Tkachev AO-46 machine gun

27
Tkachev AO-46 machine gun


The Tkachev AO-46 machine gun, an experimental copy of which was released in the 1969 year, is almost the only development that was created not by the order of the USSR Government, allied ministries and departments, but on the personal initiative of the designer - gunsmith, employee of the Tkachev Central Precision Engineering Research Institute. P.A.
It is a lightweight automatic small-sized standard caliber 5,45 mm, ammunition which was supposed to be a unified shot 5,45 x 39 mm, which had a slight impulse. The developed model received a literal and digital designation AO-46.
It was intended to be used as a personal weapons those subunits and units whose servicemen are not directly involved in the firing contact with the enemy. The main requirements for this type of weapon are the immediate commencement of fire contact when targets are located at a distance of 200 meters with appropriate portable dimensions and light weight. Also important here is the factor of quickly setting in position for shooting and ease of carrying weapons.



Technical solutions applied by Tkachev

During the preliminary calculations and the creation of the project, the scientist determined that when shortening the barrel of an automaton from 415 mm to 210 mm, the initial speed of the shot is reduced by only 16%. This is numerically expressed as a decrease in the initial velocity from 880 to 735 m / s. Such speed indicators more than overlap the required target range, and allow us to count on a range of effective fire more than sufficient for this type of weapon. But with automatic fire from short-barreled systems, the unmasking symptom is a flame appearing from the muzzle, and excessive pressure on the walls of the trunk injures the organs of hearing of the machine gunner. These shortcomings were taken into account when creating a unique receiver nozzle with a volumetric expansion chamber for the output of powder gases. To give simplicity to the design of the weapon, the powder gases were removed directly from the receiver nozzle, which also played the role of a flame arrester.

Another ingenious engineering move was the placement of the store in the handle of the machine. To give a smaller overall size to the product, the ammunition is located at a large angle, but the action of mechanical forces in this case prevents the supply of a large number of cartridges. Reliability using this technical solution was achieved with an optimal magazine capacity - 15 cartridges.



The work of parts and mechanisms of the machine

Barrel channel closes on the hard type, using a rotating bolting system with two tides. In the machine gun Tkachev AO-46 applied trigger with a long drummer, which is designed to maintain both single shots and firing bursts. The stroke length of the impactor itself provides the necessary time for the mobile parts of the structure to be in the frontal position, which reduced the ellipse of ammunition dispersion when fired and increased the rate of fire of the product.
The three-position flag - the fire transfer mode safety lock is located above the trigger guard on the right side.
The sight is represented by the front sight and two-position entirely.
Metal stop for shoulder folding, located on the upper plane of the product, fixed by a stopper in the stowed position
The hands of the machine gunner are protected from burns when firing with wood overlays.
The Tkachev AO-46 machine gun for its time was a constructive novelty, which with honor passed all the test tests, including under extreme conditions. The reasons for not launching the product in the series are unknown. However, in 1973, during the implementation of the program called Modern, the main purpose of which was to adopt oversized weapons for SA, the government commission chose AKS-74U produced by the Kalashnikov bureau.

