History of some inventions

18
I think that it was not just me who had such a plan: why does the whole world consider the inventor of radio Guglielmo Marconi or Nikola Tesla, and we are Alexander Popov?

Or why the inventor of the incandescent lamp is Thomas Edison, not Alexander Lodygin, who patented the lamp with the filaments of refractory metals?

But if Lodygin and Popov are remembered in the world, then some people, whose contribution to military affairs, no doubt, was outstanding, are hardly remembered. I would like to tell about such people and inventions.

Dynamite.

The Nobel family lived in St. Petersburg for more than 20 years, the childhood and youth of the Nobel brothers: Robert (1829-1896), Ludwig (1831-1888) and Alfred (1833-1896) passed here, their scientific and business interests were born and formed here. Strictly speaking, Russia became the second homeland for Robert and Ludwig, whose activities are associated with the development of many branches of Russian industry. As for the younger of the Nobel brothers, Emil (1843-1864), he was born at all in the capital of Russia.

History of some inventions
House of the Nobel family in St. Petersburg, Petersburg Embankment, 24. 40-e XIX century


Fate brought the Nobel family, and in particular Alfred, with the founder of Russian organic chemistry, Nikolai Nikolayevich Zinin.

Zinin became the teacher of the Nobel brothers, because in Russia at that time the children of foreigners were not allowed to study with the Russians, and the only way out was to hire home teachers.

And with the teacher, the Nobel brothers were extremely lucky, because it was Zinin who developed the most progressive method for the synthesis of nitroglycerin from glycerol using concentrated nitric acid, low temperature, etc.



He, together with a young engineer-gunner V.F. Petrushevsky solved the problem of using the strongest explosive nitroglycerin for military purposes, a very topical problem at that time. Exploring various nitro-derivatives, Zinin, together with VF Petrushevsky, began work on the creation of an explosive composition based on nitroglycerin, safe during transportation. As a result, a good option was found - the impregnation of magnesium carbonate with nitroglycerin.

Alfred Nobel also joined this work, and it is not surprising that you can be sure that this was agreed with the teacher and father who sent him for an internship to Italian Ascanio Sobrero, the discoverer of nitroglycerin.

And in 1859, the Nobel Father went bankrupt and returned with his wife and younger son Emil in search of a new life to Stockholm, his three older sons remained in St. Petersburg.

And Alfred 1859 / 60 in the winter carries out various experiments with nitroglycerin. He learned how to get it in acceptable quantities for testing. He mixed nitroglycerin with black powder, as Zinin had already done with engineer Petrushevsky in 1854 (in fact, they had created one of the first ways of passification of nitroglycerin), and set fire to the mixture. Experiments on the ice of the frozen Neva proved successful, and satisfied with the results Alfred went to Stockholm.

In 1862 in Helenborg, near Stockholm, the Nobels began to make nitroglycerin handicraft, which ended on September 3 on 1864 with an explosion of monstrous power that killed eight people, among them Alfred's younger brother Emil. Two weeks later, Emmanuel broke paralysis, and until his death in 1872, he was bedridden. The case is now headed by Alfred.

In 1863, he invented the nitric acid-glycerin blender injector (which, by the way, is his greatest invention), which solved the problem. It was possible to start industrial production and the creation of a network of factories in various countries.

As a result of searching for nitroglycerin-based blends that are easy-to-use, Alfred patented a safe combination of nitroglycerin with kieselgur (loose siliceous sedimentary rock from shells of diatoms), calling it dynamite.

Nobel Patent

The same Dynamite


Of course, in this case, the legal aspect of the matter should immediately be formalized. Back in 1863, Mr. A. Nobel patented the use of nitroglycerin in technology, which was not ethical (remember Zinin!). In May, 1867 g. He patented dynamite (or safe Nobel explosive powder) in England, and then in Sweden, Russia, Germany and other countries.

