The head of the Moscow community of the Crimean Tatars: "Russian - former slaves, hereditary slaves." On the threat of the revival of the Crimean Tatar predator

Crimean Tatars forgot about historical lessons of 1783 and 1944 Instead of living quietly in the Crimean lands, which they might not have seen, they again actively join the ranks of the enemies of Russian civilization and the Russian people. The head of the Moscow fraternity of the Crimean Tatars called the Russians “hereditary slaves”, and his relatives in the Crimea actively oppose plans to return Crimea to the bosom of a united Russia.

Recently, the head of the Moscow community of the Crimean Tatars Ernst Kudusov publicly announced Russian "hereditary slaves." Mr. Kudusov did not make this statement anywhere in the kitchen with his associates, but during his speech on the Russian Public Television. This fact well shows all the freedom that all kinds of representatives of the so-called “fifth column” have in the Russian Federation. They openly form the information field of the country in favor of Western and Islamic projects.

Kudusov, answering the question of the presenter, how much the Crimean peninsula, in his opinion, is divided between the "Russian-speaking" and the Crimean Tatar population, said: "We will have to turn to history a little bit." According to him, “the Crimean Tatar people are an indigenous people” and this is a repressed people. In the 1944 year in Crimea, “not a single Crimean Tatar was left. Stalin decided to destroy the Crimean Tatars because this is not a servile people, he never knew slavery. But Stalin was used to controlling slaves. Therefore, he really liked the Russians - former slaves, hereditary slaves. Millennial slavery, you can’t do anything here. ”

According to Kudusov, currently the Crimean Tatar population is being helped by hostility between Ukrainians and Russians. The “Russian-speaking” population is in favor of joining the Crimea to Russia. But neither the Ukrainians nor the Crimean Tatars "will not want this and will in every way impede this," said the head of the Moscow association of the Crimean Tatars.

Kudusov repeated those “black myths” that were stuffed by our people during the years of “perestroika” and the victory of “liberalism” (in fact, liberal-fascism) in 1991 year. This is the myth of the "natural slavery" of Russians (The black myth of the "Russian slavery"), his “millennial slavery”, “innocently repressed” Crimean Tatars, etc.

However, historical facts say that the Russian people have never been a slave. A slave by nature is cowardly, cruel and greedy. This is especially true of the “natural slave,” that is, the one who has already been born a slave. Former free warrior Spartak gave the Roman slave system a real battle. The Russian people, as history shows, are a warrior people, a laborer, an ascetic and creator.

The “centuries-old slavery” of the Russian people is a myth that is used in the information war against Russia. Thus, the well-known serfdom, which was established in the XVIII century (therefore, the distributors of the idea of ​​a “thousand-year-old slavery” were lying from the very beginning), was not a classic slavery that was spread in the West. Serfdom was a system that had to be created to ensure national security and independence of the country. Russia lived for centuries in conditions of constant wars, one invasion followed another. A system was needed that would keep society in constant mobilization. The state treasury could not draw huge military spending. Therefore, one part of the population pulled the state service, mainly military, and had to close the vital centers of Russia with a breast at any moment. Another part of the population carried a tax - a set of duties and taxes, with the help of which they fed the landowners (warriors) and supported the state economy. In essence, everyone was “serfs” - and the landowners, who, at the first call of the sovereign, had to stand in line and shed blood in the fight against enemies, give their lives for the Motherland, and the peasantry, the townspeople, and the sovereign, who had served Russia all his life to the people. Such a system was a vital necessity in the context of constant geopolitical tensions and wars on the northwestern, western, southern and eastern borders.

