Military Review

Putin on accusations against Damascus: "Absurd nonsense!"

147
Putin on accusations against Damascus: "Absurd nonsense!"QUESTION: Vladimir Vladimirovich, you have been on a working trip for almost a week now - Siberia and the Far East. Is it caused by difficult weather conditions and their consequences or something else?


VLADIMIR PUTIN: This is primarily due to the great significance of Siberia and the Far East for Russia.

On the whole, it was a planned trip, but, of course, after the well-known severe events related to floods started, with floods, the configuration of this trip had to be somewhat changed and more time was given to these problems.

And I think that, of course, we did the right thing. A large number of ministers of the Government of the Russian Federation arrived here. And when people right on the ground with their own eyes see what is happening, what difficulties people face, then the necessary decisions are made easier and more balanced.

I am sure that the decisions that we have today, as a result of the three-day work here for almost the entire Government, are optimal. And you heard about these figures, they, in general, should close the main problems of citizens.

The most important thing is that all this be implemented on time, on time and with high quality.

QUESTION: You are talking about a trip to the Far East, but Syria is also very relevant now. The thing is that the day before the British parliament made a decision and voted against military intervention, and some countries, including Germany and even the NATO alliance, expressed a negative attitude about military intervention in Syria. For you, in general, it was expected - the decision of the British Parliament itself? And what do you think about this?

VLADIMIR PUTIN: Frankly, for me this is a complete surprise. I think that all of you, including me, in recent years, we have become accustomed to the fact that everything is accepted in the Western community without any special discussions - at least, it always looks like this - and in accordance with the wishes and position of the main partner, there is the United States of America.

If this time some kind of failure occurred, then, I repeat, for me it is unexpected, and moreover, I am even surprised by this position.

On the other hand, it still shows, apparently, that in Great Britain, although it is the main, main geopolitical ally of the United States in the whole world, I think, in Europe, all the more - even there are people there who are guided by national interests, common sense, value their sovereignty.

But, among other things, it is also the result of an analysis of what has happened in recent and previous years. I mean those tragic events that occurred in the Middle East region, in other countries.

And despite the stated goals, the achievement of these goals is still very problematic: I mean Afghanistan, and even more so Iraq, Libya and other countries. As for Egypt, we know what is happening there. Therefore, I think, I do not think - I am sure that people analyze the events, draw conclusions and react accordingly.

QUESTION: Vladimir Vladimirovich, please tell me, personally, how do you think, who applied the chemical weapon in Syria? And tell us about your assessment of the situation that has developed in this regard in this country.

VLADIMIR PUTIN: We have had a long discussion with our American partners on this issue. You know our position.

With regard to the possible use of weapons of mass destruction, any weapons of mass destruction, including chemical weapons, our position is consistent. We are categorical opponents, we condemn and, accordingly, if this is proved, we will take a consolidated part in the development of measures to counter such manifestations.

As for this case. As is known, the Syrian government has also appealed to the international community to inspect, as they believed, the use of chemical weapons by the militants. But this, unfortunately, was not done. The reaction was followed only after the 21-th number, after these tools were once again applied.

What is my rating? Common sense speaks for itself. Syrian government troops are attacking. In some regions, they surrounded the rebels. Under these conditions, to give a trump card to those who constantly call for external military intervention is utter utter nonsense. This does not correspond to any logic at all, and even on the day the UN observers arrive.

Therefore, I am convinced that this is nothing more than a provocation of those who want to draw other countries into the Syrian conflict, who want to get support from powerful participants in international activities, above all, of course, the United States. I have no doubt about that.

As for the position of our American colleagues, friends who claim that government forces used weapons of mass destruction, in this case chemical weapons, and say that they have such evidence, let them then present them to the UN inspectors and to the Security Council. There are no references to the fact that they have such evidence, but they are secret, they cannot be presented to anyone, they do not stand up to scrutiny.

This is simply disrespect for our partners and participants in international activities. If there is evidence, they must be presented. If they are not presented, then they are not. The reference to the fact that these are some kind of regular interceptions of some negotiations, which prove nothing, cannot be taken as the basis for making such fundamental decisions as the use of force against a sovereign state.

QUESTION: Tell me, please, lately you have had many important telephone conversations with the British Prime Minister, with the Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany, with the President of Iran. Did you have talks on Syria with US President Barack Obama? And if so, what was agreed, and if not, maybe you want to give him something right now?

VLADIMIR PUTIN: Thank you for intermediary services, for offering mediation services.

Indeed, I had talks with the German Chancellor, with the British Prime Minister, with the Prime Minister of Turkey, with the President of Iran. Of course, we also discussed this problem with the President of the United States at the G8. And, by the way, then we agreed that together we will facilitate the holding of peace talks in Geneva, this is the so-called “Geneva-2”.

And the Americans took upon themselves the obligation to bring the armed opposition to these talks. But this is a difficult process, I understand, and, apparently, they do not succeed. But lately, especially after the new accusations of the Syrian government in the use of chemical weapons, I did not have such negotiations with the President of the United States.

As for our position, it is known. What would I say? I do not even know. You know, I would first of all appeal to him not as my colleague, not as the President of the United States and the head of state, but as the Nobel Peace Prize winner. We need to remember what happened in the last decade, how many times the United States initiated the armed conflicts in different regions of the world. And did it solve at least one problem?

Afghanistan, I have already said, Iraq ... After all, there is no comfort, there is no democracy there, as our partners allegedly sought. There is no elementary civil peace and balance. All this needs to be looked at before making a decision on delivering rocket-bombing attacks, which, of course, will be followed by victims, including among civilians. Is it not possible and not necessary to think about it? Of course, convinced that necessary.

And as a colleague I would say that in the near future we will have a meeting in St. Petersburg. I hope that the President of the United States will be there among the participants, and we will certainly have the opportunity to talk in such a wide range, including with regard to the Syrian problem, again.

Of course, the G-20 is not a formalized legal body, it is a platform that cannot replace the United Nations Security Council, only it can decide on the use of force. But this is a good platform to discuss the problem. Why not take advantage of this?

Incidentally, with regard to the interests of the United States. After all, in the United States itself, pay attention to the American press, pay attention to the statements of politicians, experts, this or that military action is evaluated differently. Most analysts are now inclined to think that, for example, the action against Iraq was erroneous. But if we assume that there have been mistakes in the past, why is it now considered to be infallible?

All this should make us think about making such decisions without haste. And is it in the interests of the United States to once again destroy the international security system, the fundamental foundations of international law? Will this strengthen the international prestige of the United States of America? Hardly.

We urge how to think, before making such decisions, which clearly run counter to the opinion of the international community and destroy the entire security system and, of course, are detrimental to specific people. The fact that something needs to be done is obvious. But haste in such things can lead to results that are completely opposite to those expected.

QUESTION: Vladimir Vladimirovich, how do you think the probability of a strike by the Americans is still high? And what will Russia do if such a blow is dealt?

VLADIMIR PUTIN: Do you know what, how do I know? That you ask them. I can tell you why this is happening, why this is being discussed.

You see, this is an elementary thing for people who are involved in the course of events. The Syrian government army is advancing. The so-called rebels in a difficult position. They don’t have the weapons that government troops have: they don’t have aviation, no rocket technology, no modern missile and artillery systems.

What should be done to those who sponsor these so-called rebels, and those who are behind these sponsors? Help them militarily. How? Fill this missing niche here. It’s impossible to supply them with airplanes and rocket systems - it’s impossible to teach them. Only one way out - to strike themselves. If this happens, it would be very sad.

Originator:
http://www.kremlin.ru/
147 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. experienced
    experienced 2 September 2013 17: 52
    48
    It is logical, justified, and there are no equal in form and style of GDP.
    He is not ashamed to call things in his own words, and not to clothe them in "diplomatic" clothes. LADY tried to copy, but it turned out funny hi
    There, the rebels admitted to a Western correspondent that they "accidentally" messed with the XO, which they received from the SA
    1. Joker
      Joker 2 September 2013 19: 16
      -44 qualifying.
      Pu happy to madness, oil is more expensive because of all these events. Already wrote that in the event of an attack barrel will be 200 cu cost, this is such a jackpot for the oil industry workers and those who own it all, that the US will bomb the 100%, and the maximum will be Pu as it was said to transmit the air defense data of Syria, nothing more.
      1. Geisenberg
        Geisenberg 3 September 2013 00: 57
        15
        Quote: Joker
        Pu glad to madness, oil is getting more expensive due to all these events. Already wrote that in


        Listen to you so think that GDP owns sarin goes from zhikalkalka spray. Think in advance what you say and how you call the president of the Russian Federation.
        1. Joker
          Joker 4 September 2013 21: 06
          0
          Think about what you say and how you call the president of the Russian Federation.

          Be sure to go even a statue of Yeltsin in the ass kiss, all the same, he attached your pet, thank you so to speak.
          1. Cynic
            Cynic 5 September 2013 11: 20
            0
            Quote: Joker

            Be sure to go another statue of Yeltsin ...

            Are the moats tired?
            For six months Petrov swept the parade ground with a crowbar, and then brooms were brought into the unit. However, Petrov still continued to sweep the parade ground with a crowbar in order to confirm the rank of a harsh soldier of the old school, and in civilian life to say that the current generation has completely relaxed and have not been heroes for a long time.

            bully
      2. Siberian German
        Siberian German 3 September 2013 05: 12
        +3
        and I am pleased that he finally spoke clearly in Syria
        1. don.kryyuger
          don.kryyuger 3 September 2013 09: 53
          0
          Boltology. It would be better to not hesitate to supply air defense systems, no matter what kind of war itself would not begin.
      3. LaGlobal
        LaGlobal 3 September 2013 07: 51
        +5
        Quote: Joker
        Pu glad to madness, oil is getting more expensive due to all these events


        - Joker, no matter how you treat comrade V.V. Putin, he is our president, who should be respected! At least in order not to call him "Pu", etc.
        I think you will not really like it when they begin to distort your name!

        PS Glory to Putin, he's done!
        1. Vadivak
          Vadivak 3 September 2013 08: 41
          +1
          Quote: LaGlobal
          PS Glory to Putin, he's done!


          Putin is not Glory, he is Vladimir.
        2. Joker
          Joker 4 September 2013 21: 10
          0
          - Joker, no matter how you treat comrade V.V. Putin, he is, our president, who is worth respecting!

          Yeltsin Ball is such a president, Gorbachev laughing
          As I want to call it so, my personal business, thank Poo, I don’t intend to shout, I’m not a slave to glorify the one who wipes his feet on the people. And you shout louder, maybe yell something. We’ll see how Pu responds when the US bombes Syria, I’m sure he will not do anything with 1000000000%.
      4. Cynic
        Cynic 3 September 2013 15: 38
        0
        Quote: Joker
        Pu glad to madness, oil is getting more expensive due to all these events. We already wrote that in case of an attack, the barrel will be 200 cu cost,

        Personal accounts with GDP?
        Quote: Joker
        no more.

        Offering a new world war give a damn ?

        I’ll kill everyone, I’ll stay
      5. slavik_gross
        slavik_gross 3 September 2013 16: 31
        0
        For Russia, expensive oil is the same disaster as cheap ...!
    2. Vadivak
      Vadivak 2 September 2013 19: 51
      +5
      Quote: seasoned
      He is not ashamed to call things in his own words, and not to clothe them in "diplomatic" clothes.


      Do not be shy. He speaks correctly. But....

      Quote: Journalist
      And what will Russia do if such a blow is inflicted?


      Quote: Putin V.V.
      If this happens, it would be extremely sad.


