Japanese threat to Russia

201
Japanese threat to Russia
Universal landing ship "Kaga" in the process of modernization, Japan


Enemy image


A record 95,3% of Japanese residents said they “do not have friendly feelings” towards Russia. Such data were obtained during the annual government opinion poll conducted in September-October 2023. The survey results, released by the Cabinet Office, show the highest levels of hostility toward Russia since such surveys began in 1975, Kyodo reported.



In the latest survey, only 4,1% of participants expressed “friendly feelings” towards Russia. The main reason for this was a special operation in Ukraine. Over the past two years, Japanese media have actively covered events in Ukraine in the interests of the Kyiv regime. Tokyo also maintains a hostile tone in relations with Moscow on the diplomatic and economic fronts. Japan participates in economic sanctions against the Russian Federation and finances Ukraine. All this had an impact on Japanese society, which was accustomed to trusting its authorities and the media.

At the same time that perceptions of Russia are deteriorating, a record level of hostility is being recorded towards China. 86,7% of respondents said they had no “friendly feelings” towards China. The two Asian powers are at odds over the disputed Senkaku (Diaoyu) Islands in the East China Sea, the Korean and Taiwan issues.

The negative opinion of Russia among the Japanese consistently breaks records for the second year in a row. In 2023, in a similar survey, only 3,1% of respondents assessed relations with Russia positively. 94,7% of respondents spoke about negative feelings towards Russia.

Militarization of Japan


Japan has been methodically and consistently arming itself in recent years. The military budget is constantly growing. The Japanese Self-Defense Forces have actually already been transformed into full-fledged armed forces, capable of not only defending themselves, but also attacking the enemy on his territory. The country's policy is aimed at a complete departure from military self-restraints associated with the defeat of the Japanese Empire during World War II.

The national security strategy adopted in 2022 established the right to counterattack the enemy. At the same time, Japan’s “biggest unresolved issue” named “the problem of the northern territories” (as the Kuril Islands are called in Japan).

Japan also sees a threat from China, whose policies have been called the “greatest strategic challenge” from the point of view of regional and global security. Another threat is North Korea (DPRK), due to the “strengthening of its nuclear forces both qualitatively and quantitatively,” as well as the rapid “development of relevant missile technologies.”

The bottom line, the strategy argues, is that Japan's security situation is at its most challenging since the end of World War II, so now is the time to act.

Russia poses “the most serious and immediate threat to Europe” – this is the wording contained in the new “White Paper” of the Japanese Ministry of Defense, adopted in 2023. From the policy document it follows: the government is concerned about “Russia’s military activities in the Indo-Pacific region” and its “strategic coordination with China.”

For the first time since World War II, Japanese troops received the right to preemptively counterattack enemy bases and command centers using long-range missiles. As a result, Japan is actively increasing its missile potential, developing its air force, navy, and landing forces.

Among the priority programs: the creation of light aircraft carriers based on Izumo-class helicopter destroyers; procurement drones; the purchase of American Tomahawk cruise missiles, which are capable of hitting targets at a distance of up to 1,6 thousand km, which will make it possible to strike the coastal areas of China, the DPRK and Russia; deployment of an updated version of the Japanese Type 12 anti-ship missile (flight range 1,2 thousand km); creation of a new generation fighter (including an unmanned version); development of military transport aviation etc.

By 2027, Japan's defense spending will rise to a record level of 2% of GDP. This is approximately 11 trillion yen (81 billion US dollars).

Threat from the East


It must be remembered that Japan is still the “unsinkable aircraft carrier” of the United States. And Washington and London are pursuing a policy of gradual strangulation (the “anaconda strategy”) of the Russian Federation using diplomatic, financial, economic, technological and military methods (the conflict in Ukraine).

The Americans and the British traditionally use other countries and peoples as battering rams and do not get involved in direct conflict themselves. In the European theater there is a mutual depletion of the two parts of the Russian civilization-world - Great and Little Rus'. In the Far East, the Anglo-British tandem traditionally uses Japan against Russia and China.

Also, since the Second World War, Japanese society has maintained a negative image of Russia, which “treacherously attacked” Japan in August 1945. The atomic bombing of Japanese cities is not associated with the United States (Japanese myth about nuclear bombing). They constantly support the issue of the “northern territories” (Kuril Islands).

It is obvious that Tokyo is burdened by its status as a losing power. Plus economic stagnation, which hit the country back in the 1990s and from which the country has never recovered. Although it retains the status of a country developed economically, technologically and industrially. Plus a demographic catastrophe, slow aging and decline of the nation. Psychological problems of the nation that force younger generations to refuse to start a family and go into virtual reality.

You should also take into account the favorable foreign policy moment. The old world order is falling apart. Countries large and small are starting more and more conflicts. Ukrainian front. Western Europe is heavily arming itself, NATO is moving east. Israel is destroying the Gaza Strip. The Houthis disrupt global trade and are bombed by the US and Britain (Who are the Houthis and why is the US bombing Yemen?). Iran and Pakistan exchanged blows. The Middle East is clearly overheated again. Tension is increasing on the Korean Peninsula, around Taiwan.

In such a situation, a victorious war clearly suggests itself. But it must be quick and victorious in order to remove the status of a defeated country. Then Japan will be able to finally reset the restrictions imposed after the defeat in World War II and restart the economy through the rapid development of the military-industrial complex. Militarize society, invigorate the nation.

To do this, you need to create a severe external crisis. There are three possible targets - the Russian Federation, China and North Korea (an ally of Beijing, so a conflict with China is inevitable).

In general, Japanese society does not see much value in the Kuril Islands. The northernmost Japanese island, Hokkaido, is sparsely populated. Only 5 million people out of the country's 125 million population. This is just an excuse. That's why they create the image of an enemy. A little effort by the media, and Japanese society will demand the return of the Kuril Islands and Sakhalin to their “native harbor.”

The question is where external aggression will be directed: to the north (Russian Federation) or to the south (Korea and China). About the same as before World War II. Russia looks more interesting: almost all of its military potential is in the Ukrainian direction. Military forces in the Pacific Ocean have been noticeably weakened. At the same time, jingoistic patriots do not need to shout about nuclear weapons Russia, which will incinerate any adversaries.

Japan does not have nuclear weapons, so they cannot be used against it. Just like in Ukraine. Only ground forces, air force and navy. And here Japan has an advantage, since it can concentrate all its forces in one direction. Russia cannot, connected to the West. In some respects, the scenario of the Russo-Japanese War of 1904–1905. The Russian Empire had a general military-economic advantage, but Japan could concentrate all its forces in the Far East.

However, another question is how the situation will develop on the Korean Peninsula and around Taiwan. If a mess breaks out there, Japan's attention will be focused on these theaters. And there is such an opportunity, since the situation on the planet is developing according to the “more chaos” scenario.
201 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -3
    24 January 2024 04: 32
    ***
    - Japan, with the support of the Soviet Union, became a member of the UN, signed and ratified the Charter of the organization, which contains Article 107, which states that all the results of the Second World War are inviolable.
    — The war between the USSR and Japan ended on September 2, 1945, with the signing by the Japanese of an act of unconditional surrender.
    - The state of war was officially terminated on October 19, 1956, when a joint Declaration was signed: "The state of war between the USSR and Japan ceases from the day this Declaration enters into force, and peace and good neighborly friendly relations are restored between them."
    - The Kuril Islands came under the control of the USSR following the Second World War, which was stipulated in the Cairo Declaration of 1943, the Potsdam Declaration of 1945, and also in the peace treaty signed in San Francisco in 1951.
    - Japan unconditionally recognized the Potsdam and Cairo Declarations and signed the act of surrender in 1945. And in 1951, the Japanese abandoned their claims to the Kuril Islands and Sakhalin.
    ---
    "Constitution of the Russian Federation"
    (adopted by popular vote on 12.12.1993 with amendments approved during a nationwide vote on 01.07.2020)
    Article 67,2.1-
    — "The Russian Federation ensures the protection of its sovereignty and territorial integrity. Actions aimed at alienating part of the territory of the Russian Federation, as well as calls for such actions are not allowed"
    ----------
    Salmon tail splashed on the wave
    The islands disappeared in the fog
    They will not return
    Deal with Nihon ...
    ---
    © V.V. Vorontsov Islands of the Rising Sun of Russia
    ***
    1. +2
      24 January 2024 20: 10
      Quote: Vladimir Vladimirovich Vorontsov
      - The state of war was officially terminated on October 19, 1956, when a joint Declaration was signed: "The state of war between the USSR and Japan ceases from the day this Declaration enters into force, and peace and good neighborly friendly relations are restored between them."

      Khe khe.

      The USSR did not sign this treaty. Precisely because not a word was said about the Northern Territories (of Japan, not to be confused with the Northern Territories of the People's Republic of China).
  2. +15
    24 January 2024 04: 34
    Japan does not have nuclear weapons, so they cannot be used against it.
    what kind of wildness is this? If war happens, what the hell are the “rules”? sweep the samurai into the sea with a nuclear barrage and that’s it. The war is over.
    1. -2
      24 January 2024 04: 40
      A Russian nuclear strike on Japanese territory will inevitably lead to confrontation with the United States. The countries are bound by a defense treaty, and the US military shares the same bases with the Japanese.
      1. +4
        24 January 2024 04: 51
        Quote: Tucan
        A Russian nuclear strike on Japanese territory will inevitably lead to confrontation with the United States. The countries are bound by a defense treaty, and the US military shares the same bases with the Japanese.
        It’s not at all necessary. Sometimes the sense of self-preservation works. And then, our doctrine provides for this. Let them read before they act.
      2. +11
        24 January 2024 06: 38
        Quote: Tucan
        A Russian nuclear strike on Japanese territory will inevitably lead to confrontation with the United States. The countries are bound by a defense treaty, and the US military shares the same bases with the Japanese.

        But a non-nuclear one won’t?
        1. +4
          24 January 2024 08: 26
          Quote: Vladimir_2U
          But a non-nuclear one won’t?

          More likely no than yes.
          But the Japanese will not act prematurely, they will wait for the right moment: a crisis of power, demographic collapse in the east, etc....
          1. +2
            24 January 2024 10: 19
            Readiness of its aircraft carriers (2 pcs). When they re-equip them, put them in combat readiness, then they can climb in. But not before.
            1. +8
              24 January 2024 10: 23
              Quote: Not the fighter
              Readiness of its aircraft carriers (2 pcs). When they re-equip them, put them in combat readiness, then they can climb in. But not before.

              For an isolated landing operation on Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands, the presence of these two aircraft carriers in the already significantly superior Japanese Pacific Fleet is not at all critical.
            2. -1
              24 January 2024 10: 24
              Readiness of its aircraft carriers (2 pcs).

              And how will they protect Japan from ICBMs?
              1. -3
                24 January 2024 10: 29
                Which ICBMs? Who will come to visit us? Read above, the use of nuclear weapons in a state that has prescribed a nuclear-free status in its constitution. Yes, after this we will be thrown out of the UN, unanimously and there will be an Iron Curtain along the entire border, a complete blockade, and in earnest. In fact, this is strangulation, not immediately but a little later, but the result is the same - the de-Russification of planet Earth.
                1. +6
                  24 January 2024 10: 33
                  Read above, the use of nuclear weapons in a state that has prescribed a nuclear-free status in its constitution.

                  You should read some materials on the doctrine of the Russian Federation.
                  1. -1
                    24 January 2024 17: 55
                    Quote: strannik1985
                    You should read some materials on the doctrine of the Russian Federation.

                    Apparently he read the novel; he writes everything correctly. And you?
                    1. +3
                      24 January 2024 19: 21
                      Apparently he read the novel; he writes everything correctly. And you?

                      Apparently we understand what we read differently? The Japanese will not strike at the location of the submarines of the 25th division?
                      1. -2
                        24 January 2024 19: 38
                        Quote: strannik1985
                        The Japanese will not strike at the location of the submarines of the 25th division?

