Israel and Iran – show in the Middle East

42
Israel and Iran – show in the Middle East


"True Promise"


Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps commander Hossein Salami called the overnight strikes on Israel “successful.” Moreover, the Iranians initially expected a smaller effect. I wonder which one? To the total destruction of everyone drones, cruise and ballistic missiles are still approaching their targets?



Israel, in turn, reported the failure of Iran's Operation True Promise and the destruction of 99 percent of all ammunition in the air. On this, in fact, they parted ways - the Iranians announced the end of the action, and Israel opened its airspace. It was as if nothing had happened.

One could have ignored the event altogether if not for a few nuances.


Commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Hossein Salami

First of all, Iran for the first time openly and directly attacked Israeli territory, and quite massively. Cruise and ballistic missiles and kamikaze drones flew.

This is not the first time the Jewish state has been hit by ballistic missiles. The Syrians became pioneers in 1973, when they launched 16 Luna-M missiles and even hit several times. For example, to the Ramat David airbase, where a local air force pilot died. But at that time Israel did not yet have nuclear weapons. weapons, and if it was present, then in completely symbolic quantities.

On April 14, 2024, the territory of the Jewish state came under attack not from Iran’s numerous proxies, but directly from the territory of the Islamic Republic. This actually happened for the first time in stories.


According to representatives of the General Staff of the Iranian Armed Forces, the target for missiles and drones became a certain information center directly involved in the attack on the Iranian consulate in Damascus a week ago. The second target was the Nevastim airbase with several fighter and military transport squadrons. aviation.

The scale of destruction at these facilities is still unclear, but given the density and quality of Israel’s air defense, one wave of missiles from Iran will not be enough. It took several days to process the IDF defenses - the number of interceptor missiles was finite.

From official Israeli sources it is known that “Iran hoped to disable the base and thus weaken our air capabilities, but it did not succeed. Israeli Air Force aircraft continue to take off and land at the base, carrying out offensive and defensive missions.”

The second important nuance is that wars do not start this way, as Iran tried to portray. Israel gave Tehran a loud slap in the face by attacking the Iranian diplomatic embassy in Damascus. The Iranian government has been preparing the Israelis and the world community for the “True Promise” for a long time and even a little boringly. You shouldn’t be surprised if the IRGC “accidentally” revealed the details of the operation to its opponents so that they had time to prepare better.

All these are acts of one big ritual show in which Israel and Iran are trying to save face. Otherwise, people in the Middle East will not understand and will no longer respect you. Jerusalem is taking revenge for the Gaza Strip, the Houthis and Hezbollah, and Tehran is taking revenge for the embassy in Damascus.

It’s worth asking the Hamas terrorists about how wars really start. In October last year, they carried out an exemplary and at the same time very secretive operation at the initial stage on Israeli territory. Insanely bloody, but extremely effective. And Iran barely had time to warn through all channels about an imminent attack.

At the same time, neither side of the conflict is ready for a real war. An exchange of missile strikes does not mean a real war, and fighting with ground forces is not easy.

The lack of common borders significantly limits freedom of maneuver, especially for the IDF. Israel must somehow make its way through Iraq just to reach the borders of Iran.

Let us repeat, a modern war cannot be considered complete if infantry units do not take part in it. Until the soldier's boot is firmly established in enemy territory, all rocket fire can be considered bloody, but childish.

For Iran, by the way, it is much easier - Syria, Iraq and Lebanon will be happy to allow the IRGC expeditionary force through their territory. But how much of it will remain in the end, given the current level of intelligence and information support for Israel from the United States?

What's next?


A missile strike on Israeli territory is, whatever one may say, a slap in the face to Jerusalem. Even though it was predicted and successfully repelled, it was still a slap in the face. You will have to answer, otherwise others will not understand. First of all, Saudi Arabia, which is still looking at events somewhat distantly.

What is now in the minds of IDF military leaders is hardly predictable, but the White House has already had its say. Biden really doesn't need war right now. He would be happy to nail down the Islamic Republic, but not now. Before the elections, becoming a sponsor of another hot spot with unclear prospects is like political suicide. Therefore, if the IDF’s watchdog is unleashed on Tehran, it will be only after November 2024.

Israel's response will be strictly symbolic. They will take several F-16s into the air and limit themselves to attacks on Iranian infrastructure. Maybe even on the territory of Syria or Iraq. Of course, there will be casualties, but even in this case, Tehran will not escalate.

