope that the local command will take into account this threat to our air defense systems.
        Best regards, hi
    3. +2
      11 October 2016 10: 15
      A very detailed and complete article. Thank you very much. It is clear that it’s hard for a non-specialist like myself to understand all this, but the general meaning is clear. C-300В4 is a great addition to C-400 and I would even say this complex as can be seen from the above and is imprisoned in conjunction with C-400. Individually, each of them has flaws in certain situations. But they balance / complement each other than the whole system wins many times.
      1. +5
        11 October 2016 11: 09
        Quote: seti
        A very detailed and complete article.

        Come on, Eugene once again demonstrates ignorance of the subject of which he is trying to write! No. For example:
        The manufacturer announced a twofold increase in the range of the C-300В4, in comparison with the C-300ВМ "Antey-2500" (from 200 to 400 km), due to the use of new long-range missiles similar to the heavy 9НXNXX XX, used by the 82X40M PU, Triumph".
        Does the author not understand the difference between missiles designed to deal with ballistic and aerodynamic targets? In addition, have the 40Н6 missiles been tested and entered service with anti-aircraft anti-aircraft systems? No. How can we talk about what does not exist in nature yet?
        Quote: Flinky
        Am I missing a couple? With what hangover did the mattress have hypersound, and even strategic? The author does not confuse anything?
        The author in your repertoire, what do you want? This is Damantsev! negative
        1. +2
          11 October 2016 15: 51
          Sergey, so with 40H6 there is complete incomprehensibility. Most likely, they have not yet been brought to mind, but who knows. And the long S-300V missiles most likely remained semi-active.
          1. +3
            12 October 2016 05: 13
            Quote: sivuch
            Sergey, so with 40Н6 complete incomprehensibility. Most likely, they have not yet been brought to mind, but - who knows.

            Igor, there are no new long-range missiles in the troops and it is not known when they will appear. Statements that the S-400 air defense system can hit targets at a range of 400 km are not yet true.
  2. +6
    11 October 2016 07: 40
    This concept provides for both the implementation of conventional massive missile-aircraft strikes (MRAU) against our strategic targets using hundreds of ASM AGM-86C / D ALCM, Tomahawk, as well as tactical long-range missiles AGM-158B JASSM-ER, and an attack with using hypersonic strategic winged air attack weapons such as the X-51 Waverider

    Am I missing a couple? With what hangover did the mattress have hypersound, and even strategic? The author does not confuse anything?
    1. 0
      31 January 2018 09: 47
      The article is a hodgepodge of our and Amerov’s Wishlist. But it’s better for us to overdo it (I apologize for being rude) than scratch the back of my head, looking at the burnt air defense. It is necessary to strengthen quantitatively and qualitatively. The Pentagon only do not fight on earth, and in terms of delivering air strikes, and soon from above, they have completely succeeded. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen, and not in words, but in practice.
  3. +3
    11 October 2016 07: 57
    "In the meantime, passions are raging in the American media regarding the exchange of preventive nuclear strikes between the Russian Federation and the United States in the near future."
    maybe (preventively) ... 1 missile ... with a special warhead ... for the Saudis, for the Riyadh ... there are few minuses, like the victims (the desert is all around), but there are more than enough advantages - to scare other "partners" with nuclear weapons, eliminate the main sponsor of ISIS, etc. etc.
    PS I'm of course from the field of delirium
    1. +8
      11 October 2016 08: 23
      So play with the nuclear muscles wink Israel has such toys winked Hit Tehran alone, one by the Saudis feel winked
      PS. Dreaming, of course, is not harmful laughing , but find and read the memories of the Japanese after testing "miracle weapons" on them and ask yourself and your American friends if it will be interesting to experience what others have experienced wink ? Then maybe bad thoughts will not go into your head request
      Nuclear weapons are a guarantee that the absence of brains in some people does not cause the destruction of others that still have them hi
  4. +3
    11 October 2016 08: 49
    Air defense placed absolutely right. S-300/400 systems keep the air forces of the countries operating in Syria in suspense. And the pilots are aware that their retribution will overtake, if not immediately, then even before arriving at the base. That AWACS aircraft under force majeure circumstances will not give them advantages. and they will also be shot down. Air defense of such a plan cools the brains of generals and everyone tries to play by the rules. And then France wants without a flight zone and Germany wants. And only for the Syrian Air Force and Russia. Why offer if you can’t provide?
    1. 0
      11 October 2016 11: 59
      Quote: Zaurbek
      And then France wants without a flight zone and Germany wants.


