Artillery systems - faster, easier, stronger

22
Artillery systems - faster, easier, stronger
Ultrafine field howitzer UFH (Ultralightweight Field Howitzer), designated M777, is in service with the American army


The changing nature of conflicts raises questions about the future use of artillery. On the one hand, technological progress radically changes the possibilities, but at the same time, limited budgets contribute to a radical revision of the existing structure of the armed forces. On the one hand, the development of computer networks provides new opportunities, but at the same time creates potential vulnerabilities.

Achieving increased accuracy remains a top priority for artillery around the world. Precision capabilities brought to the artillery the most revolutionary changes. Effective implementation of these capabilities while reducing costs remains a top priority. Many countries seek to understand the future operational conditions in an era of asymmetrical combat, characterized mainly by counter-insurgency and the need to respond to an increasing number of small conflicts and civil wars throughout the world.

Comparison of receiver and rocket artillery

Unlike traditional artillery systems, the rocket does not create recoil forces during launch. With the exception of firing in a very small range of angles, barrel artillery, as a rule, must be somehow fixed in order to withstand the forces of recoil, otherwise the probability of damage to the suspension of a self-propelled artillery mount or even its tipping is great. In this position, the guns are still and cannot change their position so easily. Rocket artillery is much more mobile and can easily change position, making it difficult to target the platform. A rocket launcher can fire in motion, but rocket systems create a jet of gas that imposes its own limitations. Launchers can impersonate a jet of exhaust gas at launch, and their fire can damage their own or neighboring cars.

Although rocket artillery cannot compare with the accuracy and tempo of traditional artillery fire maintained for a long time, it can deliver a large mass of explosive at the same time, which thus increases the strike power and reduces the time required for taking cover. It also has a very strong smoke trace signature that indicates exactly where the fire is coming from. But since the volley takes quite a bit of time, the rocket launcher can quickly withdraw from the position.

The higher accuracy of the barrel artillery means that it can be used to fire the enemy near its troops. Together with its higher long-term firing ability, barreled artillery is better suited for defensive fire than rocket artillery, and it is also the only real system capable of conducting counter-battery fire. The use of precision-guided munitions without an accurate and responsive system for localizing targets and transferring information to the guns can lead to the destruction of an erroneous target and for a great price. Accurate target localization is the basis of high-precision preemptive fire, and it must fully utilize the capabilities of advanced precision-guided munitions.

US field artillery systems

The EXCALIBUR and the XM1156 Precision Guidance Kit (PGK) precision guidance kit are an integral part of the US Army ammunition modernization process. The first modified version of EXCALIBUR with improved characteristics, designated Blk Ia-1 (DA39), with a maximum range of 24 km was deployed in Iraq in May 2007, with the aim of improving the accuracy of artillery in this theater. A version of Blk Ia-2 (DA45) with a maximum range of 35 km was deployed in November 2010 of the year, and the Blk Ib version is scheduled to be deployed in 2014 year.




XM1156 Precision Guidance Kit (PGK) High Precision Guidance System



ATK PGK High Precision Guidance Kit with my subtitles

In May, the A and B batteries from the 2013 battalion of the 2 regiment of the US Army in Afghanistan received the XM15 Precision Guidance Kit (PGK) high-precision guidance kits from May. The screwed-on fuse turns standard 1156-mm howitzer shells into high-precision guided munitions for indirect fire. PGK improves the accuracy of artillery systems, thereby reducing civilian casualties, while the efficiency is the same as that of EXCALIBUR, but at a lower price. It allows the calculation of the field gun to “endow” with high-precision capabilities the projectiles used in the M155A155 PALADIN and M109A6 Lightweight 777-mm howitzers.

The PGK system is compatible with two standard artillery shells: the high-explosive M795 High Explosive and the active-reactive M549 / A1 Rocket Assisted Projectile. It uses a GPS receiver and small aerodynamic surfaces to obtain a more accurate projectile trajectory. When a projectile is flying along a GPS ballistic trajectory, the receiver provides the current coordinates of the projectile and the flight pattern. The system compares this data with the coordinates of the target. The handlebars are rotated for the purpose of small correction of the ballistic trajectory, which ultimately allows you to send a projectile along a more accurate trajectory. The first PGK shipments were completed by the end of June 2013, after training courses in Afghanistan in March of the same year. The M107 HE projectile will also be replaced by the practical 155-mm M1122 projectile. 155-mm XM1123 extended range infrared illumination and 155-mm XM1124 extended range visible light are being developed.

Radars in the modernization of artillery

As part of the strategy for upgrading the field artillery of the US Army up to 2020, the main target-detection radar for field artillery is expected to be the Lightweight Counter Mortar Radar light anti-vehicle radar AN / TPQ- mounted on the HMMWV and the AN / TPQ- 50 QRCR (Quick Reaction Capability Radar). AM / TPQ-53 provides the same capabilities as the former AN / TPQ-53 radar, but also reduces operating costs. It provides detection, identification and tracking of attacking shells and missiles in the 37 ° and 90 ° sectors. Its range is from 360 meters to 500 km. These radars provide all-view (60 °) detection in counter-battery fire and give a warning about attacking enemy missiles, artillery shells and mortar rounds. The deployment of the Q360 radar is scheduled for the beginning of 53 of the year, and the Q2014 radar for the end of 50. Of course, everything will depend on the end of the tests and the course of production.



AN / TPQ-50 LCMR radar (above) and AN / TPQ-53 QRCR radar (below)


The radar with automatic adjustment can be installed in 5 minutes, removed in 2 minutes, it is serviced by the calculation of 4 people. The radar is connected via digital tactical radio stations to the Advanced Field Artillery Tactical Data System (AFATDS) advanced tactical data transmission system for quick arming of fire missions.

