John Cornyn and K have found the weak point of Russia - banking assets in the USA

143
Economically advanced figures from the US Senate set out to arrange an artificial financial crisis in Russia. The harsh four "sanctioners" of 13 September appealed to the US Treasury with a call to block the access of some large Russian banks to the American financial system. We are talking about VTB, VEB and Gazprombank. Senators believe that these banks do business with the bloody Syrian regime, including receiving money for the C-300 air defense system. And at VTB, a chemical tyrant, the poisoner of his own people, Asad, generally keeps his savings for a rainy day.



“According to numerous reports, such banks as VTB, VEB and Gazprombank are, as usual, doing business with Syria, repeatedly undermining the sanctions imposed by the United States, the European Union and the United Nations. Such activities, it was reported, include assisting Vnesheconombank in making payments for C-300 rocket systems, storing President Asad’s personal assets in VTB, payments from Gazprombank for oil, lead senators "Days. Ru" with reference to the RIA "News».

A letter addressed to Jacob Lew was signed by Democratic Senators Richard Blumenthal, Gene Shaheen and Republicans John Cornyn and Kelly Ayotte.

These people believe that thanks to the assistance of Russian banks, the Syrian authorities are purchasing weapon and wage a civil war. In this regard, the letter says: "We believe that these institutions are involved in the ongoing brutal conflict in Syria and should be denied access to the American financial system."

The four have already developed a proposal: the US Treasury Department should freeze the assets of Russian banks in the United States, ban their activities on American territory and impose restrictions on foreign travel of employees.

In short, a mixture of financial sanctions with the "Magnitsky list."

Dni.ru also indicates that VTB has already denied senators ’claims about Bashar al-Assad’s personal accounts. The press service of the bank said: “The statements of four US senators are the dissemination of completely unreliable information. In the VTB group there are no accounts of the leadership of Syria. We regard the words of the senators as a provocative attempt to mislead the US public. ”

Reviewer Maxim Makarychev ("Russian newspaper") speaks of the senators' letter as an extremely tough "in tone". The correspondent also indicates that the Ministry of Finance of the United States did not comment on this appeal of the legislators.

Senator Blumenthal participated in a discussion on US policy toward Syria and Iran at the bipartisan policy center in Washington. His words are quoted by the Politico newspaper:

“The Syrians could not conduct this war without financing from Russia. We can freeze their assets. We can stop them from doing business in the United States, prevent their employees from entering the territory of (our country), which, in fact, can impose a very heavy financial burden on the Russians ... Nevertheless, much remains to be done. The administration (US) is putting pressure on the respective governments and companies to stop financial and other support for the Assad regime, and will continue to do so. ”


Andrey Polunin ("Free press") interviewed experts on the subject of sanctions against Russian banks. Politician and economist Yury Boldyrev said the following:

“If sanctions against Russian banks are imposed, this is a severe blow. Our entire financial system is not independent, and therefore vulnerable. At the same time, this is a very effective warning to the Russian authorities that they will not succeed in reaching an agreement with America: either you will crawl on your knees and beg forgiveness, or we will beat you in full.

Then how? Either you hand over the sovereignty of the country, and then you will bend down lower and lower, or you will desperately fight for independence - engineering, technological, defense. It is impossible to pretend at the same time that you are opposing the United States, and at the same time destroy the remnants of your own science. You can not simultaneously speak on the problem of Syria, as a measured, thoughtful force, which offers, without hurrying, to wait for the results of examinations, and at the same time push the destruction of the RAS at a leap. In fact, the question of the fate of our Academy of Sciences is no less complex and important than the Syrian one - why does the Kremlin behave differently in these situations ?! ”


The answer is simple, the expert believes. When the United States is hitting the Russian financial system, Moscow is unequivocally warned that in the framework of the dollar system, within the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, dependent on the dollar, Russia cannot gain sovereignty. If you gain sovereignty, explains the economist, so

“In full, including financial. The modern world does not offer any other option. Either crawling on my knees, or rising to my full height - there is no third option. ”


Moreover, the American strike will be the most severe, because VTB, VEB and Gazprombank, comrade Boldyrev notes, operate mainly with currency, and all dollar operations pass through settlement centers in the United States. VTB and VEB are “pieces of the state, albeit formally separated from it. To freeze their assets is almost the same thing as to freeze the assets of the Central Bank of Russia. ” As the next step, the expert says, Americans could arrest all the property of the Russian Federation in the United States. Between these two steps is not such a big distance, the analyst believes.

At the same time, Boldyrev does not think that the Americans will freeze Russian bank assets in the near future. However, the very senatorial warning -

“A very tough blackmail, designed for the fact that our government - portraying the appearance of independence - will, under pressure, hand over even more rapidly the strategic interests of the country”.


Nikita Krichevsky, a professor and chief researcher at the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, gave a “more moderate” opinion to the Free Press:

“Obama will not go to such sanctions. But if, hypothetically, this happens, VTB, VEB and Gazprombank will work with the States through other financial institutions, through correspondent accounts with other credit institutions. In my opinion, from an economic point of view, the measure proposed by the senators is completely empty. This is nothing more than demagoguery and shocking fists. "


However, Comrade Krichevsky also points out: American senators are thus beating on Russia, because two of the three banks are state banks. Therefore, the threat of sanctions is an additional tool of pressure on Russia on the Syrian issue.

Olga Gritsenko ("Sight") recalls that earlier in the media more than once wrote about the cooperation of Russian state banks with Damascus. For example, last year, the Financial Times reported: “While Western banks stopped their ties with Syria, Russian financial institutions - VTB, Vnesheconombank, and Gazprombank — work with it in the usual way.” And in May 2013 of the year in the Western press passed the information that Syria paid the cost of six C-300 complexes through VTB. Finally, quite recently, Reuters claimed that in recent months Damascus had transferred almost 1 billion to Moscow for four C-300 and 550 million for Moscow for 36 Yak-130 combat aircraft.

The head of the Center for Analysis of the World Arms Trade, Igor Korotchenko, told the newspaper Vzglyad:

“Domestic American legislation does not apply to the Russian Federation. Our supplies to Syria are absolutely legal and legitimate from the point of view of the norms of international law, since no sanctions were imposed at the level of the UN Security Council and there is no prohibition on military-technical cooperation with Syria. And the fact that the Americans impose some kind of sanctions does not mean that Russia should follow them. ”


According to Korotchenko, the American initiative is another “recurrence of the thinking of the times of the Cold War”. According to him, the introduction of sanctions against Russia can be regarded as arbitrariness: “This will be an unfriendly decision, and we, in turn, will have the right to retaliate, for example, to prohibit senators from entering Russia. We must respond to such tricks. In addition, the listed banks are respected in the international community, and international banks and financiers will negatively react to the initiative of US senators. ”

It is strange, of course, to believe, let us add on our own that the American senators are rushing to Russia or are frightened by such a terrible measure as the ban on visiting Moscow. On the other hand, it is too early to speak of retaliatory measures: it is unlikely that the petition, signed by just four senators, would later become valid.

Nevertheless, this document should be attached to the thick bundle of American papers that has accumulated on the so-called Syrian issue and which serves a single case, jointly promoted by the monarchies of the Persian Gulf, official Washington and the military-industrial complex circles behind congressmen: remove from power in Damascus, Assad and put there on the throne of some petty vassal from the "opposition", loyal to the White House and the Saudis from Qatar to the last pimple.

The petition of senators signals not only Russia and Syria, but the entire world community: Washington will never back down on the idea of ​​overthrowing Assad.

Meanwhile, official Damascus agrees to destroy its own chemical weapons. Already calculated the time and cost of such an operation.

The transfer of chemical weapons in Syria under international control will cost about 1 billion dollars and take about a year. This was said by Bashar Asad in an interview with Fox News, reports "Sight".

Syrian President explained: "This is a very difficult operation, it requires a lot of money, about 1 billion (dollars), and about a year - maybe less, maybe more." He added: "We are ready to transfer (chemical weapons) to any country that is ready to receive it."

Appeared in the press and the information that help Damascus in the export and destruction of chemical weapons will, in addition to UN experts, the military from several countries, including Russia.

How to write Elena Chernenko and Ivan Safronov (Kommersant), referring to an unnamed source in the General Staff of the Russian Federation, consultations are underway in the defense ministry “on the quantitative composition of the contingent”, which may be sent to Syria. The group is likely to include specialists from the radiation, chemical and biological defense forces of the RF Armed Forces. It is possible that a special forces brigade will be sent to the site of the operation.

It is not known how many servicemen Russia will send to Syria. “Different options are being considered. The exact number and composition of the contingent will depend on how many soldiers our foreign partners will provide for this mission, ”an anonymous source told Kommersant. He added that the total number of participants from all countries can be up to 10 thousand people.

Thus, while Russia and Syria implement their commitments to destroy chemical weapons, contributing to further peace negotiations there, some US senators seek to restore peace during the Cold War and show that America is in favor of democracy and disarmament, and Russia supports the bloodthirsty Syrian tyrant-poisoner, supplying him with weapons from under the floors.

In conclusion, the material is a few lines about Senator John Kornin, one of the signatories of the petition against Russian banks.

This man has consistently harmed Russia. At the end of last year, he acted as the author of an initiative to amend the US defense budget, which prohibits the Pentagon from making deals with Rosoboronexport. Cornyn said that Washington should abandon purchases from Russia: after all, it supports the Syrian authorities.

In 2012, Kornin did not succeed, although the Senate supported the amendment. The Senators were objected to the Pentagon, who considered that the choice of the Mi-17 was the best for the AF of Afghanistan.

However, John did not leave attempts. Not by hook or by crook ...

As reported by 18 on September 2013. correspondent ITAR-TASS Dmitry Kirsanov, a group of members of the US Congress in writing asked the US Attorney General, Attorney General Eric Holder to connect to the investigation of the circumstances of the Pentagon's purchase of Mi-17 helicopters for Afghanistan. The text of the letter, dated 16 September, was made public by John Cornin.

Legislators ask Mr. Holder to study information about possible abuse of power by the former and current management in charge of the non-standard helicopter program aviation US Army, which also includes the Mi-17 for the Afghan Armed Forces. Lawmakers insist that Holder "use all available resources, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation." Congressmen crave a “criminal investigation into the matter.” The petition was signed by 9 senators, including Kornin, and 23 members of the House of Representatives. The US Department of Justice has already confirmed that they are studying the letter.

Well, let us add from ourselves, there is every reason to assert that John Cornyn and K will not leave their anti-Russian and anti-Syrian inclinations ...

Observed and commented on Oleg Chuvakin
- especially for topwar.ru
143 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
  2. +8
    20 September 2013 08: 28
    “Obama will not go for such sanctions.

