Military Review

John Cornyn and K have found the weak point of Russia - banking assets in the USA

143
Economically advanced figures from the US Senate set out to arrange an artificial financial crisis in Russia. The harsh four "sanctioners" of 13 September appealed to the US Treasury with a call to block the access of some large Russian banks to the American financial system. We are talking about VTB, VEB and Gazprombank. Senators believe that these banks do business with the bloody Syrian regime, including receiving money for the C-300 air defense system. And at VTB, a chemical tyrant, the poisoner of his own people, Asad, generally keeps his savings for a rainy day.




“According to numerous reports, such banks as VTB, VEB and Gazprombank are, as usual, doing business with Syria, repeatedly undermining the sanctions imposed by the United States, the European Union and the United Nations. Such activities, it was reported, include assisting Vnesheconombank in making payments for C-300 rocket systems, storing President Asad’s personal assets in VTB, payments from Gazprombank for oil, lead senators "Days. Ru" with reference to the RIA "News».

A letter addressed to Jacob Lew was signed by Democratic Senators Richard Blumenthal, Gene Shaheen and Republicans John Cornyn and Kelly Ayotte.

These people believe that thanks to the assistance of Russian banks, the Syrian authorities are purchasing weapon and wage a civil war. In this regard, the letter says: "We believe that these institutions are involved in the ongoing brutal conflict in Syria and should be denied access to the American financial system."

The four have already developed a proposal: the US Treasury Department should freeze the assets of Russian banks in the United States, ban their activities on American territory and impose restrictions on foreign travel of employees.

In short, a mixture of financial sanctions with the "Magnitsky list."

Dni.ru also indicates that VTB has already denied senators ’claims about Bashar al-Assad’s personal accounts. The press service of the bank said: “The statements of four US senators are the dissemination of completely unreliable information. In the VTB group there are no accounts of the leadership of Syria. We regard the words of the senators as a provocative attempt to mislead the US public. ”

Reviewer Maxim Makarychev ("Russian newspaper") speaks of the senators' letter as an extremely tough "in tone". The correspondent also indicates that the Ministry of Finance of the United States did not comment on this appeal of the legislators.

Senator Blumenthal participated in a discussion on US policy toward Syria and Iran at the bipartisan policy center in Washington. His words are quoted by the Politico newspaper:

“The Syrians could not conduct this war without financing from Russia. We can freeze their assets. We can stop them from doing business in the United States, prevent their employees from entering the territory of (our country), which, in fact, can impose a very heavy financial burden on the Russians ... Nevertheless, much remains to be done. The administration (US) is putting pressure on the respective governments and companies to stop financial and other support for the Assad regime, and will continue to do so. ”


Andrey Polunin ("Free press") interviewed experts on the subject of sanctions against Russian banks. Politician and economist Yury Boldyrev said the following:

“If sanctions against Russian banks are imposed, this is a severe blow. Our entire financial system is not independent, and therefore vulnerable. At the same time, this is a very effective warning to the Russian authorities that they will not succeed in reaching an agreement with America: either you will crawl on your knees and beg forgiveness, or we will beat you in full.

Then how? Either you hand over the sovereignty of the country, and then you will bend down lower and lower, or you will desperately fight for independence - engineering, technological, defense. It is impossible to pretend at the same time that you are opposing the United States, and at the same time destroy the remnants of your own science. You can not simultaneously speak on the problem of Syria, as a measured, thoughtful force, which offers, without hurrying, to wait for the results of examinations, and at the same time push the destruction of the RAS at a leap. In fact, the question of the fate of our Academy of Sciences is no less complex and important than the Syrian one - why does the Kremlin behave differently in these situations ?! ”


The answer is simple, the expert believes. When the United States is hitting the Russian financial system, Moscow is unequivocally warned that in the framework of the dollar system, within the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, dependent on the dollar, Russia cannot gain sovereignty. If you gain sovereignty, explains the economist, so

“In full, including financial. The modern world does not offer any other option. Either crawling on my knees, or rising to my full height - there is no third option. ”


Moreover, the American strike will be the most severe, because VTB, VEB and Gazprombank, comrade Boldyrev notes, operate mainly with currency, and all dollar operations pass through settlement centers in the United States. VTB and VEB are “pieces of the state, albeit formally separated from it. To freeze their assets is almost the same thing as to freeze the assets of the Central Bank of Russia. ” As the next step, the expert says, Americans could arrest all the property of the Russian Federation in the United States. Between these two steps is not such a big distance, the analyst believes.

At the same time, Boldyrev does not think that the Americans will freeze Russian bank assets in the near future. However, the very senatorial warning -

“A very tough blackmail, designed for the fact that our government - portraying the appearance of independence - will, under pressure, hand over even more rapidly the strategic interests of the country”.


Nikita Krichevsky, a professor and chief researcher at the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, gave a “more moderate” opinion to the Free Press:

“Obama will not go to such sanctions. But if, hypothetically, this happens, VTB, VEB and Gazprombank will work with the States through other financial institutions, through correspondent accounts with other credit institutions. In my opinion, from an economic point of view, the measure proposed by the senators is completely empty. This is nothing more than demagoguery and shocking fists. "


However, Comrade Krichevsky also points out: American senators are thus beating on Russia, because two of the three banks are state banks. Therefore, the threat of sanctions is an additional tool of pressure on Russia on the Syrian issue.

Olga Gritsenko ("Sight") recalls that earlier in the media more than once wrote about the cooperation of Russian state banks with Damascus. For example, last year, the Financial Times reported: “While Western banks stopped their ties with Syria, Russian financial institutions - VTB, Vnesheconombank, and Gazprombank — work with it in the usual way.” And in May 2013 of the year in the Western press passed the information that Syria paid the cost of six C-300 complexes through VTB. Finally, quite recently, Reuters claimed that in recent months Damascus had transferred almost 1 billion to Moscow for four C-300 and 550 million for Moscow for 36 Yak-130 combat aircraft.

The head of the Center for Analysis of the World Arms Trade, Igor Korotchenko, told the newspaper Vzglyad:

“Domestic American legislation does not apply to the Russian Federation. Our supplies to Syria are absolutely legal and legitimate from the point of view of the norms of international law, since no sanctions were imposed at the level of the UN Security Council and there is no prohibition on military-technical cooperation with Syria. And the fact that the Americans impose some kind of sanctions does not mean that Russia should follow them. ”


According to Korotchenko, the American initiative is another “recurrence of the thinking of the times of the Cold War”. According to him, the introduction of sanctions against Russia can be regarded as arbitrariness: “This will be an unfriendly decision, and we, in turn, will have the right to retaliate, for example, to prohibit senators from entering Russia. We must respond to such tricks. In addition, the listed banks are respected in the international community, and international banks and financiers will negatively react to the initiative of US senators. ”

It is strange, of course, to believe, let us add on our own that the American senators are rushing to Russia or are frightened by such a terrible measure as the ban on visiting Moscow. On the other hand, it is too early to speak of retaliatory measures: it is unlikely that the petition, signed by just four senators, would later become valid.

Nevertheless, this document should be attached to the thick bundle of American papers that has accumulated on the so-called Syrian issue and which serves a single case, jointly promoted by the monarchies of the Persian Gulf, official Washington and the military-industrial complex circles behind congressmen: remove from power in Damascus, Assad and put there on the throne of some petty vassal from the "opposition", loyal to the White House and the Saudis from Qatar to the last pimple.

The petition of senators signals not only Russia and Syria, but the entire world community: Washington will never back down on the idea of ​​overthrowing Assad.

Meanwhile, official Damascus agrees to destroy its own chemical weapons. Already calculated the time and cost of such an operation.

The transfer of chemical weapons in Syria under international control will cost about 1 billion dollars and take about a year. This was said by Bashar Asad in an interview with Fox News, reports "Sight".

Syrian President explained: "This is a very difficult operation, it requires a lot of money, about 1 billion (dollars), and about a year - maybe less, maybe more." He added: "We are ready to transfer (chemical weapons) to any country that is ready to receive it."

Appeared in the press and the information that help Damascus in the export and destruction of chemical weapons will, in addition to UN experts, the military from several countries, including Russia.

How to write Elena Chernenko and Ivan Safronov (Kommersant), referring to an unnamed source in the General Staff of the Russian Federation, consultations are underway in the defense ministry “on the quantitative composition of the contingent”, which may be sent to Syria. The group is likely to include specialists from the radiation, chemical and biological defense forces of the RF Armed Forces. It is possible that a special forces brigade will be sent to the site of the operation.

It is not known how many servicemen Russia will send to Syria. “Different options are being considered. The exact number and composition of the contingent will depend on how many soldiers our foreign partners will provide for this mission, ”an anonymous source told Kommersant. He added that the total number of participants from all countries can be up to 10 thousand people.

Thus, while Russia and Syria implement their commitments to destroy chemical weapons, contributing to further peace negotiations there, some US senators seek to restore peace during the Cold War and show that America is in favor of democracy and disarmament, and Russia supports the bloodthirsty Syrian tyrant-poisoner, supplying him with weapons from under the floors.

In conclusion, the material is a few lines about Senator John Kornin, one of the signatories of the petition against Russian banks.

This man has consistently harmed Russia. At the end of last year, he acted as the author of an initiative to amend the US defense budget, which prohibits the Pentagon from making deals with Rosoboronexport. Cornyn said that Washington should abandon purchases from Russia: after all, it supports the Syrian authorities.

In 2012, Kornin did not succeed, although the Senate supported the amendment. The Senators were objected to the Pentagon, who considered that the choice of the Mi-17 was the best for the AF of Afghanistan.

However, John did not leave attempts. Not by hook or by crook ...

As reported by 18 on September 2013. correspondent ITAR-TASS Dmitry Kirsanov, a group of members of the US Congress in writing asked the US Attorney General, Attorney General Eric Holder to connect to the investigation of the circumstances of the Pentagon's purchase of Mi-17 helicopters for Afghanistan. The text of the letter, dated 16 September, was made public by John Cornin.

