Military Review

Sputnik made the top 5 Russian weapons in Syria

46
By launching an antiterrorist operation in Syria, Moscow managed to change the situation in favor of the Syrian troops, while the Russian military demonstrated during the attacks on terrorists their capabilities weapons, the article says the agency Sputnik, which leads RIA News.




Having made the top 5 of Russian weapons, which “debuted” in Syria, the agency put the Su-35 fighters first.

“The fighter’s impressive combat effectiveness has already attracted the attention of many potential buyers around the world,” the authors emphasized.

Second place at the Caliber. “In October 2015, the world“ suddenly ”realized that Russia possessed the latest long-range cruise missiles. Then from the ships of the Caspian fleet The Russian Navy launched Caliber missiles, which hit several IS targets from a distance of several hundred miles. ”

The Tu-160 bomber was on the third line of the rating. “Tu-160, as a rule, is perceived as a deterrent system for the delivery of nuclear weapons, capable of covering a distance of up to 14000 km without refueling. However, in Syria, these aircraft destroyed a number of IS objects with conventional ammunition, such as KAB-500 adjustable bombs, high-precision aviation X-29L air-to-surface missiles and X-101 air-based cruise missiles. ”

The TOC-1A salvo-fire system "Solntsep" took the 4 line. “Its thermobaric projectiles proved to be particularly effective in mountainous areas, since the TOC-1A blast wave resonates and amplifies in a closed area - an unpleasant surprise for the IG fighters who tried to use the highland areas to escape,” writes the publication.

The fifth position was taken by the BTR-82 - “an invaluable tool for every infantry operation”.

“The 30-mm automatic cannon, paired with the 7,62-mm machine gun, practically breaks concrete structures, while digital guidance systems ensure that visibility will not be disturbed even at night,” the authors note.
Photos used:
Artem Zhitenev / RIA "News"
46 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Mama_Cholli
    Mama_Cholli 29 February 2016 16: 02
    46
    Strange, but the hard workers attack aircraft and bombers Su 34, 25, 24 who plowed these bearded men, for some reason, are not recognized in the top weapons ...
    Well and turntables.

    Pisi: It's commonplace, yes? !!!
    1. Stirbjorn
      Stirbjorn 29 February 2016 16: 07
      20
      But the SU-35 fighter was hit) the bearded aircraft do not have how to evaluate its combat effectiveness
      1. Pravdarm
        Pravdarm 29 February 2016 16: 11
        20
        Well, they could not say: "Russia has everything - the Highest class !!!"
        Therefore, the TOP-5! And not 10, 20, ...!
        And then "partners" will be as usual! laughing Protect so shaky mental state!
        1. cniza
          cniza 29 February 2016 16: 16
          +5
          Quote: Pravdarm
          Well, they could not say: "Russia has everything - the Highest class !!!"
          Therefore, the TOP-5! And not 10, 20, ...!
          And then "partners" will be as usual! laughing


          Let the adversaries scratch their turnips, but just do not relax ...
      2. sub307
        sub307 29 February 2016 16: 27
        +4
        Stirbjorn
        "And the SU-35 fighter hit) the bearded aviation does not have how to evaluate its combat effectiveness."
        Exactly, it seems that the Sputnik agency is not engaged in compiling "ratings" by the experts on the topic .... As a result, the ratings do not shine with the depth of analysis, so ... just to be at least "noted in the media space"
      3. NEXUS
        NEXUS 29 February 2016 17: 27
        +5
        Quote: Stirbjorn
        But the SU-35 fighter was hit) the bearded aircraft do not have how to evaluate its combat effectiveness

        And for the assessment it’s not necessary to get into a fight with such a fighter ... it’s enough that all NATO flyers stay away from it.
        With regards to attack aircraft, bombers and Triumphs, they were noted long before the appearance of Pinocchio and Su-35s. hi
      4. GSH-18
        GSH-18 29 February 2016 21: 20
        +1
        Quote: Stirbjorn
        But the SU-35 fighter was hit) the bearded aircraft do not have how to evaluate its combat effectiveness