                        In theory, they won’t, they’re not suicides. But even if they do... Should I quote the military doctrine?
                        The Russian Federation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in response to the use of nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction against it and (or) its allies, as well as in the case of aggression against the Russian Federation with the use of conventional weapons, when the very existence of the state is threatened.

                        Sorry, but an attack on submarine locations hardly threatens the very existence of the state.
                      2. +5
                        24 January 2024 21: 10
                        Should I quote the military doctrine?

                        enemy impact on critical state or military facilities of the Russian Federation, the disabling of which will lead to the disruption of the response actions of nuclear forces;
                        Please comment on this point.
                        Sorry, but an attack on submarine locations hardly threatens the very existence of the state.

                        But it is an attack on nuclear deterrent. And here the question arises - where is the nuclear threshold when applying MRU to targets in the air defense?
                      3. +1
                        25 January 2024 12: 26
                        Quote: strannik1985
                        But it is an attack on nuclear deterrent

                        Certainly. That's why I wrote
                        Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
                        In theory, they won’t, they’re not suicides.

                        But in general it turns out this way - most likely they will not deliver such blows, and even if they do, the interpretation can be twofold
                      4. +3
                        25 January 2024 19: 35
                        Certainly. That's why I wrote

                        How will the Russians know about this?
                        The Japanese are taking out ships, radars and other targets with missiles/bombs, and the minutes are counting. How do you understand that Japan is fighting alone? How will the Japanese distinguish an SSBN at sea from another submarine? How will the decision-maker guess that this is not a TMB beginning, but a get-together on the topic of wresting the Kuril Islands from Russia?
                      5. +1
                        26 January 2024 08: 18
                        Quote: strannik1985
                        How will the Russians know about this?

                        About what? About the attack that didn't happen?
                        Quote: strannik1985
                        The Japanese are taking out ships, radars and other targets with missiles/bombs, and the minutes are counting. How do you understand that Japan is fighting alone?

                        The minutes don't count. The country was subjected to aggression, yes - but the early warning system is silent - the Japanese do not have strategic nuclear forces. Accordingly, no one will grab hold of nuclear weapons.
                        Quote: strannik1985
                        How will the Japanese distinguish an SSBN at sea from another submarine?

                        In general, this is possible (without guarantees). But the point is that the Japanese most likely won’t need this. They need the Kuril Islands, they are not going to seize the mainland. Accordingly, military operations will begin around the disputed islands, but there are no SSBNs there.
                      6. +3
                        26 January 2024 12: 54
                        Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
                        They need the Kuril Islands

                        Dear colleague. Perhaps I’m wrong, but sometimes it occurs to me that the Kuril Islands themselves, as such, are needed by the Japanese in much the same way as “building communism” is needed by the USSR.
                        That is, a goal that unites the nation, but which, by and large, no one is going to achieve.
                        Another thing is that Japan, as a state, is not completely independent in foreign policy
                      7. 0
                        28 January 2024 07: 51
                        About the attack that didn't happen?

                        About the ongoing one, the logic is different - if they are hitting the Kuril Islands, then missiles are also flying at other targets, we just don’t see them.
                        The country was subjected to aggression, yes - but the early warning system is silent - the Japanese do not have strategic nuclear forces.

                        We don’t know that only the Japanese attack and only the Kuril Islands, otherwise this is some kind of agreement.
                        They need the Kuril Islands, they are not going to seize the mainland

                        And if you don’t take out the target on the shore, then the losses will be many times higher; I doubt that the Japanese authorities treat their own soldiers in the spirit of the Ukrainian ones.
                      8. 0
                        28 January 2024 13: 47
                        Quote: strannik1985
                        About the ongoing one, the logic is different - if they are hitting the Kuril Islands, then missiles are also flying at other targets, we just don’t see them.

                        It doesn't work that way. Maybe right now the missiles are flying, but we don’t see them - so what, long live Armageddon?
                        Quote: strannik1985
                        We don’t know that only the Japanese attack and only the Kuril Islands, otherwise this is some kind of agreement.

                        Again. Nuclear weapons are used if there is a threat to the existence of the state, and nothing else. Until there is FIRM confidence that such a threat exists, and it cannot be repelled by conventional means.
                        To make it clearer to you, both the United States and we were in situations where early warning systems reported detecting a massive nuclear missile strike. They wake up Brzezinski, saying the USSR launched 300 missiles. He asks for confirmation, they confirm it - 2200! And still he didn’t do anything, then it turned out it was a false alarm...
                        Nuclear weapons do not joke and do not grab at him for any reason. Everyone wants to live.
                        Quote: strannik1985
                        And if you don’t take out the target on the shore, then the losses will be many times higher

                        What goals are you planning to achieve?
                      9. 0
                        29 January 2024 09: 39
                        Maybe right now the missiles are flying, but we don’t see them - so what, long live Armageddon?

                        Right now, MRUs are not being deployed across the country, and Ukraine simply does not have such a missile potential.
                        Again.

                        The difference is that some part of the system fails, and then a massive blow is delivered to the territory of Russia; in fact, using the same principle, they tried to calculate the possibility of a conventional conflict in Europe under the USSR - they could not calculate the threshold for the use of nuclear weapons.
                        What goals are you planning to achieve?

                        Places where soldiers and equipment of the second echelon are unloaded, concentrations of troops, ammunition, and other property, Japanese military infrastructure facilities on its territory, ships at sea.
                      10. 0
                        29 January 2024 10: 37
                        Quote: strannik1985
                        Right now MRU is not being applied across the country

                        Likewise, Japan only has cruise missiles.
                        Quote: strannik1985
                        The difference is that some part of the system fails, but here a massive blow is delivered to Russian territory

                        Which does not threaten the existence of Russia.
                        Quote: strannik1985
                        in fact, using the same principle, they tried to calculate the possibility of a conventional conflict in Europe under the USSR - they could not calculate the threshold for the use of nuclear weapons

                        Of course we couldn’t, there were too many variables. As I already said, first they will try to solve everything with conventional weapons, and only if that doesn’t work, and only if the existence of the state is at stake, will they use nuclear
                        Quote: strannik1985
                        Japanese military infrastructure facilities

                        You were talking about Japanese attacks on us
                      11. 0
                        29 January 2024 12: 24
                        Likewise, Japan only has cruise missiles.

                        So far only anti-ship, but in November 2023 they announced the purchase of 200 Tomahawk Block IV missiles in 2025 and another 200 Block V in 2026-2027.
                        Which does not threaten the existence of Russia.

                        Well, how is he not threatening? Well, for example, should the 865 IAP in Yelizovo be carried out on the Mig-31?
                        You were talking about Japanese attacks on us

                        Well, yes, from the mainland they will attack concentrations of troops/equipment/material supplies on the island, ships, and facilities in Japan itself; the enemy will not be able to ignore this.
                      12. +6
                        25 January 2024 11: 01
                        It depends on how you identify it. The very aggression against the Russian Navy calls into question the recognition of the Russian Federation as a maritime power. As a citizen of the Russian Federation, I believe it is true and correct to use tactical nuclear weapons against Japan to quickly end the conflict with minimal losses on our part.
                2. -1
                  24 January 2024 14: 52
                  Why do we need a world in which we are not present? If my memory serves me correctly, this was what the guarantor of Russian security said!
                  1. +8
                    24 January 2024 17: 56
                    Quote: Sailor
                    If my memory serves me correctly, this was what the guarantor of Russian security said!

                    So he said a lot of things... It’s no use what he said.
                3. +4
                  25 January 2024 21: 22
                  If the Japs come at us, we have every right to use nuclear weapons, this is an attack and an attempt on our sovereignty and territorial integrity....
                4. +2
                  27 January 2024 01: 04
                  It is precisely the absence of a nuclear response to such an attack that would be a much worse option. Well, unless, of course, flocks of calibers bury the Japanese emperor with his family and parliament along with nuclear waste storage facilities, and the fleet is not sunk with daggers. And it turns out that Russia is more of a paper hare and can be thrown out of the UN, wiped out with all the agreements, squeeze out territories, confiscate anything. They'll come up with a reason, with this in the West the masters
            3. +2
              24 January 2024 15: 53
              Quote: Not the fighter
              Readiness of its aircraft carriers (2 pcs). When they re-equip them, put them in combat readiness, then they can climb

              Aircraft carriers are being prepared for a possible collision with the Chinese Navy...
              The most dangerous for the Japanese Navy will be the nuclear submarines of the Pacific Fleet. Stopping this threat will be difficult. Therefore, the Japanese will most likely wait for a possible deep crisis, when there is simply no one to give a clear order...
              1. +5
                25 January 2024 10: 30
                I agree with you, they will insidiously wait for the arrival of a cowardly leader in Russia. Otherwise, they have nothing to catch except crabs. Yes, their fleet is huge, they are an island state, the location obliges them. 4 (FOUR) helicopter carriers and landing ships can create a mess for our people there, because even the sinking of large ships with tons of Japanese is not critical for them (they are not critical of losses). But...here they have to get into a meat grinder, with the PRC and the DPRK at their side, who are just waiting to get even on them for the Second World War - this is suicide, they will tear Japan into islands. In addition, those who carefully read messages from the DPRK are aware of the news indicated by Kim “we have our own Poseidon, we are testing it” .... whose Poseidon they have is the tenth thing, but for the ports of Japan with their infrastructure this is fatal, stupid there will be nowhere for the fleet to return, no refueling, no maintenance, no rotation. So Japan is still just a strain from the Yankees for all our neighbors.... and for us, we cannot relax and we urgently need to strengthen the Far East after the Northeast Military District! The future is in Asia, we need to increase our power there!
                1. 0
                  25 January 2024 11: 06
                  If the return of the fleet proceeds in the same spirit under the command of the Navy, then the next step should be the revival of Naval Aviation. And no matter how powerful the fleet is with even two aircraft carrier formations, land aviation will unravel it into pieces. And the Japs are aware of this. Looks like they're still scratching their heads over Midway.
        2. +2
          24 January 2024 20: 11
          Quote: Vladimir_2U
          But a non-nuclear one won’t?

          It won’t lead, the Japanese themselves will pile on.
      3. +4
        24 January 2024 06: 42
        Quote: Tucan
        A Russian nuclear strike on Japanese territory will inevitably lead to confrontation with the United States. The countries are bound by a defense treaty, and the US military shares the same bases with the Japanese.

        The man is absolutely right, by the way! What are the disadvantages?
        Without the risk of starting a nuclear war with the United States, the Russian armed forces can realistically use tactical missiles, airborne free-falling bombs and torpedoes equipped with “special” warheads to repel Japanese aggression only in neutral waters or on their own territory.
        For those who disagree with this, I recommend studying this:
        American air defense forces, aviation reconnaissance and control systems deployed in Japan
        https://topwar.ru/184868-amerikanskie-sily-pvo-aviacionnye-sredstva-razvedki-i-upravlenija-razvernutye-na-territorii-japonii.html#
        1. +1
          24 January 2024 07: 59
          Quote: Bongo
          Without the risk of starting a nuclear war with the United States...


          Do you really think that the United States is ready to exchange nuclear strikes with Russia for the sake of Japan or Ukraine? It’s one thing to fight with someone else’s hands, but quite another to get nuclear weapons in your own cities... Americans, of course, often go too far and walk on the “edge” in many situations, but even for them this is too much) Biden will immediately be snitched on by the elites if there is a real threat to their existence.

          So the US security guarantees are valid... but up to certain limits, and if a conflict between Japan and Russia really happens, then we will see Ukraine 2.0, only with more support (military/political, etc.) but Americans are not ready to die for Japan , and Russia has nothing else but to rely on the use of nuclear weapons in a conflict with Japan... because Japan is objectively stronger than we are in the Far East.
          1. +3
            24 January 2024 09: 54
            Quote: Aleksandr21
            Do you really think that the United States is ready to exchange nuclear strikes with Russia for the sake of Japan or Ukraine?

