Russia will not tolerate further Israeli attacks on Damascus

9 May 2013 458

Tehran (FNA) - Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, while in Shanghai, received a sharp reprimand from Russian President Vladimir Putin with a warning that Russia will not tolerate further Israeli attacks on Damascus and will react.

Putin did not say how, but he announced that he had ordered the acceleration of deliveries of advanced Russian weapons to Syria.

Israeli military sources Debkafile revealed that the Russian leader was referring to the C-300 system and the Iskander (SS-9 Stone according to NATO classification) capable of carrying the 720K26 nuclear warheads, which are sufficiently accurate to hit a target within a meter radius at a distance of 5 kilometers .

In his telephone call to Netanyahu, the Russian leader advised the prime minister to be sure of this and keep this in mind.

Since the Syrian air defense teams have already been trained in Russia to handle the C-300 systems, they can be commissioned as soon as they land as a result of one of the daily Russian air traffic to Syria. Russian representatives will monitor their deployment and prepare them for work.

Moscow is responding not only to the Israeli air operations against Syria, but also in anticipation of the impending decision of the Obama administration to send the first arms shipments to the Syrian rebels.

Intelligence agencies in Moscow and the Middle East accept as obvious that by the time Washington makes public this decision, some Syrian rebel factions will already be armed with American weapons.

The fact that the measure was put into operation was shown by the introduction on Monday of the chairman of the US Senate Committee on Foreign Relations Bob Menendey legislation allowing the US to provide weapons and military training to Syrian rebels.

US military instructors have worked with Syrian rebels in training camps in Jordan and Turkey for several months. Thus, the provision of weapons to them depended only on the decision in Washington, an Israeli website asserts.

Putin’s message to Netanyahu was intended to reach a wider audience than Jerusalem — also Barack Obama in Washington and Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing on the eve of talks with Netanyahu there on Tuesday.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

boortsog

+2

9 May 2013 21: 06

Good morning everyone.
Happy Victory Day, friends! from mongolia bratzi slava russian people always respect from mongolia
boortsog

0

9 May 2013 21: 10

Good morning everyone.
Happy Victory Day, friends! from mongolia respect russian people ...slava russian people ....
ABV

0

9 May 2013 21: 12

That's right, it's high time!
And most importantly, Israel and the United States are asking Russia not to supply S-300s to Syria and Iran... you see, bombing Syria is not convenient for them... they are completely crazy, they cannot see the edges behind their arrogance...
Toit

-1

9 May 2013 21: 32

Quote: MaKeNa
Ha, Ha, Ha! You might think that you created your Israel through purely peaceful means. And the Arabs themselves gave Jerusalem to you out of love, the Syrians offered you the Golan so that you wouldn’t die of thirst in Israel, and you came to Sinai only to help develop the resort business in Egypt. Well, angels, damn it, agons! Peacemakers b..., who to look for.....!

God forbid, everything was captured in a fair battle against superior enemy forces, if they had fought better, we wouldn’t be here.

Quote: Pol
Let's get back to the history of the issue! Were there any contracts for the supply of S-300s to Syria? Were they subject to any sanctions?

As far as I know, no, only Washington constantly states that the United States is against it.
Quote: Pol
What hope does Israel have with the overthrow of at least some secular regimes?

It has already been written many times on this forum that Israel is not interested in overthrowing the hostile but predictable Assad, and replacing him with scumbags; Israel has only two benefits in this matter:
1) It is easier to fight with any gangs than with the regular Syrian army (not at all weak before the civil war).
2) Knock out Iran's main ally, and thereby undermine the Shiite forces in the region.
All of the above IMHO.
1. Pol
  
  0
  
  9 May 2013 21: 45
  
  those. the target is Iran?
shalk

+2

9 May 2013 21: 34

Those who have entered into a debate with Mr., who sticks out his tongue at every possible reason and without, and explains to everyone what useless air defense systems Russia has, it is better to familiarize yourself with more authoritative opinions and not waste your emotions on empty talkers.

http://news.mail.ru/politics/13033836/
http://russian.rt.com/article/8511
Toit

-1

9 May 2013 21: 38

Quote: shalk
Those who have entered into a debate with Mr., who sticks out his tongue at every possible reason and without, and explains to everyone what useless air defense systems Russia has, it is better to familiarize yourself with more authoritative opinions and not waste your emotions on empty talkers.

