Partisan artillery. RPG-7 in local armed conflicts

38
Partisan artillery. RPG-7 in local armed conflicts

Republic of Tajikistan, Kurgan-Tyube front, December 1992 (the author observes)


Along with the Kalashnikov assault rifle, which is well-known all over the world, it is no less popular, referring to another type. weapons, hand-held anti-tank grenade launcher RPG-7. The wide geography of its combat use in the Near and Middle East, the African continent, in Southeast Asia, Latin America indicates the reliability of this grenade launcher in any geographic zone. It is reliable in the jungle, highland, mountain-desert and desert areas - in conditions of significant influence of adverse environmental factors. Adopted by the Armed Forces of the USSR in the 1961 year, it is used in the armed forces of more than 40 states, and in some countries its mass production has been established.
The design of the RPG-7 is so simple and reliable that since its mass production only used ammunition has been improved. Domestic industry produces only anti-tank cumulative grenades PG-7В, PG-7ВМ, PG-7ВЛ, PG-7ВР (combat unit of tandem type). But there are fragmentation grenades (above-caliber and caliber) of Arabic and Chinese manufacture.


Frag grenades (above-caliber and caliber) of Arab and Chinese production


As the most acceptable anti-tank weapon for the majority of illegal armed groups (irregular armed formations), RPG-7 in the context of local military conflicts had a significant impact on the development of their tactics. Moreover, in Afghanistan and other hot spots, where the formation of the AMF - All Mojahedeen Force (the United Mojahedin Force) is involved in the armed conflict, has accumulated vast experience and a clear system of its combat use has been developed.
With the introduction of Soviet troops into Afghanistan in December 1979, the opposition’s armed forces had to face a significant number of armored vehicles - especially armored personnel carriers and infantry fighting vehicles, opposing only a small number of anti-tank weapons. Considering the organizational structure of various groups, detachments and fronts of the armed Afghan opposition from 1979 to 1989, it is easy to detect a tendency to increase the saturation of formations with grenade launchers. So, in 1983 – 1985, one grenade launcher fell on 10 – 12 fighters, and by 1987, the same number of personnel already had two RPG-7 grenade launchers.
Separate anti-tank and special groups armed RPGs based on 50 – 80% of personnel and totaled up to 15 grenade launchers. In the face of a shortage of artillery or the impossibility of its use, an additional task was assigned to the RPG-7 for “artillery” support of military operations, which in some episodes of the battle was carried out more efficiently than by artillery fire. This explains the fact that in the infantry department of the Iranian Armed Forces (11 people) since the war with Iraq, there are two RPG-7 in service.
When conducting a battle in a closed area (mountains, forest, jungle, settlements), the warring parties, as a rule, separate only a few tens of meters. In such conditions when artillery fire and aviation It also poses a threat to its troops, RPGs become an indispensable firearm, and the presence of an optical sight makes firing from it particularly accurate and safe for their units.
The Vietnamese called the tactic of tying the enemy with a melee attack by the term “grabbing the belt”; the Afghan Mujahideen used it everywhere, especially effectively and often in the “green zone” and high mountains. Thanks to similar tactics in both cases, the enemy (American and Soviet troops, respectively) lost their main advantage - artillery and aviation fire. Ignorance and ignoring of this tactic led to the decision not to include grenade launchers (RPG-7, RPG-16) in the staff of the special forces OXV troops in the RA (limited contingent of Soviet troops in the Republic of Afghanistan).