      All the same is true. Sadly, what will you do? I'm going to cry
      1. Tersky
        Tersky 2 September 2013 20: 44
        +2
        Quote: Vadivak
        Quote: Putin VV If this happens, it would be extremely sad.

        Well, there is something to be sad about, the ratio of Syria to the "der @ mocrats" is far from Akhov's ... After the emergence of information about the large-scale use of chemical weapons by the Syrian government in the vicinity of Damascus, the West openly started talking about possible interference in the conflict. We invite you to learn more about who can be part of a military group, and what military forces are available to potential interventionists.
        http://ria.ru/infografika/20130829/959445869.html#13781396297904&message=resize&


        relto = login & action = removeClass & value = registration (clickable)
        1. S_mirnov
          S_mirnov 2 September 2013 22: 54
          +2
          In my opinion, a rare moment when the words of GDP evoke approval in me. I did not read the whole article, I'm afraid to be disappointed.
          1. S_mirnov
            S_mirnov 2 September 2013 23: 21
            -21 qualifying.
            Damn, all the same I started reading, Well, why the heck he ran into the Far East, is he that lifeguard? Or can’t we resolve the situation without the president’s president, what for then officials? Doesn’t he understand that now, instead of helping the population, all officials will be preparing for the visit of Himself and arrange a show, instead of real affairs! All will be blamed by the FSO, at least a day before the visit of the GDP, all the Ministry of Internal Affairs will raise their ears! People are busy there, and then the president will come PR! It would be better if he climbed the Dzhomolungma, save tigers, there would at least not bother anyone! fool
            1. Apollo
              Apollo 2 September 2013 23: 30
              14
              Quote: S_mirnov
              Damn, I still started reading

              and you do not read Alexander.
              Quote: S_mirnov
              Well why the heck

              but for the above word
              and below
              Quote: S_mirnov
              he popped up

              minus You
              according to the Constitution, he is the head of state.
              Quote: S_mirnov
              Is he a lifeguard?

              he is the president of the country, but where else can he be, not to sit out in his office.
              1. S_mirnov
                S_mirnov 3 September 2013 09: 46
                -2
                Quote: Apollon
                he is the president of the country, but where else can he be, not to sit out in his office.

                President of the country - must govern the country !!! And not a rescue operation. And It is from the command post, which in peacetime is the cabinet!
                And if the president dangles through an emergency, it means that he has either poor subordinates who cannot work, or a lot of free time and nothing to do.
            2. VasDA
              VasDA 3 September 2013 00: 00
              13
              I don’t agree ... Maybe the bureaucrats tensed in connection with his arrival, but the layman didn’t notice ... Seriously ... I remember many of the cones' visits to our city, and not of the first persons either ... Tin ... Probably , as elsewhere ... Now ... We realized that Putin arrived only when his limousine with a standard flew past the office ... The traffic police worked for a rarity, cordoning NO ... And certainly he didn’t bother anyone here - Ministry of Emergencies, the army and the people were not up to him.
              Maybe in Primorye it was different, I don’t know.
              By the way ... I don’t know if it was through the central channels. In the light of this article.
              Conducting a meeting in the Jewish Autonomous Okrug and evaluating the work of the deployed tent camps, he issued the following: "What are you feeding people? The children refuse to eat your gruel? Have you been there yourself? Do I need to put someone on gruel myself in order for people to eat normally? Correct!" "
              --------
              It may be exaggerated, but ... "The Tsar-Father has not forgotten us, the Izza has not forgotten us ..." (C) I think that the head of state is OBLIGED to visit the disaster areas, showing that people are not alone with their problems. Yes, it will not stop the water with a formidable roar, it will not extinguish volcanoes if there is an eruption, etc. etc. But the common people must see that they are not forgotten. Personally, I can't see him coming, but my neighbor, the elderly Lydia Sergeevna, felt better, calmer and more confident in her.
            3. igor.borov775
              igor.borov775 3 September 2013 02: 59
              10
              1. S_mirnov
                S_mirnov 3 September 2013 10: 00
                -5
                Quote: igor.borov775
                He said that it’s not easy to solve it, It’s one thing when ordinary voters talk about it and another thing when those who are going to create new enterprises and technologies raise such a question,

                Those. large owners - Abramovich and other privatizers? Yes, the president listens to them.
                Quote: igor.borov775
                So all that was written here in vain of decisions on the Economics of Agriculture by social policy, which they could not take for years decided,

                I am ashamed to ask, but who ruled us all these years until "they could not accept for years"?
                However, the theory that there is an "old Putin" and a "new Putin" is now being pushed, and the "new" is really younger, acting more decisively, but I do not see any fundamental changes in politics. as before, "They are terribly far from the people!"
              2. Ka-52
                Ka-52 3 September 2013 15: 58
                +1
                К igor.borov775otherwise Smirnov climbed in.

                I began to read, then lost my way, then read it again.
                Try to break my advice into paragraphs. And then don’t bring it together. It is very difficult to perceive, many I think will not even read. A lot of information, but at least finish one sentence and start another. Make a bunch. And then, as on the Tula roads, then the pit is a pothole.

                Best regards hi
              3. Inspector
                Inspector 3 September 2013 20: 05
                0
                Igor, punctuation would be ... It’s hard to read, you have to read the phrase twice so you don’t get it wrong.
            4. Krsk
              Krsk 3 September 2013 08: 59
              +3
              I can imagine a gang of liberal fighters struggling in ecstasy if he hadn’t gone.



              Quote: S_mirnov
              It would be better if he climbed the Dzhomolungma, save tigers, there would at least not bother anyone!



              Did the rescuers knock out bags from their hands or something? How, what and to whom did he interfere there?
              1. S_mirnov
                S_mirnov 3 September 2013 11: 06
                -2
                As a rule, if the administration is working normally, then in emergency mode it has a lot to do, and of course the Ministry of Emergencies also. The arrival of the first person is always accompanied by increased security measures, convulsive attempts by the administration to arrange a show and, as a rule, confusion, even in a normal situation.
                Moreover, I do not understand what such decisions required his personal presence? He flew there to say that in the tent towns poorly fed? No one else can solve this issue?
                Correct me if I am wrong.
          2. Geisenberg
            Geisenberg 3 September 2013 00: 58
            +4
            Quote: S_mirnov
            In my opinion, a rare moment when the words of GDP evoke approval in me. I did not read the whole article, I'm afraid to be disappointed.


            Oh well, at least something great was satisfied ...
      2. skeptic
        skeptic 3 September 2013 16: 53
        +2
        Quote: Vadivak
        Quote: Putin V.V.
        If this happens, it would be extremely sad.


        All the same is true. Sadly, what will you do? I'm going to cry


        Well, yes, well, yes, of course he had to, "like a kid", rush with all his Russian boys to defend Syria ... And it doesn't matter that the West is just waiting for Russia to be drawn into some kind of mess, playing off Islamists around the world with the Russian state.
        The way Vladimir Putin behaves has enormous political significance for the reputation of all of Russia. Not too advertised deliveries of ammunition and weapons are much more important than the introduction of the Russian Armed Forces (Russian troops in Syria - for the Muslim East - a red rag that will attract a fucking cloud of fanatics from all over the world, under the slogan "Allah Akbar", is much more than now) For the Muslim world, the war in Syria is a religious showdown inside, whoever gets in from the outside can become an enemy for everyone. On this basis, it may even lead to the unification of the warring parties. So let the USA get in on this side ...
        1. Inspector
          Inspector 3 September 2013 20: 08
          0
          I completely agree with the comment.
    3. Karabin
      Karabin 2 September 2013 22: 52
      +4
      Quote: seasoned
      He is not shy to call things in his own words,

      our American colleagues, friends,
    4. Geisenberg
      Geisenberg 3 September 2013 01: 03
      +6
      Quote: seasoned
      It is logical, justified, and there are no equal in form and style of GDP.
      He is not ashamed to call things in his own words, and not to clothe them in "diplomatic"


      He can speak. Of course. And the wording he swings. Here is a masterpiece:
      And the Americans took upon themselves the obligation to bring the armed opposition to these talks. But this is a difficult process, I understand, and, apparently, they do not succeed. But lately, especially after the new accusations of the Syrian government in the use of chemical weapons, I did not have such negotiations with the President of the United States.


      In the translation, it sounds something like this: And the Americans hung noodles on our ears, thinking that they were holding the pro-wick by the beard, and as usual they screwed up even in such a simple case, I had to stir up the chemical attack.
    5. LaGlobal
      LaGlobal 3 September 2013 07: 48
      +1
      VLADIMIR PUTIN: We have been discussing with our American partners on this issue for a long time.


      The word "partners" is like a new curse, otherwise there is no way? This word, my ear starts to cut when someone says it ..
      1. Inspector
        Inspector 3 September 2013 20: 09
        0
        But what, should he openly call his "partners" enemies? What word would you use in his place?
  2. VasDA
    VasDA 2 September 2013 17: 53
    24
    I hope that the world media will replicate the "utter nonsense" ... laughing Beckoned from the heart of Obama - the dove of peace ..
    1. dmitreach
      dmitreach 2 September 2013 18: 05
      +8
      The word "crap" has several meanings ... I wonder how the omerygunSSkie onallytags will translate Saray Obama?
      1. experienced
        experienced 2 September 2013 18: 09
        15
        Quote: dmitreach
        The word "crap" has several meanings ... I wonder how the omerygunSSkie onallytags will translate Saray Obama?

        I think that from Russian into English the combination "utter nonsense" will be translated into the version "true truth" wassat
        I recall how in the West, after Khrushchev’s words, they discussed who Kuzya was and what kind of mother he promised to show. laughing
        1. dmitreach
          dmitreach 2 September 2013 18: 22
          +4
          There is still an intriguing scenario! bully
          The World Backstage, pulling the strings of Saray Obama, in order to wind the last tail before the Summit, will translate this "opus" somehow more offensive ... In the style of: "earthworm" (Mowgli, cartoon) So that the Saray arrived at the Summit offended. Like: Vlad thinks that African habits do not let you go, Mr. President. And your decisions are in the canvas of youthful addictions ... laughing The World Backstage - it is like that, it can come up with something like that. wassat
          But in any case, the phrase - in the quotation book! I look forward to seeing Vladimir at the Summit "give a light" to the foe.
        2. escobar
          escobar 2 September 2013 22: 32
          +1
          I think similar to our exquisite phrases amers do not. There it will sound trite: Bullshit
      2. APASUS
        APASUS 2 September 2013 19: 35
        +4
        Quote: dmitreach
        I wonder how omerigunSSkie online translations translate Saray Obama?

        Сrazy сánnabis smile
    2. Alexei
      Alexei 2 September 2013 18: 13
      +4
      Quote: VasDA
      I hope that the world media will spread the "utter nonsense" ..

      I wonder how it will sound in English? And will the English-speaking brain perceive the meaning of the phrase? smile
      1. Jin
        Jin 2 September 2013 18: 56
        10
        Here I read and think. Damn, but Putin and Obama are really "colleagues", I just imagined how in the office you discuss something with colleagues at work (the head of the procurement department himself), partners (Moscow, St. Petersburg, Ekb, Orel, Nizhny, Saratov, Kirov + potential), I don't like a lot and have to look for ways - opportunities so that the interests of the company (for Putin, read Russia) do not suffer ... Here comes the understanding of the "depth of the process" of all these troopers, especially at their level, when the fate of peoples is decided. .. earlier in posts, as a rule, I took a tougher position, not in favor of negotiations ...
      2. mr.Man
        mr.Man 2 September 2013 19: 00
        +1
        Quote: Alexej
        And will the English-speaking brain perceive the meaning of the phrase?

