To be honest, the political maturity of Russian society pleasantly surprised me. It would seem, where did she come from? In the USSR, the critical perception of political concepts was not taught, and hostile propaganda was simply jammed. In the dashing nineties it was not up to politics - the people survived. Well, since the beginning of 2000, the “patriotic” branch of the future swamp opposition has already earned, actively formulating the position of distrust of the current government as “fully under the control of the United States”, acting only at the behest of Washington and overthrowing itself.
Moreover, in strict accordance with the wording of Stalin's justice, over which the liberal party had once mocked, the anti-Putin opposition turned out to be left-right. The fascist Orthodox monarchists who hate the Bolsheviks do not tell the people about their desire to restore the autocratic monarchy and do not utter the word "catechon" felt from the stands. The mystical and eschatological concepts of white and brown are left for kitchen conversations among their own. Quite socialist and even communist slogans are issued to the public, providing for deoligarchization of power, nationalization of property, social justice and other minor pleasures, for the sake of preventing the introduction of which the predecessors of modern “saviors of Russia”: Krasnov, Shkuro, Vlasov - fought the Bolsheviks without sparing their lives.
Left radicals, just like their Trotskyist historical the predecessors are also ready to sacrifice principles and unite with nationalists and outright Nazis in the “struggle against the regime”, complementing social slogans with national ones and becoming outright Nazis.
Here's what else the public wants? Here you and crying about the unfortunate "Russian people" (within the boundaries of the principality of the Moscow era of Ivan Kalita), forced to share power over God with this power with all sorts of foreigners (so what, that the latter live on their lands?), And the requirement to take everything away and divide , and the promise that with the new "honest" power, "every cook" will rule the state. And the people do not support their saviors.
Anti-Putin politicians lose voters, experts - the audience, journalists, writers, bloggers - readers. The more they are marginalized, the more hysterical, inadequate and just become ridiculous. All the more former comrades and fellow travelers leave their ranks, "seeing out" and trying to quickly wash off. After all, the capitalization of a politician, like the capitalization of a publicist, depends on how much he is demanded by the masses (voters or readers). If he is only interested in his own reflection in the mirror or a small group of professional admirers of the next guru, then the funding of political activity stops.
Meanwhile, no matter how much activists and writers tell you about their honesty, self-sufficiency and contempt for material values, not a single person engaged in politics can do without attracted funds.
Consider two cases.
The first. If you work in the information space, then the more high-quality content you create, the stronger the effect on the masses. Therefore, provided that you are a talented information specialist, a rational decision will be to free you from the struggle for your daily bread, so that you can give away every free minute to information work. The same applies to expert and political technology activities. It is foolish to demand that a person earn money for bread in a stoker, and in his spare time he would shoot talented political videos or documentaries or consult a presidential candidate, governors, deputies.
Moreover, since all these are public people, employers are interested in paying very well. And not out of fear of being bought up. Just a public person, radiating well-being and prosperity, is already outwardly agitating for the concept being voiced. He seems to be saying: “Look at me. I adhere to such political views and see how prosperous I am. Follow my path and you will be fine too. ” So just recently, we propagandized the Western way of life. Euro-apartments, European-quality repairs, Euro-holidays, Euro furniture - in general, listen to European gurus and you will have everything in Europe. And after all, some are still under the hypnosis of the “modest charm of the bourgeoisie,” despite the fact that eurogold has long crumbled, and the dilapidated building of the “common European home” is gradually turning into a camp of Asian-African immigrants.
Second. You are a politician. An honest politician who cares only about the interests of the people. You need to inform voters about your ideas, provide feedback to them (as you would otherwise recognize the “interests of the people”, which may be diametrically opposed in Vladikavkaz and Vladivostok). To do this, it is necessary to have an extensive structure in the field (in fact, to create a party). It is better to hire competent and reputable people to work in each individual region, and such people are expensive. If you rely on the enthusiasm of volunteers, then sooner or later (but sooner rather than later) family and professional interests will cross the path of their social activism. Few are crazy, capable of leaving the family without a piece of bread for the sake of the idea of universal welfare and working for free in the hope of a "bright future for all mankind." Moreover, such people are dangerous because they consider the sacrifices they personally suffered as sufficient reason to drive humanity into happiness with an iron hand, with the help of mass repressions.
That is, for the successful implementation of your political concepts you have two options: attracting sufficient funds for effective agitation and propaganda; power coup. And the latter is no longer possible in the format of a revolution, because for the revolution mass support is needed, and for it money. Consequently, you will bet on the top coup, which can provide some unhappy security forces or people in senior government positions. At the same time, the negative experience of the Emergency Committee and the positive Yeltsin dispersal of the Supreme Council show that in any case, you will need a power component, and weapon, to ensure success, it will be necessary to apply without hesitation, and the entire spectrum (including Tanks и Aviation).
