Project "Ukrainian Reich". How can the West respond to Russia's actions
Russians! I now appeal to all Russians, residents of Ukraine and Belarus in the Balkans are also considered Russians. Look at us and remember - they will do the same with you when you separate and give up the slack. West - chain mad dog clings to your throat. Brothers, remember the fate of Yugoslavia! Do not let do the same to you!
Slobodan Milosevic.
The centuries-old work of the Western “elites” in splitting a single super-ethnos Russov led to the possibility of the emergence of the “Ukrainian Reich”. The owners of the West were able to create a chimera called "Ukrainians" who hate their brothers and are ready to fight with them. In fact, the West was able to create a “free and democratic”, Russophobic Ukraine, which opposes itself to the “totalitarian” “Moscow Empire”.
The project "neo-Nazi Ukraine" can be compared with the project "Third Reich", which was created by the Anglo-Saxon branch of the western "elites". Only there is a difference in terms, the Third Reich was created in a very short time. True, using a serious xenophobic, racist, revanchist base that existed in Germany in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. The project "Ukraine" was created for several centuries, since the occupation of the western and south-western Russian lands by Lithuania, Poland and Hungary. Initially, the main violin in the creation of the matrix (psycho-cultural type) of the “Ukrainian people” was played by the Vatican, using Poland for this. Then the security services of the Austro-Hungarian Empire and the German Empire and the Third Reich actively worked on this project. Later the Anglo-Saxons (London and Washington) began to use this tool.
Now in stories the project “Ukraine” a new stage - the creation of a political force of a neo-Nazi nature, which should take on the main burden of the struggle against “imperial Russia”, to maximally weaken it. It is also necessary to take into account the second force that is confronted with the Russian civilization - radical Islam. The Russian state is confronted on three fronts - the Ukrainian, Caucasian and Central Asian fronts. At the same time, we have a developed underground Islamists, national separatists in Russia itself. Plus a powerful social base of millions of migrants from the Caucasus and Central Asia. Now dozens (possibly hundreds of thousands, millions, with the radicalization of the conflict) refugees from Ukraine will be added to them. The FMS has already announced the number in 140 of thousands of refugees from Ukraine. According to the FMS, 143 thousands of applications for political asylum in Russia were filed only in the last two weeks of February. And the conflict has just begun, all the flowers are still ahead. It is clear that among the refugees there can be ideological Bandera, enemy agents and saboteurs. This is a war. Building the work of Smersh-2 is a vital necessity.
The masters of the West, as usual, are trying to solve the problem with someone else’s hands and using the resources of others. Earlier, the Anglo-Saxons set off Russia with Sweden, Germany (the Anglo-Saxons' competitors are the Germanic-Romance branch of the western “elite”), and Japan. Earlier, with other Slavs - Poland. With representatives of Islamic civilization - Turkey and Persia. At the same time, Russia actually did not fight with the British and Americans. In fact, the British entered into combat contact only during the Eastern (Crimean) War.
Now they are facing Russia with Ukraine. In order for the final solution of the “Russian question” to occur by the forces of the Rus (Slavs) themselves, with the subsequent collapse of Ukraine, the Russian Federation, the appropriation of its territory, the resources that are necessary for the survival of the West. They are trying to turn Ukraine into an anti-Russian bridgehead, finally tearing it away from Russian civilization.
At the same time, there is a clash between European and Russian civilizations with the Islamic world, along the North-South line. What should finish off the white race as a whole and lead to the creation of a New World Order. The old civilizations - Western Europe, Russia, the Islamic world, India and China in the course of a systematically unfolding world conflict they want to destroy, creating another world on their ruins. The world is completely controlled by several hundreds of clan-families, which should become for the remnants of mankind "gods", possessing the most advanced technologies. The main obstacle in the way of building such a non-slave-owning civilization is the Russian civilization, the superethnos of the Rus. Russia has the potential to build a different society, more equitable and humane, built on the basis of social justice, the disclosure of the creative potential of man. Therefore, most of the world media controlled by the owners of the West, with such hatred and applies to the Russian, Russia.
It should be noted that in the process of preparation and implementation of the “February Revolution” in Ukraine, the United States and the European Union countries very clearly and did not hesitate to show hypocrisy, Russophobia and double standards. "Tolerant and Humane" Western Europe completely closed its eyes to the Nazi symbols, slogans and the program of neo-Bandera organizations. Germany has prepared for Ukraine a new Führer - Klitschko. True, he has little chance of becoming the leader of Ukraine. There are more intelligent and dangerous candidates. The United States went even further and, with the help of the Ukrainian security service, prepared troops of well-trained Ukrainian Nazi militants. The preparation process took more than one year, but the results are good. The Nazi militants literally swept away the Ukrainian official power rotted into theft and lack of will (the Yanukovych regime).
