Traitors from around the world. Foreigners in the German Wehrmacht and SS troops

347
"Who is between the living, that there is still hope, since the living dog is better than a dead lion."
Ecclesiastes 9: 4


Collaborationism during the Second World War. They say that the commissioner is a state of mind. And yes, one can probably agree with this statement. But if so, then another statement will probably be correct, that the fascist is also a state of mind, only with a minus sign. That is, someone follows the idea, but there are also those who choose the “dark side of power” for completely different reasons. This is cowardice, and mercantilism, and immoralism. In any case, all these spiritual qualities are not the most pleasant in the list of properties of a human person. However, they are. To one degree or another, they have ... everyone. But someone may be higher than the baser in his soul, and someone goes on about these qualities. And someone has a low threshold for pain sensitivity, so if he pushes pointed matches under his nails, he will agree to everything. Although there are those like Tommaso Campanella, whom 48 hours was tortured to torture with "velo" ("wakefulness"), that is, they did not let him sleep, periodically putting him on a stake. It is clear that sitting on a Coke does not sleep, and indeed there is not much pleasant in it. The torture was stopped only when the doctor said that another half an hour and he would die. But the most important thing is that Campanella never admitted anything and proved, as he himself wrote about it, "that his spirit is free." But again, this is an exception.



Traitors from around the world. Foreigners in the German Wehrmacht and SS troops

Soldiers of the French SS volunteer regiment (Franzosisches SS-Freiwilligen-Grenadier-Regiment) at a Paris train station say goodbye to their relatives before leaving for the Eastern Front


What is collaboration? TSB is responsible


So when it comes to foreign citizens who fought in the Nazi army during the Second World War, we must remember that there were many reasons why they did this. But for us now it’s important not to delve into all these reasons, but simply to see who, except for persons of German nationality, fought at that time on the side of the German army with weapons in hand. Not so long ago, an interesting article by A. Samsonov on Polish and Jewish collaborators was published on the pages of VO. Today we continue and develop this topic.


American Mildred Gillars. During the war, she broadcast on the Reichsradio. She performed on the radio until May 1945. Arrested on 15 on March 1946 of the year by US intelligence agencies. Received 10 years in prison for treason


To begin with, the topic of the participation of Soviet and foreign citizens in the Second World War as part of the German army and SS troops in the West is devoted to an extensive historiography, they did not make any fake secrets from it, as, say, we had before 1991. According to academician A.O. Chubaryan, “this problem in Soviet historiography was completely ignored,” because “it was based on the idea that the number of traitors to the Motherland was extremely small” (AO Chubaryan stories war // World War II. Actual problems: To the 50 anniversary of the Victory / Ed. O.A. Rzheshevsky. M., 1995. C.11). Therefore, the essence of such a phenomenon as the various types of cooperation of a certain part of Soviet citizens with Germany in domestic historical literature has not received a proper deep scientific interpretation. It is interesting that these very concepts (“collaborationism” and “collaborationists”) are not found at all in the reference literature of the pre-war period. There is no decoding and explanation of what it is, even in such authoritative publications as the Brockhaus and Efron Encyclopedic Dictionary and the Pomegranate Brothers Encyclopedic Dictionary. This, however, did not mean that in the lexicon of European languages ​​there was no such word and concept at all. It was, of course, but ... it was used extremely rarely.


And here is another “ideological collaborator”: William Joyce, a radio commentator on German radio in English, “Lord How-How” (“Lord Woof-Woof”), as his name was English. Irish by birth, had a diploma from the University of London, founder of the National Socialist League in England. Since August 1939, he was engaged in Nazi propaganda on the radio, while in Germany. Arrested in May 1945 and sentenced to death for treason. Hanged in 1946


In post-war Soviet reference books such as the Great Soviet Encyclopedia, the term "collaborators" has already appeared and was interpreted as: "persons who collaborated with fascist invaders in the countries they occupied during the Second World War 1939-1945." A practically similar explanation of this term was given in "Soviet Encyclopedic Dictionary." Nevertheless, there have been practically no studies on this topic. The concept of “brotherhood of the Soviet peoples” did not allow us to write about all the negative aspects of our common history, and research on this topic was seen as propaganda of nationalism and chauvinism. It is not surprising that they began to investigate the topic of cooperation between Soviet citizens and the enemy only after the collapse of the USSR.