The U.S. Army issued $ 81 million to Raytheon in July 2012 to develop and manufacture a new version of AFATDS. She will integrate and use information to create a common operational picture, starting from task planning and ending with its implementation. Its functions are coordination and control of military elements, providing close aviation support, ship fire, attack helicopters, offensive electronic warfare, field artillery and guided missiles. AFATDS provides automated operational control for the Fires Warfighting Function system used by the army, fleet and the US Marine Corps; More than 5000 of these systems are in operation worldwide. The new version of AFATDS 6.8X will also focus on improving and simplifying the user interface, while increasing the speed and expanding its capabilities.

JETS system

The JETS (Joint Effects Targeting System) advanced fire synchronization computer system is part of a new generation of handheld precision targeting devices (HHPTD) hand-held precision guidance devices. JETS is designed to enable advanced observers to accurately determine the coordinates of the target and effectively use high-precision ammunition without measuring the coordinates of the target (location measurement to determine the absolute latitude, longitude and pickup angle). JETS will allow advanced observers to recognize targets at ranges of 3000 meters by day and 1300 meters at night with sufficient accuracy (without measurement) for firing high-precision ammunition (10 meters error in determining the coordinates of the target at a distance of 2,5 km).


JETS manual device


The mass of the manual device of the JETS system will be no more than 2 kg; with it you can perform round-the-clock observation, detection and localization of targets. With the Target Location Designation System (TLDS) detection and targeting module, the JETS system is able to detect fixed targets at a distance of up to 5 km and moving targets on 3 km. Separate artillery units of the US Army will be equipped with a system for 2016 year.

AS90 and M777 guns

The 155-mm self-propelled gun AS90 along with the 105-mm light gun Light Gun is armed with six regiments of the British Royal Artillery. Each battery has four Fire Support Teams (FST) fire support groups and can accept up to six guns. Replacing the barrel with a 39 caliber length and a 52 caliber length increases the range to more than 40 km, and the additional armament consists of an 7,62-mm machine gun. The AS90 SAU has all-view protection against 7,62-mm armor-piercing bullets; The machine is also equipped with a system for protection against weapons of mass destruction and an automatic fire extinguishing system. Once the enemy’s location is determined, the FST coordinates the guns, mortars, helicopters and jet fighters for striking. AS90 fired at Iraq, while troops deployed in Afghanistan were trained to operate the L118 Light Gun. As expected, the AS90 SAU will remain in service until the 2023 year.

BAE Systems’s M155 777-mm howitzer is considered to be the main strategic system of the future and will soon become a NATO standard in its class. M777 155 mm / 39 caliber has a mass of 4218 kg, rate of fire 5 - 8 shots per minute, quickly deployed in 2 - 3 minutes and can be transported by a medium-sized helicopter.

The Lightweight 155-mm howitzer was developed at the end of the 80-s to meet armament requirements that would have a range like that of the M155 towed howitzer, but would weigh no more than 198 kg. The Marine Corps searched for a lightweight 4000-mm system to replace all existing 155-mm and 105-mm towed artillery systems. BAE Systems' M155A155 lightweight 777-mm howitzer, already in Afghanistan, is a joint program of the Marine Corps and the US Army. As a core element of the American PM-TAS towed artillery program, the M2A777 howitzer replaces the outdated Marine Corps 2-mm M155 cannon. It can fire projectiles without a rocket booster at a range of 198 km, shells with an accelerator at a range of 24 km, and EXCALIBUR projectiles at a distance above 30,5 km. M40 weighs about 777% by weight of a typical 50-mm howitzer. The M155A777 light howitzer is the first artillery system made of titanium and aluminum alloys, it can be delivered by air to remote high-altitude areas that cannot be reached by ground transport, V-2 OSPREY convertible plane, as well as medium and heavy helicopters. To date, deployed over 22 such systems.

Planned improvements to the digital fire control system and the laser ignition system of this howitzer, which is designed to process the Modular Artillery Charge Modular Artillery Charge System (MACS). It is believed that the power supply system of the digital SLA is not capable of providing adequate capabilities during the conduct of Afghan operations. Under the PM-TAS program, the Advanced Power Condition and Control Module, an advanced power condition and control module, is currently being qualified to be installed on all howitzers, and an improved power supply unit will replace the lead-acid batteries.


The system of near air defense Oerlikon SKYSHIELD is designed to protect critical objects


Reactive systems: Russia and not only

The Russian army is upgrading its 300-mm MLRS BM-30 Smerch (designation 9K58 Smerch) by installing new navigation systems and targeting. The system is designed to destroy unarmored and armored targets, artillery and rocket systems; she took part in the hostilities in Chechnya, is in service with the armies of Belarus and Ukraine and was exported to Kuwait, Algeria, Azerbaijan, Peru and the United Arab Emirates.

Improved guidance will allow the Tornado to hit targets at a distance of 200 km. She currently fires an 300-mm 9M55K missile at a range of 20 - 70 km. The 9M55K rocket weighs over 800 kg. Battery MLRS Smerch, as a rule, consists of six launchers and six transport-charging machines (TZM). Intelligent podnaryady have dual-band infrared sensors for targeting in the final part of the trajectory and fragmentation warhead, which is able to penetrate 70-mm armor at an angle 30 ° to the normal.



MLRS BM-30 Smerch


The GLONASS satellite navigation system for the Smerch MLRS will be included in the modernization of the Tornado-S artillery system and will also direct guided missiles at ranges up to 120 km. The Russians also export to Jordan a heavy flamethrower 220 mm TOS-1 Pinocchio. TOS-1 carries 30-kg missiles with thermobaric warheads. The system is mounted on the chassis. tank T-72, but the option for Jordan will be installed on the chassis of the M-60 tank. The Russian army is also upgrading its 16-shell 220-mm MLRS hurricane through the installation of navigation and sighting systems. It was exported to Belarus, Guinea, Moldova, Angola, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan and Ukraine (and it is worth noting to Syria).