        Like a multi-functional fighter. Effective cover for bombers, escort, reconnaissance, target designation, missile strikes and bombing, and much more, about which they will not tell us on TV!
        And you thought he threw it there for beauty? lol
      5. Blondy
        Blondy 29 February 2016 21: 24
        0
        Well, what is there to worry about. Look who the expert is - a news agency. They are "experts" in all areas, like a rooster: he crowed - and there, at least the sun does not rise.
        You ask them, by what criteria they are allocated places, except for "I like it or not like it". These are journalists - and that says it all.
        And also note - in the first place is what can be successfully sold, although the Su 35 has not shot down a single plane. Caliber with swans does not shine - they were moved. But what about the rest of the planes? They have earned their reputation in business and do not need additional advertising.
        For real assessments, you need to go somewhere at the general staff, and even then, for sure, opinions will be divided there.
      6. Vladimir 23rus
        Vladimir 23rus 29 February 2016 23: 36
        0
        They apparently did not evaluate effectiveness against bearded men good
    2. Scoun
      Scoun 29 February 2016 16: 09
      12
      Quote: Mama_Cholli
      Strange but hard workers stormtroopers and bombers

      just then all five places would be occupied by airplanes, and here one copy was chosen among the airplanes, then a cruise missile, then Strategist Tu-160 surprised, then "Solntsepёk" and BTR-82.
      In my humble opinion, the S-400 system is deliberately silenced here, which by its appearance has streamlined the air traffic of all the so-called "coalitions".
      1. Altona
        Altona 29 February 2016 16: 12
        +6
        Quote: Scoun
        just then all five places would be occupied by airplanes and here one copy was chosen among the airplanes, then a cruise missile, then the Strategist then surprised by the "Solntsepёk" and the BTR-82.

        -------------------
        The same media people make ratings. The criteria probably was the mention in some media reports or articles. No need to just so groan and be amazed. The main thing is PR our technology and capabilities.
        1. Scoun
          Scoun 29 February 2016 16: 21
          +2
          Quote: Altona
          The same media people make ratings.

          Then the "Solntsepek" and the BTR-82 fall out here, and then the media people should have noted the Mi-24 with their carousel and low height, and here the members of the forum wrote how many "demanding" a photo report on "Solntsepek", but on YouTube and other resources, only a couple shooting and all and descriptions of practically inflicted damage is not found (from the side of the broads as well). IMHA. )))
      2. weksha50
        weksha50 29 February 2016 16: 33
        +4
        Quote: Scoun
        In my humble opinion, the S-400 system is deliberately silenced here, which by its appearance has streamlined the air traffic of all the so-called "coalitions".



        And they somehow forgot about the electronic dome over the air base, on which the Amers complained that not everyone could spy, hear ...
      3. nemez
        nemez 29 February 2016 19: 34
        0
        at least they have no desire to test the s-400, so they began to fly with our knowledge.
      4. GSH-18
        GSH-18 29 February 2016 21: 23
        +1
        Quote: Scoun
        In my humble opinion, the S-400 system is deliberately silenced here, which by its appearance has streamlined the air traffic of all the so-called "coalitions".

        Rather, it nullified the bespontovy ardor of the Perdogan and his "brave" pilots from the outside.
    3. GSH-18
      GSH-18 29 February 2016 21: 16
      +1
      Quote: Mama_Cholli
      Strange, but the hard workers attack aircraft and bombers Su 34, 25, 24 who plowed these bearded men, for some reason, are not recognized in the top weapons ...
      Well and turntables.

      That's why it is TOP that everything new and cool is rated request
  2. dorz
    dorz 29 February 2016 16: 03
    11
    The sixth point, you can still add the presence of brains.
    1. amirbek
      amirbek 29 February 2016 18: 11
      +5
      better first point
  3. Vladimirets
    Vladimirets 29 February 2016 16: 04
    16
    "The impressive combat effectiveness of the fighter has already attracted the attention of many potential buyers around the world."

    The Su-35, of course, is an excellent aircraft, but I have not yet realized what it showed in Syria in terms of "efficiency"? Or is it expressed in the fact that he, without fighting, has already scared everyone? smile
    1. yuriy55
      yuriy55 29 February 2016 16: 08
      +5
      Quote: Vladimirets
      ... that he, without fighting, has already scared everyone?


      This can be described in detail by Turkish and Saudi pilots ... why did they stop flying to Syria? ... crying
    2. Scoun
      Scoun 29 February 2016 17: 59
      +1
      Quote: Vladimirets
      The Su-35, of course, is an excellent aircraft, but I have not yet realized what it showed in Syria in terms of "efficiency"?