Legislators ask Mr. Holder to study information about possible abuse of power by the former and current management in charge of the non-standard helicopter program aviation US Army, which also includes the Mi-17 for the Afghan Armed Forces. Lawmakers insist that Holder "use all available resources, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation." Congressmen crave a “criminal investigation into the matter.” The petition was signed by 9 senators, including Kornin, and 23 members of the House of Representatives. The US Department of Justice has already confirmed that they are studying the letter.

Well, let us add from ourselves, there is every reason to assert that John Cornyn and K will not leave their anti-Russian and anti-Syrian inclinations ...

Observed and commented on Oleg Chuvakin
- especially for topwar.ru
143 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. The comment was deleted.
  2. GreatRussia
    GreatRussia 20 September 2013 08: 28 New
    +8
    “Obama will not go for such sanctions.

    Of course it won’t work.
    It is enough to shut off the tap at the pipeline to Europe, especially to NATO member countries. And it’s not the month of May in the yard, but in the USA and the geyrope da Aleko it’s not the best economic situation.

    But here's what began to take by the balls threats began to come, this is the very reason to stir not only the aforementioned banks, but not only in Russia.
    1. Mart
      20 September 2013 08: 34 New
      40
      Quote: GreatRussia
      It is enough to close the tap at the pipeline to Europe. And the yard is not the month of May.


      You will not find understanding in the Ministry of Finance and the raw oligarchs. According to Comrade. Lenin, politics is the most concentrated expression of economics. And the overlap of the tap is a way not only to the budget deficit, but also to large penalties. And in general, the Europeans - they seem to be not Americans ...

      Qatar, by the way, is just waiting for Russia to blunder with gas supplies. Another reason will be rapidly "democratizing" Syria.
      1. GreatRussia
        GreatRussia 20 September 2013 09: 35 New
        0
        Quote: Mart
        but also to major penalties.


        Read carefully again:

        “If sanctions against Russian banks are imposed, this is a severe blow. Our entire financial system is not independent, and therefore vulnerable. At the same time, this is a very effective warning to the Russian authorities that they will not succeed in reaching an agreement with America: either you will crawl on your knees and beg forgiveness, or we will beat you in full.
        1. Mart
          20 September 2013 09: 42 New
          12
          Quote: GreatRussia
          Quote: Mart
          but also to major penalties.


          Read carefully again:

          “If sanctions against Russian banks are imposed, this is a severe blow. Our entire financial system is not independent, and therefore vulnerable. At the same time, this is a very effective warning to the Russian authorities that they will not succeed in reaching an agreement with America: either you will crawl on your knees and beg forgiveness, or we will beat you in full.


          And where is Europe? smile Do you really believe that it is possible to blackmail the United States by turning off gas to EU countries and that the EU will not be responsible for non-delivery of fines? Either you really believe, or I don’t understand you at all.
          1. GreatRussia
            GreatRussia 20 September 2013 09: 49 New
            +2
            Quote: Mart
            And where is Europe? smile Do you really believe that you can blackmail the United States by cutting off gas to EU countries and that the EU will not be responsible for non-delivery of fines? Either really believe me, or I don’t understand you at all.


            In Europe and the United States almost simultaneously announced a global economic project. In record time - until the end of 2014 - it should be implemented as a transatlantic free trade area (TAFTA - Transatlantic Free Trade Area). The rush with which its potential participants embarked on this grandiose project is evidenced by the fact that already in March, representatives of the European Union are ready to convey their position to the US side in negotiations that will begin no later than the end of June.

            At a time when the EU economy is in a state of stagnation, and US manufacturers are looking for new sales marketsOne should only wonder why such an idea has not been implemented before. Today, she is supported by representatives of the largest and most influential business and industrial lobby groups on both sides of the Atlantic.

            http://gazeta.zn.ua/international/evropa-i-ssha-sozdadut-ekonomicheskoe-nato-_.h
            tml


            And now think. The overlap of the crane in response to an economic and financial attack on the Russian Federation (otherwise quoted from the article can not be called) will definitely have a deplorable effect on the largest market for US goods.
            Do you think this will affect the already shaky economy of the star-striped creature?
            1. Mart
              20 September 2013 09: 57 New
              15
              Quote: GreatRussia
              And now think. The overlap of the crane in response to an economic and financial attack on the Russian Federation (otherwise quoted from the article can not be called) will definitely have a deplorable effect on the largest market for US goods.
              Do you think this will affect the already shaky economy of the star-striped creature?


              Dear friend! What is the overlap?

              Gazprom exports gas to the countries of Central and Western Europe mainly under long-term contracts of up to 25 years, concluded, as a rule, on the basis of intergovernmental agreements.

              Long-term contracts with petroleum products and the take-or-pay condition are the basis for the stability and reliability of gas supplies. Only such contracts can provide the manufacturer and the exporter with a guarantee of return on the multi-billion investments required for the implementation of major gas export projects, and the importer with a guarantee of reliable and uninterrupted gas supply over a long period of time.

              Today, the portfolio of signed long-term contracts of Gazprom provides at the level of minimum obligations the sale of 4 trillion cubic meters. meters of gas to non-CIS countries for the period until the expiration of the contracts.

              Among the main features of long-term contracts are the following:

              price formula that takes into account changes in prices for petroleum products for the previous 6 – 9 months;
              conditions that prevent the unilateral termination of contracts, except in cases of prolonged force majeure;
              “take or pay” terms that apply to a significant contractual volume, which stipulate that the buyer pays volumes that are not selected for the year and may subsequently be withdrawn with an appropriate surcharge upon delivery of the minimum annual volumes stipulated by the contracts in the relevant year. ”

              A source: "Gazprom", section "Europe".

              Read: "... in the framework of long-term contracts for up to 25 years, concluded, as a rule, on the basis of intergovernmental agreements"; "... conditions that prevent the unilateral termination of contracts, except in cases of prolonged force majeure."

              What kind of attitude towards Russia will be in Europe after such a political overlap of the tap, do you think?
              1. GreatRussia
                GreatRussia 20 September 2013 10: 02 New
                +3
                Quote: Mart
                Read: "... in the framework of long-term contracts for up to 25 years, concluded, as a rule, on the basis of intergovernmental agreements"; "... conditions that prevent the unilateral termination of contracts, except in cases of prolonged force majeure."

                What kind of attitude towards Russia will be in Europe after such a political overlap of the tap, do you think?


                Oh, mdy ..
                You again did not understand that if the United States attacked the Russian Federation, in particular:

                To freeze their assets is almost the same as freezing the assets of the Central Bank of Russia. ” As the next step, the expert says, the Americans could have seized all the property of the Russian Federation in the United States.


                “If sanctions against Russian banks are imposed, this is a severe blow. Our entire financial system is not independent, and therefore vulnerable. At the same time, this is a very effective warning to the Russian authorities that they will not succeed in reaching an agreement with America: either you will crawl on your knees and beg forgiveness, or we will beat you in full.


                , then the Russian Federation has one way out, either to kneel or to retaliate economically, because it’s simply not enough to lose the Russian Federation.
                This is WAR, dear comrade.
                1. astra
                  astra 20 September 2013 10: 41 New
                  +6
                  Has the history of Cyprus not taught the Russian oligarchs to refuse to keep money over the hill? Now the looming prospect of losing money even on a large scale in America. I don’t think that the United States will decide to take such a step, otherwise Russia may take counter-American counter-steps: for example, oblige America to exchange dollars for gold, in case of refusal and this will announce to the whole world that the USA does not fulfill its earlier obligations to exchange dollars for gold and The dollar is not a world currency since it is not supported by gold. Even if our demand for protest is ignored by America, it will still seriously shake the dollar. It will be necessary to exchange stocks of dollars for gold and currencies of other countries as soon as possible. Refuse to make payments for oil and other goods for dollars. Well, put the S-300 to Iran, Syria and many countries with which the United States is not friends. There are many reciprocal levers of pressure; amers understand this, so I won’t aggravate it. So scare.
                  1. skeptic
                    skeptic 20 September 2013 13: 53 New
                    +7
                    Quote: astra
                    Has the history of Cyprus not taught the Russian oligarchs to refuse to keep money over the hill? Now the looming prospect of losing money even on a large scale in America.


                    Taught. The population and image of Russia will be brought to their knees. Well, not by ourselves ...
                  2. No_more
                    No_more 20 September 2013 17: 00 New
                    +2
                    Those who love to work taught, but those who do not want to - no. Withdraw money to the "West" - usually for the lazy, leave here or send to the "East" - for the savvy and those who want to earn more.
                2. Natalia
                  Natalia 20 September 2013 11: 21 New
                  0
                  Quote: Mart
                  What kind of attitude towards Russia will be in Europe after such a political overlap of the tap, do you think?

                  Quote: GreatRussia
                  RF simply will not be horseradish.
                  This is WAR, dear comrade.

                  heated discussion ... like in that song ...
                  And the two did not agree on fear, but on conscience,
                  The wheels drove away a dream:
                  One said: Our life is a train,
                  Another said: Perron.
              2. alone
                alone 20 September 2013 13: 47 New
                +4
                blocking a gas pipe can be sued in an international court. What decision the court will make even now is known. Then you will have to not only open the pipelines anew, but also pay heavy fines. It’s not so simple.
            2. 31231
              31231 20 September 2013 11: 26 New
              +3
              You carry nonsense. What does Europe and gas have to do with it ?!
            3. skeptic
              skeptic 20 September 2013 13: 47 New
              +2
              Quote: GreatRussia

              And now think. The overlap of the crane in response to an economic and financial attack on the Russian Federation (otherwise quoted from the article can not be called) will definitely have a deplorable effect on the largest market for US goods.
              Do you think this will affect the already shaky economy of the star-striped creature?




              According to Korotchenko, the American initiative is another "relapse of thinking during the Cold War." According to him, the imposition of sanctions against Russia can be regarded as arbitrary: “This will be an unfriendly decision, and we, in turn, will have the right to take retaliatory measures, for example

              For example, to begin procedures for transferring international financial transactions for the sale of raw materials to ruble (i.e., abandoning the dollar in the economy). Hard, hard BUT ...
          2. Ascetic
            Ascetic 20 September 2013 11: 13 New
            15
            Quote: Mart
            Do you really believe that it is possible to blackmail the United States by turning off gas to EU countries and that the EU will not be responsible for non-delivery of fines? Either you really believe, or I don’t understand you at all.


