“Churchill and his friends are strikingly reminiscent in this respect of Hitler and his friends.”

25
“Churchill and his friends are strikingly reminiscent in this respect of Hitler and his friends.”
Churchill's speech


Course towards a unipolar world


In the spring of 1945, the USSR's allies in the anti-Hitler coalition began to make offensive gestures towards Moscow (Why did the Cold War start). So, on May 7, 1945, contrary to previous agreements, the Westerners recognized the surrender of Germany in Reims. At the insistence of Moscow, it was recognized as preliminary, and the procedure for unconditional surrender was repeated on the night of May 9 in the Berlin suburb of Karlshorst.



The Americans and British, trying to downgrade the events in Berlin, sent minor generals there. On May 8, British Prime Minister Winston Churchill and US President Harry Truman announced the signing of unconditional surrender and victory in Reims.

Soviet citizens learned about the signing of the surrender in Karlshorst from a message from the Sovinformburo on May 9, 1945 at 2:10 a.m. Moscow time. Announcer Yuri Levitan read out the Act of Military Surrender of Nazi Germany and the Decree of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR declaring May 9 a Victory Day.

The message was transmitted all night and then all day on May 9. On the evening of May 9, Joseph Stalin addressed the Soviet people, after which Levitan read out the order of the Supreme Commander-in-Chief about complete Victory over Nazi Germany and about an artillery salute today, May 9, at 22:XNUMX with thirty salvoes from a thousand guns.

The allies agreed to hold a joint Victory Parade in Berlin. According to the original agreement, the commanders-in-chief of the Allied forces in Germany were to attend the parade, but just before the parade, Montgomery, Eisenhower and Latre de Tassigny refused to participate, citing “excessive busyness.” The parade was held on September 7. The parade was hosted by Marshal Georgy Zhukov from the Soviet Union.

Moscow believed that such a “cooling” in relations was associated with the death of Roosevelt and the rise to power of the unfriendly Truman. However, this was not the case.

It was Roosevelt and his team who prudently prepared the Second World War (Origins of World War II: USA vs. All), pushed Germany and Japan to war. Roosevelt created the political base on which Truman relied. His team remained the same, formed under Roosevelt. But Truman acted more crudely, not as subtly as Roosevelt.

The Kremlin hoped that the contradictions would be smoothed out by the great struggle against Nazism and fascism, and that the great powers, as during the war, would coordinate actions and resolve controversial issues together. The Big Three will be retained.

But The Americans did not want any equal cooperation. They organized a world war to seize absolute power and create a unipolar world. Officially, this was presented as the creation of a “collective security” system under the auspices of the UN.

In his message to Congress on the Reorganization of the Armed Forces on December 19, 1945, President Truman stated bluntly:

“We must all recognize that the victory we have achieved has confronted the American people with a constant and pressing need to lead the world.”


Field Marshal Wilhelm Keitel, signing the Act of Unconditional Surrender of Germany on the German side, is presented with the text of the act. To the left, second from the viewer, sitting at the table is G.K. Zhukov, who signed the act on behalf of the USSR. May 8, 1945

Turkish Question


At the Potsdam Conference in July-August 1945, the Allies were still forced to concede to Stalin: on the borders of Poland (at Moscow’s suggestion they gave it vast areas of Germany); on the joint government of Germany; about reparations “in kind”, including part of the factory equipment and machine tools from the western zones of occupation, etc.

The United States needed the Russians to quickly defeat the Japanese Empire. The American military believed that without the participation of the USSR it would take another 1-2 years to fight the Japanese, and the human losses would be very high. The bill will run into millions.

At the same time, Moscow decided to remember the traditional issues for Russia - the Bosphorus and Dardanelles straits, the regions historical Georgia and Armenia, which were still part of Turkey.

