British military analysts consider the ability of the Russian Airborne Forces to gain control over major airports and seaports in Ukraine

Discussions continue in the British government on what to do if war really breaks out in Ukraine. At the same time, all the discussions in London on this issue resemble a situation in which the authorities of the United Kingdom themselves have frightened themselves by the war so much (or pretend to have frightened them) that they are ready to believe in it, as they say, here and now.

BBC journalists asked Deputy Prime Minister Dominic Raab about the possible sending of British troops to Ukraine in the event of hostilities. According to Raab, it is "unlikely" that British troops will be sent to the territory of Ukraine. At the same time, he once again stated that "Russia will face grave consequences in the event of the outbreak of hostilities." Recall that earlier several dozens of special forces soldiers - rangers arrived in Ukraine from the United Kingdom.

In the meantime, information appeared that the British Royal College of Defense Studies was carefully studying "Russia's actions near the borders of Ukraine and its possibilities regarding taking this country under military control." At the same time, British military analysts propose to consider the situation from the point of view of the ability of the RF Armed Forces to quickly gain control over key transport infrastructure facilities. It is noted that the Russian army, using the airborne troops (VDV), is capable of gaining control over major airports and seaports of Ukraine within a few days, which will make it impossible for the Western "partners" of this country to provide it with timely military-technical assistance.

The potential possibility of Russia to cut off for supplies is being considered weapons ports of Ukraine on the Black Sea, taking into account the fact that "the approach to the ports of Ukraine on the Sea of ​​Azov is de facto under Russian control." In such a situation, the command of the Navy will either have to withdraw its ships first to neutral waters, and then ask permission from the countries of the Black Sea region for the entry of warships into their ports, or put up with another loss of at least part fleet, as it was in the Crimea in 2014. When the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation take control of large airfields and airports, the same thing will happen with the Ukrainian military aviation, according to British military analysts.

The British College of Defense Studies also considers the situation through the prism of the fact that the weapons already delivered to Ukraine, including hundreds of millions of pounds worth of anti-tank systems, may ultimately go to the Russian military or “the armed structures of the Donbass regions supported by them.”

Comments

[nnm]

The constant escalation of the situation comes from the West. Especially from the British side. The situation is reminiscent of the period before the First World War. When all parties were waiting for the slightest spark, which eventually slipped through. The feeling that the countries of the West live in the paradigm of the 19th century, believing that the oceans and straits will save them from the war of the 21st century, as if they were passing the cup of nuclear exchange.
Snickering, self-confident.

[maksbazhin]

They have a constant escalation, and we have in every article that we are not going to attack anyone. And when our media stubbornly tell me something, I stop believing it at all.

[prior]

The successes of Russian diplomacy are no better than the economic "successes".
Only armed conflict can change the situation.
After all, why are we feeding the Russian army?!
Maybe it's time for her to do her own business, to defend the country, to defend its dignity.
Otherwise, the diplomats will once again "get it right" and everything will be even worse, the red lines will turn green, and billions will continue to be plundered and brought to the west.
It seems that in this world words have ceased to be perceived at all.

[nnm]

Excuse me, colleague, I want to clarify - are you yourself subject to conscription for a special period, or do you just want to play with the lives of other guys?

[prior]

You don't want to read the truth and read it bitterly, don't you.
Is our diplomacy making progress in relations with the West?
Name at least one contract.
If they call me at 65, I will go.

[nnm]

And what about your call to "play war" and Russian diplomacy? How does the presence / absence of success in negotiations lead to the fact that "let's send young guys into battle!"?
We will not get tired of sending this every time when it is difficult to negotiate, and sometimes it seems impossible ..

[prior]

Wars, like nothing else, contribute to the change of power and revolutions.

[nnm]

To paraphrase a quote from one person. Aren't you afraid that the next revolution will be fought with stones and sticks for the right to own products in the most remote warehouse in the permafrost?