        Hardly .., he understands only all sorts of Consensus laughing with their point of view ...
      3. sub307
        sub307 2 September 2013 22: 54
        0
        And so approximately: ulter nonsense. And, here, as the brain perceives - FIG knows.
      4. aksakal
        aksakal 2 September 2013 23: 04
        +3
        Quote: Alexej
        And will the English-speaking brain perceive the meaning of the phrase?

        - Well, "Maser of Kuzma" from Khrushchev
        Quote: Alexej
        english speaking brain

        not without difficulty, but managed to understand laughing laughing At first too; "who is Kuzma and why should we see his mother?" She will also understand this phrase, a little later, not right away, perhaps after good people laughing
    3. Reasonable, 2,3
      Reasonable, 2,3 2 September 2013 19: 05
      +1
      They decided everything for themselves, PUTIN, AND TOGETHER with him Russia-humiliate. The "gentlemen" -belogvardeitsy will not come out. Not that country already. P ..... get from our systems. BDK-just skated like that ?.
      1. Jin
        Jin 2 September 2013 19: 09
        +4
        Quote: Reasonable, 2,3
        They decided everything for themselves, PUTIN, AND TOGETHER to humiliate Russia with him.


        This they decided a long time ago, not news.

        Quote: Reasonable, 2,3
        Will not come out "gentlemen" -the White Guards


        I do not understand what the color of the army of the Russian Empire has to do with it?
  3. JIaIIoTb
    JIaIIoTb 2 September 2013 17: 53
    +7
    It is impossible for them to deliver airplanes and missile systems - it is impossible to teach them. There is only one way out - to strike by ourselves. If this happens, it would be extremely sad.

    And how then will rocket attacks on a sovereign state differ from bandits? Right, nothing!
    1. Jin
      Jin 2 September 2013 19: 17
      +4
      Quote: JIaIIoTb
      And how then will rocket attacks on a sovereign state differ from bandits? Right, nothing!


      Since the time of Serbia, they are no different ...
    2. mr.Man
      mr.Man 2 September 2013 20: 42
      +4
      Quote: JIaIIoTb
      It is impossible for them to deliver airplanes and missile systems - it is impossible to teach them.
      The state earns on deliveries (although someone will drop a percentage of what in their pocket, but most of it will remain for production ...)
      There is only one way out - to strike by ourselves. If this happens, it would be extremely sad.
      Only one way out: to make their Armed Forces such that everyone would reckon with them,
      in the meantime, we don’t even have enough forces to resist the Americans (except to erase them from the globe), not to mention NATO (the Collective Security Treaty is not even the USSR Armed Forces, but you can never stutter about the Warsaw Pact)
      So far, the realities are such that Russia cannot really protect anyone from the "shitcrats" without starting a global war of destruction.
      While Russia is operating on this .., it can send a fleet to the port to someone or an army .., but the first opening of fire from the West towards the Russian Armed Forces is fraught with global consequences for all countries (skirmishes with Aborigines and other Papuans are just local armed conflicts and the war does not pull ...)

      Russia can not protect anyone on its own (as if it were not regrettable), only by the supply of weapons, but there are pitfalls ...
      The USSR once helped left and right, but where is the money?
      Most were eventually "forgiven" or "knocked off" the payment ...
      1. igor.borov775
        igor.borov775 3 September 2013 03: 33
        0
        Yes, they forgot something, as the red-haired representative of the administration ceded the USSR debts to the Yankees, they would rip off and then we did not have such an opportunity under YELTSIN. At that time, the privilege was signed for the purchase of the Voyings, and our glorious aircraft industry went down to the joy of the Yankees, but to someone warplanes were still needed and not everything turned out so deplorably as the ankis wanted
  4. zart_arn
    zart_arn 2 September 2013 17: 54
    +2
    He should be more active in the world arena to defend Russia's position. Obama, for example, does not leave the screens. And in his own country in such trouble, God himself commanded to take a direct part.
  5. Stiletto
    Stiletto 2 September 2013 17: 55
    11
    Yes, the interview was good. When viewing it, I could not get rid of the feeling that the GDP with universal sadness knew about something so unpleasant for Obama that he was frankly sorry for this Nobel kid. Sorry, but ... We must, Fedya. It is necessary !!!
    1. dmitreach
      dmitreach 2 September 2013 18: 09
      11
      Someone Vladimir today is happy somehow in a special way ... Somehow on the first of September, sometime in poker he outplayed someone ... "He will draw a cat, a rear view", when meeting with students, then the train of thought of the overseas he will call his opponent "utter nonsense" ...
      We stock up on popcorn, for the G20 Summit will be interesting for quotes.
      1. avt
        avt 2 September 2013 18: 28
        +2
        Quote: dmitreach
        Someone Vladimir today is glad somehow in a special way ... Something like the first of September, something like poker outplayed someone ...

        Well, judging by the time of the statement, take at least the Aglitz parliamentary meeting, yes, for the time being.
      2. Anatole Klim
        Anatole Klim 2 September 2013 18: 55
        +3
        Quote: dmitreach
        "That cat, the back view will draw", when meeting with students,

        This is not a cat, this is the outgoing cat Dorofei, not for nothing that in the Far East, 2/3 of the government are working with Putin. Well, the prime minister is organizing an attack of the Khazar Khaganate on White Russia, he had no time before natural disasters.
      3. The comment was deleted.
    2. skeptic
      skeptic 3 September 2013 17: 23
      0
      Quote: Stiletto
      When viewing it, I could not get rid of the feeling that the GDP with universal sadness knew about something so unpleasant for Obama that he was frankly sorry for this Nobel kid. Sorry, but ... We must, Fedya. It is necessary !!!


      And she put the "gutta-percha boy" behind the scenes in order to transfer all the dirt that is being created now and in the future to the national ownership. Because Putin is sorry for him. The fool got into the position of Zits-chairman of the messengers of hell, and they, for a laugh, called him "the main peacemaker", so he puffs up.
  6. Sandov
    Sandov 2 September 2013 17: 55
    +2
    Up to 20 ki, apparently, the amers will not twitch much. If ours succeeds in convincing the amers of the inappropriateness of the use of force against Syria. And it would be even better to agree on a joint consolation of the situation in the region. It is unlikely that these scumbags would take such a step of course.
  7. d_trader
    d_trader 2 September 2013 17: 56
    12
    Well done Vladimir Vladimirovich. Always clear and to the point!
  8. denson06
    denson06 2 September 2013 17: 58
    +7
    Once again, over the past year, the Obama administration has received a tangible slap in the face to which it cannot find an answer. The assassination of Ambassador Stevens in Benghazi, the beating of the "Muslim brothers" in the Arab Republic of Egypt (it was on them that Barack Obama staked), and now a completely open setup with a chemical attack and an indistinct reaction to it from the West, the United States and, in particular, Obama. "Akela missed .." - humorists will say. For me, he did not miss, but from all over he spanked his foot in the very back ... laughing
    With respect.. hi
    1. Egoza
      Egoza 2 September 2013 19: 20
      +5
      Quote: denson06
      "Akela missed .." - humorists will say.

      Found someone to compare with Akela! Tobaccos he, Tobaccos running errands at the Rothschilds
      1. Inspector
        Inspector 3 September 2013 20: 16
        0
        Or the Rockefellers? Well, they are butting now - they are sharing the world, equine representatives of the herd (the word k..la does not pass censorship).
  9. svp67
    svp67 2 September 2013 18: 00
    +5
    Honestly, I'm more interested in how this trip was able to help our people in the Far East, and if help is really provided, then this is very good. In any case, our guys - the volunteers who are working there now, say that it’s much easier to work there than in other places, since the authorities really work, and do not leave the room ... although this may apply only to the area where they are work, but still good.
    1. Apollo
      Apollo 2 September 2013 18: 10
      17
      Russia will send a delegation to the US Congress to discuss Syria

      Novo-Ogaryovo. 2 September. INTERFAX.RU - Russian President Vladimir Putin supported the initiative of the Federation Council and the State Duma to send a delegation to the US Congress to negotiate the situation in Syria.
      http://interfax.ru/news.asp?id=326593

      A clear and impeccable move. good Most likely, in my opinion, the initiative belongs to Vladimir Vladimirovich himself.
      If the House of Commons worked, why not work in Congress ?!
      1. stalkerwalker
        stalkerwalker 2 September 2013 18: 22
        +4
        Quote: Apollon
        If the House of Commons worked, why not work in Congress ?!

        Oh, I'm afraid the topic will be "blabbed". They will remember the "Magnitsky Act", the law of Dima Yakovlev, Hezbollah, fighting on the side of the government. Undoubtedly, there are sane people there, but not enough of them.
        If the black leader said "We must," Congress will say "Yes!"
      2. Tersky
        Tersky 2 September 2013 20: 19
        +3
        Quote: Apollon
        If the House of Commons worked, why not work in Congress ?!

        Apollo, hi ! It may work if Congress does not decide on the use of military force against Syria before the arrival of a delegation from Russia, the time and place has already been set. WASHINGTON, September 2. / Corr. ITAR-TASS Dmitry Zlodorev. US senators will hold hearings on Tuesday and Wednesday about the possible use of military force in Syria. This was reported today on the website of the Senate Committee on Foreign Affairs. On Tuesday, the hearings will be open and will begin at 14:30 local time / 22: 30 Moscow time /. The session, scheduled for Wednesday, will be held in strict secrecy behind closed doors. The report does not specify exactly who will speak at the hearing, however, according to Reuters, US Secretary of State John Kerry and Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel will speak to the senators.http://www.itar-tass.com/c1/861646.html
      3. Suhov
        Suhov 2 September 2013 21: 39
        +5
        Quote: Apollon
        Russian President Vladimir Putin supported the initiative of the Federation Council and the State Duma send a delegation to the US Congress for negotiations on the situation in Syria.

        Will Kolya Valuev go?
        1. Vadivak
          Vadivak 2 September 2013 21: 43
          +4
          Quote: Sukhov
          Will Kolya Valuev go?


          And who will advertise?
          1. experienced
            experienced 2 September 2013 21: 46
            +3
            Quote: Vadivak
            And who will advertise?

            Since it is just a great opportunity to shoot new commercials about MTS roaming, along the way it will "force congressmen to peace", there it will not be equal to it not BP with Klitschko, you can act without looking back wassat
        2. Apollo
          Apollo 2 September 2013 22: 12
          +5
          Quote: Sukhov
          Will Kolya Valuev go?



          Nicholas must be asked. If the Motherland says yes, then he will go. At one time S. Stallone regretted meeting with Nikolai. But nevertheless, he remained alive, and now imagine for a moment what remains of Obama ?! Provided that if something remains.laughing
      4. Sandov
        Sandov 3 September 2013 00: 29
        0
        Quote: Apollon
        Russian President Vladimir Putin supported the initiative of the Federation Council and the State Duma to send a delegation to the US Congress to negotiate the situation in Syria.


