Military Review

Rendezvous on the net

42
Good afternoon, dear colleagues and especially like-minded people. As we see, the most lively interest and participation is caused by events in Ukraine, and very many events occurring in the world are tied precisely to the vicissitudes that occur there. Therefore, the word “Rendezvous” I used here in the meaning of the interaction in parallel with the processes taking place (see “Vic”).


FACTS - A STRONGTHING THING. A few days ago, an article “Secrets and secrets of the propaganda machine of Vladimir Putin". Quite an emotional article, distributing flops to the right and left and urging the reader to make sure that Russia is absolutely doing nothing in Ukraine. I liked the article with the syllable and intensity of emotions with which it is filled, but after reading it does not leave astonishment and the question arises: “And what did the author want to say in the end?” Who is the correct one - “white” or “red”? Or to convince that Putin is “not in the works” at all, that he has merged the nenk, long-suffering and lost in his desires, or that he is not capable of anything at all?

It seems that the author tried to convey to us the only true HIS idea: “Everything is around in guan, and he is alone in a dress coat and is not understood. It's a shame, you know.

But, if you say that everything is fools around, then offer a wise recipe-panacea, and you will be happy. Emotions are good and there will be a splash of them too, there will be less gray hair on the head. But if we look at the facts and try to find a “trace” of Russian participation in the events in Ukraine?

On the Internet resource “Sputnik-Pogrom”, from where the repost of the mentioned article occurred, there is an article “Akhmetov will come, bring order! (not really)". So, there are some materials that shed light on the mysterious attempt on Bolotov (even the hypothesis was advanced that this attempt was organized by Akhmetov and was made by the hands of his bandits) and why this attempt was unsuccessful. Without retelling everything, I will give only a few lines from that “interview”:

“LR, I report.
They were shooting around noon, two hours before the meeting with Pushilin. Valera is slightly injured. It could have been worse, but the ambush did not think that Valera was better guarded than Yanukovych, and the lads ran into them. Now Valera is completely safe, the air has been delivered to (shaded), the doctors say that they will quickly come back and return.
Officially, nothing is reported, but I can report that one dead came to life for a while, sang a song and died again. At the most general level, the song that the order came from Petit's headquarters, the specialists worked, they thought that they were going to run into Lugansk mouflons, and they themselves came across who you knew.
The million dollar question is: who exactly did the killers run into, who thought that there was still no 98 around and more terrible than the “Lux” grouping? And even more interesting question: what do the killer survivors feel after this small but significant incident? Are any of them willing to repeat the experience?
While Ukrainian analysts are thinking about the answer, and the terrible gangsters of Akhmetov write applications for dismissal with the wording “Go and fight with the army special forces”, we allow ourselves to summarize briefly ... ”

Colleagues, did you have some guesswork? Do you think it is possible to call an “army special forces” any structure other than the army special forces itself? And do you think that Bolotov is carefully guarded by the Ukrainian army special forces?

Another material. We all know who Igor Strelkov is (Girkin, Shooter). Here are some excerpts from his biography. Especially I take those who shed some light on his "affiliation".

But little is known about Strelkov, although some detailed publications about him continue to appear. For example, an article by the famous Moscow journalist Oleg Kashin on "Elephant". According to this, Girkin and Boroday began to cooperate in the Crimea at the end of February. Moreover, the whole Crimean project in general was a kind of "private-state" partnership between the Kremlin and the famous Orthodox oligarch Malofeev (Marshal Capital). Boroday collaborated with him.

It was the latter who “led” Prime Minister Crimea Aksyonov to the referendum and, in general, supervised him. Shooters at that time was also on the peninsula and engaged in local self-defense. After success in the Crimea, the same group took up the Donbas. True, according to Kashin, there she acts at her own risk without any real help from the Kremlin. And, they say, the position of this group is so awful that the Shooter even wrote down a special appeal to the residents of Donbass, where he shamed them that they were reluctant to sign up for self-defense units.

