Ukraine has stopped the supply of military equipment for the Russian Federation

202
Ukraine has stopped the supply of military equipment for the Russian Federation


Deputy Defense Minister Yuri Borisov made several important statements today, speaking on the Russian Service radio station News".
The official in charge of re-equipment of the army in the military department confirmed that the new Kiev authorities had banned the supply of defense products to our country.

"Since March, regulatory documents have been issued in Ukraine that prohibit the supply of weapons, military equipment and components for enterprises of the Russian defense industry. In fact, goods have accumulated at customs, in most cases paid and provided up to 80 percent, which we cannot receive," Borisov.

He believes that such a policy will hit primarily Ukrainian enterprises, which will find it difficult to find other markets for their products. At the same time, the Deputy Minister of Defense is sure: despite some difficulties, Russian enterprises will successfully cope with this challenge. “We have to practically reconsider all positions across the entire depth of cooperation. You can’t transfer an airplane without landing gear,” he explained and recalled that the annual volume of deliveries to Russia of products of Ukrainian defense enterprises is about 50 billion rubles.

Once again, Borisov returned to the topic of Ukraine in connection with the situation in Crimea. He said that it was decided to use the specialized enterprises of the peninsula in fulfilling the state defense order. The Ministry of Defense has already conducted an audit of all Crimean defense industries. Some of them had previously worked for the Russian defense industry. In particular, this refers to the 13th shipyard, which, according to an intergovernmental agreement, our country leased from Ukraine to fulfill orders for the repair of Black Sea ships fleet.

Borisov said that the military units deployed in the Crimea will supply the latest technology. It will require maintenance throughout the life cycle. Therefore, enterprises engaged in this process will be busy for a long time. As for the Ukrainian military equipment remaining on the peninsula, Russian generals and admirals are not going to appropriate it. Moreover, there is nothing to leave - the best weapons released in the 1989 year. Our military is gradually returning this entire arsenal to the Ukrainians.

And in the Russian defense industry, they have already returned the institution of military acceptance. Borisov said that the number of this structure today is 25 thousand people. The work of military representatives is already bringing results. For example, the volume of complaints at the end of last year decreased by almost one and a half times.

Borisov also spoke of a new heavy liquid intercontinental ballistic missile being developed for the Strategic Missile Forces. The deputy minister called her "unique weapons"there is no one like it in the USA.

"He is seriously afraid. In its payload, the new missile will be able to carry such means of overcoming missile defense and have such a reserve in power engineering that it can fly through the North Pole and through the South Pole," the Deputy Minister of Defense added. in parts. "

Speaking about weapons updates in general, Borisov emphasized that the developments that our defense industry enterprises are implementing today, according to their characteristics, are ready, at a minimum, to argue with their foreign counterparts.

"Today we do not put on the contracting of work, which are inferior to foreign models. There is no sense," the official explained.

This approach fully applies to promising marine technology for the Navy. In particular - to aircraft carriers cruisers. Borisov said that in the interests of our military fleet in the Central Research Institute of them. Krylov developed three projects of such ships with a nuclear power plant. However, the current state armaments program does not provide for their construction. Will they be in the future? The official answered evasively to this question: "They may be." The deputy minister explained that the construction of aircraft carriers relates to the implementation of military doctrine.

Borisov reminded that in May the country's leadership approved a long-term shipbuilding program. This document focuses on unification issues in the industry and eliminates interference with the implementation of the military-technical policy of the commanders or someone else. The objectives of the program are to reduce the type and on the principles of reasonable sufficiency to ensure the safety of our maritime boundaries of the near and far maritime zones. In addition, according to the official, the ships should have a longer period of active existence - at least 50 years instead of the current 30.

It is clear that all this and much more in our country is being done under existing and prospective threats to the Russian state. Including, from America. "A number of research and development work is being carried out in the context of possible threats related to the deployment of global impact using the hypersonic technology of the United States," Borisov did not hide.

