Military Review

Cannot be refused?

42
On the issue of Russia's compliance with international agreements on arms control and military activities


As soon as Moscow decisively declared its national interests in the post-Soviet space, Russia's relations with the West deteriorated. Nevertheless, the Russian Federation continues to fulfill its serious obligations under a number of treaties (agreements) that allow it to monitor the state and daily activities of our Armed Forces, both conventional and strategic nuclear ones. At the same time, the introduction of a moratorium on their execution by Russia could greatly influence the position of Western leaders.

The return of Crimea to the Russian Federation was perceived in the West as a direct challenge, an encroachment on hegemony, primarily of the United States. Unilaterally, the United States, the EU, and NATO cease cooperation with Russia in a number of areas, there are calls to punish Moscow, and new sanctions are being phased in step by step. NATO announced the suspension of the entire complex of military and civilian cooperation with Russia. The groups of troops of the bloc in Poland, Romania, and the Baltic States are intensifying, the warships of the US Navy are moving into the Black Sea.

Russian leaders of high rank are defamatory in humiliating form, some gatekeepers block their entry to the institutions of international organizations. Private firms join on to official blockade actions undertaken by the governments of Western countries on their own initiative.

The likely opponent in the person of the so-called Western partners of Russia openly outlined his plans, the absence of a tough reaction from the Russian side encourages his actions. The situation is somewhat reminiscent of 22 June 1941, when the Germans were already bombing Kiev and Minsk, and trains with bread and oil continued to go to Germany from the USSR.

Blood interest

The Medium and Shorter Range (INF) Treaty of 1987 of the Year, the 1992 Open Skies Treaty of the Year, the START-3 Treaty of the 2010 of the Year and the Vienna Document of the 2011 of the Year are critically interested in complying with all these treaties (agreements).

Under the Open Skies Treaty, in order to control military activities, inspectors of approximately 35 countries - from Canada to the Baltic states - can fly over Russian territory, carrying out surveillance using onboard optical and other control equipment. Russian observers, of course, also have the right to make similar overflights of other countries, but the inequality here is obvious, given the non-offensive nature of the Russian Military doctrine. Spraying control over dozens of countries is inefficient, so the value of the information obtained in this way for Russian defense is relative.

The INF Treaty was concluded in conditions when no one questioned the status of the USSR as a great power, and for that time its signing might have made sense. Today, according to the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces, it is likely that regional conflicts will arise on the borders of Russia, in which the use of missiles with a range of 500 – 5500 kilometers could have a decisive influence on the outcome of the hostilities. The question of withdrawing from the INF Treaty and restoring the dismantled production lines of such missiles has been repeatedly raised by domestic experts.

As for the START-3 Treaty, there are two main circumstances to bear in mind.

First, with the natural decline of Russian strategic offensive weapons, Americans would surely go to a proportional reduction of their nuclear warheads. Carefully counting the money, the American Congress, as a rule, refuses to allocate funds to maintain surplus weapons, in this case strategic nuclear weapons. Especially since back in the 90s, American experts considered it sufficient for the US to have just such a number of nuclear warheads as provided for by the START-3 Treaty. Therefore, it is completely counterproductive to assert that this treaty was a great victory for Russian diplomacy, since it allegedly forced the United States to reduce their nuclear arsenal. This is self-deception.

Secondly, the most important circumstance is that compliance with the START-3 Treaty allows the Americans to exercise careful continuous monitoring of the state of Russia's strategic nuclear forces, their combat readiness and control system. This is especially valuable for the United States in an environment where the Russian Defense Ministry set a course for the transfer of a significant part of domestic strategic nuclear weapons to mobile (wheel ground and railway) status.

From this point of view, the signing of the START-3 Treaty, its observance in the setting of the actually revived Cold War seem to be a strategic mistake made as a result of a shallow analysis of global development trends.

However, the most incomprehensible motives are those for which Russia signed the Vienna Document 2011 on confidence- and security-building measures developed under the auspices of the OSCE. This document actually replaced the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe, the implementation of which lost its meaning after the collapse of the USSR and the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact.

