On the strategy of the West towards Russia


The Russian Empire, the Soviet Union and the Russian Empire for the West, and in the 20th and early XXI centuries, first and foremost for the USA were and are the number one enemy on the planet. It is clear that after 1991, it was not customary to talk about this openly, and in 90, Russia lost part of its sovereignty.


But, the situation has not fundamentally changed, the danger to the Western world has remained due to the presence of the Russian people themselves, which are still among the ten largest nations of the planet. The existence of the entire spectrum of nuclear weapons in the Russian Federation: from tactical to strategic charges, and the entire high-grade triad of nuclear weapons carriers - underwater fleetstrategic aviation, land-based ICBMs. The West is threatened by a relatively high level of education and culture of Russian citizens, the remnants of Soviet science and military-industrial potential, based on which one can restore the position of a superpower. And the example of the Stalinist USSR shows that, if necessary, our people can transform the country in the shortest possible time.

After the collapse of the USSR, the Anglo-Saxons held to the medium-term strategy of "strangulation" of Russia. It included a whole range of activities, but there are three main elements. First, it is to keep the Russian political elite on a short leash, to tame her to the complete abandonment of national interests. For this, they turned a blind eye to corruption, foreign accounts, and the purchase of real estate, although from time to time they were reminded that they could send “from Canar to prison” at any moment. They introduced their agents of influence, following the example of Trotsky-Bronstein after the 1917 revolution of the year. Among the most obvious such agents are Nemtsov, Chubais, Kasyanov, Kudrin, etc.

Secondly, the blow was struck on the industrial, military, scientific, educational potentials of Russia. Mostly with the help of the fifth column and various non-governmental organizations, private firms and individuals, such as the actions of Soros and his foundations. As a result, Russia should have lost the ability to produce nuclear weapon and the main types of advanced weapons (such as multifunctional fighters, submarines, including nuclear submarines, large ships, etc.). Her education and science should have completely degraded, the national economy should be guided only by the interests of the "pipe".

Thirdly, the Russian culture, which had already been undermined in the 1960-1980-s, becoming in many ways Russian-speaking, had to completely degenerate. The same technologies that had already been used were used, with the help of which the western average person was treated from the 1960-s, when Americans from the working people, engineer, were mostly turned into office plankton, “lawyers”, helpless hippies, other “non-formals” and perverts . The methods are very simple, some of Hitler and his ideologues talked about some - the sexual revolution (“sex”), the aggressive offensive “pop music” (“rock and roll”), the active introduction of all types of drug addiction (from the spiritual, like dozens of sects and " religions "before replanting dope - tobacco, alcohol, more destructive drugs). And the main blow was inflicted on the fragile childish, youth psyche.

At the pace of destruction that took place during the years of “perestroika” and “reform”, the results should have manifested themselves through 20-30. Moscow itself had to abandon the Soviet nuclear legacy, because it was impossible to reliably control it and change the old systems to new ones, or Russia's nuclear arsenal would gradually be simply “written off” due to death from old age. It should be noted that in the West, public figures and cinema supported this topic, regularly recalling the danger of the “atomic bomb” falling into the hands of “international terrorists”, i.e., preparing a scenario of transferring the Russian nuclear arsenal “posing a threat to all mankind” (USA).

These plans have not been forgotten either now, since the Institute for Contemporary Development (INSOR) in the spring of 2011 of the year in the report “Strategy-2012”, said that possessing the remnants of the nuclear potential causes serious harm to the modernization of the Russian Federation. According to experts of the institute, nuclear weapons are not only protection, but also the cross of Russia, they say, “fit to talk about the nuclear curse” of our country.

But to wait until Russia “itself” dies, it has become dangerous. Firstly, signs of a revival appeared in Russia, so the Military Industrial Complex, by reorienting to foreign markets, was able to retain part of the cadres, production. The nuclear industry, both peaceful and military, also did not die: Putin’s decision in 1999 in the year launched work on a new modification of the submarine ballistic missile (SLBM), which received the new designation Р-29РМУ 2 "Sineva". In the new version of the SLBM, the dimensions of the stages were somewhat changed, the rocket’s resistance to the effects of an electromagnetic pulse was increased, a new set of means to overcome the enemy’s missile defense and a satellite navigation system were installed. A project was launched to adopt the 8 Borey series submarine from the 955 submarine, one submarine Yury Dolgoruky is used for testing SLBMs, the second one is Alexander Nevsky at sea trials, a third nuclear submarine Vladimir Monomakh is being built. Russia has launched a serial production of Topol-M and PC-24 “Yars” ICBMs; new SLBMs “Liner” and “Bulava” are being tested. At the same time, the service life of the missiles adopted for service was extended back in the years of the USSR. There are plans to modernize the air component of the Russian nuclear forces and to create the Perspective Long-Range Aviation Complex (PAK DA). The contract for R & D on the creation of the PAK DA for the term of 3 was signed in August of 2009 between the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation and the company Tupolev.