At the same time, according to the "Reporter", everything is not so simple. Indeed, both Malofeyev, and Borodai, and Strelkov act with a large degree of independence. At the same time, according to some data, Aksenov coordinates their activities (as well as work throughout the Southeast). And all this is strictly supervised by the Kremlin, where all major decisions are made. But, what is really true, in the case of Donbas, Russia does not want to shine much of its activity. Therefore, there are publications that show that “we have nothing to do with it” (and Strelkov’s appeal may have the same task).


In fact, the tactics of Moscow, as far as can be judged, is to provide unofficial support to the protesters in the Donbas (weapons and volunteers) so that they could take control of the entire region, and then spread the protest to the rest of the Southeast, and then, possibly, go to Kiev. At the same time, there is a hard casting among local leaders - who will show himself best. So in the near future, many of them can be replaced ...

Well, and so on. Interested and doubtful, I offer a summary line from this article: “The SBU says that he is a colonel of the GRU of the Russian Defense Ministry, however, according to our data, as reported above, he had nothing to do with the GRU, but worked in the FSB,” and also recall the saying “There are no former special agents” and a reference where you can fully satisfy your interest regarding Girkin (Arrow): http://novorus.info/news/interesno/16484-kto-ty-strelok.html.

SUMMARY, dear colleagues: emotions are beautiful, but it is desirable to support them with facts. We read, compare, analyze, draw a conclusion.

SHOWING HYDRA DEZA. And one more aspect I would like to touch on, guys and girls, is the processing of the mind in the conditions of the infovey. Of course, everyone has the right to choose the side of the confrontation - either jumping and demanding lard to the Heroes, or becoming one of the supporters of the great Russia. Depending on this, you give preference to one or another source, not forgetting to look into less preferred ones - you need to know the enemy by sight.

The enemy becomes more sophisticated, playing subtly, uncompromising and angry (something Garry Kasparov came to mind ...). And therefore, often articles that seem to be placed in pro-Russian sources slowly introduce completely anti-Russian ideas and thoughts into our consciousness.

The article “Fashization of Ukraine and the separation of Novorossia with the Crimea” caught my eye. Good article, competent and, it would seem, completely pro-Russian. But - this aspect is alarming: The article considers two options for the separation of Ukraine - one catastrophic (this is when Russia washes its hands, and the West is scooping up everything that it wishes, and Russia looks after Ukraine leaving for the EU with sadness and sadness), other (attention):

- “Acceptable option.
Ukrainian New Russia with an autonomous Crimea and Western Ukraine (Little Russia, Galicia) - this option of dividing Ukraine can be considered satisfactory. At least, it excludes the formation of fragments in the form of Donbass and Crimea - a tragic variant. Obviously, only a large republic, including the regions of Ukrainian New Russia and an autonomous Crimea, only such a large, unified state, with equal rights for Ukrainians and Russians, will be able to protect the residents of the south-east of present-day Ukraine and prevent a bloody fire on the borders of Russia.
And here, it’s important historical the idea of ​​Ukrainian New Russia, so that an amorphous-geographical neoplasm like Transnistria does not arise. We need the Republic of Ukraine Novorossiya, rooted in historical roots during the time of Catherine the Great.
Ukraine is Russia's southern front in its struggle with the world capitalist system for its existence. Here the Kremlin needs a new Zhukov, and we have Zurabov. ”

Surprising position of the author. And outraged! As if the Crimeans were undecided for themselves - with whom they should be and, as if, there were not those tears of joy and words: “We returned home!” In my opinion, it is even hypothetically impossible to consider options with the inclusion of Crimea in any other country , as soon as Russia, and not some kind of “big republic, including Novorossia and the autonomous Crimea”. So you think - whether the author of the article mentioned is an intelligent and hidden nationalist who has a sight to some kind of "nezalezhno" from Russia, the future and who wants to return the Crimea to the bosom of the Great Ukraine, or something "does not catch up with." In what such theories degenerate, we are lucky to see by the results of the rule the descendants of the "great ukrov" for two decades.

I will not load your attention further, dear colleagues, I will be bold. In the coming days, I plan to publish a publication with the tentative title “Attention, ideological helminthiasis!” And I hope that the editors will not conceal it, as happened with the article “This is LJ - for good reason!”, Sent by 4 in May.

