Preparing for a large-scale conflict between the United States and China in the framework of AUKUS. Tyndall Air Base in focus

61

Undoubtedly, the optoelectronic monitoring of the fortification work of the PLA engineering units on the islands of the disputed Spratly archipelago, as well as radio-technical reconnaissance of the anti-aircraft detection and targeting radar - missile systems of the Air Defense Forces of the PRC (with direct identification of the types of air defense systems and the frequency modes of operation of their guidance radars) clearly illustrated the implementation of two key tasks formulated deep on the sidelines of the US defense department.

First of all, we are talking about a demonstrative multiple expansion of the presence aviation US Navy and Air Force in neutral airspace above the green "9-dotted" line, filigree framing the vast exclusive economic zone of the Celestial Empire in the South China Sea.



The primary goal of this step is the traditional Pentagon flexing its muscles to demonstrate its readiness to put pressure on Beijing in a territorial dispute with Vietnam, Taiwan and the Philippines over the ownership of the Spratly archipelago and the Paracel Islands.

In light of the gaining stable regularity of transit (with periodic deployment) through the water area of ​​the South China Sea of ​​aircraft carrier strike groups of the Royal Navy of Great Britain and the US Navy, as well as the very successful testing by hydroacoustic operators of multipurpose nuclear submarines of Astute and Virginia classes of detection and tracking of Chinese MAPs of pr. 039B / G Shang, which do not differ in the highest level of acoustic secrecy in comparison with domestic and Western counterparts, the deliberately provocative demonstration by the US Navy command of readiness for force dives in the disputed areas of the exclusive economic zone of the PRC comes to the fore.

The most important details of the construction of the US Air Force strike fist at the Australian air base Tyndall


In the foreseeable future, the level of operational-strategic tension of such dives may well exceed the apogee points observed by us during the recent penetration of the British destroyer D36 HMS Defender into the territorial sea of ​​Russia near the Republic of Crimea, as well as the attempt by surface ships of the Ukrainian Navy to carry out penetration into the water area of ​​the Sea of ​​Azov through the Kerch Strait.

Secondly, the subject of detailed optical-electronic, radio-technical and electronic reconnaissance of PLA forces and means on the disputed islands (including radars for detecting and targeting anti-aircraft missiles, launchers of coastal SCRC, as well as multi-band complexes for the exchange of tactical information and relaying over secure radio communication channels ) is the early and accurate identification of the former, as well as the analysis of the amplitude-frequency parameters of the latter.

Subsequently, the data obtained by the above methods will provide the US Navy command with comprehensive information on the types of anti-ship missiles used by the PLA Naval Forces in this region (be it YJ-12 Eagle Strike or YJ-18), and will also allow simulating the required algorithms of electronic countermeasures with appropriate response amplitude frequency characteristics.

Later, these algorithms will be loaded into the on-board computers of the latest container electronic warfare systems of the AN / ALQ-249 NGJ-LB / MB / HB Increment 1/2/3 line, to be placed on the harnesses of the EA-18G Growler electronic warfare aircraft of the US Navy and the Royal Australian Air Force.

The most remarkable moment against the background of the above-mentioned pre-escalation preparations is the haste formation by Washington, London and Canberra of a new military-political alliance AUKUS, the zone of operational and strategic control of which will be the Indo-Asia-Pacific Region (IATR).

According to competent sources in the defense departments of the three allied states, as part of the formation of the structure of the new bloc on the territory of the Australian continent, an impressive military infrastructure of the United Armed Forces AUKUS will be deployed as part of several large air bases, naval bases (including berthing facilities and unified logistics points and maintenance of MPSS of classes Astute, Virginia, Sea Wolf, Los Angeles, Ohio and Vanguard, destroyers URO of classes Daring, Arleigh Burke and Hobart, cruisers of the Ticonderoga class, etc.), communication and relay centers in operational-tactical and operational strategic links, as well as air defense-missile defense position areas covering these objects.

Meanwhile, the American, British and Australian media are still very superficially covering the details of the formation of the forward AUKUS military grouping on the Australian continent, completely missing out of the focus of attention such a strategically important object as Tyndall Air Base, located in the Northern Territory of Australia.

Back in the first quarter of 2016, the information and military-analytical publication theaviationist.com, referring to the statement of the US Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Damien Picart, published information about the upcoming deployment of the aircraft wing (7th or 28th) of strategic bombers-missile carriers B- 1B Lancer from the 8th Army of the US Air Force Global Strike Command, as well as the construction of the corresponding infrastructure for servicing these machines on this AVB.