            Oleg! Review good thanks! I noticed only one detail. They propose to "impose" precisely the activity Putin's banks- VEB, VTB and Gazprombank - for some reason, there’s no question of the other “Russian” banks ... The next pressure and blackmail are precisely on Putin, who dared to implement the idea of ​​creating the BRICS Development Bank, that is, these five countries (Brazil, India, China, Russia and South Africa, if I am not mistaken) created a fund and financial structure of a bank with a total capital of about $ 150 billion (I can be wrong in the figures). the purpose of which is to maintain the stability of the national currencies of the BRICS member countries. That is, it is claimed that five countries have set up their own monetary fund, an alternative to the IMF.
            Maybe this is the root of this blackmail? In general, there is very little information in the media about this. I would like to see a review on this topic. Moreover, the Fed didn’t stop the press despite all the statements and the dollar went down, while the periphery countries began to put more pressure on the “golden billion” countries in the IMF demanding a revision of quotas, and according to this, the West can easily close the IMF shop and create some new international fund in the image of the IMF. Our friends, the gay men, by the way, after the financial crisis created something similar called European Financial Stabilization Fund (EFSF) , now here the BRICS countries have fussed ... So American threats are not so terrible as it seems ..
            1. Mart
              20 September 2013 12: 09 New
              +2
              Quote: Ascetic
              Oleg! Good review thanks! I noticed only one detail. They are suggesting that the activity of Putin's banks, VEB, VTB and Gazprombank, be put on the rest of the Russian banks for some reason ... Another pressure and blackmail on Putin, who dared to carry out the idea of ​​creating the BRICS Development Bank , that is, these five countries (Brazil, India, China, Russia and South Africa, if not mistaken) created a fund and financial structure of a bank with a total capital of about $ 150 billion (I could be wrong in numbers). the goal of which is to maintain the stability of the national currencies of the member countries of the BRICS. That is, it is argued that five countries have created their own monetary fund, an alternative to the IMF.
              Maybe this is the root of this blackmail? In general, there is very little information in the media about this. I would like to see a review on this topic.


              Good day, Stanislav! If something interesting appears in the foreign press, I will try to do a review. hi
      2. Ivan Tarasov
        Ivan Tarasov 20 September 2013 10: 57 New
        +9
        Nothing should be blocked.
        It is enough to announce the sale of our resources exclusively for rubles.
        1. bif
          bif 20 September 2013 11: 47 New
          +5
          My thoughts are straightforward, to sell for the national currency (rubles) or even better for GOLD (as the states took with us for a lease-lease), and to buy for "green candy wrappers with dead presidents" that will soon depreciate ... It even sounds funny, that a bankrupt country with a debt that is simply not realistic to repay and the lack of gold in the vaults will impose sanctions ... it’s enough to sell all the dollars from the Gold and Currency Reserve of the Russian Federation (to buy another currency or gold) and everything will come ... and if If China joins us (the main creditor of the USA), then the US economy will float like a Titanic ... it’s time for the Ators to think not about sanctions, but about what territories of the USA they will repay for debts ... soon)))
        2. Locksmith
          Locksmith 20 September 2013 12: 13 New
          +3
          Quote: Ivan Tarasov
          Nothing should be blocked.
          It is enough to announce the sale of our resources exclusively for rubles.

          Ett for sure, and rubles only for gold wink
        3. OPATOP
          OPATOP 20 September 2013 12: 59 New
          +5
          Quote: Ivan Tarasov
          It is enough to announce the sale of our resources exclusively for rubles.

          I agree with you. Only with a slight amendment. Not about the sale of resources should be discussed. And about the rejection of the dollar as a currency, and publicly declaring it a candy wrapper worthless. This will be a real blow to the United States.
          1. stroporez
            stroporez 22 September 2013 12: 16 New
            0
            Quote: OPATOP
            And about the rejection of the dollar as a currency, and publicly declaring it a candy wrapper worthless.
            -------- then the "hot" phase of the war will begin ....... amers are not our "leaders" -------- I think they won’t chew on snot for a long time.
    2. domokl
      domokl 20 September 2013 08: 42 New
      14
      Quote: GreatRussia
      It is enough to shut off the tap at the pipeline to Europe

      Nonsense. The pipeline and other sanctions will only lead to a new world crisis. And there .. everything is possible.
      It’s another matter that Americans risk their investments very much. Such actions will lead to a natural outflow of deposits of other countries from the USA. China in the first place. Yes and smaller investors will leave. And there the death of a world currency called the buck is just around the corner. And therefore, world hygemony is covered by a copper basin.
      Americans are not stupid and will not want to joke with such things.
      1. Natalia
        Natalia 20 September 2013 09: 36 New
        +1
        Quote: domokl
        Americans are not stupid and will not want to joke with such things.

        And besides, the dollar is not provided with anything, and we have gold for every ruble ... and then, in other countries in the same China the same situation.
        If we say everyone starts to withdraw their money and transfer from the dollar to something, then naturally candy wrappers will become candy wrappers ...
        The dollar today rests on fear, on wars, on the tarnished reputation of the United States as a world power ... it will surely collapse someday, too unreliably.
        1. ben gun
          ben gun 20 September 2013 09: 39 New
          17
          Unfortunately, we have only a dollar for each ruble. Everything else is first converted to Baku, and then it is already exchanged into rubles - for which thanks to Chubais, Gaidars, Yeltsin, Gorbachev and so on.
        2. Ascetic
          Ascetic 20 September 2013 11: 46 New
          +7
          Quote: Natalia
          and we have gold for every ruble


          Alas, it would be nice to be so, but the ruble unfortunately is closely tied to the dollar.
          1. Cpa
            Cpa 20 September 2013 19: 56 New
            0
            Quote: Ascetic
            Alas, it would be nice to be so, but the ruble unfortunately is closely tied to the dollar.

            In my opinion, the ruble is closely tied to the Swiss franc.
          2. ksan
            ksan 21 September 2013 20: 18 New
            0
            Ascetic SU Yesterday, 11:46 ↑

            Quote: Natalia
            and we have gold for every ruble


            Alas, it would be nice to be so, but the ruble unfortunately is closely tied to the dollar.
            But everything is going all the same to the Gold Standard, or in any case to a few reserve currencies. In recent years, both Russia and China have been replenishing gold reserves intensively. Russia (the Central Bank) purchases more than 100 tons of gold every year, there are no data on China (for purchases) but it produces more than 300 tons per year.
    3. ziqzaq
      ziqzaq 20 September 2013 08: 47 New
      +8
      Quote: GreatRussia
      “Obama will not go for such sanctions.

      On the other hand, maybe they can freeze everything that is possible, they are scumbags ...
      Maybe at least it makes the authorities go to full financial independence ...
      1. LaGlobal
        LaGlobal 20 September 2013 09: 38 New
        +1
        Forgive me for swearing, but these Fuck *** YOU Americans, nnuuu very good! It seems that they have no brains at all!
        (c) M.Zadornov: well, stupid people, well, stupid people ....
      2. nov_tech.vrn
        nov_tech.vrn 20 September 2013 09: 57 New
        +5
        Now in the financial and economic bloc of the government and financial institutions, the vast majority of the club of “Gaidar’s friends” in order to do something seriously (not under a blanket slowly), we must rewrite the law on the central bank, and then all by-laws and related laws, this pack will try to prevent it at the helm, now they are getting in every way underfoot and doing sabotage, uselessly cleaning out one Gref or say Ulyukaev, structural changes must be made, although of course the shooting of one scoundrel sobering a hundred of his kind.
    4. Sadikoff
      Sadikoff 20 September 2013 09: 40 New
      +1
      It’s not necessary, just to sell everything for Russian rubles.
    5. Max otto
      Max otto 20 September 2013 09: 44 New
      15
      It is necessary to withdraw assets from the United States. It’s like in banks, if a bank blundered and depositors massively start taking money, then consider such a bank to come. Following Russia, several more countries will begin to withdraw, and so on, by increasing to default.
      1. Garrin
        Garrin 20 September 2013 10: 09 New
        +3
        Quote: Max Otto
        It is necessary to withdraw assets from the United States.

        I completely agree. You got ahead of me.
      2. ksan
        ksan 21 September 2013 20: 24 New
        0
        Max Otto SU Yesterday, 09:44 ↑

        It is necessary to withdraw assets from the United States. It’s like in banks, if a bank blundered and depositors massively start taking money, then consider such a bank to come. Following Russia, several more countries will begin to withdraw, and so on, by increasing to default.
        You need not to “break” the branch on which you are sitting, but carefully (so as not to fall it hurts smile ) get off him.
    6. user
      user 20 September 2013 10: 05 New
      +4
      GreatRussia SU Today, 08:28 AM

      “Obama will not go for such sanctions.

      Of course it won’t work.

      About Cyprus, too, they said so, and everyone saw how it ended.
      In general, until we get away from dollar dependence, nothing good can come to an end for us. And for this it is necessary to amend the Constitution on the Central Bank of the Russian Federation.
      According to the Constitution, the Central Bank of the Russian Federation does not depend on either the president or the State Duma; someone knows a funnier joke. . . .
      A special place is occupied by the constitutional powers of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, enshrined in Article 75 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation.
    7. Flooding
      Flooding 20 September 2013 10: 05 New
      +4
      Quote: GreatRussia
      Of course it won’t work.

      I’d better go. Let them block the green frantic until it stops.
      Maybe then our financial geniuses will stir and stop curling our brains with purchases of dollars and US government bonds.
    8. Russ69
      Russ69 20 September 2013 10: 45 New
      +6
      Quote: GreatRussia
      Of course it won’t work.