A small trick was used to suppress the firing points of the Mujahideen in the high mountains - firing slightly above the shelters located on the mountain slopes, taking into account the defeat of the enemy by shrapnel and a blast wave of a torn grenade


Their absence was partly compensated for by the presence in the companies of special forces of flame-throwers armed with RPO-A “Bumblebee” - highly effective in combat capabilities, but too heavy for autonomous actions of special forces groups in the mountains, as well as the use of RPG-18 and RPN-22 rocket grenades.
I would like to recall the 53-mm RPG-16 “Strike” (sighting range - 800 meters), which was in the 1970-80-ies in service of the airborne units of the Soviet Army and is considered unjustly removed from service. I personally managed to arm my special forces group with non-standard RPN-16 in the company and effectively use it in 1985 – 1987 during the fighting in the provinces of Nangarhar, Kunar, Laghman (eastern Afghanistan). Moreover, a small trick was used to suppress the firing points of the Mujahideen in the high mountains - firing is somewhat higher than the shelters located on the slopes of the mountains, taking into account the defeat of the enemy by shrapnel and a blast wave of a torn grenade. By the way, many divisions of OKSV in RA widely used captured RPG-7 Chinese (“Type 69”), as well as Arab production, lighter than domestic ones, equipped with bipod and carrying handle.


In the province of Laghman, Alishang kishlak, an 7 man was injured by an anti-tank grenade launcher when a mortally wounded group commander was evacuated from under fire.


The widespread use of the Afghan Mujahideen RPG-7 inevitably led to an increase in losses in the personnel of the SSNV from the fire of grenade launchers, including on foot operations. For example, 13.03.87 in the province of Laghman, Alishang village, an 7 man was injured by an anti-tank grenade launcher when a mortally wounded group commander, 4.09.87 in the Kunar province, was hit by two RPG grenades into the flat roof of the house (shooting was conducted from above) 11 people inside the house received fragmental wounds and contusions.
Fire from an anti-tank grenade launcher in openly located manpower with the use of cumulative ammunition gives a satisfactory result of destruction by shrapnel and a blast wave of personnel in a radius of up to 4 meters and has an additional demoralizing effect. An example of achieving a high mental effect from the massive use of RPG-7 fire in terms of manpower can be considered the fall of the so-called “Panj Front” (Tajikistan), when during the release of November 22 1992 by armed detachments of the Tajik opposition together with the Afghan Mujahideen of the Pyanj-Kurgan-Tyube highway for each shot of small arms from the opposite side, an 2 – 3 shot from an RPG (in most cases unimportant) followed.
Speaking of massaging RPG fire, we should mention the special groups of grenade launchers that I first encountered in Tajikistan in the autumn of the 1992 year (similar groups were used in both Afghanistan and Chechnya). In Tajikistan, the so-called “Namangan” group of 25 – 30 religious fanatics had a man armed with RPG-12 grenade launchers and RPG-7 and RPG-18 rocket launchers before 26.


Defeat in Tajikistan tanks T-72 in the rear of the tower after shooting down the first box of property