In Russia, 1866 was exploded at the nitroglycerin plant in Peterhof, and further work with nitroglycerin is banned.
Sobrero described nitroglycerin in 1847. Zinin proposed to use it for technical purposes in 1853. Engineer Petrushevsky first began to produce it in large quantities in 1862 (produced over 3 t), and under his leadership nitroglycerin was first used in the development of gold-bearing alluvial deposits in Eastern Siberia in 1867. These are the facts. Among them is the invention of Alfred Nobel dynamite in 1867. Here, it is appropriate to quote the words of such authority as Mendeleev: nitroglycerin "for explosive work was used for the first time by the famous chemist N. N. Zinin during the Crimean War, and then V. F Petrushevsky in 60-ies - earlier invention and widespread use of Nobel dynamite and other nitroglycerin preparations. "

And now few people remember Zinin when he talks about the invention of dynamite. Yes, and the question arises whether Alfred Nobel, who grew up in Russia, was such a Swede?

In August, 1893 Alfred Nobel, as stated in the Highest Command, "interested in physiology and wanting to contribute to research in the field of this science (the influence of urine urine on certain diseases and blood transfusions from one animal to another) donated to the Imperial Institute of Experimental Medicine 10 thousand rubles. “without setting any conditions for the use of the gift brought by him.” The funds went “for the general needs of the institute” - an extension was added to the existing building, where Pavlov's physiological laboratory was located. 1904 Pavlov was awarded the first Nobel Prize in Physiology.

Alfred Nobel


Mortar

17 June 1904 of the year 3-I Japanese army stepped up to the Russian fortress of Port Arthur. The assault began on August 6 and lasted a week. After suffering heavy losses, the enemy went on the defensive. Preparing the next attack, the Japanese were intensive engineering work. Defenders of the fortress also strengthened their positions.

Here on the mine barrier "Yenisei" serves as a junior miner midshipman Sergei Nikolaevich Vlasyev. With a company of naval assault Vlasyev hit the fort number 2. Here, some Russian and Japanese trenches divided the distance in 30 steps. In these conditions required weapon melee, since conventional weapons were powerless. The distance to the enemy was so small that when shooting there was a risk of hitting his troops too. Only occasionally the fortress artillerymen succeeded in flank attacks on enemy positions.

Then lieutenant fleet N.L. Podgursky offered to shoot at the besiegers from torpedo tubes installed in trenches with a certain angle of inclination to the horizon, throwing pyroxylin high-explosive bombs out of them with compressed air. Almost simultaneously, midshipman S.N. Vlasyev advised using the same 47-mm ship’s cannon, mounted on a three-inch field carriage, to give the barrel large elevation angles, and loading it through the barrel with home-made pole mines. Major General R.I., Head of the Land Defense of Port Arthur Kondratenko approved the idea and commissioned the creation of a “mortar mortar” to the head of artillery workshops, Captain Leonid Nikolayevich Gobyato.



Assessing the projects of Vlasyev and Podgursky, Gobyato proposed a number of important improvements.

The creation of a “mine mortar,” as the co-authors called their invention, began during the July battles. "Mine Mortar" was created on the basis of ammunition, called "throwing mine" and was in service with a number of battleships and cruisers of the Port Arthur squadron.

Throwing mine was a cylindrical projectile with tail. It had a caliber of 225 mm, a length of 2,35 m and a weight of 75 kg (including 31 kg of explosives). This mine was fired from a tubular apparatus using a powder charge and hit a target at a distance of up to 200 meters.




The progress of naval combat technology (above all, the improvement of torpedo weapons) made the throwing mine by the beginning of the 20th century archaism. However, the port-arthur experimenters this weapon prompted a valuable idea. After all, they had at their disposal a smooth-bore propelling apparatus, which fired a feathered projectile, having a hinged trajectory and great destructive force. In addition, it was light and, therefore, allowed quick transportation to the place of use. To transform it into (so the experimenters called their creation) required a device that perceives the recoil energy at the moment of the shot, as well as a pointing and aiming device. Their creation was possible for the artillery workshops of Port Arthur.

