Designer "flying ships". Genius and tragedy of Rostislav Alekseev

21
The nightmare of the American admirals

Group of american ships fleet led by an aircraft carrier carries out military service in the oceans. Radars do not detect any threats, and calmness reigns on American ships. It is disrupted by the sudden visual detection of a target on the horizon - either a ship rushing at incredible speed, or an airplane literally gliding over the surface.

An unidentified target in the eyes grows into a huge "flying ship". An alarm has been declared on the aircraft carrier, but late - a “stranger” performs a missile volley, and after a few dozen seconds the pride of the fleet, engulfed in fires and torn to pieces, goes to the bottom. And the last thing that dying sailors see in their lives is the rapidly shadowing shadow of an unknown and terrible enemy.

These or similar nightmares tormented at night the American military leaders who had information about the secret weapons USSR - shock ekranoplan "Lun" project 903.

Designer "flying ships". Genius and tragedy of Rostislav Alekseev

Ekranoplan "Lun", Kaspiysk, 2010 year. Photo: Commons.wikimedia.org/ Fred Schaerli


An ekranoplan longer than 73 meters and almost 20 meters in height could travel at speeds up to 500 km per hour above the water surface at an altitude of about 4 meters. It was armed with anti-ship missiles "Mosquito", which allowed the enemy ships to inflict maximum damage. "Lun" got the nickname "aircraft carrier killer."

An amazing combat vehicle was developed at the Rostislav Alekseev Design Bureau, a Soviet designer, whose designs revolutionized shipbuilding.

Chasing speed

Rostislav Alekseev was born on December 18 on 1916 in the city of Novozybkov, Chernihiv Province, in the family of a teacher and agronomist. In 1935, Rostislav entered the Gorky Industrial Institute named after Zhdanov in the shipbuilding department.


Rostislav Alekseev. Photo: RIA News/ Galina Kmit


In his student years, the future shipbuilder was fond of sailing. The young man thought about how to increase the speed of movement on the water.

At the very beginning of the era aviation pilots and designers drew attention to the so-called screen effect - a sharp increase in the wing lift and other aerodynamic characteristics of the aircraft when flying near the shielding surface (water, earth, etc.).

Engineers were looking for ways to use this effect in practice.

Rostislav Alekseev came to the conclusion that the way to increase the speed of movement on the surface of the water lies in reducing the area of ​​contact of the vessel with the aquatic environment.

He started a young designer with the idea of ​​a hydrofoil ship. Such a ship was for Alekseev the theme of his graduation project, which he defended in 1941.

The defense, held in July 1941, took place behind closed doors. The theme of the project Alekseev in the conditions of the outbreak of the war was more than relevant - “Speedboat with hydrofoils”. The idea of ​​a high-speed combat boat for the needs of the Soviet Navy was highly appreciated.

The young engineer was sent to the Krasnoye Sormovo plant, where in 1942, Alekseev received premises and specialists to work on building combat boats on lightly submerged hydrofoils.

Alekseev did not have time to create unique combat boats before the end of the war, but his models were recognized as very promising. The work of the designer and his subordinates in 1951 was marked with the Stalin Prize of the second degree.


Hydrofoil "Petrel". Photo: Commons.wikimedia.org


"Rocket", conquered the world

In 1951, the military workings of the young designer are transformed for the needs of civil shipbuilding. Alekseeva Design Bureau begins work on a passenger hovercraft, known as the “Rocket”.

The first “Rocket” was presented in Moscow during the World Festival of Youth and Students 1957 of the year. The passenger ship on hydrofoils, in its speed on its head surpassed all civilian ships that existed at that time, had the effect of a bombshell in the world.

"Missiles" have stepped far beyond the USSR. They were successfully exploited not only in the countries of the socialist camp, but also, so to speak, "in the lair of the enemy." Alekseev's ships confidently plowed the waters of Great Britain, Canada, Germany, Finland, etc.

Following the “Rocket”, other types of hydrofoil civilian ships were created, such as Volga, Meteor, Kometa, Sputnik, Burevestnik, Voskhod.

For this work, the team led by Rostislav Alekseev in 1962, was awarded the Lenin Prize.

"Caspian Monster"

But the designer did not think to rest on his laurels. Having fully implemented the idea of ​​hydrofoil vessels, Alekseev proceeds to work on ekranoplans - ships hovering above the water surface.

