What and to whom Trump showed a missile strike on Syria?

April 14 2018 331

An adventure, started by the United States in Syria, only at first glance may seem an adventure. In fact, the order given by Trump to the military, who themselves even a few hours ago stated that “it is worth waiting for evidence of the use of chemical weapons", Serves as the achievement of several goals for Trump himself, and for all of the United States.

firstwhat Trump has achieved showed the American top that he is a “cool cowboy” who “makes America strong again”. And the top, judging by the comments in the American press, is ready to accept Trump's "cool cowboy" for granted. It did not work with the “rocket man” Kim Jong-un - see how cleverly it turns out against the “animal Assad”. Incidentally, this is an involuntary signal to those states that refuse to develop nuclear technologies: there are no nuclear weapons - we will bomb you if your policy does not suit us ... Trump is trying to return to the format of what he holds his presidential word.

Second. This is the goal of the American military-industrial complex. It consists in doing everything to carry out an attempt to discredit the Russian air defense and missile defense systems. Signal of Saudi Arabia, Turkey, India and others - they say, think, guys, and not for nothing that you agree with these russians to buy them anti-aircraft missile systems? “We will still launch as many Tomahawks as necessary, and we will not be stopped.” At the same time it is a signal to us, Russia. The signal about how it is necessary to build an anti-missile defense system in modern conditions, which, as current practice shows, have nothing to do with what it was before. Although everything is common. They wanted to bomb the US Belgrade - bombed. They wanted to bomb Damascus - one-time, but bombed.

The third. The United States frankly admits that they wanted to spit on international missions, including the OPCW, on any investigations, and will do what stems from their own interests, even if they are contrary to common sense.

All this, by definition, can not be ignored.

The smoke from the missile strikes of the American-French-British coalition over Damascus:

What and to whom Trump showed a missile strike on Syria?

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Seaflame

+1

April 14 2018 13: 57

It is clear that ours will sink Kuk and shoot down Amer’s planes only in the event of an attack on Tartus and Khmeimim. Nevertheless, this is a slap in our direction. Of course, I’m glad that I didn’t have to run under the howl of civil defense sirens under the arches of the metro. But this cannot be left without attention. Moreover, we have someone to answer, the Ukrobanders did not return Nord and its crew, they constantly violate the truce in Donbass and are leading the civilian population to a humanitarian catastrophe.. Well, they honestly deserve 100 Iskanders!
TOR2

0

April 14 2018 13: 59

I would like to add one more point to the article. Here's your first inauguration gift. And the goals of this gift are specific. All statements that will be heard from the Kremlin will not be perceived as comical. It is necessary, first of all, for a certain part of the population to turn away from the first. To achieve this goal, you should not attack well-protected objects; an ordinary barn will do. The main thing is that the barn burns spectacularly.
What we needed to do was ours. It was possible to arrange some kind of “kid joke” based on the situation.
1. troll
  
  0
  
  April 14 2018 14: 30
  
  Dear, you obviously missed when you promised to launch missiles at American bases for a raid “on any target in SYRIA.”
Xnumx vis

0

April 14 2018 14: 19

Quote: rkkasa 81
Already weak.

In any case, stronger than in the late nineties.. So, it is no longer as weak as after the collapse of the USSR. Under Borusik and Kozyrev.
The comment was deleted.
Alexander Avgusmanov

0

April 14 2018 14: 39

The greed of our Russian elite ruined the Syrians! But the Guardians offered an alliance on mutual terms, but the government did not fulfill the condition! The guards left the Russians. And as soon as intelligence reported to Donald about the departure of strong Russian allies, I don’t know how they got wind of it, of course, but the fact is clear. Trump became bolder and gave the order to attack immediately; the Russians had nothing to respond to; the technological base that made the Russians strong was taken back by the guards. This is what happens when you don’t want to meet someone halfway who extends a helping hand! God will punish Russia for opposing the demands of His messengers.
1. VeneraNina200
  
