The failure of the last major offensive of the Wehrmacht

30
The failure of the last major offensive of the Wehrmacht

70 years ago, 6 March 1945, the Balaton operation began. It was the last major defensive operation of the Red Army against the German troops during the Great Patriotic War. Soviet troops repelled the attack of the German Army Group South (Operation Spring Awakening) and launched an offensive against Vienna.

The German command hoped to push the Red Army beyond the Danube, thereby eliminating the threat to Vienna and the southern regions of Germany and retaining one of the last oil fields available to the Germans. German offensive 6th tank SS Army, 2nd Tank and 6th Field, 3rd Hungarian Army was the last major offensive operation of the Wehrmacht in World War II.



The position before the operation. Party plans

Soviet Union. The offensive of the Soviet troops on the southern wing of the strategic Soviet-German front led to the liberation from Nazism and the pro-fascist forces of Southeast and Central Europe. The active offensive of the 2, 3 and 4 of the Ukrainian fronts in Hungary and Czechoslovakia was delayed by large forces of the German troops from the central, Berlin direction. Soviet troops were approaching the borders of southern Germany. The defeat of the Third Reich was just around the corner.

Three days after the capture of Budapest, February 17, the Supreme Commander ordered the troops of the 2 and 3 of the Ukrainian fronts to conduct an offensive operation in order to defeat Army Group South and capture the region of Bratislava, Brno and Vienna. Soviet troops had to go to the approaches to southern Germany. The troops of the 2 of the Ukrainian Front were to strike from the region north of Esztergom in the direction of Bratislava and then on Vienna. The 3 Ukrainian Front planned a strike from the area north of Lake Balaton, bypassing the capital of Austria from the south. The offensive was scheduled for March 15.

By mid-February, the main forces of Malinovsky fought in the south-eastern part of Czechoslovakia and liberated part of Slovakia. February 17, the enemy's strike force, which numbered 400 tanks and SPGs (1 tank corps of the SS), struck 7 Guards Army Shumilova, which occupied a bridgehead on the west bank of the River Gron. During the brutal battle, the army of Shumilov suffered heavy losses and was forced to leave the bridgehead, moving to the east bank of the river. Malinovsky threw a number of reinforcements into the battle area and stabilized the front. The Germans could not develop the first success.

The troops of the 2 of the Ukrainian Front were located north of the Danube, at the turn of the river Hron. The troops of the 3 of the Ukrainian Front and the 46 of the 2 of the Ukrainian Front fought in the western part of Hungary at the turn east of Esztergom, the southwestern shore of Lake Velence, Lake Balaton and the northern shore of the Drava. On the left flank of the front Tolbukhina troops of the People’s Liberation Army of Yugoslavia acted.

However, even before the completion of the preparation of a new offensive, in the second half of February, Soviet intelligence obtained data on the concentration of a powerful German tank group in Western Hungary. Initially, these data were perceived in the General Staff with suspicion. It was surprising that at that moment, when the Soviet troops were in 60 km from Berlin and were preparing to attack the German capital, Hitler removed the 6 th SS tank amy from the west and transferred it not to Berlin, but to Hungary.

Soon the data was confirmed, and it became clear that the enemy was preparing a major offensive in the area of ​​Lake Balaton. Therefore, the Soviet Stake gave instructions to 2 and 3 in the Ukrainian fronts to go on the defensive, deplete the enemy in tough defensive battles and defeat the German shock group. At the same time, the Soviet troops were to continue the preparation of the Vienna operation, so that immediately after the defeat of the enemy grouping they went on the offensive in the Vienna direction.

Intelligence data on the rearrangement of enemy forces made it possible to identify the directions of impending strikes and, most importantly, the direction of the main attack. The command of 3 of the Ukrainian Front, using the experience of the Battle of Kursk, in the intended direction of the main attack of the enemy equipped a defense in depth. In some places its depth reached 25-30 km. Special attention was paid to anti-tank defense, including the creation of barriers of all kinds. Dangerous directions were heavily mined. In total, 83-kilometer stretch from Lake Balaton to Gant, where the main attack of the enemy’s armored forces was awaited, prepared 66 anti-tank areas and concentrated almost two thirds of the entire front artillery. At a number of sites, the density of guns and mortars brought the 60-70 trunks to one kilometer. Shelters for people and equipment were prepared, anti-tank reserves were allocated. Particular attention was paid to the possibility of a wide maneuver by forces both on the front and from the depths.