This is about whom?
1. Kuzkin Batyan
  
  0
  
  9 May 2013 22: 16
  
  I'm thinking about the professor.
mushtuc

0

9 May 2013 21: 46

Finally they got it: Putin expressed his ultimatum.
Toit

0

9 May 2013 21: 48

Quote: Pol
those. the target is Iran?

I am not present at the meetings of the General Staff, but in my opinion this is the only benefit that Israel can derive from this war.
1. Pol
  
  +1
  
  9 May 2013 21: 51
  
  What exactly could be the benefit? In your opinion...
  1. sashka
    
    0
    
    12 May 2013 13: 59
    
    [quote=Pol]What exactly could be the benefit? In your opinion..
    
    no one knows this..And the omnipresent one too.
ale-x

+2

9 May 2013 21: 52

Friends, Happy Great Holiday, Victory Day!
A lot of words have been said, but let's look at how events will develop.
No statements from official bodies!? Why did you turn rumors into a fait accompli?
Has anyone transcribed the conversation between GDP and Beni?
Toit

0

9 May 2013 22: 03

Quote: Pol
What exactly could be the benefit? In your opinion...

The direct connection between Iran and Hezbollah is interrupted, and accordingly the lack of money and weapons can thus undermine Hezbollah’s forces and take it out of the big game.
Secondly, Syria is Iran’s main ally; therefore, if Assad falls in the Middle East, Iran will have no allies left.
Hamas in the Gaza Strip is also receiving a strong blow as it is supported by Syria and Iran

Turkey has no less advantages, as well as Sunni monarchies with it in the same bundle, hatred between Shiites and Sunnis is much deeper than between Islam and Judaism, in my opinion, it is there that we must look for the roots of the Syrian problem.
1. Pol
  
  0
  
  9 May 2013 22: 06
  
  Stop! Stop! Stop!
  Are you talking about the rebels? Hezbollah is not a rebel?
Toit

0

9 May 2013 22: 14

Quote: Pol
Are you talking about the rebels? Hezbollah is not a rebel?

I’m talking about Hezbollah in Lebanon, not in Syria, and of course they are not rebels, in Syria they fight on the side of the ruling regime (no matter how legitimate), in Lebanon they are more likely a local gang, on the one hand Hezbollah is fighting against Israel, on the other hand Again, Shiites and Sunnis oppose themselves to the Lebanese army, although Lebanon is generally a hodgepodge of several denominations of Christians, Druze, Shiites and Sunnis.
1. Pol
  
  0
  
  9 May 2013 22: 36
  
  Sunni-Shiite....Is there a difference for you personally?
stranik72

0

9 May 2013 22: 31

In all this controversy, the UN somehow got lost, but in theory, what Israel did was an act of aggression, and an obvious one, so once again I am convinced that this is an absolutely unnecessary association that is absolutely not intended to ensure justice in the world. All the blood that has been shed in the world over the past 20 years has been generally approved by this organization. As for the S-300, only deliver it subject to appropriate training of Syrian specialists with control launches and organization of use at our training grounds. And I heard that the Tunguska and Pantsir were practically taken out of combat condition by illiterate operation.
drongo

0

9 May 2013 22: 47

It's high time to move from words...to deeds.
Toit

0

9 May 2013 22: 53

Quote: Pol
Sunni-Shiite....Is there a difference for you personally?

I don’t really care, what kind of person is important, my father-in-law is a Muslim, and my father is a Christian, so what?
But the interfaith struggle in the Muslim world remained approximately at the level of hatred of medieval Europe, if we compare Catholics and Orthodox Christians
1. Pol
  
  0
  
  9 May 2013 23: 00
  
  Only now someone is spurring this “struggle”..... Who is pointing a finger?
bazillius

0

9 May 2013 22: 54

Truly a gift for Victory Day. And let Israel not forget to whom this state owes its very existence.
Toit

0

9 May 2013 22: 58

Quote: bazillius
Truly a gift for Victory Day. And let Israel not forget to whom this state owes its very existence.

We remember and appreciate that my grandfather went through the whole war, my grandmother was drafted for 43 years, her three brothers died at the front, don’t paint everyone with the same brush.
Toit

0

9 May 2013 23: 04

Quote: Pol
Only now someone is spurring this “struggle”..... Who is pointing a finger?