The logic of the Westernizers is simple, while the Nazis in Ukraine, and in the Baltic States, oppose Russia, then nothing dangerous. We can also recall the fact that the Anglo-Saxons, in fact, fostered Hitler and the Nazi regime in Germany, brought the National Socialists to power, sponsored them and supported them, set the Reich against the USSR. After the defeat of the Third Reich in 1945, the Americans and the British, with the support of the Russophobic Vatican, the Franco regime in Spain and “neutral” Switzerland, did everything to get the most valuable scientific, managerial and intelligence personnel of the Nazis (including war criminals) out of attack, transferring from to USA, Latin American countries and North Africa. They were then actively used in the fight against the USSR.
The USA became the main organizers of the "February Revolution" (neo-Nazi coup). At the same time, one should not turn a blind eye to the obvious facts; during the preparation of this revolution, objective factors were used, such as the corruption and weakness of the intellectual resource of the Yanukovych regime. Hate or indifference to a large part of the population. Yanukovych, through his actions, even betrayed his social base in the south-east of the country, with the help of which they came to power. The West, and above all the United States, exerted a powerful pressure on Yanukovich, his entourage, not allowing Kiev to carry out an anti-terrorist operation and crush the Neo-Ado insurgency in the bud. It could be suppressed by the forces of the "Berkut" and the Security Service of Ukraine, but they did not allow the militants to be finished.
The United States, and the West as a whole, used the huge backlog that was made in previous years - backstage talks with politicians and businessmen, working with the Ukrainian elite, which kept the looted money in the West, created “spare airfields” there, in the form of bills and real estate , sent there to study and live children, families, created the Bandera underground. It is impossible to deny the direct participation of Western instructors in the Kiev events. Dozens of American, German, Polish instructors became the organizers and coordinators of the "revolution". Western ambassadors and various kinds of emissaries in the most critical period simply dictated to Kiev how to behave, pushing through defeatist and “tolerant” decisions at the very moment when it was necessary to firmly establish order in the country.
The Ukrainian oligarchs have also become an ally of the West in creating the neo-Nazi regime in Ukraine. In this process, we again see the similarity of the situation with the project "Third Reich". German big business and bankers supported the National Socialists and Hitler. Ukrainian oligarchs supported the "February revolution." So, Arsen Avakov became the head of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. His fortune in 2008 was estimated at 385 million dollars. The state of Yu. Tymoshenko is estimated at several billion dollars. Oligarchs began to be appointed governors: Igor Kolomoisky became the head of the Dnipropetrovsk region, Sergey Taruta, etc., became the Donetsk head.
If the West and its clients in Ukraine succeed, then it can be said that the goal, to which they have stubbornly pursued since 1991, will be achieved. Already, our enemies have achieved great success - they were able to unleash a new conflict (the “Ukrainian Front”) on the territory of Russian civilization. In the future, we can get either the “Yugoslav scenario” near the borders of Russia, with the active participation of external forces (the West and Russia), or the “Ukrainian Reich” in the West of Ukraine, which is in alliance with Poland (Polish script Russian blitzkrieg) and the pro-Nazi Baltic republics will oppose Russia.
It should be noted that in its economic, demographic and combat potential, Nazi Ukraine, with external support, is fully capable of resisting Russia. Especially with the support of the Polish and Romanian "elites" who are building "Great Romania and Great Poland", the Baltic states, which are fully oriented towards the USA, creating a Russophobic, anti-Russian belt in Eastern Europe. Perhaps this block will also include Finland (and Sweden), which has recently headed for strengthening the defense potential. It is clear that this is not an open, “hot” war, but a conflict of a “Syrian type.”
NATO in such a conflict will also support the Neanderovites, as the West supports Islamist gangs from Syria. So, the White House has already expressed its readiness to support "significant" financial assistance to the Ukrainian government in order to support Ukraine "in pursuit of a democratic future." And the Vice-President of the Atlantic Council, Damon Wilson, said that the US Congress was considering the possibility of giving Ukraine a defensive weapons. We remember very well what the support of the United States and the West as a whole of the aspirations of the Iraqi, Libyan and Syrian people "towards a democratic future" and the supply of weapons to these areas - Iraq, Libya and Syria - are in ruins. Even earlier, a “democratic future” was built in Yugoslavia.
Nonsense about the nuclear missile potential of Russia, which supposedly can stop any war, is not worth talking about. No one will use this weapon. This is a “last chance” weapon. The war will have a “network character”, a “rebellious” character, with the opening in Russia of many of the “abscesses” that have accumulated because of Moscow’s system errors. Suffice it to recall the Wahhabi underground in Russia, the alarming situation along the Volga route (Volgograd - Kazan). On the gangster and Islamist underground in Dagestan and other Caucasian republics.
