On the centenary of the plant named after Degtyaryov: from the machine gun Madsen to KORD. Part of 4

31
In the pre-war years, the plant in Kovrov, which today bears the name of ZiD - Degtyarev Plant, mastered the first machine-gun system in the country. In 1927, 7,62-mm manual was adopted. Degtyarev machine gun (Dp) and then him aviation (YES) and tank (DT) options. Before the war itself, the first Soviet large-caliber 12,7 mm machine gun was adopted DShK (Degtyarev - Shpagin). During the war years, in addition to this product, in Kovrov, PPSh and PPD submachine guns were assembled, as well as ShVAK aircraft guns and many other samples. weaponswhich are considered to be the weapon of victory.

In total, during the war years, the plant released and handed to the howling at the front of the 1 units a million 202 thousands of 481 units. At the same time, employees of the enterprise fought with the enemy on all fronts of the Great Patriotic War, more than a thousand factory workers never returned from the battlefields. September 16 1945 was awarded the Order of Lenin for the successful fulfillment of the tasks of the State Defense Committee - State Defense Committee for the provision of the Red Army with infantry and small arms. In this work on the creation of new types of automatic weapons did not stop here for a minute. In the postwar years, the plant is constantly developing new products. The new machine gun, launched into serial production, was the RPD, the Degtyarev system's light machine gun, in service with the Soviet Army until the middle of the 1960s. [/ justify]





RPD - Degtyarev light machine gun

Already at the end of 1943, work on the development of light machine guns for the new intermediate cartridge 7,62x39 mm began in the USSR. The field tests conducted have demonstrated that the destructive power of the bullets of such cartridges and the accuracy of their combat are satisfactory at a distance of up to 800 meters. As shown by combat experience, this range for light machine guns was quite enough. Famous designers Simonov, Sudayev, Degtyarev and others took part in the design of the new Soviet light machine guns.

In 1944, on the ongoing competitive trials, the light machine gun, proposed by Degtyarev, pulled out ahead; the machine gun was known under the designation RD-44. Until the end of World War II, this light machine gun was made in a small series, which passed military tests. Soon after the end of the war, a modernized version of the machine gun was adopted by the Soviet Army under the designation RPD, the Degtyaryov light machine gun. It is worth noting that the RPD was one of the first officially adopted for use weapons of small arms for the new intermediate cartridge model 1943 of the year. The first prototype RPD light machine guns had separate cartridge boxes with tape, but over time, preference was given to the box that was attached directly to the machine gun: it solved the problem of increasing the weapon’s rate of fire while maintaining combat readiness and maneuverability. The ammunition box was always with a manual machine gun, and a machine gunner in a battle could quickly change position and open fire on the enemy without the help of the second number of the calculation.

RPD is an automatic small arms with a gas engine automation and band power. The work of automatic machine gun was based on the use of the energy of powder gases, which are discharged from the barrel. When firing a weapon, a part of the powder gases ejecting a bullet is directed through a special hole in the barrel wall into the gas chamber and presses against the front wall of the gas piston, throwing the piston together with the slide frame and the bolt into the rear position. After that, the shutter opens the barrel bore, and the slide frame compresses the return-combat spring. The liner is removed from the chamber and is then thrown out. The feed mechanism advances the belt forward and delivers a new cartridge that is installed opposite the longitudinal shape receiver window.


On the centenary of the plant named after Degtyaryov: from the machine gun Madsen to KORD. Part of 4


If the trigger of the machine gun is still pressed, the slide frame does not stop in the rear position, but moves forward under the influence of the return mechanism. The shutter of the light machine gun pushes the new cartridge out of the tape, after which it is sent to the chamber and closes the barrel bore. The locking of the machine gun shutter is carried out by the lugs included in the military ledges of the receiver, after which the bolt carrier bar beats the firing pin. The striker’s rifle smashes the cartridge's cap, after which a shot occurs and the automatic operation of the machine gun is repeated. The fire from the RPD machine gun is carried out from the open shutter, while the arrow is available only automatic firing mode.

