In Russia, the degree of grief and horror is understood as nowhere else. The memories of the deaths of children in Beslan, the seizure of the hospital in Budennovsk, the explosions of the houses of Kreshka’s peacefully sleeping, and the despair of Nord-Ost are too vivid. And that is why Moscow today is at the forefront of the fight against ISIS, Djibgat al-Nusra and other international terrorist organizations.
But the West, and indeed a significant part of the countries of the Near and Middle East, shy away from taking effective measures to curb terrorist international, even from serious discussion about the need to consolidate efforts in the fight against this universal evil. But it is necessary to speak, because tragedies of this scale should not be repeated, and the survivors simply have to comprehend the reasons for what happened, if they lacked the intelligence and the will to prevent it.
The fact that Europe will face terrorist attacks, said long ago. They just could not happen. Not necessarily in Paris, not necessarily on Friday 13, and not necessarily in such a scenario. But on the day when, under the dictation of the United States, the first European politician blessed the Islamization of the Middle East, the death of innocent Europeans was predetermined.
Recall the recent history. For the first time, Islamic terrorism as a weapon of geopolitical struggle was used in Afghanistan against the USSR. The apostle of American geopolitics, Z. Brzezinski, openly acknowledged the participation of the United States in the creation of the Taliban, without any regrets about their deeds: “What is most important for the history of the world? Creating a Taliban or the collapse of the Soviet empire? Some kind of agitated Muslims or the liberation of the countries of Central Europe and the end of the Cold War? ”
The then efforts “to raise the USSR’s international price for its actions” strikingly recall today's attempts to “punish Russia”. History repeats itself.
As was to be expected, Islamism developed by the CIA in Afghanistan became the basis for all subsequent terrorist groups, including Al-Qaida and the ISIL spun off from it, which turned against the creators themselves. It was the Islamic State militants who claimed responsibility for the Friday tragedy - the death of a hundred and fifty people, proclaiming in an official statement: "Let France and those who follow its path know that they remain the main goal of the Islamic State, and the smell death will never leave their noses, as they head the column of crusaders, they dared curse our Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, and are proud to fight Islam in France, from planes strike Muslims on the land of the Caliphate . But the planes did not help them on the streets of Paris and its rotten alleys. This attack is the first of the storm. This is a warning to those who want to learn. ”
For a long time, France, which, thanks to General de Gaulle, was only partially a member of NATO, having left the military component, managed to distance itself from the overt support for Islamic terrorism. Everything has changed since President N. Sarkozy came to power, having restored full cooperation with NATO and announced a “reset” of relations with Washington. Striving for leadership in the EU, Sarkozy activated the Mediterranean-Middle East vector of the country's foreign policy. The result was a series of coups d'etat carried out with the active support of Paris in the countries of North Africa and the Middle East. It was France that inflicted the first aviation attacks on Libya, which marked the beginning of a long civil war in this country. Paris also played an active role in the civil war in Syria, for which the terrorist attacks of November 14 became revenge.
As French commentator T. Meisan writes, “Nicolas Sarkozy ... conducted negotiations with the United States and the United Kingdom on the restructuring of the Greater Middle East 2009-2010. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton urges him to launch a Franco-British colonial project under the leadership of the United States. 2 November 2010, that is, before the beginning of the “Arab Spring”, France and the United Kingdom sign a series of documents known collectively as the Lancaster Agreements. If in the open part it was said that both states would share their forces stationed abroad, that is, the occupying troops, then in the closed part it was planned to attack 21 March 2011 in Syria. It is known that Libya would be attacked by France two days later, will cause the wrath of the United Kingdom, outraged by the fact that the ally beat him. There will be no attack on Syria only because its customer, that is, the United States, changed its mind. ”
The US refusal of military intervention in Syria did not stop France, which created the "Free Syrian Army", the first members of which were militants from the Lebanese al-Qaida. Subsequently, France and Britain shipped to Syrian militants weaponsin spite of the protests of EU partners. And for the political support of the Islamists, with the active support of France, the Friends of Syria group was created. As you know, subsequently a large number of “moderate” militants joined the ISIS, which is now killing peaceful Parisians in the French capital. Did not accidentally be among the terrorists of the militant prepared by the French legionnaires?
Replacing N. Sarkozy as president, F. Hollande fully continued the policy of his predecessor. Paris still insists on the removal of B. Assad from power, in particular, setting a negotiation with Russia on the antiterrorist struggle against ISIL as a condition for forming a coalition government in Damascus.
Boomerang is sure to come back. Sowing the wind of the "Islamic revolution" Paris is now reaping a storm in the form of street riots, arson cars, the flow of refugees and terrorist acts.
The prophetic words of the late M. Gaddafi are involuntarily remembered: “Now listen to you, people from NATO! You bomb the wall that did not allow the flow of African migration to Europe, the wall that stopped the Al Qaeda terrorists. This wall was Libya. You destroy it. You are idiots. For thousands of migrants from Africa, for the support of "Al-Qaeda" burn you in hell. And so it will be. I never lie. I do not lie now. ” Approximately the same can be said about Syria. Having become unfit for habitation, including the efforts of Paris, this country throws out into Europe crowds of embittered, destitute and eager for revenge for all the humiliation and their ruined lives.