On March 19, 1945, Moscow denounced the Soviet-Turkish treaty of December 25, 1925, after which informal consultations and negotiations began on concluding a new treaty. The Turkish side proposed a project according to which it guaranteed free passage of Soviet armed forces during the war.

The USSR wanted to punish Turkey for its hostile position during World War II (Why Stalin did not take Constantinople and the Black Sea Straits), when the Turks barely restrained themselves from entering the war on Hitler’s side, and Russia had to maintain a large group of troops on the Turkish border for almost the entire war and occupy Northern Iran.

Türkiye also economically supported the Third Reich for almost the entire war. The very conduct of the war by Germany was possible only thanks to the supply of chrome ore from Turkey. The German Minister of Armaments Speer admitted that if these supplies stopped, the entire military industry would begin to “starve” in six months, and would stop in a year. However, these supplies stopped only in August 1944, when advancing Russian troops blocked communications in the Balkans.

Therefore, in June 1945, Molotov, through the Turkish ambassador in Moscow, Sarper, announced that a regime of joint Soviet-Turkish control in the Black Sea straits with the deployment of a Soviet naval base and a correction of the Moscow Treaty of 1921, which Molotov called unfair for “the one offended in the territorial issue,” were needed. THE USSR.

The new border of the USSR and Turkey, from the Soviet point of view, should have roughly corresponded to the border of the Russian and Ottoman empires as of 1913: the illegally seized territories included the former Kars region, the south of the Batumi region, as well as the Surmalinsky district of the former Erivan province.

Thus, Moscow wanted to restore Russia’s positions in the Caucasus, which were undermined by the collapse of the Russian Empire. Receive the fruits of victory that Russia should have received after the First World War. And the issue of the regime of the Black Sea Straits has been painful for Russia for centuries. Stalin himself noted that Turkey, supported by England, “holds a large state by the throat and does not give it passage.”

Turkey blocked the Black Sea Fleet, and vice versa, opened the straits for our enemies, creating a threat during the Crimean War, the First World War, and the Civil War.

By June 22, 1945, Turkey rejected all proposals from the USSR, finding new patrons in the United States and England. At the Potsdam Conference, Molotov raised the issue of a fairer border with Turkey:

“...in 1921, Turkey seized territory from Soviet Armenia and Soviet Georgia - this is the well-known territory of the regions of Kars, Artvin and Ardahan. Therefore, I stated that in order to conclude a union treaty, it is necessary to resolve the issue of the territory seized from Georgia and Armenia, and return this territory back to them.”

Molotov also outlined the problem of the Black Sea Straits, adding:

“We have repeatedly stated to our allies that the USSR cannot consider the Convention concluded in Montreux correct.”

At the same time, for Molotov, the issue of the straits was more important than the new border. The Soviet side proposed revising the Montreux Convention and providing the USSR with a naval base in the straits.

The Western powers did not make concessions on the Turkish issue, but they promised to revise the Montreux Convention.


Potsdam Conference. The Soviet delegation, in the center sits the Chairman of the State Defense Committee of the USSR I.V. Stalin.

Fulton speech


As soon as Japan was defeated and occupied by the Americans, and the need for an alliance with the USSR disappeared, Westerners became more outspoken.

In October 1945, General Dwight Eisenhower's headquarters, on the orders of President Truman, developed the Totality plan. The Americans were ready to drop 20–30 nuclear bombs on 20 of the most important cities of the USSR.

The Totality plan headed a series of military plans subsequently developed by the US leadership for military operations with the USSR using nuclear weapons. weapons. In subsequent plans there were more and more strikes. The Americans hoped to use their superiority in nuclear weapons and strategic aviation (then the main carrier of nuclear weapons).

In October 1945, UN meetings opened. America tried to turn this body into a kind of world tribunal with the right to intervene in any contradictions between countries, resolving them in its own interests. The USSR could counteract this only with the right of “veto” in the key UN body - the Security Council.