Sincerely - Esaul
42 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Russian jacket
    Russian jacket 26 May 2014 08: 24
    +30
    Support and help with money and weapons, as well as politically - this is at the moment the most correct strategy in the South-East of Ukraine .... hi
    1. MOISEY
      MOISEY 26 May 2014 08: 42
      +13
      And humanitarian aid will also not be out of place. In the LPR and DPR, a humanitarian catastrophe will soon be at such a pace, we must help as much as possible.
      1. I do not care
        I do not care 26 May 2014 08: 51
        +9
        Quote: MOISEY
        how can we help.

        guess at once who is fighting in Slavyansk together with Strelkov ..
        1. I do not care
          I do not care 26 May 2014 08: 56
          +2
          Vostok battalion in Donetsk
          1. JoylyRoger
            JoylyRoger 26 May 2014 09: 21
            +3
            yes, the Vostok battalion, only the Chechen battalion seems to have been disbanded, and the DPR desperately emphasize that it has nothing to do with the Chechen Vostok battalion.
            But if so, in any case, God forbid!
        2. Alex_Popovson
          Alex_Popovson 26 May 2014 09: 09
          0
          What peppy nokhchi, there are Ms., fellow bro.
        3. Hleb
          Hleb 26 May 2014 09: 41
          0
          I can’t guess, so who?
        4. deputy ___ watered
          deputy ___ watered 26 May 2014 13: 32
          -1
          This photo is over 5 years old, some of these servicemen are not alive!
          1. Alex_Popovson
            Alex_Popovson 26 May 2014 14: 38
            0
            Prove the converse
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. matross
            matross 26 May 2014 17: 26
            +1
            Quote: deputy ___ watered
            This photo is over 5 years old

            I don’t know for this photo, all the more unclickable. But if there were a significant number of fighting Nokhchi and their ilk in the southeast, all the more so detachments of them, all the enemy news agencies, PACE, OSCE, Psaka from the State Department, the League of Zoophiles' Defense and other bastards would have already shouted about it ...
    2. Max_Bauder
      Max_Bauder 26 May 2014 08: 56
      +6
      the author is right - there may be more mishandled Cossacks. I remember the Soviet poster: the chatterbox is a godsend for the spy.
      1. ispaniard
        ispaniard 26 May 2014 09: 01
        +11

        Battalion "Vostok" Soldiers-internationalists on the path of fascism. Glory to you guys!
      2. The comment was deleted.
    3. mamont5
      mamont5 26 May 2014 09: 38
      +2
      Quote: Russian quilted jacket
      Support and help with money and weapons, as well as politically - this is at the moment the most correct strategy in the South-East of Ukraine .... hi


      Yes /, the best and only possible.
    4. rkkasa xnumx
      rkkasa xnumx 26 May 2014 12: 40
      -1
      Quote: Russian quilted jacket
      Support and assistance with money and weapons, as well as politically


      If Igor Strelkov-Strelok-Girkin is the same person, then it is unlikely. Here is what he wrote 2 years ago:

      In connection with the indicated interests of the West, the speeches against Putin will not stop. They will continue to increase. Does this mean that we need to support Putin? Of course not! Rather, it could be supported - with a cardinal change of course, the rejection of a comprador and completely stealing environment ...

      Totally here: vikmarkovci.7bb.ru/viewtopic.php?id=991#p17298

      Or they will try to replace Strelkov with someone else, more loyal to the Kremlin.
      It is possible that Vostok battalion in Donetsk, the first step towards this. Again Babai, most likely there was some kind of infa:

      I was asked if Chechens are needed here. I say: no, the Chechens are not needed here, since we, the Orthodox people, will deal with our Orthodox people. Nobody owes us ...

      - That is, you, as Orthodox, would not want Muslims to fight on your side?

      - Нет.


      All the same, V.I. Lenin was right when he said:

      People have always been and always will be stupid victims of fraud and self-deception in politics, until they learn to seek the interests of particular classes for any moral, religious, political, social phrases, statements, promises.
    5. Cherdak
      Cherdak 26 May 2014 20: 51
      +1
      Quote: 1
      emotions are beautiful, but it is desirable to support them with facts

      Yesaul, but where are the facts?
      Quote: 2
      Is there any structure other than army special forces that can be called “army special forces”?