In 1962, the Alekseev Design Bureau began work on the KM (a mock ship) project. “KM” had really gigantic dimensions - the wingspan of 37,6 m, length of 92 m, maximum take-off weight of 544 tons. Before the appearance of the An-225 “Mriya” aircraft, it was the heaviest aircraft in the world.

Western experts, having received a snapshot of the experimental model, called it the "Caspian monster" (the tests were held in the Caspian Sea).

His first flight "Caspian monster" made 18 October 1966 year. He was piloted by two pilots, one of whom was Rostislav Alekseev himself. The flight was successful.


"Caspian Monster". Photo: Frame youtube.com


Tests "KM" continued for 15 years. The new “flying ship” had a lot of advantages, however, there were enough flaws. In fact, "KM" opened up a completely new direction on the border of aviation and navigation, which still had to develop its own laws and rules.

"Frontier" position of wig affected their prospects in the most disastrous way. The Air Force believed it was a ship, and the shipbuilders were convinced that we were talking about an airplane. Alekseev, with his unusual project, caused irritation among officials who advocated the classic forms of shipbuilding development.

Alekseev’s chief curator of the Soviet defense industry, and later USSR Defense Minister Dmitry Ustinov, saved the project from complete closure.

"Orlyonok" and opal

In addition to official obstacles, there were problems with ekranoplan pilots. Pilots were extremely difficult to get used to pilotage, passing over the surface of the water. The special features of the WIG are such that it is almost impossible to “drop” it into the water during horizontal flight, even if you release the steering wheel altogether. However, professional habits of pilots were often forced to ekranoplan up, bringing it "off the screen," which caused accidents.

Each new failure was extremely painful both in the idea of ​​a ground-effect vehicle and the designer Alekseev himself. In the 1968 year, the design bureau, which was created by him, was divided into two - by hydrofoil vessels and ekranoplanes. For Alekseev left only the second direction.

At the beginning of the 1970-ies, the Ministry of Defense gave an order to Alekseev’s design bureau to develop an amphibious landing vehicle for the Navy, which was given the code name "Orlyonok". In 1974, officials from Moscow literally forced Alekseev to bring another “raw” Orlyonok to sea trials even before receiving the results of a static body inspection. The result of this was the separation of the tail section of the hull during the tests. Alekseev, who traditionally drove his brainchild in his first flight, managed to safely return the Orlyonok to the base. No one was hurt, but Alekseev himself was punished to the fullest — he was removed from the development of the Orlyonok, transferred to the position of head of the advanced planning department.


Ekranoplan "Eaglet". Photo: Commons.wikimedia.org


Despite this, the detached designer almost underground continued to participate in the work on the landing ground-winged ekranoplane. In 1979, the "Orlyonok" was adopted by the Soviet Navy. This amphibious landing craft could take off at wave heights up to 2 meters and reach speeds of 400 – 500 km / h. Having taken on board up to 200 marines with full armament or two combat vehicles (tank, armored personnel carrier, infantry fighting vehicles), the Orlyonok could transfer them to a distance of 1500 km.

The designer killed his brainchild

In total, three combat "Orlyonok" were created, on their base the 11-I separate air group directly subordinate to the General Staff of naval aviation was formed. This series was to be the installation, but only in the Navy of the USSR was to join the military service 120 amphibious airplanes.

Despite the disgrace, Alekseev continued to work a lot - there were tests of the passenger wig, the development of a shock model armed with rockets continued ...

In January, the 1980 of the year in Chkalovsk was testing the passenger model of an airplane. His assistants cleared the ice block and said that the model could be released. What exactly happened at that moment is not certain. But Alekseev somehow assumed the weight of the 800-kilogram apparatus.

At first, it seemed that this incident did not affect the health of the 63-year-old designer - Alekseev successfully completed the test day. But the next morning, he began to complain of pain in his side. Doctors initially found it difficult to diagnose. So two more days passed, after which Alekseev fainted. During the emergency operation, the doctors found that the designer had been injured during the incident at the test - something that is commonly referred to in the people as “overstrained”. Over the past days has developed peritonitis. The doctors had to perform three operations and seemed to cope with the disaster. But complications began, and 9 February 1980, Rostislav Evgenievich Alekseev was gone.

Past and Future

The Lun impact ekranoplan, the design of which belonged to Alekseev, was launched in the summer of 1986, and in 1991, was officially accepted into service, becoming part of the Caspian Flotilla.