      It will, it will not, it does not matter. But there was a good reason to withdraw assets from Western banks, especially from the USA ...
    9. uhu189
      uhu189 20 September 2013 11: 11 New
      +5
      It will be enough just to stop processing uranium for American nuclear power plants at our plants - and after a while, most of the American nuclear power plants will stop, because the USA has no processing facilities ... And then they really let them prove that they have a shale revolution . Only one minus - it will also hit us seriously, but not so hard.
    10. Airman
      Airman 20 September 2013 11: 48 New
      +1
      [quote = GreatRussia] [quote] "Obama will not go for such sanctions. [/ quote]
      Hope for God, but don’t be bad yourself! Therefore, there is little hope for Obama, he does not decide anything on his own, he is a puppet in the hands of financial tycoons, therefore, if it will be profitable for them, then ......
    11. w.ebdo.g
      w.ebdo.g 20 September 2013 13: 33 New
      +1
      talk about the sovereignty of Russia.
      The most interesting are the first 45 minutes ...
      It explains why the President asks the government to make the necessary decisions, and the government, on the contrary, makes decisions that are beneficial for our enemies in the United States.
    12. artemiy
      artemiy 20 September 2013 13: 37 New
      +1
      We can also be in a place with China! Go to rubles and yuan! AND KIRDYK AMERICA! They’ll hurt themselves more by blocking our cash flows! It's just a rotten burp of makeup!
  3. Vladimirets
    Vladimirets 20 September 2013 08: 30 New
    +8
    "The petition of the senators signals not only Russia and Syria, but the whole world community: Washington will never back down from the idea of ​​overthrowing Assad."

    "Carthage must be destroyed." As the whole history of mankind shows, concessions to the aggressor have never led to peace, whatever they may be. As a result, the victim was still attacked and captured. Only rigidity, only struggle and a demonstration of determination, flirting with a hyena like death.
  4. a52333
    a52333 20 September 2013 08: 36 New
    +9
    By the way, this is bad (the next run-up to the external assets of the Russian Federation) - it has its own good: GDP promotes the policy of asset recovery from offshore. And big business should think:
    1) Cyprus
    2) Remember two weeks ago, the recession on the assets of the "son" of the Minister of Transport of MO
    3) Today's situevina.

    Let big business THINK STRONGLY.
    1. Airman
      Airman 20 September 2013 09: 27 New
      +3
      Quote: a52333

      Let big business THINK STRONGLY.

      And what should he think, he is all (big business) oriented to the west, they all, when the freebie ends to rob people, will be dumped there. Abramovich has not lived in Russia for a long time, he comes here on short visits. Moreover, all foreign exchange reserves are in the banks of the Americans.
      1. a52333
        a52333 20 September 2013 10: 12 New
        +4
        Quote: Povshnik
        Abramovich has not lived in Russia for a long time; he comes here on short visits
        Abramovich let him remember the fate of Berezovsky. West, recently, like a mad dog - it is not clear who will bite the next.
    2. avt
      avt 20 September 2013 09: 50 New
      +5
      Quote: a52333
      By the way, this is bad (the next run-up to the external assets of the Russian Federation) - it has its own good: GDP promotes the policy of asset recovery from offshore. And big business should think:

      Well, the GDP told them at one time about their money in the West, that it’s something - you’re tormented by swallowing dust " laughing Well done Americans! In the idiotic, children's fervor, they very clearly explained who was the boss in the American house. laughing And that’s all ,, the inviolability of private property ",,, the triumph of law and law" ,,, human rights " laughing
  5. mogus
    mogus 20 September 2013 08: 38 New
    +9
    The harsh four “sanctioners” on September 13 called on the US Treasury Department to block the access of some large Russian banks to the US financial system.
    Block please! You will rob profits - the holiest thing to bankers. Maybe then they will stir and quickly untie the ruble from the dollar ..?
  6. vladsolo56
    vladsolo56 20 September 2013 08: 39 New
    +9
    That’s Russia's independent policy, laughter and that’s all, and that’s just a petty cause for disagreement, and if something serious happens, America will collapse our economy in a matter of days. All normal economists and politicians in Russia have already spoken about this many times, and whoever listens to them, Uncle Sam still commands our government.
    1. vladsolo56
      vladsolo56 20 September 2013 09: 02 New
      +5
      I am struck by the obstinacy of some, not knowing the topic, and not even trying to delve into it, based only on slogans and declarations, they stubbornly do not want to see reality, moreover, at all levels they are ready to defend their mistakes. This is me to the fact that the first cons went from those who have unlimited faith, beloved, respected, dear, etc.
      1. ksandr45
        ksandr45 20 September 2013 09: 34 New
        +7
        In the pros and cons to you was not noticed. My question is, if America can so easily bring down our economic system, why doesn’t it? Maybe their bankers are not making bad profits on us? And what, for example, should there be disagreements so that the amers decide to freeze the assets of our banks?
      2. Natalia
        Natalia 20 September 2013 09: 55 New
        +4
        Quote: vladsolo56
        This is me to the fact that the first cons went from those who have unlimited faith, beloved, respected, dear, etc.

        I must say that I am you not minus.....However...
        It seems that you are one of those people who believe that: 1) Putin is an American spy, 2) Everything is hopeless 3) We will all die 4) But we used to live well.
        Well, that's about all your arguments ... here you condemn the people who are here as you say
        Quote: vladsolo56
        the obstinacy of some, not knowing the topic, and not even trying to delve into it, based only on slogans and declarations,

        ... yes, exactly, isn’t it better to pronounce slogans than how to dissolve some nozzles ....
        1. vladsolo56
          vladsolo56 20 September 2013 12: 17 New
          +2
          I can answer you and advise you to read again what I wrote, where you saw the panic and specifically where it is written that these statements will bring down the Russian economy. Do you have fog in your eyes? I wrote that if America wants, in the event of a serious conflict, it will bring down the Russian economy. So before you draw conclusions, learn to carefully read and comprehend what you read. And you can not dismiss the snot about it and do not ask. Slogans, yes, please, as much as you like, can you eat slogans?
          1. Natalia
            Natalia 20 September 2013 12: 32 New
            +1
            Quote: vladsolo56
            I wrote that if America wants to,

            Well, again, the argument is vague, if yes, if only ...
            so argue ....
            Now, if Russia wants to, then America will stop wanting one day ... for we possess nuclear weapons of our own will.
            I personally do not aim to ridicule you somehow, just argue, suggest some options ... otherwise you write everything badly, badly, very badly ... yes, you can’t, you don’t know ...

            Just based on your posts, life is hopeless, we cover ourselves with a sheet and slowly crawl into the cemetery, slowly so as not to create a panic.
            With all due respect.
            1. vladsolo56
              vladsolo56 20 September 2013 12: 55 New
              0
              You know better to see more bad and understand that it’s bad, at least you’ll think about how to do it better than to rejoice that everything is good now and what will happen tomorrow, I worked for many years as an accountant from ordinary to main, and a little versed in economics. And besides, everything that I read and listen to from people who are more informed than I shape my worldview. I am a supporter of not only Boldyrev, but also Gubanova S.S., Musina M.M. Delyagina MG .. Again for you the listed people are not authorities. You want to see everything through pink glasses, only when suddenly these glasses burst, then what you see you will not like. But it is quite possible you already have a house in the "village" somewhere beyond the hill
              1. Natalia
                Natalia 20 September 2013 13: 44 New
                +1
                Quote: vladsolo56
                But it is quite possible you already have a house in the "village" somewhere beyond the hill


                You have all the people traitors, everyone wants to blame, throw, cheat ... then you are just a person who is more profitable to see more bad. You have the logic of an ever-suffering, rejected, unrecognized genius ... if those around you do not share your conviction, then they are traitors and they have a house in the "village" beyond the hill.
                I feel sorry for you ....
                1. vladsolo56
                  vladsolo56 20 September 2013 14: 28 New
                  0
                  And you do not spare me
                  Quote: Natalia
                  Quote: vladsolo56
                  But it is quite possible you already have a house in the "village" somewhere beyond the hill


                  You have all the people traitors, everyone wants to blame, throw, cheat ... then you are just a person who is more profitable to see more bad. You have the logic of an ever-suffering, rejected, unrecognized genius ... if those around you do not share your conviction, then they are traitors and they have a house in the "village" beyond the hill.
                  I feel sorry for you ....

                  But you all know everything about everyone and understand everything, it’s simply amazing and why are you not in the Kremlin yet. Do not identify with all people, this is not modest.
                  1. Natalia
                    Natalia 20 September 2013 15: 03 New
                    +1
                    Quote: vladsolo56
                    , it is not modest

                    Dear, you must be modest in a public toilet in order to quietly enter and even more quietly exit.
                    1. vladsolo56
                      vladsolo56 20 September 2013 16: 15 New
                      0
                      You probably have a lot of experience in this, I’ll take into account the future, at least learn something from you
      3. Refund_SSSR
        Refund_SSSR 20 September 2013 10: 50 New
        +3
        I put a minus.
        First of all, for responding to the pros and cons laughing and not just react, but on the basis of minuses accuse people of illiteracy!

        Now to the point.
        First:

        There are a lot of American assets as well as American property (including large companies, including the personal business of congressmen) in Russia.
        It is enough to nationalize subsidiaries and hydrocarbon deposits purchased by the United States and all losses from freezing bank accounts will be compensated for in excess. (what are the signed PSAs for the Vityaz brand of Sakhalin oil, one of the most valuable in the world).

        Second:
        We have already gone through the freezing of accounts in Cyprus, and as you can see, the crisis did not come (unfortunately the West), but a crisis of confidence and serious talk about creating a BRIS bank.
        Do you think that such a move on the part of the United States (those in debt ...) will be positively perceived by their creditors? Or will the world community once again look for a way to shove the dirty unreliable wrappers of a dying hegemon? and how will all this affect the US economy in the future ???

        Well and thirdly: To blindly rely on the words of Bolyrev is just ridiculous, who is Boldyrev ???
        For example, a professor, chief researcher at the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences Nikita Krichevsky believes that this measure of the United States is absolutely empty (is it probably stupid and not competent in your opinion?)