    Of course it won’t work.
    It is enough to shut off the tap at the pipeline to Europe, especially to NATO member countries. And it’s not the month of May in the yard, but in the USA and the geyrope da Aleko it’s not the best economic situation.

    But here's what began to take by the balls threats began to come, this is the very reason to stir not only the aforementioned banks, but not only in Russia.
    1. +40
      20 September 2013 08: 34
      Quote: GreatRussia
      It is enough to close the tap at the pipeline to Europe. And the yard is not the month of May.


      You will not find understanding in the Ministry of Finance and the raw oligarchs. According to Comrade. Lenin, politics is the most concentrated expression of economics. And the overlap of the tap is a way not only to the budget deficit, but also to large penalties. And in general, the Europeans - they seem to be not Americans ...

      Qatar, by the way, is just waiting for Russia to blunder with gas supplies. Another reason will be to accelerate the "democratization" of Syria.
      1. 0
        20 September 2013 09: 35
        Quote: Mart
        but also to major penalties.


        Read carefully again:

        “If sanctions against Russian banks are imposed, this is a severe blow. Our entire financial system is not independent, and therefore vulnerable. At the same time, this is a very effective warning to the Russian authorities that they will not succeed in reaching an agreement with America: either you will crawl on your knees and beg forgiveness, or we will beat you in full.
        1. +12
          20 September 2013 09: 42
          Quote: GreatRussia
          Quote: Mart
          but also to major penalties.


          Read carefully again:

          “If sanctions against Russian banks are imposed, this is a severe blow. Our entire financial system is not independent, and therefore vulnerable. At the same time, this is a very effective warning to the Russian authorities that they will not succeed in reaching an agreement with America: either you will crawl on your knees and beg forgiveness, or we will beat you in full.


          And where is Europe? smile Do you really believe that it is possible to blackmail the United States by turning off gas to EU countries and that the EU will not be responsible for non-delivery of fines? Either you really believe, or I don’t understand you at all.
          1. +2
            20 September 2013 09: 49
            Quote: Mart
            And where is Europe? smile Do you really believe that you can blackmail the United States by cutting off gas to EU countries and that the EU will not be responsible for non-delivery of fines? Either really believe me, or I don’t understand you at all.


            In Europe and the United States almost simultaneously announced a global economic project. In record time - until the end of 2014 - it should be implemented as a transatlantic free trade area (TAFTA - Transatlantic Free Trade Area). The rush with which its potential participants embarked on this grandiose project is evidenced by the fact that already in March, representatives of the European Union are ready to convey their position to the US side in negotiations that will begin no later than the end of June.

            At a time when the EU economy is in a state of stagnation, and US manufacturers are looking for new sales marketsOne should only wonder why such an idea has not been implemented before. Today, she is supported by representatives of the largest and most influential business and industrial lobby groups on both sides of the Atlantic.

            http://gazeta.zn.ua/international/evropa-i-ssha-sozdadut-ekonomicheskoe-nato-_.h
            tml


            And now think. The overlap of the crane in response to an economic and financial attack on the Russian Federation (otherwise quoted from the article can not be called) will definitely have a deplorable effect on the largest market for US goods.
            Do you think this will affect the already shaky economy of the star-striped creature?
            1. +15
              20 September 2013 09: 57
              Quote: GreatRussia
              And now think. The overlap of the crane in response to an economic and financial attack on the Russian Federation (otherwise quoted from the article can not be called) will definitely have a deplorable effect on the largest market for US goods.
              Do you think this will affect the already shaky economy of the star-striped creature?


              Dear friend! What is the overlap?

              Gazprom exports gas to the countries of Central and Western Europe mainly under long-term contracts of up to 25 years, concluded, as a rule, on the basis of intergovernmental agreements.

              Long-term contracts with petroleum products and the take-or-pay condition are the basis for the stability and reliability of gas supplies. Only such contracts can provide the manufacturer and the exporter with a guarantee of return on the multi-billion investments required for the implementation of major gas export projects, and the importer with a guarantee of reliable and uninterrupted gas supply over a long period of time.

              Today, the portfolio of signed long-term contracts of Gazprom provides at the level of minimum obligations the sale of 4 trillion cubic meters. meters of gas to non-CIS countries for the period until the expiration of the contracts.

              Among the main features of long-term contracts are the following:

              price formula that takes into account changes in prices for petroleum products for the previous 6 – 9 months;
              conditions that prevent the unilateral termination of contracts, except in cases of prolonged force majeure;
              “take or pay” terms that apply to a significant contractual volume, which stipulate that the buyer pays volumes that are not selected for the year and may subsequently be withdrawn with an appropriate surcharge upon delivery of the minimum annual volumes stipulated by the contracts in the relevant year. ”

              Source: "Gazprom", section "Europe".

              Read: "... in the framework of long-term contracts for up to 25 years, concluded, as a rule, on the basis of intergovernmental agreements"; "... conditions that prevent the unilateral termination of contracts, except in cases of prolonged force majeure."

              What kind of attitude towards Russia will be in Europe after such a political overlap of the tap, do you think?
              1. +3
                20 September 2013 10: 02
                Quote: Mart
                Read: "... in the framework of long-term contracts for up to 25 years, concluded, as a rule, on the basis of intergovernmental agreements"; "... conditions that prevent the unilateral termination of contracts, except in cases of prolonged force majeure."

                What kind of attitude towards Russia will be in Europe after such a political overlap of the tap, do you think?


                Oh, mdy ..
                You again did not understand that if the United States attacked the Russian Federation, in particular:

                To freeze their assets is almost the same as freezing the assets of the Central Bank of Russia. ” As the next step, the expert says, the Americans could have seized all the property of the Russian Federation in the United States.


                “If sanctions against Russian banks are imposed, this is a severe blow. Our entire financial system is not independent, and therefore vulnerable. At the same time, this is a very effective warning to the Russian authorities that they will not succeed in reaching an agreement with America: either you will crawl on your knees and beg forgiveness, or we will beat you in full.


                , then the Russian Federation has one way out, either to kneel or to retaliate economically, because it’s simply not enough to lose the Russian Federation.
                This is WAR, dear comrade.
                1. +6
                  20 September 2013 10: 41
                  Has the history of Cyprus not taught the Russian oligarchs to refuse to keep money over the hill? Now the looming prospect of losing money even on a large scale in America. I don’t think that the United States will decide to take such a step, otherwise Russia may take counter-American counter-steps: for example, oblige America to exchange dollars for gold, in case of refusal and this will announce to the whole world that the USA does not fulfill its earlier obligations to exchange dollars for gold and The dollar is not a world currency since it is not supported by gold. Even if our demand for protest is ignored by America, it will still seriously shake the dollar. It will be necessary to exchange stocks of dollars for gold and currencies of other countries as soon as possible. Refuse to make payments for oil and other goods for dollars. Well, put the S-300 to Iran, Syria and many countries with which the United States is not friends. There are many reciprocal levers of pressure; amers understand this, so I won’t aggravate it. So scare.
                  1. +7
                    20 September 2013 13: 53
                    Quote from astra
                    Has the history of Cyprus not taught the Russian oligarchs to refuse to keep money over the hill? Now the looming prospect of losing money even on a large scale in America.


                    Taught. The population and image of Russia will be brought to their knees. Well, not by ourselves ...
                  2. No_more
                    +2
                    20 September 2013 17: 00
                    She taught those who love to work, and those who do not want - no. Withdraw money to the "west" - as a rule for the lazy, leave it here or send it to the "east" - for the smart and those who want to earn more.
                2. Natalia
                  0
                  20 September 2013 11: 21
                  Quote: Mart
                  What kind of attitude towards Russia will be in Europe after such a political overlap of the tap, do you think?

                  Quote: GreatRussia
                  RF simply will not be horseradish.
                  This is WAR, dear comrade.

                  heated discussion ... like in that song ...
                  And the two did not agree on fear, but on conscience,
                  The wheels drove away a dream:
                  One said: Our life is a train,
                  Another said: Perron.
              2. +4
                20 September 2013 13: 47
                blocking a gas pipe can be sued in an international court. What decision the court will make even now is known. Then you will have to not only open the pipelines anew, but also pay heavy fines. It’s not so simple.
            2. +3
              20 September 2013 11: 26
              You carry nonsense. What does Europe and gas have to do with it ?!
            3. +2
              20 September 2013 13: 47
              Quote: GreatRussia

              And now think. The overlap of the crane in response to an economic and financial attack on the Russian Federation (otherwise quoted from the article can not be called) will definitely have a deplorable effect on the largest market for US goods.
              Do you think this will affect the already shaky economy of the star-striped creature?




              According to Korotchenko, the American initiative is another "relapse of thinking during the Cold War." According to him, the imposition of sanctions against Russia can be regarded as arbitrary: “This will be an unfriendly decision, and we, in turn, will have the right to take retaliatory measures, for example

              For example, to begin procedures for transferring international financial transactions for the sale of raw materials to ruble (i.e., abandoning the dollar in the economy). Hard, hard BUT ...
          2. +15
            20 September 2013 11: 13
            Quote: Mart
            Do you really believe that it is possible to blackmail the United States by turning off gas to EU countries and that the EU will not be responsible for non-delivery of fines? Either you really believe, or I don’t understand you at all.


            Oleg! Nice review thanks! I noticed only one detail. They propose to "impose" the activity Putin's banks-VEB, VTB and Gazprombank - for some reason, there is no talk about other "Russian" banks ... Another pressure and blackmail is directed at Putin, who dared to implement the idea of ​​creating a BRICS Development Bank, that is, these five countries (Brazil, India, China, Russia and South Africa, if I am not mistaken) created a fund and a financial structure of a bank with a total capital of about $ 150 billion (I may be wrong in the numbers). the purpose of which is to maintain the stability of the national currencies of the BRICS countries. That is, it is argued that five countries have set up their own monetary fund, an alternative to the IMF.
            Maybe this is the root of this blackmail? In general, there is very little information in the media about this. I would like to see an overview on this topic. Moreover, despite all the statements, the FRS did not stop the printing press and the dollar went down, and in the IMF, peripheral countries increasingly began to put pressure on the countries of the "golden billion" demanding a revision of quotas. And therefore, the West can easily close a shop called the IMF and create some new international fund in the image and likeness of the IMF. By the way, after the financial crisis, our gay European friends created something similar called European Financial Stabilization Fund (EFSF) , now here the BRICS countries have fussed ... So American threats are not so terrible as it seems ..
            1. +2
              20 September 2013 12: 09
              Quote: Ascetic
              Oleg! Nice review thanks! I noticed only one detail. They propose to "impose" exactly the activities of Putin's banks - VEB, VTB and Gazprombank - for some reason, there is no talk of other "Russian" banks ... Another pressure and blackmail is on Putin, who dared to implement the idea of ​​creating a BRICS Development Bank , that is, these five countries (Brazil, India, China, Russia and South Africa, if I am not mistaken) have created a fund and a financial structure of a bank with a total capital of about $ 150 billion (I may be wrong in the numbers). the purpose of which is to maintain the stability of the national currencies of the BRICS countries. That is, it is argued that five countries have created their own monetary fund, an alternative to the IMF.
              Maybe this is the root of this blackmail? In general, there is very little information in the media about this. I would like to see a review on this topic.