Instead of the store supply, which was used on the DP and PDM series machine guns, the new RPD machine gun was switched to tape feed. The power of the machine gun was carried out from non-bulk metal tape, designed for 100 cartridges. The tape consisted of two identical pieces of 50 cartridges each. Curb tape was located in a round box (box), which is adjacent to the bottom of the machine gun. The choice of such a design provided the machine gun with good mobility (the tape overhang was excluded) and the increased combat rate of fire.

It is worth noting that the RPD was the first machine-powered tape-powered machine gun in the Soviet Union (if you do not take into account the remake machine gun of the Maxim-Tokarev system). The use of the ribbon machine in the new light machine gun was largely due to the influence of the successful use of such a power scheme by the Germans, in particular in the uniform machine guns MG-34 and MG-42, which were widely used by the German infantry throughout the war. The tape not only made it possible to increase the combat rate of fire of the weapon, but also to reduce the weight of a light machine gun with standard ammunition to acceptable values. An important point was also the fact that the tape feed system of cartridges excluded the presence of springs, which usually became the causes of delays in machine guns with the magazine supply system.




Normally, the machine gun belt was in a round metal box, which was suspended from the machine gun under the receiver box. The calculation of the machine gun carried the box in special pouches, but at the same time each box also had its own folding handle designed for carrying. Also, the light machine gun was completed with fixed bipods, which were under the muzzle of the barrel. For carrying the weapon was completed with a belt. It was possible to fire “from the hip”, when the machine gun was located on the shoulder strap, and the shooter kept the RPD in the line of fire with his left hand, putting his left palm on the forend above, even for this the forearm was given a special shape.

The sights of the RPD consisted of a sector sight, whose pitch was 50 meters at a distance of up to 1000 meters, and a fly with side protection, which was mounted on a holder. The length of the weapon's sighting line was 596 mm. The light machine gun turned out to be a fairly light and durable weapon; it also stood out for its reliability, accuracy and unpretentiousness. The machine gun did not need constant technical inspection and was easy to operate and maintain. Transported a light machine gun on a belt with a folded and fixed with the help of a spring on the barrel bipod. The version called RPDM (modernized) differed from the original model of the machine gun in the shape of the gas piston and support, and when firing the reload lever remained in the forward position, in the version of the RPD it was connected to the bolt.

In contrast to the DP line machine guns, the new RPD machine gun had an irremovable barrel. The experience of the combat use of such weapons has demonstrated that usually fire is fired in short bursts, and the barrel without replacement allows you to spend all wearable ammunition. A spare barrel would always have to be in machine-gun design, which led to the weighting of the entire system, moreover, the design itself of a light machine gun equipped with a replaceable barrel was less reliable and more complex.




[justify] RD-44 light machine guns and RPD are well ahead of their time. The idea of ​​equipping infantry formations at the squad-platoon level with weapons only for an intermediate cartridge prevailed in the West only with their transition to low-impulse cartridges, which occurred in the 1960-1970's. At the same time, in Nazi Germany during the war years, the prospect of creating a light machine gun chambered for 7,92x33 mm was hardly worked out. In the Soviet Union, the RPD was one of the first models of small arms, specially created for the new intermediate cartridge 7,62х39 mm of the model 1943 of the year. From the beginning of the 1950-s and almost until the middle of the 1960-s, the FAP continued to remain the main support weapon at the branch level, and later began to be replaced in the army with the PKK, which was the preferred option in terms of unification. At the same time, RPD machine guns can still be found in army warehouses. Like many models of Soviet weapons of those years, the machine gun was widely exported, primarily to the friendly countries of the USSR, and also produced abroad, for example in China, under the designation Type 56.