"Lun" remained the only impact wig of the Navy, first in the USSR and then in Russia. After the death of Dmitry Ustinov in 1984, his successor as Minister of Defense of the USSR, Sergei Sokolov, curtailed the program of building military E-wig, considering this type of weapon unpromising. And when, with the collapse of the Soviet Union, the Russian army was covered with total lack of money, Rostislav Alekseev’s revolutionary ideas were completely forgotten.

In 2007, the wig was finally written off from the Navy. At the same time, the most surviving instance of the landing Eaglet was towed down the Volga to Moscow, where it was installed in the Navy Museum.

The debate about whether the WIG has a future in the 21st century continues to this day. During the disputes, it became imperceptibly revealed that the fighting small-scale ekranoplans appeared in service with Iran and China. The Chinese soon intend to introduce a ground-winged wig, designed for 200 marines.

What does Russia need?

In Russia, work is currently underway on passenger small-displacement ekranoplanes, and the ideas of creating military vehicles of this type stumble upon the same resistance of officials of different ranks as they did during Rostislav Alekseev’s lifetime.

That's what a strange thing it turns out - in our country billions are easily allocated to buy Mistral helicopter carriers from France, and their own unique developments are just as easily sent to the basket or buried by endless approvals.

But only with reliance on our ideas and on our working hands can we guarantee the independence of the country.

And Rostislav Evgenievich Alekseev understood this like no other.
21 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Herr tur
    0
    20 December 2014 06: 46
    The ekranoplanes Eaglet and Lun are convenient for a sudden attack of the coastal bases of a particular enemy because of the fast flight at ultra-low altitude - that is, they are devices with a narrow specialization and 1 time, and they are trying to present them as transport, rescuers, cruiser against an aircraft carrier ... in these applications they lose to flying boats and land aircraft.
    1. Herr tur
      +1
      20 December 2014 14: 09
      Since the minuses are without arguments, I will develop the topic a little - for the same tasks, Hughes' Spruce Goose was made - an advanced analogue of the Messerschmitt transport worker. An approach with a tank and an assault company to a certain shore and their quick landing. If the device falls apart, then the paratroopers will have firewood - the plane was deliberately made with piston engines at the beginning of the jet era and made of wood in the era of all-metal ones - there was practically no chance of quietly unloading and flying away, so the crew was only 3 people. The version about the replacement of dry cargo ships by Gusami on the convoy routes is completely unrealistic.
      Since this war was canceled, the Geese were not needed, as then the ekranoplanes.
  2. From the profession22222
    +2
    20 December 2014 07: 21
    That's what a strange thing it turns out - in our country billions are easily allocated to buy Mistral helicopter carriers from France, and their own unique developments are just as easily sent to the basket or buried by endless approvals.


    How much pathetics! And honestly religion forbids writing that the same Looney has no tasks in the form in which it existed. Unlike the same Mistral.

    The landing capabilities are more interesting, but in the present form ... Well, I see.

    Small ones - yes, they have and occupy their limited niche.

    By the way, there’s nothing to say about infrastructure - this is a mountain of dough. Private trader will not pull.
    And the state has more interesting tasks, not the bottomless bins of the motherland.

    I do not diminish the genius of Alekseev, but his ideas were already ahead of his time.
    1. +3
      20 December 2014 20: 55
      Quote: Ametist22222
      And honestly, religion forbids that the same Looney has no tasks in the form in which it existed