Given the fact that, according to the same Picart, the wing of strategic air tankers KC-10A Extender will also be redeployed to this airbase, the crews of several B-1B units at the same time will be able to shift combat duty in neutral airspace near the launch lines of stealthy tactical cruise missiles. long-range AGM-158B JASSM-ER, as well as their anti-ship version AGM-158C LRASM (up to 24 ALCMs of this type can be placed on the internal suspension nodes of each Lancer) on strategically important coastal objects of the PLA and naval strike groups of the Chinese Navy, as in the South China and East China seas.

At the same time, the geographical position of the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) Tyndall airbase itself (in the depths of the Australian continent, at a distance of about 240-270 km from the Timor and Arafur Seas) will ensure the formation of a powerful echeloned anti-missile shield above it, represented by at least 3 Patriot PAC air defense systems. 3MSE and the THAAD anti-missile system, erected in the alleged missile-hazardous northwestern, northern and northeastern air directions.

It is from these directions that a massive strike by supersonic and hypersonic aerospace attack weapons of the Air Force and / or the Chinese Navy can be delivered.

Airbases located near the coast can be covered (by several missile defense belts from the sea / ocean missile-hazardous direction) only by Aegis - carriers of SM-3 anti-missile missiles, as well as ultra-long-range missile defense systems RIM-174 Block II ERAM.

Unlike the super-maneuverable endoatmospheric SAM-interceptors MIM-104PAC-3MSE of the Patriot PAC-3MSE complexes, equipped with gas-dynamic belts of transverse control engines, the RIM-174ERAM missiles have extremely low available overloads of 30-35 G, which do not provide reliable interception of the advanced Chinese maneuvering high-precision weapons; while the RIM-161B / C (SM-3) interceptor missiles are capable of working only against exoatmospheric objects and do not ensure the destruction of supersonic and hypersonic targets in the stratosphere and mesosphere.

As you can see, the operational and strategic advantages of such a location of Avb Tindal are more than obvious.
61 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    26 September 2021 05: 13
    The Chinese need to create the same threats to the United States, look for allies and create military bases and hotbeds of tension around and within the United States.
    The pain points of the USA are known and it is necessary to skillfully press on them in order to moderate the warlike ardor of the Pentagon and the White House ... the best defense is an attack, the monkey will not be allowed to sit on a tree branch ... they will cut down a tree and let it go on a barbecue.
    1. -5
      26 September 2021 05: 49
      How many ports in Australia are there in China? And what, after all, you think that only we can stuff the CD into a sea container? And run from an Australian port? That is, already Chinese.
      PPS: something in impudent suites with fantasy is poor. In Australia - Tyndal airbase, in Florida - Tyndal airbase again ... She became famous for the fact that they made submarines from F-22 there)))
      1. +4
        26 September 2021 08: 34
        By developing infrastructure and energy in other countries, China thereby has a colossal influence on these states, because not only construction, but also maintenance, and in some places the management of these facilities is also carried out by the Chinese. And what is transport and energy for any state - these are its legs, take them away ... and everything will fall.
        Panama and the Dominican Republic have severed diplomatic relations with Taiwan. Costa Rica, Panama, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Peru in Chinese investments and head over heels in debt. It will not be an insoluble problem for the PRC to create a PMTO for its navies in the ports of these states. And where the PMTO, there may appear launchers of anti-aircraft missile systems, mobile and stationary anti-ship missile systems and MRBMs ... But to implement all this, a powerful ocean-going fleet is needed, the active construction of which is now being carried out by the PRC ...
        1. Eug
          +2
          26 September 2021 11: 09
          China needs to create this, mattresses have already created this .. in NO, there is a scheme - two lines of containment of the PRC fleet. I think this containment will be very effective, China has only one advantage - the proximity of its own shores. And, as I understand it, no one will openly support China ...
          1. +1
            27 September 2021 00: 28
            Do you think we will sit on the sidelines? If China is crushed, we are next in line. Likewise, if we are crushed, China will be next.

            Nobody will, of course, steal, but all the technologies we have, we will accidentally allow China to "steal", and we will conclude a bunch of contracts for the supply of resources so that the factories do not starve.

            Late, the United States decided to wake up. And they pressed us for too long. So far, China says that it is not considering a military alliance with us, which means that we are not against it. And against the alliance of two of the three existing superpowers, although we are in 2nd and 3rd place in strength, the United States will not cope.