Instead of destroyed, after the signing of the Treaty on the Elimination of Medium and Short-Range Missiles, with the United States in 1987, the Soviet operational tactical missile complex "Oka" and its modernization of the complex "Oka-U" was developed and adopted in 2006 in the service of Iskander "(He may be the carrier of tactical nuclear weapons). They are armed with the first military unit - the 26-I missile brigade ZVO (Luga).

A similar picture is observed in the area of ​​the Air Force, Navy, Armored Forces, etc. Moscow began to re-equip the army and navy. Positive developments can be noted in other areas, for example, in the field of integration with Belarus and Kazakhstan.

The second reason why the West (first of all, the Anglo-Saxons) can no longer wait is the global global crisis. This is a kind of "pusher" for Moscow, you cannot live peacefully, you have to either "die" or carry out modernization, new industrialization, rearmament of the armed forces. And the US needs global upheavals in Eurasia, which will lead to a world war, the only way to maintain its leadership, destroying all competitors, real and potential. Finally break the resistance on the planet and build a “New World Order”.

The main areas in which the Anglo-Saxons

This is the launch of the processes of disintegration, collapse, chaos throughout Eurasia - from Greece and Kosovo, Italy and Spain (a blow to the European Union and the euro zone), and the Arab unrest and the crisis situation in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Eurasia should blaze, the front is built along the North-South line. In this scenario, Russia should join in the war against the Islamic world (thank God, Moscow did not take part in the war against Libya), its fronts in this war are the Caucasus and Central Asia. Ideally, for Washington, if Russia still grapple with China. It is enough even not a big war, but a series of border conflicts from the Far East and Mongolia to Kazakhstan.

Anglo-Saxons forcing Russia to fight, at the same time exacerbate the internal crisis - the scenario of the First World War, the citizens of Russia will not be happy with the war, when men will fight in Tajikistan, or Kyrgyzstan, the majority of people will not understand the purpose of the war. So, it can be noted that in August 2008, many were outraged that Russian soldiers are protecting some "Caucasians" in the war with Georgia, they say, this is not our war. In addition, the war will lead to an increase in the number of people who can not only handle weapons, but also those who are ready to kill, with the February-2 scenario.

Inside the country, there is currently a close work with the protest electorate. The second term variant of Medvedev failed, so Putin’s “demonization” in the eyes of Western and Russian philistines is increasing. In the West, they are well aware that Russia is an imperial country, and the Russian people are the bearer of imperial ideology, therefore it is enough to shake the situation in Moscow. The regions, in a high degree of probability, will accept the new power without serious resistance.

In the battle will throw everyone from the liberal public and the "right things" to the nationalists and the Communist Party. Zyuganov has already been noted as the defender of the “Russian people” (recalling the “Russian question”), said that the upcoming elections will be “dirtier” than the previous ones. Moscow’s fiscal policy (including the rapid increase in defense spending), sent out by Kudrin, is criticizing Chubais’s “degradation of political life” in Russia. The Board of the Russian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs (RSPP) announced a political crisis in Russia and demanded political reforms.

One of the issues with which Russia is being swayed is a Caucasian problem. Moscow needs to increase attention to this problem, the antics of the so-called. “Black skinheads” should be harshly punished and punished, otherwise they can blow up the situation.

Therefore, there is a significant possibility that in December 2011 of the year, in the winter - in the spring of 2012, we will see in Moscow a “battle” for the future of Russia. If it fails to break the “Putin clique,” ​​then the West will increase external pressure — revolution and unrest in the South Caucasus, Central Asia (up to the war), in Ukraine.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