      Enough already to carry the blizzard, tasks are set as threats arise; the Luns had and have tasks.
      The fact that he is complex and eats a lot, well, I think no more than an aircraft carrier group, then that it is easy to hit him is just a flood, even funny to comment on, any air defense officer will say how "easy" to lead a target in conditions of massive field illumination from interference, which is exactly looks like the sea, the SDC easily sends all NACH, DOESN'T HAVE GOALS AT THE SEA LEVEL with such a level of interference, hit it from a fighter-and get back in the return line is not good? Place even a marine "shell" - (I forgot what the modern version is called) on such a size - yes, send two bytes laughing , then modern anti-ship missiles significantly decreased in size, and it was also possible to make some parts of the airframe from composites, and they are oddly lighter than aluminum alloys by 1.6 times, a trifle, of course, it’s nice to realize that the new version will be 1) using modern composites it will be much easier, but it will be more economical
      2) will carry modern air defense and electronic warfare
      3) will carry modern anti-ship missiles and long-range missiles
      4) to reduce ...... laughing
      1. -1
        21 December 2014 12: 24
        The removal of Alekseev from his subject, which led to his death, once again showed how much we are controlled by those whom we consider our adversary. Wing before hypersonic times were the only way to effectively destroy aircraft carrier groups, and do it for little money. The explanations above are 100% correct, probably it should be added that with the development of this technology, it would begin to be actively exported, and this would greatly change the nature of the wars of the last two decades, in which the United States would lose its advantage at sea over countries that do not have strong fleets. By the way, it is possible to hit a fighter if it, the fighter, takes off from that very deck, and with what excitement can it fly up and with what excitement can the ekranoplan fly?
  3. +5
    20 December 2014 12: 39
    did not want to offend those who unsubscribed, but! the truth is more expensive: the article is a plus unambiguously. and second: I had a conversation with a real pro on ships (I myself am a tovarishsh tree, and this is putting it mildly), and so here is his summary: we don't fucking need all these Mistrals! having in the fleet two dozen "Lunes" can be safely put on the entire aircraft carrier squadron of the SGA. and even this is well understood by the PI .. Dosy! and that's why there are comments on the forum, similar to the previous ones, they say we don't need such ships, but we need Mistrals! but not the commentators from the command of the Baba battalion of mister Stouretkin? judging by the ranks - from there. feel
    1. From the profession22222
      +3
      20 December 2014 15: 40
      Not being a real pro, I will ask philistine questions:

      The pros didn’t tell, by chance, the difference between the docking ship and the strike ekranoplan? Their tasks? (I suspect they were discussed)
      Did he not say that Ivan Gren can’t finish building, although the bookmark was in 2004, 10 (ten years !!!) ago?
      Did he not talk about the traditional weak spot of the Russian fleet, since the times of the USSR - BDK?
      Did the pros tell you what to do with cruises with gifts to Syria? The same BDK Nikolai Filchenkov has been in service since 75, and soon will be a solid anniversary. Tudy-syudy still drives, devouring a precious resource.
      And the fact that the military Mistral is being built using civilian technologies as a turnkey designer for 30 months, did the pros mention?
      Did he say something about Zenith-9?
      Did you mention technology transfer?

      We are fighting for Syria here, we are defending our allies and our interests, but no. All this is too small, and a boring routine .... But to fight with aircraft carriers - yes, it’s breathtaking (what for, by the way, for this ekranoplanes? We build ash trees for good reason, plus we upgrade Anthei, plus Pike-B still Incidentally, I really want to find out from the pros, and who will give target designation to missiles for attacking aircraft carriers? I will tactfully keep silent about economics and other things, as well as about the not very successful experience of operating them in the Soviets. Or maybe they weren’t built just because of Alekseev’s disgrace? Ohhh, that’s not even at all).
      1. 0
        20 December 2014 20: 35
        Quote: Ametist22222
        Not being a real pro, I will ask philistine questions:

        In this thread, your remarks are destructive flood
        1. From the profession22222
          0
          20 December 2014 20: 49
          Quote: Locksmith
          In this thread, your remarks are destructive flood

          Do not answer - throw the slogan! By the way, how is the weather in Kiev?
    2. From the profession22222
      -1
      20 December 2014 15: 51
      Quote: Victor Demchenko
      having in the fleet two dozen "Lunes" can be safely put on the entire aircraft carrier squadron of the SGA. and even this is well understood by the PI .. Dosy! and that's why there are comments on the forum, similar to the previous ones, they say we don't need such ships, but we need Mistrals! and not the commentators from the command of the Baba battalion of mister Stouretkin? judging by the ranks - from there. feel

      Siriusli? A little more - how can mosquitoes sink a carrier? Well, at least approach the launch range - how?
      1. +1
        20 December 2014 20: 34
        Quote: Ametist22222
        Well, at least approach the launch range - how?

        The Americans answered this question quite specifically: the target launched towards their illustrious Aegis stopped ... exactly inside the ship, without comment. wink
        1. From the profession22222
          0
          20 December 2014 20: 55
          The answer is, will we all blame everything on the BQM-74? The fact that the Americans showed kaku liquid is not the answer. Mosquito how to drown will AUG?
  4. pahom54
    +2
    20 December 2014 12: 48
    "This is what a strange thing turns out - in our country billions are easily allocated to buy Mistral helicopter carriers from France, and their own unique developments are just as easily sent to the basket or buried through endless approvals" ...