Viennese waltz

The Vienna Document, which was not considered within the walls of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation, meanwhile involves regular exchange with the OSCE countries of information about the armed forces, armaments, the daily activities of troops, military exercises, plans for the development of armed forces, military expenditures, etc. Here, for example, Russia is obliged to provide information on each formation and combat unit of ground forces up to a brigade / regiment or equivalent level, inclusive:

- name and subordination;
- is it regular (oops) or irregular (oops);
- place the usual location of peacetime of his (her) headquarters, indicating the exact geographical names and coordinates to the nearest 10 seconds;
-the number of personnel in peacetime states;
-Main standard weapons and equipment systems with an indication of the amount of each type (combat tanks, helicopters, armored combat vehicles, anti-tank guided missile launchers, permanently mounted / integral parts of armored vehicles, self-propelled and towed artillery guns, mortars and multiple launch rocket systems of a caliber of 100 millimeters and above, tank bridge spacers).


The same data is required from us on the Air Force, aviation Air defense and naval aviation.

Confirming data should be sent to the OSCE governing bodies also on the tactical and technical characteristics and distinctive features of the main domestic systems. weapons and military equipment - battle tanks, armored combat vehicles, armored personnel carriers and infantry combat vehicles, anti-tank guided missile launchers, self-propelled and towed artillery, mortars and volley fire systems, combat aircraft and helicopters.

Obligations to provide information on the content of military doctrines, plans for the deployment of the main weapon systems and equipment, moving and changing the deployment of troops, plans and scale of military exercises, as well as procedures for conducting inspections and visits to air bases are particularly detailed in the Vienna Document.

It is known for what purpose in 1940, the German mountain shooters from the Edelweiss division massively in the guise of tourists and climbers visited the Soviet North Caucasus.

On the whole, the content of this document obliges Russia to widely declare virtually secret information about the state of its Armed Forces, their numerical and combat strength, deployment and combat deployment plans. It is clear that Western countries exchange such information: there are no serious contradictions between them, most of them belong to the same military and economic blocs, and they are all ready to oppose Russia on a consolidated basis.

The position and actions of the United States and united Europe, taken by them in response to the annexation of Crimea to Russia, convince us that the above-mentioned international agreements on arms limitation and control over military activities turned into an anachronism that must be disposed of. Russia alone, virtually without allies, should not voluntarily weaken its defense potential, providing the likely adversary with the most valuable strategic information. Historically, the intelligence community has always been engaged in obtaining such information.

Today, there is every reason to correct mistakes, to refuse to perform contracts concluded to the detriment of their own security in the post-Soviet period, based on the development of equal partnership with Western countries.
Author:
Originator:
http://vpk-news.ru/articles/20242
42 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Samaritan
    Samaritan 16 May 2014 19: 56
    +43
    NATO REFUSED to cooperate with us, why should we dance to their tune! Let yourself cram your demands along with sanctions.

    By the way, today Russia withdrew another 26 billion from US funds, totaling 53 billion this year.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Vitaly Anisimov
      Vitaly Anisimov 16 May 2014 20: 01
      +12
      Quote: Samaritan
      NATO REFUSED to cooperate with us, why should we dance to their tune! Let yourself cram your demands along with sanctions.

      In short, Russia rules .. And no one and nothing will stop us.! Tired of all this squeal of hysterics .. We don’t like to wet it (so far morally ..) and we'll see .. The fun time for the Russian soul begins .. Masks were thrown off and we finally understood .. (who is not hiding we are not to blame)))) ) negative
      1. Hariva
        Hariva 16 May 2014 20: 21
        +3
        Quote: MIKHAN
        Quote: Samaritan
        NATO REFUSED to cooperate with us, why should we dance to their tune! Let yourself cram your demands along with sanctions.

        In short, Russia rules .. And no one and nothing will stop us.!

        Nda. Hard to stop the overclocked freight.
        1. zanoza
          zanoza 16 May 2014 20: 41
          +8
          Quote: Hariva
          ... hard to stop ...