The peculiarity of the group’s tactics was the destruction of armored vehicles of the People’s Front of Tajikistan by consistently concentrating fire on two or three RPGs on one armored vehicle from 20 – 50 meters, and faced with T-72 tanks equipped with elements of dynamic protection (DZ), the first rocket launcher (operated in pairs ) shot down a DZ, and the second hit the tank in the unprotected part of the armor. The nature of the defeat of the tanks indicated that firing, apart from cumulative grenades, was also carried out by fragmentation, in the frontal part, for disabling optical observation devices (sights) with the aim of "blinding" the crew.
By firing at a very close distance, the grenade launcher, with reliable fire cover from the enemy infantry, is capable of producing an accurate aimed shot at the most vulnerable point of the armored object. This explains the defeat of T-72 tanks in Tajikistan to the rear of the tower after knocking out a box with property with a first shot, hitting a cumulative cannon jet, a direct hit by a fragmentation grenade into the driver’s observation device (determined from the fuse remains in triplex glass), followed by a defeat fragments of devices located on the tower.
In all cases of defeat of the T-72 tank from a hand-held grenade launcher, the crews remained intact, except for the case of a grenade hitting the rear of the tower (gunner and tank commander were seriously injured), but the tanks were removed from the battlefield, as they needed to be restored. RPG-7 for modern tanks, and with the advent of the PG-7BP "Resume" grenade with a tandem type warhead, all modern types of armored vehicles can be reliably hit.
With the defeat of the armored vehicle by a cumulative grenade, the factors affecting the crew are excessive pressure, fragments of armor and a cumulative jet. But taking into account the adoption by the crew of measures precluding the formation of excessive pressure inside the machine, such as the opening of hatches and loopholes, fragments of armor and a cumulative jet remain the factors affecting personnel. On a person, the striking effect of the cumulative jet inside the armored vehicle is at a distance of up to two and a half meters, and fragments - for the entire length of the internal space.
Good protection against RPG fire with conventional cumulative ammunition (PG-7В type grenades, PG-7ВЛ) on modern armored vehicles provide spaced booking, anti-cumulative screens and dynamic protection elements. That is why it is necessary to concentrate the fire of several RPGs and other anti-tank weapons on one armored vehicle in order to defeat it reliably, which is confirmed by the tactics of actions of the AMF formations during the local armed conflicts of recent decades.
In most cases, the intensive firing of automatic small arms by an assistant grenade launcher and other shooters contributes to accurate RPG firing in order to force enemy infantry to stop monitoring the battlefield and aimed fire, as well as to destroy the optical sights of enemy combat vehicles. This allows the grenade launcher without too much fuss, and less likely to be hit, to take a favorable firing position, determine the aiming point, and after the shot quickly and imperceptibly change firing position.


Well mask the firing position of a grenade launcher overgrown with tall shrubs, reeds, maize and other grass plants more than two meters high


When firing at one target of two or three RPGs, shooting is sometimes performed without a mandatory change after each firing position shot, especially if the target is hit by the first shots. Very often in such situations, rocket launchers enter into unhealthy excitement and, forgetting about the precautionary measures, pay dearly for it. For example, the “Namangan” group during October-December 1992 of the year was completely destroyed by the price of two burned-down BTR-70, as well as three damaged T-72 and one BTR-80.
When arranging ambushes, one of the main methods of conducting combat operations of irregular formations, to reduce dusting and unmasking a firing position at the moment of firing from an RPG and other jet weapons, the choice of advantageous firing position is very important. With time and conditions, it was usually specially prepared - the ground was watered. The firing position of a grenade launcher is well massed by thickets of high bushes, reeds, corn crops and other grassy plants over two meters high. It should be remembered that in the direction of shooting there should be no vegetation that impedes the flight of grenades (in order to prevent the grenade from detonating when grazing branches and grass, the safety cap is not removed from the fuse).


Given the availability of time and conditions, the firing position was specially prepared by watering the soil with water.


Despite the observance of measures to reduce dust formation, the firing position of the grenade launcher at the time of the shot is unmasked by a characteristic flash and white-gray smoke. If you are on the battlefield from the opposite side noticed such a flash, then the most rational action of yours will be a warning shout “flash” (“lie down”, “shot”) provided that the co-workers know what to do with this command - lie down on the ground (for shelter) and cover the ears with your hands.
In my practice there was a case when noticing an 350 – 400 meter flash RPG-7 shot from a distance of 4, I gave the command to “lie down” to a nearby subordinate and a grenade exploded in the XNUMX-meters (on a level platform) did not harm anyone. But the grenade launcher was not lucky, he never did the second shot, since he “forgot” to change the firing position ...
A serious threat to the RPG-7 fire is for helicopters, especially at the time of landing personnel and cargo by landing method, evacuation of the wounded and other cases related to landing on the territory controlled by the enemy. In January, 1986, two of the six helicopters parachuting personnel, during a raid by a special unit on the fortified area "Command" north of the city of Jalalabad (Afghanistan) were damaged by RPG-7 fire. Because of the density of the fire, the entire detachment failed to land, since, in addition to the two helicopters damaged at the time of landing, the fire from the RPG was conducted along airplanes.