In the area where the main attack of the enemy was awaited, Soviet troops were deployed in two echelons. The first was the 4-I Guards Army of Nikanor Zakhvatayev and the 26-I Army of Nikolai Gagen, the second - the 27-I Army of Sergei Trofimenko, which was transferred from the 2-Ukrainian Front. On the secondary direction from the western tip of Lake Balaton were the troops of the 57-th army of Mikhail Sharokhin. On the left flank, the 1 th Bulgarian army was under the command of Vladimir Stoychev. The left flank of the 3 of the Ukrainian Front in the Valpovo area was adjacent to the 3-I Yugoslav Army. The 18 th and 23 th tank, 1 th Guards mechanized and 5 th Guards cavalry corps, as well as several artillery and other units and formations were located in the reserve of the front.




Germany. By order of Adolf Hitler, the German-Hungarian troops were to launch a counteroffensive in the area of ​​Lake Balaton. As early as mid-January 1945, the High Command issued an order to transfer the 6-th SS Panzer Army from the Ardennes and a number of formations from Italy to Hungary. 25 January 1945 The Fuhrer declared that the oil-bearing areas and oil sources of Hungary are of paramount importance now, since without this area, which gives the Third Reich 80% oil production, it will be impossible to continue the war. Germany has only two oil fields left - in Zietersdorf (Austria) and in the area of ​​Lake Balaton (Hungary). In order to keep the last sources of oil necessary for the air and armored forces, the German High Command transferred the main strike forces from the Western Front to Hungary.

Despite the threat in the Berlin area and the heavy fighting in Eastern Pomerania, where they initially wanted to transfer the SS 6 tank army, the German command decided to launch a counterstrike in Hungary. With the success of the operation, the Germans hoped to throw the Red Army troops beyond the Danube, eliminating the threat of southern Germany to their groups in Austria and Czechoslovakia.

Thus, the German command continued to attach exceptional importance to the holding of the Hungarian bridgehead, from where the routes to Austria and southern Germany went. In Western Hungary and Austria, there were the last oil production areas and refineries, whose products were of key importance to the tank and air forces. And Austria was important for the presence of large steel, engineering, automotive and armory factories, industry for the production of ammunition. So by the beginning of 1945, 600 Austrian enterprises were producing a significant amount of weapons, equipment and ammunition every month. Western Hungary and Austria were the last lines of defense from the south. In addition, these areas provided human resources to continue the war.

The German command has developed a plan of operation "Spring awakening." Wehrmacht struck three dissecting strike. The 6-I SS tank army of Joseph (Zapp) Dietrich and the 6-I field army of George Balck attacked the main attack from the area of ​​Velence and the north-eastern part of Lake Balaton. They were supported by the 3-I of the Hungarian army of Josef Hezenia. The main strike force of Army Group South was striking in a southeast direction against Dunafüldvár. In some areas, 50-70 tanks and assault guns were concentrated on 1 km of front.

The second blow south of. Balaton, from the Nagykanikis region, in the direction of Kaposvar, applied the 2-I tank army of Maximilian de Angelis. The German forces delivered the third blow from the Donji-Miholyats area to the north, on Pecs and on the Mokhach direction towards the 6 SS Panzer Army. It was applied by the 91 Army Corps from Army Group E.

Three dissecting blows were to destroy the Soviet defense, to destroy the front of the 3 of the Ukrainian Front. After the German troops reached the Danube, they were to develop an offensive to the north with a part of the forces and fight off Budapest, and with a part of the forces to turn south. The beginning of the attack was scheduled for the morning of March 6 1945.

Thus, the German troops received the task of destroying in parts the main forces of the 3 of the Ukrainian Front and dropping the remnants of the Soviet troops beyond the Danube. This made it possible to restore the front line along the Danube, and to stabilize the situation on the entire strategic southern sector of the Eastern Front. After the successful completion of the Balaton operation, it was possible to strike the flank with a blow to the 2-th Ukrainian Front. After this, the liberated forces, primarily armored formations, were planning to transfer to Berlin, strengthening its defenses.