This system degenerated only to the 1762 year, when the Manifesto on the Freedom of the Nobility was adopted (“On granting freedom and freedom to the entire Russian nobility”). The manifesto was signed during his short reign by Emperor Peter III and approved in 1785 by Empress Catherine II (“Letters to the Nobility”). One of the main elements of the system, the nobility, was exempt from compulsory 25-year civil or military service, could resign before the end of his service life and go abroad. Nobles in the Russian Empire became a "freestyle gentry." The peasants were not exempt from service. The justice of the system was destroyed. Moreover, in almost all emperors, beginning with Catherine the Great, they developed projects for the liberation of the peasantry from serfdom, but did not dare to carry out a reform. Russia could not afford the "freedom" and individualism of the West. To survive and grow, the unity of society was necessary.

In addition, it is worth noting the fact that not all the peasants were serfs. In the 19th century, the percentage of serfdom was constantly falling. According to the 10 audit of 1858, the proportion of serfs in the entire population of Russia decreased to 37%. Many areas never knew serfdom, or the percentage of serfs there was very small.

We must not forget that the serfs were never slaves, "speaking instruments", as in the West and its colonies. In particular, among the serfs there was a group of serf millionaires. Millionaire peasants were richer than their official owners and even lent them money.

With serious mistakes of the management corps, the peasants responded with large-scale peasant wars, dozens of riots and uprisings. "Russian slaves" broke the backbone of the most famous world conquerors, "invincible warriors", "people of the first grade." The Russian people destroyed the legions of Napoleon, the European hordes of Hitler, saved the planet from an inferno breakthrough in the Third Reich, saved the planet from new large-scale wars for decades. "Hereditary slaves" were able to create and protect from enemies the biggest power on planet Earth.

Stalin knowingly “liked the Russians very much”: they are the imperial people, the warrior people and the toilers. With good governance, Russians are capable of real miracles that hit the whole world. Parasites and predators are covered in cold sweat, and honest people look at Russia with hope when Russians remind all of humanity that good always triumphs over evil.

Representatives of the Crimean Tatars would have long since become good neighbors for the Russian people - yes, precisely a long time ago, even after the defeat of 1783. Take the example of the Kazan Tatars, who, before 1552, were ardent enemies to the Russians and brought Russia much grief. But then they began to actively build together with the Russians a great empire (a common “Horde”), showed many examples of devotion and heroism. They became part of the core of the Russian super-ethnos, adopted the Russian language and culture as their own.

The Crimean Tatars have kept their predatory essence. During the Eastern (Crimean) War, they began to massively side with the interventionists (Betrayal of the Crimean Tatars during the Eastern War). Only the humanity of Alexander II, who pardoned them, saved them from a well-deserved expulsion from the Crimea. During the turmoil that began in 1917, the Crimean Tatar nationalists immediately set out to restore their statehood. Moreover, their “national liberation struggle” met with ardent support from the Ukrainian separatists in the person of the Central Rada. As we see, in this issue the current ideological heirs of Bandera and the Crimean ethno-separatists maintain continuity.

The Provisional Government could not restrain the separatist offensive, rather, on the contrary, supported them with its lack of will and destructive actions. After the victory of the Bolsheviks in Petrograd, the Crimean nationalists began to actively prepare for the seizure of power on the peninsula. To fight the Soviet regime, the Crimean Tatars entered into an alliance with the Ukrainian nationalists. To suppress the separatist insurrection, it was necessary to use force. Ethnic separatist leaders were killed or fled to Turkey.

The next blow to the back of Russia, the Crimean Tatars inflicted upon the capture of the Crimea by German troops in April 1918 of the year. The separatists immediately rebelled against the Soviet regime. The uprising was accompanied by robbery and atrocities against the Bolsheviks and Christians. During the stay of the Germans in the Crimea, the Crimean Tatars served as servants. The Germans created a puppet government. However, the German government in the Crimea was short-lived.