      Deep thought, IQ rolls over
      Quote: 3
      “They say in the SBU that he is a colonel of the GRU of the Russian Ministry of Defense, however, according to our information, as reported above, he had nothing to do with the GRU, but worked for the FSB”

      It is not a fact, it is fact winked
      Quote: 4
      The position of the author is surprising. And outraged!

      Not in the eyebrow, but right in the milk.
    6. Sterlya
      Sterlya 27 May 2014 00: 21
      0
      Something muddied, muddied. Personally, I’m not like Crimea anymore. And Donetsk and Lugansk already definitely do not represent any Ukraine as a part. As an independent state I can still, not part of Russia. The rest of the Russian-speaking Ukraine is still in the fog, but I think that they will be brought to the department of non-politics in Kiev
    7. VNP1958PVN
      VNP1958PVN 27 May 2014 03: 28
      0
      But it’s not worth it to “be ashamed” in this matter. On the amerskoy side, no one is ashamed of anything!
  2. saag
    saag 26 May 2014 08: 29
    +6
    I wonder why the slogan "All power is for the working people" was not voiced in such a region as the current Novorossia, because they oppose the power of the oligarchy, as it is strange, in this case it turns out just replacing one with another
    1. dmitriygorshkov
      dmitriygorshkov 26 May 2014 09: 26
      +3
      Quote: saag
      "All power - to the working people", because then they oppose the power of the oligarchy, as it is strange, in this case it turns out just replacing one with another

      Do not you think that you have put everything together? In New Russia there is not a revolution, and not a change in the state formation!
      We are talking about the separation from the state of the antagonist-Ukrainina! No more, no less! No need to ascribe non-existent shifts to replace the system!
      New Russia now needs to disperse as fast as possible and as bloodless as possible from the territory rolling from the hills to the railway station! And what system they choose for themselves will be decided later. This is now not primary!
      1. saag
        saag 26 May 2014 11: 16
        0
        no, the formation of a new state formation does not seem to be in New Russia, so everything is in order
  3. VADEL
    VADEL 26 May 2014 08: 32
    +10
    I would like to see how Putin shows Obama the "Znarok gesture" and helps the South-East.
    1. Apollo
      Apollo 26 May 2014 08: 40
      +1
      good morning everybody hi

      quote-................................. and I hope that the editors won't poher her, as it happened with the article “This is a good luck!” sent by 4 on May. end of quote


      for this one expression - negative
      smacks of pressure on the administration and blackmail.
  4. surovts.valery
    surovts.valery 26 May 2014 09: 02
    +4
    Who is correct, “white” or “red”?

    A week before the referendum in Crimea, there was an article in the "MK" with forecasts of some well-known political scientists and politicians (I will not mention them). They answered two questions: 1. What will be the results of the referendum? 2. What is the future of Crimea? Apart from the Communist MP, no one has definitely answered. It seems that they were just trying to evade the answer, fearing to spoil their image in case of a wrong forecast. But even then, any grandmother on the bench at the entrance had a clear answer to at least the first question. I certainly understand that making predictions is a thankless task. But there should be a position.
  5. ia-ai00
    ia-ai00 26 May 2014 09: 03
    +8
    The position of the author is surprising. And outraged! It was as if the Crimeans had not decided for themselves who they should be with, and as if there weren’t those tears of joy and the words: “We returned home!”