          It is necessary to suspend the implementation of these agreements for the period of their sanctions.
          They imposed on us until November, which means that until November we will "slow down" the fulfillment of our obligations in those areas where the West is interested in fulfilling them.
          We must begin to find their weak points and put pressure on this "sore corn" ... yes
          1. MirVlad
            MirVlad 16 May 2014 22: 39
            0
            YES! The only way. Like in aikido: use the strength of the arisen opponent to the detriment of him! Even somehow it became a shame! It seems they were partners ...
      2. Serg 122
        Serg 122 16 May 2014 20: 32
        +2
        In short, Russia rules .. And no one and nothing will stop us!
        Rospatent received an application for registration of the Green Men brand
        Rospatent received an application for registration of the Green Men brand from an individual entrepreneur Ignat Ivanov, RIA Novosti reports on Friday, May 16.
        “The applicant asks for the Green Men brand to be assigned to him, made in the standard Cyrillic font,” the agency told Rospatent.
        In accordance with the procedure, after filing an application for registration of brands, the Patent Office conducts a trademark examination within a month, followed by examination of the claimed designation, which does not have time limits. According to experts, from the time of filing the application to the issuance of registration, in the case of a positive decision, it takes about a year.

        smile laughing wassat
      3. MirVlad
        MirVlad 16 May 2014 22: 36
        0
        Masks were thrown off! Jesuit politics and brainwashing1 The practical mind, common sense of our government should be manifested in the rejection of such informative Western supporters in Europe. Americans really do not care about the rest! Profit, profit above all. Like nothing personal - only business. Or we are for democracy, but if you do not give the market, it WILL Hurt! The opportunity to make big profits has no ethical, altruistic or any other philanthropic restrictions on US imperialist hegemony
    3. 1812 1945
      1812 1945 16 May 2014 22: 29
      +2
      Quote: Samaritan
      NATO REFUSED to cooperate with us, why should we dance to their tune! Let yourself cram your demands along with sanctions.

      All contracts were not for our benefit. Only now, at least someone, suddenly - saw the light! The wild scale of corruption was the reason that even those who were initially aware of it - as a military specialist - remained silent. Some - for money, some - out of fear for the life of relatives and friends ... And also - because of stupidity and incompetence. If not now, then when else to get rid of the consequences of self-interest, betrayal and stupidity. NATO itself has created all the conditions for this. The article is surprisingly candid. "Plus" - of course.
    4. schizophrenic
      schizophrenic 17 May 2014 01: 11
      0
      Panic article. The Vienna Agreement was used to prepare for action in Ukraine, remember what panic NATO raised, and how it broke off. As well as a plan for deployment of parts, a bag of documents comes and all plans change.
  2. Predator
    Predator 16 May 2014 19: 57
    +12
    It’s high time to score on these contracts, to take it and get out! You need to think about yourself, and let the rest think about it!
  3. Roman Skomorokhov
    Roman Skomorokhov 16 May 2014 20: 01
    +5
    Um ... there, in Vienna, no one will crack anything on the British flag?

    Maybe just let us into the territory and give us a pass "everywhere and everywhere"?

    Let them deal with their four letters (LGBT), and we will take care of our own (MLRS).

    No, well, finally insolent.
  4. mamont5
    mamont5 16 May 2014 20: 02
    +8
    “Today there is every reason to correct mistakes, to refuse to fulfill agreements concluded to the detriment of our own security in the post-Soviet period, counting on the development of equal partnership with Western countries.”

    Yes, send them all away, on the basis of their own sanctions. Enemies mean enemies.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Vitaly Anisimov
      Vitaly Anisimov 16 May 2014 20: 26
      +4
      "Russians have always been underestimated, and yet they know how to keep secrets not only from enemies, but also from friends."