[Vladimir Mashkov]

Quote: nnm

To paraphrase a quote from one person. Aren't you afraid that the next revolution will be fought with stones and sticks for the right to own products in the most remote warehouse in the permafrost?

funny to listen reinsurer-intimidator! ALL understand what nuclear weapons are and real war! So present, especially nuclear, does NOT want war none: neither USA/NATO nor Russia. But no one wants to retreat and give in! What is the way out? Get ahead of the opponent and send troops to Ukraine earlier! The loser, I am convinced, will not fight with the one who is ahead. And don't be fooled words The USA and NATO that they are not going to enter Ukraine: they have deceived more than once! And the operation must be lightning fast, without losses. As in the Crimea. By the way, British analysts - unlike you - they believe that this task is quite up to the Russian Airborne Forces!

[lopvlad]

Quote: prior

Wars, like nothing else, contribute to the change of power and revolutions.

Change of power and revolutions are facilitated only by lost wars.

[Zik256x]

Does anyone take us seriously?

[Prisoner]

And you do not feed the "Russian army". We will feed our Armed Forces of the Russian Federation ourselves.

[prior]

I'm taxed just like you, so I feed too. That's why I'm asking.

[koramax81]

Watch less Amer's films and remove phrases like "I pay taxes" from them. If you don't know where your taxes go, then shut up

[Sfurei]

Do you pay taxes at 65? Or maybe they are already paying you a pension, so you spend more state. what money do you give? And there is no need to talk about savings in the USSR. In 91, this country was pissed off (including you who are living at that time) along with pension accruals. Yes, and with the money of individuals, not so much is done in this country. To a greater extent, the state budget is made up of legal taxes. persons.

[Victorio]

Quote: Sfurei

Do you pay taxes at 65?

===
we all buy something every day, VAT goes to the budget

[Sfurei]

Then immediately write that when you pay VAT, you still consume state resources every day: for study, for treatment (even when you are not sick), walk and drive on clean roads, bridges and overpasses (which are being repaired and cleaned), get protection from the police and the army , live in a society with established laws, get paid sick leave, social. allowances for children and grandchildren, etc. etc. Continue or stop??
At the same time, tell us how VAT is calculated and how it is deducted to the budget ??

[Victorio]

Quote: Sfurei

Then immediately write that when you pay VAT, you still consume state resources every day: for study, for treatment (even when you are not sick), walk and drive on clean roads, bridges and overpasses (which are being repaired and cleaned), get protection from the police and the army , live in a society with established laws, get paid sick leave, social. allowances for children and grandchildren, etc. etc. Continue or stop??
At the same time, tell us how VAT is calculated and how it is deducted to the budget ??

===
? You asked what taxes in 65 years. for details here https://cardblanco.com/kuda-idet-nds-v-kakoy-byudzhet/

[Sfurei]

You asked what taxes in 65 years.

And I gave you an example that in fact you do not pay taxes (you do not deduct them). Otherwise, anything can be pulled by the ears: for example: I pay excise taxes on fuel, because I bought fish in Moscow, which was caught in the Sea of ​​Okhotsk on a ship, the owner of which bought fuel at a gas station, which bought fuel at a tank farm, which bought it at The refinery that processed it from oil and paid the excise! Those. Do you pay excise? So you can grab anything.

for details here

I don’t need these links, I know how and where taxes are deducted from legal entities, because I myself have a company and I pay these taxes)) Do you encounter them or just read about them?

[Victorio]

Quote: Sfurei

- that in fact you do not pay taxes
- Do you encounter them or just read about them?

===
VAT - indirect, but a tax, like an excise.
we all pay taxes, fill out tax forms, etc., so yes, I also came across.

[Sfurei]

This is the whole point, that for you it is an indirect tax, and for legal entities it is directly applied. Knowing about the rate, the existence of the tax and seeing it on the check in the store is not enough to understand its essence. You need to know: how it is calculated, when, where, etc. And you need to do this constantly in order to understand its entire structure and its impact on business and the market.
Question: the increase in VAT from 18 to 20% - by how much did it increase the burden on taxpayers and how much did it increase the prices of products?

[Victorio]

Quote: Sfurei

This is the whole point, that for you it is an indirect tax, and for legal entities it is directly applied. Knowing about the rate, the existence of the tax and seeing it on the check in the store is not enough to understand its essence. You need to know: how it is calculated, when, where, etc. And you need to do this constantly in order to understand its entire structure and its impact on business and the market.
Question: the increase in VAT from 18 to 20% - by how much did it increase the burden on taxpayers and how much did it increase the prices of products?

