Tactical thermonuclear bombs of the B61 family (USA)

25
It is not a secret for anyone that particularly successful weapons can be used for decades. At the expense of some events held when necessary, weapon and technicians can solve tasks in a long time. This tendency is especially pronounced in the field of American nuclear weapons. For example, the most recent B-52 bomber in the US Air Force was built in 1962 year. At about the same time, the B61 tactical thermonuclear bomb, still the main ammunition of its class, was created in the United States.

History The B61 bomb began in 1960, when nuclear scientists at the Los Alamos and Sandia National Laboratories were given the task of working out the issue of creating a small-sized aviation bombs with a thermonuclear warhead. As part of the new FUFO project, it was planned to study existing and promising technologies, as well as determine the very possibility of creating the required weapons. If there was a fundamental possibility, specialists should start designing new weapons.

Tactical thermonuclear bombs of the B61 family (USA)


The preliminary study took about two years. Scientists from several research organizations have confirmed the possibility of creating a relatively light bomb with a full-fledged thermonuclear warhead and all related equipment. During the first few months, all work continued under the FUFO project. In January, 1963, the development received a new designation - XT-61. By this time, the basic requirements for new weapons were identified. A prospective bomb should have a weight of no more than 700-800 pounds and carry a thermonuclear charge of variable power. In addition, there were quite serious requirements for the use of such weapons. The military wanted a bomb suitable for dumping at different speeds and altitudes.

The simplest stage of the project was the development of the hull. Already 20 August 1963, began testing of buildings with ballast. The purpose of these tests was to determine the aerodynamic characteristics of the developed hull when dumping from different heights and at different speeds. By the time the field tests began, several of the proposed hull structures had passed a series of blowdowns in the wind tunnel, so the test faults were completed on the whole successfully.

The next two years were spent on improving various units and creating a full-fledged thermonuclear warhead. Work on the organization of mass production of new weapons started only in May 1965 of the year. The assembly of the first batch of new weapons also took a lot of time. The first XT-61 bomb was manufactured in October on the 66. By this time, promising products received a new designation used to this day - B61. At the very beginning of 1967, the first bombs of the new model were handed over to the troops. The new weapon was classified, because of what the Air Force personnel were forbidden to use its name in the negotiations. The military were forced to use euphemisms like "silver bullet", "external suspension", etc.

The new tactical thermonuclear bomb had a cylindrical body with a conical head fairing. The total length of the bomb of the first B61-0 modification was 3,6 m with a case diameter of 33 cm. The total weight of the product was 700 pounds (about 320 kg). Later, various projects for the modernization of the bomb were created, during which both the dimensions and the weight changed. Nevertheless, despite all the changes, similar parameters of the product remained approximately at the same level.



The hull lines were calculated taking into account the transport of a bomb on an external sling when flying at supersonic speeds. The carrier plane with the B61-0 bomb could fly at speeds up to M = 2. However, in some cases, it was necessary to slow down before dropping a bomb.

All bombs of the B61 family were divided into four main compartments. The head compartment contained several fuses. A radio-fuse was used for blasting at a given height, and piezoelectric systems for contact blasting. In the central compartment were placed all the units of the thermonuclear warhead. To ensure performance in various conditions, the central compartment was sealed and equipped with a durable outer casing. In the rear compartment of the corps was a set of equipment for the management and maintenance of the bomb. In particular, there were all the necessary connectors for connecting to the onboard systems of the aircraft carrier. To the body was attached tail unit. In its central part of the place was provided for braking parachute.

One of the main requirements for a promising tactical thermonuclear bomb was to ensure that it could be used with various aircraft carriers. Due to the use of standardized components and the simplest set of onboard equipment, it was possible to ensure the highest flexibility of use. As the B61 family of bombs and combat aircraft developed, the number of possible carrier types exceeded two dozen. Such weapons can be used both by tactical aircraft fighter-bombers and heavy bombers.