55 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. LESHA pancake
    LESHA pancake 28 October 2011 08: 57 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    MCCAIN VERY BRIGHTLY SHOWED THE STRATEGY OF THE WEST. And the ending is prepared for us in the likeness of carving in Libya.
  2. TAMERLAN
    TAMERLAN 28 October 2011 09: 24 New
    • 10
    • 0
    +10
    smart NATO countries will never go for it, because they understand that in the first place they will die and not the United States, which as a shield behind these countries
    1. His
      His 28 October 2011 16: 52 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Don’t tell me. Che in Washington say it will
      1. His
        His 28 October 2011 17: 32 New
        • -4
        • 0
        -4
        At INOSMI I read an original article in my genre, but I was pleasantly surprised: http://inosmi.ru/history/20111028/176735555.html
        I think that in some countries that we have already beaten, there is insight that we can add
  3. Anatoly
    Anatoly 28 October 2011 09: 33 New
    • -8
    • 0
    -8
    Wow! And Kudrin is now an enemy and a spy!
    even funny from the side. like a terrarium - snakes devour each other.
    And what a draft article! - Vovchik is our man! have to vote, otherwise Russia will not be reborn.
    1. Russian Man
      Russian Man 28 October 2011 13: 32 New
      • -19
      • 0
      -19
      Well, you see from the comments, the led hamsters caught the author’s appeal, they even busted you.
      Pitun !!! Pitun !!! Pitun !!!
  4. LESHA pancake
    LESHA pancake 28 October 2011 09: 38 New
    • -5
    • 0
    -5
    YES IT IS UNDERSTANDABLE WHY THIS ACCOUNTANT KUDRIN WRITTEN IN THE ARTICLE.
  5. Boos24
    Boos24 28 October 2011 10: 00 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    there is a lot of truth in the article, but with this sauce we are not allowed to understand that, the logics have few facts, too, but almost the entire government entered agents very beautifully, of course, throwing the correct piece of truth into the truth is not clear that they will be taken at face value against the truth, it’s worked 10 years ago but everyone understands everything
  6. svvaulsh
    svvaulsh 28 October 2011 10: 32 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Well, the brainstorming was successful. After reading, the bulk hangs and requires a reboot. I explain: the first half of the article is written in the spirit of terry communism smoothly goes into the enumeration of the current "successes", and in the end they make it clear that we need Putin! Article-changeling, a kind of wolf in sheep's clothing, or a trojan for the layman.
  7. Magadan 28 October 2011 10: 36 New
    • 12
    • 0
    +12
    There may well be agents in the government, but this is not particularly necessary. Real management, i.e. the implementation of decisions makes the "middle link" - that is, bureaucrats at the level of the chief gene. headquarters, governor, head of the local tax inspectorate, fish inspection, head of police, some deputy. Minister, etc. At this level, you can “hold onto” something, distort some actions, remove an objectionable person, cut loot, etc., the main thing is to come up with a plausible excuse. Here these vipers from the fifth column live.
    Carefully study the events in Sagra - from the arrest of the defenders of the village, to the pressing of journalists with the help of local cops and judges. Then the head of the investigation department from Moscow appears and arranges everything as it should: the cops were fired, the attackers were planted, they thanked the journalists and defenders. This is, alas, a rare case of victory over nits from the "middle link", there are much more defeats.
    The middle link is omnipotent, if it is properly organized. It can: easily sabotage any decisions by inventing an excuse, steal money, bribing the same policemen from the same "middle link", destroy the military-industrial complex for NATO money, because you can’t stupidly keep track of every order and every plant you weren’t a cool president. If the president starts stupidly chopping heads, then the heads will fly off at the good guys in the "middle link". Remember 1937? They say that it was a “brilliant Abwehr operation” that we were left without the best officers. The system is infected and it can only be healed by the population itself, speaking out against a specific bureaucrat and shouting about such a bureaucrat on every corner. I see no other options. An enemy works against us, which in our intrigues is much stronger and smarter than our fsbeshnikov.
    1. prunx
      prunx 28 October 2011 11: 29 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Well, if you remember the year 37, what kind of good guys were their heads turned off? About the Abwehr operation is also possible in more detail. A fan of Tukhachevsky?
      1. Magadan 29 October 2011 07: 50 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Not even a close fan of this dreamer of "radio-controlled boats." Only they did not plant alone the Tukhachevs. Rokossovsky also sat. Thank God not everyone was shot, and Thank God Zhukov pulled many from the Gulag. I don’t remember my last names, but aviation and sabotage troops especially got it. The creator of the tactics of partisan troops (I don’t remember the name) was shot, who said that the encircled army is not a crushed army, but a serious danger to the enemy rear. He developed a whole system of survival in the forest and methods of attacking supply columns to capture captured weapons. Together with him they planted a lot of specialists of such a war, because this was contrary to the cap-doctrine military doctrine.
    2. Aleksey42
      Aleksey42 29 October 2011 21: 23 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      I do not agree, first of all, the chief of the general staff or the governor is far from the average. I do not think that the President is not aware of the affairs of ministers and governors, in what houses they live and where their children study. Secondly, control can be organized in two ways (top and bottom). Control from above worked perfectly in the Soviet Union, when it was impossible to imagine such a scale of theft and "cuts". If we are trying to build a democratic state, then we need to establish control from below, that is, from ordinary citizens and, in particular, the press. But there are also difficulties, for example, a journalist may be “bought”. But I think there is no other option. As you know, we have one president, but there are many who want to steal. By the way, remember the fate of people who tried to convey the truth to the president. As a rule, they simply get fired from work and deal with the end.
    3. runway 29 October 2011 22: 54 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Magadan
      The fish has rotted, but its head is gone? Think original.
  8. Yves762 28 October 2011 10: 40 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    The truth is that the preservation, modernization, rise of Russia is possible only as a result of the dictatorship of the proletariat !!!!!!! Do not associate this statement with the current Communists, Zhirinovsky, GDP, or someone else from the current "elite" !!!!!
    1. Vasilenko Vladimir 1 November 2011 16: 03 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Yves762
      the rise of Russia is possible only as a result of the dictatorship of the proletariat !!!!!!!