        I would like to hope that something good can come of this. Well, the mind must triumph. I must agree that the truth is on the side of government troops.
    2. igor.borov775
      igor.borov775 3 September 2013 03: 48
      0
      Here, even the ICRF of the Russian Federation understands how the authorities reacted to the root, the fact is that it has just begun all the officials have been raised who pulled or dragged away for a long time, There were attempts through the court but hushed up so everything is right, Yes, and there are more good people than foams, One feature of the robberies was not noticed, although at first they made statements and then apologized, One damn thing, you can’t get any dirt because the media behave modestly, But the truth was waiting for the fried facts in my soul, but here it’s a bummer, Maybe later what will happen I don’t I believe, Everything is in plain sight at once, the people will react, it’s not the same as it was a year ago,
  10. max702
    max702 2 September 2013 18: 07
    +1
    All this is good, but what he will do in the event of strikes, he never said .. maybe the politics. And maybe you can’t say anything here .. although no, he said ..- It’s extremely sad ..
    1. Jin
      Jin 2 September 2013 19: 02
      +5
      Quote: max702
      but what he will do in the event of striking, he never said ..


      What, colleague, was he supposed to say? Let's bomb the fucking US bases in the Middle East? Wipe Tel Aviv off the face of the earth? If you want to understand a person, put yourself in his place. Do not forget that he is our Supreme and his every "crooked" statement will oblige you and me to take up arms ... I don’t want to shed blood, for so dear to me, but still little familiar and distant Assad ...
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. Artyom
        Artyom 2 September 2013 20: 41
        +4
        Watch this broadcast carefully, it contains answers to many questions that are related to Syria
        1. Sandov
          Sandov 3 September 2013 00: 46
          0
          Artyom thanks for the video +

          Rats poison Syrians, and Amers want to bomb Syrians. Amer and Wahhabis friendship, love, chewing gum.
      4. max702
        max702 2 September 2013 22: 33
        +4
        And it reminded me of what he said about the submarine Kursk
        -She drowned ...
        I don’t want to fight for Assad, but .. we seem to have a bunch of government services that are very expensive, so if the largest oil or gas terminal in Qatar or the United Arab Emirates were suddenly and completely "accidentally" burned down then .. then yes -It would be extremely sad .. very appropriate.
        1. Jin
          Jin 3 September 2013 00: 46
          0
          Quote: max702
          I don’t want to fight for Assad, but .. we seem to have a bunch of government services that are very expensive, so if the largest oil or gas terminal in Qatar or the United Arab Emirates were suddenly and completely "accidentally" burned down then .. then yes -It would be extremely sad .. very appropriate.


          I agree, a good state of emergency would not hurt smileor rather would have hurt, but not us. But this is more of a dream, unfortunately.
        2. Inspector
          Inspector 3 September 2013 20: 22
          0
          What was he supposed to say? He said "she drowned," and she didn't drown? Or, given the then weakness of the country, he should have announced the destruction of the Russian submarine? Said A and B, declare war?
  11. andrei332809
    andrei332809 2 September 2013 18: 08
    +2
    just utter nonsense.

    the dog knows how much this phrase our media will carry. no matter how much is left for domestic consumption. these words must be yelled from all the political platforms of the world, maybe then they will be heard by those to whom they are intended
  12. Gecko
    Gecko 2 September 2013 18: 09
    +4
    It’s not clear to me why our leadership is puffing up more for Kyrgyzstan and Syria than for a more painful topic for Russia as Ukraine. I would not like to fight, for example, over Syria, but for Ukraine and the West this is another matter.
    1. Apollo
      Apollo 2 September 2013 18: 14
      +5
      quote -This was a planned trip as a whole, but, of course, after the well-known difficult events connected with floods and floods began, I had to change the configuration of this trip a little and devote more time to these problems.

      infographic situation
  13. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 2 September 2013 18: 17
    +6
    Well, Putin as he says that the thread))) Now, as Obama, I see immediately "utter nonsense" I remember .. laughing
  14. Khabarov
    Khabarov 2 September 2013 18: 21
    -1
    "Our American colleagues and friends" ... Vysotsky V.S. about hockey commentators - "Why -" our Czech friends "- if they scored a goal for us"? Since when have Americans been friends with us? Bend over again. By the way, indicative news, all charges were dropped from Serdyukov. The scoundrels do not surrender their power.
    1. Alexei
      Alexei 2 September 2013 19: 13
      +5
      Quote: Khabarov
      Since when have Americans been friends of ours? Caved in again

      How was it necessary? "Our main geopolitical enemies" ... Or maybe "competitors in world domination"? Why find fault with the word? In general, these words struck me as a mother of irony.
      Quote: Khabarov
      By the way, indicative news, all charges were removed from Serdyukov. The villains in their power do not surrender.
      Yes? Well, everything, it's time to collect the uprising ... We will storm the Kremlin.
      1. Khabarov
        Khabarov 2 September 2013 20: 02
        -3
        Do not go from one extreme to another. You can just do without curtsies. And there will be no uprising with an assault - there will be a normal, spontaneous rebellion and little riots are already flickering on the news. The truth is only against the “blacks”.
    2. Jin
      Jin 2 September 2013 19: 36
      +1
      Quote: Khabarov
      "Our American colleagues and friends" ... Vysotsky V.S. about hockey commentators - "Why -" our Czech friends "- if they scored a goal for us"?


      "And the Guinean Sam Brook walked around me! To me too, you know friend, this is your Sam Brook" drinks
      1. Khabarov
        Khabarov 2 September 2013 20: 09
        0
        There were idols in our time ....
        1. Akhtuba73
          Akhtuba73 2 September 2013 23: 46
          0
          Quote: Khabarov
          There were idols in our time ....

          And there were and are ...
  15. sashka
    sashka 2 September 2013 18: 31
    +2
    Colleague, brother, partner .. Why such a sluggishness and elegance of style ... Black-ass pervert. That's all our "partners" and friends. Put on everyone and everything. and go our own way ... for us the world does not matter ..
    1. Jin
      Jin 2 September 2013 19: 25
      +1
      Quote: Sasha
      . For us, the world does not matter


      Sasha, you are not quite right, in my opinion ... For us, the world cannot but matter. For Americans, it doesn’t really matter! And where does it lead them? We are not them! And do not repeat their mistakes, in my opinion.
  16. Gecko
    Gecko 2 September 2013 18: 32
    0
    If the United States strikes at government forces, then we need to bombard militants. So the balance will be restored.
    1. Jin
      Jin 2 September 2013 19: 27
      +1
      Quote: gecko
      If the United States strikes at government forces, then we need to bombard militants.


      We will be declared the Empire of Evil once again and ... will launch missile and bomb strikes on Syria with ALREADY SUPPORT OF THE "WORLD COMMUNITY" ...
      1. Gecko
        Gecko 2 September 2013 19: 47
        +1
        Wrong country called EMPIRE OF EVIL
        1. Tersky
          Tersky 2 September 2013 20: 29
          +5
          Quote: gecko
          Wrong country called EMPIRE OF EVIL

          By the way, it’s also a mistake with Honduras wink
          1. Jin
            Jin 2 September 2013 23: 57
            0
            Quote: Tersky
            By the way, it’s also a mistake with Honduras


            Wow! laughing The error came out, however ...
        2. Jin
          Jin 2 September 2013 23: 54
          0
          Quote: gecko
          Wrong country called EMPIRE OF EVIL


          Well, this is certain! Especially considering who called)
      2. bootlegger
        bootlegger 2 September 2013 21: 20
        +1
        No.
        If we are again called the evil empire, then they will be feared, like the evil empire.
        What blows are there if the ships of the EMPIRE OF EVIL are in the bay!
        The whole problem is our predictability.
        There is no predictability, there is fear. And vice versa ...
        1. Jin
          Jin 3 September 2013 00: 00
          +1
          Quote: bootlegger
          The whole problem is our predictability.


          In my opinion, our whole problem is corruption of bureaucrats and corruption ... Hence the predictability for the West ... As the classic said?
          "Wake me up in 100 years and ask:
          What are they doing in Russia?
          - I will answer: they drink and steal ... "
          1. bootlegger
            bootlegger 3 September 2013 00: 11
            0
            That's just the point. They drink and steal everywhere.
            In more or less degree.
            Therefore, it’s easy to calculate us now.
  17. dimon-media
    dimon-media 2 September 2013 18: 39
    +1
    Obamych himself is well aware that this is "utter nonsense", since it could not have done without his go-ahead. It is in the American style to create problems and then solve them in their own favor and in their own interests to resolve the situation. If Western countries try to sort out this situation without military intervention (which the Pindos were initially interested in), then what was the need for a provocation with chemical. weapons? What are they, completely finished marasmats?
    1. dimon-media
      dimon-media 2 September 2013 18: 58
      0
      Quote: dimon-media
      If Western countries try to resolve this situation without military intervention (what pindos were originally interested in *)

      I apologize, the little one went out, I wanted to say -Not interested*
    2. VladimS
      VladimS 3 September 2013 01: 22
      0
      They simply did not foresee such a worldwide reaction to recent events. We thought that it would be as always: adobryams and join. But ordinary people and with them their parliaments understand perfectly "hu from hu"
  18. Corsair5912
    Corsair5912 2 September 2013 18: 50
    +1
    What needs to be done to those who sponsor these so-called rebels and those who are behind these sponsors? Help them militarily. How? Fill here this missing niche of their capabilities. It is impossible for them to deliver airplanes and missile systems - it is impossible to teach them. There is only one way out - to strike by ourselves. If that happens, that would be extremely sad.

    This is not sad, but the sad thing is that Syria cannot properly bounce around the cities of sponsors so that these cowardly and vile creatures experience "humanitarian missile and bomb strikes" on their own skin.
  19. Alikovo
    Alikovo 2 September 2013 18: 52
    0
    chemical weapons were blown up by Amers, Turks or Saudis.
    1. svp67
      svp67 2 September 2013 19: 19
      +2
      Quote: Alikovo
      chemical weapons were blown up by Amers, Turks or Saudis.
      And you exclude betrayal?
      1. alone
        alone 2 September 2013 20: 59
        +2
        It is not at all excluded. Remember the Iraqi generals. Who were bribed by amers. Such a big city as Baghdad was handed over in a couple of hours. It is possible that some corrupt military men could have blown up chemical weapons.
  20. Essenger
    Essenger 2 September 2013 19: 08
    +2
    It’s all violet what Putin thinks. As decided to hit Syria and so hit. The locals said that, at the suggestion of Putin, Cameron refused to hit Syria))) Bullshit of course.
    The West is slow in the blow not because the Russian Federation or China is against, but the people are really against. Yesterday I watched Secretary of State Kerry’s speech, he very carefully chose words, spoke about responsibility to history. He swore that he also did not want war and was tired of this, like the whole American people, etc. Putin's opinion is the latest that excites Kerry and Obama. And Putin’s suggestions, let's meet in G-20 and discuss this topic in general is ridiculous. Not Obama asks for a meeting with Putin, but Putin wants to meet with Obama. Draw conclusions.
    1. svp67
      svp67 2 September 2013 19: 11
      +3
      Quote: Essenger
      and the people are really against it.
      and it is also necessary to "prepare" for this. Public opinion is not taken just like that ... And for that matter, part of the people are always "Against", but also part "FOR". It's all about who the politicians want to hear.
    2. Alexei
      Alexei 2 September 2013 19: 36
      +6
      Quote: Essenger
      It’s all violet what Putin thinks.
      Believe me, everyone is more violet what you think specifically.
      Quote: Essenger
      The West is slow in the blow not because the Russian Federation or China is against, but the people are really against.
      Are you really bad? When even the people were "for"? As a thread of American military intervention, the streets are full of people with "NO WAR" posters ... And nothing, they protested and calmed down, watching beautiful films about the war in Iraq and elsewhere. Write here some utter nonsense.
      1. Max otto
        Max otto 2 September 2013 20: 37
        +1
        Quote: Alexej
        And nothing, they protested and calmed down by watching beautiful films about the war in Iraq and elsewhere. Write here some nonsense utterly.