A set of fuses and a tail parachute also increased the flexibility of use. Depending on the mission and type of target, bombs of the B61 family can operate in several modes. Undermining the warhead can be done at a predetermined height, when touching the ground or with some delay after touching (up to 80 s). In order to avoid consequences for the aircraft carrier after dropping the bomb, a parachute was thrown and it was lowered to the target. During the tests, it was revealed that a strong Kevlar parachute with a diameter of 7,3 m at a discharge speed of about M = 1,2 is capable of slowing down a bomb to 50-55 km / h in just two seconds. The bomb was allowed to drop from heights from 15 m to the ceiling of the aircraft carrier.

Over time, it became possible to use B61 bombs as anti-bunker weapons. For this proposed bombs with a reinforced hull. When falling, the bomb should not have opened the parachute, maintaining the speed necessary for penetration into the ground. To explode, a piezoelectric fuse with a set delay was used.



Depending on various reset parameters, etc. the circular deviation of bombs of the B61 family, which were not equipped with any guidance systems, did not exceed 200 m. Given the power of the warhead, this accuracy was sufficient for most of the intended tasks.

The most important feature of the thermonuclear warheads of the B61 family of bombs was the ability to set the power of the explosion depending on the task. Uranium charge with an initiating charge of explosives was used as the first stage of warheads. As a second stage, the bomb carried a charge of lithium-6 deuteride. At the expense of some measures, bombs of the B61 family could be undermined with various capacities. The number of such settings and possible powers of detonation depended on the modification of bombs.

The basic version of the warhead capacity up to 170 CT was so successful that in the future it was used in the development of some other thermonuclear warheads used as part of other tactical and strategic weapons. In the early seventies, the W69 warhead was developed for the AGM-69 SRAM missiles. For AGM-53 Condor missiles, the W73 products were intended. A total of nine types of warheads were developed based on the B61 bomb warhead. Most of them have already been decommissioned and disposed of.

For more than half a century, more than ten modifications of the B61-0 base bomb have been developed. All these types of aircraft armament differed from each other by various design features and equipment. In this case, however, not all modifications have reached mass production. Modifications with the legend Mod. 6, Mod. 8 and Mod. 9 was developed, but did not reach production. Other versions of the thermonuclear bomb alternately replaced and complemented each other in the arsenals.

In its basic configuration, B61 bombs remained the main tactical thermonuclear weapons of the US Air Force until the early eighties. In 1980, the deliveries of serial products B61 Mod. 3 or B61-3. When upgrading, minor modifications were made to the design of a thermonuclear warhead. First of all, the initiating explosive was replaced, which led to the undermining of the charge of the first stage. The bomb control system for the first time in the family was built on the basis of microprocessors. The B61-3 bomb had four types of explosive power: 0,3 kt, 1,5 kt, 60 kt and 170 kt.

Simultaneously with the B61-3 product, the B61-4 bomb appeared. According to reports, these munitions were similar in design, but differed in combat units. Air Bomb Mod. 4 also had four power settings: 0,3 CT, 1,5 CT, 10 CT and 45 CT.

Soon the B61-7 modification appeared. The aim of this project was to update the existing bombs of the first models in order to improve their characteristics. The design of the thermonuclear charge and the electronics of the onboard systems control were seriously reworked. A characteristic feature of the bomb Mod. 7 is a relatively high power: from 10 to 340 CT. Thus, the bombs of this modification are the most powerful in the family.



As the MGM-31C Pershing II ballistic missiles were written off as part of the implementation of the medium-range and short-range missile treaty, the United States released W85-type thermonuclear warheads. It was decided to use these warheads as part of the next modification of the B61 bomb - Mod. 10. The operator had the opportunity to choose one of four capacities of the explosion: 0,3 CT, 1,5 CT, 10 CT and 80 CT.

In the mid-nineties, the latest at the moment serial modification of the bomb - B61-11. It is a modified version of the B61-7 with a reinforced body. New durable structural elements allow the bomb to sink into the ground before the explosion. This increases the impact of the bomb on the underground target - a bunker or other similar structure. According to different sources, the power of a charge of bombs B61 Mod. 7 and B61 Mod. 11 is the same - up to 340 CT. Depending on the parameters of the reset bomb Mod. 11 can punch up to 6 m of concrete or more 20 m of soil.