  0
  
  April 14 2018 19: 57
  
  Pray to God not to punish Russia, Syria and Iran are the last stronghold of the Middle Eastern States
  and Russia will not be a keeper; Russia will not be and neither will the Middle Eastern States. The Anglo-Saxons need
  rich mineral resources and not the peoples of these states will have an unenviable fate. The Hegemon will be completely satisfied
  the population is tiny and no one can prevent this. The Chinese and Indians will be closed within the borders of their territories, they will eat themselves. There is only room on the ball for the Anglo-Saxon golden billion. The President said why do we need such a world if there is no
  Russia, the population of SHARIK - those who do not fit into the golden billion, pray for
  Russian power
troll

0

April 14 2018 14: 40

sabakina,
the weak were beaten. they beat and will beat. the smart ones defend the country on foreign lands, and the fellows care about their business
BOPOH50

0

April 14 2018 15: 10

In general, the point is not in the USA, Britain and France, but in the appearance of the US Emperor, the French Emperor and the new Queen of Britain, this attack is not on Syria, but on democracy, which is so preached by European civilization, these newly minted monarchs independently made a decision, bypassing their parliaments and congresses, not to mention international institutions (which, in general, dance to the tune of the United States)
Geneshvi

+1

April 14 2018 16: 28

Almost a day has passed since the missile attack on Syria. No reaction from the Kremlin is heard or seen, different media give different information, whether 13 missiles out of 33 were shot down, or 70 out of 110. Regardless of the numbers, in any media, this is true will not be. Until a consolidated position is developed, should we read the news on CNN or the BBC? Maybe it’s enough to stop treating your citizens as cattle, maybe it’s worth trying to tell the truth?
caiman

0

April 14 2018 17: 02

Of course, there are now a lot of strategists writing here, but I think the most effective action would be, of course, not to give an answer, but to connect with the Syrians and intercept all the missiles, unless, of course, our military experts are not empty-headed, and indeed our modern air defenses are good together with the electronic warfare, That was it it would be indicative, They say, your tomahawks are on our sides, and think about it further, Although to be honest, I very much doubt that in fact the attack was repelled only by Syrian air defense, and if this is so, then all our statements after such a fiasco... in a word we're in trouble
Mentat

0

April 14 2018 17: 42

Quote: Svarog
Quote: MIKHAN
Quote: Svarog
Putin constantly wants to take amert on a show off, but it doesn’t work, but he threatened to destroy the carriers, so what? Again in a puddle? And this approach in all of us is a complete idle talk ...

Russia is still weak .. If you fight, it’s only for complete destruction! Well, Donald, well, cool guy all the same .. heh heh

Duck, why shame, it’s clear that it’s weak and will always be like that, what to expect from the heir to Gorbachev-Yeltsin .. But why shame, why shout to the whole world, that we will give an answer, you just had to keep silent on Trump’s statement .. at least at least, reputational losses would not be like that ... Although our government has a habit now, promise everyone and not fulfill it ..

The only one who is disgraced here is you and those who gave you advantages from the same gop company. After all, you know very well the context of the statements of the Russian leadership, but you still write your inadequate opuses here. Everything is clear to everyone. The only thing is that it is not clear what audience you are counting on? Even interesting.
In Russia, only schoolchildren, and not all of them, and a certain specific part of students are at this level of development. It seems that your... messages are molded according to patterns that were created based on samples from the population of illiterate Arab countries or Africa; in extreme cases, raguli under vodka are probably able to perceive this.
Even the drunken “Uncle Vasya” in Russia, suffering without a hangover, will not believe what you are talking about here. So who do you constantly write to and who gives you pluses, accomplices?
1. Svarog
  
  +3
  
  April 15 2018 14: 24
  
  Quote: Mentat
  It seems that your... messages are molded according to patterns that were created based on samples from the population of illiterate Arab countries or Africa
  
  So, in terms of per capita income, we are Africa, didn’t you know? Gabon is one place ahead.
  Quote: Mentat
  Even the drunken “Uncle Vasya” in Russia, suffering without a hangover, will not believe what you are talking about here. So who do you constantly write to and who gives you pluses, accomplices?
  
  Yes, the positives reflect how the majority of Russian people perceived the Foreign Ministry’s statement.
  Quote: Mentat
  The only thing is that it is not clear what audience you are counting on? Even interesting.
  