A limited number of mine vehicles on the squadron and their ammunition, as well as a small firing range contributed to this (6 mine mortars were installed on the land front of the fortress, according to other sources - 7).

It is necessary to dwell on one more version of the “Port-Arthur mortar”, more precisely, on a new type of ammunition for mounted fire - the “above-caliber featurine mine type” proposed by Vlasyev.



The essence of its design and method of use can be defined as follows: the cone-shaped warhead was connected to the bottom with a rod equipped with a stabilizer. This rod was inserted into the barrel of the 47-mm naval gun (from the barrel), and from the breech the gun was loaded with a loaded sleeve (without a shell). Mina total weight 11,5 kg was shot at a distance from 50 to 400 meters.



As you can see, the Russian defenders of Port Arthur created two types of guns, firing firing shells on a hinged trajectory. Subsequently, they were used as bombers and mortars.

The results of their application were on the face. Of every four mines released, three fell into the trenches. Flying high up, the mine turned upside down and fell almost vertically on the target, destroying trenches and destroying the enemy. The explosions were so strong that the enemy soldiers in a panic left their places in the trenches.

By the way, the defenders of the fortress used another new weapon - sea anchor mines in the land version. They were placed on 100 kg of pyroxylin, 25 kg of shrapnel bullets, inserted piece of fuse cord, designed for burning within a few seconds. They were used mainly from positions located on higher ground. Mines dragged up the specially constructed 20-meter plank flooring, set fire to the cord and pushed them against the Japanese. That's just for flat terrain this means of destruction of the infantry.

Having assessed the situation, General Legs decided to stop the attacks on the broad (Eastern) front and concentrate all his forces to capture High Mountain, from which, as he became aware, the entire port-arthur harbor was viewed. After fierce battles lasting ten days 22 November 1904 of the year. High has been taken. The works of Vlasyev with Gabyato fell into the hands of the Japanese, thanks to which his device soon became the property of the British press. Unfortunately, the work of the defenders of Port Arthur by Russian generals was rated as “toy guns”, but it was appreciated in Germany and England.

Flamethrower

The creator of the knapsack fire appliance is Lieutenant-General Sieger-Korn (1893). In 1898, the inventor proposed a new original weapon to the Minister of War. The flamethrower was created according to the same principles as modern flamethrowers operate.

Sieger-Korn Flamethrower


The device was very complex and dangerous to use and was not accepted for service under the pretext of “unreality”, although the inventor demonstrated his offspring in action. The exact description of its construction has not been preserved. Nevertheless, the countdown to create a "flamethrower" can start with 1893 g.

Three years later, the German inventor Richard Fiedler created a flamethrower of a similar design.


Fiedler Flamethrowers


Fidler turned to Russia with a request for testing his developments, such was carried out at the site in Ust-Izhora.

Ust-Izhora flamethrower test (1909)


It was shown 3 type flamethrowers: small (worn 1 soldier on the back), medium (worn 4 fighters), heavy (transportable).

After testing 1909g. The Russian military did not begin to purchase new weapons. In particular, a small flamethrower was considered unsafe for its own, and medium and heavy were considered unsuitable because of the large mass and the need to have a lot of reserves of combustible substances. Charging and installation were considered quite long, which is fraught with risk for combat teams and actual flamethrowers.

After a year and a half, Fidler again turned to Russia, now with advanced weapons, but again did not have success. In other European countries, which he traveled even before Russia, the invention was also not adopted. However, the events of 1915, when the Germans used flame-throwing forces against the countries of the Entente, made the government of the opponents of Germany in the First World War.

At the beginning of 1915, design work began on the creation of flamethrowers in Russia. In September of the same year, military flame-throwers, developed by Professor Gorbov, entered the military tests. But the flamethrower was very cumbersome and heavy, which did not fit into the category of portable weapons. This flamethrower has been rejected.

In 1916, the commission of the military ministry of Russia was presented with a knapsack flamethrower, designed by the designer Tovarnitsky. After successful tests, the Tovarnitsky flamethrower was put into service in the 1916 year, and at the beginning of 1917, the infantry regiments of the Russian army had flamethrowing teams.