    I totally agree! Throughout the territory of Crimea, people literally WERE JOINED BY JOY that THEY AND RUSSIA ARE ONE COUNTRY! "Force" so many people rejoice ...
    Those who DO NOT SEE THIS, the hidden or open ENEMY of Russia, are Russian.
  6. Consul-t
    Consul-t 26 May 2014 09: 03
    +2
    Oh, how difficult it is at the Yeperny Theater.
    Everyone wants to sing the main part, and even in the orchestra the main violin and drums quarrel ...
  7. cerbuk6155
    cerbuk6155 26 May 2014 09: 11
    +4
    NEWS RUSSIA should begin to provide military-economic assistance. soldier
    1. kombat58
      kombat58 26 May 2014 09: 15
      +6
      Already! But it’s not necessary to state this at a UN meeting
  8. papont64
    papont64 26 May 2014 09: 19
    +1
    The Republic of Novorossia needs real help with weapons, money and volunteers, and no Kiev is afraid of them.
  9. blackberry
    blackberry 26 May 2014 09: 23
    +8
    Given the urgency of the question, the author should have arranged the read / mentioned articles in chronological order, perhaps then the questions themselves would have had fewer questions, and the readers would not have fooled their heads. I remember very well that I read an article about Novorossia and the autonomous Crimea before the Crimean referendum. I couldn't remember the source, but it was some kind of Russian aggregator. I decided to check with Google. It turned out that the earliest publication of this article "Fascization of Ukraine and the secession of Novorossiya from Crimea?"took place February 24, 2014, on the Ukrainian resource and here is a direct link http://vybor.ua/article/sistemnye_problemy_gosudarstvennosti/fashizaciya-ukrainy

    -i-otdelenie-ukrainskoy-novorossii-s-krymom.html. How else, besides being autonomous, could the author of the article call the territory of Crimea on a Ukrainian site in February 2014 ?! And the author formulated it as a question.

    I’m ashamed, my friend.
    .
    1. esaul
      26 May 2014 10: 49
      +1
      еchewing gum
      I greet you. hi

      "Given the urgency of the issue, the author should have arranged the read / referenced articles in chronological order,"

      Why on earth, madam? request It would be events of the same series and united by one thought - I probably would have done so yes But, when two facts testify to NOT the reasons for the successful progress of RUSSIA (I emphasize) in Ukrainian affairs - this is one thing, and when it is said that what is hidden behind the externally pro-Russian texts is another. And yet - each has its own sources. My source, in the title of the article cited, did not have a question mark.
      So I have nothing to be ashamed of. hi
      1. blackberry
        blackberry 26 May 2014 11: 01
        +3
        Quote: esaul
        еchewing gum
        I greet you. hi

        "Given the urgency of the issue, the author should have arranged the read / referenced articles in chronological order,"

        Why on earth, madam? request It would be events of the same series and united by one thought - I probably would have done so yes But, when two facts testify to NOT the reasons for the successful progress of RUSSIA (I emphasize) in Ukrainian affairs - this is one thing, and when it is said that what is hidden behind the externally pro-Russian texts is another. And yet - each has its own sources. My source, in the title of the article cited, did not have a question mark.
        So I have nothing to be ashamed of. hi

        You dealt with the topic, but did not double-check the sources. Shitty analyst. Justify yourself with someone else's copy-paste - well, once again a worthless analyst. You have combined the events in one article, and - "they would have been united by one thought." You're still an analyst.
        1. esaul
          26 May 2014 11: 18
          -5
          What evil is that? belay And in appearance - a fairy ... crying
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. dmb
          dmb 26 May 2014 11: 32
          0
          Ma'am, who are you going to shame? This is only possible if a person knows this feeling. More than once reading the author. long ago came to the conclusion that he did not burden himself with such trifles. Relatively recently, he regularly praised the unearthly wisdom of a certain Serdyukov (while discovering the phenomenal ignorance of the geography and literature of his native country.) When this Serdyukov was touched, he praised the unearthly wisdom of the guarantor who turned him on. I agree with you that the next set of phrases is not an analyst, but an elementary praise of the wisdom of the Guarantor.
          1. esaul
            26 May 2014 11: 44
            +1
            Quote: dmb
            More recently, he regularly praised the unearthly wisdom of a certain Serdyukov

            It would not hurt to provide evidence to confirm. I did not allow myself to express myself in the spirit - "On the count!" in relation to Serdyukov. As for Putin's "unearthly wisdom", I still have no doubts in his outstanding abilities as a head of state. To your displeasure, you will see my positive assessments of his activities more than once. And on occasion - to shame me, here it would not hurt you to remember that the loudest shouts "Thief!" - the thief himself. hi
            1. dmb
              dmb 26 May 2014 20: 36
              +1
              Honorable Esaul, I dare not interfere with this. In my opinion, an unseemly thing. I reserve the right to give him a proper assessment. By the way, would you mind posting on the forum your personal appeal to me without any notes. However, I give this opportunity to you myself, including the publication of my answer. This, I believe, will largely allow us to judge our debate on issues of decency.
          2. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  10. mamont5
    mamont5 26 May 2014 09: 39
    +1
    Quote: MOISEY
    And humanitarian aid will also not be out of place.