The explosions in the air from the self-destruct grenade PG-7 and MANPADS missiles are identical in appearance


In a flying RPG helicopter, it is effective only in frontal firing from a distance of up to 100 meters, as well as when firing at the range of the self-killer of a cumulative grenade - 700 – 800 meters. The latter type of fire, despite the low probability of hitting the helicopter, still represents a danger to it and forces the crew to take additional precautions. Including a great height, which in all cases eliminates the surprise factor when helicopter fire strikes and landing of personnel, makes it difficult to conduct aerial reconnaissance. Moreover, the explosions in the air from the PG-7 grenade self-destructor and the rocket of the portable anti-aircraft missile system are identical in appearance, which makes it difficult for the crew to choose the right solution for the helicopter crews (pilots of attack aircraft) and the commanders of the units operating on the ground.
Another non-standard method of firing an RPG-7 anti-tank grenade launcher in local conflicts is a mounted trajectory fire using both fragmentation and cumulative grenades. With the exception of the use of fragmentation grenades, it is not as effective as direct fire, and is used mainly to conduct disturbing fire at area targets. The “nuisance” of this type of shooting, like during a mortar attack, is the difficulty of determining the firing position of the grenade launcher, especially in closed areas.


The Mujahideen used in combat no more than two or three grenades, preferring to wear one in the barrel, and the other on the shoulder using a rope belt device.


Between specialists, the disputes about the amount of portable ammunition for the RPG-7 do not abate. The set of the grenade launcher includes two bags for carrying shots for two and three grenades for the arrow-grenade launcher and his assistant, respectively, which means that there are five shots in the ammunition. I believe that it is this amount that is the golden mean that should be taken as a basis for conducting a military operation.


For carrying the shots were used amphibious backpacks RD-54, grenades in which were carried in the side pockets head down. Sometimes, for masking, the shots were put in pairs in fabric covers specially made for this purpose.


The Afghan mojahedin observed that only rarely did one grenade launcher use more than two or three grenades in combat, preferring to wear one in the barrel and the other on the shoulder using gadgets from a rope belt (this was the way grenades were carried by the grenade mate or ammunition carriers).
The method of carrying grenades on a belt is unsuitable in areas with a humid climate, since the paper insulation of the powder charge is easily damaged, which leads to a deterioration in firing accuracy due to dampness of the powder, and most often to a complete unsuitability of the powder charge. Portable bags for shots from Afghans were not popular, and we preferred another “container”.
Using RPG-7 and RPN-16 in Afghanistan as a reinforcement of special forces groups, wearable ammunition for grenade launchers consisted of 6 – 12 shots, depending on the conditions of the combat mission, and, following the example of the Mujahideen, the grenade launchers were always pre-loaded, and for carrying the shots used more acceptable amphibious backpacks RD-54, grenades in which were carried in the side pockets head down. Sometimes, for masking, the shots were placed in pairs in fabric covers specially made for this purpose (cropped sleeves or leg of an old field uniform) and fastened to backpacks with ties.
After all that has been said about the veteran grenade launcher, it remains only to lament that the lack of fragmentation, incendiary smoke, lighting and other special ammunition remains a significant drawback of the Russian RPG-7. They would significantly expand the range of capabilities of the units of the Russian Army.
38 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    30 November 2012 09: 12
    Good article! The main thing is a lot of useful information !!!! Definitely +!
    1. +3
      30 November 2012 16: 14
      Very interesting, but I hope that this knowledge will never come in handy ...
      1. 0
        30 November 2012 19: 03
        Quote: crazyrom
        Very interesting, but I hope that this knowledge will never come in handy ...