Tovarnitskogo Flamethrower


Structurally, the Tarnitzkyi’s backpack flamethrower consisted of three main parts: a cylinder with fire mixture, a cylinder with compressed air and a fire engine with an igniter. The principle of operation of the Tovarnitsky flamethrower consisted of the following: compressed air from a special cylinder got into the cylinder with fire mixture through a special gearbox. Under the influence of pressure of compressed air, the fire mixture was pushed into the hose, where it ignited. The simplicity of the design allowed, until the middle of the year 1917, to release about 10 thousands of Tarnitzky knapsack flame throwers.

Knapsack parachute

September 8, 1910 on the Commandant Field in St. Petersburg held the first aviation competition of Russian pilots. The holiday was already ending when Captain Matsievich’s airplane at an altitude of 400 m suddenly began to collapse. The pilot fell out of the car and fell to the ground with a stone. This terrible event shocked G.E. Kotelnikov, who was present at the same time, that he decided at all costs to come up with an apparatus that would save the life of pilots in such situations.

Pilots escaped to Kotelnikov with the help of long folded “umbrellas” fixed on the plane. The design was very unreliable, besides it greatly increased the weight of the aircraft. Therefore, it is used very rarely.

At home, in the theater, on Kotelnikov street, he was thinking over an aviation parachute. He came to the conclusion that during the flight the parachute should be on the aviator, work flawlessly, be simple in design, compact and light, its dome is best made of silk.

The inventor decided to arrange a parachute on the principle of "the devil in the box." Made a model in the form of a doll with a tin cylinder of a cylindrical shape, which was closed with a lid with a latch. Inside the helmet on a compressed spring lay a dome and lines. It was enough to pull the cord connected to the latch, the cover was folded back, and the spring pushed the dome out. “We lived in a country house in Strelna,” the inventor’s son Anatoly Glebovich recalled about the first tests of a parachute model (he was 1910 years old in 11). - It was a very cold October day. My father climbed onto the roof of a two-story house and threw a doll from there. The parachute worked perfectly. My father joyfully escaped only one word: "Here!" He found what he was looking for! ”

The model was, of course, a toy. When the calculation of a real parachute was made, it turned out that the required amount of silk in the helmet does not fit. And then it was decided to put the parachute in the knapsack. The model was tested in Nizhny Novgorod, the doll was dropped from a kite. Returning to St. Petersburg, Kotelnikov wrote a memorandum to the Minister of War General VAKuhomlinov: “Your Excellency! A long and mournful list of glorious victims of aviation prompted me to invent a very simple useful device to prevent the death of aviators in cases of accidents with airplanes in the air. ”

Kotelnikov asked the Minister for subsidies for making a parachute and conducting tests. He himself took his letter to the war ministry. The minister was absent, and Kotelnikov was received by Comrade Minister General A. A. Polivanov. He read the note, examined the model. The inventor threw a doll to the ceiling, and she gently sank to the floor. The demonstration had a decisive effect on Polivanov. The resolution appeared on the memo: “Main engineering management. Please accept and listen. ”

The meeting, at which the parachute was examined, was remembered by Kotelnikov all his life. The chair was chaired by the Chief of the Aeronautical School, Major General AMKovanko (graduate of the Academy of General Staff!). Gleb Evgenyevich clearly and clearly reported the essence of the matter.

“Everything is fine, but here is a thing ... What will happen to your aviator when the parachute opens?” - asked Kovanko.
- What do you have in mind? - did not understand the question Kotelnikov.
“And the fact that he will no longer need to save himself, since his legs will come off from a strike when the parachute opens.”

Kotelnikov had objections against this brave gentlemen's “iron” argument, but the academic commission suffered: “To encourage the speaker, but to reject the invention because of the obvious illiteracy of the author.”
Kotelnikov recalled: “It was as if a tub of mud was poured over me. Hands down ... ".