              Good day, Stanislav! If something interesting appears in the foreign press, I will try to do a review. hi
      2. +9
        20 September 2013 10: 57
        Nothing should be blocked.
        It is enough to announce the sale of our resources exclusively for rubles.
        1. bif
          +5
          20 September 2013 11: 47
          My thoughts are direct, to sell for national currency (rubles) or even better for GOLD (as the states charged us for Lend-Lease), and to buy for "green candy wrappers with dead presidents", which will soon become worthless ... It even sounds funny, that a bankrupt country with a debt that is simply not realistic to repay and the lack of gold in storage will impose sanctions ... it is enough to sell all the dollars from the Gold and foreign exchange reserve of the Russian Federation (buy another currency or gold) and everything will come ... and if we will be joined by China (the main creditor of the United States), then the US economy will float like the Titanic ... It is time for gentlemen senators to think not about sanctions, but about which US territories they will repay for debts ... soon)))
        2. +3
          20 September 2013 12: 13
          Quote: Ivan Tarasov
          Nothing should be blocked.
          It is enough to announce the sale of our resources exclusively for rubles.

          Ett for sure, and rubles only for gold wink
        3. OPATOP
          +5
          20 September 2013 12: 59
          Quote: Ivan Tarasov
          It is enough to announce the sale of our resources exclusively for rubles.

          I agree with you. Only with a slight amendment. Not about the sale of resources should be discussed. And about the rejection of the dollar as a currency, and publicly declaring it a candy wrapper worthless. This will be a real blow to the United States.
          1. stroporez
            0
            22 September 2013 12: 16
            Quote: OPATOP
            And about the rejection of the dollar as a currency, and publicly declaring it a candy wrapper worthless.
            -------- that's when the "hot" phase of the war will begin ....... amers are not our "leaders" -------- I think they won't chew snot for a long time.
    2. +14
      20 September 2013 08: 42
      Quote: GreatRussia
      It is enough to shut off the tap at the pipeline to Europe

      Nonsense. The pipeline and other sanctions will only lead to a new world crisis. And there .. everything is possible.
      It’s another matter that Americans risk their investments very much. Such actions will lead to a natural outflow of deposits of other countries from the USA. China in the first place. Yes and smaller investors will leave. And there the death of a world currency called the buck is just around the corner. And therefore, world hygemony is covered by a copper basin.
      Americans are not stupid and will not want to joke with such things.
      1. Natalia
        +1
        20 September 2013 09: 36
        Quote: domokl
        Americans are not stupid and will not want to joke with such things.

        And besides, the dollar is not provided with anything, and we have gold for every ruble ... and then, in other countries in the same China the same situation.
        If we say everyone starts to withdraw their money and transfer from the dollar to something, then naturally candy wrappers will become candy wrappers ...
        The dollar today rests on fear, on wars, on the tarnished reputation of the United States as a world power ... it will surely collapse someday, too unreliably.
        1. +17
          20 September 2013 09: 39
          Unfortunately, we have only a dollar for each ruble. Everything else is first converted to Baku, and then it is already exchanged into rubles - for which thanks to Chubais, Gaidars, Yeltsin, Gorbachev and so on.
        2. +7
          20 September 2013 11: 46
          Quote: Natalia
          and we have gold for every ruble


          Alas, it would be nice to be so, but the ruble unfortunately is closely tied to the dollar.
          1. Cpa
            0
            20 September 2013 19: 56
            Quote: Ascetic
            Alas, it would be nice to be so, but the ruble unfortunately is closely tied to the dollar.

            In my opinion, the ruble is closely tied to the Swiss franc.
          2. 0
            21 September 2013 20: 18
            Ascetic SU Yesterday, 11:46 ↑

            Quote: Natalia
            and we have gold for every ruble


            Alas, it would be nice to be so, but the ruble unfortunately is closely tied to the dollar.
            But everything seems to go all the same to the "Gold Standard" or at least to several more reserve currencies. Both Russia and China have been intensively replenishing gold reserves in recent years. Russia (Central Bank) buys more than 100 tons of gold every year, there is no data on China (on purchases) but extracts more than 300 tons per year.
    3. +8
      20 September 2013 08: 47
      Quote: GreatRussia
      “Obama will not go for such sanctions.

      On the other hand, maybe they can freeze everything that is possible, they are scumbags ...
      Maybe at least it makes the authorities go to full financial independence ...
      1. +1
        20 September 2013 09: 38
        Forgive me for swearing, but these Fuck *** YOU Americans, nnuuu very good! It seems that they have no brains at all!
        (c) M.Zadornov: well, stupid people, well, stupid people ....
      2. +5
        20 September 2013 09: 57
        now in the financial and economic block of the government and financial structures the overwhelming majority of the "Gaidar's friends" club, in order to do something seriously (not under the blanket on the sly), it is necessary to rewrite the law on the central bank, and then all the bylaws and related laws, This pack will try to prevent it while at the helm, already now they are getting underfoot in every possible way and are engaged in sabotage, it is useless to clean up Gref alone or Ulyukayev, say, structural changes must be made, although of course the shooting of one villain sobering up a hundred like him.
    4. Sadikoff
      +1
      20 September 2013 09: 40
      It’s not necessary, just to sell everything for Russian rubles.
    5. +15
      20 September 2013 09: 44
      It is necessary to withdraw assets from the United States. It’s like in banks, if a bank blundered and depositors massively start taking money, then consider such a bank to come. Following Russia, several more countries will begin to withdraw, and so on, by increasing to default.
      1. +3
        20 September 2013 10: 09
        Quote: Max Otto
        It is necessary to withdraw assets from the United States.

        I completely agree. You got ahead of me.
      2. 0
        21 September 2013 20: 24
        Max Otto SU Yesterday, 09:44 ↑

        It is necessary to withdraw assets from the United States. It’s like in banks, if a bank blundered and depositors massively start taking money, then consider such a bank to come. Following Russia, several more countries will begin to withdraw, and so on, by increasing to default.
        It is necessary not to "break" the branch on which you sit, but carefully (so as not to fall painfully smile ) get off him.
    6. +4
      20 September 2013 10: 05
      GreatRussia SU Today, 08:28 AM

      “Obama will not go for such sanctions.

      Of course it won’t work.

      About Cyprus, too, they said so, and everyone saw how it ended.
      In general, until we get away from dollar dependence, nothing good can come to an end for us. And for this it is necessary to amend the Constitution on the Central Bank of the Russian Federation.
      According to the Constitution, the Central Bank of the Russian Federation does not depend on either the president or the State Duma; someone knows a funnier joke. . . .
      A special place is occupied by the constitutional powers of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, enshrined in Article 75 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation.
    7. +4
      20 September 2013 10: 05
      Quote: GreatRussia
      Of course it won’t work.

      I’d better go. Let them block the green frantic until it stops.
      Maybe then our financial geniuses will stir and stop curling our brains with purchases of dollars and US government bonds.
    8. +6
      20 September 2013 10: 45
      Quote: GreatRussia
      Of course it won’t work.

      It will, it will not, it does not matter. But there was a good reason to withdraw assets from Western banks, especially from the USA ...
    9. +5
      20 September 2013 11: 11
      It will be enough just to stop processing uranium for American nuclear power plants at our plants - and after a while, most of the American nuclear power plants will stop, because the USA has no processing facilities ... And then they really let them prove that they have a shale revolution . Only one minus - it will also hit us seriously, but not so hard.
    10. Airman
      +1
      20 September 2013 11: 48
      [quote = GreatRussia] [quote] "Obama will not go for such sanctions. [/ quote]
      Hope for God, but don’t be bad yourself! Therefore, there is little hope for Obama, he does not decide anything on his own, he is a puppet in the hands of financial tycoons, therefore, if it will be profitable for them, then ......
    11. w.ebdo.g
      +1
      20 September 2013 13: 33
      talk about the sovereignty of Russia.
      The most interesting are the first 45 minutes ...
      It explains why the President asks the government to make the necessary decisions, and the government, on the contrary, makes decisions that are beneficial for our enemies in the United States.
    12. artemiy
      +1
      20 September 2013 13: 37
      We can also be in a place with China! Go to rubles and yuan! AND KIRDYK AMERICA! They’ll hurt themselves more by blocking our cash flows! It's just a rotten burp of makeup!
  3. +8
    20 September 2013 08: 30
    "The senators' petition signals not only Russia and Syria, but the entire world community: Washington will never back down from the idea of ​​overthrowing Assad."

    "Carthage must be destroyed." As the whole history of mankind shows, concessions to the aggressor never led to peace, no matter what they were. As a result, the victim was still attacked and captured. Only toughness, only struggle and demonstration of determination, flirting with a hyena is like death.
  4. +9
    20 September 2013 08: 36
    By the way, this is bad (the next run-up to the external assets of the Russian Federation) - it has its own good: GDP promotes the policy of asset recovery from offshore. And big business should think:
    1) Cyprus
    2) Remember two weeks ago the roll-over on the assets of the "son" of the Minister of Transport of the Ministry of Defense
    3) Today's situevina.

    Let big business THINK STRONGLY.
    1. Airman
      +3
      20 September 2013 09: 27
      Quote: a52333

      Let big business THINK STRONGLY.