        I explain to a foolish person who put me minus: knowledge will not be useful if there is no war with our participation!
    2. +1
      30 November 2012 17: 54
      it’s immediately obvious that a person is a specialist
  2. +1
    30 November 2012 09: 18
    It was interesting to read about Tajikistan and the defeat of T-72 tanks by grenade launchers. But you could write in more detail about the experience of the war in Afghanistan. And it would be interesting to read about the use of RPG-7 in the Caucasus.
    And they did not reveal why the RPG-16 "Udar" was discontinued .......
    But despite the shortcomings, article "+" for revealing some elements of the use of "artillery" by partisans.
  3. Samovar
    0
    30 November 2012 09: 43
    Yeah, the RPG-shka made a name for herself, I think in terms of the combination of combat and operational characteristics - this is the best RPG of the 20th century.
    RPG is effective only in frontal firing from a distance of up to 100 meters, as well as when firing at a range of self-destruction of a cumulative grenade

    I once read that in a battle at an altitude of 3234 in Afghanistan (although it might have been somewhere else), the spirits put self-destructors on shots, and they burst right above our heads, because of which it was impossible to hide from the fire behind a boulder , not in the trench.
    1. -1
      30 November 2012 12: 30
      by the combination of combat and operational characteristics, I think this is the best RPG of the 20 century.

      I am sorry to upset you, but this is not so. The most common - yes, the most effective - not at all.

      The article is definitely PLUS. good
      1. 0
        30 November 2012 14: 04
        Professor
        in fact, Carl Gustav can compete with him and then ...
        You need to correctly say that it is the most effective in its class + you need to understand that there are a lot of types of pomegranates.
      2. +5
        30 November 2012 17: 31
        Professor, in terms of the combination of combat and operational characteristics, I think this is the best RPG of the 20th century .-- Professor, you forgot one more characteristic - the cost !!!!! so that they are right !!! Karl Gustav is much more expensive !!! laughing
        1. 0
          30 November 2012 20: 52
          Professor, you forgot another characteristic, the cost !!!!! so that they are right !!! Karl Gustav is much more expensive !!!

          A couple of years ago I came across an interesting article (unfortunately the bookmarks were gone with the laptop). There, one expert laid out the creation and the RPG-7 itself on the shelves and compared it with competitors. He listed there which research institutes and how many people worked on its creation, almost like an atomic bomb !!! Well and so on. So the question is what to hammer in its value. If only production, then it is cheaper than its Western counterparts, but if the NKR as they do when calculating the cost in the West, then RPG is far de cheaper.
  4. MilaPhone
    +1
    30 November 2012 09: 43
    The article and especially the drawings for it really liked!
    The author is well done! +++
  5. Footmansur86
    +4
    30 November 2012 09: 48
    Itself was a full-time grenade launcher in a platoon, the first grenade launcher was an RPG-7V with a PGO-7 weapon just like a stick, not fastidious to maintain and easy to learn, after a dozen firing it was already trying to get into individual elements and projections of the tank, one thing that confuses at least we didn’t have shots at the warehouse, mainly PG-7VL shots, fired with inert (training) shots only once.
    After I got RPG-7N with PGO-7 and NSPU in the kit, well, there is not much difference except for the presence of a bracket indicating the number of NSPU.
    P.S. RPG-7 weapons are excellent, the main thing is to supply troops with the latest generation of shots
    1. Samovar
      +1
      30 November 2012 09: 51
      Quote: Footmansur86
      the weapon is just like a stick, not fastidious to maintain and easy to learn

      Moreover, this "stick" shoots more than once a year. laughing
    2. +3
      30 November 2012 20: 13
      The main thing is not to forget to yell warnings, so that idiots passing from behind do not burn with a jet stream. Have you shouted something?
      1. Footmansur86
        +1
        30 November 2012 23: 23
        We shot calculations, and at the firing range and there a priori an idiot can’t pass because the firing position is carried out and the head of the training point is present.
        1. 0
          1 December 2012 13: 01
          We, too, by calculations, only in any case they yelled, since idiots are always there, and they drove a habit tightly
  6. Demon_Ex
    0
    30 November 2012 09: 50
    a significant drawback of the domestic RPG-7 is the lack of fragmentation, incendiary-smoke, lighting and other special ammunition