As noted above, the shooting of the RPD machine gun was conducted with intermediate rounds of the 1943 model of the year. The arrows were available the following types of bullets: ordinary with a steel core, armor-piercing incendiary, incendiary and tracer. At the same time, the bullet maintained its killer effect at a distance of 1500 meters. The range of a direct shot from a weapon on a chest figure was equal to 365 meters. A machine gun fire on aerial targets could be conducted at a distance of up to 500 meters. The combat rate of fire of the RPD was up to 150 shots per minute, and maintaining intensive firing in bursts without cooling the barrel was possible before reaching the mark of 300 shots.

Performance characteristics of the RPD:

Caliber - 7,62 mm.
The cartridge - 7,62x39 mm.
Length - 1037 mm.
Barrel length - 520 mm.
Machine gun weight - 7,4 kg (with bipods and unfit tape), 9 kg (with curved tape).
Rate of Fire - 650-750 rds / min.
Combat Rate - 150 rds / min.
The initial speed of the bullet - 735 m / s.
Sighting range of shooting - 1000 m.
Effective firing range - 800 m.
Food - 100 tape on rounds in a metal box.



Information sources:
https://www.all4shooters.com/ru/strelba/osnovnye-novosti/K-100-letiyu-zavoda-imeni-V-A-Degtyareva-ot-Madsena-do-KORDa
http://www.zid.ru/company
http://world.guns.ru/machine/rus/degtyarov-rpd-r.html
http://rus-guns.com/pulemet-sistemy-degtyareva-rpd-obr-1944-g.html
Open source materials
31 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    22 September 2016 07: 01
    The second photo from "Maxim Perepelitsa".
  2. +10
    22 September 2016 07: 41
    I do not understand much in the shooter, but I heard the opinion that this unit was sent to retire early, replacing it with a PKK. Knowledgeable people believe that there is no light machine gun from the RPK, and the RPD machine is powerful and reliable, it would be better to remake it under 5,45 - we would get the Soviet M249.
    1. +3
      22 September 2016 08: 36
      I also heard about it when I served. but with the addition of that of the PKK. there are no decisive advantages.

      I think soon among the commentators there will be an expert who knows everything, constantly scolding Soviet weapons and will prove that this is a machine gun and a turd, and here Western analogues are the standard of excellence.
      1. avt
        +12
        22 September 2016 09: 36
        Quote: Alex_59
        Knowledgeable people believe that there is no light machine gun from the RPK, and the RPD machine is powerful and reliable,

        laughing
        Quote: Kostya Andreev
        that of the PKK. there are no decisive advantages.

        One of the main advantages of a light machine gun chambered for an intermediate cartridge is the absence of a belt and, at least, a reduction in weight. By the way, the same uss from the army precisely for the fact that you can stick the store in battle from a machine gun, and not fill the tape and set it as an example of the RPK, and the tapes to it connected two by 50 especially for the store, there is no particular advantage over the "snail" of the RPK give, but only complicate life when reloading. And if, still, the matter of everyday life, you lose the tape then?. "In the campaign, the needle weighs a pood" The second and most important thing is, "cost-efficiency." Namely, in mass production of army weapons it is easier to make line built by Grandfather Misha. This is his main merit - he created a SYSTEM from a machine gun to a machine gun. good The most pleasant thing to handle! "Soft" in work and accurate. Regarding replaceable barrels - frankly, they got it! The article correctly indicated
        The experience of the combat use of such weapons has demonstrated that usually fire is conducted in short bursts, and the barrel without replacement allows you to spend all the wearable ammunition. The spare barrel would always have to be in machine-gun calculation, which led to the weighting of the entire system, moreover, the very design of a light machine gun equipped with a replaceable barrel was less reliable and more complex.
        The second number isn’t for this unit! Well, load everything on a machine gunner ...... well, computer arrows - take a backpack, throw 30 kilograms into it and 10 kg dumbbell in your hands, and even a run, even if not time, and for the soul, jog. Then, when you catch your breath, we'll talk. bully
        1. +4
          22 September 2016 10: 23
          Quote: avt
          By the way, the same uss from the army precisely for the fact that you can stick the store in battle from a machine gun, and not fill the tape and set it as an example of the RPK, and the tapes to it connected two by 50 especially for the store, there is no particular advantage over the "snail" of the RPK give, but only complicate life when recharging.