The forces of the parties

THE USSR. The 3 of the Ukrainian Front under the command of Fyodor Tolbukhin included Soviet 37 rifle divisions, 3 cavalry divisions and 6 Bulgarian infantry divisions, 1 fortified area, 2 tank and 1 mechanized corps. From the air, ground troops supported the forces of the 17-I air army of Vladimir Sudetz and the 5-I air army of Sergey Goryunov from the 2-second Ukrainian front. There are more than 400 thousands of soldiers and officers, about 7 thousand guns and mortars, 400 tanks and self-propelled guns, about 1 thousand planes.

Germany. The forces of the 3rd Ukrainian Front were opposed by the forces of Army Group “South” under the command of Otto Wöhler: the 6th SS Panzer Army, the “Balk” Army Group (6th Army, the remnants of the 1st and 3rd Hungarian armies), 2- I am a tank army; and part of Army Group E. From the air, German-Hungarian troops supported part of the 4th air fleet and the Hungarian air force.

Together with the 6 SS Panzer Army deployed from the Western Front, the German forces numbered 31 divisions, including 11 tank, 5 combat groups and 1 motorized brigade. There are more than 430 thousand soldiers and officers, more than 5,6 thousand guns and mortars, about 900 tanks and SPGs, 900 armored personnel carriers and 850 combat aircraft.

Thus, by the number of infantry Germans and Hungarians had a slight advantage, in artillery and airplanes there was a slight advantage over the Red Army. But in terms of tanks and self-propelled guns, the Germans had more than double superiority and placed their main hope on them.


The Royal Tiger heavy tank from the Feldkhernhalle heavy tank battalion hit a mine and dropped into a ditch
Photo source: http://waralbum.ru/

Battle

German troops delivered a powerful blow to 6 March 1945. The first blows were delivered on the southern flank. Even at night, positions of the Bulgarian and Yugoslav armies were attacked, and early in the morning they hit the 57 army. At the site of the 57 Army, the Germans carried out an hour-long artillery preparation and at the cost of great efforts and losses could penetrate the Soviet defense. However, the command of the army undertook a series of retaliatory measures, introducing second-echelon troops and artillery reserves into the battle, which prevented further advance of the enemy. As a result, the Germans advanced just 6-8 km south of Lake Balaton.

The Germans, in spite of the brave resistance of the Bulgarian and Yugoslav forces, crossed the Drava and captured two bridgeheads, each with a width of up to 1 km in depth, in the area of ​​the 3 th defense of the Bulgarian and 8 th Yugoslav armies. However, the German troops failed to launch an offensive against Pec and Mohacs. The Soviet command, in order to strengthen the defense in this sector, sent the 5 Infantry Corps and the division of the Guard mortars to help. This stabilized the situation in this sector of the front. The Bulgarian and Soviet troops, with the support of the Soviet forces, repulsed the blow of the troops of Army Group “E” and launched a counterattack. German beachheads were eliminated. Fighting on this frontline continued until March 133. Thus, the German offensive on the southern flank (Operation “Forest Devil”) was foiled.

In the morning, after the 30-minute artillery preparation, the German 6-I tank army SS and 6-I field army launched an offensive in the sector of the 4-th guards and 26-th armies. To break through the Soviet defense, the Germans massively threw armored vehicles into battle. In some areas, the number of tanks and assault guns reached 70 vehicles on 1-2 km of front. Massively used new heavy and medium tanks "Tiger-2" and "Panther". By the end of the day, the Germans had penetrated 4 km into the defenses of the Soviet troops and took the Sheregayes stronghold. The Soviet command, in order to strengthen the defense, began to introduce the 18 tank corps into battle. The 3 amphibious division of the 35 Guards Rifle Corps from the 27 Army was also sent here. On the same day, stubborn battles were fought in the defense zone of the 1 Guards Fortified Area of ​​the 4 Guards Army.