The last tantrums remaining on the front of the struggle against “anti-people power” are quite ripe for understanding (or intuitive perception) of their last chance to survive in politics. On the one hand, they have gone too far in anti-Putin propaganda and can no longer “see the light” and “realize”. The masses that have left them will not return them, but they will at least somehow embarrass their vanity and ensure the minimal capitalization of the gaggle of their last fanatical followers. On the other hand, they cannot call the people to revolt against Putin (Putin will have to save them from the people).
Therefore, recently they have modernized their publicistic concept. This is the third option. The first read: “Dashing boyars are draining the Donbass, but near the hope-sovereign there are honest people who are about to bring the voice of the people to him. After that, the dashing boyars will be dispersed, those who are worthy of the townspeople and foreigners will be appointed duma clerks and Russia will spread from pole to pole and from Lisbon to Tegucigalpa. ” However, in spite of the massive information attack on the “dashing boyars”, Putin did not, to the delight of the enemy, disperse his own environment and recruit qualified leaders for the supporters of the slogan “Everything and Immediately!”
The second option explained the failure of the first: “The king was not real. Dashing boyars and foreign guests are holding him by the efimka in the Swiss and Aglitsa banks, because the power must be changed as soon as possible, until the whole of Russia is sold to the adversaries. ” This option turned out to be even more disastrous, because if Putin was to be helped against the bad boyars, at the call of some gurus (supposedly conveying the will of the Kremlin), the people were ready, after it became clear that the gurus with the Kremlin and others were not lying around, there was interest in them instantly lost
Having discovered a massive outflow of readers, admirers and voters, right-left monarchist fascists proposed a third concept, which should return them to the audience. Now they claim that they do not oppose the government, but only criticize it for omissions. We use, they say, freedom of speech, we point the authorities to mistakes, so that it is even better. At the same time, we inform the people about the mistakes, so that they, too, in case of the authorities, indicate. Well, that the Russian reality in the image of conscientious critics looks like a war of Somali and Chadian tribes in the garbage in the conditions of the Far North - the cost of production. They "see it that way." They are not varnishes you of reality, but an honest (albeit crooked) mirror.
But the third option will fail, as the first two failed, and the fourth will fail, and the fifth. And it will happen for one simple reason. In the same way as their Ukrainian Maidan colleagues, our “whistleblowers” and “snatches of covers” (for nothing, some of them are active “fighters with the junta”, which does not prevent them from being friends, and even sixes, activists of the Maidan and founders of the UNSO) are people intellectually insufficient.
The vast majority of whistleblower publicists do not create their own texts, but comment on the texts of political opponents. And, thus, popularize not so much the, how many our concepts. After all, they are forced to refer to texts and authors who are criticized or at least call them and quote from there. And the person is so constituted that he wishes himself, to feel with his own hands everything about what he is being told, even if they say nasty things and horrors. And so, all the adequate readers of the red-and-white monarchist-fascist gurus, gaining access to the alternative point of view and being able to compare it with the arguments of their “sovereign thinkers”, which boil down to curses, defamation attempts or the simple statement “this is not true, because I don’t I think, "they are leaving anti-Putin propagandists, reducing their social weight and political capitalization.
But the greatest harm to Putin’s opponents is inflicted by the former icon of reconstruction style, and now abandoned even by former sincere adepts Igor Ivanovich. He was no longer perceived as a potential leader of the “united patriotic” Trotsky-Black-Hundred opposition, but he is still willingly quoted by the secondary and pro-Ukrainian media. Therefore, his pearls, unintentionally (unwisely) exposing the goals and objectives of Neo-anti-Yugoslav propaganda diverge much more widely than the explanations and explanations of petty gurus, each of whom spud from 4-x to 40-sectarians.
Once he began to work in style: throw down his mistakes on opponents and attribute their plans to them, Igor Ivanovich continues to follow him as senselessly and mercilessly as they walked along the Kuban steppe from Rostov-on-Don to Ekaterinodar. Last week, he immediately pleased with two revelations. First, Surkov prepares (with the help of Beard) militants for Manezhki, in order to merge them. In general, Putin's assistant is preparing an armed coup against Putin, then to suppress him to the glory of Putin.
Secondly, Russia is ineffective in the fight against LIH. Ahead of the “second Afghanistan”, the drain of Donbass, popular discontent and the collapse of the “regime”, which the disgruntled masses will sweep away.
