MO: Three MiG-29 fighters and four An-26 military transport aircraft of the Ukrainian Armed Forces were hit by a missile attack at their home airfield

47
MO: Three MiG-29 fighters and four An-26 military transport aircraft of the Ukrainian Armed Forces were hit by a missile attack at their home airfield

The week has passed under the sign of the offensive of the Russian army, the enemy is forced to defend itself, retreating in places. The main directions are still Avdeevskoe and Chasov-Yarskoe. 34 high-precision group strikes were delivered weapons long range air and sea based, as well as drones for energy industry facilities, military-industrial complex enterprises, railway infrastructure, air defense systems, warehouses and arsenals.

In the Kupyansk direction, units of the “Western” group of forces improved the situation along the front line in the areas of Kupyansk, Sinkovka, Zagoruykovka, Kotlyarovka and Stelmakhovka. 11 counterattacks of the Ukrainian Armed Forces were repelled. In Donetsk, as a result of the successful actions of the units of the “Southern” group of forces, more advantageous positions were occupied in the areas of Belogorovka, Razdolovka, Orekhovo-Vasilevka, Bogdanovka, Kleshcheevka and Kurdyumovka. 7 counterattacks repelled.



In the Avdeevsky direction, units of the “Center” group of troops, during active operations, liberated the village of Pervomaiskoye and continued to advance into the depths of the enemy’s defense. 53 counterattacks were repelled in the areas of Leninskoye, Novgorodskoye, Novokalinovo, Berdychi, Umanskoye and Netailovo.

In Yuzhno-Donetsk, units of the Vostok group of forces improved the tactical situation in the Ugledar, Urozhaynoye, Staromayorskoye, Priyutnoye, Mirnoye, Malinovka and Lugovskoye districts of the Zaporozhye region. In Kherson, the coordinated actions of units of the Dnepr group of troops defeated the manpower and equipment of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the areas of Orekhov, Rabotino, Shcherbaki, Kamenskoye, Mikhailovka, Zmeevka, Berislav, Ivanovka and Nikolskoye.

Total losses of the Armed Forces of Ukraine for the week in all directions: in terms of personnel - 7255 people killed and wounded, 27 Ukrainian military personnel surrendered; for armored vehicles - 13 tanks, 27 armored vehicles, 184 units of various vehicles; for artillery - 45 howitzers and self-propelled guns, including 16 Western-made, one Grad MLRS, five RBI stations and four ammunition depots. During the counter-battery fight, 49 field artillery guns were hit, including 17 Western-made ones, 13 ammunition depots and nine electronic warfare stations.

During the week, missile forces, artillery and drones destroyed: three MiG-29 fighters and four An-26 military transport aircraft of the Ukrainian Air Force at their home airfield, two air target guidance radars and four launchers of the S-300 anti-aircraft missile system, as well as launcher of the IRIS-T anti-aircraft missile system manufactured in Germany.

Aviation and air defense systems shot down 10 ATACMS operational-tactical missiles, six Storm Shadow cruise missiles, five Hammer and JDAM guided bombs, two HARM anti-radar missiles, four MALD aircraft decoys, two Tochka-U tactical missiles. ", 78 HIMARS, "Vampire" and "Hurricane" missiles, as well as 1278 drones.
47 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    April 19 2024 16: 10
    destroyed: three MiG-29 fighters and four An-26 military transport aircraft of the Ukrainian Air Force at the home airfield


    about “destroyed”, I would like to believe, of course...
    although there are a lot of holes in the pilots
    1. +3
      April 19 2024 16: 13
      THRALL. As I understand it, despite all the long-awaited positivity of this news, you propose to think specifically about the wording “destroyed.”
      Totally agree with you. hi
      1. +1
        April 19 2024 16: 28
        Apparently, this is not the first attack on this point. Two buildings nearby, which are still on Yandex maps, have already been destroyed in the video.
        1. -1
          April 21 2024 15: 48
          So they ferry planes between airfields every day, but this time they didn’t have time;)
      2. -1
        April 21 2024 15: 47
        A circle of young interpreters of the lexical meaning of words))) Well, let’s discuss when an assembly unit can be considered destroyed and when not)))
    2. -10
      April 19 2024 16: 17
      In the second story, they hit anywhere but Mig in the center. In the first, two ANs on the right and the left MiG were also not hit.
      1. +6
        April 19 2024 16: 29
        There is a fragmentation field there, be healthy, and a plane hit by shrapnel will not fly without repair, and after repair, the tank after the ATGM returns to service.
        1. +1
          April 19 2024 17: 33
          It's a shame there was no fire.
          And as for the fragments - after all, the cassettes are also detonated in the air above the ground.
      2. +6
        April 19 2024 16: 30
        Quote from solar
        In the second story, they hit anywhere but Mig in the center. In the first, two ANs on the right and the left MiG were also not hit.