            Well, it is impossible to crush him economically, we have enough resources for both of us, and China has enough industry for our needs. A military scenario ... is impossible. Korea was not touched what to say about nuclear heavyweights, given that China is building up its nuclear potential.

            Default ... we are buying gold to peg currencies, preparing, so to speak, for independence from the dollar, contracts with China are increasingly in national currencies.

            We are slowly forming the second pole of power, which has enormous potential.
            1. +2
              27 September 2021 20: 30
              I don’t really believe the Chinese, they are too obviously open their mouths in Primorye and Altai. But there are no complaints about America, Britain and Australia, on the contrary, it is a very serious business.
              Much will depend on who they invite next to this union - if Japan, definitely China is a screen and everything is directed at Russia.
            2. +2
              30 September 2021 09: 02
              In my opinion, China is moving too quickly to the status of a superpower. Wouldn't stumble. You need to be more careful. Be careful. As for us, you have to be "above the fight". All our attempts to "help brothers and co-religionists" ended very badly for us. And we assume that the "brothers" have their own state and their governments, which are obliged to solve their problems themselves. For the rest, we observe, standing on the sidelines and take actions that, in the long term, will affect favorably for us.
              A prime example: the United States before World War II. The army is so-so. The Navy is not so hot. However, the United States got rich on military supplies, military orders and, moreover, climbed into the list of "victorious countries". Although, for the entire time of the war, being an ally of the USSR, they conducted a couple of military operations. Investments and losses are a minimum. Profitability and maximum status. Exceptionally common sense and wise political management. And no "brothers" for you. Well done, in a word. We would like to learn from them, common sense and concern for our people and our economy.
        2. 0
          29 September 2021 17: 37
          Nonsense, without military force and the willingness to use it, it's all nonsense.
    2. +8
      26 September 2021 06: 45
      create military bases and hotbeds of tension around and within the United States.
      In Canada and Mexico .... laughing
      1. +4
        26 September 2021 06: 47
        Mexico is the best option ... there is so much hellish entertainment for Satan fans. Mama don’t cry.
        1. +4
          26 September 2021 08: 13
          Quote: Lech from Android.
          Mexico is the best option

          Cuba will do too!
          1. +9
            26 September 2021 09: 50
            Cuba will do too!


            Half of the planet is ours, half is yours. Going?
        2. 0
          26 September 2021 11: 01
          winked What's wrong with French-speaking Canada? The United States has offended its historical homeland. In fact, they mixed with dirt and took away the wallet. laughing
        3. +2
          27 September 2021 04: 54
          Quote: Lech from Android.
          Mexico is the best option ... there is so much hellish entertainment for Satan fans. Mama don’t cry.

          A bar from Dusk Till Dawn? ))
    3. +4
      26 September 2021 11: 49
      Quote: Lech from Android.
      cut down wood and put on a barbecue.

      Well, Lesh, you somehow inaccurately put it ... Certainly - nobody will eat SHASHLIK from the TREE.
      In my opinion, it would be more accurate: - "They will cut the tree, and MONKEY will be allowed to have a barbecue! "But this is a simple slip of the tongue, an incorrect construction of the phrase. But what E. Damantsev considers NAPL 039 for MAPL (multipurpose nuclear submarine) - this is an unforgivable mistake for such a technically savvy author.
      For reference:
      Diesel-electric submarine type 039 (NATO code name: Song class) developed by the Wuhan Institute for Ship Development and Design (Institute 701) for the PLA Navy. The construction was initially undertaken by the Wuhan Shipbuilding Industry Company and later by the Shanghai Jiangnan Shipyard Group. One base variant of Type 039 and at least six improved variants of Type 039G have been delivered to the PLA Navy since 1994, with more hulls currently under construction in Wuhan and Jiangnan. The construction was carried out in three series with constant improvement of the boat's performance characteristics. On the last three submarines, it was supposed to install AIP - an air-independent installation for underwater movement. (No data)
      Source: Chinese Aspects of Singapore's IMDEX Naval Technology Show.
    4. +3
      26 September 2021 18: 01
      Quote: Lech from Android.
      The Chinese need to create the same threats to the United States, look for allies and create military bases and hotbeds of tension around and within the United States.
      The pain points of the USA are known and it is necessary to skillfully press on them in order to moderate the warlike ardor of the Pentagon and the White House ... the best defense is an attack, the monkey will not be allowed to sit on a tree branch ... they will cut down a tree and let it go on a barbecue.