On March 5, 1946, Winston Churchill delivered a famous speech at Westminster College in Fulton in the USA, which became the signal for the so-called. Cold war between the collective West with its allies and the USSR. In essence, it was the third world war. However, the West could not openly attack the USSR, fearing its enormous military power. Therefore, military operations took place on the territory of other countries (Korea, Vietnam, etc.), on the political, diplomatic, information, cultural, scientific, technological and economic fronts.

Churchill called Russia the enemy of the West and called for the consolidation of all forces to fight it. The great Briton stated that from now on “the United States is at the pinnacle of world power.” That the only force that can stop new war and tyranny is the “fraternal association of English-speaking peoples.”

Churchill openly called the Soviet Union the cause of “international difficulties” and that the Russians had lowered the “iron curtain” in Europe. That the communist threat is growing in the world: “in a large number of countries far from the borders of Russia, communist “fifth columns” have been created throughout the world, which work in complete unity and absolute obedience in carrying out directives received from the communist center.”

Churchill was already an unofficial person, retired, so the British government did not bear responsibility for his words. But the speech was made in the presence of Truman and was widely covered in the world press. There were no denials or objections from either official Washington or London.

Moscow understood everything well. On March 14, Stalin, in an interview with Pravda, told the truth that was unpleasant for the West:

“...Mr. Churchill and his friends are strikingly reminiscent in this respect of Hitler and his friends.

Hitler began the cause of the outbreak of war by proclaiming racial theory, declaring that only people who speak German represent a full-fledged nation.

Mr. Churchill begins the war unleashing also with racial theory, arguing that only nations that speak English are full-fledged nations, destined to decide the fate of the whole world.

German racial theory led Hitler and his friends to the conclusion that the Germans, as the only fully-fledged nation, should dominate other nations.

The English racial theory leads Mr. Churchill and his friends to the conclusion that the nations speaking English, as the only ones of full value, must dominate the rest of the nations of the world.”

To be continued ...
25 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    26 January 2024 04: 54
    Lattre de Tassigny refused to participate, citing "excessive busyness"

    What was this “great French commander” doing? wink
    1. +7
      26 January 2024 05: 18
      Quote: Dutchman Michel
      what have you been doing?
      The same as the others.
      German racial theory

      English racial theory

      Racist theorists! Crap....
    2. +2
      26 January 2024 15: 25
      Both were:
      - self-taught, -
      - ardent nationalists, even Nazis
      extremely irreconcilable towards the opposition.
      Both were also involved in painting.
  2. +2
    26 January 2024 05: 11
    Correct article, we need to remind you how it all happened.
    Otherwise Roosevelt is good and Churchill is bad in the history books.
    The first killed its citizens (about 12 million, in Ukraine they like to post photos of the famine from the United States), and the rest built infrastructure in labor camps for food and without any rights.
    The second, with the help of Norway, plundered our resources in the White Sea and carried out raids and killed Pomors. Until the Belomor Canal was built and destroyers were sent across it, Europe did not allow it through the Baltic Sea. Also, this creature, in order to slow down the advance of the Japanese in Bengal, caused a famine. Millions of people died.
    1. -8
      26 January 2024 09: 04
      Quote: bya965
      The first one killed his citizens

      Khe khe.

      The “Roosevelt famine” was invented in Russian LiveJournal about 15 years ago. Although, of course, there are different opinions about the New Deal.
      Quote: bya965
      the rest for food and without any rights in labor camps to build infrastructure

      Khe khe.
      One could leave Roosevelt's "labor camp" at any time. Unlike the Soviet collective farm, let's say.
      Quote: bya965
      Until the Belomor Canal was built and destroyers were sent across it, Europe did not allow it through the Baltic Sea.

      Did you allow the battleship to be transferred, but not the EM? Very interesting.
      I didn't quite understand your point. Are you planning to fight Royal Navy with Soviet destroyers in the north?
      Quote: bya965
      Also, this creature, in order to slow down the advance of the Japanese in Bengal, caused a famine. Millions of people died.