All and sundry, including Russia, and in Israel there is generally an opinion that all wars in the Middle East are wars between the United States and Russia, only through the hands of others.
1. Pol
  
  0
  
  9 May 2013 23: 14
  
  Does it happen? And from history... how many wars did Russia start?!
  Recently, Russia has become very loyal to the United States, unfortunately, but something is changing...
  Feels like "Wind of Change"....
  Yes! We will not surrender Syria!!!!
  Why? - Look at the map!!!!!
Toit

0

9 May 2013 23: 26

Quote: Pol
Does it happen? And from history... how many wars did Russia start?!

I was in Poland, asked the same thing from the Poles, they laughed in my face and remembered 20 and 41 years, Afghanistan, Finland, the annexation of the Baltic states and Bessarabia, Georgia, I don’t blame Russia, there were reasons for all this, and this is not about Syria only a card, the prestige of Russia in the Muslim world is at stake, I personally am sorry that the USSR and Israel fell out at 56, since Russia does not abandon friends, and the USA appeared only after Israel’s great victory, and I am afraid that if something happens it will be just as bad he'll fall down, well, a holy place is never empty)
1. Pol
  
  0
  
  9 May 2013 23: 28
  
  Poles? Afghan? Finns? - clarify... I’m not even asking about Georgia...
Toit

0

9 May 2013 23: 34

Tukhachevsky's invasion of Poland in 20, the Poles believe that the USSR also invaded in 42, helping Hitler (the opinion is not mine, but the Poles), the winter war against Finland in 39, the entry of troops into Afghanistan in 79
Georgia did not directly invade the territory of the Russian Federation (by the way, you should have seen how in Israel, people from Russia rejoiced at the victory then)
1. Pol
  
  0
  
  9 May 2013 23: 39
  
  About Georgia - don’t even get me started, the peacekeepers died...
  1948 - War of Independence
  1948–1970s - mass exodus of Jews from Arab countries as a result of pogroms and oppression, influx of population to Israel
  1949-1955 - support for the “guerrilla war” against Israel from the territories occupied by Egypt and Jordan, and Syria [4][5][6].
  1956 - Suez crisis
  1967 - Six Day War
  1967-1970 - War of attrition
  1973 - Yom Kippur War
  1979 - Camp David Accords and Egyptian-Israeli Peace Treaty
  1982 - Lebanon War
  1994 - Israeli-Jordanian peace treaty
  2000 - withdrawal of troops from South Lebanon
  2006 - Second Lebanon War
  .....
  .....
  ...
  ...
  1. Toit
    
    -1
    
    9 May 2013 23: 43
    
    If this is a list of Arab-Israeli wars, then write down who attacked which of them, by the way, the list can be replenished, but what’s the point?
    About the dead peacekeepers, but then in fairness the Arabs started the six-day war
    1. Pol
      
      0
      
      9 May 2013 23: 56
      
      And the list of deeds of your “masters” is not even partly included in the forum...
      http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%BA_%D0%B2%D0%BE%D
      0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8B%D1%85_%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D
      0%A1%D0%A8%D0%90
Lexagun

+2

9 May 2013 23: 59

The news is interesting not about the S-300, but about the Iskanders.

With the S-300, everything is quite clear, the contract was signed back in 2010, Russia has never refused it. Repeated statements by our officials about the mandatory execution of previously concluded contracts and weapons of a defensive nature are widely known. Naturally, air defense systems relate directly to this. In any case, the first kits destined for Syria were painted accordingly back in the summer of last year (absolutely exactly, as if I had painted them myself) ), then they began training Syrian crews. All this took time and a 3-year contract period is normal. So the situation with the supply of S-300 is normal and planned. And attracting attention to it is rather a matter of “attention” to the Syrian topic.