But the chances of error for Jerusalem remain quite large. First of all, this is causing serious damage to Iran's nuclear facilities. This is where the very red lines lie, after which a new war in the Middle East will be inevitable.

Now it is much more important for Tehran to get a nuclear bomb and then start a war with Israel, and not vice versa. Once the nuclear factor is devalued by Israeli missiles and bombs, the IRGC will not be held back by anything.

There is a second potential Israeli mistake. This is the opening of a second front against Hezbollah in Lebanon. If we can’t reach the Iranians directly, then at least we’ll smear their proxies, which are literally nearby. Only the war in the north will be bloody and largely meaningless. Just like now in the Gaza Strip.


Iran has much more room for maneuver in this story. For example, supply the Houthis with their Shaheds and seal the Bab el-Mandeb Strait forever. For several months now, the coalition against Yemen has been unable to do anything about the Houthis’ predatory attacks on cargo ships in the Red Sea. “Shaheds” will greatly increase the capabilities of the partisans, while at the same time making them almost invulnerable.

And there are no fewer such pain points for the collective West in the Middle East. But not only in this region.

An attack on Israel will once again have a bad impact on Ukraine. The White House has already called the IDF's response to the raid second to none, which sounds like praise and a promise of quick money. The point is a package of multi-billion dollar aid to Israel, which Democrats have been unable to push through Congress for several months.

61 billion for Ukraine are anchored to it. But the Kiev regime, in the eyes of the American establishment, has been considered a loser since last summer; the Yankees do not like such people and will not share money. Another thing is the Jews, who were able to “unsurpassedly” repel Iran’s carefully planned and coordinated retaliation. Washington has already voiced a proposal to coordinate funding for Israel as quickly as possible.

A few more of these raids and the IDF will run out of Iron Shield and Patriot missiles. We are not talking about Ukraine in this case, and in the event of a positive decision, Netanyahu will receive assistance without agreeing on billions for the Kyiv regime. If this happens, then the most elusive hopes for funding the Armed Forces of Ukraine from the pockets of American taxpayers will fall to dust.

And this is perhaps the most positive thing that can be learned from the show put on by Iran and Israel in the Middle East region.
42 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    April 16 2024 05: 27
    It seems that the author of Solovyov has seen enough and let’s write
    1. +5
      April 16 2024 06: 27
      It seems that the author not only did not look at the news, but also at the world map.
      Who shot down Iranian missiles that were flying towards Israel? Aren't Jordan, for example, Arabs? What did Saudi Arabia or Egypt do?

      But the chances of error for Jerusalem remain quite large. First of all, this is causing serious damage to Iran's nuclear facilities. This is where the very red lines lie, after which a new war in the Middle East will be inevitable.

      Hmm, what will this war look like? Iran will rush into a tank race against Israel?

      But we must admit that the author is right about one thing: Fordo in Iran is the most obvious target. Especially considering the fate of the Syrian or Iraqi reactors.
      And Hezbollah in Lebanon is also an open question; refugees from the north in Israel will not be kept in hotels for long.
      1. +2
        April 16 2024 07: 38
        The shame of human civilization is religious wars in the 20s of the 21st century!
        1. +1
          April 17 2024 00: 30
          It's a disgrace to human civilization - wars in general in the 21st century!
    2. +4
      April 16 2024 11: 13
      Quote: 77alex77
      It seems that the author of Solovyov has seen enough and let’s write

      This is a Jewish article translated into Russian. An excerpt from the article is that “Iran hoped to disable the base and thus weaken our air capabilities, but it failed.” Israel must be destroyed, and it strives for this. hi
  2. +12
    April 16 2024 06: 02
    Iran had practically no choice; if you launch an attack on the embassy, ​​they will be considered weak and the pressure will increase; if you attack seriously, there is a risk of escalation and involvement of the United States, for which they are apparently not ready. Hence the show's relatively symbolic attack.
  3. +4
    April 16 2024 06: 05
    Israel and Iran – show in the Middle East
    I agree that the events of April 14 really look like a “spectacle”... Warn your enemy in advance about the time of the strike and not bring the strike itself to its logical conclusion, stopping it at the first stage... If it were not for the monstrous costs of both sides, then one could call it “a cheap, bad operetta...”
    As a result, it turns out that the score is still in favor of Israel, and almost to a dry score. You just need to remember how many Iranian scientists, officers and generals of the IRGC, as well as various pro-Iranian Leaders, were destroyed over the past two or three years by Mossad agents and IDF strikes...
    1. 0
      April 16 2024 06: 58
      Quote: svp67
      As a result, it turns out that the score is still in favor of Israel, and almost to a dry score.