      Yes, things didn't go well with the Bengals. However, no one considered them to be people, so these are minor things.
      Quote: bya965
      Otherwise Roosevelt is good and Churchill is bad in the history books.

      I don’t know what kind of history textbooks you have, but the Soviet ones had the effect of “good imperialists”. The British and Americans were bad all the way, but suddenly they became good for 4 years. A similar incident on the other hand, Comrade Stalin suddenly became a different person for 4 years, good Uncle Joe. And then suddenly the horns and hooves grew back.
      1. +7
        26 January 2024 09: 22
        Yes, the Russian enemies of the USSR were pro-Western for all 68 years under Soviet power, 6 years under your “Liberator” Gorbachev, 8 years under Yeltsin, more than 10 years under Putiya, and then suddenly they became “offended” by the enemies of the USSR in the West and suddenly became anti-Western.
        And enough of your anti-Soviet myths, including those about collective farms.
        If in the Republic of Ingushetia in 1913 only 15% of the population lived in cities, then in the USSR from 1926 to 1956 the urban population increased by 70 million people, which means that about 50 million peasants/collective farmers moved to live in cities.
        1. -6
          26 January 2024 15: 30
          Quote: tatra
          If in the Republic of Ingushetia in 1913 only 15% of the population lived in cities, then in the USSR from 1926 to 1956 the urban population increased by 70 million people, which means that about 50 million peasants/collective farmers moved to live in cities.

          Did you want to say that the Soviet Union converted collective farmers into workers when it built another plant somewhere? Yes, it happened.

          And why did you remember it?
          1. +4
            26 January 2024 18: 49
            What kind of nonsense is this? How could collective farms reassign collective farmers as workers? Whatever nonsense the enemies of the USSR and the Soviet people will come up with.
            1. -2
              26 January 2024 23: 35
              Quote: tatra
              What kind of nonsense is this? How could collective farms reassign collective farmers as workers?

              Khe khe.

              How could new workers get into the new plant? Who issued them a passport and on what grounds?
          2. +5
            26 January 2024 18: 49
            Quote: Negro
            Did you want to say that the Soviet Union converted collective farmers into workers when it built another plant somewhere? Yes, it happened.

            And why did you remember it?

            Well, how can I tell you? You love the Anglo-Saxons, so look how many of their people died during the resettlement from rural areas to cities in order to develop industry.
            Better in percentage.
            And continue to love your beloved Anglo-Saxon world. In principle, the Dutch and the Belgians and the Portuguese and the Spaniards, etc. can be included there for their attitude towards the colonies. But the Russians won't work. This is what makes you sick.
            1. -4
              26 January 2024 21: 38
              Quote: bya965
              how many of their people died during the migration from rural areas to cities in order to develop industry.

              In 20th century? I don't remember such statistics.

              Actually, the experiment is well-known: divide the country randomly between communists and any other ghouls in general and see how many people the communists can kill out of the blue. Fortunately, just in the 20s and 30s, there were many pieces of the former Republic of Ingushetia, where the Bolsheviks were shot at at one time. There is something to compare the achievements of Soviet power with.
              Quote: bya965
              And continue to love your beloved Anglo-Saxon world. In principle, the Dutch and the Belgians and the Portuguese and the Spaniards, etc. can be included there for their attitude towards the colonies.

              Uh, I have a hell of a lot to complain about the “Western world.”
              Quote: bya965
              But the Russians won't work.