Kotelnikov made a second attempt to register his invention already in France, having received the 20 March 1912 of the year patent for the number 438 612.
And in the evening of June 6 1912 a kite balloon rose from the camp of the aeronautical park in the village of Saluzi near Gatchina. A mannequin in full flight form was attached to the side of his basket. Sounded the team "Stop at the winch!".

2000 height m. Three times the signal horn. The mannequin flew down. After a couple of seconds, a snow-white dome opened above it. The success of the tests was obvious. But the military did not hurry. Several more tests were conducted. The famous pilot Mikhail Efimov threw the dummy from his "Farman" - everything turned out. At Gatchina airfield tests conducted by Lieutenant Gorshkov. He dropped the dummy from the Blerio aircraft at a height of about one hundred meters. Parachute worked brilliantly.

But the Main Engineering Directorate of the Russian Army did not take it into production because of fears of the head of the Russian air force, Grand Duke Alexander Mikhailovich, that at the slightest malfunction the aviators would leave the airplane.

Thus, a fundamentally new parachute of the PK-1 type was invented. Kotelnikov's parachute was compact.



Its dome was made of silk, the lines were divided into 2 groups and attached to the shoulder girths of the harness. The dome and lines were laid in a wooden, and later aluminum backpack. At the bottom of the knapsack under the dome springs were located, which threw the dome into the stream, after the jumper pulled out the hood. Subsequently, the rigid satchel was replaced with a soft one, and honeycombs appeared at its bottom for placing a sling in them. This design of the rescue parachute is still used. For what Kotelnikov think, all “non-monks”, pilots and other flyers will be eternally grateful.


In general, some officials of all stripes treated the inventors inhospitable, and the exit for them was “abroad”. The one who could patent there the ideas, also remember that. About the rest they say, "Well, yes, of course ... Russia is the birthplace of elephants." Paradoxically, for example, with all the unusual, ambitious, complex and enormous size, the tsar-tank Lebedenko got his chance to live, because he was interested in Nicholas II.




http://vivovoco.rsl.ru/VV/JOURNAL/VRAN/01_12/NOBEL.HTM
http://warfiles.ru/show-14090-pervyy-v-mire-minomet.html
http://www.100velikih.ru/view1196.html
http://vadimvswar.narod.ru/ALL_OUT/TiVOut0204/Flamm/Flamm035.htm
http://crypto.hut2.ru/ognemet2.php
http://www.topguns.ru/ognemety-2ww/?n=8
http://zateevo.ru/?section=page&action=edit&alias=kotelnikov_ge
http://militera.lib.ru/science/strokov_aa/ill.html
18 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +20
    24 October 2012 08: 37
    There is an anecdote on this topic. "Scientists from countries of the World are going to argue in which country scientists are scientists of others. Italians say: our scientists are the most scientists, because we invented the radio. The Russians answer no, we invented the radio, the Italians were silent. No, our scientists are the most scientists. Americans, we invented e-mail. The Russians answer no, we invented the electric light bulb, the Americans also shut up. The French: our scientists are the most scientists, we invented the blowjob. Everyone fell silent and only the Russians answer: it’s not true, even Ivan the Terrible shouted: “Boyars, I’m in your mouth. - I can see right through ", and this is for you gentlemen Germans about the X-ray.
    1. +1
      24 October 2012 20: 41
      The anecdote is almost true, it is true that our bureaucracy was also touched upon, the Russians always answered first "and you have paper with a seal ..." and the French invented to add X-rays ...