      And what should he think, he is all (big business) oriented to the west, they all, when the freebie ends to rob people, will be dumped there. Abramovich has not lived in Russia for a long time, he comes here on short visits. Moreover, all foreign exchange reserves are in the banks of the Americans.
      1. +4
        20 September 2013 10: 12
        Quote: Povshnik
        Abramovich has not lived in Russia for a long time; he comes here on short visits
        Abramovich let him remember the fate of Berezovsky. West, recently, like a mad dog - it is not clear who will bite the next.
    2. avt
      +5
      20 September 2013 09: 50
      Quote: a52333
      By the way, this is bad (the next run-up to the external assets of the Russian Federation) - it has its own good: GDP promotes the policy of asset recovery from offshore. And big business should think:

      Well, VVP told them at one time about their money in the West, what a hedgehog, "you are tortured to swallow dust" laughing Well done Americans! In the idiotic, children's fervor, they very clearly explained who was the boss in the American house. laughing And then all the "inviolability of private property", the triumph of law and law ",,, human rights" laughing
  5. mogus
    +9
    20 September 2013 08: 38
    The harsh four “sanctioners” on September 13 called on the US Treasury Department to block the access of some large Russian banks to the US financial system.
    Block please! You will rob profits - the holiest thing to bankers. Maybe then they will stir and quickly untie the ruble from the dollar ..?
  6. vladsolo56
    +9
    20 September 2013 08: 39
    That’s Russia's independent policy, laughter and that’s all, and that’s just a petty cause for disagreement, and if something serious happens, America will collapse our economy in a matter of days. All normal economists and politicians in Russia have already spoken about this many times, and whoever listens to them, Uncle Sam still commands our government.
    1. vladsolo56
      +5
      20 September 2013 09: 02
      I am struck by the obstinacy of some, not knowing the topic, and not even trying to delve into it, based only on slogans and declarations, they stubbornly do not want to see reality, moreover, at all levels they are ready to defend their mistakes. This is me to the fact that the first cons went from those who have unlimited faith, beloved, respected, dear, etc.
      1. ksandr45
        +7
        20 September 2013 09: 34
        In the pros and cons to you was not noticed. My question is, if America can so easily bring down our economic system, why doesn’t it? Maybe their bankers are not making bad profits on us? And what, for example, should there be disagreements so that the amers decide to freeze the assets of our banks?
      2. Natalia
        +4
        20 September 2013 09: 55
        Quote: vladsolo56
        This is me to the fact that the first cons went from those who have unlimited faith, beloved, respected, dear, etc.

        I must say that I am you not minus.....However...
        It seems that you are one of those people who believe that: 1) Putin is an American spy, 2) Everything is hopeless 3) We will all die 4) But we used to live well.
        Well, that's about all your arguments ... here you condemn the people who are here as you say
        Quote: vladsolo56
        the obstinacy of some, not knowing the topic, and not even trying to delve into it, based only on slogans and declarations,

        ... yes, exactly, isn’t it better to pronounce slogans than how to dissolve some nozzles ....
        1. vladsolo56
          +2
          20 September 2013 12: 17
          I can answer you and advise you to read again what I wrote, where you saw the panic and specifically where it is written that these statements will bring down the Russian economy. Do you have fog in your eyes? I wrote that if America wants, in the event of a serious conflict, it will bring down the Russian economy. So before you draw conclusions, learn to carefully read and comprehend what you read. And you can not dismiss the snot about it and do not ask. Slogans, yes, please, as much as you like, can you eat slogans?
          1. Natalia
            +1
            20 September 2013 12: 32
            Quote: vladsolo56
            I wrote that if America wants to,

            Well, again, the argument is vague, if yes, if only ...
            so argue ....
            Now, if Russia wants to, then America will stop wanting one day ... for we possess nuclear weapons of our own will.
            I personally do not aim to ridicule you somehow, just argue, suggest some options ... otherwise you write everything badly, badly, very badly ... yes, you can’t, you don’t know ...

            Just based on your posts, life is hopeless, we cover ourselves with a sheet and slowly crawl into the cemetery, slowly so as not to create a panic.
            With all due respect.
            1. vladsolo56
              0
              20 September 2013 12: 55
              You know, it’s better to see more bad things and understand that this is bad, at least you’ll think how to do what would be better than rejoicing that everything is fine now, and what will be tomorrow is not important, for many years I worked as an accountant from an ordinary to the main one, and a little I understand economics. And besides, everything that I read and listen to from people who are more informed than me shapes my worldview. I am not only a supporter of Boldyrev, but also S. S. Gubanov, M. M. Musin. Delyagina MG .. Again, these people are not authorities for you. You want to see everything through rose-colored glasses, only when suddenly these glasses burst, you will not like what you see. But it is quite possible that you already have a house somewhere over the hill in the "village"
              1. Natalia
                +1
                20 September 2013 13: 44
                Quote: vladsolo56
                But it is quite possible that you already have a house somewhere over the hill in the "village"


                All your people are traitors, everyone dreams of dumping, throwing, deceiving ... it means that you are just a person who is more profitable to see more bad things. You have the logic of an eternally suffering, rejected, unrecognized genius ... if those around you do not share your convictions, then they are traitors and they have a house over the hill in the "village".
                I feel sorry for you ....
                1. vladsolo56
                  0
                  20 September 2013 14: 28
                  And you do not spare me
                  Quote: Natalia
                  Quote: vladsolo56
                  But it is quite possible that you already have a house somewhere over the hill in the "village"


                  All your people are traitors, everyone dreams of dumping, throwing, deceiving ... it means that you are just a person who is more profitable to see more bad things. You have the logic of an eternally suffering, rejected, unrecognized genius ... if those around you do not share your convictions, then they are traitors and they have a house over the hill in the "village".
                  I feel sorry for you ....

                  But you all know everything about everyone and understand everything, it’s simply amazing and why are you not in the Kremlin yet. Do not identify with all people, this is not modest.
                  1. Natalia
                    +1
                    20 September 2013 15: 03
                    Quote: vladsolo56
                    , it is not modest

                    Dear, you must be modest in a public toilet in order to quietly enter and even more quietly exit.
                    1. vladsolo56
                      0
                      20 September 2013 16: 15
                      You probably have a lot of experience in this, I’ll take into account the future, at least learn something from you
      3. +3
        20 September 2013 10: 50
        I put a minus.
        First of all, for responding to the pros and cons laughing and not just react, but on the basis of minuses accuse people of illiteracy!

        Now to the point.
        First:

        There are a lot of American assets as well as American property (including large companies, including the personal business of congressmen) in Russia.
        It is enough to nationalize subsidiaries and hydrocarbon deposits purchased by the United States and all losses from freezing bank accounts will be compensated for in excess. (what are the signed PSAs for the Vityaz brand of Sakhalin oil, one of the most valuable in the world).

        Second:
        We have already gone through the freezing of accounts in Cyprus, and as you can see, the crisis did not come (unfortunately the West), but a crisis of confidence and serious talk about creating a BRIS bank.
        Do you think that such a move on the part of the United States (those in debt ...) will be positively perceived by their creditors? Or will the world community once again look for a way to shove the dirty unreliable wrappers of a dying hegemon? and how will all this affect the US economy in the future ???

        Well and thirdly: To blindly rely on the words of Bolyrev is just ridiculous, who is Boldyrev ???
        For example, a professor, chief researcher at the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences Nikita Krichevsky believes that this measure of the United States is absolutely empty (is it probably stupid and not competent in your opinion?)

        So MINUS TO YOU! laughing It’s too early to yell that everything is gone, we’ll finish the look.
        1. vladsolo56
          0
          20 September 2013 19: 10
          You learned how to write, and you seem to know how to read, but for some reason you don’t understand the meaning of what was written, you can re-read my comment again before writing what you wrote.
      4. 0
        21 September 2013 20: 36
        vladsolo56 RU Yesterday, 09:02 ↑

        I am struck by the obstinacy of some, not knowing the topic, and not even trying to delve into it, based only on slogans and declarations, they stubbornly do not want to see reality, moreover, at all levels they are ready to defend their mistakes. This is me to the fact that the first cons went from those who have unlimited faith, beloved, respected, dear, etc.
        For example, I do not minus if I simply do not agree. And you would also instead of unfounded statements like"This is the independent policy of Russia, laughter and nothing else, and this is just a minor reason for disagreement, and if something serious happens, America will bring down our economy in a matter of days." would have taken and deployed where, how, and why Uncle Sam still commands our government. I am sure you would be immediately instructed ++++ if they are so important to you hi
    2. Denis_Russia
      +5
      20 September 2013 09: 57
      To say that these measures will bring down the economy ... is too loudly said. Problems will be enough, but not bring down. And besides, few people pay attention to the fact that this is not profitable for the owners. Russia is the creditor of Pindland ... and China is the largest creditor. And having forgiven debts to Russia ... they will bear reputation risks. States will begin to get rid of such debts. And as mentioned above .... even removing the ability to use the dollar for international transactions, there will always be those who will be ready to help for a small percentage.
    3. +1
      20 September 2013 10: 56
      Quote: vladsolo56
      That’s Russia's independent policy, laughter and that’s all, and that’s just a petty cause for disagreement, and if something serious happens, America will collapse our economy in a matter of days.

      It’s easy in the early 90s, but not now. The Russian economy is very much intertwined with the European economy. A strong economic downturn will dramatically affect the production in Europe and the United States. (Do you remember how all of America’s largest producers turned up against Bush, who had hinted at sanctions against Russia in 2008.)
      Russia is now the world's 6th economy, and its collapse will hit everyone.
    4. Eugeniy_369
      +3
      20 September 2013 14: 52
      Quote: vladsolo56
      All normal economists and politicians in Russia have already spoken about this many times, and whoever listens to them, Uncle Sam still commands our government.

      +100500 An article basically about the fact that the United States hinted that a case of something would be crushed financially, but where the "patriots" immediately yelled, "Do not frighten, besides, you have blacks hanging!" And there was a discussion that this is all a bluff. I remember when the mattress covers collapsed the price of oil, kirdyk did not come to them, but to the economy of the USSR.
      I don’t understand how you can be independent of someone while holding money (both yours and state's) in his pocket? The volume of our reserves is not so large as to scare amers by withdrawing these reserves to the yuan, for example.
      Moreover, in addition to finance, the so-called "elite" keeps there (abroad) their most intimate - children. It seems that his daughter himself is not in the country where he is for the president. But tell me, if God forbid the time "H" comes, will he press the button? Or a pact with amers-Europe is not bombed ?!
      Quote: vladsolo56
      cons from those who unlimitedly believe, beloved, respected, dear, etc.

      Moreover, judging by the latest news and after 18, we will believe recourse .
      PS And Vasilyeva's house arrest was extended in a 13-room "shack" until November 23 ..... Let the infection hang itself out of boredom at least once the power is impotent ...
      1. 0
        21 September 2013 20: 57
        Eugeniy_369 RU Yesterday, 14:52 p.m. ↑ I remember when the mattresses fell off the price of oil, kirdyk did not come to them, but to the economy of the USSR.
        The economy of the USSR was stronger than the Russian economy and was not so dependent on "oil dollars". And it (the economy) was destroyed by the stupid management of the then "elite".
        I don’t understand how you can be independent of someone while holding money (both yours and state's) in his pocket?
        Russia, and the BRICS are also slowly moving away from dependence on the dollar.
        The volume of our reserves is not so large as to scare amers by withdrawing these reserves to the yuan, for example.
        America certainly will not collapse, but the more others go away from the dollar, the faster it will learn to live within our means.
        Moreover, in addition to finance, the so-called "elite" keeps there (abroad) their most intimate - children. It seems that his daughter himself is not in the country where he is for the president. But tell me, if God forbid the time "H" comes, will he press the button? Or a pact with amers-Europe is not bombed ?!
        Unfortunately, we have in the government both corrupt and thieves, as elsewhere in the country. But personally, I believe and support the president and doubt that he can be blackmailed by anything. At the beginning of the 2000s, some tried to do this, and where did these people we all know very well.
  7. +3
    20 September 2013 08: 40
    Moreover, the American strike will be brutal, because VTB, VEB and Gazprombank, comrade Boldyrev notes, operate mainly with currency, and all dollar transactions go through payment centers in the USA.