It should also be borne in mind that the current Russian Federation can not be compared with the USSR in any area. Neither by the military, nor by the economic, nor by the demographic potential, nor by the quality of the management corps and population (the result of the destruction of the Soviet system of education and upbringing). And with the allies is not thick.
Even if the West can not create a neo-Nazi state in Ukraine. And in Ukraine, the government of Yanukovych or a similar character will be restored, and Kiev will continue the policy of “sitting on two chairs”, The West has already completed its minimum program anyway. The de-veterization and de-Russification of Ukraine will be continued, but by milder methods. The world media got the image of “bloody, imperial Mordor”, which attacked the “freedom-loving and democratic” Ukraine, occupied the Crimea, wants to send troops to the east of Ukraine. Bonfire information war against Russia will receive a new "food". They say, “Mordor is reborn,” first bent over poor and innocent Georgia, now striving for the restoration of the empire, Russia offends the “democratic” Ukraine. The process of information training to turn Russia into the main enemy of the “democratic world community” is in full swing.
So, one of the indirect fruits of this information war against Russia and the aggravation of relations between Russia and the United States, the West as a whole, will be the transition of the United States to a tougher foreign policy model and the president. Who will be the new president of the United States, Mrs. Clinton, the lady is clearly Russophobic, or whoever is not important. American presidents are always henchmen of the financial and industrial "elite". The main thing is that we are waiting for the aggravation of relations with the United States.
How the West can respond to the actions of Russia
It is clear that a military decision on the situation in Ukraine, apparently, is the only possible answer in the current military-political situation. Moscow's non-interference would be a frank betrayal of Russian national interests. Especially given the fairly active resistance of the common population in the Crimea and the south-eastern regions of Little Russia. It was no longer possible to wait. Southeast can not be given over to the power of the Neanderders
Further options are possible: 1) Russia will limit itself to the Crimea, which will formally remain part of Ukraine and will not become part of Russia. In fact, the Crimea will take on the balance of Russia. In other areas, Russia's presence will be limited by moral, financial support, perhaps by volunteers. But, Russia can actively intervene if the Neanderis in the east begin terror; 2) Russia will help restore and maintain order only on parts or the entire Southeast, which will then have to decide on its future; 3) “peacekeeping operation” will affect Central Ukraine, a legitimate president will be returned to Kiev. The situation will be returned to the February 21 agreement. Yatsenyuk and the company will be put at the negotiating table with Yanukovych; 4) Russia will establish a “constitutional order” throughout Ukraine, from the eastern to the western border. Then a referendum will be held on the federal (or even almost confederative) structure of Ukraine.
After that, Russia, Belarus, Ukraine, Kazakhstan and Transnistria can create a new union state. Participation is also possible in the Central Asian republics. Given the onset of the representatives of the "Islamic project", their prospects without the active help of Russia are sad. The only possibility of survival is active participation in integration projects with Russia. Apparently, Armenia will also enter the union, this is its only opportunity to survive in the world crisis and the beginning of the first stage of the world war. Such a union can become the core of a new “imperial system” and a new, cultural, economic space that can withstand the onslaught of waves of the global systemic crisis and war. The creation of a new state education will make it possible to start a new industrialization, create a new transport, social and economic infrastructure, serve to create a new economic structure, switch to a new technological structure. An economic basis will be created for building a new type of society, oriented towards creation and service (Stalin’s experience).
Obviously, despite all the aggressiveness of the rhetoric, big words, the West will not fight with Russia. NATO will not start a "hot war" for Ukraine. Most NATO countries generally do not have classic armies for real war. They have punitive-police formations, which they are ready to use against a deliberately weak opponent who has destroyed himself from the inside. But if, God forbid, any “swamp” revolution wins in Russia, and a new “democratic” government asks for help in fighting the “Russian Nazis”, then yes, NATO will be happy to help.
In the meantime, everything is limited to "war of words". So, 2 March, the head of NATO Andres Fogh Rasmussen said that Moscow’s actions are contrary to the principles of the UN and called on Russia to help reduce tensions in Ukraine. The NATO Secretary General at an emergency meeting of the Alliance stressed that Russia's actions "pose a threat to peace and security in Europe." Anders Fogh Rasmussen said that the West supports the territorial integrity and sovereignty of the state.
American Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, in an interview with Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu, said that if Russia does not turn away from the chosen course, then “it will fall into even greater isolation in the world community. She promised political and economic isolation and the US ambassador to the UN Security Council, Samantha Power. US Secretary of State John Kerry 2 in March called Russia's desire to intervene in Ukraine’s affairs "an incredible act of aggression." Therefore, Russia's actions will have "very serious consequences" on the part of the United States and other countries. The US Secretary of State did not rule out the imposition of sanctions for the "economic isolation" of the Russian Federation. In addition, Russia is threatened with exclusion from the G8 and depriving the G8 summit in Sochi.