      Sorry, I just love accuracy .... but I reminded you of thanks)))))
      1. bart74
        0
        19 November 2012 01: 52
        Officials - scat!
    2. bart74
      0
      19 November 2012 01: 51
      Bravo, brother!
  2. predator.2
    +3
    24 October 2012 09: 38
    In Port Arthur, ours still managed to shoot torpedoes and lowered ball-shaped sea mines into Japanese trenches.
    1. CARBON
      +3
      24 October 2012 11: 23
      Port Arthur Shmetilovsky machine gun

      From a deficit of normal, they themselves came up with. 5 rifles, a bar for simultaneous reloading. Named by surname, captain Shmetilo. He commanded the defense of the fort and wanted to increase the efficiency of his soldiers, shooter of 1-rifle 5, increasing the density of fire and moral effect. The Japanese loved to go on the attack in tight chains, so the effect of the application was.
  3. sergey05
    +3
    24 October 2012 09: 40
    But still it’s a shame that they don’t value ours so much and we have to all through ... opu to do abroad, but on the protec- tion of all kinds of freaks, in the form of a tsar-tank, they are building it.
  4. Skavron
    +3
    24 October 2012 10: 05
    Well, you can remember Sikorsky ...
    1. +3
      24 October 2012 10: 08
      I wanted to write about him, but he has a completely different story.
      1. +1
        24 October 2012 15: 36
        So write about Sikorsky in a separate article, dear viruskvartirus (especially since you do it well!). After all, he was an extraordinary personality, as well as his affairs ...
        1. DIMS
          +1
          24 October 2012 15: 46
          And his father was a very interesting person
  5. borisst64
    +3
    24 October 2012 11: 37
    And the author calls the landing "nebonyrami"?
    1. +4
      24 October 2012 12: 06
      All paratroopers, because they do not jump, but dive into the sky)

      and some also "float" in the sky with great speed

  6. CARBON
    +4
    24 October 2012 11: 55
    And now about the grenade)
    The Russo-Japanese War of 1904-1905 showed the need for hand grenades as a melee weapon. Neither army had enough grenades. And therefore, their production was established in front-line workshops from auxiliary materials. So the Japanese filled explosive artillery shells and cans with explosives. As a fuse, a detonator capsule with a fire-retardant cord inserted into it was used. Such remote-controlled grenades were unreliable due to the shooting of the fire-resistant cord, in addition, if the cord was long, the grenade could be thrown back.

    An alternative could be grenades exploding when they meet an obstacle.

    In Russia, the first shock grenade was introduced into combat practice by Staff Captain Lishin in 1904. It was first used near Mukden and showed superiority over distant grenades.

    The grenade Lishina had a long wooden handle on which a metal cylinder filled with explosives was fixed with screws. A detonator capsule with an igniter capsule was inserted into the charge. To act on the igniter capsule, a sting was attached to the cap of the grenade on the inside. The cap had grooves, which included the pins of the housing. In official use, the cap was worn separately, and a safety cap was put on the grenade. A zinc belt with external notches was put on top of the case for the formation of additional fragments during the explosion. On the flight path, the handle served as a stabilizer and ensured the correct position of the grenade when meeting with an obstacle.

    The charge consisted of pyroxylin, a former full-time explosive sappers during the war. The simplicity of processing this substance with grenade equipment and the relative availability made weaker than trotyl or melinite, pyroxylin, quite appropriate. Of course, this explosive was not the most effective, it was afraid of dampness, but it was still in the troops. The charge was supplied with an additional detonator.
    The grenade had a technically simple but original device.
    The cap with a sting had slots at right angles to each other. During the swing (movement front-back-up), some centrifugal force developed, as a result of which the cap rotated and the body shifts jumped into the lower slots. From hitting an obstacle, the unsupported cap was pushed onto the body and pricked by the sting of the capsule. It was desirable that the grenade fell strictly "on the head", because it had no side-firing mechanism. Having fallen flat, it became dangerous only for an unwary fighter who decided to examine or disassemble it.

    When falling into snow, mud, water, tall grass, the mechanism did not give a guarantee of operation. The grenade was good in the field, but it was impossible to "roll" it into the dugout like remote grenades - a guaranteed failure.