    Unfortunately, for Russia, such things - from time immemorial - as a rule ... Very often, the inventions of our talented people were sent, to put it mildly, under the cloth ...
    Now there would really be a dozen such Moons and with modern missile weapons - they would not have a price ...
  5. +4
    20 December 2014 12: 55
    A forgotten and unexplored topic. There are few ideological specialists left who could tell in detail on this issue.
    As can be seen from the comments.
    Nobody really knows anything ...
    If you know or love this direction write))
  6. +4
    20 December 2014 13: 24
    I do not quite understand the causal relationship between the article and the comments. A helicopter command post will never replace an amphibious ekranoplan, just like an ekranoplan will not replace a Mistral. These are different ships with their own profiling tasks. I will make my own considerations, in my opinion, the ekranoplan \ the ekranolet is extremely promising in the form of strike (anti-ship) platforms in the waters of inland seas with complex sailing (Baltic, especially the Caspian). Yes, this is a rather highly specialized ship that needs a good anti-ship missile, given the development trends of the latter (hypersonic), such products will be somewhat heavy for aviation , and the defensive potential of ships of the corvette / frigate type (the main ones in such water areas) does not allow them to assign such a task to them. That is, the functions of the main strike component of the fleet. The statement of some readers about the high cost of infrastructure (???) is puzzling. the cost of infrastructure is calculated from the displacement.
    1. 0
      20 December 2014 14: 04
      Quote: Argon
      I do not quite understand the causal relationship between the article and the comments. A helicopter command post will never replace an amphibious ekranoplan, just like an ekranoplan will not replace a Mistral. These are different ships with their own profiling tasks. I will make my own considerations, in my opinion, the ekranoplan \ the ekranolet is extremely promising in the form of strike (anti-ship) platforms in the waters of inland seas with complex sailing (Baltic, especially the Caspian). Yes, this is a rather highly specialized ship that needs a good anti-ship missile, given the development trends of the latter (hypersonic), such products will be somewhat heavy for aviation , and the defensive potential of ships of the corvette / frigate type (the main ones in such water areas) does not allow them to assign such a task to them. That is, the functions of the main strike component of the fleet. The statement of some readers about the high cost of infrastructure (???) is puzzling. the cost of infrastructure is calculated from the displacement.

      I will add a little.
      WIG is convenient to use along traditional Russian roads i.e. rivers at any time of the year. And there are steppes and tundra. This is for civilian use.
      For the military: replacement of the Republic of Kazakhstan and MDK + rescuers. And not only the Caspian Sea, but also all rivers, the Black and Baltic Seas. Upon reaching the range and seaworthiness (it is necessary to work together with the control unit), these will be ocean delivery vehicles.
      When using normal engines, ekranoplans are cheaper than aviation, but more expensive than traditional barges.
      The problem was and remains: who will pick himself up.
      Let Rogozin grab him (until he steals a little (at least he hasn’t noticed)) equals Pogosyan (it’s time to remove this freak, let him deal with his own planes, otherwise it turns out like during WWII with Yakovlev)
  7. +2
    20 December 2014 13: 28
    Not mentioned by US-055 and
    Small hydrofoil rocket ship "Falcon". 1987 of the USSR.
    Length - 50 m; displacement - 475 t; power of gas turbines - 40 000 l. with; speed - more than 50 nodes (oklo 92,6 km / h); armament 2 automatic guns (caliber 76 mm and six-barrel caliber 30 mm), 2 four-tube torpedo tubes or 2 anti-submarine missile launchers "Medvedka".
  8. 0
    20 December 2014 13: 41
    The Chinese then also decided to taste this cactus. It will be interesting to see what they do.
  9. +1
    20 December 2014 14: 26
    a flying ship - nobody would have believed such a thing before, that's what aerodynamics means
  10. +4
    20 December 2014 16: 41
    there is a good word - costs, fierce corrosion of aircraft engines, a small amount of cargo, etc. It was removed in 1984 when Gorbachev was not yet ...
    A few pieces for specific purposes - nothing more
  11. +3
    20 December 2014 19: 34
    Such or about such nightmares were tortured at night by American commanders who had information about the USSR’s secret weapon - the X-gun 903 project Eunoplane.