    Quote: mamont5
    Quote: Russian quilted jacket
    Support and help with money and weapons, as well as politically - this is at the moment the most correct strategy in the South-East of Ukraine .... hi


    Yes /, the best and only possible.
  11. Grbear
    Grbear 26 May 2014 09: 49
    +5
    Isn't it time for our "nadolniks", with their instructions on what Russia should do, to go to war on the information front. Or are there not enough arguments?
    Now about the article.
    I have put together two articles - this one and "The Ghost of the Lieutenant: Our Name is Strelkov". In one, Strelkov - the FSB, in the other - a Russian officer, and as a result - new type of representative of the head of state (at any level). The type of person who relies on Russian principles and traditions, distanced from venality and selfish interests. Maybe this is the beginning of a revival ?! Then you have to wait for the activation of Chubaisin and other librania in our house. And this is not the problem of another country, albeit close. This is a war in our home. Are we ready for her? That is the question.
    1. esaul
      26 May 2014 11: 08
      +4
      Quote: GrBear
      Maybe this is the beginning of a revival ?!

      Mikhail Yurievich, I welcome you hi In my opinion, the revival began with the squeezing of American offices that organized the robbery of Russia according to the law on a separate product, put Khodorkovsky and the exodus from Russia of the Berezovsky Gusinsky and other dignitaries. drinks
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. zzz
      zzz 26 May 2014 11: 34
      +3
      Quote: GrBear
      Maybe this is the beginning of a revival ?! Then you have to wait for the activation of Chubaisin and other librania in our house. And this is not the problem of another country, albeit close. This is a war in our home.


      It seems that it has already begun, has long been absent, not quite in the subject, but the contradictions of Glazyev and Chubais have already begun.
  12. Standard Oil
    Standard Oil 26 May 2014 10: 20
    +3
    Nothing in itself certainly happens, that Russia supports the South-East is understandable. This is understandable, if you look at the behavior of Ukrainian punishers, curl, curl around but do not dare to take serious actions, bite, run away, it means something of a junta he knows that for crossing a certain line, reckoning will immediately follow and no NATO will save.
  13. Sanglier
    Sanglier 26 May 2014 10: 40
    +1
    The main thing is to open and keep the border with Russia open from the Donbass side. With ours it is impossible because of understandable attempts to penetrate "pravosekov". And then ... Who is there going to Donbass, what is being transported ... and the devil only knows !!!
  14. komrad.klim
    komrad.klim 26 May 2014 10: 41
    +4
    To be precise.
    The Ukrainian Armed Forces do not fight in Ukraine.
    In Ukraine, the civil war.
    Therefore, there is no place for the Russian Armed Forces there.
    The USA and Russia are fighting in Ukraine.
    War bears a local character of action.
    1. 11111mail.ru
      11111mail.ru 26 May 2014 20: 16
      0
      Quote: komrad.klim
      To be precise.

      1.
      Quote: komrad.klim
      The Ukrainian Armed Forces do not fight in Ukraine.

      You declare that the armed forces of the Republic of Uzbekistan do not fight. Then where did they get the loss?
      2.
      Quote: komrad.klim
      In Ukraine, the civil war.

      No objections
      3.
      Quote: komrad.klim
      Therefore not a place there is the Armed Forces of Russia.

      must not be there is the Armed Forces of Russia. So their there and not (RF Armed Forces)!
      Quote: komrad.klim
      The USA and Russia are fighting in Ukraine.

      Give a summary of the combat losses of the conflicting sides in Uraine and finally decide which of them is the United States and who is Russia! Have you observed Russian troops in / in Ukraine? Have you observed the USA troops in / in Ukraine? "Komrad.klim", "filter bazaar" is necessary. Be more precise.
  15. blackberry
    blackberry 26 May 2014 10: 44
    -6
    Quote: Standard Oil
    Nothing in itself certainly happens, that Russia supports the South-East is understandable. This is understandable, if you look at the behavior of Ukrainian punishers, curl, curl around but do not dare to take serious actions, bite, run away, it means something of a junta he knows that for crossing a certain line, reckoning will immediately follow and no NATO will save.