Today we can read such books ...


The Union of Nordic Germans


But Western historians were not connected by ideological frameworks. Moreover, they were especially interested in the participation of "non-Germans" in the SS troops - the elite of the "German nation". After all, the leaders of the Reich have repeatedly stated that "the SS organization is an alliance of specially selected Nordic Germans ...". It was with these words that, for example, the order of Reichsfuhrer SS Himmler of 31 of December 1931 began, according to which a special marriage permit was introduced for all SS men "with the aim of selecting and preserving racial and hereditary pure blood."


Despite the fact that in these publications much attention is paid to uniforms and insignia, they generally represent a good source of information on this topic.


Here, first of all, it should be noted that initially both soldiers, and even more so SS officers, as well as their wives, had to undergo a complex procedure of "racial selection", and in the "special forces of the SS", which appeared already in 1934, and became the prototype of the "SS troops", the selection was even tougher. However, already in June 1944, the number of foreigners in the Wehrmacht and in the SS troops reached 486,6 thousand people, and in all during the war there were at least 1,8 million people. 59 divisions, 23 brigades were formed from foreigners of non-Aryan origin, and besides this, several separate regiments, several special legions and battalions.


But, of course, for truly complete information you need to turn to dissertation research. In principle, all of them are now available: you pay 500 p. and you get the full text of the dissertation on the Internet with all references to sources and the corresponding bibliography on the topic.


The gap between word and deed!


It turns out that it was in the SS troops that foreigners were accepted very willingly! Thus, 12 of the 43 SS divisions were manned by “volunteers of German nationality” from the countries of Northern and Western Europe, that is, not purebred Aryans, but half-blood Germans (and this is very softly said that half-bloods, in many and a quarter of Germanic there was no blood), and even the whole 15 divisions were equipped with “volunteers” of generally non-German nationality who were recruited throughout Europe, and not all of them always went there voluntarily.

How could this happen so that in the elite forces of Nazi Germany there were so many people of "non-German", or even "non-Aryan" origin, previously proclaimed by people of the "lower race"? Slavs, French, Hungarians, Romanians, Albanians, and even people from the mountains of the Caucasus and the "solar republics" of Central Asia - who just did not serve in the SS troops! Why did this happen?


A typical Aryan, right? Portrait of a voluntary assistant to the Wehrmacht - Heavi (Hilfswilliger) with a machine gun MG-34


To begin with, we recall that back in 1940, Gauleiter Essen Terboven, the Reich commissioner of Norway occupied by Germany, said that the Scandinavians are much easier to unite with the Germans than, for example, the same Prussia with Bavaria, that is, northern Germans with southern ones. Norwegians are the same Aryans, he argued (and even more than even some of the Germans, if you mean the same Bavarians), and, if so, then the Norwegians may well become full citizens of the Third Reich. He had the same opinion about the Danes, the inhabitants of the Netherlands, Luxembourg and the Belgians. These were people of "German blood." And if so, then they could consider themselves citizens of Great Germany. Although it may well be that there was no talk of complete equal rights.

Reichsfuhrer SS Himmler held the same opinion. So, in September 1940, on his initiative, the "General SS detachments of Flanders" were created. Two years later, the Netherlands SS also. Well, in May 1941, the Norwegian SS. It seems that they were under the jurisdiction of their pro-fascist leaders. But already in the autumn of 1942, they became part of the organization of the "German SS detachments." And ... were renamed “German SS in Flanders”, “German SS in the Netherlands” and “German SS in Norway”. That is, the German "beginning" came out on top. National - to the second. In April 1943, the Danish “German Corps” (“Schalburg Corps”) was established. The number of all these units amounted to almost 9 thousand people. They were engaged in helping the local police fight the partisans and anti-fascists.