        So MINUS TO YOU! laughing It’s too early to yell that everything is gone, we’ll finish the look.
        1. vladsolo56
          vladsolo56 20 September 2013 19: 10 New
          0
          You learned how to write, and you seem to know how to read, but for some reason you don’t understand the meaning of what was written, you can re-read my comment again before writing what you wrote.
      4. ksan
        ksan 21 September 2013 20: 36 New
        0
        vladsolo56 RU Yesterday, 09:02 ↑

        I am struck by the obstinacy of some, not knowing the topic, and not even trying to delve into it, based only on slogans and declarations, they stubbornly do not want to see reality, moreover, at all levels they are ready to defend their mistakes. This is me to the fact that the first cons went from those who have unlimited faith, beloved, respected, dear, etc.
        For example, I do not minus if I simply do not agree. And you would also instead of unfounded statements like"That’s Russia's independent policy, laughter and that’s all, and that’s just a minor point of disagreement, and if something serious happens, America will collapse our economy in a matter of days." would have taken and deployed where, how, and why Uncle Sam still commands our government. I am sure you would be immediately instructed ++++ if they are so important to you hi
    2. Denis_Rossiya
      Denis_Rossiya 20 September 2013 09: 57 New
      +5
      To say that these measures will bring down the economy ... is too loudly said. Problems will be enough, but not bring down. And besides, few people pay attention to the fact that this is not profitable for the owners. Russia is the creditor of Pindland ... and China is the largest creditor. And having forgiven debts to Russia ... they will bear reputation risks. States will begin to get rid of such debts. And as mentioned above .... even removing the ability to use the dollar for international transactions, there will always be those who will be ready to help for a small percentage.
    3. Russ69
      Russ69 20 September 2013 10: 56 New
      +1
      Quote: vladsolo56
      That’s Russia's independent policy, laughter and that’s all, and that’s just a petty cause for disagreement, and if something serious happens, America will collapse our economy in a matter of days.

      It’s easy in the early 90s, but not now. The Russian economy is very much intertwined with the European economy. A strong economic downturn will dramatically affect the production in Europe and the United States. (Do you remember how all of America’s largest producers turned up against Bush, who had hinted at sanctions against Russia in 2008.)
      Russia is now the world's 6th economy, and its collapse will hit everyone.
    4. Eugeniy_369
      Eugeniy_369 20 September 2013 14: 52 New
      +3
      Quote: vladsolo56
      All normal economists and politicians in Russia have already spoken about this many times, and whoever listens to them, Uncle Sam still commands our government.

      +100500 An article in principle that the United States hinted that they would crush a case financially, but where the "patriots" immediately screamed- "Do not scare, besides, you hang blacks!" And the discussion started that it was all a bluff. I remember when the mattresses fell off the price of oil kirdyk did not come to them, but the economy of the USSR.
      I don’t understand how you can be independent of someone while holding money (both yours and state's) in his pocket? The volume of our reserves is not so large as to scare amers by withdrawing these reserves to the yuan, for example.
      Moreover, in addition to finance, the so-called "elite" holds there (abroad) its most sacred - children. It seems that the daughter himself is not in the country where he is for the president. But tell me, if God forbid, the time “Ch” comes, presses a button? Or an agreement with amers - Europe cannot be bombed ?!
      Quote: vladsolo56
      cons from those who unlimitedly believe, beloved, respected, dear, etc.

      Moreover, judging by the latest news and after 18, we will believe recourse .
      PS And Vasilyeva’s house arrest was extended in a 13-room “hut” until November 23 ..... Let the infection be bored with boredom even if the power is impotent ...
      1. ksan
        ksan 21 September 2013 20: 57 New
        0
        Eugeniy_369 RU Yesterday, 14:52 p.m. ↑ I remember when the mattresses fell off the price of oil, kirdyk did not come to them, but to the economy of the USSR.
        The economy of the USSR was stronger than the Russian one and was not so dependent on "oil dollars". And the stupid management of the then "elite" destroyed it (the economy).
        I don’t understand how you can be independent of someone while holding money (both yours and state's) in his pocket?
        Russia, and the BRICS are also slowly moving away from dependence on the dollar.
        The volume of our reserves is not so large as to scare amers by withdrawing these reserves to the yuan, for example.
        America certainly will not collapse, but the more others go away from the dollar, the faster it will learn to live within our means.
        Moreover, in addition to finance, the so-called "elite" holds there (abroad) its most sacred - children. It seems that the daughter himself is not in the country where he is for the president. But tell me, if God forbid, the time “Ch” comes, presses a button? Or an agreement with amers - Europe cannot be bombed ?!
        Unfortunately, we have in the government both corrupt and thieves, as elsewhere in the country. But personally, I believe and support the president and doubt that he can be blackmailed by anything. At the beginning of the 2000s, some tried to do this, and where did these people we all know very well.
  7. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
    Andrei from Chelyabinsk 20 September 2013 08: 40 New
    +3
    Moreover, the American strike will be brutal, because VTB, VEB and Gazprombank, comrade Boldyrev notes, operate mainly with currency, and all dollar transactions go through payment centers in the USA.

    If so, then this is very stupid. But I do not think this statement is true.
    1. vladsolo56
      vladsolo56 20 September 2013 08: 47 New
      +2
      Who do you think is more informed on economic issues, you or Boldyrev? what you think is only your opinion, Boldyrev relies on real data and knowledge on economic issues.
      1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
        Andrei from Chelyabinsk 20 September 2013 10: 29 New
        +7
        Quote: vladsolo56
        What do you think, who is more informed in economic matters, you or Boldyrev?

        This, alas, is unknown.
        Quote: vladsolo56
        what you think is just your opinion

        And what Boldyrev believes is only Boldyrev’s opinion
        Quote: vladsolo56
        Boldyrev relies on real data

        How, excuse me, do you know what Boldyrev relies on? Boldyrev is a publicist, first of all, and a politician.
        Quote: vladsolo56
        and knowledge of economic issues.

        A man who studied as an engineer and sociologist, but defended his Ph.D. in economics? Everything is possible...
        And now - briefly about the main thing.
        Never and under no circumstances do all dollar transactions go through and cannot go through some mythical US cash centers. Generally speaking, dollar transactions have nothing to do with US clearing centers. A dollar is just a currency and the sale and purchase transactions of the latter, as well as currency transactions are completed where it is convenient for the parties to the transaction. For example, I’m quite calmly conducting foreign exchange operations on the territory of the Russian Federation and America has nothing to do with it.
        Another question is that the same VTB may have a certain operator in the United States - a bank branch or just an affiliate that represents VTB's interests in the US financial markets. And HIS assets, yes, can be frozen. But if only VTB SPECIALLY did not drag their calculations to the United States (which is extremely doubtful because it smells like uniform idiocy), then the volumes of these acts are relatively small.
        There is still the option of freezing the funds that are provided by VTB by American banks (in fact, VTB lending), but in this case, the United States heats up first of all, freezing its own American funds. It’s easier not to provide them, and that’s all.
        Well, finally, if our banks have seriously invested in the US economy, these funds can also be frozen and withdrawn. But this has nothing to do with the announced Boldyrev dollar operations.
        1. vladsolo56
          vladsolo56 20 September 2013 10: 46 New
          -1
          well, if you consider yourself more knowledgeable, and smarter than Boldyrev precisely in economic matters, this is your right, but personally I trust him more, and not only him.
          1. Refund_SSSR
            Refund_SSSR 20 September 2013 11: 03 New
            +2
            If you consider Myself and this very comrade Boldyrev more competent than the professor, chief researcher at the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences Nikita Krichevsky, then I just don’t know what to think about you. hi
            You apparently just found a suitable opinion, which is pushing through as the truth you desire.
            Let's not rush to conclusions, but wait for the actions of the powerful and see ...
            Ultimately, neither this Boldyrev of yours, nor that professor Krichevsky, do not see and do not know the fullness of the levers of political and economic influence of the USA and the Russian Federation. and therefore can not give an objective assessment.
            Just suggest.
            1. vladsolo56
              vladsolo56 20 September 2013 11: 13 New
              -1
              Those. are you a professor Congratulations! If your professors are like Gaidar, Chubais, etc. then you can believe them, these are just your people. Success with such professors will go far.
              1. Refund_SSSR
                Refund_SSSR 20 September 2013 11: 17 New
                +3
                laughing Forgive generously, but you are talking nonsense!
                By the way, Boldyrev is not your brother? not swat? You somehow suspiciously firmly accepted his point of view, and the rest are insignificants ... Hmm ..
                All this is sad ...

                And yes, I am not a professor and do not pretend. I just call for a comprehensive look at the situation and simply demand that you do not spread alarmist moods among people. The dumping of deposits of the mentioned banks by depositors can lead to serious consequences ... Even more serious than US threats.
                Think with your head ... at least periodically and report to your irresponsible actions without owning the completeness of information fool
                Personally, you can prepare at least for the end of the world, but you do not need to duplicate your mistakes, based only on the words of one person, without putting the words of another person in anything.
                1. vladsolo56
                  vladsolo56 20 September 2013 12: 09 New
                  -1
                  Why, then, to one person, maybe you don’t know, but there are still professors such as M. Musin, and S. S. Gubanov. I also believe them, but I recommend you to be simply more modest in assessing the mental abilities of strangers to you. Although you may have megalomania, then you are excusable
                  1. Refund_SSSR
                    Refund_SSSR 20 September 2013 15: 22 New
                    +1
                    Quote: vladsolo56
                    I recommend that you just be more modest in assessing the mental abilities of strangers to you.

                    Who would say damn it, huh? laughing
                    Be easier ..
                    You are one expert in the true situation, but we all came to stand up.
                    1. vladsolo56
                      vladsolo56 21 September 2013 07: 54 New
                      0
                      You need to be simpler, for example, watch this video and do not fool people
                      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q7iZWzrP3xA
            2. Eugeniy_369
              Eugeniy_369 20 September 2013 15: 11 New
              +1
              Quote: We refund_SSSR
              Ultimately, neither this Boldyrev of yours, nor that professor Krichevsky, do not see and do not know the fullness of the levers of political and economic influence of the USA and the Russian Federation. and therefore can not give an objective assessment.
              Just suggest.