They know perfectly well the perpetrators of their broken fate. As the Russian journalist D. Aslamov was told by a Libyan doctor by the name of Ahmad, “it was France and Great Britain that bombed my country ... They will not be able to escape punishment. NATO has blooded the entire Middle East, and now the weak Europe, which has given power to itself to the American Satan, will be destroyed. Our women give birth to children. After five years, the face of Europe will completely change. I am not happy about it. I respect the great European culture and I don’t want minarets standing here instead of churches. But it will be so. This is retribution. ” At the same time, not everyone sees “retribution” in their own fertility and high social benefits.
According to Lebanese Education Minister Elias Bow Saab, among the 1,1 million refugees who flooded Europe, tens of thousands of IS militants are hiding. The IG itself gives more modest numbers in 4 th. Militants. But this is more than enough, given that the entire 8 people made a huge European metropolis completely helpless.
The monstrous sacrifices testify to the complete failure of the European policy of so-called multiculturalism, when in one country they are trying to unite representatives of traditional Muslim society and carriers of new “European values” in the form of crying cynicism, perversions and trampling of shrines. It is not excluded that the Bataklan club, where terrorists shot about 150 and wounded another hundred people, suffered because of the “Jesuis Charlie” sign located above the entrance to the institution and signifying the support of a satirical weekly club with cynical cartoons, including Prophet Mohammed.
The brutal lesson presented by Islamist fanatics to scum of the tabloid rag, when in January of this year a raid was arranged on the editorial board, as a result of which 12 people died, obviously didn’t go on, either to the journalists or to the French. Having published a new series of caricatures of the Prophet Mohammed, ridiculing the tragedy with the Russian plane, the editorial board of Charlie Hebdo intends to explode about the death of compatriots. One of the chief editors, J. Briard, said that the weekly was about to create a series of cartoons on the subject of recent terrorist attacks, which, according to the editor, would increase the circulation of the publication. It is curious how the French will understand this indescribable regulatory vocabulary, hitherto “not noticing” neither the victims in the Donbas, nor the bullying of the feelings of Muslims, nor the mockery of the memory of the victims of the recent catastrophe of the Russian plane in Egypt? Do they just giggle the same way as before?
No matter how cruel this truth is, the death of the innocent inhabitants of Paris was a direct consequence of the arrogant colonization policy of the West as a whole, and of a country that is not just an ally of the United States, but also an active destabilizer of the Arab world. Easily destroying the statehood of Libya, Syria, Ukraine, Tunisia and Egypt, Europe did not assume that war could come to the streets of its cities. Evidence of this is the complete lack of readiness of the French special services to repel terrorist attacks. According to the president of the International Counter-Terrorism Training Association, I. Linder, who believes that “these attacks were planned several years ago, and the recent attack on the editorial board of Charlie Hebdo was a general training session,” French security officials needed to draw the appropriate conclusions. The conclusions were clearly not made, given that the terrorists not only managed to carry out their plan, but also continue to shoot the hostages during the assault.
The Paris tragedy clearly showed that the war on terror had entered a hot phase. The shootings and bombings in Paris are of the same order as the recent bombings in Lebanon and the crash of a Russian airliner. Nevertheless, France clearly continues the game of geopolitical competition by introducing an aircraft carrier into the waters of the Mediterranean as part of a coalition operating under the auspices of the United States. And Turkey, and at all offers Western partners to recognize LIH, opening its diplomatic representation on its territory. As stated by the head of the Turkish foreign intelligence service MIT, H. Fidan, “The Islamic state is a reality. We must admit that we cannot eradicate such a well-organized and popular education as the “Islamic State”. Therefore, I urge our Western partners to revise their previous ideas about the political trends in Islam, set aside their cynical mindset and together frustrated Vladimir Putin’s plans to suppress the Islamic revolution in Syria. ”
I don’t want it, but you’ll do it: maybe terrorists also give out milk for harm? That there were forces to blow up the European cities and the Russian planes. How could such a proposal have been heard at all? But if not the last people in the power of Ankara broadcast it, it means that they were ready to listen. And this is very significant.
Perhaps, even if this terrible tragedy will make Europe understand that it is possible to defeat terror and protect the lives of its citizens only by joining forces. Including in the first place - with Russia. And for this you just need to stop being Charly and realize that the life of Syrians, Libyans, Ukrainians, Russians, Tunisians, Yemenis is no less valuable than the lives of Parisians.
There is no need to burn refugee camps and mosques, as the furious French suggest. It is enough just to stop, in order to please the geopolitical ambitions of its leaders, to destroy foreign states. And the money that Europe is now spending on the war and the resettlement of refugees is enough to restore the Middle East and North Africa.