          And how did it end? They went to meet the army team, adopted the "Belgian" under the universal food "store or tape". In theory, everything was fine. And as it came to practice, after a while it turned out that no one needed the shops - the machine gunners simply put on a short tape. And the spetsnaz M249 was completely thrown out of the opportunity to use the shops.
          1. +1
            22 September 2016 10: 49
            Quote: Alexey RA
            And as it came to practice, after a while it turned out that nobody needed the shops - the machine gunners just put a short tape.

            But what about the M27 IAR and the British seem to want something like that.
        2. +5
          22 September 2016 10: 36
          Again, this retrograde and malicious conservative avt spread rot fresh thought and the latest trends in small arms. Do not understand him the aesthetics of a machine gun under the tape. ETOGES, how beautiful it is to walk with a machine gun belt over your shoulder.
          1. avt
            +4
            22 September 2016 10: 52
            Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
            ETOGES, how beautiful it is to walk with a machine gun belt over your shoulder.

            Humming from the "Elusive avengers" - "You just whisper to us, and we will come to help!" laughing Yes. I am so - rude and not feminine. bully
            Quote: Alexey RA
            . In theory, everything was fine. And as it came to practice, after a while it turned out that nobody needed the shops - the machine gunners just put a short tape.

            laughingWell, just the same, "cut" laughing Current is what a misfortune - AND WHAT are the stores and what is the "short tape" ??? Like the PKK at 40? "Snail" is also not favored by everyone - it's hard to carry a spare. Again, in practice, in general, for the special forces, the competition was ordered with the terms of acceptance by the machine gun of the AK store. So in terms of unification, Grandfather Misha thought of everything for a century to come. Just learn to use.
            1. +4
              22 September 2016 11: 48
              Quote: avt
              Humming from the "Elusive avengers" - "You just whisper to us, and we will come to help!" laughing Yes. I am so - rude and not feminine. bully

              You can just go to the State Duma and click the shutter to say "Guard is tired." laughing
            2. +3
              22 September 2016 12: 10
              Quote: avt
              And what are the stores and what is the short tape ??? Like the PKK for 40?

              Shops are standard. Actually, this was what was considered the main advantage of the M249 - they say that when the tapes run out, it will be possible to rob colleagues, taking their stores for machine gun firing. smile In practice, however, everything turned out to be not so chocolate: for example, the marines had to add the following paragraph to the documents:
              As an emergency measure, 20 and 30 rounds of ammunition can be used in SAW, but this increases the likelihood of delays in firing.

              And it all ended up with the fact that after the M249 the army and the ILC wanted a machine gun. The story made a circle and returned to the BAR. smile
              1. avt
                +1
                22 September 2016 12: 38
                Quote: Alexey RA
                In practice, however, everything turned out to be not so chocolate: for example, the marines had to add the following paragraph to the documents:
                As an emergency measure, 20 and 30 rounds of ammunition can be used in SAW, but this increases the likelihood of delays in firing.

                Well, so the question for shops and the receiver on the machingan, on the PKK, this is brilliantly solved.
                Quote: Alexey RA
                The story made a circle and returned to the BAR.

                Well, John Moiseevich! request what do you want that !? However, if there was a choice - to shoot at the shooting range, then I would take "tar" without looking. good And if somehow somewhere ........ then of course the PKK. Maybe even with optics and a snail, well maybe two, as long as health is there to lug around with a backpack.
                1. 0
                  22 September 2016 13: 03
                  Quote: avt
                  Well, John Moiseevich! request what do you want that !? However, if there was a choice - to shoot at the shooting range, then I would take "tar" without looking. WEIGHT! Good And if somewhere somewhere ........ then of course the PKK. Maybe even with optics and a snail, well, maybe two, while health is to lug around with a backpack.