      Well, they don’t fly, why should they lose
  5. +2
    11 October 2016 08: 51
    Very sensible and interesting article.
  6. +2
    11 October 2016 09: 33
    Air defense is all very good and vital, but "Calibers" must be produced in a highly accelerated mode.
    1. +8
      11 October 2016 09: 47
      ZIK and so in 3 shifts and plows on weekends.
      1. 0
        11 October 2016 14: 07
        Info verified? If so, then there is definitely a preparation for a schucher!
        1. 0
          17 October 2016 20: 25
          And who has not yet been called from the military enlistment office with a request to look at them, to check the relevance of the size of the form (in case of instant mobilization)?
          A schukher for military commissariats and housing offices (they are checking the VO registry) has already been pointed out, preparations are underway - personally verified.
    2. 0
      31 January 2018 09: 51
      A lot of things are needed, unfortunately. But you must. Something is boring at heart. Now is not June 41st, even months, weeks and even days will not be answered. If we don’t answer right away, then ...
  7. 0
    11 October 2016 11: 10
    In my opinion, it is not worth taking seriously the idea of ​​exchanging non-nuclear strikes seriously.
    As we all understand this will lead to the exchange of nuclear, thermonuclear, bacteriological, possibly climatic "blanks". Well, Putin or Obama will not sit and just listen to the angry comments of their citizens about the destruction of their countries' military personnel. And if they do, then this is the end of their political career.
    In my opinion, the Russian Federation is more afraid of provocations by the UAE coalition or other not well-known US allies.
    The UAE, however, disowned attacks in Yemen, such as: - The guys are not us, but UFOs.
    1. +2
      11 October 2016 11: 46
      Quote: Nova3054
      As we all understand this will lead to the exchange of nuclear, thermonuclear, bacteriological, possibly climatic "blanks".

      About "bacteriological" and "climatic" discs, please, in more detail. bully
    2. +2
      11 October 2016 12: 01
      One not very powerful YAB in Yellowstone volcano and minus the USA from the political map of the world
      1. +3
        11 October 2016 12: 32
        Quote: uskrabut
        One not very powerful YAB in Yellowstone volcano and minus the USA from the political map of the world

        If the supervolcano in Yellowstone wakes up, it will seem "sour" to everyone. In addition, it is not a fact that even an underground nuclear explosion will cause an eruption.
        1. +1
          17 October 2016 20: 40
          Quote: Bongo
          If the supervolcano in Yellowstone wakes up, it will seem "sour" to everyone.

          But first of all, on whose territory is this supervolcano located, right? Although, the difference between the consequences of the global nuclear war and the eruption of the Yellowstone abscess is unlikely to be, that is, everything will be raked due to the effects of climate change.
          Quote: Bongo
          Moreover, it is not a fact that even an underground nuclear explosion will cause an eruption.

          There is a variety of nuclear warheads just sharpened for inflicting maximum underground destruction. So it is theoretically possible to arrange a provocation. And if you still arrange everything correctly, it will turn out that "it broke out there by itself." How they tried to arrange a radioactive srach near Chelyabinsk with a "meteorite" ... Who is in the subject?
      2. 0
        31 January 2018 09: 52
        Thank you, good man! Then the whole world does not seem enough.
  8. 0
    11 October 2016 11: 12
    And so in general, the world community should have a "bench press" "bench press" complete throughout this situation.
    But Clinton and 56% (approximate figure) have elections and maintain her crazy image.
  9. +7
    11 October 2016 11: 14
    There was information that mattresses repainted their Hornets in the colors of our VKS. And purely visual, the Hornet really looks like a Duckling. And from here the conclusion suggests itself that amphibians decided to follow the path of provocations. Such a repainted Hornet would be bombed by the Assad army or a school with children and really then prove that it was not our Duckling who did it. Apparently, this is why they also put the S-300 in Syria, since nobody canceled their friend or foe system. And do not care about the color of the aircraft. But the signal is not joyful enough.
    1. +4
      11 October 2016 12: 47
      Quote: NEXUS
      There was information that mattresses repainted their Hornets in the colors of our VKS.