      Well, even a German general spoke out actually.
      German Tornado reconnaissance aircraft in the sky over Syria “are never alone” and are constantly accompanied by Russian Su-35 fighters. According to the Daily Sabah, German Lieutenant General Joachim Wundrack said in an interview with the Rheinische Post.

      According to Wundrack, with its “persecution”, Russia makes it clear that it acts in Syria as a “guest / ally of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad,” the article says.

      However, Wundrak also noted that no incidents had yet occurred and that Russian fighters did not try to force German planes out of Syrian airspace.
    3. GSH-18
      GSH-18 29 February 2016 21: 42
      0
      Quote: Vladimirets
      Or is it expressed in the fact that he, without fighting, has already scared everyone? smile

      But why? There was an incident when the gallant Israeli pilots unexpectedly discovered that they had been targeted by the Su-thirty-fifth. After that, they bravely and dashingly and with maximum speed turned around and draped where the eyes looked, the current would be far from this Drying! This is not a joke - a documented fact! Apparently they are afraid of electronic warfare systems. They can fall like flies from the sky without any missiles. So it goes request
  4. yuriy55
    yuriy55 29 February 2016 16: 05
    +7
    All this is great. If over time you have to make the TOP-10 Russian weapons in Syria, we will not be offended. If only our children and the Syrian militia would have been more convenient to beat Igilov’s evil spirits and their sponsors ... good
  5. le-s-ha
    le-s-ha 29 February 2016 16: 08
    +6
    In the West they like to make ratings at a time when the Russian aerospace forces are nightmare for barmaley.
  6. sever.56
    sever.56 29 February 2016 16: 08
    28
    http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2016/913/duiu352.png
    1. Tibidokh
      Tibidokh 29 February 2016 17: 35
      +3
      Quote: sever.56
      MOBILE SOLARIUM

      Beauty requires sacrifice! Victims of moderate terrorists.
  7. Spartanez300
    Spartanez300 29 February 2016 16: 09
    +6
    I would put in the first place: su-24, su-25, and su-34, these are the true hard workers of this conflict.
    1. le-s-ha
      le-s-ha 29 February 2016 16: 23
      +4
      I think that the first place should be given to the Syrian soldier defending his homeland, despite the fact that the entire "civilized" world has taken up arms against him. Well, since article about Russian weapons, then let the first place be for the AK in the hands of the Syrian Soldier
      1. GSH-18
        GSH-18 29 February 2016 21: 49
        0
        Quote: le-s-ha
        Well, because article about Russian weapons, then let the first place be for AK in the hands of the Syrian Soldier

        A Syrian soldier with a Russian AK defends his land there against terror terrorists, and our pilots there protect us from the same terror attacks. So here we are talking about us and our fighters and our weapons!
  8. Great-grandfather of Zeus
    Great-grandfather of Zeus 29 February 2016 16: 09
    +3
    Let’s better immediately top 20 of our tanks, and Kalashnikovs, and RPG7, ...
  9. Orphan 78
    Orphan 78 29 February 2016 16: 11
    +4
    But what about Kraukha-4 and the bubble over Syria? forgot what?
    1. GSH-18
      GSH-18 29 February 2016 21: 52
      0
      Quote: Orphan 78
      But what about Kraukha-4 and the bubble over Syria? forgot what?

      Yes, this is a really powerful gizmo. Apparently Sputnik is not up to date request
  10. Ros 56
    Ros 56 29 February 2016 16: 12
    +5
    This is normal for us, plowing some, rewarding others. It's like a revolution, think of romantics, fanatics, etc. True, it is impossible to say that the ones you listed are so forgotten, they are in the first places in almost every report from Syria, and who we almost forgot, these are our turntables, although they primarily support the infantry.
  11. Pereira
    Pereira 29 February 2016 16: 17
    +4
    What kind of agency is this?
    I have not heard anything about him.
    Anyone in the know?

    Found only this:

    The International News Agency (MIA) “Russia Today” launched the Sputnik brand. It will become a news agency for a foreign audience. We will maintain good relations with everyone, ”Dmitry Kiselev, director of the Russia Today news agency.