                  Have you seen RPK-16? I liked it, but it’s not clear why they are sawing a 96-round drum on it, 75 like the RPK, for me it’s just right and the drum is not too heavy and if it fails, the loss is not as critical as with 96.
                  1. avt
                    0
                    22 September 2016 13: 43
                    Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                    Have you seen RPK-16?

                    Only in the pictures. I heard that a variation on the theme of the 100th series.
                    Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                    but it’s not clear why they are sawing a 96-round drum on it,

                    Well, taking into account the short barrel - the order is really from the Ministry of Internal Affairs for "specific" tasks - assault groups, when there is no time to reload again, but the density of the fire must be kept. Somehow this is how the order for it is seen.
                    1. +1
                      22 September 2016 14: 12
                      Quote: avt
                      Well, taking into account the short barrel - the order is really from the Ministry of Internal Affairs for "specific" tasks - assault groups, when there is no time to reload again, but the density of the fire must be kept. Somehow this is how the order for it is seen.

                      Like it was said about the initiative development and different interchangeable trunks. Interchangeable trunks is more likely yes for the Ministry of Internal Affairs and other special forces. But in general, so that deceivers with expectations would not shout there, I liked the new AK. SVK, by the way, really liked it especially under the hostile bourgeois patron. smile
                2. +1
                  22 September 2016 13: 30
                  Quote: avt
                  Well, John Moiseevich! request why do you want something!?

                  I immediately recall Shooting some Sacred Cows - how there the army team since the introduction of the 5,56 mm regularly dreamed of returning back to the good old days from their .30. smile
                  Infantry: Luckily, I hear they're going back to the .30 before 1970.
                  Infantry: I Want .30 WANTWANTWANT! .thirty!
                  Infantry: Luckily they're going back to the .30 before 1980.
                  Infantry: Who cares? This is only temporary anyway. They're going back to the .30 before 1990.
                  Infantry: Aw, screw all of you! It's a good thing we're going back to .30 before 2000!
                  Infantry: Boy, I'll be glad when they go back to the .30 by 2010! Or at least that new 6.8, like the Brits came up with after WWII!
                  Infantry: Boy, it's a good thing they're going back to .30 by 2020!
              2. 0
                22 September 2016 14: 37
                In general, the Germans, when they developed the "Sturmgever", attended to the staff of the rifle department.
                And what’s most interesting, it was suggested at the suggestion of the front-line soldiers that the entire infantry squad (11 people) should be armed with the StG 44 - including the commander.
                Accordingly, MG42 went to the company and as a means of quality gain.
                In reality, of course, it didn’t come to that because of the small issue and it was necessary to arm basically only a few shooters + MG + the same 98K.
                The handbrake in the compartment was necessary for store and self-loading rifles, but whether it is needed for assault rifles is a question.
                For that matter, it would be more correct to introduce a single on the bipod to the department.
          2. +7
            22 September 2016 11: 07
            Yes, yes! It was chic for sailors from Aurora in 1917.
            And a metal tape tinkles when walking, and this diversifies the life of a special forces soldier behind enemy lines.
            1. 0
              24 September 2016 20: 47
              So respected among sailors from Aurora (and in general) the tapes were cloth)
    2. +4
      22 September 2016 08: 44
      Quote: Alex_59
      I do not understand much in the shooter, but I heard the opinion that this unit was sent to retire early, replacing it with a PKK. Knowledgeable people believe that there is no light machine gun from the RPK, and the RPD machine is powerful and reliable, it would be better to remake it under 5,45 - we would get the Soviet M249.