    Tortured, yes. Because it was possible to detect an ekranoplane in those days when floppy disks were large and monitors small, but there was nothing to hit. For cruise missiles, in principle, could not aim at a target having a speed of 500-600 km / h., And the fighter missiles (and air defense systems) could not catch a target at such a low altitude.
    There is only one maaaalenky nuance. Ever since, missiles and SDs have learned to target the enemy at ultralow. And because killing ekranoplanes / ekranoletov now is no more difficult than the destruction of a conventional aircraft
    1. +2
      20 December 2014 22: 56
      And why, dear Andrey, you are comparing the process of "killing" with an aircraft, and not with RTOs based on SNP. On closer examination, there are not many tools for countering a target such as "ekranoplan". And in fact, there are only two aircraft and squadron complexes PVIKO like the same "IJIS". The main (but not the only) means of protecting the ekranoplan / summer is its operational maneuverability (suddenness of appearance), the corresponding reaction speed is possessed by aviation, but its use is associated with the need to have a certain quantitative potential (patrolling will have to be done over rather large areas). rather powerful military groupings that all countries of the basins of closed seas have. It is necessary to form sentinel groups, cover groups, refueling. There is no ASP to destroy ekranoplanes, all existing ones have insufficient warhead power (this is at least, but the same "Lun" apparatus is not small) Phys the signature of the ekranoplan is smaller than the displacement ship having a similar complex arms, and at the same time smaller aircraft of similar size. I'm not talking about the complex of passive protection-armor, etc. (we are not considering a specific ship). And most importantly: I do not see any particular obstacles in equipping ekranoplanes with air defense and electronic warfare systems ( given the high weight return of the airframe, it is much easier to find the "masses" under the air defense system than in the PAK DA). Regarding the PRiKO squadron systems, the cost of their use is quite high (when equipping ekranoplanes with anti-ship missiles of the appropriate range, efficiency), their potential will be saved to destroy the already launched joint ventures, .o. the carrier fired in time will be able to hide.
  12. +1
    20 December 2014 21: 10
    It is necessary, unnecessary, narrow specialization, etc., etc. The main thing is that from time to time there appear Russian nuggets, the most ingenious inventors, who, in addition to their direct activity, had and still have to overcome various obstacles and "barriers" with "slingshots" exposed by mediocrities and spiteful critics. How many Russian geniuses suffered from these "deeds".
  13. +2
    20 December 2014 22: 44
    All offer only two options for ekranoplanes - either amphibious assault, or combat with AUG. All pros and cons are voiced. Well, if we propose a variant of a cruise missile carrier with a range of 10000 - 12000 km, i.e. so that he could fly up to the enemy's coast and shoot out where no one is waiting. Then the same AUG will not be busy in order to come closer to the Russian coast and attack objects, but will be forced to withdraw and defend their own coast. All euroPro will turn into a bunch of expensive junk, because. in any case will not be able to protect Europe from the Atlantic. Plus, one more thing. In fact, Russia does not have its own naval bases abroad. Calling Tartus and Cam Ranh bases - the language does not turn. Accordingly, a warship with a large range is needed, which would be able to move from the Russian shores to the conflict area in a relatively short time. I think that the ekranoplan will be able to cope with this task.
    1. 0
      21 December 2014 02: 29
      Everything would be fine, but the fuel of the ekranole eats much more than an airplane, this is due to the large air resistance at the surface. Airplanes save fuel by flying higher, where drag is lower. And bombers with the task of launching cruise missiles are already doing pretty well.
      With the landing of troops, the idea is much more interesting, high speed, large carrying capacity, powerful weapons. Of course, not to send landing forces to Syria, but for the Northern Fleet, the Pacific Fleet this is a "topic" ... the ability to quickly jump, unleash a flurry of fire on the shore, land a half of a battalion of marines and a couple of tanks from a monster, cover the airborne air defense assault, seize a bridgehead and wait the approach of the main landing group on traditional landing ships of the same Mistrals.
      1. +1
        21 December 2014 07: 05
        I don’t understand what ?! Mahina "Eaglet" flies on one NK-12 and Il-76s carry four turbojet engines. The Il-76 carries only the lift of the wing. In an ekranoplan, this component is auxiliary, it is added to the holding force of the "screen". fool
  14. +2
    21 December 2014 08: 15
    You are all strange - win, not win, needed, not needed. Read the beginning of the article: they wanted a high-speed combat boat, got a high-speed vehicle, and very competitive (Alekseev’s ships confidently plowed the waters of Great Britain, Canada, Germany, Finland, etc.). WIG at a speed close to the plane is about 4 times more economical than the plane. Would you like to hang out on a classic ship for a week, enjoying the view (360 degree horizon), and vomiting from pitching - everything is at your service. But do not want to - a ticket for ekranoplan and alga (forward).