      Andrey, welcome! This practice is more than 25 years old; there are quite a few F-15, F-16 and F-18 painted in the colors of the Russian Air Force in the US Air Force and Navy. Not so long ago, Damantsev was already hysterical about this, posing as a sensation.

      F / A-18 at Jacksonville Air Base

      F-15С at Nellis Air Base
      Doesn't it remind anything?
      1. +3
        11 October 2016 13: 27
        Bongo
        Andrey, welcome!

        Serega, hello, friend! drinks
        Yes, I know that this practice is more than a dozen years old ... but the situation in Syria is somewhat different ... and there any "spark" can be such a fire to the whole world that Vietnam, Afghanistan and Korea taken together will seem like a simple Chinese fireworks. And this must be understood ... after all, the Hornets are repainted or fly somewhere over Arizona, namely in Syria.
        1. +3
          11 October 2016 13: 49
          Quote: NEXUS
          Yes, I know that this practice is more than a dozen years old ... but the situation in Syria is somewhat different ... and there any "spark" can be such a fire to the whole world that Vietnam, Afghanistan and Korea taken together will seem like a simple Chinese fireworks.

          You know, I am far from "hurray-patriotism", but I am deeply convinced that "their guts are thin." The repainted F / A-18 can be used in joint exercises with the Air Force of Turkey and other states, as well as for organizing provocations and distrust of the actions of the Russian Air Force. But I do not believe in the unleashing of a full-scale conflict between the United States and Russia in Syria. Although we will not be able to win there, inflicting unacceptable losses even without using nuclear weapons is quite.
          1. +5
            11 October 2016 14: 17
            Bongo
            Repainted F / A-18 can be used in joint exercises with the Turkish Air Force and other states, as well as for organizing provocations and distrust of the actions of the Russian Air Force.

            You understand that they are trying to portray us as an empire of evil ... and about the belief in unleashing a conflict ... the likelihood that our air defense will work "by mistake" on the Mattress plane is higher every day. And there, if there is such a case, the game will cease to be languid. There are no defeatist sentiments, but amphibians do not want to surrender Aleppo under any circumstances, and therefore, perhaps our air defense will have to show itself in action.
  10. +1
    11 October 2016 12: 09
    Yes, the article is not bad, but the author completely lost sight of the fact that a full-fledged defense of air defense is built using IA. By the way, the interaction of the ground defense air defense system and the air defense air defense system (air defense system) is a very big problem, because different research institutes are in charge of the development!
  11. +1
    11 October 2016 12: 30
    Quote: aktanir
    great stuff! meticulous work of the author!
    Moreover, the material is qualitatively verified and everything is laid out on shelves, which has become a rarity for HE. Bold plus and thanks!
    1. +3
      11 October 2016 12: 52
      Quote: avg-mgn
      Moreover, the material is qualitatively verified and everything is laid out on shelves, which has become a rarity for HE. Bold plus and thanks!

      Vladimir, with all due respect, I can’t agree with you! No. The publication is full of technical errors and unfounded allegations.
      1. 0
        11 October 2016 19: 09
        This is for brainstorming a probable opponent. Well, in your opinion, they also give the key to the apartment where the money is?
      2. 0
        11 October 2016 21: 26
        The main thing is that there is no critical mass in every sense
  12. 0
    11 October 2016 13: 01
    Unfortunately, we do not churn out the S-300-400-500 complexes so far, like sausages (the saying of the "chief" missile officer of the USSR of the 60s, NS Khrushchev), in order to distribute them left and right, and place them on all problematic corners of the globe. Therefore, so far - only problem points, only critical places.
    The role of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in ensuring the necessary period of time for the deployment of systems is super important, this is practically our first line of air defense and missile defense (in a tailcoat, with a bow tie, in a gorgeous dress, and with a stunning surprise in a cigarette case or cosmetic bag).
  13. 0
    11 October 2016 13: 19
    Our brutal fighter needs a link, or better a squadron, a MiG-31, to help counter a massive attack. It is the MiGs that must break the "system" and knock out the main fighters at the stage of entering the combat course. Success is possible only in symbiosis, synergy between C300V4 and MiG-31. And the younger ones, Armor and Torah, can easily cope with the adversary's CD.
  14. +2
    11 October 2016 13: 33
    With all due respect to the author of the article, he does not quite understand that the interaction of "Baikals" and "Polyana" directly is impossible, so talking about the interaction of two completely different air defense systems is not entirely correct ... The situation with interaction could be corrected by the KSA higher level - for example, mobile "Bastion", or "Bastion FOR".
  15. +2
    11 October 2016 14: 03
    Quote: Tektor
    Our brutal fighter needs a link, or better a squadron, a MiG-31, to help counter a massive attack. It is the MiGs that must break the "system" and knock out the main fighters at the stage of entering the combat course. Success is possible only in symbiosis, synergy between C300V4 and MiG-31. And the younger ones, Armor and Torah, can easily cope with the adversary's CD.

