Caucasian rally in Moscow, the offensive of Wahhabism in Tatarstan and the need to revive the "Russian project"

Subject Caucasian rally in Moscow received a continuation. January 26 is planned to hold a rally against xenophobia and Islamophobia at Manezhnaya Square. According to the organizers, up to a million people will attend the demonstration.

“On the eleventh of January, we will submit an application and will request 26 in January. The venue will be Manege Square. A lot of organizations from Central Asia, Volga and Transcaucasia joined in, ” сообщил RSN is one of the organizers of the protest, representative of the Russian Congress of the Peoples of the Caucasus Abakar Abakarov. Which organizations will take part in the rally, Abakarov did not specify. The press release of the event sent to 20 in December included four participants: A. Abakarov from the Russian Congress of the Peoples of the Caucasus, Muhammad Magomedov (Dagestan movement Union of the Just), Izzat Aman (Union of Tajik Youth in Russia) and Nail Nabiullin (Azatlyk) .

It is already known that Tatar nationalists ready to support the action in Moscow. The Union of Tatar youth “Azatlyk” (“Freedom”) was noted for having organized a series of actions “in defense of the constitutional rights of Muslims” in Kazan. In particular, in 2012, two rallies were held in defense of Muslims; among the protesters were members of the Al-Ikhlas mosque. This community was eliminated by a court decision because of accusations of extremism. The community was associated with the Hizb ut-Tahrir international Islamist organization. True, only a few dozen people participated in the events. But the first step is the hardest. The main thing is to start, it will be easier to continue ...

Obviously, the liberals and left-wing radicals will support the beginning. In 2012, the coordinator of the “Left Front” and one of the organizers of the “swamp movement” in Moscow Sergey Udaltsov and the leader of the Tatar nationalist movement “Azatlyk” Nail Nabiullin exchanged statements in support of each other. Udaltsov saw “sound grain” in Tatar national separatism, and Nabiullin, in turn, declared support for “bogs”, since the “belolentochnikov” movement was directed “for the benefit of the Tatar people”.

Now Tatar national separatists are ready to expand the geography of actions and take part in a mass protest in Moscow. Kazan nationalists published a call for the mobilization of supporters from other regions in which large Tatar communities live. Thus, activists from Bashkiria, Chuvashia and the Ulyanovsk region have already participated in actions in Kazan. Nabiullin said that the rally in Moscow would provide an opportunity to involve representatives of the Tatar community in the capital in protest activities. In addition, in his opinion, “Freedom” already has a certain authority among representatives of other Turkic Muslim peoples - Azerbaijanis, Kazakhs. Earlier, Svoboda organized street actions on the day of the Kazakh Famine, on the day of the Armenian Genocide of Azerbaijanis, etc. In the summer, Nabiullin made a working trip to Baku and recently returned from a trip to Turkey. Therefore, according to him, “Azatlyk” can count on holding an “All-Russian rally against Islamophobia” to support representatives of other Muslim and Turkic peoples.

The leader of the movement "Russian" Dmitry Demushkin считаетthat, at best, a few dozen people will attend the rally or it will not take place at all. So, the Federation of Migrants of Russia has already promised to organize its protest action on the day of the “Russian March” 4 in November, but it did not fulfill its promise. Even if representatives of the Caucasian and Muslim movements can organize a rally in the center of Moscow, this will only reinforce the negative attitude of the residents of the capital towards migrants and the strengthening of Islam in Russia. In addition, according to Demushkin, the idea of ​​holding a rally against Islamophobia looks like blackmailing the authorities and society. Its organizers want to show their strength. Therefore, the rally will cause the opposite result, only exacerbating the split in the line of religion and interethnic relations.

Dagestani also expressed their opinion on the rally in Moscow experts. Political commentator of the Dagestan newspaper Chernovik, Magomed Magomedov, believes that the usefulness of the rally "depends on the wording and accents" by which the proposals of the protesters will be expressed. According to the political scientist, any protest action is a signal from the state to the state, indicating that there are unresolved problems in some sphere of life activity. According to Magomedov, protest sentiments that exist among Caucasian youth have not only religious, but also secular roots. In addition, the rise of anti-Islamic sentiment in Russia, caused by the activation of radical Islamists, will hit all Muslims, including those loyal to power.

In general, you can agree with him. The emergence in Russia of the germs of “political Islam” and the sharp increase in the Islamist underground, which often operates quite legally, speaks of a serious problem. For more than two decades, the authorities have not been conducting serious work in the youth environment; Russia does not have a single state-forming ideology. Therefore, representatives of the Western and Islamic project in Russia are a great success. A holy place is never empty. Everything is simple: either the state conducts long-term work to educate the patriots of their Fatherland and is itself trying to get closer to the model of the “ideal state and society”, or the western and eastern (Islamic) values ​​will destroy Russian civilization. Here it should be noted that with such a terrible social division and the domination of large comprador capital, as in Russia, the propaganda of positive patriotic values ​​will not succeed, since the words will not coincide with deeds. Only when the political “elite” of Russia itself will try to come closer to the ideals of self-restraint, humanity and justice, becoming a real elite, the best part of society, will the unity of government and society be possible (for example, Stalin’s USSR).

Another Dagestan political analyst, Khanzhan Kurbanov, the former editor-in-chief of the weekly Present Time (Makhachkala), believes that holding a Moscow rally is inappropriate. According to him, in Russia there is no Islamophobia or Caucasophobia at the state level, so there is no need to organize such a protest in Moscow. In addition, such a rally will not benefit. “It is inappropriate to once again focus attention on the Caucasus,” the expert believes. According to Kurbanov, such a protest, on the contrary, can be perceived by a part of society as a threat and provoke a response from the nationalists. Muslims need to learn to defend their rights “in the civil legal field”.