March 7, with the massive support of the Luftwaffe, the German troops resumed the offensive. A particularly difficult situation was in the defense zone of the 26 Army of Gagen, where it was concentrated to 200 tanks and SPG. The Germans constantly maneuvered their forces, looking for weak points in the defense of the Soviet army. The Soviet command transferred anti-tank reserves to the threatened sectors. Army Gagen reinforced 5-m Guards Cavalry Corps and 208-th self-propelled artillery brigade. In addition, in order to strengthen the defense of the first echelon, Trofimenko, the 27 Army, began to move into the second line of defense. A large role in repelling the enemy offensive that day was played by massive strikes of Sudetz's 17 Air Army in the attacking orders of the German tank and infantry divisions.

In two days of persistent battle, the German forces were able to penetrate into the Soviet defense four kilometers south of the island of Velence and seven kilometers west of the Sharviz Canal. The Wehrmacht could not break through the tactical zone of defense of the Soviet troops. Timely measures taken to strengthen the defense and stubborn resistance of the Soviet troops prevented the Germans from breaking through.


Trophy German tank Pz.Kpfw. V "Panther" from the 366 th SAP (self-propelled artillery regiment). 3-th Ukrainian Front. Hungary, March 1945 of the year

On March 8-9, heavy fighting continued. On March 8, the German command brought its main forces into battle. The Germans continued to look for weaknesses, throwing large masses of armored vehicles into attacks in some areas. More than 250 tanks and self-propelled guns operated in the direction of the main attack. The fighting continued day and night. Based on a decrease in the effectiveness of the Soviet aviation and artillery the Germans continued their attacks even at night. On March 9, the German command brought another tank division into battle. As a result, the Hagen army held back the onslaught of up to 320 tanks and self-propelled guns.

As a result, the Wehrmacht broke through the main and second lines of defense of the Soviet troops and penetrated 10-24 kilometers in the main direction. However, success was still far away, since it was necessary to break through the rear army and front lines of defense, and the main forces were already brought into battle and suffered heavy losses. From 10 in March, at the direction of the Stavka, the aviation of the 2 of the Ukrainian Front — the 5-I Air Army of Goryunov — joined the enemy offensive. In addition, by order of the Stavka, the 3 th Guards Army of the Glagolev deployed to the south-east of the Hungarian capital was transferred to the 9 of the Ukrainian Front. Tolbukhin had a large reserve in case the situation worsened.

Especially hard fighting broke out on March 10-14. On March 10, an enemy armored fist between Velenze and Balaton had already 450 machines. There were fierce battles. A huge role in repelling enemy attacks in these days was played by artillery, aircraft and tanks. The German command, trying to break into the Soviet defenses at all costs, March 14 threw into its battle its last reserve - the 6 Tank Division. For two days only the troops of the 27 Army Trofimenko opposed the powerful enemy grouping with more than 300 tanks and assault guns. The Germans were able to advance 30 km into the depths of the Soviet defense.

However, soon the forces of the German divisions were exhausted. There were no reserves to continue the offensive. The Germans could not completely break through the defenses of the Soviet armies. By the end of March 15, many German units, including selected SS units, having lost faith in the success of the further offensive, began to refuse to go on the attack. As a result, the German counteroffensive choked. Under the cover of tank units, which continued to fight hard, the rest of the troops began to retreat to their original positions and went over to defense. Hitler went into a rage and ordered the SS 6 tank army to dismantle the honorary armbands from the uniform.


German SAU "Vespe" after hitting a large-caliber projectile. Hungary, Lake Velence

Results

The last major German offensive ended with the defeat of the Wehrmacht. A major role in this success of the 3 of the Ukrainian Front was played by intelligence, which in time revealed the plans of the enemy. Otherwise, the situation could be much more dangerous.

German troops suffered heavy losses in personnel and equipment - more than 40 thousand people, about 500 tanks and self-propelled guns, more than 300 guns and mortars, about 200 aircraft. But the most important thing was finally undermined the morale of the Wehrmacht, including selected SS troops. The positions of the German-Hungarian troops in Western Hungary were weakened, which played a large role in the subsequent Vienna offensive. In addition, the weakened 6-SS Panzer Army, which lost most of its equipment, could not help the defense of Berlin.