        Just completely - didn’t get anywhere at all? When using cassettes, a direct hit is not necessary. How many submunitions does each cluster submunition “produce”? And what is their range of destruction in open areas?
        1. -4
          April 19 2024 17: 00
          So they would write - there is a possibility of defeat. But not
          destroyed: three MiG-29 fighters and four An-26 military transport aircraft of the Ukrainian Air Force at the home airfield

          They didn’t even consider the types of aircraft (this is not the An-26), what kind of confirmation of destruction or at least defeat can we talk about?
          1. -1
            April 21 2024 15: 50
            People like you, Foma, are the same as writing. Smart people wrote to you in the comments that these planes are only suitable for straining noodles)))
      3. +3
        April 19 2024 17: 21
        Quote from solar
        In the second story, they hit anywhere except Mig in the center

        Cluster munitions are good precisely because they do not have to hit the target exactly - they simply turn everything in the affected area into a sieve.
        1. 0
          April 19 2024 19: 03
          Cluster munitions are good because they cover an area and thereby increase the likelihood of hitting a target. Whether it’s a sieve or not, how it turns out.
          1. +1
            April 19 2024 19: 05
            Quote from solar
            Cluster munitions are good because they cover an area and thereby increase the likelihood of hitting a target

            And how does this disprove what I said?
            1. -2
              April 19 2024 19: 48
              Whether it’s a sieve or not, how it turns out.
              1. +3
                April 19 2024 20: 09
                Quote from solar
                we'll see how it goes

                If the target falls into the affected area, it becomes a sieve. If the sieve fails, it means the target did not hit the affected area. An accurate hit on the target is not necessary.
                What's wrong? Besides the fact that you whine and suffer on all topics...
                1. -3
                  April 19 2024 21: 23
                  If the target falls into the affected area, it becomes a sieve.

                  Exactly. And what is the destruction range of a submunition, for example, 2,5 kg and with what probability? It is clearly visible that they lay unevenly.
                  hi
                  1. 0
                    April 20 2024 10: 13
                    Quote from solar
                    And what is the destruction range of a submunition, for example, 2,5 kg and with what probability

                    Sorry, if you have no idea about the capabilities of cluster munitions, then on what basis do you draw the conclusion that the target is not hit?
      4. -1
        April 20 2024 00: 31
        Quote from solar
        ...just not along Mig in the center.
        Come on ..?! what
        if you track all messages from the Russian Ministry of Defense (including Konashenko), then the number of MiG-29s in Ukraine, already destroyed "six times at least!!!", from the beginning of the SVO, and their numbers at the beginning of the SVO ...
        wink
        there's a hike are already destroying “secondary and tertiary”, their halographic copies !!!
        Many people warned that in the era of AI and neural networks, everything would not be so simple... winked
        1. -2
          April 21 2024 16: 12
          Don’t embarrass yourself, look at how many planes were produced in the USSR. Think carefully and then write ;)
    3. -2
      April 19 2024 16: 20
      although there are a lot of holes in the pilots
      The question is how many times have holes been made in them like this before, and how many times they will do it again.
    4. +2
      April 19 2024 16: 22
      Just because they didn't burn out doesn't mean they can take off. Apparently, the ducks were well stuffed.
      Moreover, damage to the casing is not the most problematic for these birds. They also spoiled the filling. And this is much more critical.
      It’s strange that they stood openly.
      Or layouts.
    5. +2
      April 19 2024 16: 52
      Quote: Thrall
      about “destroyed”, I would like to believe, of course...
      although there are a lot of holes in the pilots

      The title of the article is written more correctly
      MO: Three MiG-29 fighters and four An-26 military transport aircraft of the Armed Forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine amazed missile strike at home airfield
    6. -2
      April 21 2024 15: 44
      Go check it out, especially judging by the intonation - it’s on your side.
  2. -14
    April 19 2024 16: 11
    Were there no cigarette cases or suede jackets in these MiG-29s? Disorder.
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. -1
    April 19 2024 16: 19
    There is no evidence of destruction. The planes are seen to be in the affected area, but there are no piles of debris, bright fires or other signs of destruction. Still, there is a difference between damaged, damaged and destroyed.
    1. +3
      April 19 2024 16: 33
      Quote: puskarinkis
      Still, there is a difference between damaged, affected and destroyed

      If an aircraft cannot be repaired and is scrapped, can it be considered destroyed?
    2. +4
      April 19 2024 17: 39
      Quote: puskarinkis
      There is no evidence of destruction. The planes are seen to be in the affected area, but there are no piles of debris, bright fires or other signs of destruction.