    And which KSA will ensure the interaction of MiGs and military air defense systems, which are the S-300V and its further modifications ?!
    1. +1
      11 October 2016 15: 23
      The declared range of the last modification AIM-120D intended for the F-22A Raptor is only 180 km, which roughly corresponds to the old R-33. The launch range of the R-37 for the MiG-31 is 300 km.
      External target designation with AWACS will allow the F-22 to only reach the target. But in order to launch, it is necessary for the F-22 radar itself to capture the target. AN / APG-77 range of detection of 300 km, range of defeat 180, radar station Barrier M detection range of 320 km, range of defeat 180 km.
      Missile launch for external target designation has been implemented so far only in the MiG-31. This is when rockets run out in the group of one of the planes in the group, but he holds the target in capture, then he can use the rockets of another plane in the group. Sometimes, part of the CVC equipment and the communication system of the head MiG-31 were put on a ground PN and interfaced with ACS Boundary. The group of aircraft was reduced from 4 to 3. In this case, long-range ground-based radars made it possible to automatically carry out target designations as well as DRLO systems. Only much more reliable and cheaper, which is very important for the sudden reflection of the IOS. In addition, the low visibility of the Raptor and other Stealths does not work for ground-based radars that operate in the UHF and UHF range. Stealth in this range glow very well. So when working with ground-based ACSs, the fighter will in any case receive target designation much earlier and will reach the target with the optimal course and angle.
      1. +2
        11 October 2016 16: 51
        So what automation tool will provide your ghostly illusions ?!
  16. 0
    11 October 2016 14: 08
    Despite the rather optimistic opinion of Vitaly Churkin, Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation to the UN, regarding the existing format of Russian-American relations
    That's why he and the diplomat are smiling and talking, talking, talking ... We are observing the opinion and retaliatory measures of the General Staff in real time.
  17. +1
    11 October 2016 16: 13
    The Americans (by the way, you can use the word - s? Here) breaks the bar from impunity, as it is now fashionable to say clearly. But to punish (well, or click on the nose) they can only be by force of arms. They are unlikely to understand otherwise. And you know what to do business.
  18. 0
    11 October 2016 21: 20
    Thanks for the competent article professionally and convincingly.
  19. +2
    12 October 2016 00: 11
    Quote: parafoiler
    This is for brainstorming a probable opponent. Well, in your opinion, they also give the key to the apartment where the money is?

    Do you think the "probable enemy" is so stupid? No.
    Quote: ref25
    Thanks for the competent article professionally and convincingly.

    Where do you notice competence? what
  20. 0
    12 October 2016 04: 19
    How many S-300B4 were delivered? Division? Two?
  21. 0
    1 February 2017 18: 11
    if you climb with your massive blow, you need to wet them with nuclear weapons so that McCain fries alive, burns and squeals like a pig.
  22. 0
    31 January 2018 09: 32
    Very optimistic, especially about the interception of hypersonic warheads. But in general, everything is very sad, if you count the capabilities of our and "partners". It was not necessary to deal with football and olympiads, simultaneously increasing the oligophrenic fleet, but with the defense industry and the country as a whole. Not in Turkey to build nuclear power plants for free for the Turks, but at home. Etc.
  23. 0
    9 March 2018 07: 59
    s you! You only manage to make a movie, everything else blah blah!