      I mean, again, in the sense of taking and sharing, thank you, it’s enough that my great-grandfather shared, I won’t allow anyone to share, I’ll bite my teeth, as I didn’t steal and didn’t take it, but I earned it with a hump
    2. Don
      Don 1 November 2011 16: 23 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Again, you have to share everything, but to pick it up. For a start, you would have built something yourself, created it.
      1. oper66
        oper66 4 November 2011 22: 26 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        not to divide and select but it is necessary to return the looted property and funds of the privatized period of ebnschina
  9. VALENOK
    VALENOK 28 October 2011 10: 41 New
    • 12
    • 0
    +12
    The meaning of the article is understandable, Putin’s support, and there’s nothing to be ashamed of, remember at least in what condition he got the country when he came to power and imagine how much work it takes to raise the country's profile. If under Yeltsin Russia stood in the pose of a drinker from a stream
    1. Yves762 28 October 2011 10: 48 New
      • -3
      • 0
      -3
      The GDP in particular, and the EDORN as a whole (assuming the fact that they are ts for Russia, are patriotic) could not restore order even in their ranks, generally speaking about the country is dumb ... Why, in fact, perversions with the so-called "popular front, "if not for" holding pants "!?
      1. Vasilenko Vladimir 1 November 2011 16: 34 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        let me disagree again, it’s not the parties or rulers who are to blame for the majority, but you and I.
        I can give an example, they began to repair the bridge over the river, as usual the village and district authorities thought not only that they’re an ass, but I don’t even know how, in general, they dismantled the bridge, but it became impossible to get to the hay and grazing, as it were, On August the bridge should have been delivered.
        it’s like they started the construction and it seems like it’s enough for reference, but it turned out that the pat in the project was screwed up, there is not enough money and the bridge was frozen until May next year. since they promised by August to hand over the people’s equipment in a circular, 70 km, he overtook the hay, but they didn’t get 80 tons of hay, it was considered that Belarus would be transported by spring.
        the whole village sits, but doesn’t want to do anything or write a letter or take it to Kaliningrad.
        that I didn’t know that the bridge was being built 2 months later, I live on a farm 4 km from the village, wrote a letter, collected the signatures and sent it, within 2 weeks the question was resolved, the builder found (or rather forced to find) the money in a month, I hope the bridge is empty, and if the bazaar was further bred in the kitchens, then by May there would be no bridge.
        we don’t always bother to get the ass to the ballot boxes, but after that, EDRO
  10. Volkhov
    Volkhov 28 October 2011 10: 48 New
    • 10
    • 0
    +10
    Sovereignty is lost not partially, but completely, Russia is not the enemy, but the "penalty battalion" of the West, which is poked in all holes - financial, African ... suck out oil, gas, tanks, people and keep the money of the Russian Federation at home. A cargo donkey following a carrot is usually not considered an enemy if something yells. The missiles mentioned are controlled by the same West and are intended for its enemies, and personnel only provide storage and launch.
    The article creates a virtual world for the population, and soon it will have to act without guidance and it is time to gradually leave the Matrix.
    1. danilatrg 28 October 2011 11: 04 New
      • -6
      • 0
      -6
      You are in the service of the west, my friend.
      1. Volkhov
        Volkhov 28 October 2011 19: 46 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Read carefully - the West and the Russian Federation are the same, the party of power serves the West, I just remove the ads from the windshield so that at least the largest pits are visible. If you are surprised by the line about actions without leadership, it is they who are leaving: they are expanding Moscow over the tunnel to the airfield and erecting a fence around the "Old Square". Elections are a six-month undertaking, and then go on their own, and these are their actions, not mine.
        The environment from which they flee gives a random survival of the order of 0,0007, and with organized actions - 0,02 ... 0,05, so I serve people and write in Russian.
    2. Don
      Don 28 October 2011 14: 16 New
      • -2
      • 0
      -2
      What did you smoke, what are you talking about?
    3. ereke
      ereke 28 October 2011 21: 25 New
      • -2
      • 0
      -2
      I read here your comments and wonder where, how much anger the Russians have? from disorder or from dissatisfaction with their power?

      When the Union collapsed, the Russian Federation as a new territorial entity, and in fact a new state with a new system. experienced the same difficulties as other republics of the former union, (well, maybe some are bigger, but the RF is a rather big country in the world and there were more opportunities), but the collapse was unequivocal of the economy, relations in society, people were not paid wages for half a year, and that they did it in kind products. There was hopelessness. Say no, there were resources in the form of gas of oil and other minerals ... The answer is simple, the money from the sale went into the pockets of certain individuals represented by oligarchs (they would not be billionaires if they shared with the people) and still settled in the offices of various ministries in in the pockets of officials of various levels who also acted through front companies and sold not only resources but also what remained of the USSR’s inheritance, as it turned out, this popular good turned out to be a draw and quickly found new Khazyaevs in the face of these most nouveau riche new business sharks and then the proceeds were exported abroad in jn. banks and offshore zones.