      I won’t go public with you here (IMHO). To strike the consulate of a “neutral” state (de jure the territory of the consulate is the territory of Iran) on the territory of the “enemy” state and receive in response a massive strike (and it is massive, not 1-2 missiles arrived) on YOUR territory, that’s what it is.. .
      1. 0
        April 16 2024 07: 48
        Quote: Adrey
        I won’t go public with you here (IMHO).

        You evaluate the scale of the strikes, and I evaluate their results... Israel achieves 100% lethality and success with one or two missiles, but Iran does not show such effectiveness, inflicting even group (on US bases) or even massive (on Israeli territory) attacks. Since he warns his opponents about them IN ADVANCE...
        The IRGC has many well-trained SOF fighters, they could be used to eliminate some “important people”, then it would really be head to head
        1. +6
          April 16 2024 08: 03
          Quote: svp67
          You assess the scale of the attacks, and I evaluate their results...

          You and I just evaluate the results differently. laughing.
          You are in human rockets, and I am in the context of influencing world politics laughing hi
    2. +4
      April 16 2024 12: 35
      ...the events of April 14 really look like a “performance”

      It seems that Iran set other goals: 1. got rid of “junk”; 2. opened the air defense system (the “Shaheds” were not flying above the ground to bypass the air defense, but high, so that the Israeli air defense would “peck” at them, and other missiles flew along a ballistic trajectory for the same purpose); 3. reduced Israel's stock of air defense missiles (by more than $1 billion); 4. trained his crews in combat work; 5. worked out logistics; 6. worked out the tactics of using missiles; 7. studied friends and enemies (Jordan - who is she?); 8. studied the Israeli air defense capabilities; 9. practiced strategic camouflage, etc. Therefore, Iran claims that the next attack on Israel will be of a different quality. Underestimating the capabilities of Iran for “proud” Jews will force them to repeat the story of fleeing the promised lands, but on a different level.
  4. +4
    April 16 2024 06: 42
    Show, show, is Syria supposedly an ally of Russia? Or not anymore? Israel shells Syrian territory with impunity, no matter what objects, and Russia cannot ensure the security of its ally with air defense systems?
    1. -4
      April 16 2024 07: 04
      Quote: parusnik
      Show, show, is Syria supposedly an ally of Russia?

      Where is such a union legally recorded?
      And honestly, why the hell do we need such allies? It’s like the Italians were once a big headache for the Reich. The territory of Syria is interesting to us to a certain extent; a MILITARY alliance with Syria is unlikely.
      1. +13
        April 16 2024 07: 29
        And honestly, why the hell do we need such allies?
        And what about Russian military bases in Syria? Syria supported the referendum in Crimea, Russia’s Northern Military District against Ukraine, and in August 2008 it supported the actions of Russian troops in Georgia. Syria recognized the independence of the DPR and LPR. True, for good measure, why the hell do we need such allies? If the union state of Belarus, where all this is legally formalized by the agreement on the creation of a union state of Russia and Belarus, did not recognize the majority of the above?
        1. -3
          April 16 2024 07: 40
          Quote: parusnik
          What about Russian military bases in Syria?

          Quote: Adrey
          The territory of Syria is interesting to us to a certain extent


          Quote: parusnik
          Syria supported the referendum in Crimea, Russia's North Military District against Ukraine, and in August 2008 it supported the actions of Russian troops in Georgia. Syria recognized the independence of the DPR and LPR.

          Well, who got “hot or cold” from this besides us?
          "The Pope? How many divisions does he have?"

          It was not for nothing that I brought up the WWII analogy. Often military an alliance with a stronger state pushes a weak ally to make adventurous decisions in the hope of help from its “big brother.” And we should not forget that formally Syria is in a state of war with Israel, and with the loss of part of its territory.
          1. +6
            April 16 2024 07: 53
            Name a friend of Russia who has many divisions and Russia kisses his gums?
            And don’t forget that formally Syria is at war with Israel
            Yes, Israel, it is not recommended to offend, it is so successful in distributing its citizenship to Russians, creating an alternate airfield for them, like for Chubais, for example, and the others. smile
            1. -3
              April 16 2024 08: 08
              Quote: parusnik
              Name a friend of Russia who has many divisions and Russia kisses his gums?