Obviously, the West will provide full support to the Neobanderovtsy in Ukraine, in the event of a conflict in the country with the participation of Russian armed forces. Washington has already pledged financial assistance in creating a “democratic future, and the Vice-President of the Atlantic Council of the United States, Damon Wilson, announced his readiness to provide defensive weapons to Ukraine. And in this case you do not need an official statement. The United States, Western countries and their Arab allies supplied weapons, ammunition and ammunition to various gangs without official statements. Default.
Another obvious response from the United States and the West to Russia's actions has already been announced - “economic isolation.” Unfortunately, the enemies of Russia have many trump cards here. In Russia, dealing with financial, economic and food security is much worse than that of the USSR. Thus, for the most part, the Central Bank and the financial system of the Russian Federation are in the hands of outspoken Westernizers, the pro-Western wing of the Russian “elite”. And the attack on the ruble of external and internal speculators began even before the coup in Ukraine. The economy of the Russian Federation is strongly de-industrialized, focused on raw materials exports. Another weak spot is the Russian oligarchs. Their money, real estate, children in the West. Large business of the Russian Federation depends on Western banks and their loans. External corporate debt of the Russian Federation on 1 January 2013 amounted to 564 billion dollars. And it is growing fast. By 1 October 2013, it grew in nine months by 13% (by 83,2 billion dollars), making 719,6 billion dollars. No food security, Russia buys food for huge amounts. In 2010, Russia purchased food for 36,4 billion dollars. In general, in the sphere of economics and finance, the situation is unstable and dangerous. Conflict with the West will aggravate the situation.
Economic problems in Russia can trigger the activation of numerous "ulcers." So, in 2012-2013, there was a tendency to bring the interests of representatives of radical Islamists, migrants, nationalists and liberals closer together. In Russia, the threat of the emergence of "political Islam", supported by a part of the population of the North Caucasus, Tatarstan, as well as numerous Central Asian migrants, arose. Moscow, by its policy of encouraging migration from Central Asia, the Transcaucasus, internal migration from the North Caucasus, and the lack of resistance to ethnocratic clans, has created several “internal mines”. The West will try to force the development of a “Syrian scenario” in Russia. Russia may face opposition along the lines of “Russians - Caucasians”, “Russians - Migrants” and “Christians - Muslims”. Obviously, the criminal world, including ethnic criminal groups and the drug mafia, will not stand aside. And this is against the background of economic problems and instability at external borders.
Another “mine” for Russia is a threat from the Caucasian and Central Asian directions. So, serious analysts have long warned about a sharp deterioration in the situation in Central Asia. As in Ukraine, the decay of the Central Asian republics in the time that has passed since 1991, came to its peak. The US can dramatically destabilize the situation in Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan. External influence will be imposed on huge internal problems. In the South Caucasus, aggravation is also possible - there is a threat of revolutionary events, and a war for Nagorno-Karabakh. This will lead to a new wave of refugees. The growth of the zone of instability. Moscow will be forced to react in one way or another.
There are other areas in which the West can put pressure on Russia. The decision on a possible military response to events in Ukraine is only “A.” And saying “A”, you must say “B”. Moscow will have to conduct ideological and economic mobilization in the country. The armed forces must be prepared for special operations in a foreign and their territory. This requires the Special Operations Forces. In the economic sphere, take a course on autarky, get rid of financial and economic dependence, carry out a new industrialization. Restore food security.
To clean the information field of the country from the "fifth column". The most irreconcilable leaders of the “fifth column,” including liberals and Wahhabis, should find themselves in labor camps. The organizers of the business on the territory of the Russian Federation, leaders of ethnic organized criminal groups are subject to physical destruction. The most dangerous oligarchs must be indicatively condemned. Their property is nationalized. Stop the privatization, the government of Medvedev to resign, to begin an investigation of its activities. Revise the privatization results. Under the court must be given and active destroyers of the armed forces. Investigate the collapse of the USSR and the criminal reforms of 1990's.
The topic of migration is taken under tight control. To deport all illegal migrants. For those migrants who are necessary for the implementation of certain works, create labor camps, towns, where they are under complete control and outside of work are not in contact with the local population. After completion of work, watch, immediate return home. It must be remembered that the migration problem is a matter of the national security of Russia, the survival of the Russian civilization, and the super-ethnos of the Rus. We can not allow uncontrolled in Russia millions of migrants.
There are many problems in Russia, many of them are extremely advanced. Confrontation with the West will reveal them all. Therefore, it is not too late to solve the most serious of them. It must be understood that the first defeat in a battle is not yet a loss to the war. It is necessary to do ruthless work on the bugs, to restore order at home. The battle for Ukraine is only part of the party. Global confrontation covers the entire planet. And the cost of defeat is very high - the death of Russian civilization and the deletion of the super-ethnos of the Rus from history.
Information