    This is entirely the merit of the guys fighting there. IMHO, there is no merit in this on this side of the border.
    1. esaul
      26 May 2014 10: 57
      +2
      Quote: blackberry
      This is entirely the merit of the guys fighting there. IMHO, there is no merit in this on this side of the border

      hi Who can forbid you to "dream" like that? hi love
      1. asar
        asar 26 May 2014 19: 15
        0
        BLACKBERRY! Excuse me, but you are not from there just now ?! We only have "open sources"! And what is being done along the "line of help from the Kremlin" and in what ways all this is being done, no one knows! Neither you nor me!
    2. The comment was deleted.
  16. Giant thought
    Giant thought 26 May 2014 11: 01
    +4
    It is good news that, after all, Russia helps the Russian brothers in Ukraine. We hope that this assistance will become more significant after the Ukrainian elections.
  17. kot28.ru
    kot28.ru 26 May 2014 14: 57
    +1
    I hope Esaul’s assumptions are in the top ten, the results of the guys’s work will soon be visible !!! But, unfortunately, there will be more blood, such a piece from the Westerners wants to break off! hi To fighters and reasonable citizens, just luck! Now the neo-Nazucropes will not lag behind, too much is at stake! soldier
  18. Signaller
    Signaller 26 May 2014 17: 29
    0
    Quote ---- It is obvious that only a large republic, which includes the regions of Ukrainian New Russia and autonomous Crimea, only such a large, united state, with equal rights for Ukrainians and Russians, will be able to protect the inhabitants of the southeast of modern Ukraine and prevent a bloody fire on the borders of Russia .-----
    CRIMEA is the original RUSSIAN land. To Novorissi has nothing to do. Therefore, I ask you not to scream at what does not belong to you.
    1. 11111mail.ru
      11111mail.ru 26 May 2014 20: 39
      0
      Quote: Signaller
      CRIMEA is the original RUSSIAN land. To Novorissi has nothing to do. Therefore, I ask you not to scream at what does not belong to you.

      No doubt. No objection, no one would have anything to do with NOVORISSI. Question: how can pick on what does not exist in nature?
  19. igorek45
    igorek45 26 May 2014 18: 49
    0
    As for Russia's assistance to the militias in Ukraine, it is not there and is not expected .. Why ..? Here is an interview with Anna-News correspondent Marat Musin .. I don't think anyone needs to explain who Marat Musin is ..
  20. Polarfox
    Polarfox 26 May 2014 20: 21
    0
    Friends, sign the petition to the Prosecutor General's Office to close Echo of Moscow:
    http://www.change.org/ru/петиции/роскомнадзор-генеральная-прокуратура-рф-запрети
    broadcast-echo-Moscow-prohibit-engaging in journalism-Anton-Ohr
    ex-i-victor-shenderovich # share
    1. takeshi
      takeshi 26 May 2014 21: 31
      0
      there is no such petition
  21. siberalt
    siberalt 26 May 2014 20: 24
    0
    Let Pridnestrovie be an "amorphous formation". For now, let it be. Based on the author's logic about the "subtleties of the game". So far, Russia is in the "silence" mode and rightly so. But, this still does not mean anything. And we will not consider "unrecognized" as a fuse for the initiation of GCD in Odessa, also in the same logic. Although it's not a secret for anyone that this is not at all the case. It seems that now the policy of Belarus is more important, starting from South Ossetia with Crimea, etc. throughout the southeast of the neighboring republic. Yes, and Germany with n * sheks must be prepared for inevitably historical events. Something like this.
    Thanks to the author for the article!
  22. sergkar
    sergkar 26 May 2014 22: 46
    0
    Has anyone seen US official confirmation that Ukraine has their mercenaries? What junta is controlled by the CIA?
    So why did you decide that the leadership of the Russian Federation will beat itself in the chest and shout: - Yes! There are our "specialists" in Ukraine! Yes! We help them in every way!
    At least it would be stupid! After all, everyone is aware that politics is a very dirty business!