===
I don't know if there are pros and cons to the increase. Obviously, this topic is more relevant to you, but I wrote to you that we have paid, are paying and will pay to the state regardless of age.

[Sfurei]

About the taxation system, it can be said for sure that the main tax revenues to the budget do not come from individuals, but from legal entities. And all the stories that they do something with our money are a myth. The main task of FL in the economy is to work, earn money and spend for the circulation of money in the market))

[Flanker692]

Stop, stop, stop, is this serious? I don’t understand, sorry, but is Zelensky “stealing billions” or national battalions? Maybe American Marines? who should our army pay attention to?
it’s time for the prosecutor’s office to get down to business, it’s time for the FSB to get down to business, it’s time for federal journalism to get down to business, and not tell for the hundred thousandth time what is happening in this unfortunate Ukraine. Not to mention everyone else, there are already specific bees that are not going to go against honey.
My opinion is that an open conflict with Ukraine, the introduction of troops into the Donbass, the recognition of the republics will NOT add security to Russian citizens, and certainly will NOT add prosperity to them three times, it will only add another round of tension and chaos in which it will be like a fish in water (unfortunately the only what he can do, but it’s good) for the next 5-10 years our politician, leader and fighter.

[YOUR]

Provided that the same media talk about the transfer of troops to the Republic of Belarus and to the border with Ukraine. So 37 military echelons have already arrived in Belarus. More than 200 are expected. And these are also our media.

[Lionnvrsk]

Quote: maksbazhin

я

Who am I, an ezhin with a bazhin who has eaten poppy seeds?

[Seryoga64]

Quote: nnm

The situation is reminiscent of the period before the First World War. When all parties were waiting for the slightest spark, which eventually slipped through.

And in the role of Gavrila Princip there may be an outskirts

[The black]

"The harsh years are leaving, the struggle for the freedom of the country. Others are coming after them - they will also be difficult". The song is performed by an impromptu revolutionary choir conducted by Shvonder. The imperishable film "Heart of a Dog" was embodied precisely in the historical homeland of the author ... in Kiev.

[Barge_watchman]

A film about Moscow, finally.

[mikh-korsakov]

The further into the forest, the more banter. But the current situation is becoming incomprehensible to me. Unlike Vlad, I do not at all consider our leadership to be mindlessly adventurous, ready to come out with the demand "well, quickly get NATO out." With such a requirement, there are two outcomes - either to present something, after which the command "shove" becomes executive, or to sit in a puddle. Our leadership stressed that NATO must execute the command "shove" urgently and on all menu items without exception. However, our opponent launched into negotiations, our press rejoices, but it’s necessary that he didn’t start up (into negotiations) before, but now he started up, which means we are hoo. But the second month has gone, the enemy is delaying the case? meanwhile, he is talking rabid nonsense about aggressive intentions, and at this time he is quickly arming Ukraine according to the very "I don't want to." So what was our government hoping for? The fact that we will present our Wunderwaffe and the enemy will raise his hands up, but at the same time we are hammering into the enemy's head. that we have peaceful intentions, which means that the Wunderwaffe is not in the game. So what was it? Interesting girls dance. But I see a puddle.

[Sanichsan]

Quote: mikh-korsakov

So what was our government hoping for? The fact that we will present our Wunderwaffe and the enemy will raise his hands up, but at the same time we are hammering into the enemy's head. that we have peaceful intentions, which means that the Wunderwaffe is not in the game.

hmm .. it seems that Western experts are not destined to figure out what is happening in the near future, even if those who are tenacious in Russia are already entangled in this information mess.
There are three equally relevant trends.
1) Russia is not going to attack Ukraine
2) in the event of an attempt to resolve the issue with the Donbass by force, Russia will have a forceful response. (The Ministry of Defense is responsible for this trend. It is not advertised much, but the most serious one. Foreign military attachés have been informed about it, without further ado)
3) if NATO does not remove its infrastructure from the borders of Russia, then retaliatory measures will be taken. (This is apparently being done by the Ministry of Defense and special services. This is definitely not related to the 2nd trend. This is a separate program.)