      Churchill
      And now it is ..! Just try poking around (surprise will be unexpected) Read the classics of degenerates!
  5. Rurikovich
    Rurikovich 16 May 2014 20: 03
    +11
    It is high time to throw off this noose in the form of various kinds of obligations and agreements with the West! They do not follow them very much, and if they do, then in their direction. Chuckling around the corner and rubbing his hands. Stop being naive and gullible. "Partners" have long since openly shown their essence and trusting them is dearer to yourself. The INF treaty can generally be scrapped, and then Geyropa will think about his behavior. 3,14ndostan on missile defense generally lays down and what he wants, then he does under childish pretexts. It's time to start showing your pride. Otherwise, the NATO border will soon pass in Moscow. Otherwise, we must (simply must) take into account their concerns, and our concerns for them are a violation of various moronic rights. Ukraine is an example of this. The West only understands the language of power. The language of contracts and obligations is nothing for them. History has proven.
    And you draw conclusions ...
    hi
    1. Patriot.ru.
      Patriot.ru. 16 May 2014 22: 25
      0
      Yes, like NATO marching through the RED AREA with a bear.
      1. Rurikovich
        Rurikovich 17 May 2014 00: 26
        0
        Marching or braided ??? These are different things. repeat
      2. Horn
        Horn 17 May 2014 07: 19
        0
        Only Germans can march in NATO. The rest go.
  6. petrT
    petrT 16 May 2014 20: 05
    +4
    Well, not everything is so sad, not all of ours tell us about their presence. If everything was bolted, then what's the point of banning the military going abroad? After all, everyone knows that even selling various military products abroad, it is an order of magnitude different from what it is armed with in its own country.
  7. mig31
    mig31 16 May 2014 20: 06
    +3
    Russia, the most law-abiding country in the world, has nothing to cover, and this infuriates shitcrats and liberals who are mired in lies and violation of their own created "rights of lawlessness" for the rest of the world ...
  8. thinker
    thinker 16 May 2014 20: 07
    +2
    The situation is somewhat reminiscent of June 22, 1941, when the Germans had already bombed Kiev and Minsk, and trains with bread and oil continued to go from Germany to the USSR.

    Pretty stern comparison!
    And if you can't put a comma after it, what a howl the "democrats" will raise!
    I put a plus, but big doubts about the correctness of such a step. hi
  9. Barboskin
    Barboskin 16 May 2014 20: 07
    +6
    There are two options: either spoil relations with the West or they ruin our life. In general, Russia is great, but nowhere to retreat, our cause is just, we will win.
  10. VADEL
    VADEL 16 May 2014 20: 08
    +5
    Viennese waltz

    You need to send them ... Lambada let them dance with each other.
    1. Penzyac
      Penzyac 16 May 2014 21: 37
      +1
      Quote: VADEL
      Viennese waltz

      You need to send them ... Lambada let them dance with each other.

      The West has a favorite dance - "Genka-Enka", moreover, the USA is the back one. smile
  11. old man
    old man 16 May 2014 20: 09
    +4
    Yes, judging by the latest events, many treaties concluded before the collapse of the USSR and even after it must be revised. Our "partners" showed their essence and "values ​​of truth and democracy."
    With them it is necessary on the principle of "nothing personal, only business", the rest is adyu may baby.
  12. 11111mail.ru
    11111mail.ru 16 May 2014 20: 17
    +2
    all reasons to correct mistakes, refuse to fulfill contracts concluded to the detriment of one’s own security in the post-Soviet period, counting on development equal partnership with Western countries. Author Nikolay Kolomeytsev

    What agreement to conclude with crooks? We know who concluded those contracts and to whom it was beneficial! These are thimbles! No contact with the enemies!
  13. Tanechka-clever
    Tanechka-clever 16 May 2014 20: 21
    +5
    The less you respect yourself, the less your opponent respects you. For example, Poland is a soap bubble, but has swollen to the extent that, she believes, give the right to put Russia in its place, and the EU to indicate what to do.
    1. Penzyac
      Penzyac 16 May 2014 21: 42
      0
      Quote: Tanya-umunechka
      ... Poland is a soap bubble, but swollen ...