        Vladimir Vladimirovich? Is that you personally? laughing
        1. alone
          alone 2 September 2013 21: 02
          +3
          Quote: Max Otto
          Vladimir Vladimirovich? Is that you personally?


          wassat not he it))) "gentlemen of good luck (meeting Kramarov with a school friend)
      2. Essenger
        Essenger 2 September 2013 21: 43
        +2
        Quote: Alexej
        Believe me, everyone is more violet what you think specifically.

        Is this something from the category of du-cancer itself? )))
        Find the sentence where I wrote "I think". Here I described the situation.

        Quote: Alexej
        Write here some kind of utter nonsense.

        Oh, I hit along the way)))
        1. Alexei
          Alexei 3 September 2013 05: 48
          +1
          Quote: Essenger
          Find the sentence where I wrote "I think". Here I described the situation.

          You do not describe the situation, but only state how you see and think. Or you, when you see the situation, do not think what you see. Or do not see when you think.
    3. Panikovsky
      Panikovsky 2 September 2013 19: 37
      +3
      maybe it’s violet to everyone that Putin will say, even though I personally don’t think so, but, I believe that the bombing of Syria is more than a crime, it’s a mistake. Joseph Foucher was a man exceptionally dishonorable, but you and I left a proverb.
    4. Corsair5912
      Corsair5912 2 September 2013 20: 24
      +1
      Quote: Essenger
      The West is slow in the blow not because the Russian Federation or China is against, but the people are really against.

      Euros and Yankees presidents have never been interested in the opinion of any people.
      Their people are zombified to the level of brainless cattle.
      But the Russian Federation and China can so crush the Yankees and Euros economically and politically that their people will not find it enough.
      While Moscow and Beijing are chewing snot, and not expressing themselves specifically, the West is behaving arrogantly.
      During the Caribbean Crisis, Nikita Khrushchev asked John F. Kennedy such a question - Are you sure that the United States is able to withstand a thermonuclear strike - that John immediately lost the desire to bomb Cuba and support the invasion.
      1. tilovaykrisa
        tilovaykrisa 2 September 2013 20: 41
        +3
        Khrushchev and Kennedy did not conduct direct negotiations during the Caribbean crisis, everything was done through the USSR ambassador in Washington and the representative of the presidential administration. The legend is beautiful but untrue. But the fact that Khrushchev sympathized with Kennedy is a fact, according to his translator, when Kennedy answered the question of Khrushchev how old he was, how many years old tears came to N. Khrushchev’s eyes and he said that his son would have been exactly that much and that Kennedy was something to him reminds him.
        1. alone
          alone 2 September 2013 21: 03
          +3
          wink but despite this, he wanted to give him a mother Kuzkin)))))))))))))) bully
          1. tilovaykrisa
            tilovaykrisa 2 September 2013 21: 07
            +2
            YOU better answer what does the personal bodyguard of I. Aliyev do as an instructor in the training camp for militants?
            1. alone
              alone 2 September 2013 21: 13
              +1
              what a personal bodyguard, well, let's reference please)))
              1. tilovaykrisa
                tilovaykrisa 2 September 2013 21: 18
                0
                http://anna-news.info/node/12302
                closer to 40 minutes, previously he had not been seen in a lie.
                1. alone
                  alone 2 September 2013 21: 38
                  +7
                  As for the Azerbaijanis fighting in Syria, we know them. These are about 100 people,
                  professing Wahhabism, more than half of which have already been killed there. those who, if they return alive, sit down for a long time. We do not stand on ceremony with such people.
                  As for his words, I’ll say the following: no market merchant will go to war, as well as a janitor. People who fight in Syria have excellent funding. They don’t need to trade in markets or sweep Moscow streets. to understand this, you don’t need to be a doctor of economic sciences. You just need to understand the essence of the network of jihadists.
                  1. experienced
                    experienced 2 September 2013 21: 41
                    +4
                    Quote: lonely
                    As for the Azerbaijanis fighting in Syria, we know them. These are about 100 people,

                    It’s stupid to blame on the principle of nationality, they’re also fighting from Russia there ... They’re bandits hi regardless of religious grounds, they took up arms or to earn money
                    1. alone
                      alone 2 September 2013 21: 53
                      +3
                      totally agree. hi
                    2. tilovaykrisa
                      tilovaykrisa 2 September 2013 22: 12
                      +1
                      And this is how to look, dear, remember the interview with the captured Syrian, because he had a business here and his wife, and he was not a boy far away, but a Wahhabi relative sang to him and went to arrange jihad. Well, Musin is not so wrong (not specifically about Azerbaijanis), many fathers work, but the kids are by no means looking for easy money, the propagandists are listening to the holy war, and instead of learning how to work, semi-criminal affairs are being twisted, it’s precisely them who are recruited they are most likely in question.
                      Russians are not visible there, the citizens of the Russian Federation really are there, and as the Syrians say, they are the ones who cut the heads of the priests (I hope everyone knows where these citizens are from), well, I hope they stay there.
                      1. alone
                        alone 2 September 2013 22: 44
                        +2
                        Do you know who the director of the regnum agency is? an Armenian named Vigen Hakobyan. he will write anything about us. and as for personal protection, I’ll say this: anyone who knows the presidents’ personal actions will confirm my words. There are no current or former people in this structure. All these people are under special control. For people, even permission to leave the country is subject to special permission.
                        Vigen Hakobyan’s sick imagination. Do you think I. Aliyev is so weak that he will be so rudely substituted?)))
            2. smersh70
              smersh70 2 September 2013 22: 34
              +4
              Quote: tilovaykrisa
              YOU better answer what does the personal bodyguard of I. Aliyev do as an instructor in the training camp for militants?

              The training camps for rebels from post-Soviet countries in Syria, who have opened a front against the dictatorship of Bashar al-Assad, are headed by the personal bodyguard of Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev, expert Marat Musin, who returned from Syria, said in an interview with the Internet TV channel Neuromir-TV, Regnum news agency reported. wassat
              according to Musin and his performance and his video, Assad long ago restored territorial integrity and killed all bearded men)))

              and which Agency it distributed - REGNUM itself fellow Well, there are no words)))))
              1. tilovaykrisa
                tilovaykrisa 3 September 2013 10: 08
                0
                Well, not all of them, of course, but he wasn’t noticed in outright lies. If you watch the videos of the Wahhabis, they’ve already executed Assad 5 times, all the soldiers ran away for a long time, all of them were destroyed, and all of Syria was their only capital laughing However, they knead them well and put the pack in real, it’s enough to look at their sites where they themselves publish lists of their dead and even their hirelings burn like dogs.
        2. Corsair5912
          Corsair5912 3 September 2013 17: 13
          0
          Quote: tilovaykrisa
          Khrushchev and Kennedy did not conduct direct negotiations during the Caribbean crisis, everything was done through the USSR ambassador in Washington and the representative of the presidential administration. The legend is beautiful but untrue.

          This is most likely a legend, but in the 60 years in the USSR this was considered an undoubted fact. The negotiations between the Kremlin and Washington during the Caribbean crisis were conducted not only through the ambassador, but also through a direct line (red telephone), through a cable line through the Atlantic Ocean, but Khrushchev did not speak English, and Kennedy did not speak Russian.
      2. Essenger
        Essenger 2 September 2013 21: 52
        +4
        Quote: Corsair5912
        Euros and Yankees presidents have never been interested in the opinion of any people.

        Unfortunately, the heads of all countries include such our (

        Quote: Corsair5912
        Their people are zombified to the level of brainless cattle.

        Maybe

        Quote: Corsair5912
        But the Russian Federation and China can so crush the Yankees and Euros economically and politically that their people will not find it enough.

        I will not say at the expense of the Russian Federation, but the Chinese are tied to them economically. The Chinese are trying to reorient to the domestic market, if they succeed, it may be that in the future the Chinese will be more rigid in relation to the West. Unlikely at the moment

        Quote: Corsair5912
        While Moscow and Beijing are chewing snot, and not expressing themselves specifically, the West is behaving arrogantly.

        The question is, why do they chew snot?
    5. Tersky
      Tersky 2 September 2013 21: 18
      +9
      Quote: Essenger
      Putin's opinion is the latest that excites Kerry and Obama.

      Well, well ... none other than Nazarbayev’s opinion worries him the most. The opinion of the president of a state with nuclear weapons capable of repeatedly wiping the United States off the face of the earth and having 1/6 of the land is of most concern to him, and he scored on his people and his opinion as well as on the UN and the US Congress, by the way chosen by the same people.
      Quote: Essenger
      Yesterday I watched Secretary of State Kerry’s speech, he very carefully chose words, spoke about responsibility to history.
      not new ... look at all the speeches of US secretaries of state before the war, complete peace and negation, and the result is always the opposite.
      Quote: Essenger
      Not Obama asks for a meeting with Putin, but Putin wants to meet with Obama. Draw conclusions.
      Here is the summit and it will show who asks whom and who desires whom. Draw conclusions.
      1. Essenger
        Essenger 2 September 2013 22: 05
        +2
        Quote: Tersky
        Well, well ... none other than Nazarbayev’s opinion worries him the most.

        Is this an attempt to offend me?))) Yes, I agree with Nazarbayev’s opinion more violet than Putin’s opinion))) Satisfied?

        Quote: Tersky
        Opinion of the President of a state with nuclear weapons capable of repeatedly erasing the United States

        Well, all these are theories, theoretically yes.

        Quote: Tersky
        having 1/6 of the land he cares most about

        I do not want to offend you, but this is a ridiculous argument about the territory. If we measure across the territory, well then, let's ask the views of Kazakhstan, Australia and Canada? Why not? They are large in territory.

        Quote: Tersky
        and he scored on his people and his opinion as well as on the UN and the US Congress, by the way chosen by the same people.

        Of course he would like to send people with his opinion, but it doesn’t work out.

        Quote: Tersky
        Here is the summit and it will show who asks whom and who desires whom. Draw conclusions.

        Let's give a primitive example. You write to me, I’m no longer going to discuss with you. I answer they say you're wrong, let's sit and talk on this topic again, etc.
        Who is the winner? Of course, you.
        1. Tersky
          Tersky 2 September 2013 22: 23
          +4
          Quote: Essenger
          This is an attempt to hurt me?)))

          The same as your hurt Russian users))
          Quote: Essenger
          Well, all these are theories, theoretically yes.
          Do you think that Obama is only a practitioner and far from theory?
          Quote: Essenger
          I do not want to offend you, but this is a ridiculous argument about the territory.
          This is far from a ridiculous argument, all the wars against Russia did not end in favor of the interventionists and because of its vast territory ...
          Quote: Essenger
          You write to me, I’m no longer going to discuss with you. I answer they say you're wrong, let's sit and talk on this topic again, etc.
          I didn’t hear something like that from Obama, the only thing known is that he’s allegedly not going to the summit in St. Petersburg, but this does not mean that informal negotiations are not held between the BO and the GDP on the situation in Syria
          1. Essenger
            Essenger 2 September 2013 23: 59
            0
            Quote: Tersky
            The same as your hurt Russian users))

            There was no such plan, because Putin is not all of Russia, and Russia is not Putin.
            Putin is an ordinary person, criticism should not hurt the Russians, I think. At least, I do not perceive Nazarbayev’s criticism as a criticism of Kazakhstan.
            because Nazarbayev is not Kazakhstan.

            Quote: Tersky
            Do you think that Obama is only a practitioner and far from theory?

            I talked about the fact that theoretically Russia can erase the United States.