    The grenade system was original, but not safe. The probability of failure (the throw is not energetic enough and "correct", the pins did not jump into the lower grooves) coexisted with the probability of accidental operation.
    At the same time, the grenade is simple and made in parts during the First World War, because there were many soldiers in the ranks who remembered the events of a decade ago and participated in the war with the Japanese.
    Officially, the grenade was not taken into service, but was still described in instructions to the troops. Either as an option for handicraft production, or as a not quite appropriate excursion into the history of pomegranate business.
    [center] [img] http://weaponland.ru/images/grenade_1/rossiya/lishin-1.jpg [/
    weaponland.ru
    1. +2
      21 December 2013 22: 16
      Quote: CARBON
      During the backswing (front-back-up movement), a certain centrifugal force developed, as a result of which the cap was rotated and the housing shifts jumped to the lower slots.
      In the Soviet RKG-3E, one of the fuses also cocked in this way, only the direction of movement was front-back-down with a sharp forward throw. I remember we were tormented in the camps with these grenades immeasurably, probably with grenades Lishina, too, the correctness of action was not the last thing.
  7. CARBON
    +4
    24 October 2012 12: 13
    Leonid Nikolayevich Gobyato died at the age of 40 under Przemysl in 1915 with the rank of major general, leading the counter-attack of the infantry. Posthumously awarded the rank of lieutenant general.
  8. SIT
    +3
    24 October 2012 12: 50
    Sikorsky invented the helicopter in the USA, Zvorykin invented television in the USA, even the emigrant from Russia designed the first interchanges on the first American freeways in the 30s. Now his son is doing it. 25% of Silicon Valley personnel come from the former USSR. Damn, maybe stop forging frames already? We’ll wave without looking like at the front — they are back to us all of our scientists, and we give them our officials. It is possible in the ratio for one scientist 5 bureaucrats. Maybe we can even feed the remaining statesmen, otherwise we can’t overpower all of us.
    1. Karish
      0
      24 October 2012 12: 55
      Quote: SIT
      Damn, maybe stop forging frames already?

      It is necessary to feed, they will not fly away. laughing
      Quote: SIT
      It is possible in the ratio for one scientist 5 bureaucrats

      Who will pay them there? It is necessary to work there. They are used to living for free, it will not work there.
      Quote: SIT
      Maybe we can even feed the remaining statesmen,

      Scientists feed
      1. bart74
        0
        19 November 2012 01: 54
        Wow! Raise sp to scientists, bureaucrats zp - 0
    2. +5
      24 October 2012 15: 43
      Respected SITIgor Sikorsky did not invent the helicopter, but he made him take to the sky and become a "workhorse" ...
      But the automatic-skew of the rotor blades, without which no helicopter can now be imagined, was invented by the Russian engineer Yuryev. And it happened 100 years ago, in 1912. By the way, over the past century, the skew machine has not undergone any fundamental changes. As the saying goes: "Great inventions live long" ...
      1. +3
        24 October 2012 17: 44
        Well then, he is the father of a heavy bomber and the first passenger aircraft "Ilya Muromets" and this was not done abroad.
    3. bart74
      0
      19 November 2012 01: 54
      Officials from Russia - scat!
  9. +2
    24 October 2012 15: 07
    Good article, read in the book "Port Arthur" about what is described here. Such articles speak best of all slogans about Russians as a nation of creators. And not traders and hucksters.
  10. +2
    24 October 2012 18: 16
    in the mid-90s, the Saratov plant turned to Yeltsin with a request to help expand the production of liquid-crystal televisions - the size of a book. However, no response was received. But the Japanese began to manufacture such products. In general, a lot of applications for invention were lost in the Saratov Pat Bureau and at that time citizens of a number of countries were active in the city ...
  11. bart74
    0
    19 November 2012 01: 55
    Russia is the country of the Kulibins and Lefthanders - it is a fact!
  12. +3
    21 December 2013 22: 22
    It has always been like this: we invent, and someone patents. By the way: D.I. Mendeleev made three openings, for two of which (in a narrower, private form) Nobel Prizes were awarded (that's irony), he himself was not awarded any international or domestic awards. But he died six years after the establishment of the Nobel Prize, but the Russian government and bureaucrats from the academy were objectionable - he didn’t have views, you see. As is typical for Russia.