              I stated somewhere that we have a “queuing outside the fence” to become allies? But this is still not a reason to “recruit based on an advertisement.”
              Quote: parusnik
              Yes, Israel, it is not recommended to offend, it is so successful in distributing its citizenship to Russians, creating an alternate airfield for them, like for Chubais, for example, and the others.

              This has nothing to do with the topic of our discussion request
              1. +5
                April 16 2024 08: 20
                I stated somewhere that we have a “queue outside the fence”
                There is no queue and there is no intention of lining up. You need to be content with what you have, and not then slap yourself on the cheeks with your ears, saying that we don’t keep what we have, but having lost it, we cry. Whine, whine... smearing the tears with our fists.
                has absolutely nothing to do with the topic of our discussion
                It has, it has...Especially when assets are invested in the Israeli economy, and if relations worsen, they can be taken away.
                1. -3
                  April 16 2024 08: 30
                  Quote: parusnik
                  You need to be content with what you have, and not then slap yourself on the cheeks with your ears, saying that we don’t keep what we have, but when we lose it, we cry.

                  Didn’t you, at one time, sarcastically talk about the topic of establishing relations with the Taliban (an organization banned in Russia (at least for now))? Did I understand you correctly that we should be content with THIS too? Whatever the situation the country is in, one must be selective and pragmatic in choosing allies.
                  1. +6
                    April 16 2024 08: 46
                    Excuse me, but what’s wrong with my snide comment with the Taliban? Did he cut you in the heart? When choosing Syria, Russia showed indiscriminateness? And in relations with Afghanistan, Russia is trying to pick up what is so far lying badly, so that others wouldn’t pick up They managed to do it. But it’s unlikely that he’ll pick it up. You’re trying to convince me that Russia needs to ditch Syria, to put it in your words, why the hell do we have such allies? And what other allies does Russia not need?
                    1. -3
                      April 16 2024 09: 15
                      Quote: parusnik
                      Are you trying to convince me that Russia needs to abandon Syria, to put it in your words, why the hell do we have such allies?

                      What is the "kid"? Why don’t we defend their territory as if it were our own? So enough is enough for them that they retained their statehood only thanks to us and Iran. Sami-sami further, at least a little. And then, when others do your work for you, you know, it’s somewhat “dampening”.
                      Quote: parusnik
                      Excuse me, but what’s wrong with my malicious comment about the Taliban? Did it cut you in the heart?

                      I'm not that emotional laughing. It’s just a little strange - some, although they are admirers of Sharia law, are nevertheless, to a certain extent, subjects of politics, You don't like it (at least then).
                      Quote: parusnik
                      And in relations with Afghanistan, Russia is trying to pick up what is currently lying badly, so that others don’t have time to pick it up.

                      I agree, quite pragmatic. The Chinese are also going there, but they are doing it quietly, without attracting unnecessary attention, unlike us.
                      Quote: parusnik
                      be content with what you have

                      Now, apparently, we should think about such an alliance?
                      But to the obvious object of politics - Syria, according to you, we should show just “brotherly love” and self-sacrifice.
                      Irrational approach in my opinion hi
                      1. +2
                        April 16 2024 10: 09
                        Irrational approach in my opinion
                        What you are going to convince me of is called the sailor and abandoned, and then on her own, herself. “We are responsible for those we tamed” (c) But, alas, you don’t understand this. hi
                      2. +3
                        April 16 2024 10: 54
                        Quote: parusnik
                        What you are going to convince me of is called the sailor and abandoned, and then she herself, herself. “We are responsible for those we have tamed” (c)

                        There is some truth in your words. But the “allies” should not forget about their direct responsibilities to protect their territory. There have always been plenty of people who like to “sit on your neck and dangle your legs” in relation to us.
                        To sum it up:
                        The territory and resources of Afghanistan are interesting to us. Alliance with the Afghan government as subject of politics and real force in the region interesting, but impossible for political reasons.
                        The territory of Syria is interesting to us. A full union with Syria is not interesting due to the objective political status of this state and his complete lack of real strength and influence in the region.
                        Real alliances, with all the resulting relationships and obligations, are possible only between subjects of world politics. In all other cases, there is always a beneficiary and, as a rule, this is the subject country (although there are exceptions).
                        The population of the country always pays for the lack of pragmatism in foreign policy to one degree or another, sometimes with the lives of its citizens.
                      3. +1
                        April 16 2024 11: 12
                        I repeat: “We are responsible for those we have tamed” (c) But you don’t understand this from the word at all. Or you don’t want to understand. hi By the way, in the USA they understand this very well.
    2. -1
      April 16 2024 07: 51
      Quote: parusnik
      Israel shells the territory of Syria with impunity, no matter what objects, and Russia cannot ensure the security of its ally with air defense systems?