MLRS development and conducted in the BRIC countries. In August, 2012 of the year India organized a joint venture with Rosoboronexport for the production of five variants of the RSMO Smerch based on Russian technologies. Smerch-M is the only Indian long-range rocket artillery system. Rosoboronexport supplies Smerch systems to other countries as well, developing their rocket artillery.



Brazilian ASTROS 2020 MLRS


What is available and who buys

In 2011, the Brazilian Ministry of Defense decided to upgrade ASTROS to the configuration of ASTROS 2020 (ASTROS III) as part of a modernization program worth 760 million dollars. It will be financed by 30 ASTROS 2020 systems, which will be able to shoot high-precision AV / MT 300 cruise missiles at a distance of 300 km. The Brazilians are going to oppose their system to the American tactical missile system of the ground forces ATACMS (Army Tactical Missile System), although the ATACMS is firing ballistic and not short-range missiles. ASTROS is also in service with Bahrain, Malaysia, Qatar and Saudi Arabia and will be manufactured in Iraq under a license under the designation SAJIL-60. At the end of 2012, Indonesia ordered 36 launchers from Avibras, which will also supply OMS and other equipment and systems.

Brazilian launcher ASTROS III - characteristics of guided and unguided missiles



The ASTROS III launcher mainly targets the export market. The 8x8 wheeled chassis was selected because of its heavy payload and increased maneuverability, since it will be intended for transportation of five types of unguided rockets of various calibers and two types of guided missiles (see table). The stability of the platform is guaranteed by four hydraulic supports that descend to the ground. This launcher is serviced by a transport-loading vehicle carrying two sets of ammunition for each launcher, and a control vehicle with a fire control system (AV-VCC) that provides battalion level command with fire coordination to three ASTROS batteries.



Lightweight howitzer 155-mm / 39 PEGASUS caliber from ST Kinetics


ST Kinetics offers several systems in this segment. First, it is a lightweight howitzer 155-mm / 39 caliber PEGASUS with the ability to move. It is transported in a C-130 aircraft or a CH-47 helicopter and has a hydraulic (impulse) feed and dispensing system, which reduces the load on the calculation and increases the rate of fire. Secondly, self-propelled howitzer tracked 155-mm / 39 caliber PRIMUS. Advanced automation technology has been introduced into the PRIMUS mobile and lethal howitzer, which allows the minimal calculation of 4 people (including the driver) to effectively manage the system. The calculation can choose the type of ammunition through the OMS, and the ammunition is then loaded with an automatic ammunition processing system. Thirdly, the ST Kinetics 120-mm mortar SRAMS is one of the first mortars, whose recoil forces are less than 30 tons when firing maximum charge, allowing to reach the range 10 km. With a mass of just 1200 kg, it can be installed and fired from a wide variety of light tracked and wheeled vehicles, bringing great fire power to the lower echelons. Fourth, the FH2000 155-mm / 52 caliber howitzer complies with a joint ballistics memorandum that can fire 155-mm projectiles of NATO standard at a distance of up to 40 km. Its loading mechanism allows you to get a shooting rate of up to three shots in 20 seconds.

Aselsan pays special attention to the development of its own weapon systems, among which you can see products for air defense, coastal defense, border security and defense of offshore platforms. The 105-mm light tracked howitzer control system provides computerized planning and execution of firing tasks for a light howitzer. It is designed to increase the mobility of artillery and provide direct fire as well as digital integration into other fire support systems. The system was developed by companies to meet the needs of the Turkish army and is ready to adapt to the requirements of foreign buyers. The Aselsan fire control system (FCS) for towed and self-propelled howitzers combines fire control, communication systems and target designation, which provides rapid deployment, redeployment, high-precision gun guidance and integration into modern artillery operational control systems.


British soldiers from the 3 regiment lead to normal combat with their 155-mm ACS AS90 in Iraq in August 2008



Versatility, mobility, ease of maintenance, the ability to sustain continuous fire and survivability are key features of the Nexter CAESAR (for the standard 155-mm / 52 caliber). The howitzer is fully compatible with NATO’s 39 caliber ammunition and meets operational requirements regardless of the location of the operation, the level of conflict or the nature of the forces involved in it, thanks to its tactical mobility and maneuverability (6x6 truck chassis)


The Roketsan 107-mm MLRS Multi Barrel Rocket Launcher Weapon System is a weapon system that can be used around the clock and in any weather for fire support of combat units. The towed T-107 is an excellent short-range weapon system. It can be transported in its entirety or in a disassembled form, by ground platforms and a helicopter, on board or on a suspension together with its ammunition, or it can be dropped by parachute with ammunition from 48 missiles.


107-mm MLRS Multi Barrel Rocket Launcher Weapon System from the Turkish company Roketsan

The lightweight, towed 105-mm gun was specifically developed by Nexter for quick deployment connections. Priority was given to reliability, ease of operation and weight reduction. In the fighting 105LG1 MkIII has shown its reliability, mobility, maneuverability and firepower. Today, it represents the perfect weapon fire support for troops serving in all weather conditions, including the most difficult terrain. She can fire all NATO standard ammunition, including the G3 OE-LP from Nexter Munitions, over a distance of more than 17 km. TRAJAN is another highly accurate and powerful towed caliber 155-mm / 52 system capable of supporting any motorized rifle or armored unit. It combines the fire power of a CAESAR 155-mm / 52 howitzer and a modern towed gun equipped with an SLA and automated functions, such as firing start / end shooting, guidance, loading. TRAJAN achieves high accuracy due to the initial speed measurement radar, inertial navigation unit and ballistic computer. TRAJAN was designed to achieve high performance in all types of fire operations, for example, it is direct fire support, fire support in the depth of defense, counter battery fire. Its 155-mm / 52 caliber cannon is fully compatible with all 155-mm 39 / 52 NATO-standard ammunition and can fire ERFB (bottom-range projectile) projectiles and intelligent ammunition (BONUS, SPACIDO ...).

Oriental cannons

Among the countries of the former Eastern bloc, only the Russian, Chinese and North Korean industries offer many types of guns.

