Aircraft of the American coalition again "missed", inflicting another blow to the positions of the Syrian armed forces

232
The spokesman for the Ministry of Defense of the Syrian Arab Republic, Brigadier General Ali Mayhub, told the media that aviation the so-called American anti-terrorist coalition once again strangely “missed” and dealt a blow to the Syrian military. And again the blow fell on the positions of the SAR Armed Forces in the province of Deir ez-Zor. As a result of the air raid, three Syrian soldiers were killed and at least thirty were injured.

Aircraft of the American coalition again "missed", inflicting another blow to the positions of the Syrian armed forces


RIA News cites the statement of the Syrian general:
While our troops repel attacks by the DAISH (ISIL) terrorists in the eastern zone, the US-led coalition planes attacked one of our troops’s positions in Deir-ez-Zor, which resulted in the death of three servicemen and the wounding of thirty, as well as the destruction of weapons, military and special equipment and facilities.


This is the second “miss” of the so-called coalition planes, which resulted in a blow to the positions of the Syrian government forces. Last Sunday, in the province of Deir ez-Zor, three Syrian fighters were victims of air raids of coalition aircraft led by the United States, and 16 were injured.

It is hardly possible to call a NATO aircraft strike against the positions of the armed forces of the SAR accident or coincidence. All this is reminiscent of a planned action on the implementation of the United States and allied tasks, which are least of all associated with the real struggle against international terrorism.
232 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Vadimsh Rank
    Vadimsh
    +1
    13 December 2015 04: 33
    we turn around the words of the NATO Secretary General - Turkey has the right to defend its territorial integrity - Syria has the right to shoot down NATO planes violating airspace - there is neither a mandate nor an official invitation, what are they doing there?
  2. vik14025 Rank
    vik14025
    0
    13 December 2015 05: 38
    Let's try point by point:
    1. Why did the Americans begin to bomb the SA unit right here and right now?
    If we take as a basis the version about a group of our Special Forces that caused a big mess for the CIA (there are no other sane versions yet), the question arises whether they achieved their goal or not. The answer is that they were more likely to succeed if the amers had to use aviation as a last resort to hide their tails, knowing that in information terms we would not abandon this.
    Further, if we accept the version about the warning of our Aerospace Forces, which was in time, our Special Forces group a) completed the task, b) left without losses, c) forced the amers to get involved in a scandal with the bombing of the SA, and it doesn’t matter whether the scandal turns out to be a big one or a small one.
    What did the Americans get as a result? Apparently, the disruption of some operation or program, because of which it is acceptable to create an international scandal, and, well, a scandal itself.
    And who has the advantage here?
    The question is: why don’t the SA air defenses work?
    Answer: Daesh, by definition, does not have aviation, i.e. targets for air defense, and everyone who flies over Syria is either allies (Russian Federation), or not allies, but someone who declares their goal to be the fight against Daesh like the American KALLITIA. THOSE. again no goals. For whom to work? And no one is immune from the excesses of the performer.
    We sort of understand that the amers have other goals, and to achieve these goals, the excesses of the performer are the only lifeline. But from a legal perspective, everything looks exactly as described above.
    Those who understand will draw their own conclusions.
  3. behemot Rank
    behemot
    0
    13 December 2015 07: 55
    shoot down, shoot the flyer in the air, and that’s the whole problem, or even better, cut off the head.
  4. Flash Rank
    Flash
    0
    13 December 2015 08: 47
    Do you really think that if the Syrian Arab Republic shoots down one coalition plane, a no-fly zone will be imposed over Syria? Will more coalition planes arrive and start bombing SAR positions? This won't happen. They can shoot down one, which means they can shoot down two and ten. Syria itself can declare a no-fly zone. If Syria has the S-300 and especially the S-400 air defense systems, no one will bomb it, it will cost themselves more.
    Turkey has no right to close the straits through which Syria is supplied in peacetime, because The Montreux Convention prohibits, and if it does close it, then this is a direct declaration of war, and during wartime the warring parties wanted to sneeze at these conventions, and closed straits will be opened by any means.
  5. Foxbed Rank
    Foxbed
    0
    13 December 2015 09: 56
    Quote: Volka
    it's time to punish the "blind" for such things ...


    Hehe... Only the grave can straighten a blind man like a hunchback... wink
  6. Avantageur Rank
    Avantageur
    0
    13 December 2015 12: 06
    Use “backpacks” to knock down all their manned groups, so that the damned ones don’t fly and don’t contribute to the terrorists...
  7. Balagan Rank
    Balagan
    0
    13 December 2015 13: 21
    Maybe it’s time for the Syrians to also miss the coalition?..
  8. iouris Rank
    iouris
    0
    13 December 2015 13: 41
    Who said that ISIS, which trades in cheap oil, does not have aviation? There just isn’t enough of it, so it acts on the sly, masquerading as NATO.
    Ground forces located far from the S-400 must be covered by fighters and military air defense.
  9. rus-5819 Rank
    rus-5819
    0
    13 December 2015 14: 07
    This is the second “miss” of the so-called coalition aircraft, as a result of which the positions of the Syrian government troops were hit.

    Does anyone have any doubts that the striped ones are doing this on purpose? Personally, I don’t! The so-called “kacalitsiya” with their “most powerful reconnaissance” satellite tracking systems and UAVs should not make such inept mistakes.
  10. Good_Mih Rank
    Good_Mih
    0
    13 December 2015 16: 14
    planes attacking government forces are considered hostile...
  11. March Rank
    March
    +1
    13 December 2015 17: 12
    What the heck!!! Why did we bring the S-300 and S-400 to Syria? Urgently try it out!!
  12. Nirvanko
    Nirvanko
    0
    13 December 2015 18: 13
    Superpowers behave like rats: stealthily and weakly.

    In general, Russia’s weakness here is that they did not go all the way: it was necessary, from the position of the Syrian government, to officially close the sky immediately after the start of the campaign.
  13. DPN Rank
    DPN
    0
    13 December 2015 18: 51
    The scoundrels are sitting overseas, so they can afford to miss, it’s not REAL to punish them for this, but it’s a shame!
  14. Mountain spacecraft Rank
    Mountain spacecraft
    0
    13 December 2015 18: 51
    Who would doubt it. And this is not the last mistake.
  15. Egor123 Rank
    Egor123
    0
    13 December 2015 18: 54
    That's scum.........
    They want to weaken Assad’s army, and at this time strengthen their Syrian Free Army with the supply of weapons and training while Assad’s army is fighting.
  16. archimer Rank
    archimer
    0
    13 December 2015 21: 58
    For the Soviet Union, even cooks fought with axes!
  17. Orionvit Rank
    Orionvit
    0
    13 December 2015 23: 23
    Quote: subbtin.725
    All the same vile tactics on the verge of a foul.

    Someone once talked about a no-fly zone. Why weren't they shot down?