            And thousands of American troops are stationed in Ukraine and there are hundreds of American military installations, and a mutual defense treaty has been concluded between Ukraine and the United States? Did not know... request
            1. +4
              24 January 2024 11: 02
              Quote: Tucan

              And thousands of American troops are stationed in Ukraine and there are hundreds of American military installations, and a mutual defense treaty has been concluded between Ukraine and the United States? Did not know... request


              By this logic, a US strike on Khmeinim in Syria would lead to an exchange of nuclear strikes. But is this so in practice? Middle East The US has bases everywhere... Iran attacked American military personnel in 2020 and what, Iran was wiped off the face of the earth? Or maybe US troops aren't dying from Houthi/rebel/etc strikes. on BV? They die, but this does not lead to the use of nuclear weapons.

              There is a possibility that in the event of a conflict on the Korean Peninsula, the DPRK will destroy all American bases that it can reach (in Japan as well), but I strongly doubt that in the event of military retaliation the Americans will use nuclear weapons because there is a possibility that Korean missiles will reach the American mainland and no one will care.

              And in the case of Russia, you have to be suicidal... Therefore, if, God forbid, of course, there is a military conflict between Japan and Russia in the future, then the Americans will think 10 times about what kind of help to provide and what risks there will be in the event of a direct conflict with Russia.
              1. +6
                24 January 2024 11: 52
                Just for understanding... if suddenly there is a military conflict between Japan and Russia, then the initiator will be the Japanese side, because... There is no benefit for us from this, and taking into account the unsigned peace agreement, the chances of conflict in the 2030s-2050s are quite decent. And objectively, in the Far East our chances against Japan are small (taking into account the weapons, the state of the Pacific Fleet and other factors), and either we use nuclear weapons and win the conflict, or Russia will be defeated militarily (Kuril Islands, Sakhalin... and the appetite comes during meals , and who knows where the Japanese will stop) because Japan has a population of 124 million, and although there are many elderly and middle-aged people there, the mob reserves are huge when compared with Ukraine, and the weapons and fleet are at a completely different level. Only nuclear weapons will equalize our chances...
                1. -2
                  24 January 2024 12: 55
                  Quote: Aleksandr21
                  Only nuclear weapons will equalize our chances...

                  Firstly, the Americans will simply transfer their nuclear weapons to the Japanese.
                  Secondly, by using nuclear weapons against a nuclear-free country, you will open Pandora’s box and all countries will begin to arm themselves with these same nuclear weapons.
                  1. +1
                    24 January 2024 14: 56
                    Quote: Mordvin 3
                    By using nuclear weapons against a nuclear-free country, you will open Pandora's box and all countries will begin to arm themselves with these same nuclear weapons.

                    This is where it’s difficult to agree with you. This process did not begin yesterday and continues happily to this day, sometimes faster, sometimes slower.
                    How do you think our NWO will affect the world community in this regard? And it will reflect...
                    1. +1
                      24 January 2024 15: 02
                      Quote: Adrey
                      How do you think our NWO will affect the world community in this regard?

                      By itself. We just need to wait for the results of the SVO.
                      1. 0
                        24 January 2024 15: 13
                        Quote: Mordvin 3
                        We just need to wait for the results of the SVO.

                        good
                    2. 0
                      24 January 2024 16: 47
                      Quote: Adrey
                      How do you think our NWO will affect the world community in this regard?

                      Don’t you think that our Northern Military District is nothing compared to Iraq, Libya, Yugoslavia, Afghanistan..? .. All these operations "Desert Storms, etc.. Showed the rest of the world the way to solve problems.. by war.. Or is it something else? Others can't?
                      1. +1
                        24 January 2024 18: 39
                        Quote: 30 vis
                        Don’t you think that our Northern Military District is nothing compared to Iraq, Libya, Yugoslavia, Afghanistan..?

                        Well, of course you can’t call it “nothing,” but you are absolutely right - another “one egg in the basket” of the predominance of “might is right” in international politics and the path of the UN in the footsteps of the League of Nations.
                        Quote: 30 vis
                        Or is this something else? Others can't?

                        Why? Can. "The right of the strong" is such a right request
                        How does this contradict my thesis about the proliferation of nuclear weapons in the world?
                  2. +2
                    24 January 2024 16: 58
                    Quote: Mordvin 3
                    Firstly, the Americans will simply transfer their nuclear weapons to the Japanese.
                    Secondly, by using nuclear weapons against a nuclear-free country, you will open Pandora’s box and all countries will begin to arm themselves with these same nuclear weapons.


                    The objection is accepted. But without the use of nuclear weapons, Russia has no chance against Japan in the Far East. If we are messing around with Ukraine so much, then what will happen to a country with a population of 120+ million and which is very developed technologically/militarily…. there is only one alternative, admit military defeat and give Japan everything it asks for.
                    1. 0
                      24 January 2024 17: 12
                      Quote: Aleksandr21
                      But without the use of nuclear weapons, Russia has no chance against Japan in the Far East.

                      There is no chance based on the Navy's strength. As for land, you have to scratch your turnip for a long time.
                      1. +2
                        24 January 2024 20: 14
                        Quote: Mordvin 3
                        on land - here you have to scratch your turnip for a long time.

                        In what territory? If we are talking about a strategic landing operation for maintenance, then this is simply ridiculous.
                      2. 0
                        24 January 2024 20: 25
                        Quote: Negro
                        In what territory? If we are talking about a strategic landing operation for maintenance, then this is simply ridiculous.

                        For whom is it funny?
                      3. 0
                        24 January 2024 20: 35
                        Strategic landing operation against Japan by the forces of the Russian Armed Forces.
                      4. +1
                        24 January 2024 21: 00
                        Quote: Negro
                        Strategic landing operation against Japan by the forces of the Russian Armed Forces.

                        On what? On inflatable boats? Or airborne forces by parachute?
                      5. +2
                        24 January 2024 21: 04
                        Quote: Mordvin 3
                        On what?

                        Yes, this is one of many questions. Although, in principle, one is enough.
          2. +1
            24 January 2024 09: 54
            Quote: Aleksandr21
            Do you really think that the United States is ready to exchange nuclear strikes with Russia for the sake of Japan or Ukraine?

            And thousands of American troops are stationed in Ukraine and there are hundreds of American military facilities, and a mutual defense treaty has been concluded between Ukraine and the United States, like with Japan? Did not know... request
          3. +1
            24 January 2024 12: 56
            Quote: Aleksandr21
            Quote: Bongo
            Without the risk of starting a nuclear war with the United States...


            Do you really think that the United States is ready to exchange nuclear strikes with Russia for the sake of Japan or Ukraine? It’s one thing to fight with someone else’s hands, but quite another to get nuclear weapons in your own cities... Americans, of course, often go too far and walk on the “edge” in many situations, but even for them this is too much) Biden will immediately be snitched on by the elites if there is a real threat to their existence.

            So the US security guarantees are valid... but up to certain limits, and if a conflict between Japan and Russia really happens, then we will see Ukraine 2.0, only with more support (military/political, etc.) but Americans are not ready to die for Japan , and Russia has nothing else but to rely on the use of nuclear weapons in a conflict with Japan... because Japan is objectively stronger than we are in the Far East.


            I understand that this is:
            Quote: Bongo
            American air defense forces, aviation reconnaissance and control systems deployed in Japan
            https://topwar.ru/184868-amerikanskie-sily-pvo-aviacionnye-sredstva-razvedki-i-upravlenija-razvernutye-na-territorii-japonii.html#
            you didn’t consider it necessary to read.

            Okay, let's go from the other side. Imagine that after an attack using weapons of mass destruction from Syria, Israel did not carry out a nuclear retaliatory strike, and the port of Tartus, where about 1500 Russian troops are stationed, came under attack, among other targets. Do you think this will be a casus belli for Russia?

            Maybe I don’t understand something or don’t know, please tell me what strategically important facility in terms of defense, or at least a large Japanese city, do you propose to launch a nuclear strike on, so that, God forbid, it doesn’t hit any more than 90 American military bases deployed on the Japanese islands and not harm any of the approximately 50 American troops?

            No, you can, of course, give up on everything and hit the air force at the base of the Yokota Air Self-Defense Force (about 30 km west of Tokyo) or the port of Yokohama, where a significant part of the Japanese warships are located.
            Only both of these facilities are also used by the Americans, who will most likely turn large cities in the Russian Far East into ashes.

            Despite bellicose statements and numerous “red lines,” our military-political leadership is very fond of worldly joys and is in no hurry to “go to heaven.” No.
            1. 0
              24 January 2024 16: 51
              Quote: Bongo
              I understand that this is...
              you didn’t consider it necessary to read.


              Actually, the question for you was not related to the presence of Americans in Japan, but to the thesis about the use of US nuclear weapons in the Japan-Russia conflict, you never answered the question and decided to come from the other side... okay.

              Quote: Bongo
              Okay, let's go from the other side. Imagine that after an attack using weapons of mass destruction from Syria, Israel did not carry out a nuclear retaliatory strike, and the port of Tartus, where about 1500 Russian troops are stationed, came under attack, among other targets. Do you think this will be a casus belli for Russia?


              Of course this will be a casus belli, but then answer yourself... Will Russia be ready to start a war with Israel, for the sake of which our military was engaged (by chance, not by chance, it doesn’t matter)? How many incidents did we have with Turkey and what led to the war? And with Israel... we will sever relations (diplomatic/financial/economic, etc.) maybe even throw something at Israel’s opponents and act behind the scenes.... but we definitely will not launch nuclear strikes on Israel.


              Quote: Bongo
              Maybe I don't understand or don't know something


              Let's imagine the real situation, 2040s, Japan decided to reclaim the Kuril Islands and declared claims to Sakhalin and other Russian territories in the Far East, motivated by the fact that a peace treaty has not been signed, and the territories historically belong to Japan... an armed conflict began between Russia and Japan, which has a population of 120+ million people and having an overwhelming military advantage in the region + with the support of the United States, what chances do the Pacific Fleet and the Russian Armed Forces in the Far East have to repel aggression??? And why should US military bases in Japan stop us from defending our own country?

              If you are afraid of a conflict with the United States, then you should already complete the SVO on Western terms, and with the claims of Japan and any other US allies, hand over everything they ask.
            2. -2
              24 January 2024 20: 26
              Quote: Bongo
              will this be a casus belli for Russia?

              Of course not.
              Because of some one and a half thousand military personnel, who are unlikely to all die, will someone attack Israel in its theater of operations? By what forces? Or can he risk a strike on Moscow and check who has the best missile defense system?

              It's funny to even discuss it.
              Quote: Bongo
              Despite belligerent statements and numerous “red lines,” our military-political leadership is very fond of worldly joys and is in no hurry to “go to heaven.”

              Yes, but...

              I rarely agree with nuclear patriots, but I will agree here. The Japanese will not take risks because of such a trifle as spitting in the ocean. It would be imprudent to hope that in this regard the Russian Federation will carry out some of its own paperwork. It won’t take long to correct these pieces of paper, and backdated them.

              However, the Japanese have three neighbors with nuclear weapons and, so to speak, reduced predictability. At the same time, the main ally shows little consistency and may not say “live as you want” today in 2025. Regarding Taiwan, he just made some extremely strange statements.

              So the appearance of Japanese nuclear weapons is inevitable. And then, yes, a different view may appear on the problem of the northern territories.
            3. +1
              30 January 2024 15: 31
              It's unlikely to turn into ashes. They are aware that this will be a retaliatory step. And Japan cannot be defeated by other forces. It's not the summer of 1945. Russia does not have so many troops and talented military leaders)))
        2. -2
          24 January 2024 10: 47
          Quote: Bongo
          Without the risk of starting a nuclear war with the United States, use...