    If so, then this is very stupid. But I do not think this statement is true.
    1. vladsolo56
      +2
      20 September 2013 08: 47
      Who do you think is more informed on economic issues, you or Boldyrev? what you think is only your opinion, Boldyrev relies on real data and knowledge on economic issues.
      1. +7
        20 September 2013 10: 29
        Quote: vladsolo56
        What do you think, who is more informed in economic matters, you or Boldyrev?

        This, alas, is unknown.
        Quote: vladsolo56
        what you think is just your opinion

        And what Boldyrev believes is only Boldyrev’s opinion
        Quote: vladsolo56
        Boldyrev relies on real data

        How, excuse me, do you know what Boldyrev relies on? Boldyrev is a publicist, first of all, and a politician.
        Quote: vladsolo56
        and knowledge of economic issues.

        A man who studied as an engineer and sociologist, but defended his Ph.D. in economics? Everything is possible...
        And now - briefly about the main thing.
        Never and under no circumstances do all dollar transactions go through and cannot go through some mythical US cash centers. Generally speaking, dollar transactions have nothing to do with US clearing centers. A dollar is just a currency and the sale and purchase transactions of the latter, as well as currency transactions are completed where it is convenient for the parties to the transaction. For example, I’m quite calmly conducting foreign exchange operations on the territory of the Russian Federation and America has nothing to do with it.
        Another question is that the same VTB may have a certain operator in the United States - a bank branch or just an affiliate that represents VTB's interests in the US financial markets. And HIS assets, yes, can be frozen. But if only VTB SPECIALLY did not drag their calculations to the United States (which is extremely doubtful because it smells like uniform idiocy), then the volumes of these acts are relatively small.
        There is still the option of freezing the funds that are provided by VTB by American banks (in fact, VTB lending), but in this case, the United States heats up first of all, freezing its own American funds. It’s easier not to provide them, and that’s all.
        Well, finally, if our banks have seriously invested in the US economy, these funds can also be frozen and withdrawn. But this has nothing to do with the announced Boldyrev dollar operations.
        1. vladsolo56
          -1
          20 September 2013 10: 46
          well, if you consider yourself more knowledgeable, and smarter than Boldyrev precisely in economic matters, this is your right, but personally I trust him more, and not only him.
          1. +2
            20 September 2013 11: 03
            If you consider Myself and this very comrade Boldyrev more competent than the professor, chief researcher at the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences Nikita Krichevsky, then I just don’t know what to think about you. hi
            You apparently just found a suitable opinion, which is pushing through as the truth you desire.
            Let's not rush to conclusions, but wait for the actions of the powerful and see ...
            Ultimately, neither this Boldyrev of yours, nor that professor Krichevsky, do not see and do not know the fullness of the levers of political and economic influence of the USA and the Russian Federation. and therefore can not give an objective assessment.
            Just suggest.
            1. vladsolo56
              -1
              20 September 2013 11: 13
              Those. are you a professor Congratulations! If your professors are like Gaidar, Chubais, etc. then you can believe them, these are just your people. Success with such professors will go far.
              1. +3
                20 September 2013 11: 17
                laughing Forgive generously, but you are talking nonsense!
                By the way, Boldyrev is not your brother? not swat? You somehow suspiciously firmly accepted his point of view, and the rest are insignificants ... Hmm ..
                All this is sad ...

                And yes, I am not a professor and do not pretend. I just call for a comprehensive look at the situation and simply demand that you do not spread alarmist moods among people. The dumping of deposits of the mentioned banks by depositors can lead to serious consequences ... Even more serious than US threats.
                Think with your head ... at least periodically and report to your irresponsible actions without owning the completeness of information fool
                Personally, you can prepare at least for the end of the world, but you do not need to duplicate your mistakes, based only on the words of one person, without putting the words of another person in anything.
                1. vladsolo56
                  -1
                  20 September 2013 12: 09
                  Why, then, to one person, maybe you don’t know, but there are still professors such as M. Musin, and S. S. Gubanov. I also believe them, but I recommend you to be simply more modest in assessing the mental abilities of strangers to you. Although you may have megalomania, then you are excusable
                  1. +1
                    20 September 2013 15: 22
                    Quote: vladsolo56
                    I recommend that you just be more modest in assessing the mental abilities of strangers to you.

                    Who would say damn it, huh? laughing
                    Be easier ..
                    You are one expert in the true situation, but we all came to stand up.
                    1. vladsolo56
                      0
                      21 September 2013 07: 54
                      You need to be simpler, for example, watch this video and do not fool people
                      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q7iZWzrP3xA
            2. Eugeniy_369
              +1
              20 September 2013 15: 11
              Quote: We refund_SSSR
              Ultimately, neither this Boldyrev of yours, nor that professor Krichevsky, do not see and do not know the fullness of the levers of political and economic influence of the USA and the Russian Federation. and therefore can not give an objective assessment.
              Just suggest.

              You can’t say more precisely.
          2. +2
            20 September 2013 11: 30
            Quote: vladsolo56
            but personally, I trust him more

            You can trust anyone, this is your personal right and I will not encroach on him.
            But personally, I prefer to check wink
      2. Eugeniy_369
        -1
        20 September 2013 15: 10
        Quote: vladsolo56
        Who do you think is more informed on economic issues, you or Boldyrev? what you think is just your opinion

        Under the nickname "Return_SSSR" Karl Marx with "Capital" is probably hiding? Here just now, one worker of the police trade union taught the academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences quantum theory ... it's like from this opera.
    2. +12
      20 September 2013 09: 54
      And you are right ... and not right. Direct calculations can be transferred within a few hours. In the world there are enough non-American banks that will never give up profits. Here's the question ... American banks have free money. To receive 80 billions a month into accounts, they don’t need any economy at all, the Fed gives them all this for nothing. What else is needed, they arbitrarily draw in any required volume. Technically, there are no restrictions; in fact, the Fed’s emission serves only as an explanation of where countless billions suddenly reappeared. And how many drew ....
      Therefore, money from American banks is the cheapest in the world. Well, they do not cost anything at all, although a cent of profit per million should be assigned to the Chase Manhattan Bank anyway. Therefore, our banks will instantly feel the loss, we don’t draw money, and the Chinese do not draw, and no one, because inflation simply limits the draftsman. And the dollar is more difficult ...
      And one more moment. Our banks bought all kinds of things in America. How not to buy when profit shines? And all this will be instantly put in an extremely difficult position. Losses will be great.
      In my opinion, Mr. Boldyrev (as it should be for our modern "expert") powerfully confuses God's gift with fried eggs. That is, he means that they will refuse to use the centers of international settlements themselves. He is completely stupid .... This will mean the US abandonment of the part of the real economy of the planet, from which it shears unfounded rent. This will instantly lead to the collapse of the American settlement system in general. Only the confidence in its reliability makes the whole world work through it. One hint that the settlement system could be dealt a political blow ...
      The world will instantly rush to go into alternative systems, which really do not exist. In particular, all holders of gold certificates will present them for gold. Given that this gold is framed each gram at the same time into hundreds of different, unsuspecting people and companies ... And this is not all.
      1. Denis_Russia
        +2
        20 September 2013 10: 04
        I absolutely agree with Mikhail3 !!!
        +100
        a lot of experts divorced !!!
        1. vladsolo56
          0
          20 September 2013 10: 51
          If Boldyrev is not an expert, then call an expert, but not yourself, of course, not Michael
          1. 0
            21 September 2013 21: 08
            If Boldyrev is not an expert, then call an expert, but not yourself, of course, not Michael
            Boldyrev is also a politician smile And when he speaks out, you always need to think what is more in his statements: policy or unbiased analysis. hi
      2. +1
        20 September 2013 10: 31
        Quote: Mikhail3
        and my opinion, Mr. Boldyrev (as it should be for our modern "expert") powerfully confuses God's gift with scrambled eggs. That is, he means that they will refuse to use the centers of international settlements themselves.

        It is doubtful :))) we are talking about the United States, and not about the whole world :)
      3. vladsolo56
        0
        20 September 2013 10: 50
        The world has long been trying to switch to reserve currencies, and so what? who allowed them that? in words, everything is simple. However, why neither China nor Russia dared to turn their backs on the dollar. So Russia is firmly sitting on the dollar and is not going to crawl.
  8. +1
    20 September 2013 08: 53
    I agree with many, this is just a concussion of the fists. For the sake of Syria, they will not climb into the financial crisis. Their economy is already lame, and even with the seizure of accounts, they will prostrate themselves. We will also fall, but we will not get used to it, but a democratic Western society will have a hard time.
    1. 0
      20 September 2013 15: 09
      Nonsense! It will be hard not for any community out there that is firmly enough on its feet, but for our very real sector of the economy, including defense industry enterprises
  9. +5
    20 September 2013 08: 56
    It is hoped that such threats will force our government to force measures to untie our economy from green cut paper. And other states will seriously consider whether it is safe to invest in the US economy.
  10. eplewke
    +7
    20 September 2013 08: 56
    An ambiguous feeling arises. Aggravation of the Cold War. Yes, dear forum users, not the beginning of the Cold War, namely the aggravation ... because it never ended. For the American government, Russia is a bone in the throat, a splinter in a soft spot. Their dream is to bury us Russians ... But break yourself! Mangols, Napoleon and Hitler survived - and survive the mattresses! It is a fact!
    1. 0
      20 September 2013 15: 13
      So far, it is the mattress covers that are experiencing us: the average life expectancy in Russia is 69,8 years, and in America 78,1. So be careful with the slogans
  11. +5
    20 September 2013 09: 08
    Dni.ru also indicates that VTB has already denied senators ’claims about Bashar al-Assad’s personal accounts. The press service of the bank said: “The statements of four US senators are the dissemination of completely unreliable information. In the VTB group there are no accounts of the leadership of Syria. We regard the words of the senators as a provocative attempt to mislead the US public. ”

    These "brave senators" do not know what to get hold of. Let them bite your ass!
    To leave Russia from the dollar, and, together with the PRC, trample this green pyramid.
  12. +4
    20 September 2013 09: 12
    "In short, a mixture of financial sanctions with the Magnitsky list."