Leaving aside questions about whether a rally will take place or not, he will gather a significant number of people, or not, ask ourselves another, more serious question: why? The answer, especially in the context of not one “color revolution”, which we saw in a number of countries of the former socialist bloc and the “Arab spring”, is quite obvious. Russia is being pushed towards the Yugoslav (Syrian) scenario. The enemies of the Russian civilization need a confrontation along the line of Christians - Muslims, their own - alien, ethnic minorities against the state-forming nation, the outskirts against the center. Therefore, the task of the organizers of the Caucasian rally is clearly different from the stated. If they are not used “in the dark”, then they deliberately provoke Russian society into a split and opposition. Demonstrating strength and showing a new political situation, they defy an established situation.

This action acquires a special symbolism taking into account the participation of members of the Azatlyk (Freedom) movement. The essentially national-separatist movement is actively trying to master the field of Islamic unity. About the danger of this trend says the situation in Tatarstan. The free action in Russia of the carriers of the “Islamic project” resulted in the creation of a powerful Salafi and Wahhabi underground: terrorist attacks and murders of spiritual leaders across the country, arson of churches in Tataria and the Hizb-ut-Tahrir automobile rallies. The trend is very dangerous. Its development guarantees rivers of blood.

December 23 in Moscow passed round table meeting The Human Rights Center of the World Russian People’s Council on the topic “Where does the threat to Orthodoxy in Tatarstan come from?” Important questions were raised on it. Archpriest Vsevolod Chaplin, chairman of the Synodal Department for Church and Society Interaction of the Moscow Patriarchate, noted the frightening news from the Volga region (massive arson of churches, the killing of representatives of traditional Islam and the participation of representatives of local officials in the dismantling of worship crosses). He also noted cases when representatives of radical organizations appealed to Orthodox priests demanding to convert to Islam.

The Kryashen priest (Kryashens are baptized Tatars, an ethno-confessional group of Tatars from the Volga and Ural regions) from the village of Kryash-Serd, Pestrechinsky district of Tatarstan, Fr. Dimitri (Sizov) reported on the Islamization of Kryashens, the appearance of Wahhabis among them, the imposition of Islamic values. There was a threat of loss of the whole Orthodox people.

Director of the Human Rights Center of the World Russian People’s Council, Roman Silantyev, noted the merging of Wahhabism and power. In his opinion, in terms of inter-religious stability, the Republic of Tatarstan is currently in Russia in last place, and the situation in it can only be compared with Dagestan. Moreover, the republican authorities themselves helped to spread and strengthen Wahhabism, when in 1998 they forcibly united all Muslims in the RT into a single Spiritual Administration, and put the mufti on Gusman Iskhakov, who, as it turned out, turned out to be Wahhabi. The expert said that he has been in the republic annually since 1999, and so many complaints about the local authorities and “their inadequate policies regarding Orthodoxy and traditional Islam have not been received anywhere.” Silantyev noted the opinion that no one can destroy the interfaith peace in the republic is naive and fundamentally wrong. He cited the example of Syria, where Muslims and Christians lived side by side in peace and harmony for 1500 for years, and the radicals only had one year to blow up the country and fill it with blood.

The journalists of the newspaper Komsomolskaya Pravda, Dmitry Steshin and Alexander Kots, who studied the situation in the republic and published the report “Tatarstan: baptism of fire” about the burning of churches and Wahhabism in the republic, also noted the danger of an offensive of radicalism in Tatarstan. They compared Tatarstan with Dagestan, where they also filmed a report in 2007, and where they were then told that Wahhabis are nonsense, they do not pose a threat to society. However, now Dagestan officials have already paid zakat (tax) to Wahhabis and, according to their requirements, close the restaurants if they consider them haram. Similar processes are now taking place in Tatarstan - with the persistent reluctance of local authorities to recognize the problem of radical Islam in the republic ...

The complex knot of problems in the North Caucasus, the topic of mass migration, the intensification of radical Islam in Russia, the emergence of the sprouts of “political Islam” and the development of national separatism — all this speaks of a serious illness in Russia. We are gradually approaching the new year 1917 or 1991. It is impossible to close our eyes to these problems, to speak only about “domestic conflicts”, to translate everything into the sphere of social and economic problems. The revival of “Great Russia” (within the borders of the Russian Federation, Ukraine, Belarus and Transnistria), the expansion of the “Russian project”, the Russian language and culture, the fight against archaism in all its manifestations (such as shooting at weddings, bride kidnapping, polygamy, or "Magicians and psychics), the inclusion in the sphere of influence of Great Russia, the Baltic States and Central Asia. It is necessary to again offer the world a project of creating a society of the future, a society of creation. We need to move to a new technological structure. There are already dozens of technologies that can completely change the face of humanity. If Russia becomes the leader of humanity, who supports and preserves the values ​​of good, justice, shows the path of the formation of human society (all the great prophets - Siddhartha Gautama, Jesus Christ, Mohammed, Sergius of Radonezh) strove for it, the remaining problems will be resolved in a natural way.

Currently, the planet is covered by a wave of destruction (degradation), involution. Mankind has stopped in its development and is rapidly deteriorating. Western values ​​and radical Islam turn people into intelligent animals, "two-legged tools." Stop and reverse this process can only Russian civilization - it is its code and program. The task (mission) of Russia-Russia on the planet is the preservation of spirituality (divine principle) in man, the fight against evil in all its manifestations. This deep symbolism is displayed even in the coat of arms of Russia. On it the rider strikes a snake. Good conquers evil. This is the main myth of the Indo-European language family: the thunder-bearer, the horseman (Perun, George the Victorious) strikes a serpent, a world evil. Russia must fulfill its mission, or it is waiting for death. There is no other way!