      Funny.
      China would guarantee control in the Malacca Corridor for the passage of its fleet. And about channels like Suez, how can China provide something for itself?

      China can, of course, dominate the South China Sea, that is undeniable.
      Aukus is just being created to create a threat to China at the exit from the South China Sea.

      You yourself think about whether China will be able to surround the United States with its navy and the east and west coasts. Ensure the availability of sufficient forces, including the constant presence of strike and reconnaissance aircraft.
  2. +7
    26 September 2021 06: 59
    all this once again shows that Matrasnya is the only bastard on the planet because of which a tryndet can start, only they threaten everyone and are constantly looking for enemies
    1. +7
      26 September 2021 08: 15
      Quote: 501Legion
      Mattress is the only bastard on the planet because of which a tryndets can start, only they threaten everyone and are constantly looking for enemies

      Oh, not the only one! These at least threaten out loud, but such as "Great Britain" do dirty tricks in silence. And no one knows which is better.
      1. -1
        26 September 2021 11: 52
        In general, very few people take Britain seriously, if they did not have a concentration of huge world capital in London, even more so. In military terms, apart from mattresses and NATO, they are unlikely to pose a threat to the Russian Federation and China.
        1. +2
          26 September 2021 18: 26
          Quote: 501Legion
          In general, very few people take Britain seriously, if they did not have a concentration of huge world capital in London, even more so. In military terms, apart from mattresses and NATO, they are unlikely to pose a threat to the Russian Federation and China.


          They try their best to avoid situations when it is required to fly under their flag. Most often they act with someone else's hands. And thus they arranged all kinds of trouble from small and very dirty ones with long consequences to large-scale ones.

          By the way, their fleet is quite strong and balanced. Including with a strategic component.

          Maybe you're talking about the fact that they abandoned tanks, well, yes, they are preparing for a confrontation at sea, they need a fleet and aviation. Tanks are not needed in any way, a waste of money.
  3. +11
    26 September 2021 07: 25
    Now at Damantsev's China and the United States are about to start fighting? How many storytellers like this Damantsevs are around the country, useless, not working, not giving the country any benefit, only engaged in writing inventions ...
    1. +4
      27 September 2021 05: 05
      Quote: TatarinSSSR
      Now at Damantsev's China and the United States are about to start fighting? How many storytellers like this Damantsevs are around the country, useless, not working, not giving the country any benefit, only engaged in writing inventions ...

      You did not understand the main message of the article:
      tactical-strategic dominance of the above-described location AvB Tyndal - 69 ZA-E. BAL, equipped with a stabilization belt Hermes Birkin KRKDL Gena, MILAN-161B / C (EURO from 20000) anti-missiles are capable of operating only in exoatmospheric, not even in Mars orbit, subjects and do not ensure the defeat of supersonic and hypersonic Papelans Made in China in the stratosphere, mesosphere and sadomasa Sfeoe, which is only capable of a 2-DILDO BDSM missile equipped with a radar - STRAPON detection.
      1. +2
        27 September 2021 20: 03
        Quote: Krasnodar
        You did not understand the main message of the article:

        good
        briefly and everything is clear
      2. +1
        27 September 2021 20: 28
        Yes, this is the meaning of the article
  4. +1
    26 September 2021 08: 05
    territorial dispute with Vietnam, Taiwan and the Philippines over the ownership of the Spratly archipelago and the Paracel Islands.


    Does China have at least one neighbor to which it has no territorial claims?
    1. +3
      26 September 2021 11: 30
      Quote: Kitty Moore
      Does China have at least one neighbor to which it has no territorial claims?

      WIKI writes that
      Border relations between Russia and China have been completely settled after the transfer of territories with a total area of ​​2005 km² to China in 337.

      Reason: "Demarcation of the Russian-Chinese border (2005)".
      1. +1
        26 September 2021 12: 39
        More Pakistan
  5. AML
    +3
    26 September 2021 08: 15
    Quote: Kitty Moore
    territorial dispute with Vietnam, Taiwan and the Philippines over the ownership of the Spratly archipelago and the Paracel Islands.


    Does China have at least one neighbor to which it has no territorial claims?

    Are there any countries to which no one has territorial claims?
    1. +3
      26 September 2021 08: 39
      Pvpua New Guinea ... it seems that there are no complaints from its neighbors. what
      1. +4
        26 September 2021 09: 26
        Indonesian hawks against ...
    2. -1
      26 September 2021 17: 24
      Are there any countries to which no one has territorial claims?