    In short, Russia is no longer the same country, and it will not be possible to throw it on the grandmother. The Yankees received a decent answer to the "Magnitsky list", and will receive this time. After all, if anything, we can nationalize the Swiss bank Societe Generale and all other banks, or freeze their accounts, or transfer our assets frozen "over the hill" to ourselves.

    Although, on the other hand, the oligarchs have already been told a million times: "Love your Motherland, your mother!" Keep your money at home, and let them work here. It seems that the story with Cyprus has not taught them anything.
  13. clip07
    0
    20 September 2013 09: 18
    and I would have closed all the banks and the basta ..... this is a waste ....
  14. +4
    20 September 2013 09: 19
    Hello, the people of Cyprus are not enough an example quite indicative. What ratings and respect from the enlightened Western banking community "devour the weak and if he is not very weak create the prerequisites for this" is the main principle by which the economy of advanced gay Europeans and crazy people lives. Who does not know crazy is the North American United States, the full name of this entity. By the way, from what I have read, amers owns the most interesting system of power when any obligation taken by the previous administration can always be rejected with the motivation of that team's obligations somewhere like that.
  15. 8NEO8
    +4
    20 September 2013 09: 23
    The four have already developed a proposal: the US Treasury Department should freeze the assets of Russian banks in the United States, ban their activities on American territory and impose restrictions on foreign travel of employees.

    In short, a mixture of financial sanctions with the "Magnitsky list."


    And let it freeze, maybe it will finally break through our "frostbitten Ilyta" and they will stop keeping money offshore. And maybe they will even take up the reform of the Central Bank, it's time already ...
    1. Piterkras
      0
      20 September 2013 12: 28
      And who will allow them? The US Fed will not allow it. And the assets and bank accounts in the West were created in order to force the powerful and the elite to do what the West needs. Well, it’s not worth investing in the banking system of the Russian Federation, which is not worth breaking up if you look at the Cyprus results.
  16. +5
    20 September 2013 09: 25
    The worst thing is that the Central Bank of the Russian Federation will be dependent on the dollar until the constitution is changed. And no one gives this.
    1. +3
      20 September 2013 10: 55
      The bill is pending. Resists (DG), but will accept. It will not work to be silent. a lot of people are monitoring. To vote against, like to hang a tag around your neck "enemy of the people" So. that they will slow down - but everything will be good
      1. Piterkras
        0
        20 September 2013 12: 29
        Are you ready for the new Iron Curtain and the next monetary problems of the late 80s that the West will inevitably impose?
      2. SunSanBel2003
        0
        22 September 2013 00: 21
        Do you really believe in fairy tales, that the Duma does not let something through, what the Kremlin brings to it? Yes, the Duma does everything that Putin wants, it does everything: it approved Nabiulina, Golikova, made the Central Bank a mega-regulator under Nabiullina, ratified the WTO (it was introduced under President Putin and he campaigned for him), the Federal Financial Agency in the first reading adopted, the "budget rule" (7% to the Reserve Fund) was accepted, the RAS was buried ...
        You, perhaps, also in a fairy tale that the president at us type as the notary only signs laws believe?
  17. 0
    20 September 2013 09: 26
    Let's scare your foolish ones, thereby you will once again show the whole world that any financial relations with the United States and the Dolar make other countries dependent and vulnerable. Thereby, you will accelerate the rejection of green trash and accelerate your destruction.
  18. chushoj
    +2
    20 September 2013 09: 33
    From everything, I realized that either the United States no longer needs the dollar, or the United States will merge the Eurozone.
    1. +4
      20 September 2013 09: 52
      The US is acting against everyone. And the EU has been merging for a long time. This was manifested by the spread of the EU during the 2008 crisis by the US rating agencies, and the story of NSA espionage, and the "wise" migration policy that came from somewhere in the heads of the European authorities ...
    2. 0
      21 September 2013 21: 17
      chushoj Yesterday, 09:33

      From everything, I realized that either the United States no longer needs the dollar, or the United States will merge the Eurozone.
      The United States will always "merge" everyone who is not with them, not with the dollar, who has an opinion different from the American one. America is built and stands on this, on its exclusivity in the world.
  19. pa_nik
    +3
    20 September 2013 09: 38
    You still have accounts in our banks, then we will go to you!
  20. 0
    20 September 2013 09: 41
    Otso ... si, America.
    1. -2
      20 September 2013 15: 18
      Not a fright. All the same ots ... si.
      1. 0
        20 September 2013 20: 22
        McCain, did you crawl here as well? No fright ...
  21. +4
    20 September 2013 09: 41
    Thanks to Jacob Lew for the revelation. Maybe ours will become smarter and will keep money in rubles and at home .... otherwise an excellent thread for which the states can pull our bureaucratic puppets
  22. +3
    20 September 2013 09: 43
    Thanks Oleg!
    Quote: Mart
    Well, let us add from ourselves, there is every reason to assert that John Cornyn and K will not leave their anti-Russian and anti-Syrian inclinations ...
    Who would doubt that. And since they do not have to hold fantasies in these matters, it is necessary to carefully analyze all the possible actions of America in this direction. What would then not be excruciatingly painful ...
  23. +2
    20 September 2013 09: 49
    I will say this: there is a silver lining. All such hostile steps will force Russia to get out of such dangers, which will further strengthen its sovereignty. It's like a shot for immunization, i.e. all these "petty mischiefs" of the United States will not be able to destroy Russia, but they force it to fight the implanted infection and develop sovereignty. What does not kill, then temper. The US itself is used to being an attacker, not a defender. And when they themselves are touched by such internal or external threats, then for them it can be destructive.
  24. +1
    20 September 2013 10: 02
    But who are they these senators. They are not called by anyone. The US government is dependent on the bourgeoisie, or on business. If they freeze, the bourgeoisie will lose significant profit. Russia is not Mongolia, it’s not one million dollars to freeze. And then the Amer’s money invested not too little in Russia. So the bourgeoisie will send these senators far, far.
  25. +2
    20 September 2013 10: 15
    Zaeali these s live do not give peace and quiet.
    What can be done to raise the troubles in the USA, to play on the emotions of Indians or to remind Negroes how their fathers were traded and humiliated, do you need to rid the authorities of freemasons, have any ideas? Or fucking in the USA with everything that is, destroy the great shaitan God will reward for it!
  26. +2
    20 September 2013 10: 16
    Firstly, by freezing their accounts they will lose the correspondent remuneration that the United States receives for EVERY dollar operation in the world (in fact, doing nothing, but receiving, in addition to obvious profits, information about all world trade). And not a single capitalist wants to lose profits and information.
    Secondly: Russia, in turn, has "in its hands" the US government debt securities, and the demand for redemption in the conditions of their huge external debt and the state budget deficit is a very unpleasant thing.
    Thirdly: even a hint of financial blackmail will stimulate the development of alternative schemes, for example through EUR or CNY.
    Fourth: any tension in relations can provoke a new "cold war", and no one needs this, it is more profitable to trade than to fight.
    In short, these mysters are shaking the empty air, no one will allow them to be bullshit.
  27. 0
    20 September 2013 10: 47
    Russian foreign exchange reserves are held in US banks. At the same time, 60% of assets are invested in securities. Do our bankers really have no leverage over the Americans, having huge deposits in Western banks (more than 500 billion dollars)? Maybe there is. And if events develop in an unfavorable direction, Russian banks should say their good word.
    1. +2
      20 September 2013 10: 58
      In the Central Bank of Russia, where two thirds of the gold and foreign exchange reserves of the Russian Federation are located. The area of ​​the Central Bank of the Central Bank on Pravda Street in Moscow is 17 thousand square meters, the storage area is 1,5 thousand square meters. A standard gold bar in a vault has a weight of 10 to 14 kilograms, a measured bar is from 100 grams to 1 kilogram. Basically, Russia's gold reserves are stored in standard bullion.
      I want to see how the pasties from the Washington Regional Committee freeze them.
  28. +1
    20 September 2013 10: 48
    That's fine!
    It will be an excellent occasion to nationalize the Central Bank of the Russian Federation and trade energy resources exclusively in rubles.
  29. 0
    20 September 2013 10: 48
    The senators decided to raise their ratings. They won’t go further than an empty talk. Thanks to the financiers, they will quickly explain what’s why and why. America needs a war, not a victory in the war. And the war needs to be financed from both sides of the front line. And they shut up. If this measure was needed, it would have been used for a long time. Although politicians have mattresses and puppets, analysts of their puppeteers are far from fools. Unfortunately.
  30. +3
    20 September 2013 10: 56
    Glory to Kudrin, a militant Washington [I wanted to insert an indecent word, instead of a decent one, a real European]. Such as Kudrin used to be sentenced to death - for undermining the state. soldier
  31. +1
    20 September 2013 11: 02
    But such blathering should serve as a reason for transferring foreign exchange reserves to gold. And then gold in these reserves is 10-12 percent, everything else is virtual paper of the US Federal Reserve. And the sooner the better. Enough to support the economy of a potential adversary, it's time to think about your own.
  32. +2
    20 September 2013 11: 11
    If the United States does this, signs a death sentence for itself, China will see how "honestly" the Americans are doing business and what will happen if the interests of China affect the interests of the United States, money will start fleeing from American banks, following China, the whole world will do the same and pi ;% a USA
    1. chushoj
      +1
      20 September 2013 11: 28
      The United States has already signed itself a verdict that it does not want to attack Syria by any means. And it's time for Iran. Apparently, the United States will now blame, along with Abama, for the collapse of the dollar. The "violinist" is no longer needed. At the expense of China, it is more difficult here. China rasmuslimitsya anyone within a month, it is an extremely friendly and united country. But the Germans wanted to concentrate their gold in Germany, and so far it has not been possible. China can "lower" the US more elegantly. The dollar and the euro are tied tightly to the price of goods in the euro area. I think that the world community will move there.
  33. 0
    20 September 2013 11: 13
    LOTS OF LETTER

    Richard Blumenthal:
    Blumenthal was born in Brooklyn, New York, the son of Jane M. (née Rosenstock) and Martin A. Blumenthal, who was the president of a commodities trading firm. [4] [10] [11] His mother was born in Omaha, Nebraska, to a Jewish family that originated in Prussia and Baden, and his father was a Jewish immigrant from Frankfurt, Germany.
    It's clear here

    John Cornin
    Gene Shahin
    Jeanne Shaheen (born Cynthia Jeanne Bowers; January 28, 1947)
    Shaheen was born Cynthia Jeanne Bowers in Saint Charles, Missouri, the daughter of Belle E. and Ivan E. Bowers. [2]
    She is the wife of Lebanese-American attorney and political operative Bill Shaheen.
    Here you can see legs growing from Lebanon.