Tactical and technical data of the machine Tkachev AO-46
Product Caliber - 5,45-mm
Ammunition - 5,45 × 39 mm
Weight without magazine, kg 1,95
Length in shooting position with shoulder rest, mm 655
Length in the stowed position, mm 458
Barrel length, mm 245
Rate of fire, shots / min 700
Initial shot speed, m / s 715
Range (sighting), m 200.
27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    11 January 2012 10: 31
    Great domestic PDW of 1969. This is exactly what our tankers, helicopter pilots, aircraft pilots and artillery crews need as standard weapons.
    1. +2
      25 May 2012 10: 32
      I think that "Chestnut" or "Cypress" or "Gnome" will probably be better for this purpose. With the same aiming range, the stopping properties of a bullet are higher, by weight, about the same ... I'm thinking, why not make a Kalashnikov assault rifle chambered for TT? I don't think that ballistics will be worse than that of 5,45 caliber, with the same range of ammunition. As a matter of urgency, I had a chance to shoot at the BMD-1 hull from the PPSh, as a result, from a hundred steps, about half of the usual bullets pierced the hull FULL! the rest inside rattled like a rattle! And armor-piercing - so they went through almost everything!
  2. Alexey Prikazchikov
    -15
    11 January 2012 11: 48
    The most offensive is that this ram Kalashnikov ruined so many samples during the undercover fight.
    1. +2
      27 January 2012 12: 35
      I do not know machine guns Mr. Alexey Prikazchikov.............
      it's like a comment on my minus.
    2. laurbalaur
      +1
      5 March 2012 18: 01
      Tupolev, too, buried many projects, but this does not detract from his contribution (as well as the contribution of Kalashnikov) to building up the defense capability of the USSR. You, Mr. Prikazchikov, should not stoop to trivial insults!
  3. Tyumen
    +8
    11 January 2012 13: 06
    Another ingenious engineering move was the placement of the clip in the handle of the machine
    In my opinion, not a clip in the handle, but a store instead handles.
    1. 0
      11 January 2012 14: 15
      By the way, it's a good idea - the "handle" is more or less of normal width.
  4. dred
    +2
    11 January 2012 14: 53
    The Swedes had the same experience.
    http://world.guns.ru/assault/swed/interdynamics-mks-r.html
    1. Tyumen
      0
      11 January 2012 19: 17
      And with the same fate.
  5. grizzlir
    -1
    11 January 2012 14: 58
    An interesting weapon, I can’t judge the reliability, in terms of tergonomics it’s better than the Kalashnikov shortening. Although there is a lack of a full handle, the grip on the store is clearly uncomfortable and the capacity of the store is not enough.
    1. wk
      0
      11 January 2012 15: 32
      Quote: grizzlir
      An interesting weapon, I can’t judge the reliability, in terms of tergonomics it’s better than the Kalashnikov shortening. Although there is a lack of a full handle, the grip on the store is clearly uncomfortable and the capacity of the store is not enough.





      Kalash also has a firing range of more than 500 against 200, so that in the army he would give preference to AKSU, and this one is not bad for the police.
    2. wk
      +1
      11 January 2012 15: 37
      Quote: Nova
      Great domestic PDW of 1969. This is exactly what our tankers, helicopter pilots, aircraft pilots and artillery crews need as standard weapons.

      Quote: grizzlir
      An interesting weapon, I can’t judge the reliability, in terms of tergonomics it’s better than the Kalashnikov shortening. Although there is a lack of a full handle, the grip on the store is clearly uncomfortable and the capacity of the store is not enough.

      Kalash has a longer firing range of 500 versus 200, so for the army I prefer AKSU 74, and this one is suitable for the police.
      1. +5
        11 January 2012 16: 18
        2wk

        I doubt that the AKS-74U is really effective at a range of 500 meters. The barrel of the AO-46 is 245 mm versus 210 mm of the AKS-74U, the cartridge is the same, so a very big question is which is preferable. The reliability of the AO-46 is unclear, but I think that if it had been adopted, it would certainly have been brought to mind, because the same AKS-74U was also brought up after release. Well, and in terms of dimensions, the AO-46 is clearly preferable to the AKS-74U for the combat arms that I listed in my first post.
        Yes, and at the expense of the police - the submachine gun cartridge is too harsh, the permeability is high, killing a terrorist in an apartment with a burst of AKS-74U / AO-46, you risk shooting hostages behind the wall. Therefore, the police of all countries prefer 9 mm with a high stopping effect, but low bullet permeability. The 5.7 mm FN P 90 is excellent in my opinion, but, you see, it is not used by all the police in the world, not least because of its "piercing" caliber. The H&K MP 7 with its 4.6 mm is still exotic in general, especially since it is positioned exactly as a PDW - that is, it is initially focused on the army. So AO-46 is not very suitable for police operations.