      Can you imagine how much electrical and radio equipment is installed on the plane, and how much mechanics is used to control the landing gear, ailerons, flaps, rudder and other equipment? And there are wiring harnesses all over the fuselage, providing communication between individual units of equipment, control panels and electrical mechanisms (you can believe that even one fairly thick harness, broken in only one place, is already a huge hemorrhoid for repairmen), and tens of meters of hydraulic pipelines and many more what's different? Not to mention the holes in the trim and broken glass in the cabins. And what to do if all this is cut or distorted by many destructive elements of cluster munitions? In my opinion, this result is quite comparable to a “pile of rubble.”
      1. +1
        April 19 2024 18: 04
        I can perfectly imagine what one well-placed fragment or bullet can do! I can even imagine what a screwdriver forgotten by a TsARM mechanic can do. But I urge you to be more careful in your assessments! Do you have confirmation that at least one submunition hit the target? Not an assumption and probability, but a real confirmation! Therefore, it is worth saying that the planes were damaged or hit (entered the affected area), and not destroyed.
    3. -1
      April 21 2024 16: 19
      Lyokha, the “honest Bandera” channel reports: “7 Iskanders were shot down on approach from anti-aircraft mobile guns. The remaining half of the Iskander crashed against the Mig-29, modernized by the highest arrogant Saxons. The flyers jumped on the flyers and launched a counterattack with five NURs, destroying more than 30 targets. Khokhlam sala ". Write to the editor, they will answer you in more detail about the fires and debris.
  5. +3
    April 19 2024 16: 24
    Again, it's unclear. Even when shooting from a pistol, several shots are fired to completely defeat the enemy. Why are strikes carried out in such a measured manner on targets that are already clearly important and targeted? Maybe the rocket artillerymen will answer my question?
  6. +6
    April 19 2024 16: 25
    I didn’t find the An-26 in the video ((((Next to the MiGs there are four Yak-40s. Are they An-26s?
    1. +1
      April 19 2024 16: 31
      I didn’t see any ANs either. I have never seen the overhead stabilizer on the AN, and the engines are on the tail.
  7. -2
    April 19 2024 16: 27
    The list is very long, if there are similar losses almost every week and there are still so many...?
    Well done both reconnaissance and destroyers, but it doesn’t feel like the enemy has wavered...
  8. 0
    April 19 2024 16: 33
    Quote: Amur_Tiger
    four Yak-40

    On the Yak-40, the wings are more shifted along the fuselage towards the stern and the wing sweep is significant, but here the wing is almost in the center and there is an absolute lack of sweep.
    1. +2
      April 19 2024 16: 42
      Well, that means these are different Yak-40s wink
    2. -2
      April 19 2024 19: 50
      Swept - on the Yak-42.
  9. +4
    April 19 2024 16: 43
    Quote from solar
    In the second story, they hit anywhere except Mig in the center

    I would not advise you to stay near this MiG. Each such explosion is a scattering of shrapnel in all directions, so I assure you that the colander turned out to be a good one. But it is far from a fact that the planes were in working order before their arrival.
    1. -1
      April 19 2024 20: 19
      So placing an airplane in the center can only be used as bait to attack the enemy.
      Real planes are immediately placed in camouflaged shelters.
  10. +1
    April 19 2024 16: 46
    Quote: Thrall
    Well, that means these are different Yak-40s

    I admit my mistake, I haven’t seen them for a long time, my memory is failing me.
  11. +4
    April 19 2024 17: 02
    Voevoda just wrote in Telegram: “According to information from the field, 2 of the three MiGs in Dnepropetrovsk are being scrapped. The third will be dragged for repairs.”
    Very very good! Maybe the third one won’t be very volatile... lol
  12. +2
    April 19 2024 18: 17
    Hey, writer, ask what the An-26 looks like.
  13. -1
    April 19 2024 20: 47
    ..air defense systems shot down .. four MALD airborne decoys in a week..

    Just wondering - should this really be included as an asset? After all, anti-aircraft missiles were spent on a fake target..
  14. -1
    April 19 2024 22: 43
    There are 4 x Yak-40 standing in the middle of the field in the video.
  15. -1
    April 19 2024 23: 02
    Quote: Amur_Tiger
    I didn’t find the An-26 in the video ((((Next to the MiGs there are four Yak-40s. Are they An-26s?

    Question on the exam for C students: is it still An26 or B52?
  16. -1
    April 21 2024 15: 26
    If we bring together all the Ukrainian aircraft destroyed in 2 years, it turns out that more equipment has already been destroyed than in the European countries combined, and soon there will be more than in the USA. After some time, more than in all countries of the world, and then ..only the Galaxy is ahead. That’s how it is, Mi... sorry Evgenich (Igor Evgenievich Konashenkov) it turns out...
    1. -1
      April 21 2024 16: 24
      Fuck... sorry Yura, if you don’t have access to sites or your religion doesn’t allow it, don’t think that others can’t check your words.