    Cornyn was born in Houston, the son of Atholene Gale Cornyn (née Danley) and John Cornyn II, a colonel in the US Air Force. [4] He attended the American School in Japan while growing up when his family moved to Tokyo. [5] He graduated from Trinity University in 1973, where he majored in journalism and was a member of Chi Delta Tau. [6] [7] He earned a JD from St. Mary's University School of Law in 1977 and an LL.M. from the University of Virginia School of Law in 1995. [8] [9]
    He served in San Antonio for six years as a district judge before being elected as a Republican in 1990 to the Texas Supreme Court, on which he served for seven years.
    From journalists to lawyers ... well, there’s a direct road to the fighters for world crap.

    Kelly Ayotte
    Ayotte was born in Nashua, New Hampshire on June 27, 1968, the daughter of Kathleen M. (née Sullivan) and Marc Frederick Ayotte. She attended Nashua High School. She received a BA from Pennsylvania State University in political science. While a student at Penn State, Ayotte was initiated into the Delta Gamma women's fraternity. [7] In 1993, Ayotte graduated from Villanova University School of Law, where she had served as editor of the Environmental Law Journal. [8]
    Ayotte clerked for Sherman D. Horton, associate justice of the New Hampshire Supreme Court, for one year. From 1994 to 1998, she was an associate at the Manchester law firm of McLane, Graf, Raulerson & Middleton. [9] In 1998, she joined the office of the New Hampshire Attorney General as a prosecutor. In 2003, Ayotte became legal counsel to Governor Craig Benson. Three months later, she returned to the attorney general's office as deputy attorney general. [10] In June 2004, Ayotte was appointed attorney general of the State of New Hampshire by Governor Craig Benson following Peter Heed's resignation. [11]
    Like Sahin from NewHampshire - (see this is the most caring state for shit democracy)
    career is just mighty - a year as a clerk at an assistant judge => 4 years in a private eridic office => 7 years as a assistant to the Attorney General of the State => 3 months as a Legal Advisor at the Governor => Again to the Attorney General AND ABOUT MIRACLE - IT'S ALREADY a Senator.


    In general, it’s funny - all these organisms were in all kinds of societies like LAMBDA-CAPA. Looks like forged cadres of the world gendarmerie.

    Taken from - http://en.wikipedia.org
    1. +2
      20 September 2013 12: 11
      Quote: Pharao7766
      career is just mighty - a year as a clerk at an assistant judge => 4 years in a private eridic office => 7 years as a assistant to the Attorney General of the State => 3 months as a Legal Advisor at the Governor => Again to the Attorney General AND ABOUT MIRACLE - IT'S ALREADY a Senator.


      Kerry ate more quickly: http://topwar.ru/33142-patologicheskiy-lzhec-iz-gosdepa.html. hi
    2. Eugeniy_369
      +1
      20 September 2013 15: 31
      Quote: Pharao7766
      career is just mighty - a year as a clerk at an assistant judge => 4 years in a private eridic office => 7 years as a assistant to the Attorney General of the State => 3 months as a Legal Advisor at the Governor => Again to the Attorney General AND ABOUT MIRACLE - IT'S ALREADY a Senator.

      Ruslan Usmanovich Gattarov
      Born 09.01.1977/XNUMX/XNUMX
      Position: Member of the Federation Council
      At 36 years old and IT is already a senator .... and even extinguishes fires .... Yes
      But generally funny .....
  34. +2
    20 September 2013 11: 23
    Why hysteria about some letter, even senators. The real "puppeteers" have not yet recovered from P.'s peace initiatives. And these are convulsive maneuvers, nothing more. Otherwise, it's not "to spite mom ears", and a meter lower.

    Another question for our analysts (Boldyrev). Why compare the Kremlin's internal policy with the external one, and with the RAS in particular. Let, for a start, answer the question: "Why haven't the Eastern branches of the Russian Academy of Sciences come under the" press? "

    Economics is not a double-edged sword. Even grandfather Marx did not fully understand its "ends". And where that comes out - not a "senatorial" mind business.

    And the banks will agree. Our banks have completed the official part. Raven crow ... not all peck.
    1. SunSanBel2003
      0
      22 September 2013 00: 35
      1) There is no domestic policy that directly contradicts the foreign policy (or rather, what it is being served. Somewhere there is a catch ((
      2) About the eastern branches of the RAS.
      Here, read on the RAS website the official appeal to Putin and Co. of the leaders of these eastern departments of September 16.
      http://www.ras.ru/news/shownews.aspx?id=94450405-9a52-4b19-b8ad-0c539fabacf9#con
      tent
      And the fact that they are now left, as it were, but in the form of budget organizations subordinate to Academservice, is just a little slow down their collapse.
  35. +2
    20 September 2013 11: 24
    let them freeze, - we have another reason to trample the path to the alternative currency (BRICS) and conduct part of the sales directly for the same yuan, bypassing the bank of New York
    they lose control over the information from the source of trade transactions. Well, the loss of any copecks in the form of a bank commission
  36. +1
    20 September 2013 11: 30
    on the one hand, the creeps of various senators syshya is clear: yet another attempt to annoy Russia. But on the other hand, they are pushing us to become the path to further gaining our own sovereignty.
    If our specific accounts are frozen by the Fed, this will give an additional impetus to the development of our banking system and further abstraction from the dollar, which in the end will still give us a definite plus. The whole empire of Syshya is built on dollar dependence and the more countries begin to conduct their transactions in nat. currency, the stronger will be a blow to syshya. China and the Russian Federation have already switched to settlements in their currencies, which caused rabies from the Yankees.
    Here's an interesting video on the dollar:
  37. Peaceful military
    0
    20 September 2013 11: 38
    So much for globalization, which is actually Pax Americana, or rather economic fascism. sad
  38. +1
    20 September 2013 11: 39
    It seems that the Americans have no weak points !!!
    The judge on how our diplomats stepped up in the geopolitical arena, feels my heart felt for our so many weak spots, that this rotting country in the moral and moral sense will hardly seem fellow
  39. CCA
    CCA
    +3
    20 September 2013 11: 53
    They are spinning like a snake in a pan, on which side is still pinching Russia ... I can’t bite anymore ...
  40. +2
    20 September 2013 11: 58
    But I’m wondering who benefits from supporting the US economy in our country? Why can’t I make all or most of my payments in my currency? Why can’t I withdraw my country's reserve fund from the US? And finally, why don't the BRIC countries make their calculations in their own currency, well and how to continue the topic in general to introduce a single currency for your community? After all, the total population in these countries is a little more than 3 billion people, and this is not an unimportant fact.
    1. +1
      20 September 2013 12: 42
      Think carefully yourself. Will they give us back the reserve fund of our country? Consider the reserve fund we have already given them. Nobody will ever give it back. Why? All because wink
  41. +1
    20 September 2013 12: 02
    This is the result of the financial policy of yet another traitor of RUSSIA
    KUDRINA against his wall until he ran away to the masters in the USA.
  42. +1
    20 September 2013 12: 04
    Let them freeze, at first it will be difficult, but after all, when it is necessary to get off the American financial hook. If they declare an economic war on Russia in this way, then they must respond in the same way, freeze their assets, confiscate their property on the territory of the Russian Federation.
  43. 0
    20 September 2013 13: 15
    Yuri Boldyrev is a liberal doctor. Why do we smart people listen to him?
  44. +1
    20 September 2013 13: 25
    As usual, the whole question is the will and perseverance of the leadership.
    Every stick has two ends, and the Americans know that too.
  45. tooth46
    +1
    20 September 2013 14: 15
    Article plus. Our financiers play out. The lever of influence against us is not very weak. If the states trample into nonsense, they will easily freeze the assets of our banks and other funds placed in the US financial system. The song about the need to slowly withdraw Russian funds from the USA has been going on for ten years. Woz and now there. Cheating?
  46. EGORKA
    +2
    20 September 2013 14: 38
    Iran lives with sanctions, has not died. And just like that, on a thought up, even a sash will not do such a thing, these measures will not kill Russia, Iran lives under sanctions, and Russian-American relations will break in this case. Plus, everyone will see that states cannot be trusted. And the opinions of our liberal experts are more like horror stories in unison with senators whose idol Zhirinovsky, who likes to shout something like that) IMHO
  47. +1
    20 September 2013 14: 38
    Yes, only the deceitful, venal politicians of the United States can talk. They will neither do anything nor impose any sanctions. All this is bullshit. And you, dear readers, have arranged a circus here. These pasties from the Washington Regional Committee imposed sanctions against Iran, North Korea, Syria, and that if they cannot cope with such countries, then Russia is like a flight to another galaxy for them. Believe it or not, the United States is the most vulnerable financial system in the world. It is enough to start withdrawing money from the USA anywhere and a collapse for the whole of America. They say little about this and certainly write little, but some bad people have already tried to do this 2 times. "Fed are printing bucks" how much they write and talk about it, Duc, but how do they print bucks? You just can't print the bucks, it means you need to go through all the bureaucrats and embezzlers in the United States, give everyone a hand and get permission. In how they print bucks and print a lot, too, it is dangerous the more they print, the more inflation. "Bucks will collapse and us" EEE show me at least one idiot in the world who, after the default of the Baksik, will sell goods, raw materials or provide services for the collapsed dollar. "The ruble will collapse if the dollar collapses" how much is said about it, are you sure? With what ruble to collapse, if the Baksik is not alive. Well, in general, the era of fragmented currencies will begin, each country will pull the blanket over itself. Each country has something to offer the world, this will determine the strength of that country's currency.
  48. +1
    20 September 2013 15: 06
    Quote: OPATOP
    Quote: Ivan Tarasov
    It is enough to announce the sale of our resources exclusively for rubles.

    I agree with you. Only with a slight amendment. Not about the sale of resources should be discussed. And about the rejection of the dollar as a currency, and publicly declaring it a candy wrapper worthless. This will be a real blow to the United States.