              You can’t say more precisely.
          2. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
            Andrei from Chelyabinsk 20 September 2013 11: 30 New
            +2
            Quote: vladsolo56
            but personally, I trust him more

            You can trust anyone, this is your personal right and I will not encroach on him.
            But personally, I prefer to check wink
      2. Eugeniy_369
        Eugeniy_369 20 September 2013 15: 10 New
        -1
        Quote: vladsolo56
        Who do you think is more informed on economic issues, you or Boldyrev? what you think is just your opinion

        Is Karl Marx probably hiding under the nickname Vernem_SSSR? Here recently, a member of the police union taught the academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences quantum theory ... it's like from this opera.
    2. Mikhail3
      Mikhail3 20 September 2013 09: 54 New
      12
      And you are right ... and not right. Direct calculations can be transferred within a few hours. In the world there are enough non-American banks that will never give up profits. Here's the question ... American banks have free money. To receive 80 billions a month into accounts, they don’t need any economy at all, the Fed gives them all this for nothing. What else is needed, they arbitrarily draw in any required volume. Technically, there are no restrictions; in fact, the Fed’s emission serves only as an explanation of where countless billions suddenly reappeared. And how many drew ....
      Therefore, money from American banks is the cheapest in the world. Well, they do not cost anything at all, although a cent of profit per million should be assigned to the Chase Manhattan Bank anyway. Therefore, our banks will instantly feel the loss, we don’t draw money, and the Chinese do not draw, and no one, because inflation simply limits the draftsman. And the dollar is more difficult ...
      And one more moment. Our banks bought all kinds of things in America. How not to buy when profit shines? And all this will be instantly put in an extremely difficult position. Losses will be great.
      In my opinion, Mr. Boldyrev (as befits our modern "expert") powerfully confuses God's gift with fried eggs. That is, he means that they will refuse to use the centers of international settlements themselves. It is completely numb .... This will mean the United States abandoning part of the real economy of the planet, with which they are cutting unjustified rents. This will instantly lead to the collapse of the American settlement system in general. Only confidence in its reliability makes the whole world work through it. One hint that a settlement can be dealt a political blow ....
      The world will instantly rush to go into alternative systems, which really do not exist. In particular, all holders of gold certificates will present them for gold. Given that this gold is framed each gram at the same time into hundreds of different, unsuspecting people and companies ... And this is not all.
      1. Denis_Rossiya
        Denis_Rossiya 20 September 2013 10: 04 New
        +2
        I absolutely agree with Mikhail3 !!!
        100
        a lot of experts divorced !!!
        1. vladsolo56
          vladsolo56 20 September 2013 10: 51 New
          0
          If Boldyrev is not an expert, then call an expert, but not yourself, of course, not Michael
          1. ksan
            ksan 21 September 2013 21: 08 New
            0
            If Boldyrev is not an expert, then call an expert, but not yourself, of course, not Michael
            Boldyrev is also a politician smile And when he speaks out, you always need to think what is more in his statements: policy or unbiased analysis. hi
      2. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
        Andrei from Chelyabinsk 20 September 2013 10: 31 New
        +1
        Quote: Mikhail3
        and my opinion, Mr. Boldyrev (as befits our modern "expert"), powerfully confuses God's gift with fried eggs. That is, he means that they will refuse to use the centers of international settlements themselves.

        It is doubtful :))) we are talking about the United States, and not about the whole world :)
      3. vladsolo56
        vladsolo56 20 September 2013 10: 50 New
        0
        The world has long been trying to switch to reserve currencies, and so what? who allowed them that? in words, everything is simple. However, why neither China nor Russia dared to turn their backs on the dollar. So Russia is firmly sitting on the dollar and is not going to crawl.
  8. 31231
    31231 20 September 2013 08: 53 New
    +1
    I agree with many, this is just a concussion of the fists. For the sake of Syria, they will not climb into the financial crisis. Their economy is already lame, and even with the seizure of accounts, they will prostrate themselves. We will also fall, but we will not get used to it, but a democratic Western society will have a hard time.
    1. Dangerous
      Dangerous 20 September 2013 15: 09 New
      0
      Nonsense! It will be hard not for any community out there that is firmly enough on its feet, but for our very real sector of the economy, including defense industry enterprises
  9. lewerlin53rus
    lewerlin53rus 20 September 2013 08: 56 New
    +5
    It is hoped that such threats will force our government to force measures to untie our economy from green cut paper. And other states will seriously consider whether it is safe to invest in the US economy.
  10. eplewke
    eplewke 20 September 2013 08: 56 New
    +7
    An ambiguous feeling arises. Aggravation of the Cold War. Yes, dear forum users, not the beginning of the Cold War, namely the aggravation ... because it never ended. For the American government, Russia is a bone in the throat, a splinter in a soft spot. Their dream is to bury us Russians ... But break yourself! Mangols, Napoleon and Hitler survived - and survive the mattresses! It is a fact!
    1. Dangerous
      Dangerous 20 September 2013 15: 13 New
      0
      So far, it is the mattress covers that are experiencing us: the average life expectancy in Russia is 69,8 years, and in America 78,1. So be careful with the slogans
  11. aszzz888
    aszzz888 20 September 2013 09: 08 New
    +5
    Dni.ru also indicates that VTB has already denied senators ’claims about Bashar al-Assad’s personal accounts. The press service of the bank said: “The statements of four US senators are the dissemination of completely unreliable information. In the VTB group there are no accounts of the leadership of Syria. We regard the words of the senators as a provocative attempt to mislead the US public. ”

    These "brave senators" do not know what to catch on. Let yourself bite your ass!
    To leave Russia from the dollar, and, together with the PRC, trample this green pyramid.
  12. Stiletto
    Stiletto 20 September 2013 09: 12 New
    +4
    "In short, a mixture of financial sanctions with the Magnitsky list."

    In short, Russia is no longer that country, and it will not succeed in throwing it on the headstock. The Yankees have received a decent response to the Magnitsky list, and will receive this time. After all, if anything, we can nationalize the Swiss bank Societe Generale and all other banks, either freeze accounts in them or transfer our assets frozen over the hill.

    Although, on the other hand, the oligarchs have already been told a million times: “Love your motherland!” Keep money at home, and let it work here. It seems that the history of Cyprus did not teach them anything.
  13. klip07
    klip07 20 September 2013 09: 18 New
    0
    and I would have closed all the banks and the basta ..... this is a waste ....
  14. patrianostra
    patrianostra 20 September 2013 09: 19 New
    +4
    The people of Cyprus are not enough for you. An illustrative example. What ratings and respect on the part of the enlightened Western banking community "eat the weak and if it is not weak, create the prerequisites for this" is the main principle by which the economy of advanced gayropays and Saskh live. Who doesn’t know sosch is the North American United States the full name of this entity. By the way, from the read by Amers, the most interesting system of power belongs to when any obligation made by the previous administration can always deflect the obligations of that team somewhere like that.
  15. 8NEO8
    8NEO8 20 September 2013 09: 23 New
    +4
    The four have already developed a proposal: the US Treasury Department should freeze the assets of Russian banks in the United States, ban their activities on American territory and impose restrictions on foreign travel of employees.

    In short, a mixture of financial sanctions with the "Magnitsky list."


    And let it freeze, maybe it will finally break through our “frostbitten Ilita” and they will cease to keep money in offshore. And maybe they will even begin to reform the Central Bank, it's time ...
    1. piterkras
      piterkras 20 September 2013 12: 28 New
      0
      And who will allow them? The US Fed will not allow it. And the assets and bank accounts in the West were created in order to force the powerful and the elite to do what the West needs. Well, it’s not worth investing in the banking system of the Russian Federation, which is not worth breaking up if you look at the Cyprus results.
  16. winkiller
    winkiller 20 September 2013 09: 25 New
    +5
    The worst thing is that the Central Bank of the Russian Federation will be dependent on the dollar until the constitution is changed. And no one gives this.
    1. a52333
      a52333 20 September 2013 10: 55 New
      +3
      The bill is pending. Resists (DG), but accepts. Silence does not work - because many people monitor. Vote against-like a tag hang on your neck "enemy of the people" So. what will slow down - but everything will be good
      1. piterkras
        piterkras 20 September 2013 12: 29 New
        0
        Are you ready for the new Iron Curtain and the next monetary problems of the late 80s that the West will inevitably impose?
      2. SunSanBel2003
        SunSanBel2003 22 September 2013 00: 21 New
        0
        Do you really believe in fairy tales that the Duma is not missing something that the Kremlin is introducing to it? Yes, the Duma does everything that Putin wants, does everything: Nabiulina, Golikova approved, under the Nabiullina it made the Central Bank also a mega-regulator, it ratified the WTO (they introduced it under President Putin and he campaigned for it), the Federal Service for State Budget Administration was adopted in the first reading, the "budget rule" (7% in the Reserve Fund) accepted, the RAS dug ...
        You, perhaps, also in a fairy tale that the president at us type as the notary only signs laws believe?
  17. morpogr
    morpogr 20 September 2013 09: 26 New
    0
    Let's scare your foolish ones, thereby you will once again show the whole world that any financial relations with the United States and the Dolar make other countries dependent and vulnerable. Thereby, you will accelerate the rejection of green trash and accelerate your destruction.
  18. chushoj
    chushoj 20 September 2013 09: 33 New
    +2
    From everything, I realized that either the United States no longer needs the dollar, or the United States will merge the Eurozone.
    1. vvvvv
      vvvvv 20 September 2013 09: 52 New
      +4
      The US acts against everyone. And merges the EU for a long time. This was manifested by the spread of the EU during the crisis of 2008 by US rating agencies, and the story of NSA spying, and the “wise” migration policy that came from somewhere into the heads of European authorities ...
    2. ksan
      ksan 21 September 2013 21: 17 New
      0
      chushoj Yesterday, 09:33