            Quote: Tersky
            This is far from a ridiculous argument, all the wars against Russia did not end in favor of the interventionists and because of its vast territory ...

            You take away on a different topic.

            Quote: Tersky
            I didn’t hear something like that from Obama, the only thing known is that he’s allegedly not going to the summit in St. Petersburg, but this does not mean that informal negotiations are not held between the BO and the GDP on the situation in Syria

            He will come to the summit, but there will be no personal bilateral meeting with Putin.
    6. falcon
      falcon 2 September 2013 21: 46
      +1
      Quote: Essenger
      Yesterday I watched Secretary of State Kerry’s speech, he very carefully chose words, spoke about responsibility to history. He swore that he also did not want war and was tired of this, like the whole American people, etc.

      One smart man once said: “Politicians need words to
      hide your thoughts. "
      1. igor.borov775
        igor.borov775 3 September 2013 04: 23
        0
        I once read a press conference of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. They didn’t come up with a different style to say everything and nothing specifically about their work. They talk beautifully and much, but then there’s no specifics
  21. stroporez
    stroporez 2 September 2013 19: 54
    +1
    the words were correct, beautiful ....... for the kit, it remains to wait for the same things ...........
  22. waisson
    waisson 2 September 2013 20: 18
    -1
    declared but did not take decisive action - SHAME !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!
  23. Vyalik
    Vyalik 2 September 2013 20: 18
    0
    In general, questions about Syria, and so to speak, a logical series: Libya, Egypt, Syria ... should be asked Dmitry Anatolyevich. After all, he was so famously at one time merging the colonel, hiding behind democracy, American partners.
    1. igor.borov775
      igor.borov775 3 September 2013 04: 39
      0
      To whom, YOU are a lawyer, he knows so much that we never dreamed of, but iPhone received as a gift and on the same day our agent cell was arrested and he graciously had lunch with the most important Democratizer in the world, Not everyone is honored And not everyone gets such a nuisance when the agents of your country are caught in your arrival, And what is strange is that he was silent like a fish later, But PUTIN, as always, clearly answered this badly and in this matter the worst was that the traitor surrendered, And when something was lured about past such blows, he clearly answered the traitor is a traitor and do not hang any democratic garbage on them, After all, he said as he thinks,
  24. anfreezer
    anfreezer 2 September 2013 20: 22
    +2
    Essenger It seems to everyone that Putin thinks violet.Maybe you own some information !!? And about "violet" I will say that not only would Syria be smashed to hell, but you would write your text in the radioactive desert on clay tablets. (Maybe too harshly hibut something is slowing them down !?). The question is purely rhetorical ..
  25. Nayhas
    Nayhas 2 September 2013 20: 35
    0
    “As for the position of our American colleagues, friends, who claim that government forces used weapons of mass destruction, in this case, chemical weapons, and say that they have such evidence, let them then present it to UN inspectors and the Security Council.
    If there is evidence, they must be presented. "- interestingly John Kerry immediately reacted and said that the evidence of the use of chemical weapons was transferred to Russia, but" Moscow decided to "ignore them." Whether this evidence was passed on to the UN Security Council is unclear. But here Lavrov, at a meeting with MGIMO students (it is not clear why exactly there), states that he received documents from the United States, but "The US data on the use of chemical weapons in Syria, which were provided to Russia as evidence, does not contain anything specific."
    Here, of course, interest arises, but what kind of data is this? What kind of evidence did Lavrov consider non-specific? For example, if the United States did not dig anything serious, then their disinterest in publicity is understandable, but why then Russia will not indicate in the open press that this was provided to us by the United States, this is obvious garbage, and this is tense on speculation ...
    In short, the back rows also want to know the details!
    "The Syrian government army is advancing. The so-called rebels are in a difficult position. They do not have the weapons that government forces have: no aviation, no missile technology, no modern missile and artillery systems." - Putin, as always, was lying, the offensive of the Syrian army is only in the government news, while the offensive has been going on for a month in the same settlements. In one thing, Putin is right, the groups opposing the government forces have neither aviation nor missile technology, they do not have modern missile and artillery systems, but this does not prevent them from opposing the army and, in addition, fighting each other.
    PS: By the way, "01.09.2013/81/XNUMX. Mujahideen brigades" FSA captured the base of the XNUMXst brigade in Kalmun, north-west of Damascus. On social networks, the rebels thank Russia for the supply of new tanks and express confidence that they will cope with Assad without America. "
  26. Nayhas
    Nayhas 2 September 2013 20: 38
    -5

    This is at the expense of Assad's successes. So only the Syrian army can "successfully" throw tanks and armored vehicles ... "Puten will send more, he has a lot ..."
    1. alone
      alone 2 September 2013 21: 10
      +1
      Yes, the video is clear evidence that I’ve already said several times. The military will leave everything without destroying to leave. And no one will punish them. Because all this goes to them DAROM. It’s not paid a dime. And where comments from our comrades who claimed that the Syrian army was close to victory? We don’t see this in the video.
      1. experienced
        experienced 2 September 2013 21: 20
        +6
        Quote: lonely
        The military will abandon everything and without destroying leave. And for this no one will punish them. Because all this goes to them for free

        Well here, as they say, you can recall the recent past winked
        During only one of the battles, the Karabakh troops took 22 tanks and infantry fighting vehicles as trophies
        Taken here: http: //forum.vardanank.org/index.php? Showtopic = 182167
        Georgia also did not pay for the equipment? Russia also took good trophies there ...
        1. alone
          alone 2 September 2013 21: 48
          +3
          hello, Alexey. the Georgians threw the equipment because Mishiko got into a shit, got into shock. And with him the whole military command. And when there are no orders, the army panics, an erratic departure begins. It’s not surprising that in Georgia you took a lot of trophies technicians.

          about vardanaka. there and find such. as a direct participant in the war, I declare with all responsibility: it was impossible to use so much equipment in any battle in the highlands. Knowing perfectly the structure of the Azerbaijani military units, I can assure you that not a single battalion brigade of the Azerbaijani army of the 1992-1994 type had so much military equipment . I advise you to read there about the Armenian BTR-70, which, despite being beaten by all the parties, still captured the positions of our troops. But it’s real that the BTR-70 can survive in an intense battle during an attack. A simple lieutenant from the school knows) ))) hi
          1. experienced
            experienced 2 September 2013 21: 53
            +1
            Quote: lonely
            the Georgians threw the equipment because Mishiko crap one's pants, got into a shock. And with it the entire military command. And when there are no orders, the army panic, an erratic departure begins. It is not surprising that in Georgia yours took a lot of equipment to the trophy.

            Hi Omar hi Well, you're right. But when the databases go on, they think more and more about life and death, and not about the hardware they are fighting on, and therefore it’s hard to blame soldiers and officers without knowing the conditions in which the equipment was thrown ... hi
            Although alarming reports of the capture of insurgents airfields, fortifications, military camps. Having artillery, armored vehicles, aviation, and so on ... recourse
            1. Nayhas
              Nayhas 2 September 2013 22: 30
              +3
              Quote: seasoned
              Although alarming reports of the capture of insurgents airfields, fortifications, military camps. Having artillery, armored vehicles, aviation, and so on, everything must be surrendered ..

              Yeah, it would seem a bucket of diesel fuel, a torch from rags and matches ... It doesn’t take so much time to bring equipment into disrepair, destroy ammunition, turn warehouses into flaming ruins from which fragments of exploding shells fly out, preventing the invaders from gaining a foothold in the captured area. I'm not talking about the total mining of such objects, but if it’s difficult with mine-explosive equipment or specialists, then for the first option a lot of mind is needed ...
              I constantly say that Assad's army is basically a poorly organized crowd that survives only at the expense of tanks (and Assad's tankers are really crazy guys) and artillery, for which I get a lot of minuses and angry tirades in praise of the "courageous Syrian army", but none of them could explain why the main supplier of weapons to all sorts of rebel groups is the Syrian army itself?
              1. alone
                alone 2 September 2013 22: 46
                +6
                Syrian armored forces-the elite of the ground forces. Even the Israeli military never speak badly about the Syrian tankmen. If they say something, then with respect
              2. smersh70
                smersh70 2 September 2013 22: 59
                +2
                Quote: Nayhas
                for which I get full of cons



                ... and I, too, with you ... crying smile .
            2. alone
              alone 2 September 2013 22: 37
              +2
              here I am the same, was it really difficult to destroy it? you saw the militants seized the tanks, immediately brought them on and went on. I don’t know how it all happened (you never know what could be there), but this is not an isolated case , it just makes you wonder. Well, let's say the tanks weren’t able to detonate, but anti-tank missiles, artillery depot warehouses, a lot of light and heavy weapons depots? after all, the armored vehicles of the militants are not imported, but a trophy. Do those who drop it and run, don’t understand that it will all be used against them? I still ignore the fact of surrendering air defense depots under Damascus, where militants posed with s-125 and -200.
              1. Nayhas
                Nayhas 2 September 2013 22: 44
                +2
                Quote: lonely
                here I am, is it really difficult to destroy all this?

                Well, when in my head only thoughts of salvation do not care about technology. Apparently Assad does not have tribunals, i.e. it is not punishable. The most interesting rebels said that they had captured 25 new tanks ready for use, so the message, like Putin, send more, is useful to us. Maybe it was a rear base that was guarded by those who squandered from the war ...
              2. Sandov
                Sandov 3 September 2013 01: 26
                +1
                Alone.
                Making a movie is easy. All this is a production. Syrians urinate rats, this is the main thing. Obvious successes, it was not without reason that the amers were so excited that they wanted to bomb Syria. They use the Islamic world to the fullest.

                By the way, I want to ask what your profile picture means. Clones a lot of them something.
              3. igor.borov775
                igor.borov775 3 September 2013 05: 20
                0
                And I mean Europe’s deliveries of Russian weapons from the democracies, there are a lot of samples of our equipment and weapons, I threw so many dibs in Qatar in Egypt and Syria, but there’s no sense, Immediately the new government in Egypt put the wrong ones in Syria, in general, darkness sucks the loot like a pump but there is no return, the Saudis had to urgently ask for help one Qatar is no longer pulling, the Saudis have a bigger wallet but they worry a lot too but apart from propaganda it really doesn’t turn out to be troublesome and expensive, and the oblique views of friends depress, it remains to ask the main democrats and there they themselves complicated everything all sorts of red lines drew in your mind you will go right away you need to adapt, And the main one is the main one as soon as you come alive it is miraculous ships moved a little bit left A little freebie there was practically no border guard , she was guarded by local police KP only on the roads and so just walk and that's it, We entered almost quietly and immediately across the country in many areas fights broke out while sorted out while organized almost it turned out and it was necessary such a bummer began, They began to kill the faithful fighters of the patriots of freedom, The situation is very unique almost everywhere throughout the country, the patriots began fighting a little more and the victory ended, and the infidels Syrians slowly began to surround and destroy the most it’s terrible that the first shock and misunderstanding of who the people came from is over. Now it’s not sweet for freedom-loving fighters that they’re just beginning to destroy them, and it’s scary that the number of those killed begins to exceed those who break in there; it’s very bad only the main one can help,
            3. smersh70
              smersh70 2 September 2013 22: 58
              0


              From minute to minute on the network, Syrian rebels distributed a video in which, they said, they shot down a government plane Bashar al-Assad.
              1. Nayhas
                Nayhas 2 September 2013 23: 03
                0
                Quote: smersh70
                shot down a government plane Bashar al-Assad.