      And what about the people? the Russian people and not only survived as best they could, the benefit was given freedom of action and all borders were open. It was then that shuttles from the people first poured and then firms, buying west, Dutch cheeses and sausages, from the distant sea, the ocean of Pindostan, chicken legs and cigarettes of companies such as Phillip Maurice poured in an uninterrupted stream, everyone lit up marlboro and winston and began to drink Pindosky can beer of different brands or the German "canvas" Even shuttle traders and private companies brought even simple asperin from Europe or America. Everyone began to ride on used foreign cars, the people survived and turned over, the money went in the form of the US currency, since the ruble was dying and then resurrected, but the result was the same inanimate and slow-moving, the exchanges earned in full. People have a lot of money. New businesses needed currency. Then the West began to provide loans to legal entities at European interest and not only second-tier banks but also large ones such as Deutsche Bank, Bank of New York, or even IBRD. The country came to life, used cars began to drive less and less from Europe and Pindostana. We opened local dealer networks selling new cool cars. Business is business, to the West it was all profitable to sell their goods, especially small companies. They even started writing in Russian on product labels.

      Russia survived the crisis and was able to stand on its own feet (I’m talking about the people). This situation suited the West, such Russia, not to mention other CIS countries, as well as Georgia and Ukraine. On the one hand, Western production is being realized and the economy is holding on to the West, on the other hand, the nouveau riche take out all the money earned in the "billions" also to the West and there they sell the extracted raw materials on exchanges. On the other hand, the people had nothing to buy another, the Soviet economy passed away and ordered to live long before death.

      America and the West did not intervene in the internal affairs of the Russian Federation in either the first Chechen or the second company (separate independent representatives and private organizations did not count) only the Islamists settled in Turkey and in the Arab countries helped. When did the second counter-terrorism war begin against Chechen fighters? The United States directly assured representatives of the Russian Federation that they would not support terrorists. Word kept. There was a case in the fall of 1999. The FBI found out that American citizens of Arab origin buy AIM-94 “stinger” MANPADS of the latest modifications through dummies and transfer emisaroam from Chechnya and “stinger” through a third country will enter the blazing Chechen republic. The FBI warned the FSB about this deal and detained arms dealers, then sent the FSB a message that the stingers would get into Chechnya through Georgia. And the employees, together with special forces, slammed the militants in the gorges of the border with Georgia along with the cargo (stingers). In general, the supplies fell off. But they could have done just like in Afghanistan when William Casey (director of the CIA in the 80s) said we would try to show your Vietnamese, and we definitely made things incredible, the Pakistani instructors trained entire detachments of mujahideen, trained them to equip, armed and more money was paid to them, that every year the USSR kept on increasing spending on Afghanistan, both financially and financially. But no, such Russia was settling them, it was not profitable for it to continue to prick itself up in separate republics. After all, these yesterday’s fighters, today for America and the West, are becoming uncontrollable and enemies, it’s far inexpedient to go for an example. Osama Bin Laden was raised by the amers themselves, having swallowed hundreds of millions of dollars in it in order for him to organize an elite White Stork detachment from among the Dushmans to act in the same Afghan against Soviet occupants. But those days were gone, the Soviet occupants did not, the West moved closer to the economic Russia, Osama became uncontrollable, for the reason that fanatics do not have brains in their heads but ideology, and for this ideology they can do everything and undermine themselves and other peaceful citizens somewhere in the mall or in the subway. By the way, they Amer recently recognized one leader of the Chechen Muslim army as a Terrorist and included them in the list of especially dangerous people, which means that wherever he may be subject to arrest or physical destruction if he is spotted of course ...

      So what do you Russians themselves want from them. Indeed, now they influence the world (I mean the USA and other NATO countries) and believe (by the right of strong economic and military) that they should bear responsibility for the world, so that there would be no chaos, so they think and do.

      What claims can be to them? if the Russian Federation is not able to solve anything on a global scale? If there is power, dare you no one will condemn you, if you can raise all this and the economy will withstand and be uplifting. And you will even gain allies and spheres of influence. And those who from the allies can retreat and punish and change the rulers of this country. HOW was in Czechoslovakia in 1968. When my father was a young reconnaissance officer from a reconnaissance battalion, a tank army stationed in Belarus, along with the entire battalion, was among the first to be transferred to the territory of Czechoslovakia at the end of July to defend the socialist conquest and establish pro-Western renegades, and they believed this themselves. And the west did not intervene. Why is it necessary to breathe poison constantly everywhere in all articles. Is it the envy of the cowardly? or what? can someone explain?
      1. ESCANDER
        ESCANDER 28 October 2011 22: 26 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        For your information:
        “Jealousy of the cowardly” - that is what he means to me, I will not disclose the WHOLE “black list”.
        1. Banshee 29 October 2011 02: 33 New
          • 7
          • 0
          +7
          I'll try ...

          It is not poison. And do not envy cowardly.