Build a soldier of the Caucasian auxiliary troops of the Wehrmacht


Burgundy - SS State


It is interesting that Reichsführer SS Himmler had plans to create a new German state, Burgundy, in northern Europe, which would include the lands of the Netherlands, Belgium and North-East France. Moreover, all political and state administration were to carry out SS forces here on the basis of their SS code. At the same time, the idea was to unite all the "Nordic blood" in Europe, and to make it so that "never again did the Germans fight against the Germans."


Indian Legion SS "Free India"


Well, in the Reich itself, after the outbreak of war, selection in the SS immediately became significantly less stringent than before. Absolutely non-German surnames, and for some reason, most often Slavic ones, were strewn in the lists of SS formations. For example, in the list of executioners of the Auschwitz concentration camp, such surnames were about 15 – 20%. They ceased to worry about the leaders of the Reich and the SS and the external data of future functionaries. The SS motto: “Your honor is your loyalty” is the only thing the Reichsführer SS required of them.


What a handsome man! Free India Legion Officer


"All the flags of the world to visit us!"


Further more. Although Hitler, in his book Mein Kampf, strongly condemned the French for "spoiling" pure European blood with the blood of blacks and Asians, nevertheless, in the spring of 1944, posters depicting a German soldier in a helmet appeared in many French cities, who demandingly pointed a finger at the person looking at the poster, and with the inscription: "Enroll in the SS troops!" Moreover, these recruiting posters were hung not only in France, but also in other European countries occupied by German troops. And it is clear that for those who had problems with the law, this was a good way to avoid them. Enrolled in the SS and ... "all bribes, smooth." Well, something similar to the situation with the same French Foreign Legion. I got there, and he will save you from prison and from the bag. It’s another matter that then “freedom” had to be practiced with arms in hand, but if someone broke the law, then out of two evils such people had to choose the least, and for many of them the “least” way seemed to be the path of collaboration they chose.

Использованная литература:
1. Drobyazko, S., Karashchuk, A. Eastern volunteers in the Wehrmacht, police and SS. M .: AST, 2000.
2. Kovalev, B. Nazi occupation and collaboration in Russia. 1941-1944. M .: AST, Transitbook, 2004.
3. Carlos Caballero Jurado. Foreign volunteers in the Wehrmacht. 1941-1945. M .: AST, Astrel, 2005.
4. Shabelnik, N. On the Question of Soviet Collaborationism during the Great Patriotic War / Transactions of the Military Space Academy named after A.F. Mozhaysky. Publisher: Military Space Academy named after AF Mozhaysky (St. Petersburg)
5. Gilyazov, I. A. Collaboration movement among Turkic-Muslim prisoners of war and emigrants during the Second World War. Dis. ... dr. Sciences: 07.00.02 Kazan, 2000.
6. Ermolov, I.G. The emergence and development of Soviet military-political collaboration in the occupied territories of the USSR in 1941-1944. Dis. ... ist. Sciences: 07.00.02 Tver, 2005.
7. Shantseva, E. N. Genesis of the partisan movement and collaboration in the Great Patriotic War: the example of the occupied territory of the Bryansk region: August 1941 - September 1943 Dis. ... ist. Sciences: 07.00.02 Bryansk, 2011.
8. Napso, N.T. Eastern legions in the Wehrmacht during the Great Patriotic War 1941 - 1945 Dis. ... to-ist. Sciences: 07.00.02 Maykop, 2000.


To be continued ...
347 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    26 September 2019 21: 27
    Quote: Alexander Green
    Unfortunately, the well-fed and contented man in the street cannot understand the dialectics of the class struggle. The point is that as long as classes exist, class struggle is inevitable. And it was not even Marx who came up with this, but bourgeois scientists.

    IN AND. Lenin even tested Marxists this way. He wrote, “A Marxist is only one who extends the recognition of class struggle to the recognition of the dictatorship of the proletariat.” (PSS, T.33, P.375)

    Class struggle is the struggle of one part of the people against another, the struggle of the mass of disenfranchised, oppressed workers against the privileged, oppressors and parasites, the struggle of hired workers or proletarians against the owners or the bourgeoisie.