      Once the bubble has inflated, it will burst soon (or deflate), such a sign. wassat
    2. psg72
      psg72 16 May 2014 21: 48
      0
      You probably forgot to add about the "country of pribatiki".
  14. v245721
    v245721 16 May 2014 20: 22
    +6
    stop crying 1 !!! Russia, I must say a huge thank you, the United States and Europe for this vaudeville. Otherwise, Russia completely fell asleep under the false fairy tales of "Scheherazade Merkel".
  15. Vitaly Anisimov
    Vitaly Anisimov 16 May 2014 20: 29
    +2
    Quote: v245721
    stop crying 1 !!! Russia, I must say a huge thank you, the United States and Europe for this vaudeville. Otherwise, Russia completely fell asleep under the false fairy tales of "Scheherazade Merkel".

    Honest Pioneer Thank you! Woke up finally .. soldier
  16. skayl
    skayl 16 May 2014 20: 30
    +2
    Still, what kind of sphere would the West block, so that Russia would budge!
  17. nomad74
    nomad74 16 May 2014 20: 34
    +4
    Vienna document not considered by the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation what an anti-people, treacherous document! Yes, and behind the scenes signed! Refuse! The reasons are full! Wherever you spit the reason!
    1. Penzyac
      Penzyac 16 May 2014 21: 47
      +1
      Quote: nomad74
      Vienna document not considered by the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation what an anti-people, treacherous document! Yes, and behind the scenes signed! Refuse! The reasons are full! Wherever you spit the reason!

      By the way, the formal reason is that the document has not been ratified. And the ratification process is not fast, our parliament is a place for discussion. smile
  18. Velesovich
    Velesovich 16 May 2014 20: 40
    +4
    The INF Treaty must of course be sent to scrap. The United States is surrounded by oceans; they need not, by and large, such missiles. And Russia has nearby Japan, China, the European countries of NATO. When this agreement was concluded, the Warsaw bloc existed, and the mighty Soviet Armed Forces, even without the Russian Railways, could let anyone out at any time. Today the situation is fundamentally different. And without such weapons, it will be very difficult for us to restrain the very Chinese.
    1. Penzyac
      Penzyac 16 May 2014 21: 56
      0
      Quote: Velesovic
      The INF Treaty, of course, must be sent to the scrap ... And without such weapons it will be very difficult for us to restrain the very Chinese.

      By the way, this is a good excuse for the West, because they are afraid of China, they say, we are also afraid. And there is also North Korea, Iran ... But you never know? ... Let the West calm down, let's say how they do to us: "It's not against you." hi
  19. Barboskin
    Barboskin 16 May 2014 20: 42
    +1
    Quote: v245721
    stop crying 1 !!! Russia, I must say a huge thank you, the United States and Europe for this vaudeville. Otherwise, Russia completely fell asleep under the false fairy tales of "Scheherazade Merkel".

    I agree. I must say thanks to Bolotny, Maydanuty, the European Union, the United States. Thanks to them, we remembered that we are a great nation, patriotism has awakened, and most importantly we are together again, we are one.
    1. Tanechka-clever
      Tanechka-clever 16 May 2014 21: 21
      +2
      Quote: Barboskin
      say thanks to Bolotny, Maydanuty, EU, USA

      Personally, I am against - they will not wait from me, personally, I never doubted that we are a great nation. But for Crimea, I will thank the Crimeans and glorious heroes - "green men" - so inconspicuous, but noticeable in their deeds. And if in order to understand that "we are a great nation" you need Maxim "swamp" - then look at Ukraine and to what the Maidans lead - "swamp" and it is clear how everything could end in Moscow. Navalny already had fighters ready and he does not hide it. Glory to our people's militia, I can't even call it the police.
    2. Tanechka-clever
      Tanechka-clever 16 May 2014 21: 21
      +1
      Quote: Barboskin
      say thanks to Bolotny, Maydanuty, EU, USA