    Do you think someone will dare to publicly announce the dollar, candy wrappers and start selling exclusively for rubles. I will answer you - there is no such person yet. And those who are now in power, the same candy wrappers and collect, as we did in childhood, inserts from the "Turbo" gum.
    1. 0
      20 September 2013 18: 58
      The whole world is FOOLED! For candy wrappers sell EVERYTHING and "EVERYTHING"! Everyone understands this very well, and humbly continue to FEED this cancerous tumor - the USA, and if suddenly someone does not want to "play" in the sandbox by their rules, they twist their hands ...
  49. EGORKA
    +1
    20 September 2013 15: 15
    China is building up muscles and is also holding money in the United States, if the states try to do something similar, then China will obviously begin withdrawing its funds from the states, so that in case of disagreements with the states, there would be no blackmail. In general, Russia and our banks will not They don’t violate laws, on the contrary, going to such states makes a mess. Breaking goes to the USA, the world is changing, and many senators in the states will never change, but I think there are fewer of them, and the rest are aware of all the consequences of this step.
  50. +2
    20 September 2013 18: 12
    Hmm, once again I am convinced of the wisdom of Stalin, it is a pity I did not manage to carry out the monetary reform of the Soviet ruble to the end ...
    If my memory serves me right, then our reserve fund is placed in American securities ...
    1. 0
      20 September 2013 18: 44
      Your memory serves you. Not only is it in "inflated", unsecured pieces of paper, but also in the USA, not in Russia.
      There is a book by Nikolai Starikov “Sherche la oil. Why is our Stabilization Fund located TAM. "
      You can see the link:
      http://maultalk.info/knigi/shershe-lya-neft-pochemu-nash-stabilizacionnyj-fond-n
      axoditsya-tam.html
      ... So everyone wants to hear an intelligible answer, why not US machines or new enterprises are bought with the money of the Russian Stabilization Fund, but US treasury bonds. It is incomprehensible to ordinary people why our money does not work for us, but for the United States ...

      I, too, always think, here is a normal person who will deposit his money for saving to his neighbor, even if they really have FRIENDLY relations? That you trust your family or yourself less than your "partner" in the skin and with the "face" of the dragon?
      On the subject:
      The Russian Stabilization Fund is our beautiful tomorrow, in which
      someone lives right now.
  51. +2
    20 September 2013 18: 38
    Senators like Cornyn and McCain should be prayed for, and the Kremlin should pay them their salaries. After their insinuations, the wave of patriotism and anti-Americanism in Russia simply begins to go off scale. Such normal, honest guys...oh, if only enemies were like that!
  52. 0
    20 September 2013 19: 19
    EGORKA RU
    China is building up its muscles and also keeping money in the United States; if the states try to do something similar, then China will obviously begin to withdraw its funds from the states, so that in case of disagreements with the states it will not face blackmail.

    Yes, the United States will immediately “feel if China starts withdrawing its funds and will immediately either “freeze” it under the pretext of, say, human rights violations or some other provocation, so you simply won’t be able to take your money “from there.”
  53. +1
    20 September 2013 20: 50
    We must take the blow. What is surprising is that the Cyprus financial crisis did not teach our bankers anything.
  54. +1
    20 September 2013 20: 54
    It’s high time to nationalize the Central Bank and undermine exports (oil, weapons and gas) only for rubles; I wonder how the Russian economy would rise in this case.
  55. Pavell
    +1
    20 September 2013 22: 23
    From the above comments, I come to the conclusion that any independent position of Russia causes a nervous itch among American politicians, who are ready to take extreme measures even at the risk of harming their economy. As for us, it is necessary to draw conclusions so that no one will bother to blackmail us at the international level, we need to change the constitution, rewrite the charter of the Central Bank, store eggs in different baskets and not trust these baskets to foxes. So whatever happens is for the better :-)
  56. 0
    21 September 2013 00: 41
    if the leadership has even a drop of brains left, it will not agree to this, this is essentially a declaration of economic war, the response may be no less harsh
  57. +1
    21 September 2013 07: 00
    In this case, it is worth introducing sanctions against the United States on the sale of titanium and aluminum, uranium and rocket engines, as well as the launch of American satellites and astronauts. I think it’s worth introducing a ban on American agricultural products, I think Onishchenko will find +100500 reasons for this. And for starters, switch to trading with other countries for rubles and gold. But I still think that these idiots will not make such a wonderful decision and will not freeze our assets.
  58. 0
    21 September 2013 14: 21
    I heard some old wisdom somewhere.
    If a debt of 100 is the problem of the debtor, if 1000 is the problem of the debtor and the creditor, but a debt of 1000000 is the problem of the creditor only.
    Especially if the debt is much greater than the value of the debtor’s property.
  59. In the reeds
    0
    21 September 2013 16: 43
    Quote: lonely
    blocking a gas pipe can be sued in an international court. What decision the court will make even now is known. Then you will have to not only open the pipelines anew, but also pay heavy fines. It’s not so simple.

    In Israel we now have a holiday - Sukkot. More than two thousand years ago, 70 cows were sacrificed in the Jerusalem Temple to atone for the sins of seventy nations of the world.
  60. 0
    21 September 2013 17: 32
    Wow. Well, I'd like to see how it all ends. Because it’s not the Russians who manage this money. And there the amers will snatch it in full from both their own and ours.
  61. SunSanBel2003
    0
    21 September 2013 23: 31
    To the debate about who Boldyrev is and whether his analysis is competent.
    1) Boldyrev is the one whose signature is on the audit by the Accounts Chamber of the scam with credit-share auctions. This is a legally verified document about the pretense (and therefore the insignificance according to our Civil Code) of the transactions of the then liberal government with the Khodorkovskys, Abramovichs, Potanins, etc. - our chance to someday return the natural resources taken from us.
    2) Boldyrev is the one who saw the dangers of the version of the PSA law lobbied by the Yablokoites and, together with the then Federation Council and Glazyev (he was in the Duma), managed not to miss it. And then from the Accounts Chamber, with the support of the then left-wing Duma, he did not allow the Chernomyrdin government’s attempt to wholesale transfer two hundred fields to PSA.
    3) Boldyrev is the one who created the Accounts Chamber, thanks to which we at least know all this now.
    4) Boldyrev, by the way, is the one who in the spring, when everyone here was choking with delight about how great we delivered the S-300 to Syria, wrote an article in the Free Press (http://svpressa.ru/politic/article/68780 /), where I strongly doubted that this was so - it painfully does not fit into everything that is done in economics, not in words, but in practice, etc. And what? Who was right? Or did Putin not inform everyone on Channel One that we delivered only individual sets to Syria, and then stopped the supply altogether?
    5) By the way, in his latest article about the Russian Academy of Sciences and Syria there is a very competent, article-by-article analysis of both the adopted law and our peace initiatives.
    There is a lot more to remember, but this will be enough.
  62. SunSanBel2003
    0
    21 September 2013 23: 48
    To the debate about who Boldyrev is and whether he is literate.
    Well, in short.
    1) Boldyrev is the one whose signature is under the audit of the notorious credit-shares auctions by the Accounts Chamber, which proved their feigned (and therefore, according to our Civil Code) insignificant nature. This is our chance to one day legally reclaim our natural resources.
    2) Boldyrev is the one who played the main role (together with the then Sovefd and Glazyev (in the Duma)) in blocking the Apple version of the PSA law. And then the Accounts Chamber, together with the left-wing Duma, did not allow Cheronomyrdin’s government to transfer a couple of hundred fields across Russia to PSA and carried out an inspection on Sakhalin. We owe the “fat” 2000s to them, and above all to Boldyrev.
    3) Boldyrev is the one who created the Accounts Chamber, thanks to which we know at least something about it.
    4) Boldyrev, by the way, is the one who in the spring, when everyone here was choking with delight about how we greatly strengthened Syria by supplying it with the S-300, wrote in Free Press (http://svpressa.ru/politic/article /68780/), about the fact that he is not ready to share these delights - real assistance to Syria (as a challenge to the States) does not fit into everything that our government is doing in the economy, etc. Well, who was right? Or didn’t Putin say on Channel One the other day that we only supplied individual components, and then suspended deliveries altogether?
    5) By the way, Boldyrev’s latest article in Free Press about the Russian Academy of Sciences and Syria is a very competent legal analysis of the adopted law. And he also laid out our peace initiatives very logically.
    There is a lot more that can be remembered, and this will be enough.
  63. 0
    23 September 2013 02: 40
    It’s high time to get rid of the dependence of the Fed and create your own system: even with China, even with Iran, even with the CIS, but your own, with a predominant package of votes!
  64. Kostya pedestrian
    0
    27 September 2013 05: 13
    I wonder what the world leader in the fight against international terrorism is doing?

    Counting pennies? Have they really come down to the size of chatter or trepidation?

    Or did he put himself in the states out of fear of his “allies” in NATO?

    Don’t forget that the rest of the Americans, like your Belarusian partners in the anti-terrorist fight, are currying favor with the fair Athena goddess like you; they won’t tolerate it, and they prefer pasta with gunpowder cartridges to noodles, rather than spears for a rainy day and Greek vinegar.

    Here I would like to suggest in a friendly manner that we need to bomb deeper than the bunkers in Afghanistan; I would take a closer look at the bunkers in Berlin or the land of the revival of the power of Hitler’s Auspanzer.

    Do you need a Russian example?

    - they’ve already been taken care of, their Legendary ODON wears advertising chevrons for the Proton Mitsubishi, and the Greeks suggested that the footballers tighten their belts so that they would probably degenerate (as funny described by Jerry Seinfeld and his team), otherwise we’ll definitely We’ll hit the 11-meter shots, right on the ten mark, and we’ll definitely become champions at the next championship.

    Not to mention the fact that their spirit is now being extorted not in cheerful Fergana, but in Nazi Latvia, if we accept the formula vodka-spirit-spirit - such Latvian riflemen are in the service of Anti-Lenin.

    But to the topic of the post - there is a very interesting article on Libra “FILIPP MITLANSKY
    THE LAST Blows of the TEUTONIAN SWORD”, there is an interesting photo of the monument, and a description of who blew up this monument. It would be better if the bandits were caught and science was studied, rather than deterring investments with anti-American behavior.

    By the way, what is very important for you, not for us. You have the All-Seeing Eye on your dollar, which has now been put in an awkward position, i.e. They laugh at the dollar, saying that the dollar doesn’t see anything, and this is “what does it mean?” This means that the green one has grown old, but the Euro and the Ukrainian hryvnia are just right. If Russia hadn’t been offended, it might have worked, but you know the Georgians love it here and there. A she-wolf with sisKami is better than seven nannies, like in Guatemala.

    PS: By the way, the Nazis blew up this monument on January 1.01.1945, XNUMX - Well, old man Kornyn, a descendant of Khrushchev with corn, you can bring down the poor dekhans in Afghanistan, but in front of the saproud terrorists you play up and terrorist attacks like Continental “pay”, or you can’t get in, already “Eye” "not the one?

    As "Bachelor Party" sings: Peace is peace, and war is 66 and SKA, and so that Dinamo has hefty Ciscio