          This discussion and exchange of opinions of people who understand, on the one hand, that the situation needs to be changed, and on the other hand, does not yet know how. That's all. You should not mix the soft with the warm, and give each of the writers here the functions of a ruler.

          Dissatisfaction with the power takes place, and, alas, it is justified. Infuriates mostly people who understand that, to the great regret, there is nothing and no one to oppose the existing authorities. Crop failure was not grown. And to call on the kingdom of the Vikings ... not those times.

          "Everyone thinks he is a strategist, seeing the fight from the side." There is a saying. Everyone has their own war, their own trench. And, if a person doesn’t, if he doesn’t care, why doesn’t he express what is in his head? It is clear that the authorities do not come here, they do not need it. Well this is not Twitter ... But to express and be heard is the legal right of everyone who wants to do it.

          And the fact that poison breathes ... Well, you can go to the sites edrosov, there is no poison. Everything is in order there. It's just that there is another swamp and toads in their croaks. Not in unison with edrin. But again, it is not necessary to attribute the properties of all Russians to a single Internet society. Here is the part. Not the stupidest. Not the most pleased. Something like that.
          1. ESCANDER
            ESCANDER 29 October 2011 06: 20 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            You see, ereke, they answered you correctly and without insults.
            Learn.
          2. sirToad
            sirToad 29 October 2011 07: 52 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            common sense! neither diminish nor add! (especially about Toads)
          3. valerei 29 October 2011 23: 43 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            It is well written and, as I noticed, it is absolutely error-free. Nice to read.
    4. zczczc
      zczczc 29 October 2011 20: 18 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Volkhov, and where infa that our missiles are controlled by them?
      If so, then this is kapets, of course.

      By the way, why on Fr. Have you started a fantastic construction project?



      The huge bridge is simple - there are almost no people there:



      Gee, people, try typing in Google the phrase "why is the bridge", he himself adds it to the phrase "why is the bridge on the Russian island". Those. everyone is interested in the meaning of the construction of this bridge ...
      1. UAZ Patriot 29 October 2011 22: 06 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Nothing for now. AND WHY BAM IN 20 CENTURY NEEDED IF KER WHO IN SIBERIA AND FOR FAR AWAY ??? THEN AND Fr. RUSSIAN AND THE BRIDGE ... LIFT THOSE AGE?
        1. zczczc
          zczczc 29 October 2011 23: 38 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          UAZ Patriot, Transsiberian was needed even under the king. I would say it was needed a thousand years ago.

          This bridge costs $ 3 billion; it is exactly 10 times more expensive than similar ones in China. How to beat off money? The island that he joins does not even have 0,0001% of the value of Siberia. In no sense, incl. culturological. 5204 people live there. Those. spending only on the bridge is 18 rubles. per person.

          And why is this bridge 4 lanes? We have commonplace roads in the suburbs of Moscow with 2 lanes, and there is a place for expansion there, and the demand is off scale. The situation is the same in all of Russia - everything is in traffic jams even where there is more than enough land for expansion.

          In general, it is impossible to compare with BAM.
          1. Volkhov
            Volkhov 30 October 2011 14: 42 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            A bridge for 3 days of the summit, money all the same will be demagnetized, why save them.
            Another thing is interesting - about. A peculiar geology of Russia is a submerged ridge with traces of strong electrification, and during the Ripple in April 2013 it can jump up above the level of flooding, and if university students who plan there after the summit are able to stay on it, then the island will justify its name.,
            1. zczczc
              zczczc 30 October 2011 17: 36 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Volkhov, for 3 yards you can prepare a supply of food sickly :)

              Maybe the bridge was built in order to exclude the possible landing of the enemy there - after all, it is easy to land from the sea, but then it will not be easy to smoke. And then there is a bridge. True, the bridge can be destroyed with one missile ...

              In general, this is all strange - some kind of show-off.

              And where does infa come from, that our missiles are controlled by them?
              1. Volkhov
                Volkhov 30 October 2011 21: 26 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Yards are alien, they have not forgotten themselves, they are transporting 3 echelons a day to Afghanistan.
                From the landing of the enemy there was a battery to them. Voroshilov with towers from the battleships and other parts, the bridge has nothing to do with it.
                If the missiles were handed over to the Old Believers, they would be independent, and the state passed through Gorbachev, Chubais, Serdyukov and the flocks of Amers. Advisers on all issues. Flight missions come from there, the address is not written in oil paint, and the staff can let or not let go, and that’s all.
                1. zczczc
                  zczczc 31 October 2011 00: 31 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Volkhov, staff, of course, should not know anything. In general, it is scary if it is.
  11. Rashid 28 October 2011 10: 57 New
    • 11
    • 0
    +11
    About Kudrin is not in vain written. Read analytical articles on financial topics on the same site - the financial bondage of Russia is held thanks to Kudrin, the faithful follower of the "great reformer" Gaidar E.T.
    1. Ivan35
      Ivan35 28 October 2011 19: 42 New
      • 8
      • 0
      +8
      Rashid agrees - Kudrin is one of those who does the will of the "Washington Regional Committee" like Chubais and others. Putin is not to blame for this - he as much as possible reduces their number under the "yoke" and so far cannot break free