    For RPGs, thermobaric TBG-7V Tanin / 7P33 and fragmentation OG-7V Oskolok / 7P50 ammunition are already being produced.
  7. Penek
    0
    30 November 2012 10: 18
    The ideal weapon in the ratio "cost - effectiveness" or "cost of a shot - cost of the hit object".
    ATGM, of course, is more effective, but its cost is 3 orders of magnitude higher.
    1. Footmansur86
      +1
      30 November 2012 10: 56
      ATGMs and RPG-7s, RPGs are representatives of different classes, ATGMs are primarily SDs, and RPGs-7 are grenade launchers, RPGs are Jet grenades, so it is not appropriate to compare them, and there is a huge gap in the mobility of calculations.
  8. +1
    30 November 2012 10: 44
    Some kind of ancient article. That way 90s
    Shrapnel and tremobaric ammunition are produced.
    Ancient tactics. At least, camouflage methods will not give a special effect against modern NATO tanks, where flashes from launches on thermal imagers will be visible in any case, etc.
    1. Footmansur86
      +6
      30 November 2012 10: 53
      Yes, especially outbreaks will be visible in urban areas and in wooded areas)) RPG-7 is a relatively short range weapon, of course, if you decide to shoot an abrams or merkava from 400 m, good luck)) And in case of a large-scale war, tanks will be used as a means of breaking through the defense, so sit in the trench wait for the tank to approach the allowable distance of the shot and after open fire, stand and look out for the thermal imager is nonsense, in the oncoming battle there are too many obstacles here and the explosions of shells and burning grass and equipment are everywhere warm howling radiation so that the RPG-7 and RPG (antitank rocket grenade) relevance for a long time will not lose.
      P.S. For the correct use of weapons, the commander draws up a "fire card" where the ranges and distances of opening fire by various types of weapons are regulated.
      1. +1
        30 November 2012 11: 43
        well it is more like Yes. Moreover, the Abrams and Leo will be significantly pokotsanny and thinned out by our tanks, Aviation, ATGM.
        By the way on the fire card. Many commanders may not always correctly evaluate ranges on complex terrain.
        1. Footmansur86
          +2
          30 November 2012 12: 40
          The main thing is to correctly determine the guidelines, the rest is a matter of technology)
  9. 8 company
    +2
    30 November 2012 10: 57
    And who is our author? Serge, is it not you, by any chance? Something familiar beard ... winked
  10. 0
    30 November 2012 11: 17
    They knew how to design and produce good weapons in the USSR.
  11. 0
    30 November 2012 11: 38
    Good article.
  12. 0
    30 November 2012 11: 45
    Everything ingenious is simple. The simpler, the more reliable.
    1. 0
      30 November 2012 21: 13
      On this basis, the most reliable stone
  13. dixicon
    +4
    30 November 2012 12: 55
    That's interesting, I read the article and saw
    If the armored object is damaged by a cumulative grenade, the factors affecting the crew are overpressure, armor fragments and a cumulative jet. But taking into account the crew taking measures to prevent the formation of excess pressure inside the machine, such as the opening of hatches and loopholes, shrapnel and a cumulative stream remain factors that affect personnel. On a person, the damaging effect of the cumulative jet inside the armored car is at a distance of up to two and a half meters, and fragments - the entire length of the internal space