Since the mid-sixties, the US industry has released 3155 bombs B61 of various modifications. During operation, some of these products were upgraded over time, as a result of which the service life was extended and, to a certain extent, the characteristics were increased. However, thermonuclear weapons have a limited lifespan, with the result that most of the different types of B61 bombs were written off by the beginning of the two thousandths. According to some sources, by 2002, more than 1900 bombs were written off and disposed of. No less than 1200 while remaining in warehouses.

The existing bombs of the B61 family are still suitable for use, but they no longer fully meet the requirements of the time. For this reason, in 2010, the US Department of Energy, in charge of all nuclear and thermonuclear weapons projects, initiated the development of a new modification of tactical bombs. It was planned to spend about 2 billion dollars for design and the subsequent modernization. A new bomb should get the designation B61-12.

It was reported that a new model of the bomb should be based on the units of its predecessors. It was supposed to equip the Mod bomb. 12 new tail section. It was proposed to remove the parachute system that does not meet modern requirements. Instead of a parachute in the tail of the bomb should be located guidance systems. As part of the B61-12 product, a block of equipment similar to that used in the JDAM bomb will be used. Due to the satellite navigation system and the rudders, the updated bomb will be able to hit the target with increased accuracy.

It is expected that the new control systems will significantly improve the combat characteristics of the updated bombs. In particular, this will make it possible to abandon the use of high-power warheads. The new B61-12, according to some data, will hit the target with an explosion of 0,3 km, 1,5 kt, 10 kt or 50 kt.



The first tests of a modernized thermonuclear bomb were planned for 2015. Around the same time, preparations should begin for the modernization of the aircraft, which will become carriers of B61-12. Operation of the new weapon will begin no earlier than 2020 of the year. In the future, it is possible to integrate such bombs into the armament complex of promising LRS-B bombers. In addition, work is already underway to ensure the compatibility of the new bomb and the F-35 fighter-bomber.

Earlier, some details of the LEP / B61-12 project were reported, which may be the reason for disputes in the international arena. The fact is that the Pentagon and some NATO countries are planning to modernize their aircraft equipment in the foreseeable future. Among other things, upgraded aircraft should receive a set of equipment for the use of tactical thermonuclear bombs of the new model. Thus, the states that have acceded to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons will be able to obtain aircraft capable of carrying such weapons. Such plans and actions need additional study and evaluation of the competent authorities.

As follows from the published information, all available tactical bombs of B61 of various models will be re-equipped in the foreseeable future according to a new project. Thus, the life of a fairly old bombs will be extended for another few years. By the end of this decade, it will be half a century since the start of operation of the B61 bombs. Before the advent of the LRS-B bombers, which are planned to be one of the main carriers of such weapons, it will take another 10-15 years. As a result, B61 tactical bombs can become one of the oldest types of weapons available to the United States. Whether the strategy of upgrading existing bombs justifies itself - time will tell.


On the materials of the sites:
http://globalsecurity.org/
http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/
http://fas.org/
http://nevskii-bastion.ru/
http://nti.org/
http://nukestrat.com/
25 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +15
    8 May 2015 06: 52
    Thanks to the author for the article. The article, as always with Ryabov Kirill, is simply excellent. Regarding the problems of tactical nuclear weapons and, in particular, US bomb weapons with thermonuclear filling, the development vectors of American troops are understandable in principle. Continuous improvement, using the low-cost flight control technology and reducing the aiming zone from already used JDAM bombs. As a result, we get weapons in essence that can fulfill the task of strategic nuclear weapons, but which do not fall under the START treaty. At the same time, the costs of modernization are extremely small. Everything is logical and extremely pragmatic. (To our great regret)
    1. 0
      24 June 2015 16: 06
      I would say that the author, Cyril, did not say much about the fact that it is impossible to extend the life of a thermonuclear bomb by simply rearranging the components from bomb to bomb.

      1. Failure of electronics due to exposure together with a strong radiation source. And testing aging with time (diffusion, corrosion, oxidation, etc.)
      2. "Poisoning" of the first stage charge by isotopes - "neutron poisons", especially concerns plutonium. An extremely costly operation, but for uranium it is 3 times less common, which is financially tolerable.
      3. Decrease in the concentration of tritium in the second stage to a critical one with the effect of a "baby cracker". We need to develop new tritium, which is not the cheapest thing and requires special equipment.
      4. Chemical stability of initiator explosives. This operation is inexpensive and is carried out infrequently, non-critical stage of alteration.