              I agree, the population of Russia (under different names) is in a different league in this regard. Well, or it’s about 250 years behind: with the help of outstanding (no irony here) efforts, the authorities of the Republic of Ingushetia/USSR/RF manage to keep society at the level of their subjects around the middle of the XNUMXth century, until the idea of ​​a nation and a national state was realized during the French and American revolutions.
      2. +6
        26 January 2024 11: 48
        On the American famine. Census data is closed. Again, wild capitalism, look for what you and your children should eat. There were no food stamps (food stamps) or food banks back then.
        You could leave Roosevelt's "labor camp" at any time

        On what terms? The work there was very hard, they actually worked for food, why didn’t they run away with such freedom?
        Allowed to transfer the battleship
        What battleship are we talking about? Are you by any chance talking about Arkhangelsk? So the very first search on the Internet says that this is an Englishman who was given to ours to use in the order of offset from May 30, 1944 to January 15, 1949, and you write about the 30s.
        There are some materials online about the poaching of norgs in the White Sea; they knocked out everything that moved. True, everything is written there as a carbon copy, but there was something there.
        1. -2
          26 January 2024 15: 24
          Quote: Not the fighter
          Census data closed

          According to American censuses? Have you been banned from Google?
          Quote: Not the fighter
          There were no food stamps (food stamps) or food banks back then.

          Mercy for the translation.

          Find out what Herbert Hoover did later, the 31st President of the United States, in 1918-1923.
          Quote: Not the fighter
          On what conditions?

          Quite modest. This was practically an unemployment benefit, with the caveat that then, as a matter of principle, they did not pay money to people who did not work. Accordingly, they were used for the construction of infrastructure.
          Quote: Not the fighter
          What battleship are we talking about? Are you by any chance talking about Arkhangelsk?

          About Sevastopol, aka the "Paris Commune". He moved from the Baltic to the World Cup in 1929. Let me remind you that the big niggle (Military Alarm of 1927) happened just two years earlier.
          1. +1
            26 January 2024 18: 52
            Both the USSR and the USA had the same demographic failure of 8-10 million people in the 30s.
            1. -4
              26 January 2024 21: 45
              Quote: tatra
              Both the USSR and the USA had the same demographic failure of 8-10 million people in the 30s.

              There is no data at all for the USSR. By the way, the same applies to the population of the Russian Federation now. During the 30s, the US population grew by 9 million people. “Why not 20?” the great Lifestyle historians ask the world. This is the “Roosevelt famine”.
  3. +7
    26 January 2024 06: 27
    On May 7, 1954, contrary to previous agreements, the Westerners recognized the surrender of Germany in Reims.
    Please correct it to 1945...
  4. +2
    26 January 2024 11: 43
    Author ! In what year 1954, on May 7, the surrender of Germany was recognized. Cuckoo?
  5. +3
    26 January 2024 11: 48
    Again a stream of hackneyed cliches.
    The USSR wanted to punish Turkey for its hostile position during the Second World War (Why didn’t Stalin take Constantinople and the Black Sea Straits), when the Turks barely restrained themselves from entering the war on Hitler’s side, and Russia had to maintain a large group of troops on the Turkish border for almost the entire war and occupy Northern Iran.
    According to Samsonov, the USSR (and England too??) occupied Iran because of Turkey’s fears? Nonsense about vegetable oil!!! Which group? Author, what are you talking about?
    There were only two divisions that actually stood at “the very height of the Battle of Stalingrad” on the border with Turkey in the Armenian SSR (or in the Nakhichevan region of the Azerbaijan SSR) and in the Georgian SSR.
    1) 9th Mountain Rifle Division of incomplete strength. Why "incomplete staff". Because back in December 1941, the 251st Mountain Rifle Regiment and the second division of the 256th Artillery Regiment were transferred to the 51st Army of the North Caucasus Front, where they took part in the Kerch-Feodosia landing operation.
    In August 1942, the 121st Mountain Rifle Regiment, reassigned directly to the commander of the 46th Army, was transferred to the Sukhumi area and on August 27.08.1942, XNUMX entered the battle at the Klukhor Pass.
    And from November 26.11 to December 1.12.1942, XNUMX, all units of the division remaining in Georgia were transferred by sea to Tuapse.
    But the task of this division was to defend the Black Sea coast from a German landing in the area from the Soviet-Turkish border to Poti.
    2) 409th Infantry Division. But here's what's interesting.
    Combat periods of this division:
    from December 2, 1942 to March 29, 1943,
    from June 1 to July 23, 1943;
    from August 8, 1943 to May 11, 1945.