      Our leadership here is very careful and tries to show neutrality. Officially, Syria is in a state of war with Israel; if we were to get involved in this conflict now, we would get an Israeli response in Ukraine... So we are maneuvering
      1. +6
        April 16 2024 07: 58
        Syria is at war with Israel,
        And that’s why we can’t supply the appropriate weapons to ensure Syria’s air defense?
        we will get an Israeli response in Ukraine.
        Which one, for example? Will Chubais be deprived of Israeli citizenship and returned back to Russia?
        1. +2
          April 16 2024 11: 43
          Quote: parusnik
          Will Chubais be deprived of Israeli citizenship and returned back to Russia?

          Together with Alla Borisovna. laughing
          1. +6
            April 16 2024 11: 58
            When they write about Israel’s response in Ukraine, it’s funny to read, that’s why the answers are funny. Many people here have begun to forget the not-so-distant past, for example, when Israel supported Chechen militants during the Chechen wars, and Russia, despite this, jumped into arms with the words: “Izya, I am yours, forever." Israel's answer is the main thing: it opposes Russia's military defense in Ukraine. Israel, having occupied Arab territories, considering them its own, does not recognize Crimea and the rest of the annexed regions as Russian. What other answers can we expect from Israel? Arms supplies ?They supply it anyway.
            1. +3
              April 16 2024 17: 14
              “What other answers can we expect from Israel?” - those that terrify our “successful” citizens - financial answers. These citizens are not afraid of the supply of weapons, because... it doesn't shoot at them. But the cruel blow to the financial well-being of them and their “relatives” in the West scares them out of their minds. And therefore, completely respecting and taking into account the influence of the “Israeli” lobby in the West, they behave in such a way as not to greatly anger these “comrades.”
              1. +4
                April 16 2024 17: 20
                I completely agree, a commentator wrote something similar Adrey(Andrey),
                namely: it has absolutely nothing to do with the topic of our discussion

                It has, it has...Especially when assets are invested in the Israeli economy, and if relations worsen, they can be taken away.
                1. +2
                  April 16 2024 17: 29
                  You are 100% right. hi And these assets are the very insurmountable obstacle to the “good conclusion” of the whole action. A specie conquers everyone and everything.
    3. +3
      April 16 2024 09: 41
      How can Russian air defense provide protection for Syria if it cannot provide protection for its territories?
      1. +7
        April 16 2024 10: 16
        How Russian air defense can protect Syria
        The strikes have not been carried out on Syria since February 2022. “Take hold of the tug, don’t say it’s not strong” (c) Maintain your authority. If you can’t, at least don’t shout from all your household appliances, at least about the fact that the Russian economy first in Europe and fifth in the world
    4. +1
      April 17 2024 09: 51
      Russia cannot ensure the security of its own territory with air defense forces, and you are talking about Syria. We believed our own beautiful pictures and bit off more than we could chew and eat.
      1. +1
        April 17 2024 17: 41
        Everything is much worse with Syria than ensuring its security by air defense forces... It’s just that everyone’s hats are flying...
  5. +2
    April 16 2024 07: 23
    One day they will burn completely and the whole region will burn there, but not now
  6. +2
    April 16 2024 10: 55
    Show? What, did the author hope for war? Why do some people want to destroy life on Earth so much?
  7. +3
    April 16 2024 14: 40
    The Iranian government spent a long time, and even a little boringly, preparing the Israelis and the world community for the “True Promise.” You shouldn’t be surprised if the IRGC “accidentally” revealed the details of the operation to its opponents so that they had time to prepare better.

    100%. Just like Iran took revenge on the United States by striking its base.
    Warning the US about the strike time and target.
    The Americans calmly walked into the shelter, the Iranians shot back, and even damaged or destroyed something there.
    The Americans calmly left the shelter, fixed what was broken and continued to work.

    A great way to save face. Of course, you won’t achieve any military goals this way.
    Yes, it wasn’t necessary here.
    But we got some cool photos of missiles over Israel. Iranians can now put very patriotic screensavers on their phones :)
    1. 0
      April 17 2024 01: 34
      Quote: Denis812
      100%. Just like Iran took revenge on the United States by striking its base.
      Warning the US about the strike time and target.
      The Americans calmly walked into the shelter, the Iranians shot back, and even damaged or destroyed something there.
      The Americans calmly left the shelter, fixed what was broken, and continued to work.