In Russia, production in the last quarter of a century was limited by two factors; all potential buyers, including the Russian army, had an excessive number of cannons in their arsenals, while new products did not show revolutionary changes and therefore did not greatly add fire power to artillery units.

The heaviest Russian self-propelled gun is the 2X7 Pion 203 mm caliber gun, which has a range of over 44 km and nuclear ammunition in its arsenal. This is the only Soviet gun that does not have a towed version. The second very effective weapon is the 52-mm self-propelled 2C5 Hyacinth unit with a towed version of the 2A36 Hyacinth-B. Both self-propelled guns do not have the protection of the calculation (guns are installed externally) and modern automated guidance system. Consequently, the reaction time and flexibility of their use is below average.

The 152-mm howitzer 2C19 Msta and its towed variant 2A65 Msta-B are the most modern guns in the Russian nomenclature. Self-propelled gun has a semi-automatic loader and automatic target distribution system. However, its range is far behind such Western counterparts, such as, for example, PzH-2000 or FIRTINA / K-9. The further development of 2C19 is the ACS 2C35 Coalition-SV, which has turned into a double-barreled monster. A new gun is installed in an uninhabited tower and three members of the crew are sitting in the hull of a unified chassis of the new generation Armat. The wheel variant of the Coalition is also being considered, where such an autonomous tower will be installed on the 8x8 Kamaz or Typhoon truck chassis.

A light 152-mm howitzer 2A61 Pat-B fills the gap in artillery of the regimental level, while the outdated 122-mm floating howitzer 2-1 is upgraded to the host's 2-34 standard. In this case, a short-range cannon, firing old ammunition, is replaced by an 120-mm howitzer-mortar with a long barrel and a 13 km range. A long-term replacement will be a new automatic cannon with a combat module adapted for the loading capacity of both Russian prospective armored platforms, the crawler Kurganets and the wheeled Boomerang.

The need for light towed guns arose during the Caucasian conflict, then some prototypes were manufactured and tested, but, apparently, no final decision has yet been made. A large number of obsolete, towed howitzer D-30 caliber 122 mm and D-20 caliber 152 mm still remain in service.

The unique coastal defense weapon is the 130-mm Coastal cannon mounted on the heavy MAZ-543M platform. A small number of such installations were deployed by the Black Sea fleet. Another unique type of gun is a howitzer mortar, firing artillery and mortar ammunition. This type includes 120-mm tracked 2C9 Nona, wheeled 2C23 Nona-K and towed 2B16 Nona-B.

Russia still has strong anti-tank artillery with 100-mm smooth-bore guns MT-12, firing conventional shells and more popular guided missiles. The newest version, designated MT-12P, is equipped with a modern radar sight Ruth. The heavier Sprut-B 125-mm gun is still very rare in the troops, while the 2-25 ACS Sprut SD was ordered in very small quantities for the Airborne Forces. It is likely that 2C25 will soon be replaced by one of the members of the Kurgan family, armed with an externally mounted gun.


2C31 Vienna is the next model of a mortar-howitzer 2C9


While China is still pursuing the developed countries, seeking to achieve the capabilities of their weapons systems, new solutions are emerging, but the truth is not clear in what quantities and whether they are made at all.

The largest Chinese implements are X-NUMX-mm ACS W-203 and towed Type-90. The W-90 is a rough copy of the M90A110 cannon, while the Type-3 has a Soviet-style barrel and an American-style breech. Whether they actually entered service and in what quantities is unknown.

The Chinese seem to prefer the 155-mm guns. Two models of ACS, the old PLZ-45 and the new PLZ-05, are in service with only elite units. The latter looks similar to the Russian 2C19, but has a longer barrel and a tower in the rear. The newest gun PLZ-52 is a model of the PLZ-45 with an extended barrel, and, apparently, is focused on export.

China also still "trusts" small-caliber howitzers, where Type-89 (similar to the Soviet 2C1) is probably the most common howitzer in the Chinese army, although recently there are two new models. SH-03 is a different embodiment of the Type-89 with a new turret mounted on a unified armored vehicle (high level of unification with the ZBD-97 infantry fighting vehicle), and PLZ-07 is a member of the amphibious assault vehicles family.

In China, a number of wheeled self-propelled guns also appeared. They basically replicate global trends. SH-1, SH-2 and SH-5 are 155-mm, 122-mm and 105-mm cannons, respectively, mounted on special cross-country vehicles, while others are installed in the towers on 8X8 armored personnel carriers. It is not clear whether only one of these installations has been put into service. Official photos show that at least one 122-mm howitzer on the chassis of a Shanqi SX-2150 6x6 truck was adopted by the Chinese army.

In China, there are no new towed guns, that is, the basis of artillery units are obsolete 152-mm and 122-mm howitzers. More modern 155-mm gun PLL-01 (copy Noricum GC-45), apparently, are quite rare.

China, following the Soviet-Russian way, has developed towed and self-propelled anti-tank artillery. Uniquely Type-89 self-propelled anti-tank gun with 120-mm gun. The lighter options are wheeled anti-tank installations; the newest has a 105-mm gun. Another copy of the Soviet design - 120-mm rifled mortar-howitzer PLL-05 on the armored chassis 6x6.

No one knows, with the exception of the North Korean generals, how many guns can be deployed by Kim Jong-un's army in case of an emergency. A poor and isolated country has developed a number of types of self-propelled units, beating the world record (at least 11 types are exploited!), But their characteristics, reliability and especially the real number remain unknown.

The heaviest are the two versions of the 170-mm gun. The outdated gun is mounted on the turretless tank chassis of the T-54, a newer gun is installed on the specially modified chassis T-54. The lighter options are 152-mm howitzers and cannons, 130-mm cannons, 122-mm howitzers and 100-mm guns. Most of them are installed in open armored compartments (casemates), and only the newest ones in rotating towers. It remains unknown, they are all in mass production or manufactured in small batches. The technical level of these guns is close to the technology of the Second World War, but, nevertheless, small batches were exported to Arab and African countries. The overwhelming majority of North Korean stocks are towed guns, including the outdated Soviet 76-mm ZIS-3 cannons, which are still in service. Perhaps the most advanced tools are the X-NUMX-mm lightweight howitzer D-122, manufactured under license.