      We’ll free ourselves when the Russians get through the “trouble” of Pendosov’s propaganda - still haven’t passed unfortunately - and still we are buying dollars to print rubles (nonsense !!) and still we are buying dollars to sell or buy something (all transactions for oil, for example) and until now we again buy dollars with the money we earned, and again Pendosovsky garbage "securities" on them are slavery

      Thus, pendos and manage to eat 30 times more than they produce - robbing us and half the world

      The worst thing for them is if someone opposes their economic robbery - and President Nazarbayev of Kazakhstan has done this more than once at both SCO summits last year and this year - he called for the dollar to be pegged second from the mutual settlements and introduce an alternative reserve currency

      The leaders of Iran and Venezuela say such things - and Russia and China support these ideas - only when they have the strength to put into practice?
      1. valerei 30 October 2011 00: 08 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        And read the basics of political economy and there you will see the main: The amount of money printed should equal the value of the domestic product, plus a few percent for the physical loss of money from various reasons. In short: what they really earned is what they should spend. You do not plan your family budget with a deficit, but rely only on yourself. And the Moscow "wise men" regularly keep inflation at least 8 - 10%. And then, God forbid. It is understood that the alternative currency is our ruble. But real rubles will not be enough for everyone because of our weak economy and industry. And then our Moscow “wise guys” will have to learn from the Americans. And this means that you have to stupidly print money to have enough for everyone, i.e. on the totality of all economies of the future union. And if the union does not work, and the money is printed and in circulation? The Americans are saved by the fact that they are fed by the whole world and all are divided, and in our union there are much fewer countries and they can refuse the union. And then what? Scary to assume! So, not everything is as simple as it might seem from the outside.
    2. zczczc
      zczczc 29 October 2011 20: 32 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Rashidwhat to blame on the accountant? He does not, on his own initiative, do what he does. By the way, I don’t understand if Kudrin was really put to the United States, then whose resignation was on whose initiative and for what purpose?
      1. Aleksey42
        Aleksey42 29 October 2011 21: 30 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Here we can’t remember that it was Kudrin who at one time pulled Putin into the Kremlin. In my opinion, the idea that Putin is an agent of the United States is nonsense, so Kudrin, in my opinion, is also beyond suspicion. Although I do not understand why, say Chubais and Fursenko continue to "do good."
        1. zczczc
          zczczc 31 October 2011 00: 53 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Aleksey42, well, if we take the theory of "getting up from our knees" as a basis, then of course you have to play in two ways - to hold prominent American officials in prominent places, debil louder from TV, open gay clubs, show theft and luxury in every possible way, but actually in the bowels of Russian civilization to revive Russia.

          Only in my opinion this is not confirmed by facts. Prunx corrects me, he believes that is confirmed. Yes, I'm only glad if so. Sincerely glad.

          Where is this bowels? What are we, there are other people who did not see TV and do not degrade every day, watching it, we have a forest that has not been plundered by the Chinese, we have unsold highly profitable factories, we have an army of women who grew up on pure milk, who are ready to bring us 7 children? There is none of this. And that means there is no getting up from your knees.
  12. danilatrg 28 October 2011 11: 03 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Interestingly, but here, besides Samsonov, who else is the thread writing? :)
    The author is often mistaken in his articles. It identifies the problem well, sets a worthy goal, and then carries such nonsense.
  13. Varnaga 28 October 2011 11: 16 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Samsonov, grow up, keep a tight 5!
  14. Patriot
    Patriot 28 October 2011 12: 14 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Magadan
    There may well be agents in the government ...

    Doesn’t it seem to you that the main agents of the West have been at the head of our country since 1991?
  15. Yves762 28 October 2011 12: 30 New
    • -1
    • 0
    -1
    Agents of influence and stats spoil am
  16. Banshee 28 October 2011 14: 49 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    "the blow was dealt with the industrial, military, scientific, educational potentials of Russia. Mostly with the help of the fifth column and various non-governmental organizations, private companies and individuals, such as the actions of Soros and his foundations."

    Come on, it’s right ... We and the government in the faces of Fursenko and Serdyukov do a very good job ...