Soviet troops were able to exhaust the enemy with stubborn defense, disrupting the Germans' attempt to restore the front along the Danube, and almost without operational pause went over to the offensive in the Vienna direction. The loss of the 3 of the Ukrainian Front amounted to about 33 thousand people. The Bulgarian-Yugoslav troops were able to repel the blows of the enemy and, by going to the counter-offensive, captured the cities of Drava Sabolch, Drava Polkonya and several other settlements.

Brief in time, but saturated with events and persistent battles, the Balaton operation along with the battle of Kursk is a model of the high organization and skillful conduct of operational defense by the Red Army.


Captured by Soviet troops in the city of Szekesfehervarvar, German tanks and self-propelled guns, abandoned due to lack of fuel

Germans retreat from Hungary
30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +33
    6 March 2015 08: 39
    Yes, it was a meat grinder. All the same, our grandfathers were truly heroes in strength of mind, such a tank armada was stopped. It's not for you to drive two divisions of the Fritzes around the dunes with a lunch break, and then present it as the largest battle of 2 MV on a par with Stalingrad.
    1. +6
      6 March 2015 11: 47
      "Dunes" is El-Alamein? And then the people do not understand.
      1. Bug
        +5
        6 March 2015 12: 40
        the Germans lost there only because they could not organize supplies through the Mediterranean Sea ... johnny drowned whatever they got .. that's their biggest mistake ... Malta ....
        1. avt
          +2
          6 March 2015 13: 27
          Quote: Bug
          here is their biggest mistake ... Malta ....

          Yes . good Moreover, there was a chance to take it before the Angles created a full-fledged aviation group there. But for some reason they decided that they would extinguish everything by bombing alone. It was a real strategic miscalculation that did not allow to take control of the Suez Canal. Without the capture of Malta, the entire African epic of the German-Italian troops resulted in a banal adventure.
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. calocha
          +3
          6 March 2015 23: 11
          In the subject! Belarusian creation ..
    2. Denis fj
      +2
      6 March 2015 13: 11
      Something reminds Ukraine just like a Debaltsev boiler.
  2. Denis Skiff M2.0
    +6
    6 March 2015 09: 47
    Quote: sannych
    Yes, it was a meat grinder. All the same, our grandfathers were truly heroes in strength of mind, such a tank armada was stopped. It's not for you to drive two divisions of the Fritzes around the dunes with a lunch break, and then present it as the largest battle of 2 MV on a par with Stalingrad.

    !!!
    1. +2
      6 March 2015 17: 14
      Quote: Denis Scythian M2.0
      Quote: sannych
      Yes, it was a meat grinder. All the same, our grandfathers were truly heroes in strength of mind, such a tank armada was stopped. It's not for you to drive two divisions of the Fritzes around the dunes with a lunch break, and then present it as the largest battle of 2 MV on a par with Stalingrad.

      !!!
      Mikhail Lermontov
      BORODINO

      - Tell me, uncle, it's not for nothing
      Moscow, burned by fire,
      The Frenchman is given away?
      After all, there were fighting fights,
      Yes, they say, even what!
      No wonder the whole of Russia remembers
      About Borodin's day!
      - Yes, there were people nowadays,
      Not that the present tribe:
      Heroes - not you!
      They got a bad share:
      Few came back from the field ...
      If it were not for the Lord's will,
      They would not give up Moscow!
  3. +6
    6 March 2015 10: 50
    for a week almost 100 to the dead, uzhs.
  4. +12
    6 March 2015 11: 00
    Huge battle. The German armored fist has always been exceptionally solid and durable. if it were not for the advance preparation and supply of reserves, we would be rolled out as at the beginning of the war. BUT 1945 is not 1941. Experience, reserves, and most importantly the ability to fight.
    1. xan
      +5
      6 March 2015 15: 24
      Losses are almost one to one. Our losses in tanks are not shown, they were obviously serious. Almost everywhere, the infantry from the artillery cover threw positions and retreated, after the battle they even created a commission to clarify this shameful fact - the extremely low resistance of the infantry. The conclusion of the commission is the insufficient preparation and poor willful state of draftees from the occupied territories. Although, if they had not fled, maybe there would have been more losses, as in the Kursk Bulge. The battle was won by pt-artillery and tankers, because they were seriously prepared. The gunners did not care about infantry cover, the calculations in the students drove captured German machine guns with a serious supply of ammunition, and did not throw their guns when they fell into the semicircle and surroundings. And we must always remember that our tank and anti-tank guns did not take Panthers and Tigers into the forehead, and the Germans calmly pierced our tanks, and also from the tank guns.
      1. +2
        6 March 2015 21: 35
        "And we must always remember that our tank and anti-tank guns did not take the Panthers and Tigers in the forehead, while the Germans calmly penetrated our tanks, and from the PT-guns too." What specific weapons did not the "Panthers" and "Tigers" take in the forehead? Cannons IS-2, SU-100? ZIS-2, ZIS-3? ZIS-S-53?
        1. xan
          -7
          7 March 2015 10: 49
          Quote: Klos
          What specific weapons did not the "Panthers" and "Tigers" take in the forehead? Cannons IS-2, SU-100? ZIS-2, ZIS-3? ZIS-S-53?