120-mm SAU RAK is an approximate analogue of Patria NEMO


In the past, most of the Warsaw Pact countries could produce small-caliber and medium-caliber guns, some even of local development; Soviet licenses were preferable at that time. Currently, Slovakia manufactures DANA / ZUZANA 152-mm and 155-mm wheel howitzers (on the Tatra chassis) and ammunition for them. In 2008, the Polish army ordered an initial batch of eight tracked KRAB 155-mm self-propelled guns on a local development chassis. The gun and the tower are licensed (British AS-90), and the barrel was purchased in France. Another Polish product is the RAK 120-mm mortar; The combat module is mounted on tracked (2C1) or wheeled (ROSOMAK / Patria AMV) chassis.

Also in the "gun business" came a few new players. Cuba is armed with self-propelled guns of its own design based on Soviet base chassis and guns. Two types stand on the modified BMP-1, 100-mm anti-tank gun and 122-mm howitzer. Howiters D-30 and more powerful 130-mm M-46 installed on the tanks T-34. The most heavy and possibly the most modern are 130-mm cannons and 152-mm howitzers on specially made wheeled vehicles. Syria in the past made primitive self-propelled guns (D-30 on T-34), and recently showed a more modern solution - the 130-mm M-46 cannon on the chassis of the Mercedes 8X8 truck. Similar layout is in the prototype of the Sudanese howitzer KHALIFA GHY-02 (D-30 on the chassis of the KamAZ 8x8 truck) and in the self-propelled unit SEMSER developed by Soltam for the Kazakh army.

Materials used:
Military Technology 9 / 2013
http://www.atk.com
http://www.stengg.com
22 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    9 June 2014 08: 07
    Plus for visibility. If infantry is the queen of the battlefield, then artillery is the god of war itself. Taking into account the fact that since ancient times, artillery has played and plays a key role in the conduct of hostilities, its development is expected to continue in any future.
  2. +7
    9 June 2014 09: 17
    There is an acute need for us to instill artillery with guided ammunition. There is a serious lag behind NATO. I saw a story about a missile system created by the Americans to directly support platoons on the battle line. A small container launcher with 15 missiles is placed in the rear, 5-10 kilometers from the front edge. The platoon has a remote control for this unit. At the command of the rocket starts in the direction of this platoon, and its refinement to the target is carried out by a laser target designator at the battlefield. The Americans have calculated that such a launcher is quite enough to solve a platoon of fire missile targets within a single clash.
    1. +3
      9 June 2014 09: 29
      Quote: cobalt
      There is an acute need for us to instill artillery with guided ammunition. There is a serious lag behind NATO. I saw a story about a missile system created by the Americans to directly support platoons on the battle line. A small container launcher with 15 missiles is placed in the rear, 5-10 kilometers from the front edge. The platoon has a remote control for this unit. At the command of the rocket starts in the direction of this platoon, and its refinement to the target is carried out by a laser target designator at the battlefield. The Americans have calculated that such a launcher is quite enough to solve a platoon of fire missile targets within a single clash.

      Yes, there is such a topic, called NLOS-LS ... (The XM501 program for the US Army was canceled in 2011, but the development of the system was continued in the interests of the US Navy)



      And not only Americans produce such a thing, there is also JUMPER (Jumper is autonomous, does not require maintenance personnel and no special launch vehicle. Launch containers with missiles are combined into a block, and are not tied to a specific carrier, they are delivered to their destination by any transport. Jumper consists of several launchers - blocks with missiles that can be placed both on trucks and on the ground, and allows for the precise destruction of targets located at a distance of up to 50 kilometers from closed fire positions.) and weapons too while never enacted.

    2. +1
      28 November 2016 00: 38
      missiles are, of course, cool only expensive and I am surprised that the mattresses went this way, given that they always work either from determining the coordinates of the target and adjusting at the end of the flight of the ammunition, and at the same time they use the usual ammunition of the howitzer or the same KAB.
      Radio-controlled rockets are all fun, but it kills the whole point of using modern reconnaissance reconnaissance means and target designation automation.
      Why am I all this - and it’s all just that when the intelligence worked out well and instantly sent the data for striking, it doesn’t matter whether there are plane racquets or stupid howitzers with MLRS - the main thing is to accurately determine the place and make an adjustment even when the strike itself is possible, or without correction . Just do not forget that modern MLRS systems have correction for zhops shells of howitzers kaba and tp - and all this is inexpensive ammunition.
      And at a distance of the order of 3-5 km, that is, when there is no direct fire contact, it is quite possible to use ATGMs as is done in the same Syria when the calculations of sniper gunners and machine gunners are carried out from afar by mounts - yes it’s not cheap but at such a distance and when there is no possibility precisely determine the coordinates and accurately inflict artillery strike is permissible.
      These systems are essentially the same as those of large sizes and, of course, of a higher price. I don’t see much point in this. If you play pranks on tanks and other moving objects, then Pturov will be enough, and if you play pranks on buildings and warehouses, then damn it art rzzo or Kaby will cope perfectly.
  3. +3
    9 June 2014 09: 48
    "Although rocket artillery cannot match the accuracy and sustained rate of fire of traditional artillery."

    - as much as he can. For example, a Lynx MLRS with an EXTRA missile equipped with a GPS guidance system has better accuracy at longer range. "The missile has a range of over 130 (up to 150) kilometers and is equipped with a 125-kg warhead. ... and the circular probable deviation (CEP) is less than 10 meters." while the barrel brothers KVO have about 30 meters.
    Lynx Reactive Salvo Fire System



    Higher accuracy of barrel artillery means

    no higher ...
    1. fall
      0
      14 June 2014 16: 51
      Whose she is? yours why on kamaz, but not on mans or oshkosh?
      1. 0
        26 September 2023 22: 04
        Quote: beifall
        Whose she is? yours why on kamaz, but not on mans or oshkosh?