        Sincerely.
        1. wk
          +3
          12 January 2012 04: 46
          Quote: Nova
          The barrel of the AO-46 245 mm vs 210 mm AKS-74U,

          in addition to the length of the barrel and cartridge, the shutter design, energy intensity of the reload mechanism, balancing mechanisms can influence the firing range and accuracy ... of course the general armament of the Soviet and Russian Army AK can be attributed to lobbying M. Kalashnikov, but the popularity of all AKs abroad can only be explained by him exploitation - fighting qualities, but on the issue of militia - the police will probably agree with you, I note that for the traffic police, for example, it is preferable to an AK from which they will not refuse, unlike the Ministry of Internal Affairs, police officers.
  6. 755962
    +1
    11 January 2012 15: 18
    Tkachev's answer Uziel Galyu.Tot ("Uzi") is still in the army, but what is ours?
  7. Boot under the carpet
    +10
    11 January 2012 15: 57
    755962, sighting range 200m, here is the answer to your question. At one time, our major of the red army said the following words about Uzi: "If you let the evil Israeli army closer to you than 200 meters, while you are holding AK, then you are full M"
    1. 755962
      +4
      11 January 2012 18: 32
      My respect to you
    2. +2
      11 January 2012 21: 11
      Quote: Boot under the carpet
      while you hold AK, then you are full M "


      It was he who got excited about the ultrasound, there are enough shortcomings, a straight pistol grip, which serves as a nest for the store at the same time, makes this weapon not very convenient for "instinctive" shooting from one hand or from outstretched arms. The same applies to the holding of weapons during firing with both hands, without using the shoulder rest in the “Mini-Ultrasound”. A high rate of fire, as a result - over-expenditure of ammunition (this drawback is generally characteristic of simple submachine guns).
      The full-size UZI is heavier than the AKC or HK MP5 due to the thick walls of the receiver.
      The grip points (forend, handle) next to each other at the full-sized UZI do not allow the shooter's hands to dampen vibrations when firing.
      UZI has poor hit accuracy due to high recoil

      A sighting and effective firing range, you see, things are different, the ultrasound has an effective range of 100 m, the mini ultrasound has -50
      1. +1
        12 January 2012 02: 30
        Quote: Boot under the carpet
        Israel’s army is closer than 200 meters to you while you are holding AK
        :) smiled, knowledge of military affairs is impressive.
        Quote: Vadivak
        firing from one hand or from outstretched arms. The same applies to holding a weapon during firing with both hands, without using a shoulder rest
        - Why are you watching any movies ???? - today even glock butt is buttered for the sake of effective shooting, in Israel ultrasound without butt has somehow been thought of.
        Quote: Vadivak
        The full-size UZI is heavier than the AKC or HK MP5 due to the thick walls of the receiver.
        The grip points (forend, handle) next to each other at the full-sized UZI do not allow the shooter's hands to dampen vibrations when firing.
        UZI has poor hit accuracy due to high recoil
        - nonsense mixed ...... firstly, again, butt, secondly, the forend / hilt distance in any modern bullap system, it is no more ...... BUTT.
        the most important thing is return, well, you can take a word from personal experience ..... a full-size ultrasound has zero return ....
        about accuracy there is such a moment only you forgot that the ultrasound is not in the category of machine guns but a machine gun. for close range combat and urban areas a good machine.
  8. Boot under the carpet
    +1
    11 January 2012 21: 22
    You didn't understand me a little. With that officer there was a conversation about the small arms of the countries of the world. Ultrasound also got it. He lowered this machine below the baseboard. And "M" he considers those who will allow the troops (armed with ultrasound) to approach closer than two hundred meters. PS Well, it is clear that ultrasound in the troops is not an option at all.
    1. +1
      11 January 2012 21: 42
      Quote: Boot under the carpet
      You didn’t understand me a bit.