      Personally, I am against - they will not wait from me, personally, I never doubted that we are a great nation. But for Crimea, I will thank the Crimeans and glorious heroes - "green men" - so inconspicuous, but noticeable in their deeds. And if in order to understand that "we are a great nation" you need Maxim "swamp" - then look at Ukraine and to what the Maidans lead - "swamp" and it is clear how everything could end in Moscow. Navalny already had fighters ready and he does not hide it. Glory to our people's militia, I can't even call it the police.
      1. Barboskin
        Barboskin 16 May 2014 22: 05
        0
        Tanya, I completely agree with you, + to you. But we knew this on our own, and now we have become together, all these events have united us.
      2. Combitor
        Combitor 16 May 2014 23: 04
        +1
        Quote: Tanya-umunechka
        look at Ukraine and what the Maidans lead to - "swamp" and it is clear how everything could end in Moscow

        (+) for the comment. Totally agree with you. I am not a 100% supporter of Putin and I am far from thinking to idolize him. But for the "Ukrainian" policy I respect him and fully support him. And somehow it’s uncomfortable from the thought of what would have happened and how Russia would have behaved if the presidency was not GDP, but someone else (Yavlinsky, Mironov, Navalny (mind you!)).
        Even now, when the West is raging and has tried all methods of pressure against us, from Russia - everything is clear, balanced, calm and judicious. Until the west in the intestines and rectum runs out of g ... but, he will not calm down. Therefore, our "supreme" behaves calmly. Why waste your nerves on idiots when spring is running out and the "spring aggravation" will end by itself. And there, and treatment can be done.
    3. psg72
      psg72 16 May 2014 21: 59
      +1
      Add and the state remembered the army and navy.
  20. Giant thought
    Giant thought 16 May 2014 20: 50
    +1
    Spit on everyone, gay men, mattresses, it is necessary to do what is beneficial primarily to Russia.
  21. vsoltan
    vsoltan 16 May 2014 21: 01
    0
    The return of Crimea to the Russian Federation was perceived in the West as a direct challenge, an encroachment on hegemony, primarily of the United States. Unilaterally, the United States, the EU, and NATO cease cooperation with Russia in a number of areas, there are calls to punish Moscow, and new sanctions are being phased in step by step. NATO announced the suspension of the entire complex of military and civilian cooperation with Russia. The groups of troops of the bloc in Poland, Romania, and the Baltic States are intensifying, the warships of the US Navy are moving into the Black Sea.
    Yes, bullshit - all their impotent actions and liberal screams .... the return of the Crimea, and the possible - the South-East, they are annoyed precisely as an "encroachment" on hegemony .... a real interest in the sale of shale gas in the light of the possible mess at our side
  22. Tanechka-clever
    Tanechka-clever 16 May 2014 21: 06
    +1
    Quote: MIKHAN
    Read the classics of degenerates

    Who reads the classics today - today everyone is sitting on the Internet - it’s time to upload classics on the forums - to remind and enlighten
  23. Walk
    Walk 16 May 2014 21: 06
    +2
    It is necessary to review all international agreements signed during the reign of Gorbachev-Yeltsin. Yes, and the Constitution of the Russian Federation, written under dictation from phashington, would be nice to rewrite again in the interests of Russia.
  24. suharev-52
    suharev-52 16 May 2014 21: 08
    +2
    It is necessary to refuse, but ... culturally, in compliance with all legal and international rights. Sincerely.
  25. jovanni
    jovanni 16 May 2014 21: 11
    +2
    Europe is seriously ill. She has megalomania. They are trying to teach everyone to live. We urgently need to treat our European friends, and withdrawing from the INF Treaty is an effective medicine.
  26. sv68
    sv68 16 May 2014 21: 23
    0
    you need to get out of all contracts and no longer take on stupid contracts and restrictions; stop dancing to the tune of someone else
  27. jktu66
    jktu66 16 May 2014 21: 29
    +1
    I heard on the radio - they are going to increase excise taxes on fuel, I do not understand the logic of our economists. Having cosmogonic hydrocarbon reserves and Russian open spaces, excise taxes can be reduced to a minimum for the domestic market. Cheap fuel will stimulate the development of the transport network, reduce the cost of delivering goods from Russian manufacturers and, accordingly, improve the competitiveness of the industry. WHERE IS THE LOGIC?!!!
  28. Arkuda
    Arkuda 16 May 2014 21: 30
    0
    We’ll arrange a crash test for our partners soon. May force and will come with us.
  29. Arkuda
    Arkuda 16 May 2014 21: 37
    0
    Quote: suharev-52
    It is necessary to refuse, but ... culturally, in compliance with all legal and international rights. Sincerely.