                do you mean a military plane?
                1. smersh70
                  smersh70 2 September 2013 23: 18
                  +1
                  Quote: Nayhas
                  war plane?


                  they say - his civilian government board .... well, like a personal plane ....
              2. Sandov
                Sandov 3 September 2013 01: 28
                0
                Do not take rat messages seriously. Seven miles to heaven.
          2. GREAT RUSSIA
            GREAT RUSSIA 2 September 2013 21: 57
            +1
            Where did you fight? In Afghanistan?
            1. alone
              alone 2 September 2013 22: 32
              +3
              if the question is related to me, I’ll answer: I fought with the Azerbaijani army during the Karabakh war.
              1. Nayhas
                Nayhas 2 September 2013 22: 47
                +2
                Quote: lonely
                if the question is related to me, I’ll answer: I fought in the Azerbaijani army during the Karabakh war

                not the topic, but personally I always adhered to the side of Azerbaijan in the Karabakh issue, although it was very difficult to understand, especially from Siberia ...
                1. alone
                  alone 2 September 2013 22: 53
                  +3
                  Well, I think we’ll leave it here. the theme is still about Syria)) hi thanks for the support
                  1. GREAT RUSSIA
                    GREAT RUSSIA 4 September 2013 23: 09
                    0
                    I understood you with respect to you. hi hi hi
    2. vladkavkaz
      vladkavkaz 2 September 2013 22: 22
      +3
      What does this video confirm? Fucking hell knows where, they’ve taken something? It’s like a cemetery with broken equipment or a battalion, or what’s moving, so the Turks supplied the equipment to the spirits - In general, this does not prove anything. It is possible that this is generally the territory of IRAQ, and not Syria, all kinds of video fakes from Wahhabis in the internet a dime a dozen.
      1. Nayhas
        Nayhas 2 September 2013 22: 38
        0
        Quote: vladkavkaz
        What does this video confirm? Scorching horseradish knows where, they’ve taken something? So maybe a cemetery with broken equipment or a rembat, but what’s moving, so the Turks delivered the equipment to the spirits

        The description indicates that this is the 81st Brigade base in Kalmun, northwest of Damascus, and the rebels boasted that they had captured 25 new equipped tanks ready for use. The video shows thorn fences, shafts, a sports town and boxes with equipment, T-72 and BREM-1. The fact that "the hell knows where" is because the operator does not shoot in the sight, this is not a damn movie about a war or a video game.
        1. Artyom
          Artyom 2 September 2013 22: 50
          +2
          the video shows that the guys are walking in the fork, fighting is really invisible
          1. Nayhas
            Nayhas 2 September 2013 23: 06
            0
            Quote: Artyom
            the video shows that the guys are walking in the fork, fighting is really invisible

            Duc because the army left, they already mounted a tank and ride there ...
          2. smersh70
            smersh70 2 September 2013 23: 21
            +2
            Quote: Artyom
            the video shows that the guys are walking in a fork,


            it’s you don’t ask us .... but the Minister of Defense of Syria .. or Bashar Assad ... to the far end of Marat Musin ..)))))
      2. alone
        alone 2 September 2013 22: 49
        +3
        where did the turks have t-72 tanks? at the end of the video you can see the brand new t-72 with the bearded flag moving towards the battle from the captured barracks. answer how the new t-72 ended up in the cemetery with broken equipment? yes, I understand that the vast majority wants Syrian army victory. but this desire should not overshadow the mind, logic and eyes.
    3. Artyom
      Artyom 2 September 2013 22: 47
      +2
      on the video there is no date of shooting events, it could be a year ago!
      1. alone
        alone 2 September 2013 22: 56
        0
        a year ago, Wahhabis who arrived from beyond the hillock were just beginning to capture the northern regions. Now they are already under Damascus.
        1. Russ69
          Russ69 2 September 2013 23: 13
          0
          Quote: lonely
          a year ago, Wahhabis who arrived from beyond the hillock were just beginning to capture the northern regions. Now they are already under Damascus.

          War without a front line, focal. Where they want to be.
          1. alone
            alone 2 September 2013 23: 18
            +2
            that's right. there’s no solid line. everything is like a layer cake. fighters are more mobile, because there is not enough heavy equipment, they use pick-ups can cover two 100-120 km in an hour, they can appear where they weren’t before. Most likely in the case of Kalmun the role is a factor of surprise, but still it was impossible to throw it all so recklessly.
            it means that the protection of military facilities is not at the same level as we would like. Usually, in such conflicts, the entire perimeter of the base is organized several kilometers wide by a network of roadblocks that are interconnected to prevent a sudden breakthrough
        2. Sandov
          Sandov 3 September 2013 01: 32
          -1
          Either amers rushed to save their rats. They are wetted over an adult. The main thing now is that the border is not crossed in the opposite direction. Good luck to the people of Syria in the holy struggle against evil fed by amers and saudi
    4. Jin
      Jin 3 September 2013 00: 13
      +1
      Quote: Nayhas
      This is at the expense of Assad's successes. So only the Syrian army can "successfully" throw tanks and armored vehicles ... "Puten will send more, he has a lot ..."


      What is this for? laughing And why are a bunch of some people mostly in bright yellow ??? Another leftist for suckers negative Where is it, who is it, when is it, what are they doing there, why in such a heap where does the machine gun shoot? laughing Chushnyak such, no strength ... Really, a report for the owners, another mediocre not-about-nothing-and-nothing-about-anything ... Everything is far-fetched, like most such movies bullshit from mediocrities and ignoramuses ("rebels "). At least they would have removed something worthwhile, since they are working out the loot, they are completely stupid, parasites laughing

      I couldn’t resist directly, I revised again, FULL LAZHATINA !!!
  27. SPACE
    SPACE 2 September 2013 20: 53
    +3
    VLADIMIR PUTIN: Frankly, for me it is a complete surprise.

    VLADIMIR PUTIN: You know what, how do I know? You ask them.

    laughing laughing laughing We are soft and fluffy and practically nothing to do with. winked repeat wassat
    just utter nonsense.

    And it was a clinical diagnosis. fool
    1. Apollo
      Apollo 2 September 2013 21: 09
      13
      No comments

      1. Jin
        Jin 3 September 2013 00: 22
        +1
        Quote: Apollon
        No comments


        Yeah! Abalde! Well, at least we are learning propaganda and the info war ... otherwise the Western media, as usual, set up ordinary Syrians against Russia, there was a period in this war, very unpleasant, when they almost failed (((
  28. anfreezer
    anfreezer 2 September 2013 21: 28
    +3
    Nayhas YOU REMOVED YOURSELF, WERE ..!? winkYou can remove the plot so that you lose the sense of reality, and with it the logic ... On the other hand, you can find many similar plots, but the fact is that we believe in VICTORY OF OURS (red, Soviet, etc. ...), and you doubt it, that is, whom you work for !? I’m also not from the front ranks, but I’ll manage without details, if our fathers doubted during the war, then .. and I will believe that the Syrian people are defending their homeland (and, what is strange about this, we also threw technology and equipment into WWII , and surrendered to the shelves, BUT WE WIN!)
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. alone
      alone 2 September 2013 21: 51
      +2
      Quote: anfreezer
      REMOVED YOURSELF, WERE ..!? You can remove the plot so that you lose the sense of reality, and with it the logic ... On the other hand, you can find many similar plots, but the fact is that we believe in VICTORY OF OURS (red, Soviet, etc. ...), and you doubt it, that is, whom you work for !? I’m also not from the front ranks, but I’ll manage without details, if our fathers doubted during the war, then .. and I will believe that the Syrian people are defending their homeland (and, what is strange about this, we also threw technology and equipment into WWII , and surrendered to the shelves, BUT WE WIN!)


      Yes!! we won!! the Soviet people defeated, all the peoples who lived under the USSR

      and about that video, can you tell me this is a Hollywood movie?
    3. Nayhas
      Nayhas 2 September 2013 22: 58
      +1
      Quote: anfreezer
      You can remove the plot so that you lose the sense of reality, and with it the logic ...

      Yes, Avatar looked.
      Quote: anfreezer
      Do you doubt, that is, whom you work for !?

      I work for a private person, what does this have to do with the topic?
      Quote: anfreezer
      but the fact is that we believe in VICTORY OF OUR

      and who is "your" there? Mine is no one there, tk. I am not a Muslim and, accordingly, I am not a Shiite or a Sunni, and you?
      Quote: anfreezer
      I will believe that the Syrian people are defending their homeland

      so there are Syrian people from all sides and each side is fighting for its Syria, so if you think that Assad is behind the people, you must agree that the people are against him too
      Quote: anfreezer
      and what’s strange about this, we also threw technology and equipment into the Great Patriotic War and surrendered to the regiments, BUT WE WIN!

      what does this have to do with the civil war in Syria? And to be honest, do not ascribe to yourself what you did not do. Those who fought and worked in the rear won, I doubt that at that time you had any plans at all ...
  29. aspirin02
    aspirin02 2 September 2013 21: 50
    0
    What's next after Syria? Full-blown Xnumx Worldwide?
    1. alone
      alone 2 September 2013 21: 54
      +1
      you can’t wait to die a painful death?))) wassat
      1. tilovaykrisa
        tilovaykrisa 2 September 2013 22: 07
        +1
        everyone will die in the 3rd world, partly immediately the rest within 2-3 years. So God forbid.
        1. alone
          alone 2 September 2013 23: 09
          +2
          Quote: tilovaykrisa
          everyone will die in the 3rd world, partly immediately the rest within 2-3 years. So God forbid.


          but you know what’s interesting to me? over the past week, after reading the comments of more than a dozen articles about Syria, almost every third writing commentary persistently suggested that America be hit with nuclear weapons. At the same time, they were sure that there would be no answer to this step and everyone would survive)))
          1. tilovaykrisa
            tilovaykrisa 2 September 2013 23: 29
            +1
            I may be pleased with such optimism, but you are an adequate person and you understand who leaves such kamenty))) I am glad for the fighting spirit of these people, but unfortunately they do not represent the consequences of such acts. Although this may only be my opinion, I served just in the Strategic Missile Forces hi
  30. komel
    komel 2 September 2013 21: 52
    0
    Russia, China, Cuba, Venezuela and Iran oppose US military intervention in Syria
    1. igor.borov775
      igor.borov775 3 September 2013 06: 01
      0
      080 The Lord is practically against us, all this is the payment that we earned with all our might assent to America, In fact, we felt this in
      08,08, 2008, At the UN we were completely defeated and only a veto at the UN Security Council saved us, How quickly we forget, it is from this period that we need to report on what our diplomats did, What we have in the end while we are pressured whether we want it or not, We have to gain experience on the go, so it happened that we lost too much, Yes, even the nearest neighbors don’t understand what we are talking about, but there’s nothing to say about the distant neighbors. we think otom or something else but still try not to see us, But !!! I am glad that now they are starting to look at us in surprise, We find ourselves having our own point of view, And we are ready to defend the interests of the state, It’s not possible to appear stronger with the strengthening of the economy, Whether we like it or not, Now we are checking how it works, But we while in the international arena they try to give pokes, but we don’t always endure, With the growth of the economy, the attitude will slowly but surely change, you think no one notices this, you are mistaken notice and try to hit harder, but I think it will go away soon, Everything is done correctly, the economy is strengthening and they start to notice us until we see, That lesson did not pass for nothing, We learned and understood correctly,
  31. Gecko
    Gecko 2 September 2013 21: 58
    +3
    WOLF AND LAMB

    The strong is always powerless to blame:
    To that in History we hear the darkness of examples
    But we do not write stories;
    And here about how in Fables speak.