  I don’t count on an audience at all, I express my thoughts And as the positives show, I’m not alone... unlike you.
Farpost

0

April 14 2018 18: 00

I wouldn't force it.
Let's look at the results of this entire performance:
1. The Syrians were aware in advance of the date and time of the attack, the coordinates of the targets and possibly even the coordinates of the missile carriers, which allowed them to evacuate the population from these places in a week and, I think, the most valuable material resources, as well as prepare air defense positions.
2. Not a single missile entered or flew over the area of responsibility of Russian air defense crews
3. France declared its participation, but never launched a single missile
4. The damage compared to the costs is simply ridiculous.

Hence the conclusion: Trump had to throw a bone to the US country elite and the military-industrial complex, and at the same time silence the hawks in politics, well, like we’re cool... Impudent people, as always, are a pug on a leash, there’s nothing even to analyze here.
The bone has been thrown, resources have been wasted, the bubble of coolness has been inflated politically and nothing more.

Of course, agreements were reached between Trump and Putin in advance, otherwise the result of the attack and the awareness of the Syrians cannot be explained.
Ours probably also got some goodies, I think that they worked out the actions of the missile defense crews during a massive attack with cruise missiles, at the same time they registered the real frequencies and marks from the latest Tomahawks and English missiles, I think that they also checked the electronic warfare on some targets...

So, there is no need to tense up and wave your fists, everything is according to plan...
1. bone1
  
  0
  
  April 14 2018 21: 57
  
  Russia screwed up its plan, and the blow to Syria is not the last.
2. bone1
  
  0
  
  April 14 2018 21: 57
  
  Russia screwed up its plan, and the blow to Syria is not the last.
den_sibirskiy

0

April 14 2018 19: 32

Will we ever live to see our people start using their own methods?!
I think it's long overdue.
-America struck at the base where the Russians were located!! 1 million people have died, we will respond by hitting the Pentagon, or sinking all the ships near the borders. America wait for the rocket.
It's stupid, of course, but what can you do?
Santa Claus

0

April 14 2018 20: 09

US bases on the territory of Syria need to be gouged under this boiling
PValery53

0

April 14 2018 21: 45

“What and to whom did Trump show with a missile strike on Syria?”
- The fact that the world “progressive community” has the right to “pull its eye on ... its eyes””
Someone from the fleet

0

April 14 2018 21: 51

What did you show? The truth is that there are empty lies in the leadership. Not a single missile carrier was shot down or sunk.
bone1

0

April 14 2018 21: 54

Trump showed that he has "balls" - GDP - that he doesn't have them.
nikoliski

-1

April 15 2018 00: 22

He didn’t prove anything to the American elite, even the Democrats were against the strike (as well as against everything that this elderly senile man is planning), but personally this strike showed me that the American tomahawks are shit, which must be replaced with hypersonic missiles like our dagger, otherwise with such NATO members have no chance of attacking the Russian Federation, they can’t fight on the ground without first destroying everything from the air with impunity, and as we see their missiles are very successfully shot down, I think it would be better if grandpa didn’t disgrace himself if they also hit the DPRK or Iran without ICBMs with nuclear warheads also won’t do a damn thing, in short, America sucks, there was a lot of noise, the result of the bombing is much weaker than from the raids of Hitler’s Junkers, both of which were more useful, as it turns out)
Дядя_Vаanya

0

April 15 2018 07: 03

What have you achieved?...he is a handsome man among his people, our handsome man among us - trolling in action.
l7yzo

0

April 15 2018 07: 39

Reminds me of an American teen film. The bad guy goes around beating everyone up at school. And someone should answer him)
tv70

0

April 15 2018 08: 11

The crap of humanity, thieves, murderers, and other scoundrels, flocked to America from all over the world. It is foolish to expect anything different from their descendants. It would seem that they should have devoured themselves long ago, but alas. Scumbags only understand the answer, rudeness must be responded to with rudeness, only such language is understood by the crazy ones.
The comment was deleted.
The comment was deleted.
Konstantin