    I don't need to quote the classics. And what Marx and Lenin wrote in the last century and the century before last is not suitable for direct transfer now, to the present day. Maybe in the late 90s, during the lawlessness, this was possible, but now it is unlikely that any owner (owner) can afford not to pay wages for months. Most often this ends in ruinous fines for him. No strikes. A more effective means than a rally
    Better tell me where the class struggle of one part of the people against others is going on? Where are the mass strikes of disenfranchised, oppressed workers? Where is the struggle of hired workers against owners? What world do you live in, dear? Brains have finally shifted in the field of class struggle. Just don’t broadcast that the state is hiding all this. I don’t live in a vacuum either. Now everything is simpler. The owner-"exploiter" will go bankrupt if he does not pay what he promised. The workers will leave him. But there are no traces of strikes with political demands, which is what the term “class struggle” implies. Most economic disputes are resolved without all these strikes. The owner should not be considered a complete idiot who only rows for himself. This one burns out “once”
    1. 0
      27 September 2019 16: 59
      Quote: Old26
      What world do you live in, dear? Brains have finally shifted in the field of class struggle.

      Well, you see, you still don’t understand anything. IN AND. Lenin wrote on this occasion that the dark masses learn from their experience. I think that your experience is still ahead.
  2. +2
    27 September 2019 17: 35
    Quote: Alexander Green
    Quote: Old26
    What world do you live in, dear? Brains have finally shifted in the field of class struggle.

    Well, you see, you still don’t understand anything. IN AND. Lenin wrote on this occasion that the dark masses learn from their experience. I think that your experience is still ahead.

    Certainly. You are so advanced. You know everything, you understand everything. How dark are we? Are you dreaming of another bloodbath for our long-suffering state? And do you see yourself among the leaders??? Or maybe revolutions are enough and it’s better to follow the evolutionary path??
    1. +1
      27 September 2019 20: 39
      Quote: Old26
      Are you dreaming of another bloodbath for our long-suffering state?

      Firstly, there was no bloodbath for the people in the USSR; better look at the dynamics of population growth. But the current “gas chamber” is actually reducing the population in Russia and in other republics. The mortality rate has already significantly exceeded the birth rate
      But revolutions do not ask us; they mature on their own where there is class inequality.
  3. +3
    28 September 2019 11: 51
    Quote: Alexander Green
    Firstly, there was no bloodbath for the people in the USSR; better look at the dynamics of population growth. .

    Yah? Wasn't there a Civil War when brother killed brother? Did not have? Well, the dynamics of growth is a thing that depends, in particular, on how rich people live. When in the 90s people did not know how to feed themselves and their loved ones, there was no time for a demographic explosion. There was a hole. Demogarphic

    Quote: Alexander Green
    But the current “gas chamber” is actually reducing the population in Russia and in other republics. The mortality rate has already significantly exceeded the birth rate.

    It's shrinking, of course. Especially since 2009. In 2009 the population was 141,903 million. In 2010, it “reduced” to 142,856 million people. In 2-11 it further “decreased” and became 142,865 million people. Accordingly, in 2012 it decreased to 143,256 million people, the next year it “reduced” to 143,347. And so on until 2018. When the population once again decreased and became 143,88 million people. You are distorting, dear. But this is understandable. Manipulation to show how bad things are is not new. Come up with something new.

    Quote: Alexander Green
    But revolutions do not ask us; they mature on their own where there is class inequality.

    They take decades to mature. But basically they are being “pushed”. And there will be inequality. Call it either class or economic. The population lives differently. One is trying to make money, the other is happy with everything. Therefore, one person’s monthly income is, for example, 70-90 thousand, and the other’s is 10 thousand. No, of course you can, just like in the days of the USSR, take it equally for everyone. Make the same salary - and all the debt will be short. True, there will be no enthusiasm, no desire to do something, which means development will come to naught.
    1. 0
      28 September 2019 18: 51
      Quote: Old26
      Manipulation to show how bad things are is not new.

      Unlike the majority, you managed to settle down in this life, and you think that it will always be so, but alas, fortune is a fickle girl and very often it happens that it suddenly turns around... and it is quite possible for you to become a real proletarian, and then your consciousness will change...

      Quote: Old26
      Come up with something new.