        The Lynx MLRS can be installed on any suitable platform at the customer’s request.
      2. 0
        26 September 2023 22: 35
        Quote: beifall
        Whose she is? yours why on kamaz, but not on mans or oshkosh?

        This is for Azerbaijan on Kamaz. In general, the Lynx MLRS can be installed on any suitable platform.

  4. +3
    9 June 2014 09: 59
    I would like an interesting full-review article about aviation, how it works in the complex ... bombers, attack aircraft, fighters, transporters, night hunters, reconnaissance, drones ... without aviation, you won’t be able to fight now ...
  5. +7
    9 June 2014 11: 00
    This M777 is a landing dream. 155 mm howitzers can be thrown under helicopters
    along with the paratroopers. The paratroopers have always suffered without the support of "big
    trunks ".
    1. +2
      9 June 2014 12: 14
      For this, apparently, and made: "M777A2 - field towed howitzer caliber 155 millimeters.
      Manufactured by BAE Systems. Its mass is 4220 kilograms, which allows you to resort to transportation on an external sling of helicopters or convertiplanes.
      The Pentagon ordered 589 howitzers M777A2. In early 2008, BAE Systems received a new order for the supply of an additional batch of 87 units. The howitzer can fire guided projectiles Excalibur, whose range reaches 40 kilometers, and the deviation from the target does not exceed 2 meters.
      It is considered the lightest howitzer of this type. For comparison: the mass of a similar Russian howitzer 2A61 is 4350 kg. This weight is achieved by the wide use of titanium in the construction of the howitzer. "
    2. The comment was deleted.
  6. +1
    9 June 2014 12: 06
    Informative article. Put +
  7. +1
    9 June 2014 18: 51
    Thank you so much for the article.
    I read it with great interest and learned a lot from myself. However, after reading two questions arose, and therefore I am asking knowledgeable members of the forum for help with answers to them.
    First, what is the concept of "light" guns? In caliber reduction? Or the masses? And if the masses, then due to what does this happen?
    Secondly, what should be a modern "combined-arms" gun? What parameters should it have (mass, caliber, how to transport it, etc.)? What kind of shells do she need? Any other bonuses (for example, radar, etc.)?
    Thanks in advance for the answers. I myself am a complete zero in this thread and therefore I will be very grateful for the help.
    PS If you can simpler and with examples)))
  8. +2
    9 June 2014 19: 18
    which allows to reduce losses among civilians

    Well, well ... As if it once cared amers ...
  9. +3
    10 June 2014 00: 51
    Quote: voyaka uh
    This M777 is a landing dream. 155 mm howitzers can be thrown under helicopters
    along with the paratroopers. The paratroopers have always suffered without the support of "big
    trunks ".

    Howitzer artillery as a "long arm" is of course important, but its defensive fire is not enough and it is not omnipotent and is not always available. For a paratrooper, it is not so urgent in battle to hit the enemy at a distance of 17-30 km, be it a 105-mm M119 cannon-howitzer or a 155-mm M777 howitzer, respectively, but from the lack of direct fire support on the battlefield, paratroopers really suffer, for example, without a dowry unit of the mobile, protecting the crew and firing precisely direct fire 125-mm self-propelled gun "Sprut-SD", or the 120-mm universal "Nona-S", or the failed overseas airborne 105-mm M8 AGS system ("faster, easier, stronger" and about them too).
    The M777 is not included in the artillery of the 82nd and 101st airborne divisions, but is in service with the Stryker brigades, light infantry divisions, a separate artillery brigade of the SBR and, of course, the marines. The system, in contrast to the M119 (1,8t.), Is not towed by a light multipurpose vehicle M998 HMMWV, 4x4 (the main vehicle us airborne).
    1. +1
      10 June 2014 10: 23
      The systems you have listed are good, but not airmobile.
      And I did not understand why direct fire? Why let the enemy go
      close, if you can aptly throw it with landmines from 10-15 km
      using the M777?
      For immediate support on the battlefield there are automatic
      grenade launchers, ATGMs. But compared to 155 mm shells - this
      Kids toys.
  10. +2
    10 June 2014 22: 17
    Airborne units (airmobile and airborne) are far from self-sufficient in terms of firepower and autonomy, i.e. they are very dependent on the supply of MTO means and ammunition (I recall that in the US Air Force there are no 155 mm howitzers, there are 105 mm howitzers, I have already talked about vehicles).
    Speaking of landing, you mean the Marine Corps, then the former 155 mm M198 howitzer was also airborne by CH-53 D / E helicopters.
    Quote: voyaka uh
    The systems you have listed are good, but not airmobile.

    Maybe that's why airborne (infantry) formations are widely used precisely in conjunction with armored / armored cavalry units and formations, complementing each other - when it comes to combating partisan formations.
    They forgot about the "Nona-S" (8t), although they are all "airmobile" if we talk about the heavy Russian transport aircraft Mi-26. I will mention CH-53E, in the Marine Corps it is intended, among other things, for the transfer of armored vehicles of the LAV-25, 8x8 (14,5t) family on two external hooks (there was an LAV version with a 90-mm Kokkeril cannon, but the Marine Corps did not have an extra caliber needed, because there is MBT M1A1)
  11. +1
    10 June 2014 22: 20
    Quote: voyaka uh
    And I did not understand why direct fire? Why let the enemy go
    close...