We will not consider the realisticness of the Syrian forecast, so far, apart from Igor Ivanovich and a few units of Trotsky-Black-Hundred bloggers on external financing, such an outcome to anyone (including American, European and Israeli special services) does not seem likely. Every next statement by Igor Ivanovich is interesting to me exclusively from the psychological point of view. In the end, he is an extremely ambitious person and what is called a straight line (not to be confused with honest, although internally he is probably honest, that is, he says what he believes in, even if it has nothing to do with reality). Moreover, thanks to the numerous uncontrollable relations of the Trotsky-Black-Hundred parties, he is aware of the prevailing political concepts and tendencies in this environment. Well, in his old habit of public relations he tries to be the first to voice what he knows about, just as he feeds the remaining few supporters with “exclusive” information from the Kremlin, Kiev and the White House (he has informants everywhere).
What do Strelkov's revelations tell us? Except, of course, that he didn’t forgive Surkov for the missed episodes of Generalissimo DNR, and Boroday for the fact that he managed (unlike Igor Ivanovich himself) to create a working structure that united the Donbas militias and ensured their socialization.
And they say the following.
Firstly, the Donbass militia was planned and planned to be used in the Aniputinian coup (for this, however, they must be pulled out from under the influence of the hated Beard, but Igor Ivanovich has no doubts in his charisma).
Secondly, the ideological rationale for the coup will be based on the fact that the Russian government lost the US campaign in Syria and Donbas. For this, the Trotsky-Black-Hundred conspirators need to delay the Syrian campaign, the loss of Russian aviation, it is desirable to engage in the battles of the land contingent of the Russian Federation, which, due to the specifics of the land war, will inevitably suffer more significant losses. Here, our "patriots" are allies of the United States and LIH.
Thirdly, against this background, unrest in the Donbas and the shaking of local leadership are needed. The first attempts are made with the help of fluent Ukrainian oligarchs (this is the next article). Even if the internal problems of Donbass fail to be presented as a full-fledged "plum", it will be possible to say that Surkov and Putin are a little short of Donbass again, thanks to the vigilance of the "patriots". Here the Trotsky-Black Hundreds are allies of the Kiev regime and runaway oligarchs from Yanukovych’s entourage, who dream of building the same power system in Russia as they were in Ukraine. Moreover, here you can rob for a very long time, although I am afraid that these guys would have coped quickly and with the same result. Well, the US have their interest.
Fourthly, with the help of massive propaganda (referred to as “constructive criticism of regime mistakes”), an attempt will be made to bring the most active and patriotic sections of Moscow society to the streets, and under their cover to ensure the actions of armed militants, both from among former militias and neo-Nazi pseudo-Russian organizations. By the way, Surkov was accused of preparing them in advance so that the organizers of the putsch could then shout, “We warned!”
At this stage, our narrow-minded right-left monarchist fascists are counting on the victory of the “patriotic Maidan”, and their more adequate American curators simply hope that the Trotsky-Black Hundreds have enough strength to prolong the bloody orgy in the capital for a period of three days to a week and kill from several hundred to several thousand people. Accordingly, the “civilized world” will have time not only to express, but also widely publicize its concern with “bloody repressions” with the help of which the “regime that has lost its legitimacy” is kept in power.
And this is not a trifle, because it is in this way - by demonstrating the “bloody suppressed uprising in the capital”, we can convince our real and potential allies of the internal weakness of the Russian authorities, the inevitability of its collapse, and thus devalue all the work of Russian diplomacy and military and all the victims of citizens Russia and Russian Ukraine and Donbass, brought in recent years to the altar of common victory.
In general, I wrote a year ago that from the point of view of the geopolitical alignment of forces, Russia's victory is inevitable. But, as in 1917, it can get us out of our nose with the help of the fifth column. By the way, in 1917, the fifth column, which ensured the February coup, was also multifaceted and diverse, and included socialists, liberals, democrats, constitutional monarchists, and supporters of unlimited autocracy, and even the Black Hundreds. And they all "criticized the authorities" for minor omissions with the goal of improvement. And the Bolsheviks, they appeared in April, and took power in October. Major events without them occurred.
So the last and most important line of Russian defense is against the “foe-in-arms”. And do not reassure yourself that he is weak, stupid and marginalized. And on the example of the death of the Romanov monarchy, and on the example of the collapse of the USSR, we could see that in the minimally favorable conditions the heads of this hydra begin to grow and multiply with the speed of rabbits colonizing Australia. Moreover, in the adventures of the fifth column, uncomplicated and innocent people perish, and justice requires that normal people live normally, and political provocateurs would throw out their energy on construction sites of the national economy, preferably in high latitudes.