          If events develop according to the described scenario, there is essentially no other way out request
          Using conventional means to repel the landing on the Kuril Islands and Sakhalin with the Navy, Air Force, and Armed Forces available in the theater of operations, it is extremely difficult and costly. We can only rely on nuclear weapons. How to use it
          Quote: Bongo
          only in neutral waters or on its own territory.

          big question. The Yaps declared the disputed territories theirs in advance, fortunately we ourselves created a precedent in the Northern Military District. Although, the degree of reaction of the world community will of course be different.
          The most interesting are the immediate results of the conflict. In the event of non-use of nuclear weapons and loss, the country will suffer such damage in the foreign policy arena in its image that all nearby limitrophes (and not only), former “almost allies” will want to bite off their “piece of the pie”. All this against the backdrop of unconditional internal unrest (1905). So yes, “a direct, obvious threat to the existence of the state” according to the existing doctrine. And the use of nuclear weapons on Japanese territory is 95% TMV.
          So, what is the best way to use or not to use nuclear weapons in Japan is an interesting question. In any case, any of these solutions require “balls of steel.” And the Japanese are just now busy considering this aspect hi
          1. +3
            24 January 2024 18: 47
            I see 3 hypothetical scenarios for a Japanese attack.
            1) A major war in the Russian Federation connecting its forces on distant fronts. That is, in the European part.
            By the word Large, I mean a conflict that is more intense (but perhaps less acute) than the Northern Military District - with greater risks and the need for greater involvement of forces.
            That is, a sort of “SVO+”. SVO is still SVO, with all that we have. But “if” Poland got involved in the conflict, for example, by sending its troops into Western Ukraine, creating a no-fly zone, etc. - this would strain us much more than it does now.
            What is described is a kind of minimal state in which, in my opinion, Japan would begin to act instead of mumbling. The maximum state is the expansion of the current local conflict involving a larger number of forces, but within a conventional framework.

            In this case, they would have waited a little, and then, in a blitz “according to the Crimean scenario,” they would have deployed their forces, mainly trying to act bloodlessly in the territories that they considered theirs. That is, “polite green Japanese men” supported by polite Japanese ships on the horizon, polite planes in the sky and a couple of American aircraft carriers somewhere not so far away, completely by chance, so to speak.
            Our encircled forces would have asked somewhere, they would have given it somewhere, and then there would have been a very polite ultimatum, in which Japan, with all ostentatious respect, would have declared that the conflict had been settled for it, but it had all the forces and means if not , to continue and expand it. That is - Respect or Makhach.
            This arrangement maximizes the use of nuclear weapons, and in general this is the most disgusting arrangement, in my opinion.

            2) They do the same thing, but wait until the “internal contradictions grow.”

            3) A sharp blitz without direct connection to obvious details. It’s just that, for example, the Japanese have intelligence data indicating the state of our rapid reaction forces in the region, they evaluate them and make a decision “a la 1904” - a quick information campaign to escalate, an even quicker targeted blitz. puts us before a choice - to resign ourselves or to deploy resources and forces under the threat of losing more.
            In THIS case, yes, we can use nuclear weapons - assessing the situation itself and potential threats, one-time losses and the balance of forces available in the region in the foreseeable future.
            1. -1
              24 January 2024 18: 56
              Quote: Knell Wardenheart
              I see 3 hypothetical scenarios for a Japanese attack.

              We are already standing on the threshold of the first and second.
              Quote: Knell Wardenheart
              It’s just that, for example, the Japanese have intelligence data indicating the state of our rapid reaction forces in the region

              I think they have this information in sufficient volume so.
              The NWO current has revealed many “cards” and is coming to the fore (IMHO)
              Quote: Adrey
              In any case, any of these solutions require “balls of steel.” And the Japanese are just now busy considering this aspect
            2. -1
              24 January 2024 20: 44
              Quote: Knell Wardenheart
              would deploy their forces primarily trying to act bloodlessly in the territories that they consider their own. That is, “polite green Japanese men” supported by polite Japanese ships on the horizon, polite planes in the sky and a couple of American aircraft carriers somewhere not so far away, completely by chance, so to speak.

              Nonsense.

              If we are talking about the Southern Kuril Islands, then there is almost no one there, only border guards. It takes them 15 minutes to render the case. The Pacific Fleet will not even have time to hand over the mooring lines. And thank God he doesn’t have time, going to Japan is certain death.
              1. +3
                25 January 2024 15: 11
                Quote: Negro
                If we are talking about the Southern Kuril Islands, then there is almost no one there, only border guards.

                It seems like you wrote adequate comments before. Maybe you should visit Kunashir and Iturup yourself and see for yourself that there are not only border guards there?
                My husband and I were there in 2021, after which he wrote this article.

                Russian military presence in the Kuril Islands
                https://topwar.ru/187052-rossijskoe-voennoe-prisutstvie-na-kurilskih-ostrovah.html
                1. 0
                  25 January 2024 18: 58
                  Quote: Negro
                  If we are talking about the Southern Kuril Islands, then there is almost no one there

                  This meant “no population”, so the question is only about military control.
                  Quote: zyablik.olga
                  after which he wrote this article.

                  And he wrote that there was almost a division there.

                  OK, the "15 minutes" figure is not realistic. Which one should I put?
              2. +1
                26 January 2024 13: 37
                Quote: Negro
                If we are talking about the Southern Kuril Islands, then there is almost no one there, only border guards. It takes them 15 minutes to render the case. The Pacific Fleet will not even have time to hand over the mooring lines.
                You write about the so-called “zones of restricted and denied access.” Why are you sure that there are only border guards there and that the Russian Federation will wait 15 minutes, and the Pacific Fleet will hand over the mooring lines? Maybe the Japanese won’t even have time to shout “Banzai”.
              3. 0
                27 January 2024 01: 16
                What's the point? Are the Americans telling you? Well, that is, it’s part of the series to go and rob the nearest supermarket with shooting, take 50 thousand rubles with the risk of sitting down for 15 years. What if there is a revolution in Moscow, the rag tsar is swept away and does not fight with each other, but takes out the Japanese fleet with vigorous loaves of bread near these islands? What if Richard Sorge-2 snitched six months before and the missile defense missiles were hidden in the bushes of the islands and drowned the Japanese landing force? What is the goal? Is it commensurate with the risks?
                1. The comment was deleted.
                2. +1
                  27 January 2024 02: 39
                  Quote from alexoff
                  What is the goal? Is it commensurate with the risks?

                  You are right, I am writing this too.
                  Quote: Negro
                  I rarely agree with nuclear patriots, but I will agree here. The Japanese will not take risks because of such a trifle as spitting in the ocean.

                  Quote: Negro
                  So the appearance of Japanese nuclear weapons is inevitable. And then, yes, a different view may appear on the problem of the northern territories
                  1. 0
                    27 January 2024 13: 28
                    Japanese nuclear weapons appear as a response to China and the DPRK. The Japanese have these islands only to fish in the Sea of ​​Okhotsk; the Japanese themselves are not slaves like some Poles. And they used to be allowed to fish, until they committed eco-terrorism and caught almost all the salmon in one year, and the population then recovered for several years.
                    In general, I somehow can’t remember that there were evil Russians in a Japanese cartoon over the last 10 years
          2. +2
            24 January 2024 20: 39
            Quote: Adrey
            The Yaps declared the disputed territories theirs in advance, fortunately we ourselves created a precedent in the Northern Military District

            Khe khe
            In fact, the precedent of the Kuril Islands appeared long before the Northern Military District and even before the Crimea.
            Quote: Adrey
            Although, the degree of reaction of the world community will of course be different.

            The world community has long ago decided
            Quote: Adrey
            All this against the backdrop of unconditional internal unrest

            Why? Most likely no one will know about this. Have you heard a lot about the transfer of some villages to Azerbaijan 15 years ago?
            Quote: Adrey
            The Japanese are currently busy considering this aspect

            In fact, the Japanese have a lot of more urgent things to do.
      4. +1
        24 January 2024 09: 12
        Quote: Tucan
        A Russian nuclear strike on Japanese territory will inevitably lead to confrontation with the United States

        What do we have now? Foreplay?
        1. +2
          24 January 2024 09: 50
          I'm sure you understand perfectly what we're talking about!
        2. +4
          24 January 2024 12: 58
          Quote: Winnie76
          Now what do we have?

          Something like Vietnam.
      5. +1
        24 January 2024 10: 26
        A Russian nuclear strike on Japanese territory will inevitably lead to confrontation with the United States.

        And they will risk their own country for the sake of Japanese ambitions? Is this against the background of the confrontation with China? Seriously?
      6. 0
        25 January 2024 12: 36
        It’s okay, the coffins will also be divided. I don’t think that an attack by our tactical nuclear weapons on the ATTACKING Japanese will lead to an attack by the United States. The main thing is that there are enough carriers in the Far East, and different ones - cruise and ballistic missiles, aviation, navy, and we will make warheads.
    2. +6
      24 January 2024 05: 22
      Quote: Aerodrome
      what kind of wildness is this? If war happens, what the hell are the “rules”? sweep the samurai into the sea with a nuclear barrage and that’s it. The war is over.

      Quote: Aerodrome
      what kind of wildness is this? If war happens, what the hell are the “rules”? sweep the samurai into the sea with a nuclear barrage and that’s it. The war is over.

      Yes, the second army in the world... In the event of an escalation with Japan, rely only on nuclear weapons. There is NOTHING to support from the West! And the Navy also has nothing to “throw in”. There are no real surface ships. what what hi hi
    3. -5
      24 January 2024 19: 36
      One nuclear submarine carries six Poseidons. Each one will create such a tsunami that it will not seem small.
      There are “Daggers” that, even without nuclear weapons, will arrange “Armageddon” by striking important centers
      1. +4
        24 January 2024 20: 45
        Quote: knn54
        One nuclear submarine carries six Poseidons.

        Does it carry haloperidol?
        1. -1
          26 January 2024 13: 58
          Quote: Negro
          Quote: knn54
          One nuclear submarine carries six Poseidons.
          Does it carry haloperidol?
          K-329 most likely carries six Poseidons, and buy haloperidol at the pharmacy if you have a prescription.
  3. +13
    24 January 2024 05: 19
    A record 95,3% of Japanese residents said they “do not have friendly feelings” towards Russia.
    Name a country where 95,3% love Russia?
    1. +2
      24 January 2024 05: 37
      .
      Quote: parusnik
      A record 95,3% of Japanese residents said they “do not have friendly feelings” towards Russia.
      Name a country where 95,3% love Russia?
      There are no such statistics.
      request
      1. +6
        24 January 2024 05: 45
        There are no such statistics.
        So what should we do? How can bourgeois modern Russia win love and ensure world peace? Something like this: “Love a pianist, even though he is unprepossessing in appearance, still has no titles, don’t rush to leave, life is full of improvisations, a pianist can be a genius. Black keys, white keys, you can’t fix everything that happened, he’s not Richter yet and not Liszt, love the pianist, quickly, quickly, very quickly - the motto of modern music." (c)
        1. -7
          24 January 2024 05: 57
          To love a pianist...however belay ...this is for LGBT people...there is a great experience of such love.
          And in general, posing the question of winning love always leads to collapse... as happened with the USSR, which tried to win the love of the working class of workers and peasants around the world.
          1. +10
            24 January 2024 06: 07
            ...this is for LGBT people...there is a great experience of such love.
            Who is in pain? And for reference, a fairly well-known song in Soviet times, music by R. Pauls, poetry by I. Reznik, first performer A. Mironov. Very often heard on the radio in Soviet times in the program “Working Noon”
            And in general, posing the question of winning love always leads to collapse...
            Then, no need to whine that there are Russophobes all around and no one loves us...
            1. -2
              24 January 2024 06: 10
              Then, no need to whine that there are Russophobes all around and no one loves us...

              smile And that's how the Chinese whine...
              The United States is inciting its vassals to war with Russia, claiming that it could start at any moment, writes infoBRICS. According to the author of the article, the States are well aware that they are unable to resist the Eurasian giant, so they incite Russophobia wherever they can.

              Who hurts.