      Well, probably, the views prevailed that with the adoption of the AK, it would be more profitable to have a light machine gun, almost identical to an assault rifle. Certain losses in combat qualities are compensated by the simplicity and efficiency of production. Everywhere has its pros and cons request hi
      1. +4
        22 September 2016 09: 27
        Quote: Rurikovich
        Well, probably, the views prevailed that with the adoption of the AK, it would be more profitable to have a light machine gun, almost identical to an assault rifle. Certain losses in combat qualities are compensated by the simplicity and efficiency of production. Everywhere has its pros and cons

        And the unification of the type of ammunition? PKK can use stores from AK and vice versa. This is very important in battle. Plus, unification of components, which reduces the range and improves repair capabilities, plus training.
        1. +1
          22 September 2016 09: 44
          Well, it's the same smile Just sometimes too lazy to sit all the little things to paint. Indeed, in most cases, cost-effectiveness means unification wink hi
    3. +1
      22 September 2016 16: 17
      The PKK, with all the fairness of the above, has one, but a decisive advantage: it is deeply (almost completely) unified with a machine gun, the main armament of the infantry.

      And so, yes, the RPD had its advantages, the Czechs had a potentially good design, the Germans made their own alternatives. But - see above.

      Quote: Alex_59
      it would be better remade under 5,45

      By the time we introduced the 5,45 caliber, the RPD was long removed from service.
      1. 0
        29 November 2016 17: 19
        PKK and AK are the same only in the picture and in the device. And so, the PKK is another weapon. It is made much stronger and better. In it, except for trifles, everything is done differently. No wonder it is done in another factory. I doubt that there is complete interchangeability with AK.
        The receiver is different, much better and stronger. The shutter frame is also. The spring is different, the Trunk is completely different. Trigger mechanism - I remember already. The sight is different. What is left there? Pistol grip. Gas pipe and fore-end? Nutrition by itself.
    4. +1
      29 September 2016 00: 06
      the RPD has one main drawback, the lateral mounting of the box on the left side of the hull (and not in the center like a PC or "minimi" the same me249), that is, you will need a vertical compensation (hold) acre of vertical compensation (hold), otherwise the machine gun will be twist to the left, four kg is quite difficult to keep from "twisting" even from the bipod, so the version with 5.45 would have the same disadvantages
  3. 0
    22 September 2016 09: 37
    Degtyarev is a thing! In childhood - in the House of Pioneers there was a weapons circle: the two of us wore it from the gunsmith. And to cock the shutter only three of us (there were small ones). In conscript service: PKK and PKS, and they fired and dragged. But in the armory there were "tar" and ammunition for it.
    1. 0
      22 September 2016 16: 59
      We have an urgent 2 RPD were in the arms!
      In the case of amplification, they were dragged to the guardhouse along with cartridges - all had AK-74!
      By the way, about 2/3 of the officers and warrant officers were armed with TT. 1988-89 year.
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. +1
    22 September 2016 16: 22
    But how to find the previous articles of the cycle and, in general, articles of this author in the new, damn, forum engine?
  6. +2
    28 September 2016 23: 27
    there is a very huge minus in the RPD, the shift of the center of gravity to the left due to the left fastening from the bottom of the box, this shifts the recoil inertia not only vertically, but also horizontally down (on the side), the same circumstance was "owned" by the ancestor of the RPD, welted 7.62-54 DP with an upper disk arrangement, but unlike the RPD 7.62-39 DP had a significant lethal effect from the bipod, the RPK had only vertical oscillations during firing and the simplicity of the design as well as unification, nevertheless, as for the machine gunner in the squad, it is better to have a single PC welt 7.62-54, in the "Pecheneg" idial, they are devoid of horizontal instability and in terms of fire density, light machine guns are quite several times superior to handbrakes

    AP
  7. +2
    4 October 2016 17: 18
    The well-known drawback of RPD is its sensitivity to pollution, organically determined by the design itself, alas. RPK, with its short locking assembly, lugs of the rotating bolt, and "posted" bolt carrier was much, much more resistant to dirt!
    In addition, the old-school self-taught gunsmiths, for the most part, were adherents of solid-milled (a priori more massive and time-consuming than stamped-welded) receiver boxes, and the "proprietary" locking unit did not allow to lighten the degtyarev's box!