    Politely, I would say.
  30. Palych9999
    Palych9999 16 May 2014 21: 47
    0
    Good documents have signed ours in "bit" times ...
    Our "specialists" on signing gas contracts with the Outskirts never dreamed of such a thing ...
  31. Baikal
    Baikal 16 May 2014 21: 48
    +4
    I have never wanted sanctions against Russia as it is now.
    Come on, dear ones. When Russia silently gets up and leaves the number of so-called "civilized countries", then you will howl, ub ... ki. And crawl on your knees. Answer ...
  32. Nitarius
    Nitarius 16 May 2014 21: 48
    +2
    SEND NECESSARY AND LOWER BELOW THE BOARD! so that we are not the USSR and this will not happen again!
    NOTHING BRAIN to love! THEY ARE CLOSER TO OUR BORDERS!

    THEY ALSO -NATO promised not to move! And in RESULT ??? UNDER SIDE!
    SEND IN THE BACK ... AND EXIT THE AGREEMENT! UNTIL IT'S NOT TOO LATE!
  33. Mih
    Mih 16 May 2014 21: 50
    0
    Russia alone, practically without allies, should not voluntarily weaken its defense potential, providing a potential adversary with valuable strategic information. Historically, intelligence communities have always been engaged in the extraction of such information.
    stop
    I do not understand such jokes!
  34. Arkuda
    Arkuda 16 May 2014 21: 55
    0
    Quote: Palych9999
    Good documents have signed ours in "bit" times ...
    Our "specialists" on signing gas contracts with the Outskirts never dreamed of such a thing ...

    Even the names of the signatories are known: Kasyanov, Nemtsov, Gaidar, Chubais ...
  35. A1L9E4K9S
    A1L9E4K9S 16 May 2014 21: 59
    0
    To get out of all the agreements to hell with dogs, all the same, only we alone complied with them, and the US people only pretended to comply. In the Soviet Union, yes, they respected both sides, and after the collapse they spat on Russia, still pay attention to it.
  36. Arkuda
    Arkuda 16 May 2014 22: 03
    0
    By the way, to hold a general, voluntary-compulsory screening of the documentary film by Galina Tsareva "The Fall of Europe" http://video.yandex.ru/users/iosif7777777/view/2/
  37. andj61
    andj61 16 May 2014 22: 07
    0
    Plus the article.
    It is very important to note that Gorbachev, concluding an agreement on INF, went much further than the Americans hoped: we went to destroy 1846 complexes, the Americans - 846. At the same time, the Americans removed perching1 (up to 800 km) and perching 2 (up to 1770 km), and ours only RSD-10, which had no analogues (5000 km range - no worse than poplar, but shoots closer) destroyed more than 500 complexes. It’s just not clear why it was necessary to destroy the OTRK-23 Oka? She has a range of up to 500 km. In practice, this is the predecessor of Iskander, and very good.
    We need to refuse these agreements. Now we can’t get Europe at all. Strategists - for the USA, and for Europe - only Tu22M2, M3?
    And the Vienna accords are in general darkness! Who and why took them is not clear.
  38. pvv113
    pvv113 16 May 2014 22: 11
    +5
    Maybe enough to disarm and it's time to think about your own security?
  39. Vorodis_vA
    Vorodis_vA 17 May 2014 00: 08
    0
    the main thing is not to be shy about your systems ... missile complexes.
  40. uzer 13
    uzer 13 17 May 2014 02: 16
    0
    What agreements can be with enemies?
  41. kot28.ru
    kot28.ru 17 May 2014 02: 43
    0
    The whole world is in trash !!! soldierIt is time to unilaterally withdraw from these enslaving treaties signed under humpback and ben! yes