    That is, this 409th division, which actually spent almost the entire Battle of Stalingrad in Armenia, was not even part of the Active Army!!! But at the beginning of December 1942, she was reintroduced into the Active Army and sent to the front.
    Türkiye economically supported the Third Reich for almost the entire war. The very conduct of the war by Germany was possible only thanks to the supply of chrome ore from Turkey. The German Minister of Armaments Speer admitted that if these supplies stopped, the entire military industry would begin to “starve” in six months, and would stop in a year. However, these supplies stopped only in August 1944, when advancing Russian troops blocked communications in the Balkans.

    Chromium ore was supplied to Germany in the period from March 15, 1943 (forty-third) years to April 1944.
  6. +4
    26 January 2024 11: 56
    In the spring of 1945, the USSR's allies in the anti-Hitler coalition began to make offensive gestures towards Moscow

    That is why the USSR did not want a war with Germany and its defeat.
    I have a reasonable assumption that the top of Germany also did not want the destruction and unconditional surrender of their Reich.
    A classic example of the mistaken calculation of its leader (Führer) with the obvious assistance of British agents from the Abwehr leadership.
  7. +3
    26 January 2024 12: 03
    All the leaders of the Anglo-Saxon world represent Nazism and colonialism. This is their original essence. But there is a difference between individuals. Roosevelt, Kennedy, Clinton, Bush, Barack were not as evil as, for example, Truman, Reagan or the can. But the shit came out of all of them regularly. Still, I give Roosevelt and Kennedy some respect; they resolved important issues for the whole world. But in general, of course, there is nothing worse than the Anglo-Saxons on our planet.
  8. +2
    26 January 2024 15: 41
    It was Roosevelt and his team who prudently prepared the Second World War (The Origins of the Second World War: the United States against everyone) and pushed Germany and Japan to war.
    A statement based on nothing, followed by long-known cliches
    I immediately remembered army political information from the mid-80s - thanks to the author for that hi
  9. +2
    26 January 2024 17: 26
    The British and Americans were bad all the way, but suddenly they became good for 4 years.

    Hitler made them good with his stupidity and catastrophic mistake of attacking the USSR.
  10. +3
    27 January 2024 10: 41
    In the spring of 1945, the USSR's allies in the anti-Hitler coalition began to make offensive gestures towards Moscow
    ). So, on May 7, 1954, contrary to previous agreements, the Westerners recognized the surrender of Germany in Reims. At the insistence of Moscow, it was recognized as preliminary, and the procedure for unconditional surrender was repeated on the night of May 9 in the Berlin suburb of Karlshorst.

    Does anyone read the text?
    Personal opinion...
    If there are mistakes at the beginning of the article, even if the numbers are mixed up in places, the rest of the text may just be a bunch of phrases.
    To paraphrase ...
    VO readers and commentators have the authors and the news they deserve. (
  11. 0
    29 January 2024 02: 45
    So, on May 7, 1954, contrary to previous agreements, the Westerners recognized the surrender of Germany in Reims.

    The author is fantasizing. The surrender in Rems was signed on equal terms by the representative of the Supreme High Command Headquarters under the Allied Command, Major General Ivan Alekseevich Susloparov, and on the Anglo-American side - Lieutenant General of the US Army, Chief of the General Staff of the Allied Expeditionary Forces Walter Bedell Smith.
  12. 0
    April 21 2024 17: 14
    So, May 7 1954 year, contrary to previous agreements, the Westerners recognized the surrender of Germany in Reims.

    1945!!! It should be a shame in such an article to confuse such dates!
    Still not fixed!