[mikh-korsakov]

I am not ready to discuss the distribution of directives by departments. 1. In diplomatic terms, the loss of pace is obvious, which made it possible to supply a bunch of weapons to Ukraine. This made it possible for our counterparts to demand an exchange of air for our concessions. Type: West: - We are removing weapons recently delivered to Ukraine, and you withdraw troops from the Ukrainian border. The Russian Federation is not ready to agree to your paragraph 2, see your paragraph 2 - a dead end.
2. It was the deployment of our troops near Ukraine that prevented the attack of the Armed Forces of Ukraine on the Donbass. This is clear even to me, and the military attache should be even more clear. Therefore, a circular motion is formed between paragraphs 1 and 2, and NATO "scat" belongs to later. You can break the circle only by promising the counterpart something unacceptable to them. I don't know what, but obviously not the Wunderwaffe.
according to paragraph 3 We are waiting. My only hope, but I can't think of anything other than canceling the non-targeting status, but that means brandishing a nuclear baton, and that's a risk.

[Sanichsan]

Quote: mikh-korsakov

1. In diplomatic terms, the loss of momentum is obvious, which made it possible to supply a bunch of weapons to Ukraine.

well why the demands have been put forward, the US response is expected and not sometime, but in the coming days.

Quote: mikh-korsakov

This made it possible for our counterparts to demand an exchange of air for our concessions. Type: West: - We are removing weapons recently delivered to Ukraine, and you withdraw troops from the Ukrainian border.

are these your assumptions? So far, no such initiatives have been voiced and it is doubtful that they will be accepted by the Russian side.

[mikh-korsakov]

Tactically, it's not clear to me why our demands were put forward before Catholic Christmas, it creates a convenient excuse, like, you know, we are with all due respect, but we all parted for the holidays. Pulling is good for them. These are my assumptions in the logic of delaying negotiations by our counterparts. Because against the backdrop of hysteria, it is easier to ensure the obedience of Europe, and in Europe everything is different for everyone. For example, Germany does not want to the extent that it can become an obedient tool.

[Sanichsan]

Quote: mikh-korsakov

Tactically, it's not clear to me why our demands were put forward before Catholic Christmas, it creates a convenient excuse, like, you know, we are with all due respect, but we all parted for the holidays. Pulling is good for them.

Perhaps the time is indeed chosen for a reason. if Russia needs its proposals not to be publicly accepted on time, then everything is logical. "Our business is to propose, your business is to refuse," and then in accordance with the previously approved plan, which we are still only guessing about. the mess obviously did not start from scratch, but after analyzing the situation and approving a specific plan of action.

Quote: mikh-korsakov

Because against the backdrop of hysteria, it is easier to ensure the obedience of Europe, and in Europe everything is different for everyone.

this is already reminiscent of the Politburo of the Central Committee of the CPSU ... at the congresses everyone is for Stalin and communism, but in reality Zinoviev and Kamenev with their tricks ... only now they and Germany cannot be sent to the Gulag

Quote: mikh-korsakov

For example, Germany does not want to the extent that it can become an obedient tool.

well, here you can also add France and Italy ... the US campaign has more or less control only on the border of the Russian Federation and the Channel and with Moldova it is now unclear. not just because they turned on the gas ...

[Sanichsan]

poked in the wrong place continue

Quote: mikh-korsakov

The Russian Federation is not ready to agree to your paragraph 2, see your paragraph 2 - a dead end.

point 2 concerns ukraine. point 1 concerns NATO infrastructure in the east. it is unlikely that Ukraine will be considered at all under paragraph 1.

Quote: mikh-korsakov

2. It was the deployment of our troops near Ukraine that prevented the attack of the Armed Forces of Ukraine on the Donbass. This is clear even to me, and the military attache should be even more clear.

between just troops on the borders and what the Ministry of Defense arranged with a conference for the attache, there is simply an abyss. it is one thing for troops with undisclosed goals, and quite another when it is directly announced why they are there.