    So wow a throw, yes ... The article is correct in many respects, that is, a statement of facts, but I think everyone can draw conclusions here.
    1. valerei 30 October 2011 00: 11 New
      • -1
      • 0
      -1
      I agree. It seems to me that one should not look for malicious intent where only stupidity is enough.
  17. His
    His 28 October 2011 17: 21 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The West, like all countries, respects only power. Preferably on the wings of rockets and planes with red stars
    1. Uncle Sam
      Uncle Sam 29 October 2011 21: 10 New
      • -7
      • 0
      -7
      Yes, all these stars are pouring into need, why laugh
      1. Vasilenko Vladimir 1 November 2011 16: 43 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        tell me, why so much bile ?!
  18. Komsomolets 28 October 2011 20: 15 New
    • -1
    • 0
    -1
    The beginning of the article is for health, and the end is for peace. Well, various funds, oligarchs (by the way, they were not mentioned), the middle class, etc. cannot in the state. etc. act uncontrollably, especially if she is controlled by a gebeshnik. Well, if McCain or Biden or someone else is looking for GDP, it’s only to raise his rating within Russia, his policy suits them well, we’ll roll downhill. The appointed amers on him bullied and create the image of the external enemy of Russia - this always unites the Russian people around the leader against the external enemy. It’s a pity that there are no leaders, there are no future edros ...
    1. valerei 30 October 2011 00: 15 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      By the way, there are several election campaigns ahead! Let's make the appropriate choice for all of us: who are we voting for? Though a weak hope, but at least something. Everything is better than croaking and mud!
  19. Kyrgyz 29 October 2011 16: 06 New
    • -1
    • 0
    -1
    pack yes - does not exist
    condemning the conflict of 2008 in Russia did not meet any
    Zyuganov did not hear criticism of the growth of defense spending - on the contrary, he growls that little
    Article by nothing
    1. Aleksey42
      Aleksey42 29 October 2011 21: 35 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      I agree, I do not know condemning the operation in Ossetia. With rock and roll, too, an overlay, Russian rock in many ways does not allow our culture to bend, one Grebenshchikov is worth it!
      1. valerei 30 October 2011 00: 24 New
        • -1
        • 0
        -1
        "In the garden of elderberry, and in Kiev, uncle": where does rock and roll? And I do not like Grebenshchikov, so: who likes oranges, and who drawers from under them!
        1. Aleksey42
          Aleksey42 30 October 2011 06: 19 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          If you read carefully, the author speaks of the deliberate collapse of our culture. So, I meant that we are not Papuans, so that our culture could be destroyed so simply.
          1. Vasilenko Vladimir 1 November 2011 16: 45 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: Aleksey42
            So, I meant that we are not Papuans

            but we look at house-2 and comediclab, not all but many.
  20. runway 29 October 2011 22: 49 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    After all the troubles listed by the author that have befallen our Motherland not as a result of the criminal rule of our leaders, but as a result of a conspiracy of the West, for no reason, he suddenly noticed that Russia was reborn .... (Why is it suddenly? ) Maybe the West has stopped its machinations? It seems not to be observed.
    The author refers to the internal potential of the country. It turns out that the country itself feels that it’s standing at the edge of the abyss and therefore it’s time to revive ...: "But the example of the Stalinist USSR shows that, if necessary, our people can transform the country in the shortest possible time" ....
    But who is stopping the country? The author also figured out - quickly found the guilty.
    And on the “sweet side” he predicted something that even the enemies did not want - the war: “Therefore, there is a significant chance that in December 2011, in winter - in spring 2012, we will see a“ battle ”in Moscow for the future of Russia. If we fail to break "Putin’s clique, then the West will increase external pressure - revolutions and unrest in the South Caucasus, Central Asia (right up to the war), and Ukraine."
    Well, dock this author! As for a drunken sea knee-deep, so for him any topic on - ..... In general, you will be waist-deep ....
    1. valerei 30 October 2011 00: 27 New
      • -1
      • 0
      -1
      Yes! Good walked by the author! And what did you want to say?
    2. Aleksey42
      Aleksey42 30 October 2011 06: 20 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      I agree, we already got these horror stories.
  21. Commoner
    Commoner 1 November 2011 12: 10 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    "Domestic work is currently underway with the protest electorate. The option with Medvedev’s second term has failed, so Putin’s" demonization "is intensifying in the eyes of the western and Russian inhabitants."
    What relation Mr. Putin has to the concept of "empire" is not at all clear. What did he do all the years of his reign? Well, yes, of course, the gas empire. Now, in addition to gas, there has already become nothing to trade on the international arena. And the worker is hammered this gas to the producer - since the West is against Putin, then he is "our man." It's just that Putin is not actively ruining the Empire, he apparently takes care of his interests very much, he wants to hook Europe on a gas needle, and he fell into the US disgrace ... and what about this uncle Vanya in the Russian outback?
    "Everyone will be thrown into the battle from the liberal public and the" Just Cause "to the nationalists and the Communist Party."
    Combed smoothly. Do you want this? Will not work. I know why, but I won’t say :)
  22. Krilion 1 November 2011 14: 26 New
    • -2
    • 0
    -2
    suitable article ... the comments are mostly stupid, especially about the bridge .. everything is as always - cuts from the rolls having gone through the polymers of banduputin support !!!!!!
    1. Antony98
      Antony98 29 July 2012 21: 39 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      I barely made out the last "word". By the way, am I the only one so stupid, or the author, for the idea of ​​reviving the monarchy in Russia?