    I trust Vestnik Mordovia. The people there are very literate, the analysis is highly qualified. I read it periodically.
    And who are we discussing?
    1. Igor V
      Igor V 29 February 2016 18: 53
      +1
      In the past era, the Novosti Press Agency (APN) published a "digest of the Soviet press and literature" - the Sputnik magazine. The magazine was very interesting, as it reprinted the most interesting that was published in the country in a month. It was published in different languages ​​and distributed all over the world, except, unfortunately, the USSR. Those who worked abroad remember the vivid photos of the magazine. Most likely it is this brand that they are trying to revive.
  12. Gray 43
    Gray 43 29 February 2016 16: 17
    +2
    I would also include small arms in the rating, because infantry gain victory
    1. sharp-lad
      sharp-lad 1 March 2016 00: 10
      0
      In the current conditions, the infantry does not gain victory, but puts a big fat point in the war. hi Let the powerful and numerous equipment get victory, and not the soldiers pave the way for it with their bodies!
  13. Mama_Cholli
    Mama_Cholli 29 February 2016 16: 18
    +8
    And in Turkey, Russia used the most destructive weapons - the lack of reserved beds - places in hotels.
    1000 hotels were completely destroyed in one gulp.
    1. sharp-lad
      sharp-lad 1 March 2016 00: 12
      0
      And the second, volley, showed that the first volley is not everything Russia is capable of. hi !
    2. The comment was deleted.
  14. AIR-ZNAK
    AIR-ZNAK 29 February 2016 16: 21
    +2
    Quote: Ros 56
    This is normal for us, plowing some, rewarding others. It's like a revolution, think of romantics, fanatics, etc. True, it is impossible to say that the ones you listed are so forgotten, they are in the first places in almost every report from Syria, and who we almost forgot, these are our turntables, although they primarily support the infantry.

    They used to say so ** First, the hype, then the confusion, then the punishment of the innocent and then the rewarding of the uninvited **
  15. kepmor
    kepmor 29 February 2016 16: 23
    +3
    And I would put our military soldiers and officers in the first place!
    This is the most important and most powerful "weapon" of our army and navy!
    No other army in the world has such a "unique weapon"! So all other armies-fall-push out!
  16. raid14
    raid14 29 February 2016 16: 29
    +3
    When compiling the rating of Russian weapons in Syria, they forgot to interview the barmalei, oh they would tell.
    1. tiredwithall
      tiredwithall 29 February 2016 16: 40
      +2
      Absolutely incorrect formulation of the question - with the effective use of weapons, the interrogation of destroyed is possible only with the help of psychics.
  17. Greyjojo
    Greyjojo 29 February 2016 16: 35
    +2
    “Tu-160, as a rule, is perceived as a deterrent delivery system for nuclear weapons capable of covering a distance of up to 14000 km without refueling. However, in Syria, these aircraft destroyed a number of IS targets with conventional ammunition, such as the KAB-500 guided bombs. "
    Shta ??? and how long have the KAB-160 been installed on the Tu-500?
    what did the smokers smoke?
    1. cucujamba
      cucujamba 29 February 2016 17: 40
      +1
      Well, experts are 160th and 22nd wassat
      1. Karabin
        Karabin 29 February 2016 18: 41
        0
        Quote: cucujamba
        Well, experts are 160th and 22nd

        This is the difference between propagandists and propagandists.
  18. tiredwithall
    tiredwithall 29 February 2016 16: 43
    +3
    There they are at war, but here the ratings are tinder. Greatly helps the Syrians - "like a cough."
  19. Landwarrior
    Landwarrior 29 February 2016 17: 04
    +2
    Well, at least not "Bulletin of Mordovia" wassat
  20. hobot
    hobot 29 February 2016 19: 52
    +1
    Vague doubts torment me that the PAK FA will have to test in Syria in combat conditions.
    1. Ros 56
      Ros 56 29 February 2016 21: 28
      +1
      But where it is necessary to experience the same, it’s better there, our people are respected there.
  21. BARKHAN
    BARKHAN 29 February 2016 21: 46
    +2
    But I really liked the use of "Serpent Gorynych" UR 77.
    Probably, too, there is no one to write reports on behalf of the broads ...
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. sharp-lad
      sharp-lad 1 March 2016 00: 19
      0
      Cunningly! But let's hope that there were no women and children in the building.
  22. Shuhrat
    Shuhrat 1 March 2016 08: 48
    0
    Quote: Stirbjorn
    But the SU-35 fighter was hit) the bearded aircraft do not have how to evaluate its combat effectiveness

    The more screams of the enemy the more effective weapons, given that only his appearance shocked the patrons of bearded men, then it is twice as effective