Quote: mikh-korsakov

Therefore, a circular motion is formed between paragraphs 1 and 2, and NATO "scat" belongs to later. You can break the circle only by promising the counterpart something unacceptable to them. I don't know what, but obviously not the Wunderwaffe.

you see, you are confused again These are two separate topics and do not intersect with each other at all. Ukraine will be beaten when trying to resolve the issue with the Donbass by force, regardless of whether NATO infrastructure is withdrawn or not, and the requirement to withdraw NATO infrastructure also remains regardless of what is happening in Ukraine.

Quote: mikh-korsakov

according to paragraph 3 We are waiting. My only hope, but I can't think of anything other than canceling the non-targeting status, but that means brandishing a nuclear baton, and that's a risk.

Well, there are so many options here. from the admission of some countries to the CSTO with the deployment of military infrastructure there, to the conclusion of a military alliance with China.

[lopvlad]

Quote: mikh-korsakov

In diplomatic terms, the loss of momentum is obvious, which made it possible to supply a bunch of weapons to Ukraine.

what pace can we talk about when, on the other side, behind a large puddle, diplomacy threw back its hooves back in the early 90s as unnecessary, because not only the United States, but everyone in the world was sure that the United States would single-handedly rule the world until the end of time.
Therefore, since the beginning of the 90s, the United States and, in their person, the collective West has replaced its diplomacy with a banal intimidation of everyone and everything. Which, by the way, is doing now, hoping that its frightening dances along with the puppets in NATO will scare Russia so much that it will raise its hands up and rush to them with the offer of negotiations with the signing of the act of surrender.
I see the Americans have already scared you.

[vintorez]

in the event of an attempt to resolve the issue with the Donbass by force, Russia will have a forceful response.
The basis for the forceful response of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, but there is no reason. That is, our country automatically becomes an aggressor with the ensuing consequences. Ukraine will not attack Russia, they are not fools either.

[Sanichsan]

Quote from Vintorez

The basis for the forceful response of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, but there is no reason.

very even there. Russia is one and the guarantors of compliance with the Minsk agreements. in case you forgot Oh, and don't forget to protect your citizens. Do you remember the company with the issuance of passports?

Quote from Vintorez

That is, our country automatically becomes an aggressor with the ensuing consequences.

olo! wake up! read the press! Russia is already an aggressor even before something happened. The United States is not an aggressor, NATO is not an aggressor, despite the fact that several countries have already been burned into dust, and Russia is an aggressor even before it attacked.
what's the point of slowing down? and so and so the aggressor ... well, if you want an aggressor, you will have an aggressor

Quote from Vintorez

Ukraine will not attack Russia, they are not fools either.

Ukraine will kill Russian citizens, you haven’t forgotten that a fair part of the people in the LDNR already have Russian passports? in Ukraine they are aware, so they are quite fools

[vintorez]

What are Russian citizens doing in Ukraine? So they help the "separatists", they have nothing more to do there, this is the answer of the West. And the armed forces of Ukraine will conduct an anti-terrorist operation, and this is quite legal. Or did we not? In 2014, it was necessary to think, if you do not want big casualties of the personnel of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. And the whole West will clap their hands that Russian fools are killing each other, well, gasoline will be poured into the fire in the form of military and other assistance.

[Sanichsan]

Quote from Vintorez

What are Russian citizens doing in Ukraine?

live there and, which is characteristic of Ukraine, I don’t consider myself

Quote from Vintorez

So they help the "separatists", they have nothing more to do there, this is the answer of the West.

help? Yes, it's local. they live there.

Quote from Vintorez

And the armed forces of Ukraine will conduct an anti-terrorist operation, and this is quite legal.

and we will conduct a peace enforcement operation within the framework of compliance with the Minsk agreements, which is also completely legal.