But the delivery of Iskanders is more like an open warning about readiness for forceful solutions in the Syrian issue, if only because, as far as I know, Syrian crews for Iskanders were not trained. And Iskander is “Israel through and through” - to the Egyptian border. And Iskanders are not air defense. The very mention of the supply of Earth-to-Surface Missiles, and even such decent ones, of course, does not mean that they have already been delivered, but it is very symbolic. This also means that in the event of a direct invasion, our crews, advisers, and probably the fleet will not remain on the sidelines, in which case one cannot help but remember the words addressed to the leaders of Qatar that one warhead will be enough for the entire Qatar.
1. Toit
  
  0
  
  10 May 2013 00: 05
  
  We'll see, in big politics even the impossible is possible
Toit

0

10 May 2013 00: 02

Quote: Pol
And the list of actions of your “masters” is not even partly included in the forum field

did I say that the USA is the most peace-loving country in the world? As for the hosts, until 56 it was the USSR, until 67 it was supported by France, and only after that the USA, no one stopped Russia from establishing relations until that time, otherwise you look and with 300 they would have supplied not to Damascus, but to Jerusalem, and even recently could have made better use of Israel's one and a half million Russian-speaking population.
1. Pol
  
  0
  
  10 May 2013 00: 15
  
  Why do Israeli civilians need S-300s?
  Come back... We'll definitely use it...
Toit

0

10 May 2013 00: 18

Quote: Pol
Why do Israeli civilians need the S-300? Come back... We'll definitely use it...

1) we’ll agree there
2) I’ve been reading this forum for a couple of years, after everything I’ve heard, no, thank you, it’s better if you come and visit us
3) Good night.
1. Pol
  
  0
  
  10 May 2013 00: 21
  
  I'll definitely come
Simple

0

10 May 2013 00: 20

Quote: Toit
The direct connection between Iran and Hezbollah is interrupted, and accordingly the lack of money and weapons can thus undermine Hezbollah’s forces and take it out of the big game.
Secondly, Syria is Iran’s main ally; therefore, if Assad falls in the Middle East, Iran will have no allies left.
Hamas in the Gaza Strip is also receiving a strong blow as it is supported by Syria and Iran

Wouldn’t it be too fatty for the well-being of Israel to “drain” such
countries like Syria and Iran?
And will this be enough for Israel, because appetite comes with eating?
Toit

0

10 May 2013 00: 29

Quote: Simple
Wouldn't it be too greasy?

We'll drink it with vodka, they say it breaks down fats.
Besides, this was just my personal guess and not based on official documents.
Alexander_

0

10 May 2013 01: 03

There are so many articles on the Internet about the most powerful Syrian air defense. But in reality it turned out that there was no air defense at all.
Happy Holidays!
1. Pol
  
  0
  
  10 May 2013 01: 22
  
  There is air defense! But they won’t shine on “trifles”.... They farmed out a few more “targets” so as not to “provoke” the wandering people and Co....
  Waiting for ...
  1. Pol
    
    0
    
    10 May 2013 01: 34
    
    Assad was told “don’t answer” - we will use the situation to provide help and answer next time. And the next time is unlikely.... They'll shit themselves
    1. Alexander_
      
      0
      
      10 May 2013 12: 48
      
      Maybe, maybe not. How did the Georgians begin to shoot peacekeepers, ours also didn’t hear a word, but where was the sane military leadership? Why weren’t their firing positions immediately suppressed? There are no peacekeepers in Syria; it is, of course, their problem to take the necessary measures in a timely manner.
Scandinavian

0

10 May 2013 10: 22

Respect to Vladimir Vladimirovich, only one thing worries me, why are we reacting so late? When even Iran was the first to stand up for Syria, Moscow reacts much later. What could this mean? The fact that such decisions are not made from one authority “they say we need to consult with the eminence grise.” Otherwise, the Syrians would have delivered several complexes by air a long time ago. Then the Israeli eagles would quickly become chicks.
gregor6549

+2

10 May 2013 12: 50

"Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, while in Shanghai, received a sharp reprimand from Russian President Vladimir Putin"
I imagined the mischievous schoolboy Netanyahu standing with a guilty look in front of the strict teacher Putin, who threatens to put him, Netanyahu, in a corner. It’s nonsense, although you wouldn’t expect anything else from the Iranian leadership
Yes, Russia and its leader Putin have every reason to express their dissatisfaction with certain Israeli actions. But Russia is not Iran and has always done this within the framework allowed by the diplomatic protocol. And Russia can prevent Israel from doing something wrong mainly indirectly, i.e. arming Syria or raising the issue of sanctions against Israel at the UN. Russia will not get involved in hostilities against Israel on the side of Syria for many reasons. On the other hand, the presence of more modern weapons systems in Syria will not essentially change anything, and the whole history is proof of this.
Maybe we need to negotiate something else. For example, so that Syria does not supply medium-range missiles to Hezbollah. And if she nevertheless decides to supply them, and Hezbollah to use them, then Syria, Hezbollah and Lebanon should be prepared not for targeted strikes on military targets (as Israel tried to do in the last Lebanese War, while Hezbollah launched its missiles from residential areas) and to a full-scale war between Israel, Lebanon and Syria. In war, as in war. After all, during the Second World War, none of the warring parties particularly interacted with the enemy. Then, of course, crocodile tears were shed for those innocently killed, and with these tears it all ended. Otherwise, it’s not a war, but a laughingstock and an invitation to the next war and exactly the same scenario. And it should be like it was engraved on Oleko Dundich’s saber: “Don’t take it out without need, don’t put it in without glory”
sashka