Recall that the US military initiative "Lightning Global Strike" involves the creation of offensive weapons systems that are able to strike with non-nuclear weapons on any part of the planet within an hour after the decision is made. It is assumed that the main components of the initiative will be deeply modified intercontinental ballistic missiles, hypersonic cruise missiles, as well as weapons based on new physical principles.
202 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    2 June 2014 08: 32
    Yes, it’s old, of course, from 1989, but with proper repairs it will probably be able to shoot and drive in the South-East better than to help our people than to give it to these dill.
  2. 0
    2 June 2014 11: 48
    About Ukrainian military equipment.
    I’m certainly not an expert on armored vehicles, but their tuned armored personnel carriers with birdhouses instead of turrets make me smile.
  3. Gexzloy
    0
    2 June 2014 12: 49
    They think if they stop supplying engines to Russia, this will reduce the likelihood of an invasion.
    Naive.
  4. Bormental
    0
    2 June 2014 18: 11
    Ensure contracts are fulfilled by taking over production.
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. +1
    3 June 2014 00: 33
    I’m reading it and again I’m shocked...again hundreds of thousands of applications are pouring in and they’ll die on their own, we’re all at home, we don’t give a damn...
    Let's start with politics... we fought for loyalty... we lost. Fight in the standard way - carrot and stick... it seems like you won against the president, lost to your opponent (sponsors of the Maidan)
    Crimea was won (at the same time losing the loyalty of all of Ukraine in the eyes of “their” loyal Ukrainians) Ukraine was given away without engaging in battle.
    Remember how America fought, it seemed to be God knows where, but it was on the Maidan, they spoke every day, they constantly said that something was unacceptable and if this was done, then the person who did it would have specific problems. Was? Was. Was there political economic pressure? There was direct intervention.
    Whoever wanted it more won. He invested where necessary, put pressure where necessary, reached an agreement with the right person, and most importantly, did not let go for a second.
    In general, whoever tried the most got it. Of course, as a Ukrainian, I am ashamed that we did not decide our fate ourselves (although many people think that this is the will of the people) and if you believe this site, the Russian Federation is a pole of power, which means 2 poles fought battles.. .But the fact remains a fact. The United States invested more, tried, and most importantly POLITICALLY and ECONOMICALLY put pressure on the head of government for the desired result. Tirelessly, every day, without fear, right in Kyiv.
    Having won the battle, and at the same time getting the desired result during the war. Now Crimea is precisely the thorn that has finally divided Ukraine and the Russian Federation. Now all the crazy suicidal acts in the form of refusals to work, to sell products of the Russian Federation, in general to deal even with relatives in the Russian Federation, even while working in the Russian Federation to hold a grudge against Russians - they are real. People are embittered, they didn’t even make an enemy - he came himself. The fairy tale became reality....the insidious Russians.....took advantage of our disorder"
    In general, what am I talking about?
    What did the Russian Federation gain?
    Crimea.
    What did Russia lose?
    Loyalty to Ukraine. Its neutral status (now everyone wants to join NATO), understanding even of relatives, entry into the Customs Union (this is already disgusting for everyone)
    in general, hatred of those closest to you is the most terrible thing... it is stronger than economic losses.
    In general, if apart from the comments - “they themselves will die and we will survive”, there are no more options, I propose to evacuate the Russians, build a high concrete fence, pillboxes, minefields and Iskander positions, and strengthen the border... You don’t care about the result of the battle for Ukraine , all that matters to you is understanding your greatness and self-sufficiency! And I don’t care that we’re losing hundreds of kilometers! And it doesn’t matter that it’s possible to lose someone or something. We are great and self-sufficient. We’ll throw our bast shoes... our hats... but seriously, we’re even giving away the zone of close influence, where a lot has been invested, both the market for the same gas and our former people.
    What's next? You can follow the principle - we don’t care about Murmansk - they won’t live without us, and we don’t care about Vladivostok, it won’t live without us... Oh, we don’t care about the Moscow region - we will live in Moscow.. We don’t care about the neighboring street...
    Sorry, but no one in their right mind would give up the near zone... without it, “the enemy is at the gate”
    By the way, regarding the bans, Ukraine does not export weapons themselves to the Russian Federation, but only components. And yes, I went through 4 pages of Google and only found one source. And Ukrainians also refer to it. In general, the situation is like with Red October in Odessa. You write that it is prohibited, Google writes about it, and we are shipping regular orders to customers in Ukraine...
    But the suicidal mood in terms of the refusal of the Russian Federation even among the people is concrete... Over this year I have generally seen how in a couple of weeks you can lose the trust of millions... loyalty in a week...
    1. +3
      3 June 2014 00: 46
      Quote: Cristall
      What's next? You can follow the principle - we don’t care about Murmansk - they won’t live without us, and we don’t care about Vladivostok, it won’t live without us... Oh, we don’t care about the Moscow region - we will live in Moscow.. We don’t care about the neighboring street...

      Maybe enough hysterics?
      "...You're from Odessa, Mishka.
      And that means..."
      THAT generation of Odessa residents, to whom L. Utesov’s song was addressed, is gone completely and irrevocably.
      And don't confuse loyalty with brotherly help.
      Residents of the non-zalezhnaya exchanged their loyalty for promises of a happy life under NATO supervision to spite the “enemy at the gates.”
  7. 0
    3 June 2014 07: 36
    We found something to scare... Look, who remembers the electric trains with the proud "RVR" sign? And where is that nice enterprise now??? - Everything, for fuck’s sake, has collapsed in Latvia, only Dzintars has been revived, but this is perfumery, you can’t build an economy on it. So Ukraine drove its steam locomotive wherever its eyes looked... And we ourselves began to produce electric trains, and everything else that is strategically important will also have to be done ourselves, if possible,
  8. 0
    3 June 2014 10: 08
    All this is just a belated result of the fall of the USSR!!! It should have been a long time ago to transfer strategically important production to our defense enterprises and not to assemble helicopters by 3 countries in which the puppeteers rule! I'm certainly not for isolation, but definitely for the Iron Curtain in some areas!
  9. 0
    3 June 2014 10: 13
    But in general! Stop forgiving debts, stop issuing loans in money!!!!! We need to help with “cookies” and not with money! and our "confectioners" in chocolate!
  10. 0
    3 June 2014 11: 18
    Quote: Suhow
    turn very many do not give a damn, just a lot of people were led by all garbage, others were offended by the Crimea.

    But it was inappropriate to provoke by banning the Russian language and expelling the Black Sea Fleet from Sevastopol! Now you can be offended as much as you want. We also grieved when, during the collapse of the USSR, Crimea went to Ukraine.
  11. The comment was deleted.
  12. The comment was deleted.
  13. 0
    3 June 2014 17: 25
    Just to spite Russia...
  14. 0
    3 June 2014 18: 24
    I re-read the article again - the wording is still not correct - it should be like this: Russia stops purchasing military equipment from Ukraine. soldier
  15. Chaves
    0
    3 June 2014 20: 12
    Gas wasted, Coal too
    Now Defense Industry
    What are you going to live for?
    Loans don't last forever
  16. Grandfather Victor
    0
    3 June 2014 20: 53
    “Our military is gradually returning this entire arsenal to the Ukrainians.”
    Right. Otherwise, the Ukronazis don’t have enough weapons to kill people in Novorossiya!