              Ha...the same cannot be said about the attitude of GDP towards LBGT.
              I respect Raymond Pauls...he’s a decent man...unlike Pugachikha...hehe who fed the entire USSR.
              1. +5
                24 January 2024 06: 14
                Therefore, they incite Russophobia wherever they can.
                And what about Russia, why doesn’t Russophobia extinguish? Wherever possible... by peaceful means... Since they are so intensely inciting...
                1. +3
                  24 January 2024 06: 22
                  Quote: parusnik
                  And what about Russia, why doesn’t Russophobia extinguish? Wherever possible... through peaceful means.

                  They have been extinguishing...since 1990...from the borders of the GDR to the borders of Russia...they have extinguished it...now NATO has lined up 90 thousand Soldatens in a parade near St. Petersburg...with the demand to extinguish Russophobia by peaceful means and further.
                  1. +2
                    24 January 2024 06: 24
                    Is this a complaint against me? Or to whom?
                    now NATO has 90 thousand soldaten near St. Petersburg
                    Did I line them up?
                    1. +2
                      24 January 2024 06: 35
                      Did I line them up?

                      In no case.
                      They were lined up by 31 states that are part of NATO... I doubt that they really want to love Russia peacefully.
                      The matter is again, according to the leaders of this organization, moving towards the next Drang Nach Osten...naturally, under the guise of rhetoric about aggressive Russia.
                      1. 0
                        24 January 2024 06: 38
                        Will you let me see the rest of the materials? Why are you so restless? Are you a former warrant officer? Who can make a claim against the post? Believe me, your reasoning is not at all interesting to me, TV is enough for me
          2. +7
            24 January 2024 08: 39
            Quote: Lech from Android.
            The USSR tried to win the love of the working class of workers and peasants around the world.

            Why did he “try”, they really loved and respected the USSR. People from 157 countries came to Moscow for the XII Festival of Youth and Students. Now this is impossible even in theory...
        2. +7
          24 January 2024 06: 27
          Why conquer it abroad? Here at home, the devil knows what’s going on. We need to restore order in our house with brotherly love. And don’t worry that they don’t like us there. If society is cemented, not fragmented, then no creature will encroach ..Dreams...
          1. +4
            24 January 2024 06: 30
            Why conquer it over the hill?
            I already answered, I’ll repeat for you, then there’s no need to whine that there are Russophobes all around hi
        3. +2
          24 January 2024 08: 00
          Quote: parusnik
          So what to do?

          Disperse all the rednecks of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and assemble a new one. The results of which will be better than the only friends being the army and navy? I’m not delusional, there are only irreplaceable people sitting there wassat
    2. +1
      24 January 2024 05: 45
      Quote: parusnik
      Name a country where 95,3% love Russia?

      Antarcticasmile...land of penguins.
      1. +2
        24 January 2024 05: 53
        even North Korea, on the orders of Comrade Eun, will not gain so much percent....
      2. +5
        24 January 2024 06: 10
        ..land of penguins.
        and the remaining 5% of penguins are Russophobes?
        1. 0
          24 January 2024 06: 19
          and the remaining 5% of penguins are Russophobes?

          According to polls conducted by independent agencies...1 percent are Russophobes, 1 percent don't care, 1 percent are supporters of democracy...the remaining 2 percent are hesitant...waiting for who will win.
          1. +2
            24 January 2024 06: 21
            So these remaining percentages are still wavering, don’t care democrats, Russophobes? Is this the work of the USA?
            1. +1
              24 January 2024 06: 24
              Is this the work of the USA?

              Undoubtedly...Julian Assange and the British will not let you lie...and Chinese intelligence confirms this...it’s not for nothing that articles about this appeared in the Chinese press.
              1. +1
                24 January 2024 06: 26
                Well, okay. Did you get moral satisfaction from communicating with me? Then goodbye.
                1. 0
                  24 January 2024 06: 29
                  Well ... request I’m very sorry...in no way did I want to offend you in any way.
                  1. 0
                    24 January 2024 06: 31
                    Yes, you didn’t offend me, but I’m not interested in communicating with you. Let me read the rest of the articles and news..
                    1. 0
                      24 January 2024 06: 39
                      Got it...I won't bother you. hi
        2. +3
          24 January 2024 08: 16
          Quote: parusnik
          and the remaining 5% of penguins are Russophobes?

          They are silent on this topic. But they don't work on Saturdays.
        3. +2
          24 January 2024 09: 45
          belay They are probably glad that we closed the Antarctic stations... Otherwise they disturbed them, the penguins. Or...
    3. Des
      +1
      24 January 2024 07: 11
      Quote: parusnik
      Name a country where 95,3% love Russia?
      that’s why we are that same hippopotamus in the world’s sandbox (anecd.).
    4. +1
      24 January 2024 16: 52
      Quote: parusnik
      A record 95,3% of Japanese residents said they “do not have friendly feelings” towards Russia.
      Name a country where 95,3% love Russia?

      Is it better to love your country and people? And then, you might think that the French love the Germans and the English? Do Georgians love Azerbaijanis and Armenians? Maybe the Poles love someone? And do they experience friendly feelings? No, of course the Poles grovel before the Anglo-Saxons, but they hardly love or respect them.. hiThese same Anglo-Saxons... I’m generally silent about the Jews.... lol
    5. 0
      27 January 2024 01: 18
      Japanese statistics are a questionable thing; only his close friends and relatives know what a Japanese person thinks, the majority simply say that they say on TV to leave him alone.
    6. 0
      30 January 2024 15: 39
      Belarus! Serbia. These countries will suit it. I think that African countries can still provide such a percentage. Syria will also thank you. Sincerely!
  4. +3
    24 January 2024 06: 38
    Quote from: dmi.pris1
    We need to put our house in order with brotherly love. And not worry that they don’t like us there.

    That's for sure...I look at what migrants are doing on our streets and I'm horrified...Bastrykin, like an automatic machine, initiates criminal cases based on their tricks...how long will he last?
    And GDP, as always, is on the sidelines...why it does not intervene in this situation is unclear. what
  5. +8
    24 January 2024 06: 53
    The Americans and the British traditionally use other countries and peoples as battering rams and do not get involved in direct conflict themselves.

    Well, I can only give them a standing ovation. No matter how it’s covered, it’s like they’re cowards, they don’t know how to do anything, and so on and so forth. Only we extinguish any fire or someone’s wishes with our citizens. Karabakh - send troops, Syria - hold Assad, Kazakhstan - don’t thank. But to start shaking up states or internal regions of countries is low for us, you see. The same Mexico, Latin countries, troubled regions of Spain, Italy, France, Germany and so on.
    1. +3
      24 January 2024 08: 21
      Quote: T-100
      But to start shaking up states or internal regions of countries is low for us, you see.

      Sergey, when (if) the ruble becomes the world reserve currency and we can print it on an industrial scale, your proposal will sparkle with new colors. hi
      1. +2
        24 January 2024 11: 31
        Yes, what does this have to do with it? We don’t have dollars to buy the rebels, smuggle weapons and ammunition to them and support them in every possible way. Declare them fighters against American neo-imperialism and also flog all sorts of nonsense (put your dog)
        1. +3
          24 January 2024 11: 49
          Quote: T-100
          Yes, what does this have to do with it? We don’t have dollars to buy the rebels, smuggle weapons and ammunition to them and support them in every possible way. Declare them fighters against American neo-imperialism and also flog all sorts of nonsense (put your dog)

          I’m afraid that the government will have to buy the overwhelming majority of local media, and only after that the “rebels.” In order for “a spark to ignite a flame,” you need to prepare the ground for this for a long time and persistently. Examples: Chechnya, Iraq, Libya, Baltic states, Ukraine. It worked out here.
          Anti-examples: Venezuela, Kazakhstan. Not much here.
          And, if you’re going to spoil some country, it’s better to do it quietly. And I have almost no doubt that something is being done on our part. So that life there doesn’t seem like honey to them.
          1. 0
            24 January 2024 12: 07
            Examples: Chechnya, Iraq, Libya, Baltic states, Ukraine. It worked out here.
            Anti-examples: Venezuela, Kazakhstan. Not much here.

            Look how many examples you gave, where they worked hard, but can we now show our work in examples? In addition, from your examples - Chechnya, the Baltic states, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, I would also add Georgia, this is all near our borders. I don’t remember that such work on our part was carried out along the perimeter of the US borders. We constantly play in defense and against defense. At the same time, the United States contributed to the collapse of our state, twice over the past just over a hundred years. They contributed to the collapse of the Russian Empire, then the USSR, now it’s the Russian Federation’s turn.
            1. 0
              24 January 2024 12: 44
              Quote: T-100
              I don’t remember that such work was carried out on our part

              That's right. That's what I'm talking about. We don’t have the money to buy governments, and buying rebels is ineffective. So we have to act with “homeopathic remedies”. To get the French in Africa to get their things out the door, to supply some freebies with grain, to allocate a quota for labor migrants, etc. on little things. And compare this with the amount of funds invested by the people themselves in anti-Russian activities. With our ruble and the current volume of our gold and foreign currency reserves, we will not be able to handle this at the moment. So, for now we just support unfriendly regimes. Then we will see. hi
            2. +2
              24 January 2024 14: 49
              It is not carried out because we do not know how and never have been able to. Case in point: the bombed and occupied Germans and Japanese adore the Americans. Eastern Europeans hate us fiercely.
              1. 0
                25 January 2024 09: 22
                Quote: Kmon
                Case in point: bombed and occupied Germans and Japanese adore the americans.

                If suddenly, by chance, we found a military base in Germany or Japan, we would also be adored.
                During the uprising in Czechoslovakia, our patrol and the GDR patrol stood on the neighboring streets (a friend of my father’s who served there told me). Ours stood about 10 people, in the German one there were 3 and two lines with chalk on the asphalt (the first one had “Stop” written on it). They threw stones and rubbish at ours and called us names. In German there was silence and calm.
                In the evening they asked the Czechs
                "What a ??????
                - there are Germans there! They will just shoot to kill behind the second line and that’s it...."
                If we behaved like Germans or Americans - like occupiers - maybe they would adore us. Try not to adore us - they’ll hit you in the forehead and that’s it...
                German prostitutes in the American zone in 1945-47 cost a dollar per day belay - no one messed around with the Germans there and didn’t let down the base about a friendly proletariat.
                And here they were blasé and attempted uprisings throughout almost the entire socialist camp (except for the Romanians - but that would have been absolutely vicious trash)...
                1. 0
                  25 January 2024 11: 50
                  We had bases throughout Eastern Europe. And all the Eastern Europeans quietly hated us (the Germans too) and fled at the first opportunity. But the Germans and Japanese sincerely adore Americans. They pray for American culture and way of life. The issue here is not at all about military bases, but about the effective reformatting of consciousness. And also in a significant increase in the well-being of citizens after the arrival of the Americans. But of course it’s easier to think that they are stupidly holding them at gunpoint. And 1945-47... You should have remembered the 44th. Better remember the Marshall Plan.
                  1. +1
                    25 January 2024 12: 25
                    Quote: Kmon
                    Better remember the Marshall Plan.

                    It was not intended to improve the well-being of citizens.
                    And ladies, we physically could not greatly improve the well-being of their citizens - too much was destroyed both here and there
                    1. 0
                      25 January 2024 15: 10
                      He restored the economy, and military spending also decreased due to the presence of American troops. As a result, the standard of living also increased.

                      Well, that’s one of the reasons why they didn’t like us so much; compared their lives and the lives of their Western neighbors.
                  2. -1
                    27 January 2024 01: 24
                    The Germans and Japanese will instantly hate the Americans if they break their necks in one way or another. They will remember everything right away. The Americans, of course, bring prosperity to some countries, but they brutally exploit most countries and smash some to pieces. All countries know about all this, even though Americans don’t perform any more economic miracles, but it’s a fact that punishment will follow immediately.
                    1. 0
                      27 January 2024 11: 31
                      They won’t hate it, just as the French didn’t hate it when American troops left their country. You simply have a poor understanding of the psychology of both. For several generations now, Americans have sincerely been considered benefactors.
                      1. 0
                        27 January 2024 13: 30
                        The French generally hate everyone, they have more ambition than the Poles. They're just toothless. And the Americans are not far behind them, if anything happens they will return quickly
  6. +6
    24 January 2024 08: 39
    A record 95,3% of Japanese residents said they “do not have friendly feelings” towards Russia.