    ___

    On a hot day, the lamb went to the stream to get drunk;
    And I need to happen,
    What about those places hungry wolf Wolf.
    He sees the lamb, seeks prey;
    But, to give the case, although a legitimate view and sense,
    Shouts: "How dare you, insolent, with an unclean snout
    Here is a pure stir up drink
    My
    With sand and silt?
    For insolence
    I'll rip your head off. "
    "When the brightest Wolf allows,
    I dare to bring that down the stream
    From the lordship of his steps I drink a hundred;
    And he must be angry in vain:
    I can’t stir up a drink for him. "-
    "Therefore I lie!
    Worthless! I heard such impudence in the world!
    Yes, I remember that you are still in the summer before
    Here I was somehow rude:
    I have not forgotten this, buddy! "-
    "Have mercy, I am not a year old yet", -
    The lamb speaks. "So it was your brother."
    "I have no brothers." - "So this is a godfather il swat
    And, in a word, someone from your own family.
    You yourself, your dogs and your shepherds,
    You all want me to be evil
    And if you can, then you always harm me,
    But I’m with you for their divorced sins. "-
    “Ah, what am I to blame?” - “Be quiet! I'm tired of listening,
    Leisure me sort your fault, puppy!
    You are to blame for the fact that I want to eat. "
    Said and dragged into the dark forest Lamb.
  32. mitya-k
    mitya-k 2 September 2013 22: 08
    +1
    It is gratifying that we have such a president! In general, presidents should only be elected from state security agencies with good geopolitical training!
  33. Alex-z84
    Alex-z84 2 September 2013 22: 58
    +2
    According to the Oklahoman newspaper, citing U.S. military sources, a US 5 fighter of the F-22 Raptor generation crashed in northern Jordan on the night of Sunday to Monday. Sources report that the plane may have been shot down by Syrian missiles near the Syrian border. Military expert John Blu Reed told the newspaper that if the F-22 Raptor was really shot down, it confirms that the Syrian defense system does have new S-300 or even S-400 missiles. The American expert also said that the US-Russia relationship would be even more tense if it was confirmed that Russia had delivered S-400 missiles to Syria.

    In turn, the Los Angeles Times reported that Syrian air defense forces shot down four Tomahawk missiles launched by the US. Sources say that anti-aircraft missile defense systems (Bentsr 1) hit American missiles, and we can talk about impeccable accuracy. Sources in Washington confirm that four missiles were launched to test the degree of protection of the Syrian armed forces. Sources also confirmed that one of the main reasons for ending plans for a possible attack against Syria was the downed F-22 Raptor, as well as the fact that parts of Syrian air defense were able to hit four Tomahawk missiles. Recall that in Jordan there are only five units of F-22.
  34. Suhov
    Suhov 2 September 2013 23: 07
    +3
    Quote: Santor
    It is only our home-kitchen liberals who love to spoil their own President’s head, knowing enthusiastically that there will be nothing for it.
  35. Peaceful military
    Peaceful military 2 September 2013 23: 07
    +1
    The rhetoric of V.V. Putin is intelligible and in essence, BUT !, unfortunately, it does not have a continuation in dynamics, due to the lack of real support from the economic and military might of the state. Moreover, it was said afterwards that "the world economy fell and the Russian one followed it." Not to mention the open sabotage of the ongoing rearmament of the Armed Forces. sad
    1. studentmati
      studentmati 2 September 2013 23: 22
      0
      Quote: Peaceful military
      The rhetoric of V.V. Putin is intelligible and, in essence, BUT !, unfortunately has no continuation in dynamics, due to the lack of real support for the economic and military power of the state.


      Putin is an intelligence officer by training. The work of intelligence is always veiled and has a very specific purpose.

      I want to believe that the public words and actions (inaction) of Russia are just the information tip of the iceberg.
      1. Peaceful military
        Peaceful military 3 September 2013 00: 31
        0
        Everything is so, only this will not bring economic and military power. sad
        hi
        1. studentmati
          studentmati 3 September 2013 00: 35
          0
          Quote: Peaceful military
          Everything is so, only this will not bring economic and military power.


          Do you know that there is no help?
          1. Peaceful military
            Peaceful military 3 September 2013 00: 47
            0
            Sorry, what help?
            1. studentmati
              studentmati 3 September 2013 00: 49
              0
              Quote: Peaceful military
              Sorry, what help?


              In your words, military and economic. Reading the above typed comments.
              1. Peaceful military
                Peaceful military 3 September 2013 00: 58
                0
                Power, my friend, power ... smile
                hi
                1. studentmati
                  studentmati 3 September 2013 01: 08
                  +1
                  Quote: Peaceful military
                  Power, my friend, power ...


                  The power of the Syrian people and their government is already taking place, drinks at least judging by the ongoing war ... drinks
  36. Maks-80
    Maks-80 3 September 2013 00: 05
    +2
    Democracy is such a democracy
  37. Koronik
    Koronik 3 September 2013 05: 56
    +1
    I am proud of my PRESIDENT!
  38. navy1301
    navy1301 3 September 2013 06: 49
    +1
    I think Syria will owe more to Edward Snowden than anyone else - such a disagreement in NATO in relation to America ............. what kind of war with Syria ............. .Bravo Snowden and respect to those who were able to professionally "use" him
  39. Michael_59
    Michael_59 3 September 2013 07: 22
    +1
    Quote: Jin
    in bright yellow


    this is sponsorship sponsorship ...

    They took off the "presentation-report", and put on yellow T-shirts with the aim of making it easier for sponsors to see it and so that their own stoned militants would not shoot foolishly.
    1. Artyom
      Artyom 3 September 2013 10: 34
      0
      that's for sure, in a real battle in such clothes, it's easier to stick a target on your forehead!
  40. Silkway0026
    Silkway0026 3 September 2013 08: 13
    +2
    Lord, America, when will you cover yourself with a copper basin .....
  41. LaGlobal
    LaGlobal 3 September 2013 09: 38
    0
    Quote: Vadivak
    Putin is not Glory, he is Vladimir.

    I beg your pardon, after "Glory", I forgot to put ",". I repent!
  42. deman73
    deman73 3 September 2013 10: 11
    0
    clear answers to all questions posed
  43. Druid
    Druid 3 September 2013 10: 22
    +1
    Quote: Apollon
    that the Russian S-300 anti-aircraft missile systems (SAM) with our military advisers are already in Syria.
    Firstly, even if the S-300 were to be delivered to Syria, they would not play any role either in battle or as a deterrent to the West.
    Secondly, for reference, 700 cruise missiles were launched in Yugoslavia, 300 in Iraq, cruise missiles are not F-18 planes and coffins will not go to America, so if the Syrians drop even most of the missiles in the first stage, this will not stop the Americans.
    Thirdly, when people around from family members to colleagues were happy with the acquisition of S-300 by Azerbaijan to cool their ardor, it showed them like http://youtu.be/MsktE6E6DHU no one guarantees that this will not happen when we try to launch a rocket. For Russians, satellites fall with the carrier rocket almost every other time, and this is where the real grandmas and everything is in sight, I can imagine what is happening in the assembly of those missiles that they probably never use, this is me about the Mace, not even about missiles to C -300.
    Fourthly, Assad already has quite fresh Buk and Pantsir, you need to rely less on the S-300, which will be destroyed after the first launches, and it is normal to organize defense on some directions with these complexes, it will be necessary to fight with them, even if there is, even if the absence of the S-300 and there is more sense from them than from a low-mobility and inflexible "supersystem", which is more of a deterrent and a weapon of the first phase.
    Fifthly, Assad already has an S-200, although not the latest fashion, but it will perform its functions at long ranges at the beginning of the strike, although it will also be destroyed later.
    Sixth, in the presence of insurgents, there is a great risk of their destruction of air defense systems of any systems on the march, when deployed, the insurgents have many large-caliber sniper rifles, not in vain called anti-material ...
  44. Druid
    Druid 3 September 2013 11: 11
    +1
    Quote: Artyom
    Watch this broadcast carefully, it contains answers to many questions that are related to Syria
    Bullshit. I especially liked about the thousands of Azerbaijanis on the side of the militants, and even led by the personal bodyguard of Ilgam Aliyev laughing
    Firstly, Shiite Muslims prevail in Azerbaijan, this is a note.
    Secondly, not all Sunnis ran at a gallop into the "Wahabbites" and even fewer people from Shiites "by origin" joined them. "Several thousand" - almost the entire male population of the "Wahhabbi" community would disappear from the streets of Baku.
    Thirdly, even if you are a "Wahhabbit" and want to go "podzhihadstvovat", not the fact that it will be possible to get to Syria at all, but after getting to take part in battles. Recruiters and field commanders are selected according to criteria like in the Soviet military registration and enlistment office - ideology, general health, physical development (strength and endurance), skills and knowledge. Then a long period of preparation and only then transfer to the zone of this or that conflict, in the meantime, a "special department" of militants will also work on each candidate.
    Fourthly, in Azerbaijan all these lads with beards up to, say, waist-high and short pants - under a cap. And any adventures, even abroad, just do not pass for the "heroes". Despite the fact that most of these are rams who have joined from herd instinct and from being lost, plus for material reasons, non-deranged sons, few will dare to go anywhere. Even a hundred mentioned here by a fellow countryman is a lot in my opinion.
    Let me give an example, during the war in Chechnya, some Azerbaijanis were able to get there only in the initial period, when a real meat grinder and guerrilla fights took place in the mountains, most of the few volunteers who arrived at the Chechen camps in Georgia simply turned back, as field commanders refused them from -for health problems, physical fitness and stamina including, etc. etc.
  45. albanech
    albanech 3 September 2013 11: 49
    0
    Well done! Vladimir Vladimirovich as always in shock!
  46. Black
    Black 3 September 2013 12: 49
    0
    The president was precise, not particularly diplomatic (what we like a priori, although whether it’s right, I don’t know what ). A little strained by some kind of excessive "festivity" ... Thinks that the United States is in a mess? They will bombard, people will die, we have hardly saturated Syria with missile defense systems (if at all possible). What would be so - with a half-smile?
  47. Docent1984
    Docent1984 3 September 2013 15: 40
    0
    Quote: seasoned
    There, the rebels admitted to a Western correspondent that they "accidentally" messed with the XO, which they received from the SA


    where is the information from? can be more detailed?
    1. Cynic
      Cynic 3 September 2013 16: 05
      0
      Quote: Docent1984
      where is the information from?

      Maybe this
      http://topwar.ru/32797-video-primeneniya-boevikami-himicheskogo-oruzhiya-v-sirii
      .html
      bully
  48. vm68dm
    vm68dm 3 September 2013 16: 04
    0
    Two years in war
  49. Ilya Mikhalych
    Ilya Mikhalych 3 September 2013 16: 16
    0
    Ave Putin!
  50. regsSSSR
    regsSSSR 3 September 2013 18: 01
    0
    just do I have to say that I’m not an ardent fan of Putin’s drifted policy, but I must admit the fact that his last actions in the world look effective
    THE UNDER THE STATES was not Snowden (and how many conversations there was! That’s not!) And Syria was not in the UN not on d8, even though he was not afraid to speak out 1 against all and even earned himself a positive response from the backward electorate (which is very rare to admit)
    at the same time put all the same s-300 in Syria under the guise (it seems like even the United States confirm this according to statements)
    and he sent vsezhki to Syria, the fleet and in general he tries in every possible way to support Assad and today's statement uttered in his unique style (multi-vector translated into English) is a vivid example))