+1

April 15 2018 09: 40

Many people write that they didn’t hurt ours. But why are ours there? To protect them there? So sit at home. Or is it still to protect the Syrian people and Syrian cities? They’ve crap out of nowhere. One wrote correctly in the comments, they spat in our faces, but we’re happy that we didn’t get in. And now we’re convening the UN!!! Like they don’t send us there.... It’s not the authorities, but one redneck with grandmas on his mind. And they wanted us and their opinion about us.
Kudrevkn

0

April 15 2018 11: 18

I agree with the Author’s postulate regarding “nuclear deterrence” - there is a “roll-up” against Iran! Regarding Putin’s (Russian Federation) answer, everything is also clear - rudeness cannot be left unanswered!? Just the question: “HOW TO ANSWER, that is, in the words of Lelik, “hit carefully, but hard”???? I believe that 2-4 MiG 31s should be transferred to Khmeimim to practice intercepting Tomahawks in the air! And one more important detail - "black mark" or "partnership warning" was proposed to be voiced to Macron (call to Putin)? When the SAR with Iranian "Scats" inflicts a "retaliation" in return "courtesy" Putin should warn "brother" Macron 30 minutes in advance about the evacuation of only French special forces, “forgetting” to call your English and American “partners”?
Svarog

+2

April 15 2018 13: 54

Nyrobsky,
The assumption is correct in theory, but we’ll see in practice.. But my main idea is, don’t chatter, and if you say it, do it..
shadow

0

April 15 2018 14: 50

The Americans showed their complete powerlessness, that’s what happened.
APASUS

0

April 15 2018 14: 56

WAR! SYRIA UNDER ATTACK: Trump Orders Strikes on Syria Over Suspected Chemical Weapons Attack

Again this fool from Lugansk, an MLRS strike on the city at night.
The author of materials for VO needs to take checking source codes more seriously.
gosha.cazakov2016

0

April 15 2018 16: 32

Opinion:
The fact has happened, three states spit on the UN Charter. Hence the conclusion:
The UN is not fulfilling the task that was intended after the end of the Second World War. The new fascist regime is making its way. The presence of Russia in this organization is useless, as is the presence of other states, and its existence in general.
Second: Let's pay tribute to our scientists, designers and engineers who created weapons capable of working against more modern enemy weapons. Nothing to say, well done!
Third: If it is clear with the United States, then England and France have openly shown what kind of “partners” they are to us. We tried not to focus on their, to put it mildly, inadequate and European origin. But now I think it is quite adequate to minimize diplomatic relations with them and make it clear that in the event of any bad actions against us or our citizens, they will be the first to be destroyed.
Can you tell me where this bloodthirstiness comes from? Everything is simple from a military point of view. All states talk about their democratic elections. The one they choose as their leader is the spokesman for THEIR INTERESTS. Those. they think the same as those they chose. In this case, in front of me is a crowd of rabid enemies. In a field war, yes, children, women and the elderly are outlaws. But such “selective” weapons arriving from space have not yet been invented. Collective responsibility sets in.
Solution: either re-elect yourself or think about who you choose, or war and collective responsibility.
DasIst

0

April 15 2018 19: 18

And at the UN, during discussions in the Soviet Union. Meringue needs to switch to bird language understandable to the uncivilized. I should ask the same Hayley and her frothy English friend. What would you say, Hayley, if a certain country reported that it had “irrefutable” evidence that it molested minors and then engaged in cannibalism? This can be supported by some guests of the murdered. Russia can insist that this information is “highly likely” and announce a reward for the one who takes the life of this monster in the amount of at least 10 million dollars with a guarantee of issuing a left passport and plastic surgery like Rodchenkov (not to be remembered by night).
In response to cries about illegality, the presumption of innocence, and so on, remind her how she bombed hundreds of thousands of women and children in Libya, Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, and then declare that those who put themselves above the law consider themselves the law itself fall out of the legal field and become outlaws. With such people, you can do whatever you want on a completely legal basis. As soon as a resident of the “city on a hill” feels in her own skin and personally tries on how comfortable it is to live outside the law, her consciousness will change.
So don't dig a hole for someone else. You will fall into it yourself.
The comment was deleted.