    What difference does it make what feelings someone has for someone... politics and war are not about the feelings of the average person... If they asked the question whether the Japanese are ready to fight because of hostility towards Russia... I think that the percentage of those willing would be the opposite. Public opinion is formed by the ruling class, which pursues its own interests... Another question is the genius of our politicians and diplomats, who managed to ruin relations with the whole world, become completely dependent on China... and tied their hands in all directions... at the same time, we haven’t even created the prerequisites for the growth of key, vital areas... What an interesting future awaits us... And most importantly, what is our goal, what are we pursuing... what is this all for?
  7. -1
    24 January 2024 08: 49
    Japan does not have nuclear weapons, so they cannot be used against it. Just like in Ukraine.

    In fact, it is possible and necessary, due to the threat to the existence of Russia.
  8. +3
    24 January 2024 09: 23
    IMHO, no one will get involved with a country of 120 million in the conventional version. Moreover, if she has a serious Navy and Air Force. They will hit you immediately and hard. Well, maybe for starters they will demonstrate something on a desert island
  9. +1
    24 January 2024 09: 47
    I won’t hide that our feelings are mutual ((I don’t have any friendly feelings towards the Japanese

    especially if you look at the history of our relations and what they did in China during the Second World War

    and the aircraft carrier may be unsinkable, but it can easily be left without a crew and unsuitable for further habitation
  10. -1
    24 January 2024 09: 48
    Quote: Tucan
    A Russian nuclear strike will inevitably lead to confrontation with the United States. These countries are bound by a defense treaty, and the US military shares the same bases with the Japanese

    This idea is imposed and supported by the enemies “watching the colony”... Another question is whether we still have I.O. and who controls it...
  11. +4
    24 January 2024 09: 50
    I wonder how many Russian residents love their Motherland?
    1. +2
      24 January 2024 12: 36
      My opinion is 146%"""""""
  12. +6
    24 January 2024 11: 19
    What a horror, there are enemies all around, and even Russophobes... How to survive in this terrible Russophobic world? There are not enough nuclear batons for everyone... One thing is strange, how did the USSR survive? I didn’t break in anywhere, they invited me everywhere...to OK, they invited me to FIFA, UEFA, they invited me to FIFA or UEFA, the Soviet vice-president was there for a long time, but now they don’t invite me anywhere, they drive me away from everywhere...Everyone is bad, except the Chinese. . smile
    1. +2
      24 January 2024 11: 48
      “One thing is strange, how did the USSR survive? It didn’t break in anywhere, everyone was invited...to the OK, they were invited to FIFA, UEFA, they were invited to FIFA or UEFA, the Soviet vice-president was there for a long time.”
      This is a really, really interesting question. hi
      1. +5
        24 January 2024 12: 12

        But this is a really, very interesting question hi
        Quote from AdAstra
        “One thing is strange, how did the USSR survive? It didn’t break in anywhere, everyone was invited...to the OK, they were invited to FIFA, UEFA, they were invited to FIFA or UEFA, the Soviet vice-president was there for a long time.”
        But this is a really, very interesting question hi

        The USSR was a self-sufficient state, it had its own industry, science, education, sports were at the highest level... in the end, the ideology itself was attractive to many in the world... in general, comparing the USSR with the modern Russian Federation is the same as Japan with Zimbabwe.. alas, but now we are Zimbabwe and there is nothing except a nuclear club, diplomacy at the level of courtyard concepts.. but actually, whatever you spit.. there is nothing to compare with.. I think the reason why we have arrived is precisely in the absence of changes in power.. people have lost their objective perception of reality, they have gone crazy with permissiveness and don’t know what they are doing.
        1. +2
          24 January 2024 12: 17
          Probably, it’s not just the change of power or not only it. In the USSR, power was in the hands of the CPSU; in the SGA, power can also be said to be irreplaceable, at least in matters of foreign policy, despite all the ostentatious struggle that the Republicans and the Democrats, especially in recent years, give or take, are acting in the same direction, they are simply acting with different instruments . So there is still something else here. hi
          1. +5
            24 January 2024 12: 38
            Probably, it’s not just the change of power or not only it. In the USSR, power was in the hands of the CPSU; in the SGA, power can also be said to be irreplaceable, at least in matters of foreign policy

            In foreign policy, it was dominated by “if only there was no war” in the USSR, and now “we are all in heaven, heaven.” I don’t remember exactly the year, but it was at the end of Brezhnev’s reign, an initiative group of scientists came to him and asked to redistribute the budget and use part of the defense for the production of consumer goods, which actually could turn us into modern China... but Brezhnev then, being a front-line soldier, said... that the safety of citizens is higher than clothes and chewing gum...
            As for your question, here we need to look at the situation as a whole, the USSR had half the world of allies, the world was literally divided into two camps...now there are no allies at all...but the change of power, under capitalism, is the most important, if not the key factor .. capitalism is based on competition, which gives opportunity and entails responsibility.. (ideally) all this together should give rise to correct foreign and domestic policies.. but when there is no turnover, when there is telephone rights, when there is isolation from people.. then reality becomes not objective and fatal mistakes are made... In other words, pride is the soil for painful microbes that kill the body, not to be confused with pride)) hi
            1. +3
              24 January 2024 12: 43
              So you are basically right. Regarding the SGA in internal matters, yes, we can recognize the change of power, but on external issues - scratch a democrat and you will find a republican and vice versa.
              1. +5
                24 January 2024 12: 51
                So you are right. Regarding the SGA in internal matters, yes, we can recognize the change of power, but on external issues, scratch a democrat and you will find a republican and vice versa.

                Each state has its own interests, the USA has them literally all over the world, just like their corporations and the dollar are spread all over the world, hence the unanimity in foreign policy... Our interests are mainly hydrocarbons, millet, metals... mainly the mining industry. ... and trading natural resources is not difficult, it is difficult to create a product with high added value... if we were monopolists in the world, then we could still turn up our noses... but alas, this is not so...
            2. +4
              24 January 2024 14: 52
              Brezhnev was very mistaken. Minus a couple of tens of thousands of tanks or a dozen or two submarines would not have made a difference, but reforms following the Chinese model might have been successful.

              And do not confuse allies with satellites. Eastern Europe was loyal to the USSR only as long as there were Soviet tanks in it, it quickly and for a long time quarreled with China, the Africans pretended to adore Stalin, but when they received a freebie, they ran over to the United States at the first opportunity.
            3. +3
              24 January 2024 17: 54
              "In external politics prevailed “if only there was no war” in the USSR...
              I often heard these words as a child. From the older generation, who experienced the hardships of war. This is not government propaganda, but their life experience.
            4. 0
              27 January 2024 01: 32
              Quote: Svarog
              Brezhnev then, being a front-line soldier, said ... that the safety of citizens is higher than clothes and chewing gum

              but he didn’t forget about his life, he wasn’t a Spartan
              Quote: Svarog
              the USSR had half the world of allies, the world was literally divided into two camps

              Well, we had such allies, the Romanians got loans from Western banks and the French built nuclear power plants for them, the Czechs extracted gasoline from our oil and sold it to the West. Allies are those who are ready to fight shoulder to shoulder, only the Cubans were like that, well, maybe the Libyans, the rest were only within their own borders.
              Now, of course, everything is much worse, but now at least the Americans have managed to sway most of the world.
        2. -3
          24 January 2024 13: 45
          Quote: Svarog
          compare the USSR with the modern Russian Federation, the same as Japan and Zimbabwe... alas, but now we are Zimbabwe and there is nothing except a nuclear club
          The USSR was called “Upper Volta with rockets” in the West in the 80s. Your comparison of the Russian Federation with Zimbabwe (a much more developed country than Upper Volta) turns out not to be in favor of the USSR.
          1. +4
            24 January 2024 13: 48
            Quote: Stanislav_Shishkin
            The USSR was called “Upper Volta with rockets” in the West in the 80s. Their comparison of the Russian Federation with Zimbabwe (a much more developed country than Upper Volta) is not in favor of the USSR.

            It’s out of fear...and no one compared the USSR with Zimbabwe, don’t make it up...
            1. -4
              24 January 2024 13: 52
              Quote: Svarog
              and no one compared the USSR with Zimbabwe
              You just compared.
              1. +3
                24 January 2024 13: 54
                You compared.

                I compared modern Russia...and not the USSR
                1. -2
                  24 January 2024 13: 58
                  Once again: the USSR was compared to Upper Volta. You compared the Russian Federation with Zimbabwe, i.e. you are acting in the same direction as Western propagandists in the 80s regarding the USSR, but they chose a more powerful country for comparison with the Russian Federation.
                  1. +5
                    24 January 2024 14: 05
                    Once again: the USSR was compared to Upper Volta. You compared the Russian Federation with Zimbabwe, i.e. you are acting in the same direction as Western propagandists in the 80s regarding the USSR, but they chose a more powerful country for comparison with the Russian Federation.

                    Now I understand you. I believe that comparing the Russian Federation with Zimbabwe is objective... and the USSR was compared with Upper Volta because of fear... and above all because of fear of ideology... The West as a whole understood that until they openly attacked, the USSR would not fight.. but socialism evoked a feeling of aggression in them... because they had to make concessions for their own citizens, deal with benefits, insurance and other social security, in other words, spend money... for this the USSR was hated and feared. It's my personal opinion..
                    1. -3
                      24 January 2024 14: 13
                      Quote: Svarog
                      socialism caused them a feeling of aggression
                      Socialist Cuba, under their noses, does not provoke any aggression from the United States; they have been cooperating with China for a long time and successfully: they are not afraid of socialism, but of Russia - they were afraid then, and now. This aggression comes from fear.
                      1. +3
                        24 January 2024 14: 23
                        There is no point in comparing Cuba with the USSR... both in terms of resources and territory... In China there was no socialism as such... in the form that we have... And China itself was a backward state at that time .. But nevertheless, maybe you’re right... maybe we just cause animal fear in them)
                      2. -5
                        24 January 2024 14: 44
                        “They are afraid of our greatness” was also said in relation to the West and the Republic of Ingushetia. This, in my opinion, remains true both in relation to the USSR and in relation to the Russian Federation.
                      3. +4
                        24 January 2024 14: 46
                        “They are afraid of our greatness” was also said in relation to the West and the Republic of Ingushetia. This, in my opinion, remains true both in relation to the USSR and in relation to the Russian Federation.

                        In relation to the USSR, I agree, perhaps... although “greatness” is a concept based on something specific... and the USSR had this specific thing... But in relation to modern Russia, what is it... can you explain?
                      4. -1
                        24 January 2024 14: 58
                        Quote: Svarog
                        "greatness" is a concept based on something specific
                        Today, the Russian Federation remains the largest and resource-rich country in the world; we have powerful, combat-ready armed forces and, perhaps most importantly, we have the state (imperial) will to go our own way, without cowering under the hegemon as in the late 80s and 90s.
                      5. +3
                        24 January 2024 15: 09
                        We have the state (imperial) will to go our own way, without cowering under the hegemon as in the late 80s and 90s.

                        Stanislav..what foundation does the imperial path rest on? Maybe it’s demographics, or our industry is advanced... maybe we have success in medicine or in any other field... what an imperial path, on the bones of our own citizens... so citizens began to run out of 1 ml. or 20 ml of our guest workers every year path?
                      6. -4
                        24 January 2024 15: 37
                        Quote: Svarog
                        citizens began to run out
                        And they have been for a long time: since the time of Khrushchev, growth has been declining until it went into negative values ​​(loss). Throughout the 90s, we had a decline despite the squeezing out of Russians from many former Soviet republics in the Russian Federation. And since the 2000s we have seen an increase again. This is evidence of the people's trust in the state in which they live.
                      7. -3
                        24 January 2024 15: 53
                        Quote: Svarog
                        What foundation does the imperial path rest on?
                        State will, resources and multinationality. Even resources are not in the first place (some such resources were originally in Ancient Rome or Kievan Rus).
                      8. +1
                        27 January 2024 01: 34
                        They were so unafraid of Cuba that they staged a shameful invasion of Granada because of the Cuban airfield. The entire UN Security Council condemned them for this. Yes, there were times when the British and French voted against the USA
                    2. +3
                      24 January 2024 14: 58
                      The labor movement and concessions to workers began in the 19th century. The USSR simply accelerated this process.
        3. 0
          25 January 2024 09: 55
          Quote: Svarog
          I think the reason why we rolled into lack of change of power.. people have lost their objective perception of reality, they have gone crazy with permissiveness and don’t know what they are doing.