Quote from Vintorez

In 2014, it was necessary to think, if you do not want big casualties of the personnel of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. And the whole West will clap their hands that Russian fools are killing each other, well, gasoline will be poured into the fire in the form of military and other assistance.

so for 8 years now he has been slamming the pan-heads jumping for independence and feeding them with weapons
the booth closes.
judging by the flight of the embassies, ukrov surrender. well, they whine like in 2008. all the same they are up to their ears in the mud and it will not work to teach us the norms of international law
and after the demonstration trample on the ukrovermacht, we will closely deal with the issue of moving the NATO infrastructure away from the borders. By the way, the claims of our Foreign Ministry regarding Romania and Bulgaria indicate that the issue with Ukraine has already been resolved and the border of our interests will pass there. well, if anyone doubts that the American base needs to be removed, then look what happened to the "strongest army in Europe"
the only chance for ukrov to confuse Putin's cards is to withdraw weapons from the demarcation line and begin to implement the Minsk agreements. but they won't do it they are fools

[vintorez]

Nobody gives them up. And PMCs, MTRs, and special forces will help. The territory of the LDNR is Ukraine, but not Russia. I think in the UK we will not protect Russians. Yes, and in the Baltic countries they were not in a hurry, or there are not such Russians. In Chechnya, they didn’t even protect them, there are several thousand left there, who have nowhere to go at all.

[Sanichsan]

Quote from Vintorez

The territory of the LDNR is Ukraine, but not Russia.

well, whose territory will be established when discussing the proposal for the recognition of the republics

Quote from Vintorez

Yes, and in the Baltic countries they were not in a hurry, or there are not such Russians. In Chechnya, they didn’t even protect them, there are several thousand left there, who have nowhere to go at all.

when? in the 90s? Well, then we didn’t protect the Russians in Russia either. but that's in the 90s. times change as in the 90s will not be.

[Sergey Z.]

The most sensible comment.

[nnm]

So.

[Barberry25]

the joke is that the British, on the one hand, are not responsible for anything, the sanctions will hit them very mediocrely, but at the same time, in the event of a war, they will receive buns in the form of strengthening their loved ones, weakening the United States and Germany with Russia

[impostor]

They were told in Russian - BY THE DECISION-MAKING CENTERS. Does Ukraine make any decisions? Seriously?

[mikh-korsakov]

I read the article. Everything is so detailed that the question arose! British figures conducted this study, so to speak, at the call of the heart, or they were still hired by the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, well, as it were, with the goal of remotely working out another option. That is, the hand of Moscow is not only insidious, but also long. Of course, this cannot be compared with the election of our agent Trump as President of the United States, but still, hiring an entire British publication remotely is a class. Stirlitz would envy.

[Lionnvrsk]

British military analysts

British analysts - they are such ANALYTICS! Well, just like the British scientists!

[Uncle lee]

"Don't teach a scientist!"

[Barge_watchman]

The head teacher of the British military college continuously reports to the author of this opus what they are there at recess, discussing in the smoking room ...

[Stepan S]

the situation is also considered through the prism of the fact that the weapons already delivered to Ukraine, including anti-tank systems worth hundreds of millions of pounds, may ultimately go to the Russian military

What pain, what pain, and so they give away for free, but here again they can change the owner for free. Double disadvantage.

[tralflot1832]

The Ukrainians themselves will blow up Boryspil. It would be better if the British military at Heathrow took care of it, Dyutik is very good there. The second question: And how serious are the consequences for Russia - paradise?

[tihonmarine]

Quote: tralflot1832

And how much serious consequences await Russia-paradise?

And the consequences for everyone, and for everyone, will be the same - prohibitive inflation, prices for oil, gas, electricity and all goods will also be prohibitive. The world will fall into chaos.

[tihonmarine]

Recall that earlier several dozens of special forces soldiers - rangers arrived in Ukraine from the United Kingdom.

Recall that 1100 British Rangers left Afghanistan at the outbreak of hostilities by the Taliban.

[rocket757]

And where did they get a demo at least somehow in the world, from those distant times when it was a nation .... a nation, in short, and not a big bunch of all sorts of rabble, which they are now.

[Seryoga64]

Quote: tihonmarine

Recall that 1100 British Rangers left Afghanistan at the outbreak of hostilities by the Taliban.

So there they shot, and then horror stories

[mojohed2012]

Horror stories-horror stories.
But, Six transports from the Northern and Baltic fleets were torn down not for exercises obviously. And landing in Odessa, or somewhere else, is hardly a utopia in principle.
But landing behind enemy lines is 2 outcomes:
1. Or the APU will panic with a cry, the Russians surrounded and begin to scatter.
2. Either the national battalions or other motivated groups will go to liquidate the captured objects and the landing / holding will be bloody + they have already been given stingers, arrows and needles also remained. And transport workers will land equipment and personnel by landing method after the capture of airports by advanced groups. And on takeoff and landing, catching a BTA plane is not difficult. Even from the bushes. You can't cover everything at once.