          Only one IS-2 tank had armor protection, which made it possible to hope for victory in a duel situation with the Tiger, but the Tiger had a faster-firing gun and better sights. All our other tanks and SU in a duel situation with the Germans had a less chance in advance because of the excellent tank guns of the Germans and the armor of the Panthers, Tigers and Marders, which in total was much more than the IS-2. And the T-34-85 improved the situation, but did not equalize it. According to statistics, our offensive lost five times more tanks than the Germans, until the end of the war. And at Balaton, the Germans had 900 of their own against 500 of ours, began to advance and almost won.
          1. +1
            9 March 2015 19: 14
            No one denies the high combat qualities of German armored vehicles. The higher is the significance of victory over a strong enemy, which, undoubtedly, were German tankers. However, I consider stupid the opinion of the total superiority of German tanks over domestic equipment. It could not be in principle in 1945. After all, the strength of the tank units lies not only in the strength of the guns and the thickness of the armor, but also from the operational characteristics, and, most importantly, the people sitting in the combat vehicles. And the statistics ... It is clear that each side will customize it for itself.
            1. -1
              9 March 2015 21: 01
              After all, the strength of the tank units is not only the strength of the guns and the thickness of the armor, but also consists of operational characteristics, and, most importantly, people sitting in combat vehicles. - Long live the great and mighty!
              1. 0
                12 March 2015 17: 34
                Rather, the strength of the tank units depends on the competent tactical use of any type of tanks, with any crews and characteristics. And no super armor and megapush can help tank aces if their opponents have long passed a neighboring ravine and crushed fuel and lubricant depots in the rear ...
      2. +8
        6 March 2015 21: 55
        Quote: xan
        And we must always remember that our tank and anti-tank guns did not take Panthers and Tigers into the forehead, and the Germans calmly pierced our tanks, and also from the tank guns.

        Some superficial comparison. I would say amateurish ...
        On the one hand, both Pak-40 and Pak-42 penetrated T-1's frontal armor from a distance of 75 km. As well as 88 and XNUMX tank guns "Panthers" and "Tigers", as well as self-propelled guns with the same guns.
        But do not forget who attacked and who stood on the defensive.
        At the same time, the SU-100 was hit by the same Panthers and Tigers starting from a distance of 1000 m.
        SU-85 as well as T-34-85 also did not allow themselves to be offended.
        The main anti-tank gun was a 45 mm anti-tank gun. Yes ... the caliber is too small. But do not think that in the advancing orders of the armored fist of the Germans there were no worthy targets for them, for example, enemy self-propelled guns. And the Pz-4 was not that "booked" either.
        And finally. The Battle of Balaton was the first massive use of the BS-3. Mounted in prepared positions, these guns inflicted significant damage to the Panzerwaffe.
        IPTAP was created just for such "panzer-surprises".
        The lessons of the battles on the Oryol-Kursk Bulge were not in vain.
        1. xan
          -1
          7 March 2015 10: 31
          Quote: stalkerwalker
          The main anti-tank gun was a 45 mm anti-tank gun. Yes ... the caliber is too small. But do not think that in the advancing orders of the armored fist of the Germans there were no worthy targets for them, for example, enemy self-propelled guns. And the Pz-4 was not that "booked" either.
          And finally. The Battle of Balaton was the first massive use of the BS-3. Mounted in prepared positions, these guns inflicted significant damage to the Panzerwaffe.