          Are you talking about the change of power?
          in the Russian Federation or the USSR? belay When is it only for takeaway?

          And yes, when Misha G. replaced the old ones from the Central Committee - then apparently the USSR immediately blossomed and began to sparkle with new colors?

          Who would talk about “change of power”, yeah....
          1. +1
            25 January 2024 23: 31
            Quote: your1970
            Are you talking about the change of power?
            in the Russian Federation or the USSR
            A series of illnesses and deaths of the top leaders of the USSR in the early 80s led to shifts in the perception of the power of the CPSU as the decrepit power of the “Kremlin elders,” which gave the people a political basis to demand change and the possibility of throwing the young populist Gorbachev to the top.
  13. +7
    24 January 2024 12: 55
    96% of Finns also reported a lack of “friendly feelings.” In general, this is a failure of the foreign policy of Putin and Lavrov, who fawned over their “partners” for many years and, in the end, remained in political isolation with nothing.
    1. 0
      24 January 2024 16: 37
      Quote: vet
      96% of Finns also reported a lack of “friendly feelings.” In general, this is a failure of the foreign policy of Putin and Lavrov
      Yeah, maybe it was the case that there used to be “achievements” in foreign policy: applause for Gorbachev, “friend Bill,” “friend Boris.” Admiration, friendship and love. School education and the media are no more difficult to brainwash Finns than any other nation. Ukrainians (re-shod Russians) will not let you lie.
      1. +4
        24 January 2024 17: 11
        Not only Finns. I'm sure surveys of Swedes, Italians, French, Germans, Spaniards, Koreans, etc. will give similar results. Something is definitely wrong with foreign policy; universal hatred does not appear out of the blue.
        1. 0
          24 January 2024 17: 18
          Not only Finns.

          What do Russians care about citizens who welcomed a violent change of power in another country? Maybe it's not about us, but about them?
        2. -1
          24 January 2024 17: 51
          Quote: Kmon
          I'm sure surveys of Swedes, Italians, French, Germans, Spaniards, Koreans, etc. will give similar results... universal hatred does not appear out of the blue.
          Ask the Chinese, North Koreans, residents of Africa, India, BV countries, Latin Americans... It will turn out to be the opposite. You are confusing cause and effect. The fact that the US vassals were well brainwashed by Russophobia is considered to be a reason for our foreign policy to turn to the East. And you went too far about “universal hatred”. My lack of friendly feelings towards the Swedes or Americans in no way means that I hate them.
          1. 0
            24 January 2024 19: 31
            However, before the SVO, the attitude was noticeably better, despite the fact that the influence of the United States was exactly the same. So this is probably not the case in the USA.

            Latin Americans, Africans and Indians, by the way, have a pretty good attitude towards the USA
            https://www.statista.com/statistics/807013/latam-perception-united-states-country/
            https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2023/08/29/indians-views-of-other-countries/
            https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2020/01/08/u-s-image-generally-favorable-around-the-world-but-mixed-in-some-countries/
            1. +1
              26 January 2024 09: 53
              Quote: Kmon
              However, before the SVO, the attitude was noticeably better, despite the fact that the influence of the United States was exactly the same.
              Mark Twain also urged not to trust American statistics. You cite a bunch of American statistics, from which the statement regarding Russia “before the North Military District the attitude was noticeably better” is not extracted. India has a particularly positive attitude towards Russia and Putin, and the supply of our gas is more important to them than our conflict with Ukraine... Do you want to interpret this as “a good attitude in exchange for Russian oil and gas”? You and I clearly have a conflict of interpretations, even if we both trusted their statistics.
              1. 0
                26 January 2024 16: 54
                These were statistics in relation to the United States, refuting that those listed above do not like them. And here are comparative statistics for Russia. It is noticeable that recently the attitude has deteriorated sharply

                https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2015/08/05/russia-putin-held-in-low-regard-around-the-world/
                https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2020/12/16/views-of-russia-and-putin-remain-negative-across-14-nations/
                https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2023/07/10/overall-opinion-of-russia/
        3. 0
          28 January 2024 00: 44
          Quote: Kmon
          Not only Finns. I'm sure surveys of Swedes, Italians, French, Germans, Spaniards, Koreans, etc. will give similar results. Something is definitely wrong with foreign policy; universal hatred does not appear out of the blue.

          But Mexicans do not like Americans and vice versa, the French do not like the British, the Catalans do not like the Spaniards, the Russians do not like the Americans, the Poles do not like the Ukrainians, the Afghans do not like the Americans, the Arabs do not like the Jews, and so on...
          The list is sooooo long - who ate all of whose baldness
  14. 0
    24 January 2024 13: 31
    Among our neighbors there are not many countries left where they treat us with sympathy or trust. We are increasingly turning into a fortress besieged by enemies; we need to arm ourselves more and more and spend more and more money on defense.

    The more we arm ourselves, the more we are feared and hated. Seeing the hatred and fear of our neighbors, we believe that our neighbors increasingly want to destroy us and therefore we need to arm ourselves even more.

    And we always look for the reason for fear and hatred towards us outside of ourselves, and do not find this reason there.
    1. +1
      24 January 2024 18: 19
      Quote: S.Z.
      And we are always looking for the reason for fear and hatred of us outside of ourselves
      This is their fear and hatred. I can look for the reason for my contempt for them in myself, but their fear and hatred are their problems, let them sort themselves out.
      1. -3
        25 January 2024 07: 53
        Quote: Stanislav_Shishkin
        This is their fear and hatred. I can look for the reason for my contempt for them in myself, but their fear and hatred are their problems, let them sort themselves out.


        If we had not armed ourselves in response and organized life as in the garrison of a besieged fortress, then we could have ignored our neighbors. But we invest in guns instead of butter.
        1. +3
          25 January 2024 09: 40
          Quote: S.Z.
          If we had not armed ourselves in response and organized life as in the garrison of a besieged fortress
          Is this about Israel? If Russia had not armed itself in response, it would not have existed long ago, only the Republic of Ingushetia, the USSR and the Russian Federation never lived in a “besieged fortress”, but included in their composition different peoples who acquired equal rights here with the Russians, or looked for and found allies .
          1. 0
            25 January 2024 10: 39
            Quote: Stanislav_Shishkin
            The Republic of Ingushetia, the USSR and the Russian Federation never lived in a “besieged fortress”, but included in their composition different peoples who acquired equal rights here with the Russians, or sought and found allies.


            Until recently this was the case. But today we are increasingly becoming a besieged fortress.

            Our peoples are equal, that’s true. Russia is not a country for Russians, it is a country for Russians.
            1. +1
              25 January 2024 10: 44
              Quote: S.Z.
              Until recently this was the case.
              If you haven’t noticed, today the people of the former Ukraine are being accepted into the Russian Federation. This does not happen in besieged fortresses. An example of a “besieged fortress” is Israel. In it, the Palestinians are driven out of the “fortress walls”, and there are only enemies around.
              1. -1
                25 January 2024 12: 54
                Actually, we became a besieged fortress after this very foray. Are there only friends around us? More like one than alone...

                By the way, the same people of the former Ukraine are not only accepted inside our fortress, but also often strive to set fire to something inside or even blow it up.
                1. 0
                  26 January 2024 10: 21
                  Quote: S.Z.
                  By the way, the same people of the former Ukraine are not only accepted inside our fortress, but also often strive to set fire to something inside or even blow it up.
                  Does this somehow remind you of the times of the German occupation of the Ukrainian SSR?
                  The partisans operating in Kyiv and the surrounding area liquidated more than 30 thousand Nazis and their henchmen, derailed 259 railway trains, defeated 103 German garrisons, and attacked 249 police commandant's offices. 333 ammunition depots were destroyed, 282 district village councils were destroyed
                  There are individual enemies recruited by the SBU, but it could not be otherwise. And your “often tries to set fire to something inside or even explode” is based on how many cases, including attempts at sabotage? In my opinion, you want to wishful thinking.
                  1. 0
                    26 January 2024 11: 49
                    Someone deceived you, I absolutely do not want saboteurs or anyone else to spoil our lives - our city is too close to the border and we just see some things. I won’t talk about them so as not to help my enemies.

                    This cannot be reminiscent of the times of the Nazis, since the scale is completely different. However, it is a fact that our neighbors today are our enemies. And the fact that the people of the neighboring country basically hate us is also, unfortunately, a fact. Many of my friends have relatives there - communication stopped on the initiative of these relatives.

                    No need to fool yourself.
                    1. 0
                      26 January 2024 11: 53
                      Quote: S.Z.
                      Many of my friends have relatives there - communication stopped on the initiative of these relatives
                      Probably, these relatives at some point realized that such communication was unsafe for them. I can even assume that before the break in relations they shouted/wrote “glory to Ukraine,” but what does that have to do with the “many people who want” to set fire to something in the Russian Federation, blow it up...
                      1. -1
                        26 January 2024 12: 52
                        Quote: Stanislav_Shishkin
                        Quote: S.Z.
                        Many of my friends have relatives there - communication stopped on the initiative of these relatives
                        Probably, these relatives at some point realized that such communication was unsafe for them. I can even assume that before the break in relations they shouted/wrote “glory to Ukraine,” but what does that have to do with the “many people who want” to set fire to something in the Russian Federation, blow it up...


                        Blessed is he who believes.

                        However, our government agrees more with me than with you.

                        The law on deprivation of citizenship for new citizens, adopted not so long ago, is proof of this.

                        You can also read our military officers, they say the same thing.

                        Even our propaganda does not raise the issue of repression in Ukraine for communicating with relatives. They were definitely brainwashed there. They had time for this.
  15. +4
    24 January 2024 14: 02
    Japan does not have nuclear weapons, so they cannot be used against it

    Mark my words, all these “don’ts” will wipe out your ass as soon as there is a serious smell of gunpowder in the air. I don’t think that the system that rewrote the constitution with such ease will reflect for a long time because of some paper layers regulating the use of nuclear weapons. Threat to territorial integrity? Sinking of a significant part of the Pacific Fleet? Massive strike on military bases? Receive and sign N-kilotons.

    Japan, yes, is a threat, and a significant one. These little jackals are just waiting for the right moment to bite hard and tear off a piece. Not everyone understands the essence of the Japanese nation - and history demonstrates this essence very well, for all nations, by the way. But they have it absolutely clearly expressed.

    However, their last raid did not go well and ended badly. So they've been in sheep's clothing for a while now and will be very careful. Moreover, Japan is clearly unlucky with the atom more than others.

    As for “love or not,” people, damn it, don’t always love their neighbors or relatives. What kind of love is there between peoples? Complete nonsense. Peoples compete with each other, propaganda pumps people up with contempt and motives of historical revisionism. There will be no trace of love, and it is pointless to evaluate this. The connections between France and the Republic of Ingushetia on the eve of the war with Napoleon were significant - well? Now, we had significant ties with Ukraine until 2014 - well, that’s it?

    We don’t need to strive for someone to love us there - everything that is important to us is inside the Russian Federation. We need to love ourselves first.
    1. +1
      24 January 2024 15: 12
      Quote: Knell Wardenheart
      I don’t think that the system that rewrote the constitution with such ease will reflect for a long time because of some paper layers regulating the use of nuclear weapons.