      From everything, I realized that either the United States no longer needs the dollar, or the United States will merge the Eurozone.
      The United States will always "merge" all those who are not with them, not with the dollar, who have their own opinions that are different from the American. America is built and stands on this, on its exclusivity in the world.
  19. pa_nik
    pa_nik 20 September 2013 09: 38 New
    +3
    You still have accounts in our banks, then we will go to you!
  20. fzr1000
    fzr1000 20 September 2013 09: 41 New
    0
    Otso ... si, America.
    1. fzr1000
      fzr1000 20 September 2013 15: 18 New
      -2
      Not a fright. All the same ots ... si.
      1. fzr1000
        fzr1000 20 September 2013 20: 22 New
        0
        McCain, did you crawl here as well? No fright ...
  21. darksoul
    darksoul 20 September 2013 09: 41 New
    +4
    Thanks to Jacob Lew for the revelation. Maybe ours will become smarter and will keep money in rubles and at home .... otherwise an excellent thread for which the states can pull our bureaucratic puppets
  22. pensioner
    pensioner 20 September 2013 09: 43 New
    +3
    Thanks Oleg!
    Quote: Mart
    Well, let us add from ourselves, there is every reason to assert that John Cornyn and K will not leave their anti-Russian and anti-Syrian inclinations ...
    Who would doubt that. And since they do not have to hold fantasies in these matters, it is necessary to carefully analyze all the possible actions of America in this direction. What would then not be excruciatingly painful ...
  23. vvvvv
    vvvvv 20 September 2013 09: 49 New
    +2
    I will say this: there is no silver lining. All such hostile moves will force Russia to escape from such dangers, which will further strengthen sovereignty. It is like a vaccination for immunization, i.e. all of these "minor tricks" the United States will not be able to destroy Russia, but it forces it to fight the introduced infection and develop sovereignty. What does not kill, it tempers. The United States itself is used to being in the role of an attacker, not a defender. And when similar internal or external threats affect them, then it can be destructive for them.
  24. magadanets
    magadanets 20 September 2013 10: 02 New
    +1
    But who are they these senators. They are not called by anyone. The US government is dependent on the bourgeoisie, or on business. If they freeze, the bourgeoisie will lose significant profit. Russia is not Mongolia, it’s not one million dollars to freeze. And then the Amer’s money invested not too little in Russia. So the bourgeoisie will send these senators far, far.
  25. kirk82
    kirk82 20 September 2013 10: 15 New
    +2
    Zaeali these s live do not give peace and quiet.
    What can be done to raise the troubles in the USA, to play on the emotions of Indians or to remind Negroes how their fathers were traded and humiliated, do you need to rid the authorities of freemasons, have any ideas? Or fucking in the USA with everything that is, destroy the great shaitan God will reward for it!
  26. FunkschNNX
    FunkschNNX 20 September 2013 10: 16 New
    +2
    Firstly, by freezing their accounts they will lose the correspondent remuneration that the United States receives for EVERY dollar operation in the world (in fact, doing nothing, but receiving, in addition to obvious profits, information about all world trade). And not a single capitalist wants to lose profits and information.
    Secondly: Russia, in turn, has "on hand" the debt securities of the US government, and the demand for redemption in the face of their enormous external debt and deficit of the state budget is a very unpleasant thing.
    Thirdly: even a hint of financial blackmail will stimulate the development of alternative schemes, for example through EUR or CNY.
    Fourth: any tension in relations can provoke a new "cold war", and no one needs it, it is more profitable to trade than to fight.
    In short, these mysters are shaking the empty air, no one will allow them to be bullshit.
  27. Ivanovich47
    Ivanovich47 20 September 2013 10: 47 New
    0
    Russian foreign exchange reserves are held in US banks. At the same time, 60% of assets are invested in securities. Do our bankers really have no leverage over the Americans, having huge deposits in Western banks (more than 500 billion dollars)? Maybe there is. And if events develop in an unfavorable direction, Russian banks should say their good word.
    1. regdan
      regdan 20 September 2013 10: 58 New
      +2
      In the Central Bank of Russia, where two thirds of the gold and foreign exchange reserves of the Russian Federation are located. The area of ​​the Central Bank of the Central Bank on Pravda Street in Moscow is 17 thousand square meters, the storage area is 1,5 thousand square meters. A standard gold bar in a vault has a weight of 10 to 14 kilograms, a measured bar is from 100 grams to 1 kilogram. Basically, Russia's gold reserves are stored in standard bullion.
      I want to see how the pasties from the Washington Regional Committee freeze them.
  28. Ivan Tarasov
    Ivan Tarasov 20 September 2013 10: 48 New
    +1
    That's fine!
    It will be an excellent occasion to nationalize the Central Bank of the Russian Federation and trade energy resources exclusively in rubles.
  29. shinobi
    shinobi 20 September 2013 10: 48 New
    0
    The senators decided to raise their ratings. They won’t go further than an empty talk. Thanks to the financiers, they will quickly explain what’s why and why. America needs a war, not a victory in the war. And the war needs to be financed from both sides of the front line. And they shut up. If this measure was needed, it would have been used for a long time. Although politicians have mattresses and puppets, analysts of their puppeteers are far from fools. Unfortunately.
  30. Igor Golov
    Igor Golov 20 September 2013 10: 56 New
    +3
    Glory to Kudrin, a militant Washington [I wanted to insert an indecent word, instead of a decent one, a real European]. Such as Kudrin used to be sentenced to death - for undermining the state. soldier
  31. Ingvar 72
    Ingvar 72 20 September 2013 11: 02 New
    +1
    But such blathering should serve as a reason for transferring foreign exchange reserves to gold. And then gold in these reserves is 10-12 percent, everything else is virtual paper of the US Federal Reserve. And the sooner the better. Enough to support the economy of a potential adversary, it's time to think about your own.
  32. Cherepanov66
    Cherepanov66 20 September 2013 11: 11 New
    +2
    If the United States does this, signs a death sentence for itself, China will see how "honestly" the Americans are doing business and what will happen if the interests of China affect the interests of the United States, the flight of money from American banks will begin, in the wake of China, the whole world will do the same ;% a USA
    1. chushoj
      chushoj 20 September 2013 11: 28 New
      +1
      The United States has already signed a verdict for not wanting to attack Syria by any means. And it's time for Iran. Apparently the United States is now accusing it, along with Abama, of collapsing the dollar. "Violinist" is no longer needed. At the expense of China, it is more complicated. China raises everybody for a month, it is an extremely friendly and united country. But the Germans wanted to concentrate their gold in their homeland in Germany, and so far it is not working out. China may “lower” the US more elegantly. The dollar and the euro are tied tightly to the price of goods in the eurozone. I think that the world community will move there.
  33. Pharao7766
    Pharao7766 20 September 2013 11: 13 New
    0
    LOTS OF LETTER

    Richard Blumenthal:
    Blumenthal was born in Brooklyn, New York, the son of Jane M. (née Rosenstock) and Martin A. Blumenthal, who was the president of a commodities trading firm. [4] [10] [11] His mother was born in Omaha, Nebraska, to a Jewish family that originated in Prussia and Baden, and his father was a Jewish immigrant from Frankfurt, Germany.
    It's clear here

    John Cornin
    Gene Shahin
    Jeanne Shaheen (born Cynthia Jeanne Bowers; January 28, 1947)
    Shaheen was born Cynthia Jeanne Bowers in Saint Charles, Missouri, the daughter of Belle E. and Ivan E. Bowers. [2]
    She is the wife of Lebanese-American attorney and political operative Bill Shaheen.
    Here you can see legs growing from Lebanon.


    Cornyn was born in Houston, the son of Atholene Gale Cornyn (née Danley) and John Cornyn II, a colonel in the US Air Force. [4] He attended the American School in Japan while growing up when his family moved to Tokyo. [5] He graduated from Trinity University in 1973, where he majored in journalism and was a member of Chi Delta Tau. [6] [7] He earned a JD from St. Mary's University School of Law in 1977 and an LL.M. from the University of Virginia School of Law in 1995. [8] [9]
    He served in San Antonio for six years as a district judge before being elected as a Republican in 1990 to the Texas Supreme Court, on which he served for seven years.
    From journalists to lawyers ... well, there’s a direct road to the fighters for world crap.

    Kelly Ayotte
    Ayotte was born in Nashua, New Hampshire on June 27, 1968, the daughter of Kathleen M. (née Sullivan) and Marc Frederick Ayotte. She attended Nashua High School. She received a BA from Pennsylvania State University in political science. While a student at Penn State, Ayotte was initiated into the Delta Gamma women's fraternity. [7] In 1993, Ayotte graduated from Villanova University School of Law, where she had served as editor of the Environmental Law Journal. [8]
    Ayotte clerked for Sherman D. Horton, associate justice of the New Hampshire Supreme Court, for one year. From 1994 to 1998, she was an associate at the Manchester law firm of McLane, Graf, Raulerson & Middleton. [9] In 1998, she joined the office of the New Hampshire Attorney General as a prosecutor. In 2003, Ayotte became legal counsel to Governor Craig Benson. Three months later, she returned to the attorney general's office as deputy attorney general. [10] In June 2004, Ayotte was appointed attorney general of the State of New Hampshire by Governor Craig Benson following Peter Heed's resignation. [11]
    Like Sahin from NewHampshire - (see this is the most caring state for shit democracy)
    the career is just mighty - a year as a clerk at the judge's assistant => 4, in a private eridic desk => 7 in the assistants to the state's state prosecutor => 3, a legal adviser to the governor => again to the public prosecutor AND O WONDER - IT'S ALREADY the senator.


    In general, it’s funny - all these organisms were in all kinds of societies like LAMBDA-CAPA. Looks like forged cadres of the world gendarmerie.

    Taken from - http://en.wikipedia.org
    1. Mart
      20 September 2013 12: 11 New
      +2
      Quote: Pharao7766
      the career is just mighty - a year as a clerk at the judge's assistant => 4, in a private eridic desk => 7 in the assistants to the state's state prosecutor => 3, a legal adviser to the governor => again to the public prosecutor AND O WONDER - IT'S ALREADY the senator.