          That’s all right, gentlemen, non-amateurs, but how then can one explain the indisputable fact that the Germans, having practically no advantage in the troops, calmly went on the offensive and strained the Soviet Army so that they almost achieved their results?
          And if we take our offensives, then not one has begun with such correlations of forces as the German one near Balaton. The Germans kept the front without any problems, having almost half the number of tanks and soldiers on the defensive.
          If the situation at Balaton were mirrored, ours wouldn’t dare to advance in life. And this can not be explained by anything other than tactical anti-tank defense, built on the use of more advanced anti-tank and tank guns for a less perfect tank defense of the SA.
          1. +3
            7 March 2015 10: 36
            Quote: xan
            That’s all right, gentlemen, non-amateurs, but how then can one explain the indisputable fact that the Germans, having practically no advantage in the troops, calmly went on the offensive and strained the Soviet Army so that they almost achieved their results?

            Have you read the article? Or so ... to rant?
            Thus, the Germans and Hungarians had a slight advantage in the number of infantry; the Red Army had a slight advantage in artillery and aircraft. But the Germans had more than double superiority in tanks and self-propelled guns and placed their main hope in them..
            1. xan
              0
              7 March 2015 19: 54
              Quote: stalkerwalker

              Have you read the article? Or so ... to rant?

              Clearly, I see you read, but did not understand.
              Quote: xan
              If the situation at Balaton were mirrored, ours wouldn’t dare to advance in life.

              This phrase of mine from the previous post is confirmed by all offensives and defenses in the years 44-45. I repeat once again for the gifted: German anti-tank defense is more effective than ours. This is expressed in the fact that one German weapon knocks out more tanks in comparison with our weapon, etc. And even our superiority in large-caliber artillery and aviation did not change these statistics. This is explained by the fact that German cannons on our tanks were technically more effective than our cannons on German tanks. Our pt-gunners were much more vulnerable than the German pt-gunners, they had to shoot on the sides of the Panthers and Tigers, while the Germans hit our T-34s and dryers in the forehead. Why argue with this, this is a simple statement of fact, confirmed by military history.
          2. 0
            9 March 2015 19: 18
            What is the Soviet Army in 1945? Learn History
      3. +6
        6 March 2015 22: 23
        Quote: xan
        The conclusion of the commission is the insufficient preparation and poor willful state of draftees from the occupied territories.

        Father was a participant in the battles near Balaton. Infantry. He once said (back in Soviet times) that our soldiers were worn out before these battles and did not manage to catch up with the rear. There was an elementary lack of ammunition. I have no reason not to believe him.
        PS Sometimes I regret that as a young man I did not ask my father much about that time, and my father did not like to talk about the war.
        People. Don’t forget and love your parents. They are the departing and departed our history. And they loved us.
  5. +4
    6 March 2015 12: 26
    there is no place for the Nazis on the planet, and even more so on Russian land! soldier
  6. yur58
    +5
    6 March 2015 13: 41
    Eternal glory to the heroes of our country who destroyed the fascist reptile.
  7. +6
    6 March 2015 16: 12
    And Grandpa participated in this battle, ІІІ Ukrainian Front!
  8. +14
    6 March 2015 16: 35
    And Grandpa participated in this battle, ІІІ Ukrainian Front! He told.
    KIRILL ALEXANDROV GEORGIEV
    ETERNAL GLORY TO HEROES !!
  9. +9
    6 March 2015 19: 27
    In the 80s, I had to be with a number of generals at Lake Balaton. My Hungarian comrades and I were choosing the location for the base stations of the Tropic RSDN chain. When visiting Szekesfehervar, I asked the Hungarian generals about the battle described in the article. Sincerely the Hungarian comrades confirmed that the losses of the Nazis and the Hungarians were enormous. And they are sorry that the Hungarian leadership of that period linked their fate with the Nazis. And here again history repeats. Hungary supports the US sanctions against our country and connects its fate with the Nazis.
    And then we created a chain such that without hindrance on digital maps at low altitudes, our aircraft could reach any targets in Western Europe. Hungarian generals were sincerely with us and we were doing one thing.
    Two traitors Gorbachev and Yeltsin all crossed out that our fathers defended. I have the honor.
  10. wist
    +7
    6 March 2015 21: 31
    Great video on this topic from WoT!
  11. 0
    8 March 2015 13: 36
    Bulgarian and Soviet troops, supported by Soviet forces