      In my opinion, an unsuccessful comparison, both in action and in consequences.
      1. +1
        24 January 2024 15: 29
        Actions ? Actions depend on the general paradigm of thinking. In our case, it is like this - for us the rules are a kind of external screen, a functional imitation like an antique craft, at the same time combining low-level functionality and an imitation essence. To solve the issue, Gov like "garbage" will do. And when dealing with serious issues, we quite easily and blindly reject the inviolability of the rules, preferring to decide with the Law. It was necessary - they rewrote the constitution for this person, they should have changed the retirement age, they should have carried out mobilization without war - do you still doubt that if we have the desire, we will adhere to any rules? :)

        Consequences ? The United States used nuclear weapons on two Japanese cities - were there any consequences other than Japan's withdrawal from the war? A large-scale attack on a nuclear power with the threat of loss of territory - what else needs to happen for us to unpack tactical nuclear weapons?:) Attack of the Martians? I don't know, zombie apocalypse? You see, this weapon takes a lot to maintain, it has been lying around for a long time, and there is a lot of it. Like a gun on a wall, sooner or later it will be used; it does not exist for beauty. This is not a ceremonial checker. For many decades, our security was based on the paradigm of “nuclear deterrence”, both by Presence and Terror. Availability showed that we have it and a lot of it, and Horror showed “in colors” what would happen if we applied it.
        Over time, the Horror factor has somehow worn out, there have been no tests for a long time, the thesis about “nuclear winter” has been repeatedly eroded in the media, and in general, tactical nuclear weapons have become much weaker than they were in kilotonnage.
        You can deny this factor, but all this brings you, willingly or unwillingly, closer to its real use in case of emergency.
        Its non-use in the event of a major conflict will only increase the likelihood of its use in the future, since the Horror factor will be significantly reduced if it is not used and the conflict is blown out.

        This is all logic, there is no morality or any long-term considerations. The current world is divided and hardened, it is simply impossible not to notice this.
        1. -1
          24 January 2024 15: 41
          Apparently I couldn’t get my point across in the previous post.
          Quote: Knell Wardenheart
          And when dealing with serious issues, we quite easily and blindly reject the inviolability of the rules...

          I meant the difference between "internal political" ( wassat ) and foreign policy component. But she exists, and what a one!
          Quote: Knell Wardenheart
          Consequences ?

          Arising from the first point. “Domestic political” - almost none, and foreign policy (and we treat them quite “respectfully”) when nuclear weapons are used, there is a high probability of TMB. Not everyone here wants to “go to heaven” (even though they say so), they feel good here too.
          If you think that I am a humanist and an opponent of the use of nuclear weapons, then you are deeply mistaken. “Nothing personal, just business (rationality).”
          1. +2
            24 January 2024 16: 16
            Perhaps you are right. But I also look at the fact that over the years we have had many statements that the West was incompetent, deceived us, etc. There is a growing demand for some kind of "satisfaction" in this matter. I cannot evaluate this request at the top, but its existence does not give me any doubt. This “satisfaction” factor has historically pushed the elite to take rather drastic actions. Within the framework of the thinking “the whole West is against us and we need to show it,” Japan as a target of an attack has its advantages - Japan’s neighbors do not like it, it is considered part of the “Western world” but is not a member of NATO.
            This does not mean at all that nuclear weapons necessarily would be used in a conflict with Japan - but its use is significantly higher than in any other regional cross-border conflict. Including because of our ability to project other types of power in the European direction, for example. In the Far East, we have forces inferior to the Japanese - in the event of their preemptive strike, this proportion will worsen even more.
            1. +1
              24 January 2024 18: 22
              Quote: Knell Wardenheart
              But I also look at the fact that over the years we have had many statements that the West was incompetent, deceived us, etc. There is a growing demand for some kind of "satisfaction" in this matter.

              In my opinion, this position is purely for “internal” use, while for external use there are only “red” lines and “concerns”, the number of which is already indecently large.
              Quote: Knell Wardenheart
              This does not mean that nuclear weapons would necessarily be used in a conflict with Japan - but its use is significantly higher than in any other regional trans-border conflict.

              I have a post higher up in the thread on this topic. Take a look if you're interested hi
              1. 0
                29 January 2024 09: 13
                Quote: Adrey
                In my opinion, this position is purely for “internal” use, while for external use there are only “red” lines and “concerns”, the number of which is already indecently large.

                In the European theater of operations, a strike on some Poland will force the rest of NATO to join in - but at the same time, the United States may remain on the sidelines and withdraw itself. Simply because we won’t put up with a conventional war with NATO and will destroy nuclear weapons.
                Only the United States can join the Far East - and only with non-nuclear forces, otherwise this is TMB in all its glory. It is obvious that in response to a conditional nuclear strike on a conditional Vladivostok, we will strike Washington.
  16. +4
    24 January 2024 14: 30
    The Americans and the British traditionally use other countries and peoples as battering rams and do not get involved in direct conflict themselves. In the European theater there is a mutual depletion of the two parts of the Russian civilization-world - Great and Little Rus'. In the Far East, the Anglo-British tandem traditionally uses Japan against Russia and China.
    “True patriots” did not even know about this until February 24, 2022! But their eyes were opened that their money was under mortal threat and now!!!!! What now? Never mind! Everything remains as it was for the oligarchs and officials. And the villas are there, and the children are there, and the money is there. And we were here without anything / and we remained. Only now the Russian Federation is leading the Northern Military District to ensure that it stays that way. And the West is leading the Northern Military District to spread rot on the Russian Federation. And the children are there. "The gentlemen are fighting, the slaves' forelocks are cracking."
    1. -2
      24 January 2024 17: 33
      Quote: AKuzenka
      Everything remains as it was for the oligarchs and officials. And the villas are there, and the children are there, and the money is there. And we were here without anything / and we remained. Only now the Russian Federation is leading the Northern Military District to ensure that it stays that way. And the West is leading the Northern Military District to spread rot on the Russian Federation.
      Your logic is pathologically stalled: why carry out military operations, so that the warring parties can maintain the status quo (according to your version: so that the West continues to spread rot on the Russian Federation). The United States has successfully spread rot and continues to spread rot both Europe and Central Europe without any SVO. Is this not possible with the Russian Federation?
      1. +1
        24 January 2024 19: 19
        The United States has successfully spread rot and continues to spread rot both Europe and Central Europe without any SVO. Is this not possible with the Russian Federation?
        Alas for the Russian Federation. Only military force. Because Europe is still its own for the United States, and the Russian Federation is a raw materials colony. Markets are saturated, profits are falling, competitors (China) are closing in on their heels, it’s time to stop paying crazy amounts of money for raw materials and just take everything almost for free. Since you understand economics so well, look at what the United States did with 404. They have already paid for all the arms supplies for them 5 times.
        your logic is pathologically stalled: why carry out military operations so that the warring parties can maintain the status quo
        One of the most profitable industries is the military, especially if someone needs ammunition and equipment in large quantities and constantly. Yes, if you haven’t noticed, the United States is not conducting military operations on 404, but is constantly receiving profits from supplies. Well, how did logic stop stalling? The same principle works both ways. Of course, it’s not my status to know how much the Russian Federation, after the start of the Northern Military District, began to spend on military commissariat, but logic dictates that the owners of factories producing military equipment and ammunition are not at a loss at all.
  17. +1
    24 January 2024 15: 26
    Japan does not have nuclear weapons, so they cannot be used against it.

    So from that moment on I became wary, since when has such nonsense been written into our nuclear doctrine? Personally, I perceive such statements as extremism
  18. +2
    24 January 2024 18: 57
    As long as there is a Strategic Missile Forces, the negative attitude of the Japanese is the problem of the Japanese themselves)))
  19. +1
    24 January 2024 22: 41
    Code of Bushido, honor of the samurai? The people turned out to be mean-spirited. It turns out that there is only one way to “be friends” with them - the American way! You drop an A-bomb, or better yet several and silk ones at once. Maybe we need to finally understand and accept the fact that good relations with any people or country are based not on honesty and nobility, not on complementarity, but on the weight of the available club or the number of motivated, well-armed and trained divisions. Of course, goodwill and a long-term sequence of actions will have the desired result, but it takes a very long time for this to happen.
    1. 0
      25 January 2024 00: 35
      It's not about the bomb. The Japanese began to live much better after the war than before the war, and this is why they love Americans. Plus they protected them for free.
    2. -1
      25 January 2024 07: 57
      Relations with the people of a neighboring country are built on profit and fear. No one will “make friends” at their own expense - there is not a single reason for this. In general, there are relations between countries - mutually beneficial or not - and there is no “friendship”. Never was, is not now and will not be in the future.
  20. +1
    25 January 2024 12: 57
    "Japan does not have nuclear weapons, so they cannot be used against it"
    Why such a strange conclusion? Russian nuclear strategy says nothing of the sort. A threat to the existence of a country and a nation is a reason to use nuclear weapons, but whether the enemy has one does not matter.
  21. +1
    25 January 2024 13: 12
    “Japan does not have nuclear weapons, therefore” it can and should be used against it. In any case, it should be indicated that if they twitch, it will be applied. Let them think
    1. 0
      26 January 2024 08: 51
      Quote: borey
      Let them think

      OK, they’ll come up with their own nuclear weapons in six months. Moreover, they will organize a nuclear race with China in the style of the USSR in the 70s, so that the whole world will fall into ruin.

      What will you think next?
  22. BAI
    +2
    25 January 2024 18: 12
    Japan does not have nuclear weapons, so they cannot be used against it.

    Why was the author so frightened that he gave out such a maxim?
    Has the author tried to look at the nuclear doctrine of the Russian Federation?
    A nuclear strike is possible if there is a threat of defeat in a conventional war
    The author believes that nuclear powers should only fight among themselves? From the author’s philosophy it follows that this is the case, otherwise the presence of nuclear weapons is generally not known why it is needed.
    I can remind you that the only use of nuclear weapons was against a non-nuclear state.
    The United States, it turns out, did not know that it could not use nuclear weapons. And they applied it.
  23. -3
    25 January 2024 21: 32
    Japan does not have nuclear weapons, so they cannot be used against it. Just like in Ukraine.


    Yes, Russia no longer has any nuclear weapons, has this not reached the local people yet? That is why our Kremlin colonial administration does not like this whole nuclear topic so much! They can’t even just resume nuclear tests (they don’t want to), because then it will become clear to everyone that all nuclear weapons were taken away or deactivated by the Americans in the 90s, when the country lay under their feet and they could do whatever they wanted.
  24. -1
    26 January 2024 11: 40
    These are Asian countries. Their nationalism and contempt for their neighbors is off the charts. Everyone has long-standing bloody grudges against each other. These 95.% of Japanese hate Chinese and Koreans and other foreigners. 95% of Chinese hate Japanese and Koreans, etc. 95% of Koreans hate Japanese and Chinese, etc. foreigners. Once the white people leave the region, these countries will be at each other's throats. By the way, there are also differences between South Korea and Japan because of the island. Dokdo Island (Takeshima). Some useful resource was suddenly discovered in that region and both countries became concerned about the territorial ownership of the island.
  25. 0
    28 January 2024 10: 00
    Japan does not have nuclear weapons, so they cannot be used against it. Just like in Ukraine. Only ground forces, air force and navy.

    Very strange logic. This is also why nuclear weapons cannot be used against Japan? If there is a basis in accordance with Russia’s strategic documents in the field of a nuclear strike, it is possible and necessary.
  26. 0
    29 January 2024 07: 12
    Japan is some kind of misunderstanding in the composition of Humanity.
    Probably due to the location of the country, on elongated islands.
    The Japanese have a constantly present Schizo.
    If only we could live in peace.....
    This “Bugs” complex from the gateway haunts the sixth point.
    The Japanese need a simple, understandable explanation that this is the 21st century. And in order to “not get dirty” with the Japs, only THREE nuclear warheads are enough, and maybe THREE Poseidons. (This is not Hiroshima and Nagasaki).
    There will be no "Major or Minor" damage to Japan's "economy" after this.
    There will be another, new desert “Yapo”....... For 100 or 200 years.