      All of you mocking Iran, can you please tell me why the hell Iran's enemy should care about Iran saving face and not only saving face but doing it at the expense of the US losing face?
      Do you think that when Iran confiscated US oil in retaliation to the US, but Iran confiscated a double amount of oil seized by the US, that was to save face too? Was that done through coordination as well?
      Or when Iran shoots down the most expensive drone on the planet. Was Iran saving face or Trump, who said I stopped the attack because I didn't want to kill Iranians while they only destroyed a drone? Since when did the US become so humanitarian? Which one was actually saving face?
      If that is so, then why is it that Russia can't arrange similar save-face shows?
      for example, when US seized your tanker with the help of Greeks, you did nothing but iran in contrast to you seized two Greek ships with US-bound oil as their cargo?" Why? Because although the tanker and crews were Russian some of its cargo was Iranian, Iran didn't need to save face because no one knew that some of the cargo was Iranian, but nevertheless, Iran seized two Greek tankers that were both carrying US oil. The Greek foreign minister said to Iranian repesentative that what you did. was like we mistakingly slapped you, and you in return killed our entire family.
      But what did Russia do to save face? Nothing
      When Americans in Syria killed Russian troops, did Russia dare to attack US bases like Iran did to save face ? No
      Why, then, does it seem that everyone only lets Iran save face by attacking them?
      Isn't it more likely that it's the other way around, and the ones that are saving face are the US and Israel, who justify their lack of response to Iran's attacks by declaring Iran's operations failed?
      And people like you who don't want to admit there is someone with more bravery and self-respect than you who won't allow disrespect, willingly believe whatever narrative the US and Israel are giving you instead of accepting the obvious Iran attacked them, and to save face, say no one died.
      Why is there no evidence given by Israel for so-called light damage?
      We already know for the fact that they are lying because they said not even one drone landed, yet there is video of at least four drones reaching their target in the same clip.
      1. 0
        April 17 2024 06: 52
        why the hell Iran's enemy should care about Iran saving face

        Because a big war in the East is not profitable for the States now. Oil prices will soar. And right before the elections. Does Biden need it? Of course not. And secondly, Biden does not need a flow of coffins to America before the elections. And if America does not fit in, then it is not at all a fact that Israel will win the war. And with the USA, it is not a fact that the Jews will win it.

        why is it that Russia can't arrange similar save-face shows?

        What for? Russia feels quite confident now.
        After 2022, the EU even INCREASED gas purchases from the Russian Federation. Liquefied.
        India has become a very large supplier of oil and refined products to the EU. Who supplies oil to India? Oh. This is Russia.
        Russia generally sells more gas and oil and grain and other things in terms of revenue after the start of the conflict. Our GDP, even according to the World Bank and the UN, is growing faster than in the USA or EU countries.

        When Americans in Syria killed Russian troops, did Russia dare to attack US bases like Iran did to save face ? No

        America in Syria attacked a group of a private military company, and not soldiers of the Russian army.
        Right now in Ukraine, the Russian Armed Forces are constantly killing mercenaries from Poland, the USA, Canada and other countries. I don’t hear any indignation from the governments of these countries. Why? Yes, because these are MERCENARIES, not military personnel.

        Why is there no evidence given by Israel for so-called light damage?

        how is it not? The Israelis showed a video of their F-35 landing at an air base next to which there are craters. It was all over the news. It’s unlikely that any CNN can calmly enter an air base and film a report. The Israelis gave permission to release the material.
  8. 0
    April 16 2024 16: 17
    The First World War began with a similar situation. And like Iran, in those days the Kingdom of Serbia acted as a sponsor of terrorism. And just like in our days, no one wanted a large-scale war, but what happened happened. And in the end, third forces turned out to be the winners, without expecting it, in Russia - the Bolsheviks, in the enemy camp - leftists, socialists. And everything smoothly escalated into the Second World War. So it's not that simple.
  9. +1
    April 16 2024 16: 34
    "about the destruction of 99 percent of all ammunition in the air..."
    When they warned three days in advance and when the United States and England came to the defense of Israel. Of course you can fight like that. Iran did this because it doesn't want a big war. But Israel did not strike the embassy just to have it end like this.