Soon new invaders appeared on the peninsula - the British and French. The main base of the interventionists became Sevastopol. The “foreign rescuers” were enthusiastically welcomed by the new puppet “Crimean regional government” and the delegation of the Crimean Tatars. But in the spring of 1919, the Red Army beat off the peninsula. True, not for long. In the summer, the White Guards ousted the Reds from the Crimea. Denikin did not feel sympathy for the Crimean Tatars. Therefore, the Crimean Tatars could not continue the struggle for "independence". Before a serious opponent, they passed. Many prominent nationalists were arrested. Insulted separatists began to look for new owners - they offered Pilsudsky a mandate over Crimea. The Polish General Staff actively collaborated with the Crimean Tatar emigration. However, the Southern Front solved this problem: the Red Army occupied the Crimea in November 1920 of the year.

The next opportunity to stab a knife into the back of Russia-USSR at the Crimean Tatars appeared in the years of the Great Patriotic War. As soon as the front approached the Crimea, desertion and surrender among the Crimean Tatars became widespread. Crimean Tatars were waiting for the arrival of the Germans and were not going to fight with them. The German command promised to create the Crimean autonomy within the German Empire. From among the prisoners of the Crimean Tatars, they began to actively prepare agents who were bombarded on the peninsula to enhance anti-Soviet and pro-Hitler activities. The Red Army units, staffed by Crimean Tatars, proved to be incapable, and when the German troops entered the peninsula, the overwhelming majority of their personnel deserted. Desertion was almost universal. In a number of cases, the Crimean Tatars attacked the retreating Soviet troops, smashing the partisan food bases that they had created in case of war.

From the very first days of the arrival of the German invaders to the peninsula, the servitude of the Crimean Tatars to enemies began. The Soviet partisans in the Crimea were opposed not only by the Germans, but also by the Crimean Tatars. They had to fight in a doubly difficult situation. “Muslim committees” began work on creating structures for de-Sovietization (together with the physical liquidation of the communists and the Soviet activists) and the fascization of the Crimea. The process of creating volunteer formations to fight partisans began. To help the Germans collected money.

Crimean Tatars began to be actively involved in the creation of Crimean Tatar formations consisting of Wehrmacht, SS punitive and guard battalions, the local police apparatus and the field gendarmerie, the prison apparatus and camps. In addition, in the mountainous and wooded areas of the peninsula, self-defense detachments were actively created. They took an active part in the fight against partisans and punitive operations.

Crimean Tatars betrayed the USSR and suffered a well-deserved punishment. After the liberation of the Crimea from the Nazis, 18-20 in May 1944, by the decision of the State Committee of Defense, the Crimean Tatar population was evicted from the Crimean Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic. However, the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR recognized in 1967 that after the liberation of Crimea from 1944 in the year of German occupation, the facts of active cooperation with the occupiers of a certain part of the Tatars living in Crimea "were unreasonably attributed to the entire Tatar population of Crimea". Later, in 1989, the USSR Supreme Soviet deported the Crimean Tatars and declared the deportation of the Crimean Tatars “illegal and criminal”.

Crimean Tatars again raised their heads. During the years of the existence of “independent Ukraine”, they actively supported all steps aimed at de-Sovietisation and de-Russification of the state. At the same time, they established contacts with foreign Islamist centers, with Turkey. Crimean-Tatar militants are involved in the Syrian war on the side of the gangs.

Now the time has come for the next stage to solve the “Russian question” on the territory of Russian civilization. The Crimean Tatars are again ready to take the side of the neo-Nazi Bandera, act as a weapon for the masters of the West, who, in fact, are the directors and sponsors of the current "Ukrainian revolution."

So, recently the head of the Majlis (Parliament) of the Crimean Tatars Refat Chubarov spoke out against the secession of the Crimea from Ukraine. The head of the Majlis said that "the Crimean Tatars will not allow the realization of the" statements "of such politicians as Konstantinov." Let me remind you that the head of the Crimean autonomy’s parliament, Vladimir Konstantinov, did not rule out the possible separation of Crimea from Ukraine in connection with the Kiev events. According to Chubarov, "the Crimean Tatars simply will not allow it to be done." Chubarov promised to preserve the unity of Ukraine.

