The British Ministry of Defense announced the "key role" of Brimstone 2 missiles in deterring the offensive of the Russian army

36
The British Ministry of Defense announced the "key role" of Brimstone 2 missiles in deterring the offensive of the Russian army

Delivered by Great Britain to Ukraine weapon has one, but very important task - it must stop the offensive of the Russian army. Thus, the Ministry of Defense of the United Kingdom commented on the shipment of Brimstone 2 missiles to Kyiv.

Britain sent to Ukraine a new batch of second-generation Brimstone precision-guided missiles, which differ from the first in their range. This became known on November 22, "Military Review" reported on the delivery in one of its news materials.



The British Ministry of Defense decided to comment on military assistance to Ukraine, saying that all the weapons that are sent to Kyiv should deter the advance of the Russian army and are doing it perfectly. In particular, the delivered Brimstone 2 missiles played a certain "key role" in this. True, the British did not give any explanations, forgetting to add on which sector of the front the British high-precision missiles stopped this very offensive.

As part of the aid package, the UK provided the Armed Forces with Brimstone 2 precision-guided missiles. This assistance played a key role in deterring the Russian offensive.

- said in a statement.

As previously reported, Brimstone 2 missiles are aviation means of destruction and are traditionally used from Tornado and Typhoon aircraft, with a range of up to 60 km. In the variant for Ukraine, they are transmitted in the variant of the ground complex with a range of 12 km. Trucks or other ground platforms are used for launching.
36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    28 November 2022 07: 09
    Another sect is being organized? Either the "holy" Javelenna, or the "similar" Hymers. Now the "immaculate" Brimstone? Russia can only be defeated by Russia and this is a fact.
    1. +2
      28 November 2022 08: 12
      So the range is only 12 km in the ground version. This means that their launchers will be in the affected area of ​​​​our artillery. The most common art.
      And what will be the key role then? Another Goebels propaganda.

      PS Here is an air launch - already more seriously. If Svidomites have something left to launch and who to launch ....
      1. +4
        28 November 2022 11: 14
        This means that their launchers will be in the affected area of ​​​​our artillery. The most common art.

        in forelocks, they are mounted on pickup platforms, that is, they are highly mobile. Given the distance, taking into account mobility (time to exit, deploy, launch and leave), as well as our slowness in hitting targets with artillery, I think the probability of destroying launchers can only be purely random.
        And what will be the key role then? Another Goebels propaganda.

        well, at least in the fact that with their help you can easily thwart any attack of our forces. Do not underestimate the rocket. She has enough advantages.
    2. 0
      19 December 2022 20: 17
      so deputy Markov said so - we still cannot defeat Ukraine, because there are also Russian soldiers on the other side. and the Russian soldier is invincible. if you take it literally, some kind of sour perspective looms
  2. +2
    28 November 2022 07: 12
    And it's still Bond on Aston Martin did not drive up! There will be British weapons!
  3. +5
    28 November 2022 07: 15
    Quote: Murmur 55
    Another sect is being organized?

    There are many of these sects... the Saint Abrams sect, the F16 sect, the immaculate Patriot sect, etc.
    All of them should be sent straight to their guru... to Bandera.
    1. +1
      28 November 2022 07: 22
      Lyokha from Android, those whom you listed have another guru and his name is the almighty bucks.
      1. +3
        28 November 2022 07: 33
        Murmur 55, it will be great if the "almighty buck" also goes to meet Bandera. He obviously does not expect such enchanting paper confetti.
    2. 0
      28 November 2022 07: 52
      If they have F16, they will smash their foreheads on the runway
  4. +1
    28 November 2022 07: 17
    Yes, yes .... if grandmother had, like grandfather, then, of course, grandmother was grandfather!
  5. +2
    28 November 2022 07: 19
    the delivered Brimstone 2 missiles played a certain "key role" in this.
    Well, what kind of people, they didn’t have time to stage it, but they are already shouting about some kind of “key role”. The desire to show their significant role in the conflict and, of course, to advertise their products for the future is what lies behind such statements.
    1. +2
      28 November 2022 07: 26
      rotmistr60 hi, that's right, you need to show up in front of the "comrades" in the caudle, like, look at what a barefoot push we did to the Ukrainians))) Well, the second is to "pinch" Russia, they say, we will do what we want, deliver what we want and you won't do anything to us.
  6. +1
    28 November 2022 07: 44
    Mangy dogs somehow need to be reminded of their importance. Shitting under the door, for example.
  7. +1
    28 November 2022 07: 44
    The British Ministry of Defense announced the "key role" of Brimstone 2 missiles in deterring the offensive of the Russian army
    The impudent ones have become insolent to the end, they want to pull over the "key role" ...
    However, if the owner does not mind, so be it ...
  8. +2
    28 November 2022 08: 00
    There was infa on VO about the cost of such a rocket - 200 thousand greens. Use it as a MLRS for 12 km from a shihadmobile?
    1. +1
      28 November 2022 08: 18
      Yes, at least let them hammer nails into it. We then what. Britos just need to be promoted with these missiles. The range of ground use is not impressive.
      1. 0
        28 November 2022 21: 01
        Yes, they cannot launch them on the "ground" without laser illumination.
  9. +1
    28 November 2022 08: 06
    And yet, all the same ... "Brimstone", like the "Javelin", is a modern weapon that demonstrates the concept of further development of anti-tank missile weapons! It has been in NATO for decades, but has anything been done in Russia against it over these decades? Is there really no "reception" against such a "wonder weapon"? Or is the reason more banal, but no less outrageous?
    The main seeker of the "Brimstone" is the active radar seeker of the Ka-band ... an anti-missile type MNTK would serve as a good means of counteraction ... It is desirable that the Russian "MNTK" "work" in 3 modes: 1. active; 2. semi-active; 3. passive ... It is possible to use a combined guidance method; that is, the addition of semi-active laser homing! In this case, "MNTK" can also be used against "javelin-like" missiles ... moreover, the laser guidance beam can also serve as a means of "illuminating" the missile's IR. by placing "antennas" on the surface of the anti-missile warhead ...
    1. +1
      28 November 2022 20: 57
      From what perpug there is fuel and lubricants?
      Laser beam guidance. Learn materiel.
      1. -2
        28 November 2022 21: 25
        Quote: agoran
        From what perpug there is fuel and lubricants?
        Laser beam guidance. Learn the materiel