0

10 May 2013 13: 58

At first I wanted to argue. Then it became uninteresting.
Ruslan_F38

0

10 May 2013 15: 27

Quote: professor
You are like small children. Well, armor and beeches are already there, so what? Helped?

Well, of course, Israel didn’t help against your steep misunderstanding, and maybe no one used them, so that you would get into more trouble, eh, smart guy?
Toit

0

10 May 2013 15: 58

Quote: Ruslan_F38
Well, of course, Israel didn’t help against your steep misunderstanding, and maybe no one used them, so that you would get into more trouble, eh, smart guy?

Or maybe they liked it and want more? )))
Yugra

0

10 May 2013 17: 08

But these “defenders of democracy” will go crazy, and where will that Jerusalem end up when the first Iskander installations appear on the outskirts of Damascus?
Toit

0

10 May 2013 17: 19

Quote: Ugra
But these “defenders of democracy” will go crazy, and where will that Jerusalem end up when the first Iskander installations appear on the outskirts of Damascus?

Do you think his geographic coordinates change?
that with this wunderwaffe Assad is invincible?
svp67

0

10 May 2013 17: 23

Quote: aszzz888
Tehran (FNA) - Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, while in Shanghai, received a sharp reprimand from Russian President Vladimir Putin with a warning that Russia will not tolerate further Israeli attacks on Damascus and will react.
But I wonder who “recorded” this telephone conversation: the Chinese MGB or the Iranian MIT? But in other respects they cooperate very fruitfully....
serge

-1

10 May 2013 18: 18

Good news on Victory Day. Currently there is only one completely Nazi state in the world - Israel. As always, the only country that brings the fascists to their senses is Russia.
Toit

0

10 May 2013 19: 21

He won’t tolerate it, but he won’t sell it either....
I think so

0

10 May 2013 21: 45

Russia reacts somehow “sluggishly” to the events in Syria... Considering that Syria is a step on the West’s path to Russia, then the behavior of the Russian leadership is not very clear...
The chain of events threatening Russia in this regard is obvious:
Syria, Iran,
After taking possession of ALL the world's oil resources, the West will be able to do whatever it wants with Russia...
Well, for example, set the price of crude oil at 25 bucks per barrel and... Russia will simply go hungry, rebel and self-destruct through a civil war... The only thing that is REALLY dangerous for the zvapad in this scenario is the transfer of power in Russia to REAL patriots, but having HUGE information resources in Russia, the West CAN direct a crowd of hungry people in the right direction of self-destruction of the country...
morprepud

0

11 May 2013 00: 14

Guys!!! Our GDP has finally BROKEN!!! Good girl!!! Happy VICTORY DAY everyone!!!!!!
Alexander_

0

11 May 2013 00: 50

They announced today that Russia does not plan to sell the S-300 to Syria. Obviously, he doesn’t plan to give it as a gift, and doesn’t plan to rent it out. Only carries out deliveries under old contracts.
1. sashka
  
  0
  
  12 May 2013 14: 06
  
  Quote: Alexander_
  Today they announced on the box -
  
  Don't read newspapers, especially in the morning.
  1. Alexander_
    
    0
    
    12 May 2013 14: 33
    
    Yes, they showed Lavrov, he confused everyone. It must be that they don’t supply Christmas decorations that can be easily bypassed, otherwise why spend money?
papik09

0

11 May 2013 03: 53

Quote: kush62
Amer is not even standing nearby. There are many of you, but we are the Rat ...

And so I want to add: And on the amers .... us army !!!
Happy Victory Day Russians!