      Everything new is well forgotten old. Discontent is brewing among the people, which sooner or later will result in a powerful uprising against capital. Only real capitalists will flee abroad, but their henchmen may not succeed, and it is likely that the accumulated hatred of the people will spill out on them.
  4. -2
    28 September 2019 12: 28
    I would like to look at our current proletarian dictator... It will be something...
    1. 0
      28 September 2019 18: 58
      Quote: kalibr
      I would like to look at our current proletarian dictator... It will be something...

      Nothing special, ordinary people...
  5. -2
    28 September 2019 21: 54
    Too ordinary to manage today's complex world. They don’t know how not to step or say a word. A country where this herd at least temporarily gains power will inevitably fall into chaos and become easy prey for stronger states, where specialists with diplomas from well-known universities rule, and not professors of a broom, a machine and a sewing machine. I know many “ordinary people”. You can even talk to some of them for a while, pretending that you are listening to their nonsense. All! Separated, like tightening nut No. 7, they are nothing, a weaver in a sewing workshop... She can not only sew, but also bake delicious buns. But a little higher and solid 000 in everything. By the way, a person is a slave by definition and from birth, and not at all by place of work. But they don't understand this. That means... full... and so on in everything. It’s not slaves who don’t ask, they don’t walk around with placards saying “give it to us.” They take everything they need for themselves!
    1. 0
      29 September 2019 00: 35
      Quote: kalibr
      Too ordinary to manage today's complex world. They don’t know how not to step or say a word.

      It is not the gods who burn the pots... They will learn... They will establish Soviet power, which will provide training for all workers in the management of both production and the state. Remember 1917, workers' control.

      Quote: kalibr
      It’s not slaves who don’t ask, ..... They take for themselves everything they need!

      Here, do you mean ordinary bandits who take away wallets, or clever “grabbers” who deceitfully appropriated for themselves everything that was built by the people?
      1. -4
        29 September 2019 00: 44
        Quote: Alexander Green
        It is not the gods who burn the pots... They will learn... They will establish Soviet power, which will ensure...

        Apparently you live in a parallel world? What the hell is “power”?

        In my world, an attempt to “pump” a country leads to external control of this country, see the example of “external”. Or to stumbling the country into the Stone Age - see Libya, for example. Is this exactly what you want? For some reason I'm not request
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. +1
          29 September 2019 16: 27
          Quote: Cat Man Null
          In my world, an attempt to “rock” a country leads to external control of this country...

          If you mean Navalny, then this is not our world.

          Quote: Cat Man Null
          . Libya, for example

          You are confusing the socialist revolution, which is carried out by the people, with a bourgeois revolution with the help of external imperialist forces.
  6. -1
    29 September 2019 16: 20
    Quote: Alexander Green
    Remember 1917, workers' control.

    I remember... and I remember how long it took to teach them at least something. And they exercised control with the help of the “former” ones, and they made a good profit from it. And how long will it take to study? You yourself write all the time “the working class is learning,” “the defeated armies are learning.” They study for so long and everyone doesn’t learn? And having received power, there will be no incentive to study at all. You can't teach an old dog new tricks. Meanwhile, other countries will move further and further forward. And you will have to call your exes - and everything will turn around again, and there will be special rations, special clinics, someone will turn out to be more equal than others... But a lot of blood will be shed. Now many more people have something to lose.
    And I’m not writing about bandits, but about people with intelligence. You can, without breaking the laws, take everything that others, with their stupidity, cannot take! And deception... but don’t be deceived! Again the question of lack of intelligence...
    1. 0
      29 September 2019 21: 44
      Quote: kalibr
      And how long will it take to study?

      The common people are much smarter and wiser than you think about them, and the best representatives of the intelligentsia will side with the proletariat and help them, and then, you see, the youth will grow up.
      As a former teacher of the History of the CPSU, you understand this very well and are afraid of it, and therefore you go crazy, throwing mud at socialism, hoping that this will slow down its arrival.
      But you won’t succeed, it’s like... doing something against the wind.
  7. -1
    29 September 2019 16: 32
    Quote: Alexander Green
    the accumulated hatred of the people will spill out on them

    Most likely, the fire of six-barreled machine guns will splash out on these rebels. However, soon they will introduce universal microchipping of people in developed countries and all problems will be solved in one day and forever.
    1. 0
      29 September 2019 21: 34
      Quote: kalibr
      Most likely, the fire of six-barreled machine guns will splash out on these rebels. However, soon they will introduce universal microchipping of people in developed countries and all problems will be solved in one day and forever.