    Close!? Direct aim does not mean within sight with the naked eye, and therefore in the line of sight, i.e. It means visibility at a considerable distance (up to 4-5 km), too, using optical and optoelectronic devices (sights).
    A well-organized adversary can inflict serious losses on you (you don’t have armored vehicles! - you forgot?) At a considerable distance from the fortified firing positions of the lower floors and basements and temporary firing points of the upper floors of multi-storey buildings, while these buildings can be arrays of buildings (quarters), those. in essence, they will be a layered defense, such a terrain can have a rather complicated terrain for effective fire impact, both with mortars (along a mounted trajectory) and howitzers (along a laid trajectory). At the same time, the existing portable weapons may have insufficient effective firing range (disposable RPGs), or insufficient power (light ATGMs, RPGs, AGSs) in comparison with assault guns. Even worse, if the enemy has at least a platoon of tanks, and you have no MBT.
    All over the world, MBT are used as mobile assault guns to maintain a database in urban conditions, but in our case, we can talk about air transportable (landing) systems. By the way, for the striker brigades it became quite obvious that 155-mm towed howitzers М777 (М198 - earlier), self-propelled 152-mm ATGM TOW-2 (M1134) and 120-mm self-propelled mortars (M1129), even despite the shortcomings of the M1128 MGS with a 105mm cannon cannot replace it.
    Quote: voyaka uh
    For immediate support on the battlefield there are automatic
    grenade launchers, ATGMs. But compared to 155 mm shells - this
    Kids toys.

    Since everything is so wonderful, maybe then it is worth reorganizing, or rather, abolishing the ground forces before the structure of the times of the First World War? when the main types of troops were infantry (but with modern portable weapons) and artillery (in this case, a towed barrel), we omit the cavalry and engineering units. And, let's forget about armored vehicles and artillery systems based on it, as unnecessary systems for suppressing the enemy, "if you can accurately throw it with land mines from 10-15 km using the M777"
    1. +1
      11 June 2014 13: 28
      There is a principle: with what greater distance did you start
      hit the enemy the better.
      The structure of battalions and brigades is constantly changing from
      change of arms. Light howitzer M777 has passed
      as if from its aero-mobility from the "front" artillery
      in the field. The most modern in the world is built, in my opinion,
      US Marine Corps: with attack aircraft,
      helicopters, tanks, artillery in their submission.
      And the marines immediately grabbed light howitzers.
      Everything is self-propelled at the IDF, but structurally it’s conservative,
      in particular, heavy self-propelled howitzers do not have time for
      advancing troops and troops are left without art.
      Great reforms have begun in this regard.
  12. +3
    12 June 2014 20: 01
    Quote: voyaka uh
    There is a principle: with what greater distance did you start
    hit the enemy the better.

    - These are obvious and elementary things! But do you seriously expect to shield your infantry from direct clashes? Then for the infantry brigade (18 howitzers for 3 infantry battalion), which took up defense at a width of up to 20 km, + direction along the flanks, take care of timely round-the-clock (the enemy can advance even at night) reconnaissance of targets at a sufficient distance (range) from the front edges, i.e. about SUFFICIENT number of spotter and reconnaissance UAVs, because the enemy will use MANPADS, we will not forget about flying weather (lack of low cloudiness, for example). If you plan to use ground-based radars (moving targets), then keep in mind that the effectiveness of, for example, short-range AN / PPS-15A (3km) and short-range AN / PPS-5B (10km) in the US Army is limited by conditions and terrain terrain. The advancing enemy can move on MBT and BMP / BTR at speeds of up to 50 km / h over rough terrain and deployed along the front battle formation, not in marching columns. Do not forget about the artillery of the enemy (self-propelled howitzers, for example, capable of quickly changing position) and its counter-battery measures (artillery radars). Well, the railway echelon of artillery ammunition must be taken care of at the same time, otherwise the ammunition tends to run out quickly, given the expense of correction errors and sighting volleys.
    The paratroopers have always suffered without the support of "big
    trunks ".
    - indisputably, but if in relation to the paratroopers and foot soldiers directly in contact, in contact with the enemy, then we are talking about trunks that allow you to crush, destroy the enemy, i.e. about mobile tank and assault guns MBT (ideally) and light armored vehicles (at least), respectively. I remind you that with intensive databases, artillery resources may not always be enough (an artillery battery of 6 howitzers per 600-800 man infantry battalion) for operational support at the request of all units, companies and platoons, including reconnaissance.
  13. +1
    13 June 2014 00: 35
    Quote: voyaka uh
    This M777 is a landing dream.

    To paraphrase: "an assault gun is a landing party's dream" is closer to an assault force, because it acts jointly and simultaneously with an assault force. And the air and artillery support is from a different opera, because at certain moments of the battle the same can be said about 120-mm mortars, 152/155-mm howitzers, fire support helicopters, attack aircraft and strike fighters, which are united by the fact that they work from where something from the rear area, on call, or on request. Such is the philosophy.
    1. +2
      13 June 2014 02: 40
      Mortars, assault guns - all this is wonderful and useful.
      Drop everything that cannot be thrown with landing helicopters ...
      What will be left? Little.
      You, it seems to me, cannot possibly realize that a new one has appeared
      type of artillery: heavy airmobile. She was not there before.
      This is a fundamental qualitative leap. Two helicopters and one
      152 guns make up a combat unit. One helicopter takes
      gun and people, the second shells. In the deep rear you can
      start accurate shelling of the enemy from 20 km and have time to wash off
      before the troops come to you. Need not
      self-propelled, she does not have to go anywhere. The gun picks up a helicopter.
  14. +2
    13 June 2014 14: 35
    Quote: voyaka uh
    Mortars, assault guns - all this is wonderful and useful.
    Drop everything that cannot be thrown with landing helicopters ...
    What will be left? Little.

    In light infantry divisions, 120-mm mortars (4 per bat-on) are thrown together with the HMMWV transport vehicle and a two-axle trailer with a UH-60 Black Hawk helicopter
    Quote: voyaka uh
    You, it seems to me, cannot possibly realize that a new one has appeared
    type of artillery: heavy airmobile.