100% ++++++++++++++++++
Gentile

0

13 May 2013 21: 17

The first time I came to this site was through the link “Russia will not tolerate...”
The article, of course, was written in the style of the yellow press, but the content of the comments caught my attention.
Unfortunately, I note the restraint and logic of opponents from Israel (Professor, Pimply) against the backdrop of the aggressive and even simply reckless statements of some defenders of the Motherland.
Yes, Israel is behaving aggressively, but it is fighting for its security, and not for money or, on orders from the United States, for the redistribution of everything.
For them, Assad, like for us Mishiko, is also intuitively looking for a mustache on this overgrown Hitler Youth.
They have been fighting with him for a long time and successfully. I have no doubt at all that if the situation escalates, Israel is capable of throwing Assad into the toilet, as they say, but does not do this for the obvious reason - starting a large-scale war with Syria is too difficult for them. Therefore, they are waiting without options until Assad himself inevitably falls.
The Turks are also not fools; they won’t go to war on a large scale to rake in the heat with their hands.
But the civil war is going on. Assad, right or wrong, has blood on his hands.
Half of the country curses him, and the other half will curse him when it all ends with his army being sent home.
It is possible to preserve this conflict with the help of the S-300 for some time, but this will only lead to even greater casualties and destruction in cities. Is such a goal worthy?
And how will Israel respond to the deployment of the S-300? This would be a serious blow to their safety.
I have no doubt that Israel is capable of dealing with them.
If only for the reason that time to prepare and the factor of surprise will be on their side.
It is then that Russia will truly lose face and no patriots will be able to do anything except their heroic death for the ideals of justice. And each side will have its own truth and justice.
But most importantly, the entire air defense technology in Russia will be called into question and trust in it will fall below the plinth, and this is the security of our Motherland.
I think that the GDP understands perfectly well the situation in which it has to make a very serious decision.
Behind him is the safety of 140 million people, and not the ideals of forum patriots.
He bucked, of course, but only to make it clear that he couldn’t be driven into a corner, otherwise inappropriate actions were possible.
They understood, the very best came running one by one, most likely not without the assistance of Israel.
Perhaps they agreed to wash their face, they called it a conference.
About the Iskanders it’s complete nonsense. Only a mentally ill person can talk with satisfaction about striking Israel's nuclear facilities. For provoking a bloody massacre with Israel, the bill will quite rightly be presented, but in other categories and this will be sad.

I apologize in advance to forum patriots, everything written is just my personal unprofessional opinion.
I’m just one of those who with great pleasure breaks the bloody snot of an offender even for obscene words, but I will never do this in public in an imposed situation, especially when he has any support.
In a situation convenient for me, I receive what I deserve calmly, within reason, without preparatory hysterics and warnings. For everyone else, of course, he started again himself.
Israel’s behavior towards Syria is very figurative, but I see the same motives.

I congratulate everyone on the Victory Day and, no less, our opponents from Israel.
radio operator

0

14 May 2013 08: 00

Finally, the Russian leader showed firmness. This makes me happy.
True, Libya, Algeria and Egypt have already been merged.
vvp901

0

14 May 2013 18: 25

It is very pleasant that the Russian president spoke such words to the Israeli leadership. It becomes clear that these are no longer Yeltsin’s times and the path to overthrowing the unipolar (American world) has been opened by Putin. The world has entered into a decisive battle, on the territory of Syria, the future of all humanity is being decided. I would like to wish courage and perseverance to our president, as well as to our loyal allies (China and the Commonwealth countries).
And Us Rat

0

31 October 2013 02: 54

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
And Us Rat

0

3 November 2013 05: 12

31th of October 2013
Lebanese media reported on the morning of October 31 that last night six IDF aircraft flying through Lebanese territory attacked an air defense base near the Syrian port city of Latakia. The Syrian opposition claims that the strike came from the Mediterranean Sea. According to some sources, S-125 missiles, which were intended for transfer to the terrorist group Hezbollah, were destroyed. Israel has previously stated that it will not allow the transfer of missile technology and weapons to terrorists. Other sources state that the S-300 complexes, which were put on duty a few days earlier, were destroyed, which Israel also expressed categorical disagreement with.

Well, it seems that it became clearer in deeds and not in words who and what will really not be tolerated.
P.S. - Nobody really knows what was bombed, so please don’t get hung up on words - what I found and posted, the only thing that is certain is that an airstrike took place. And there is no need to minus me either, I didn’t give the order and I wasn’t sitting at the helm.