      Well, sorry, it’s about the same thing.
    2. 0
      12 January 2012 02: 44
      and what did your officer squint a lot from the adversary’s machine from distances of 200 m ???
      But seriously, the statements of your officer are more like the statements of the ensign)))
  9. Splin
    -1
    11 January 2012 21: 33
    The 5,45 cartridge was developed in the 71st. Most likely, this model of the machine was first developed under 7,62. And for this type of arrangement of automation, this cartridge is too powerful. Because he was not given the green light.
  10. sealord
    0
    12 January 2012 11: 35
    Comparison of the combat capabilities of the machine and n \ n - smacks of idiocy.
    Israel is fine with small arms - Tavor TAR-21. They had already eaten American rifle shit, and they were tired of modernizing Kalash (they ran into the bottom — we needed a bullpup), and to create something like ADF — the design and engineering level had not yet been accumulated.
  11. sealord
    +1
    12 January 2012 11: 40
    Comparison of the combat capabilities of the machine and n \ n - smacks of idiocy.
    Israel is fine with small arms - Tavor TAR-21. They had already eaten American rifle shit, and they were tired of modernizing Kalash (they ran into the bottom — we needed a bullpup), and to create something like ADF — the design and engineering level had not yet been accumulated.
  12. +2
    12 January 2012 16: 07
    Great machine.
    I thought ...
    Magazine / handle is not very convenient and only 15 rounds ....
    But if you imagine it, let's say with a cartridge 5,7x28 (P90 + FiveSeven).
    A completely competitive joke is obtained despite the age.
  13. iulai
    -2
    14 January 2012 19: 36
    there were two inventors in the USSR who did more harm than good — Kalashnikov and Tupolev, thieves in their field!
  14. gotmog
    0
    12 March 2012 21: 54
    Even Yakovlev was like that — the deputy commissar for experimental aircraft construction (I could be wrong) —bucked Polikarpov I-185. And there were more. We need new ideas - history does not tolerate the subjunctive mood ...
  15. 0
    14 May 2012 11: 02
    It’s a pity, a good machine wasn’t realized, it would be just right for the Ministry of Internal Affairs - 15 rounds are enough (the cops often don't shoot like adults), small-sized (less than the AK-74U), fast-firing, low weight (lighter than the AK-74U ), good rate of fire, does not hammer on the ears - that’s it! (Izhmash’s machinations?)
  16. toppler
    0
    15 June 2012 16: 43
    This is my grandfather’s machine gun. Today he was buried. Everlasting memory.
  17. Michael HORNET
    +1
    22 October 2012 17: 33
    The design is interesting, but really stillborn.
    For humans, they make weapons, not for mutants - such a "handle" is inconvenient
    Butt on top - you can’t put optics or a collimator, which makes life easier especially for those who can’t shoot well (since ideologically it’s PDV)
    Ammo is not enough, like in a pistol, but it is large for a pistol
    In general, a place for him in the series of technical oddities and use the work achieved in other weapons
  18. 0
    26 February 2013 15: 44
    By
    Quote: Michael HORNET
    such a "handle" is inconvenient

    Who has some kind of "paw": for some to grasp such a handle - just right.


    Quote: Michael HORNET
    you can not put optics or a collimator

    Forgot in what years this product was designed?
    And what kind of optics for weapons of this class?

    Butt is - already good.
    And to "fasten the LCC" - a lot of mind is not needed.
    For ultrasound, they came up with a simple device.
  19. SAFON 1
    0
    12 November 2013 17: 50
    Greed and thirst for dough ruined many projects of really necessary and more advanced weapons than the AK. The "genius" seventh-grader locksmith, who was promoted by Soviet propaganda, closed the way for truly original and talented gunsmiths for a long time. MO RF is now an office that is not much different from others, squeezing bribes and kickbacks. And they do not care about shitty weapons and ammunition going to the troops, kickbacks - kickbacks and "gifts" are the best "lubricant" for a positive decision. This is what one should try to foist, so that even bribe-takers would refuse it!
  20. 0
    23 May 2016 13: 34
    A horn with cartridges instead of a handle - this is inconvenient during firing - one of the main criteria is violated - the weapon should be comfortable, a horn with only 15 rounds and automatic fire does not fit well. AKS-74U is an order of magnitude higher for the stated purposes of this weapon.