      Those. not everything is so simple: in fact, the bomb must be redone by 50% in order to extend its life for a new term. And it’s not a fact that out of 10 bombs it will turn out 10. If my memory serves me right, the term for replacing tritium is about once every 3 years, revision of plutonium - about once every 7-8 years, uranium - can be extended up to 1 time in 30-35 years .
  2. +1
    8 May 2015 06: 57
    A curious aggregate. But how interesting is it with nuclear weapons? Who in the subject please do a review.
    1. +9
      8 May 2015 07: 27
      In our country, this topic is deeply classified, and there is nowhere to find information about "products"!
      And if you find out on your own, get ready, they will come for you and invite you to a conversation!
      I do not advise "digging the topic" with us!
      And with ammunition, everything is fine with us! I suppose it’s much better than theirs!
      1. +5
        8 May 2015 12: 36
        Googling museums, there is something. Here is our tactical one.
  3. 0
    8 May 2015 07: 22
    A well-made baton lasts a long time.
    With the discharge from 15 meters of height is unclear ....
    1. 0
      8 May 2015 12: 46
      Flying at very low altitudes and dumping with deceleration? Why not, in principle, it’s better to have the opportunity than not :).
    2. 0
      8 May 2015 14: 06
      I think it’s about cabling
  4. -2
    8 May 2015 08: 22
    Somewhere when it was said that the atomic "grenade" weighs 16 kg. I think if it will be hot in new Yorkies with Langeles!
    1. +2
      8 May 2015 10: 43
      ..... I don’t know about grenades, but wearable tactical charges (knapsacks) were .... For special use .... hi
      1. +4
        8 May 2015 12: 05
        Quote: aleks 62
        ..... I don’t know about grenades, but wearable tactical charges (knapsacks) were .... For special use .... hi

        Yes, the cylinder is about 300 mm by 120. Weight is up to 40 kg. Power is about 0,1 Kt. In general, two tonne-tonne wagons. It is extremely difficult to make nuclear weapons of smaller mass and size. Attempts were made to develop a fist the size of a fist based on Co 60. I think it's fake...
        1. 0
          8 May 2015 13: 59
          for shells 6 "they did the same. for our genoncindes and self-propelled" bouquets "and the msta generation. Maybe it didn't make sense?
          1. 0
            24 June 2015 16: 09
            Quote: Rus86
            for shells 6 "they did the same. for our genoncindes and self-propelled" bouquets "and the msta generation. Maybe it didn't make sense?

            Did you call our "Geocynth" so veiled "Genocide"? There is something in this, of course, but too original.
        2. 0
          8 May 2015 22: 54
          Newspapers write ...
          my-news.ru/2013/02/sverxmalye-yadernye-zaryady-ot-patrona-do-snaryada/
        3. +2
          9 May 2015 02: 22
          Quote: zennon
          Attempts have been reported to develop a fist the size of a fist based on Co 60. I think this is fake ...

          Definitely a fake. None of the cobalt isotopes is close to the parameters required for the creation of nuclear weapons.

          Perhaps it was California or hafnium ... but this is also a newspaper duck, technology does not yet allow such miniaturization.
  5. +11
    8 May 2015 09: 11
    In general, the publication makes a favorable impression, with the exception of this:
    As the first stage of warheads used uranium charge with an initiating explosive charge.
    Due to their large dimensions and weight, as well as low efficiency, the USSR and the USA abandoned nuclear charges of the "cannon type" based on U-235 back in the 50s. All modern nuclear devices are of the Pu-239 implosion type. They are many times more compact and efficient.
    The principle of action of an implosive charge type
    1. +4
      8 May 2015 10: 57
      .... The picture is beautiful - at the level of a school physics textbook .... This type of undermining has not been used for a long time (it was implemented on the ancient American "Fat Man") .... Very large dimensions .... Basically for the implementation of the criterion of critical masses are used segmented, with many milled planes, plutonium or uranium segments .... A gain in dimensions .... To adjust the explosion power, "neutron tubes" are used, giving an additional neutron controlled flux, since natural neutrons are not enough for a complete reaction ..... With this method of detonation, as you drew, not all the mass of uranium (plutonium) will react and, as the nuclear scientists themselves say, it will be "zilch" approximately (for a critical mass of 16 kg of uranium) at the level of 200-250 tons TNT .... It is described in more detail and in an accessible way in one book (I don’t remember the name now, 4-5 years ago an article from it dedicated to the device and operation of ammunition of this purpose was in the magazine Popular Mechanics ..... The book, by the way, was written our specialist for the general public interested in modern weapons) ... hi
      1. 0
        8 May 2015 12: 09
        Quote: aleks 62
        . To regulate the power of the explosion, "neutron tubes" are used, which give an additional neutron controlled flux, because natural neutrons are not enough for a complete reaction ...