        What are you talking about? request And also ... "lasernum" ... you don't know Russian well enough?
        1. +1
          28 November 2022 21: 45
          Do you know what LD Fon is?
          Tired of the boobies from TsIPSO.
          1. 0
            29 November 2022 07: 42
            You don’t know the Russian language, but you try to be rude on it with might and main!
  10. 0
    28 November 2022 08: 10
    Containment? Something after the first deliveries of these missiles, the news with her quickly disappeared. Tired of holding back?
    1. 0
      28 November 2022 08: 16
      12 km range. Probably our artoy perekoloshmatili.
  11. 0
    28 November 2022 08: 30
    The British Ministry of Defense announced the "key role" of Brimstone 2 missiles in deterring the offensive of the Russian army

    In the Black Sea basin (or somewhere else), we can fully implement the option of containing the presence of British warships with the help of Russian "Daggers" and "Zircons". Why not?!
    The stick is always double-edged and there is nothing to be afraid of.
    If someone on the banks of the Thames sees the image of Russia as an enemy, then we also have a chance to abstract the concepts of “British partners” into the phrase “British enemies”.
    1. 0
      28 November 2022 10: 04
      Quote: yuriy55
      If someone on the banks of the Thames sees the image of Russia as an enemy, then we also have a chance to abstract the concepts of “British partners” into the phrase “British enemies”.

      Do you understand the hint?

    2. 0
      28 November 2022 20: 59
      Well, tell me how to guide a rocket along a laser beam in foggy conditions.
      1. 0
        29 November 2022 06: 49
        Quote: agoran
        Well, tell me how to guide a rocket along a laser beam in foggy conditions.

        Approximately, as in Vysotsky:
        (nuclear warhead song)
        Here, moving on a beam of light
        Without help, but through,
        I'm flying to this Britain myself,
        To deal with her on the spot.
        feel
  12. +2
    28 November 2022 08: 49
    And I thought it was a sinful thing that Ukraine had aviation.
    1. 0
      28 November 2022 08: 59
      they will let them in from trucks like Gazelle - they wrote on VO about this
  13. 0
    28 November 2022 10: 00
    This assistance played a key role in containing the Russian advance.

    Typical lies! There have been no Russian offensives in the last eight months. And eight months ago, nothing but helmets, walkie-talkies and javelins - the West did not supply the Chewbaccas.
    The deliveries of serious weapons began precisely when the Russian group got stuck and stopped the offensive, moreover, it began to retreat and surrender the occupied cities: that's when the West began these unprecedented arms deliveries, realizing that it was safe.
  14. 0
    28 November 2022 12: 45
    Of course, without these missiles, Ukraine would have been a polar fox. Already there were beyond the Javilins, they survived. We will survive these pieces of iron.
  15. 0
    28 November 2022 21: 00
    Well, you all attacked the British
    the weapon has one, but a very important task - it must stop the advance of the Russian army
    well, they forgot to add to the news - highly likely (“with a high degree of probability”, “very likely”, “most likely”)
    1. 0
      28 November 2022 21: 12
      So the Sumerians are stupid people. On one of the English-language forums, one GI wrote that if I use Javelin, then I need to write an explanatory note. And the Sumerians shoot whoever is in what much.
  16. 0
    28 November 2022 23: 15
    In some material I read that the range is 120 km. So how much is it really?
  17. 0
    29 November 2022 10: 45
    Isn't it time for the IRA to throw something in? something has not been heard about them for a long time ... unfortunately
    well, Apaches with BLM