      Kerry ate more quickly: http://topwar.ru/33142-patologicheskiy-lzhec-iz-gosdepa.html. hi
    2. Eugeniy_369
      Eugeniy_369 20 September 2013 15: 31 New
      +1
      Quote: Pharao7766
      the career is just mighty - a year as a clerk at the judge's assistant => 4, in a private eridic desk => 7 in the assistants to the state's state prosecutor => 3, a legal adviser to the governor => again to the public prosecutor AND O WONDER - IT'S ALREADY the senator.

      Ruslan Usmanovich Gattarov
      Born 09.01.1977/XNUMX/XNUMX
      Position: Member of the Federation Council
      At 36 years old and IT is already a senator .... and even extinguishes fires .... yes
      But generally funny .....
  34. Grbear
    Grbear 20 September 2013 11: 23 New
    +2
    What hysteria about some letter, even senators. The real "puppeteers" have not yet recovered from P.'s peace initiatives. And these are convulsive maneuvers, no more. Otherwise, it’s not “to spite mom ears"and a meter lower.

    Another question for our analysts (Boldyrev). Why compare the Kremlin’s domestic policy with foreign policy, and with the RAS in particular. Let, for starters, answer the question: "Why didn’t the eastern branches of the RAS come under the" press "?"

    Economics is not a double-edged sword. Even Marx’s grandfather didn’t understand its “ends”. And where something comes out is not a "senatorial" mind.

    And the banks will agree. Our banks have completed the official part. Raven crow ... not all peck.
    1. SunSanBel2003
      SunSanBel2003 22 September 2013 00: 35 New
      0
      1) There is no domestic policy that directly contradicts the foreign policy (or rather, what it is being served. Somewhere there is a catch ((
      2) About the eastern branches of the RAS.
      Here, read on the RAS website the official appeal to Putin and Co. of the leaders of these eastern departments of September 16.
      http://www.ras.ru/news/shownews.aspx?id=94450405-9a52-4b19-b8ad-0c539fabacf9#con
      tent
      And the fact that they are now left, as it were, but in the form of budget organizations subordinate to Academservice, is just a little slow down their collapse.
  35. nod739
    nod739 20 September 2013 11: 24 New
    +2
    let them freeze, - we have another reason to trample the path to the alternative currency (BRICS) and conduct part of the sales directly for the same yuan, bypassing the bank of New York
    they lose control over the information from the source of trade transactions. Well, the loss of any copecks in the form of a bank commission
  36. silver_roman
    silver_roman 20 September 2013 11: 30 New
    +1
    on the one hand, the creeps of various senators syshya is clear: yet another attempt to annoy Russia. But on the other hand, they are pushing us to become the path to further gaining our own sovereignty.
    If our specific accounts are frozen by the Fed, this will give an additional impetus to the development of our banking system and further abstraction from the dollar, which in the end will still give us a definite plus. The whole empire of Syshya is built on dollar dependence and the more countries begin to conduct their transactions in nat. currency, the stronger will be a blow to syshya. China and the Russian Federation have already switched to settlements in their currencies, which caused rabies from the Yankees.
    Here's an interesting video on the dollar:
  37. Peaceful military
    Peaceful military 20 September 2013 11: 38 New
    0
    So much for globalization, which is actually Pax Americana, or rather economic fascism. sad
  38. Ossetian.
    Ossetian. 20 September 2013 11: 39 New
    +1
    It seems that the Americans have no weak points !!!
    The judge on how our diplomats stepped up in the geopolitical arena, feels my heart felt for our so many weak spots, that this rotting country in the moral and moral sense will hardly seem fellow
  39. CCA
    CCA 20 September 2013 11: 53 New
    +3
    They are spinning like a snake in a pan, on which side is still pinching Russia ... I can’t bite anymore ...
  40. lotar
    lotar 20 September 2013 11: 58 New
    +2
    But I’m wondering who benefits from supporting the US economy in our country? Why can’t I make all or most of my payments in my currency? Why can’t I withdraw my country's reserve fund from the US? And finally, why don't the BRIC countries make their calculations in their own currency, well and how to continue the topic in general to introduce a single currency for your community? After all, the total population in these countries is a little more than 3 billion people, and this is not an unimportant fact.
    1. magadanets
      magadanets 20 September 2013 12: 42 New
      +1
      Think carefully yourself. Will they give us back the reserve fund of our country? Consider the reserve fund we have already given them. Nobody will ever give it back. Why? All because wink
  41. NORILCHANIN
    NORILCHANIN 20 September 2013 12: 02 New
    +1
    This is the result of the financial policy of yet another traitor of RUSSIA
    KUDRINA against his wall until he ran away to the masters in the USA.
  42. smsk
    smsk 20 September 2013 12: 04 New
    +1
    Let them freeze, at first it will be difficult, but after all, when it is necessary to get off the American financial hook. If they declare an economic war on Russia in this way, then they must respond in the same way, freeze their assets, confiscate their property on the territory of the Russian Federation.
  43. Just
    Just 20 September 2013 13: 15 New
    0
    Yuri Boldyrev is a liberal doctor. Why do we smart people listen to him?
  44. chunga-changa
    chunga-changa 20 September 2013 13: 25 New
    +1
    As usual, the whole question is the will and perseverance of the leadership.
    Every stick has two ends, and the Americans know that too.
  45. zub46
    zub46 20 September 2013 14: 15 New
    +1
    Article plus. Our financiers play out. The lever of influence against us is not very weak. If the states trample into nonsense, they will easily freeze the assets of our banks and other funds placed in the US financial system. The song about the need to slowly withdraw Russian funds from the USA has been going on for ten years. Woz and now there. Cheating?
  46. EGORKA
    EGORKA 20 September 2013 14: 38 New
    +2
    Iran lives with sanctions, has not died. And just like that, on a thought up, even a sash will not do such a thing, these measures will not kill Russia, Iran lives under sanctions, and Russian-American relations will break in this case. Plus, everyone will see that states cannot be trusted. And the opinions of our liberal experts are more like horror stories in unison with senators whose idol Zhirinovsky, who likes to shout something like that) IMHO
  47. regdan
    regdan 20 September 2013 14: 38 New
    +1
    Yes, chat only remains a false, corrupt US politicians. Neither what will they do, nor will they impose any sanctions. All this is bullshit. And you, dear readers, have arranged a circus here. These pasties from the Washington Regional Committee imposed sanctions against Iran, the DPRK, Syria, and that if they cannot cope with such countries, then Russia is like flying to another galaxy for them. You will not believe it, but the most insecure financial system in the world is in the USA. It is enough to start withdrawing money from the United States anywhere and the collapse for the whole of America. They say little about this and certainly do not write much, but some bad people have already tried to do this 2 times. "Fed print bucks" how much they write and say about it, Duc, but how do they print bucks? It’s just that you don’t print bucks, it means you need to go through all the bureaucrats and embezzlers in the USA, give everyone a paw and get permission. In how bucks print and a lot of printing is also dangerous, the more they print, the more inflation. "Bucks will collapse and us" EEE show me at least one idiot in the world who, after defaulting a buck, will sell goods, raw materials or provide services for a collapsed buck. “The ruble will collapse if the buck collapses” how much they say about this, yes, are you sure? What ruble to collapse if the buck is not alive. Well, in general, the era of fragmented currencies will begin, each country will pull a blanket over itself. Each country has something to offer the world, it will determine the strength of the currency of this country.
  48. IOwTZ
    IOwTZ 20 September 2013 15: 06 New
    +1
    Quote: OPATOP
    Quote: Ivan Tarasov
    It is enough to announce the sale of our resources exclusively for rubles.

    I agree with you. Only with a slight amendment. Not about the sale of resources should be discussed. And about the rejection of the dollar as a currency, and publicly declaring it a candy wrapper worthless. This will be a real blow to the United States.


    Do you think anyone will dare to declare publicly the dollar, candy wrappers and start selling exclusively for rubles. I will answer you - there is no such person yet. And those who are now in power are the same candy wrappers and collect, like we, in childhood, Turbo chewing gum liners.
    1. ia-ai00
      ia-ai00 20 September 2013 18: 58 New
      0
      The whole world is FOOLED! For candy wrappers EVERYTHING and "EVERYTHING" are sold! Everyone perfectly understands this, and humbly continue to FEED this cancer TUMOR - the USA, and if suddenly someone doesn’t want to "play" in the sandbox by their rules, they turn their hands out ...
  49. EGORKA
    EGORKA 20 September 2013 15: 15 New
    +1
    China is building up muscles and is also holding money in the United States, if the states try to do something similar, then China will obviously begin withdrawing its funds from the states, so that in case of disagreements with the states, there would be no blackmail. In general, Russia and our banks will not They don’t violate laws, on the contrary, going to such states makes a mess. Breaking goes to the USA, the world is changing, and many senators in the states will never change, but I think there are fewer of them, and the rest are aware of all the consequences of this step.
  50. Snoop
    Snoop 20 September 2013 18: 12 New
    +2
    Hmm, once again I am convinced of the wisdom of Stalin, it is a pity I did not manage to carry out the monetary reform of the Soviet ruble to the end ...
    If my memory serves me right, then our reserve fund is placed in American securities ...
    1. ia-ai00
      ia-ai00 20 September 2013 18: 44 New
      0
      Your memory does not fail you. Not only that, in "puffed", unsecured pieces of paper, so also in the United States, and not in Russia.
      There is a book by Nikolai Starikov “Sherche la oil. Why is our Stabilization Fund located TAM. "
      You can see the link:
      http://maultalk.info/knigi/shershe-lya-neft-pochemu-nash-stabilizacionnyj-fond-n
      axoditsya-tam.html
      ... So everyone wants to hear an intelligible answer, why not US machines or new enterprises are bought with the money of the Russian Stabilization Fund, but US treasury bonds. It is incomprehensible to ordinary people why our money does not work for us, but for the United States ...

      I, too, always always think that a normal person will deposit his hard-earned money for storage with a neighbor, even if they have FRIENDLY relations? What do you believe less in your family or in yourself than in the "partner" in the shoes and with the "face" of the dragon?
      On the subject:
      The Russian Stabilization Fund is our beautiful tomorrow, in which
      someone lives right now.