In fact, this is frank hypocrisy. It is profitable for the leaders of the Crimean separatists to be part of Ukraine, which is on a pro-Western and neo-Nazi course. The leaders of the Crimean Tatars agree with the policy of de-Sovietization and de-Russification of Ukraine, which they are planning to finally separate from the single Russian civilization. Russian fate awaits Russian in the Baltic States: they will be people of the second (third) grade. Some will be forced out to Russia, others will be assimilated in two or three generations with the help of total “Ukrainization”. At this stage, the goals of neo-Nazis and Crimean ethno-separatists coincide. Then, the Crimean Tatars, with the support of Turkey and the United States, will create an “autonomy”, which will be a tool in the struggle against Russia. There will be a kind of birth of the new Crimean Khanate, which will exploit the local "Russian-cultural" and participate in the war against Russia. The war will be fought on the informational, ideological fronts, as well as in the course of various “marsh riots” and speeches of ethnic separatists in Russia.

We must not forget that the Crimean separatists and Ukrainian Bandera in Russia have good allies. So, Tatar national separatists in Russia have already declared that the new Ukraine will serve as an example for them. And they will now wait for "solving the problems of the Crimean Tatar people." Tatar nationalists The brothers Rafis and Nafis Kashapov, who had previously been noted by a number of anti-Russian statements, published on the Milliet portal of the All-Tatar Public Center a congratulation to the "people of Ukraine on their victory in Euromaidan." According to the leaders of the Tatar nationalists, they "admire the courage and heroism of ordinary participants in Euromaidan." They congratulated the leaders of the Ukrainian revolution on victory: Tymoshenko, Klitschko, Yatsenyuk, Tyagnibok, Turchinov, leader of the Crimean Tatar Mejlis Mustafa Dzhemilev, deputy of the Supreme Council of Crimea Refat Chubarov.

Tatar nationalists from Russia participate in the war in Syria on the side of the gangs supported by the Arab monarchies and the states of the West. Tatar nationalists of Tatarstan and Siberian regions took part in power actions of “Euromaidan”, in the storming of state institutions. Islamists and ethno-separatists, relying on the powerful social base represented by the huge army of migrants of Russia, represent a terrible threat to the national security of Russia. Obviously, they are all the "fifth column" in Russia, which will be actively used by the West and the East (representatives of the Islamic project).

No wonder the leader of the “Right Sector”, which is now the main striking force of the militants, said that many “Russian patriots” had been trained in the ranks of his gangster army. At the same time, this organization of Ukrainian neo-Nazis, which is currently the most real force in Kiev (everything now depends on the number of bayonets and their combat capability), announced the beginning of de-Russification in Ukraine and the “transfer of the revolutionary fire” to Russia.

This is a war. It's sad to talk about it, it's hard at heart, the hardest predictions come true, but this is war. The ideological heirs of Hitler's henchmen, with the full support of the West, won the first victories in the battle for Ukraine ... Russia more than ever needs ideological mobilization. Real economic projects on new industrialization and preparation of special services and armed forces for a difficult war. As air, special operations forces are needed, ready to fight on their territory. The era of "network wars".

We are experiencing a historic moment of the unprecedented: the war is already underway, not somewhere in Syria or Libya, but in our land. In the Russian land, where our ancestors lived for thousands of years. On the ground that 70 years ago, our fathers, grandfathers and great-grandfathers freed from a terrible enemy. They paid a terrible price for it - hundreds of thousands of Soviet soldiers were killed, freeing Ukraine. In 1945-1952 I had to fight with Bandera. In that war, we won. Now the enemy is again trampling our lands, seized Kiev, plans to turn Sevastopol into a NATO base.

The enemy wants to eradicate forever the “Russianness” in the lands of Little Russia. The near future will give an answer to an important question: is Moscow ready to join the battle and win the battle incomparably more ambitious than the Olympics. In the battle for the very existence of the superethnos of the Rus and Russian civilization on Earth. If the current authorities are unable to respond to this challenge, the arrival of new Russian national leaders is inevitable. They always appear at the turn.