[Seryoga64]

Quote: mojohed2012

Horror stories-horror stories.

But they don’t shoot like in Afghanistan, but only scare
Are you sure that the small-shaven ones will fight for the forelocks?

[mojohed2012]

If there are airborne landings at several airports, the capture / retention by the airborne forces will be delayed and will be bloody expensive, and in one way or another, the Armed Forces of Ukraine and PMCs of the West will be able to block such landings, crowning the defeat of at least 1 aircraft of the Airborne Forces of the Russian Federation - this will cheer up the linear forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and PMCs and can lead to Western assistance, seeing the incomplete determination of the RF Armed Forces.
Utopia and conjecture. but everything is based on emotions and a changing environment.
Especially who, in the heat of battle, will figure out who is shooting: the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the National Battalion, Svidomo partisans or British mercenaries with Canadians.

[Seryoga64]

Quote: mojohed2012

If there are airborne landings

What are you talking about "if" translate.
I said that they shot at Afghanistan and they fled. They don’t shoot in the outskirts, so they cluster there
And you are already drawing war scenarios for me
Small-shaven people have already declared that they will not fight for the outskirts
And you say "if"
"Following the United States, the United Kingdom began the evacuation of its diplomats"
https://topcor.ru/23706-gosdep-sankcioniroval-jevakuaciju-diplomatov-s-territorii-ukrainy.html?utm_source=politobzor.net

[nnm]

It is not clear why you immediately drop an assault without destroying command centers, air defense and gaining air supremacy. In sum, this gives a loss of control and all these national battalions and so on turn into just a crowd. But this is no longer resistance, although, of course, there will be individual losses.
But the question is different - why are we entering into a discussion of the situation imposed by the British?
I can't imagine the option in which we start hostilities. Only if Ukraine arranges a large-scale military provocation. But this is a completely different story. This, as already mentioned, will lead to the loss of statehood for Ukraine, and then, for sure, all forces and means will participate, and also, it will not be correct to consider the landing separately.

[SKVichyakow]

The British want to be believed in Ukraine, they associate themselves only as instigators, and we have nothing to do with it.

[avia12005]

No, the shaves are definitely very stupid. 659 Russian NKVD special forces brigade has already rented all the apartments near Heathrow Airport. And I am ready to take it at any moment along with Downing Street, 10. By the way, who knows: Downing is from the word Down ???

[Flooding]

Quote: avia12005

659 Russian NKVD special forces brigade has already rented all the apartments near Heathrow Airport

Has the bolt cutter spoken?

[avia12005]

Yes, exactly.

[tralflot1832]

If only he didn’t sleep when he delivers vodka with potatoes and herring to tenants! Something has not been seen for a long time, on an English theme! Busy with business?

[avia12005]

He's probably already at Heathrow. Leads the NKVD special forces.

[rocket757]

The British College of Defense Studies also looks at the situation through the prism of

. Through the prism of this and that ... they sit on their island and say quietly, what else can they advise.

[cniza]

Pret them, lately, they are tormented by phantom pains from their former greatness ...

[rocket757]

They need to distract the people from internal troubles ... they did not invent anything new.

[Pavel57]

In addition to airports, nuclear power plants and hydroelectric power plants should be taken under control.

[tralflot1832]

And JK Rowling to the kingdom.

[Mouse]

mail and telegraph!!!

[tralflot1832]

Boriska cut under Nikita!!!

[faiver]

and give me a shoe...

[Evil543]

Well, we're not going to make a revolution so little mischief

[Mouse]

I'm not used to half measures... naughty so naughty...

[tralflot1832]

Naughty so naughty, I'm recruiting a team for a friendly match with Manchester United, I'm on the tank at the gate!

[Barge_watchman]

And wine cellars. As in 17th...

[Zoomlion]

"In a British college" - that is, in a banal technical school / hobz

[rotmistr60]

weapons supplied to Ukraine, including hundreds of millions of pounds worth of anti-tank systems, may end up in the possession of Russian military personnel or "the armed structures of the Donbass regions supported by them."