    It would be nice to edit the sentence.
  12. 0
    9 March 2015 15: 37
    Nothing has been written about Uhu night vision!
  13. 0
    9 March 2015 15: 55
    The most incomprehensible: why did Hitler even launch an offensive in Hungary?

    Soviet troops are advancing in a straight line to Berlin. Look on the map: where is Berlin, and where is Balaton?
    And Hitler throws selected parts of the Waffen-SS with the latest technology completely from the side.
    Where they die: back to the capital no longer break through.
    As a result, Berlin is defended by second-rate soldiers of the Wehrmacht, Volksturm
    and the Hitler Jugend brigade. And the rest of the elite troops dies in Hungary.

    It seems that the Fuehrer really hoped to the last for some incomprehensible "miracle".
    Directly according to conspiracy theories ... Either hoped for aliens, or
    atomic bomb.
  14. 1z1961gjgjd
    0
    12 March 2015 00: 28
    Many comments are untrue: the 45mm anti-tank missile was removed from armament in 1944 and shells for it were simply not delivered or produced. The Tiger's rate of fire did reach 8 rounds per minute ON THE FIELD, in real battles 3-4, the IS's rate of fire was -2 shots, but thanks to its 122 mm cannon it stood in service until 90. T-34-85 began to produce in 1944 and there were not enough of them, and 76 mm were powerless against the Tigers and Panthers, except that they could incapacitate the gun and kill the tracks.
  15. 0
    12 March 2015 16: 40
    Quote: 1z1961gjgjd
    T-34-85 began to produce in 1944 and there were not enough of them, and 76 mm were powerless against the Tigers and Panthers, except that they could incapacitate the gun and kill the tracks.

    I would like to know how many T-34-76 and T-34-85 were in service with the Red Army in 1945. As for the 76 mm guns - for sure everything depended on the distance of the shot and the type of ammunition used.
    1. -1
      12 March 2015 16: 44
      18.07.1943 06.09.1943 10.11.1943 29.02.1944 14.07.1944 01.1945 16.04.1945
      T-34 461 450 420 308 323 22 13
      T-34/85 604 417
      The table was shot down, but as part of 3 TAs, the replacement of t34 from 76 mm to t34 from 85 mm, judging by it, occurred completely by January 1945.
      In December 1943, the first T-34-85s were successfully built and preparations for their serial production began. In mid-1944, the transition process from T-34 to T-34-85 was completed at all plants involved in this plant, except for ChKZ and UZTM. The first was completely refocused on the release of new heavy IS tanks and self-propelled artillery mounts of the ISU series, and the second also stopped the production of “thirty-fours” in 1943 in favor of increasing the production of self-propelled guns based on them.
      Table 1. General release of T-34-85
      Year 1944 1945 Total
      T-34-85 10 499 12 110 22 609
      T-34-85 commander 134 140 274
      OT-34-85 30 301 331
      Total 10 663 12 551 23 214
      Table 2. Production of T-34-85 by NKTP plants
      Plant 1944 1945 1946 Total
      No. 183 6 585 7 356
      No. 112 3 062 3 255
      No. 174 1 000 1 940
      Total 10 647 12 551 2 701 25 899
  16. 0
    12 March 2015 16: 45
    And in general, one gets the impression that the Germans were completely armed with "impenetrable" "Tigers" and "Panthers". But this is not so ...
  17. 0
    12 March 2015 18: 16
    For 9 days, from March 6 to March 15, the loss of Our 45 thousand. Eternal Memory to Heroes! Eternal Glory! And before the Victory another two months.