    - Rich fantasy! "heavy airmobile" - invented by themselves, or what scribe prompted the invention?
    Yes where? where did she come from? In the marines, for fast landing on the coast, combined landing by sea and by air is used, self-propelled howitzers are delivered by assault boats, and towed by transport and assault helicopters, which later come with full-time 5-ton 6x6 trucks, on this actually all MP airborne artillery operations can and end, then helicopters and boats are engaged in the supply of deployed troops.
    Typically, an assault echelon simultaneously drops two MP infantry companies deep into the coast and from two companies to two battalions on amphibious armored personnel carriers (depending on whether an expeditionary battalion or brigade landed), then with subsequent echelons are delivered including towed howitzers.
    The M777 ground forces are armed with the 18th airborne assault corps of the RBF (including the Special Corps of the PA Corps), but they are not armed with the air assault (airmobile) and airborne divisions (there are 105 mm M119), the former before that, the 155-mm M198 (7,2t.) could also be thrown by the CH-47D / E Chinook (in the MP CH-53D / E), but not Black Hawk (only M119) - nothing has changed in the concept of use and tactics. The howitzer was developed from the end of the 80s, it was planned to weigh from 3,4 tons. up to 3,6t., i.e. under UH-60. Well, the euphoria has passed - has it come to awareness?
    Quote: voyaka uh
    In the deep rear you can
    start accurate shelling of the enemy from 20 km and have time to wash off
    before the troops come to you. Need not
    self-propelled, she does not have to go anywhere. The gun picks up a helicopter.

    Enough to invent! - transport vehicles must be delivered by subsequent waves (echelons) of helicopters. The advantage of self-propelled howitzers is that they are able to quickly change position in order to avoid being hit by a retaliatory volley of the enemy. What do you want to "get away" from? - unclear! An evacuation helicopter will not save you from battery fire, even if it is on duty in the vicinity of a deployed howitzer. There is no need to come up with new stupid artillery tactics, harassing and distracting actions are imposed on airmobile troops, but they are performed by helicopter and infantry units and portable weapons (81-mm mortars, ATGMs).
    M119:


    PS: The dreams of US paratroopers were gone with the M8, and even more so nothing new in the air mobility of troops, but they are good!
  15. +3
    13 June 2014 22: 18
    It’s not me who invents the new tactics, but the US Army. They had a wonderful practice with the M777 in Afghanistan.
    I only envy her, because in the arsenal of my country - Israel - there is no such technology that
    limits the possibilities of landing operations.
    Landing howitzers from a helicopter in those places where there are enemy batteries is, of course, stupid.
    For this, there is intelligence that identifies a dangerous place or not.
    You described traditional tactics in detail. I do not argue that they are relevant today.
    But one must not be afraid to look at the new.
  16. +2
    14 June 2014 00: 52
    If tactics are put into practice, this does not mean that they are new.
    In AOI, everything is optimized for the country. Self-propelled artillery, with its saturation and competent dispersal of artillery units together with armored vehicles throughout the country, is the best option for the Israeli army, airmobile transfers (motor vehicles would be difficult) would be required if only for rifle (infantry) units (IMHO).

    M777 is good, but also expensive due to the materials used. The usual renewal of the fleet of towed howitzers with the replacement of the M198 that performed the same tasks and delight in this regard: "This is a fundamental qualitative leap" - I do not understand this. I could understand, for example, if, with a decrease in the weight of the system, the firing range increased, i.e. a barrel with a length of 39 calibers would be replaced by 52 kb. (the new standard) used in 155 mm self-propelled systems.
    There are enough inventions in the US Army to please the military-industrial complex, at least take MRAP class armored personnel carriers with which the army and marines were oversaturated, with all kinds of models and without a hint of selectivity, so much so that from 50% to 60% of the fleet of these vehicles was unclaimed and unnecessary and most importantly, they did not justify themselves as regular combat vehicles of increased survivability. Their low passability (any blockage on the road makes them immobilized, which is detrimental in the conditions of the city), in addition to cumbersomeness and excessive dimensions, they make them very vulnerable on the contrary. But the fashion for them managed to infect the minds in many countries.
  17. +2
    14 June 2014 12: 31
    Self-propelled artillery performed well with us before
    had to go deep into mountain Lebanon. Then she (and no less useful
    120 mm mortars) were lagging behind, and only infantry were advancing
    on TBTR and Merkava. No artillery support. Then they started talking
    that if it were possible to transfer guns to heights (cleared by paratroopers
    before this) in the deep rear, it would be possible to maintain the landing and
    advancing tank units from the depths of the enemy's rear, and not "through
    heads "- traditionally. And the Americans have already done this in mountainous Afghanistan with a grandiose
    success!
    Have you noticed that I do not refute your posts, but only supplement them?

    As for the US Army, it experiments a lot with tactics and weapons,
    and it is right. Many ideas fail when faced with a battle
    reality, but something turns out and is widely implemented.
    I don’t know how big MRAPs are, but replacing the Humvee with semi-jeeps with a decent mine
    I like the defense, because I managed to patrol a bit on the Humvee and, I remember,
    prayed that they would not cheek on a mine.
  18. fall
    0
    14 June 2014 16: 52
    M 777 BAE System is a masterpiece, either 4 or 5 cartoons worth it, it’s good that you have sniffed with the BAE System!
  19. +1
    14 June 2014 19: 48
    You also have 160 mm mortars (Soltam M66)
    Quote: voyaka uh
    Have you noticed that I do not refute your posts, but only supplement them?

    - Not too much! the impression that you have "light like a wedge converged" on the M777 and that its support is sufficient, the infantry, in addition to their weapons, will get out with it. And what about the American experience of forward support bases in Afghanistan (similar to the Vietnam War), scattered across the country, between which helicopters usually drag howitzers?
    In the USA, the MRAP program started in 2007, by which time armored cars (not armored personnel carriers) with an emphasis on mine protection, with a V-shaped bottom, for example: Dingo-2, Germany, had already been created and produced. VLRB, France; Iveco LMV, Italy.