Even this situation is being worked out, but they continue to supply weapons to Ukraine, because they really want to start a war. And again, Russia is to blame for not attending the war between the Slavs planned by the Anglo-Saxons.

[Retvizan 8]

... "several dozen special forces soldiers - rangers arrived from the United Kingdom to Ukraine" ...
I hope they immediately arrived in women's dresses, so as not to change clothes later, when they have to run away again.

[APASUS]

Russia will be disconnected from SWIFT. Russia, taking advantage of the military situation, will turn off gas and oil. It only seems that the West will be able to bring the Russians to their knees, the price of energy will be such that no military successes will save the West's economy

[spirit]

Comrades Xi will win in all this, which will be for us what we are for Belarusians. A trade hub, and everyone will be driven through their new silk road (for a commission, of course).

[APASUS]

Quote: spirit

Comrades Xi will win in all this, which will be for us what we are for Belarusians. A trade hub, and everyone will be driven through their new silk road (for a commission, of course).

It will be worse if Comrade Xi surrenders us and negotiates with the West

[Roma 1977]

Then he will be eaten next.

[venik]

"....The British College of Defense Studies also considers the situation through the prism of the fact that the weapons already delivered to Ukraine, including anti-tank systems worth hundreds of millions of pounds, may ultimately go to the Russian military or “the armed structures of the Donbass regions supported by them”. ..... "
======
Do they still have doubts?

[Amateur]

This is most reminiscent of a dog breeder who incites his trained dog: "Face, face."

[aszzz888]

British military analysts consider the ability of the Russian Airborne Forces to gain control over major airports and seaports in Ukraine

Smallish think and "consider")). The Airborne Forces are "capable of gaining control over" states !!! There would be an order.

[Vissarion Golubov]

It's funny to you, but I'm worried about the English special forces that were sent to Ukraine. Suddenly, the dress code:
skirts. So it’s possible to freeze the economy, winter is still in the yard ...

[Dizel200]

West took the goal to push unnecessary cargo? And why should we?

[Barge_watchman]

And what, the Abrams are being transported by sea to the port of Mariupol?
And all the weapons that come in a stream are imported exclusively by "scows full of feces"? (C)
Expanding the topic, I propose to block the Bosphorus - to walk like that.
airports ..... I see it, Ily with landing troops, circling over Kiev, but Boryspil does not give a landing, - "wait, they say, we have Kolomoisky's charter on the way" ... or, worse, closed due to weather ... .
Yes, and the Stingers are not in vain delivered, you look and they will meet you with a doublet on the landing glide path ... like that Il over Lugansk ...
And parachutes, so finally.

[Barge_watchman]

Quote: tralflot1832

The second question: And how much serious consequences await Russia-paradise?

With furry aggels...

[cniza]

Recall that earlier several dozens of special forces soldiers - rangers arrived in Ukraine from the United Kingdom.

Do they have rangers?

[sen]

There is. The regiment was formed on December 1, 2021.

According to the Minister of Defense of the Kingdom, Ben Wallace, the authorities plan to form a new regiment of special operations in the near future, whose fighters will bear the name of the Rangers. This structure will consist of four battalions, and the regiment itself will become part of the Special Operations Brigade. For these purposes, the British Ministry of Defense is ready to allocate more than 160 million dollars, and it is expected to deploy soldiers and officers by the end of the year.

https://www.kp.ru/daily/27254/4385930/

[Serge_SB]

Or maybe send collectors to Kiev? How much they owe us, how much Xi. Well, I've been taking the rest for how many years .....

[Jose]

And what will be the legal status of these British special forces if hostilities begin? Mercenaries? Then they can not be taken prisoner, mercenaries are outlaws.

[BABAY22]

That tse w Garna Falcups from a neighboring farm, and then sho half nigra, so tanned.

[sen]

British military analysts consider the ability of the Russian Airborne Forces to gain control over major airports and seaports in Ukraine

See how they try. So for our General Staff they will do all the work.

[Kedrovich]

It is not the first time for the British to support various Nazis.

[75 Sergey]

But Ukraine does not have a land border, it is washed by the Belorusian Sea