      Chipization is still a fantasy, but even if this happens, it will still not help either you or the bourgeoisie. Look at foreign blockbusters (also fantastic), even the chipped ones are rebelling there. This shows that people abroad understand what class struggle is and that it cannot be abolished.
  8. -1
    29 September 2019 16: 52
    Quote: Alexander Green
    You are confusing the socialist revolution that the people are making

    So far, your people are doing this much more successfully!
    1. 0
      29 September 2019 21: 26
      Quote: kalibr
      So far, your people are doing this much more successfully!

      There is nothing surprising in this, it’s all from the hopeless current life.
      But history shows that this will pass. My grandfather knew Pyotr Andreevich Zalomov (by the way, he was the prototype of Pavel Vlasov in the novel “Mother” by M. Gorky) and said that in his youth, out of hopelessness, he also laid down hard, but then, having got into a Marxist circle, he realized what had to be done to change life.
  9. -1
    29 September 2019 21: 49
    Quote: Alexander Green
    This shows that people abroad understand what class struggle is and that it cannot be abolished.

    This suggests that people know how to make money and with what. Sweet crap is always a pleasure to watch. A fool always needs to be shown his importance, and that he can do anything, and not what he really is. Will anyone watch this too?
    1. -1
      30 September 2019 18: 05
      Quote: kalibr
      This suggests that people know how to make money and with what.

      Yes, there are people who stop at nothing, even crime, and the ideology of such people is very similar to the one you preach.
  10. -1
    29 September 2019 21: 54
    Quote: Alexander Green
    and the best representatives of the intelligentsia will take the side of the proletariat and help it, and then, you see, the youth will grow up.

    Why would they take the side of those whom they despise, if not in words, then in their souls? And from whom will the youth learn? And how long will it take until she learns? During this time, normal countries will simply eat us up! Well, poor people with intelligence and intelligence cannot become managers of complex factories and production facilities, negotiate on equal terms with diplomats with Oxford diplomas and trade on an electronic exchange. And no one who knows how to share all this with the lower classes will want to. Why? It's like emptying your pockets to a thief voluntarily.
    1. -1
      30 September 2019 18: 09
      Quote: kalibr
      Why would they take the side of those whom they despise, if not in words, then in their souls?

      Only people like you despise people, but I have met only a few people like you. Mostly I met honest, open people, without any arrogance.
  11. 0
    30 September 2019 18: 21
    Quote: Alexander Green
    Mostly I met honest, open people, without any arrogance.

    But the poor, and now they are not the ones who decide. And again, not all rich people break the law. There is no need to think in the traditions of Proudhon. Today you can easily make money... just on the time difference. When, for example, the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant exploded, we raised our broker in the middle of the night to buy shares in Japanese construction companies, and while others were “calving” they made very decent money from it. Having invested ten thousand each, they ended up earning several hundred thousand each. And everything is according to the law. And also according to the law today we get %. But this, of course, is for the smart ones. Because many people, even if they have money, keep it in Sberbank and do not use it.
    1. -1
      1 October 2019 16: 52
      Quote: kalibr
      When, for example, the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant exploded, we raised our broker in the middle of the night to buy shares in Japanese construction companies, and while others were “calving” they made very decent money from it. Having invested ten thousand each, they ended up earning several hundred thousand each. And everything is according to the law. And also according to the law today we get %. But this, of course, is for the smart ones.

      You made money from Fukushima. Money, of course, does not smell, but this path is not for the smart, but for the cunning, for those who are ready to profit from the misfortune of others. And this is not earnings, this is the redistribution of money taken from working people.
  12. The comment was deleted.
  13. 0
    1 October 2019 16: 57
    Quote: Alexander Green
    this is all from the hopeless current life.