        And what initiates the neutron emission before the explosion? hi
        1. +1
          8 May 2015 12: 20
          .... And what initiates the neutron emission before the explosion? ...

          ..... I will not describe in detail .... On early ammunition (the first amerovskie bombs) this role was performed by isotope sources, so the first bombs were essentially experimental samples ... Then they came up with the "tubes" ... I will describe it, but I think it was carried out on some physical principles (such as an X-ray tube) .... Dosed injection of neutrons makes it possible to regulate the power of the explosion .... Somewhere like this .... If you are very interested, look for the recommended book ..... I remember what was in the Popular Mechanics magazine in the Weapon section or in the February or May issue, as I wrote above, about 5 years ago .... If you want, you will find it ... Unfortunately, the magazine has not survived for me. .. hi
          1. +1
            8 May 2015 12: 39
            Quote: aleks 62
            Dosed neutron throw-in makes it possible to control the power of the explosion .... Something like this ...

            This is understandable. Irradiation by neutrons makes the initiating charge extremely active, easily responding to the critical mass. But the design itself .... Thanks, I'll look! hi
            1. 0
              11 May 2015 13: 15
              As you find, unsubscribe, also curious
              1. -1
                16 May 2015 00: 52

                aleks 62
                Dosed neutron stuffing / from tubes?! / Makes it possible to control the power of the explosion .... Something like that ... / in Popmeh)) / on some physical principles ..

                Sometimes it’s better to chew than write .. This is not even a school, it’s babble.

                Homework - find 10 segments on the "school picture"))
            2. 0
              24 June 2015 16: 12
              Quote: zennon
              This is understandable. Irradiation by neutrons makes the initiating charge extremely active, easily responding to the critical mass. But the design itself .... Thanks, I'll look!

              No, it doesn’t. Here is another physics. And if you tell you, then you will leave for Iran-S.Korea-Pakistan and they will be the local Aleksandrov or Kurchatov, and you will probably get rich.
      2. 0
        9 May 2015 02: 27
        Quote: aleks 62
        With this method of detonation, as you have drawn, not all of the mass of uranium (plutonium) will react

        And no matter what method of initiation is used, most of the charge is uselessly sprayed, and only a small percentage is involved in the reaction ... Only the annihilation process has 100% efficiency.

        That is why scientists constantly come up with new arrangements of charges, methods of initiation, they surround everything with a neutron reflector, etc., all to increase the efficiency - otherwise, for example, less than 700 g of uranium (out of 64 kg) took part in the reaction of the "baby" ...
        1. +1
          9 May 2015 06: 55
          Quote: psiho117
          most of the charge is sprayed uselessly

          - being crushed by the force of the explosion into the smallest particles, it will also be a source of radioactive contamination of the area.
  6. +1
    8 May 2015 09: 54
    Quote: Chen
    A well-made baton lasts a long time.
    With the discharge from 15 meters of height is unclear ....


    There she wrote about slowing down to 80 seconds!
  7. AAV
    0
    12 May 2015 10: 17
    Quote: Vladimir 23rus
    A curious aggregate. But how interesting is it with nuclear weapons? Who in the subject please do a review.

    I somehow came across such a book "Vishnevsky Valentin - The smell of an atomic bomb. Memoirs of an atomic officer".
    This, of course, is not a review of Soviet nuclear weapons, but it was interesting to read and it was informative for me.
    Here is a link to the book http://royallib.com/book/vishnevskiy_valentin/zapah_atomnoy_bombi_vospominaniya_
    ofitsera_atomshchika.html