    although there was an article saying that it was a myth, and there was no pressure.
    http://topwar.ru/20498-esche-odin-kumulyativnyy-mif.html
    1. 0
      30 November 2012 14: 29
      Unfortunately, I forgot when I read about it, like in the magazine "Young Technician" in the 60s, but the article, the link to which you gave, is about a later ammunition than the one that causes excess pressure in the armor target. The whole difference is in the coverage of the projectile's reverse cone. First, in the Second World War, in particular, a "bare" cone was used, later they began to use a coating in the form of copper. This modernization has increased the burn-through effect. Yes, what am I talking about, in that article that under the link everything is detailed. Therefore, the descriptions of the consequences of the impact of a cumulative projectile differ so much. Unfortunately, I can't say exactly when the "covered" cones appeared, but the grenades that I could use had the coating already, and this time coincides with the war in Afghanistan.
      1. +2
        30 November 2012 18: 52
        All the fighting "kumas" from the very beginning are lined with metal. The cheapest and most ineffective is steel (ferrous metal), the most common is copper, the most effective is depleted uranium, but it is also the most controversial in its application, officially there are none. An unlined charge does not create a "pestle" - the very element of quasi-liquid metal that pierces (does not burn !!) armor. An acute angle of the cone forms a "pestle", an obtuse angle - a "shock core", armor penetration is less, the armor action is stronger, the shock core is formed much further, dist. undermining, mainly - against the horizontal projections of the BTT.
        The effect of overpressure is only for thin armor (bulletproof), for heavy armored personnel carriers closed hatches are a salvation, the shock wave will not flow into the small hole of the hole, but it’s easy to get into the openings of hatches.
  14. +5
    30 November 2012 13: 45
    I was thinking about this ... the grenade launcher, which is no less popular than the Kalashnikov assault rifle, has its own design fathers, but it continues to bear a neutral and meaningless "name". Why?
  15. david210512
    +1
    30 November 2012 17: 30
    RPG-7 is another proof of the simplicity and effectiveness of a light brown weapon !!!
  16. 0
    30 November 2012 17: 33
    Definitely an interesting article. If I may say so, the genre resembles an article about helicopters and helicopter pilots in Afghanistan. as a reader, I would like to express my gratitude to the author. I hope that similar articles will appear about other types of weapons and types of troops, with a description of the practice of using weapons and the real tactics of military operations, and about soldier ingenuity of course.
  17. +3
    30 November 2012 19: 01
    The author of the article is Alexander Sukholesky, a GRU special forces officer in Afghanistan, later in Tajikistan (I don’t remember the number of the Special Purpose Special Purpose Unit). The article itself was published in the magazine Soldier of Fortune back in 1996, number 1 or 2, I was surprised to see here such an old article, which already reprinted more than once.
  18. wolverine7778
    +2
    30 November 2012 19: 18
    RPG-7 is still relevant for another 100 years, especially for armies and rebels in poor countries, practice has shown the effectiveness of RPGs, the same Syrian rebels using RPG-7 already have a lot of tanks and other armored vehicles burned by the Assad army)
  19. Abwehr
    0
    30 November 2012 19: 34
    interesting article
  20. +1
    30 November 2012 22: 52
    The article is excellent, I agree with many who praised it.

    It's a shame only that this miracle weapon was used against our own soldiers. Well, even in the USSR they were already selling this weapon to the side, and about the Caucasus, I am silent about how many of our soldiers were killed from our own weapons ... and someone filled his pocket and was pleased ...

    Well oh well, this is a simple thought in the ear.
  21. 0
    1 December 2012 03: 00
    Hmm, as far as I remember, we developed a compact RPG-7 successor grenade launcher with a set of warheads including thermobaric.
    http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A0%D0%9F%D0%93-32
    An interesting option, but how he showed himself is still unclear.
  22. 0
    1 December 2012 07: 16
    RPG-7 has already proven its high combat effectiveness, in many armed conflicts, at a lower cost (relatively).
    Once I watched the film "The Fall of the Black Hawk Down", and there they also seem to be shuffling at American helicopters from RPG-7s.
    I liked the author’s drawings, clearly, clearly and clearly, in such a militaristic style painted :)
    RPG-16 was discontinued due to the fact that the armor penetration of 300 mm was no longer satisfactory for the military, RPG-7 simply increased the caliber part of the grenade, thereby increasing penetration. At RPG-16 it was impossible to do, since he had a caliber grenade. But the warriors liked RPG-16 because of the high accuracy of shooting, as I understood in Afghanistan, of course they were used not against armored targets, but against fortified dushman points.