    Why did they drink so much in the USSR then? From happiness that there was a lot of booze?
  14. The comment was deleted.
  15. 0
    16 October 2019 01: 23
    Actual topic.
  16. The comment was deleted.
  17. 0
    April 10 2020 14: 49
    One should not be surprised at the abundance of Nazi collaborators. And to call everyone “traitors” is to greatly simplify the situation (i.e. to falsify history!).
    Which Russia was betrayed by those who hoped to free Russia from Bolshevism with the help of Hitler?? Many believed that they were fighting for Russia, against the “Bolshevik usurpers.” Yes, their choice was shortsighted and ultimately criminal. But their motivations are easy to understand. In Bolshevik Russia, too many social groups suffered - the former ruling classes, the bourgeoisie, the clergy, part of the intelligentsia, the wealthy peasantry, the Cossacks. The Baltic countries, culturally and religiously alien to Russia and gravitating towards Germany and Poland, were forced into Soviet Russia.
    There were so many offended... Not all of them were crushed, destroyed or emigrated - they themselves and their children remained in the USSR, remembering the humiliations, requisitions, bloody massacres and rapes. And harboring an unquenchable thirst for revenge. And when the German Nazis came, many of them greeted the “liberators” with jubilation, the opening of churches and reprisals against the Bolsheviks and Komsomol members
    (many of whom, just yesterday, were themselves perpetrating the Red Terror on the ground - compiling lists of defeatists entitled to eviction and “imprisonment”),

    The choice was difficult, see the publication by A. Puchenkov, O. Romanko, S. Mashkevich “Denikin A.I. General Vlasov and the Vlasovites”:
    Denikin had a special relationship with the Vlasov movement. Here the facets of Denikin as a politician are most clearly visible: a Russian patriot who does not recognize any possibility of cooperation with the Nazi regime, which is bringing enslavement to the Russian people, and a convinced anti-communist who hates and despises Soviet power as, in his opinion, a deeply anti-national phenomenon.


    The Western World was also experiencing a crisis. There were several forces, relatively speaking:
    -totalitarian regimes (Bolshevik USSR, National Socialism in Germany)
    -liberal-bourgeois democracies (USA, UK, France and many other European countries)
    -authoritarian-nationalist regimes (Pilsudski's Poland, Mennerheim's Finland,...)
    - "fascist" regimes (Mussolini and Franco, both fundamentally anti-communist)
    Plus, in each country there were more or less noticeable mixtures of different ideologies (leftists of all shades from “anarchists” to “Stalinists”, fascists, nationalists, etc., see the situation in Spain)
    For example, in Britain and France there were sympathizers of Francoism and Italian fascism. And even those who sympathize with Nazism, because (a) many saw authoritarian leaders as protection from the “reds”,
    (b) anti-Semitic sentiments were traditionally strong in Europe, and the rapid emancipation and enrichment of individual Jews in the interwar period greatly irritated many Europeans.

    In Europe there were vast disputed territories, unresolved conflicts between countries that were “fragments” of empires (Austro-Hungarian, Turkish and Russian). Colonialism was still alive, and some peoples relied on the enemies of their conquerors. In WWI, the Germans in Africa raised black Africans against the British under anti-colonial slogans. Witnesses noted that the attitude of the Germans towards the black militias was then much more humane and comradely than that of the British, who were accustomed to seeing blacks only as slaves. In WWI, the Germans actively tried to play the “Irish card” in Britain. And the British artificially united the Arabs under nationalist slogans against the Turks and Germans
    (through the efforts of T.E. Lawrence "of Arabia" and Emir Faisal). And who, tell me, was “betrayed” by the Hindus oppressed by the British who fought in the ranks of the German-Nazi troops? - their British oppressors??
    What about the Pacific-Asian direction? What is there in the French, Belgian, Dutch colonies?
    Should we call “traitors” those figures in the national liberation movements who collaborated with the Japanese against the European colonialists?

    In this “soup of contradictions” we need to talk about “traitors” very carefully. Although, there are many on this resource for whom everything is “simple”: “for ours”? - ours, “not for ours?” - enemy and traitor. But the world is too complex for assessments based on “Bolshevik propaganda.”