      To all the surrounding neighbors? I don't know, it seems to me that China is the only one.
    3. +1
      27 September 2021 21: 49
      Quote: AML

      Are there any countries to which no one has territorial claims?

      Luxembourg.
      Finland also has no claims since 1944
      I also thought Switzerland ... but no, they argue with Austria on the question: how to nibble Bodensee
  6. -3
    26 September 2021 08: 50
    What about the transfer of 50-80 Chinese divisions to create a European front against NATO ?! And then crossing the English Channel from the Pacific Ocean is somehow inconvenient ...
    1. 0
      26 September 2021 10: 26
      80 Chinese divisions will not be enough ... they have there 100 million young Chinese in kung fu training ... potential soldiers of the PLA.
    2. +1
      26 September 2021 17: 26
      Quote: viktor_47
      What about the transfer of 50-80 Chinese divisions to create a European front against NATO ?!

      You do not read periodicals, the PLA has long since switched to a brigade structure, there are less than a dozen divisions left ... and almost all of them are centrally subordinated ...
    3. 0
      29 September 2021 17: 35
      Some kind of drunken nonsense)
  7. +2
    26 September 2021 09: 26
    AUKUS, now also India, is the "anaconda" for China. How would the United States not overstrain itself on two fronts.
  8. 0
    26 September 2021 12: 32
    Let the Chinese fight the Americans. Or vice versa. We don't mind. We are even FOR!
    1. +2
      26 September 2021 12: 41
      Here nafig we do not need their conflict "as an adult"
      1. +2
        26 September 2021 13: 36
        Why not needed? This is the ideal situation when our two main rivals on this earthly ball begin to gnaw each other. And we, pretending to be weak, weak and not posing a threat, stand on the sidelines and wait.
        1. +1
          26 September 2021 19: 03
          Quote: CU-5
          This is an ideal situation when our two main rivals on this earthly ball begin to gnaw each other.

          perfect ??
          170 years ago, England fought the Opium War against China. It didn't really bother us then.
          And now it will hurt. Specifically, it will hurt.
  9. +1
    26 September 2021 14: 46
    I'll guess the author from the first lines! But I agree with him in this article.
  10. -1
    26 September 2021 14: 58
    By any means: diplomatic, military, bribery, blackmail, etc. it is necessary to push China and the United States to war with each other. This is the only chance for the Russian Federation to survive and remain independent.
    1. 0
      31 October 2021 23: 31
      Of course you have to, but why do someone else's work? Why would Russia do the work of England? Today, you need not to fuss for someone, but to look up on the tiptoe. What will happen if the coalition wins? Everything is clear here. We are following this is not discussed. But what if China wins? Can you define further development? I'll tell you nat. And you? Well, are you shouting, waving your hands?
  11. The comment was deleted.
  12. 0
    26 September 2021 20: 00
    Bases, broadcasts, satisfaction. The impression is that the author himself did not type a letter in this text. Stupidly copied from sources such as promotional items. Takes up a lot of space. This nonsense is not able to read any more.
    1. +1
      26 September 2021 20: 15
      This is Damantsev, baby!
      laughing
  13. 0
    26 September 2021 21: 47
    Calm down, there will be no direct military conflict!))
    1. 0
      29 September 2021 17: 33
      Are you ready to bet your family's life on it?
  14. 0
    27 September 2021 01: 10
    Quote: Egoza
    Quote: 501Legion
    Mattress is the only bastard on the planet because of which a tryndets can start, only they threaten everyone and are constantly looking for enemies

    Oh, not the only one! These at least threaten out loud, but such as "Great Britain" do dirty tricks in silence. And no one knows which is better.

    Well, these bastards can
    and "relocate" under water laughing In the 60s, 7 hydrogen bombs were needed for resettlement, now 5 pieces of Sarmatians or 4 Poseidons are enough wassat
  15. 0
    27 September 2021 13: 30
    China has a fairly large number of Su30 ... and China continues to produce them, and began to make J20, AWACS aircraft are mass-produced by China ...
  16. 0
    27 September 2021 14: 47
    The only task is to throw Australia at the mercy of the Celestial Empire? Should we stay aside ourselves as always? England is the key link in this trio. It interferes with both Russia and China. But from the beginning Japan.
    1. 0
      28 September 2021 10: 43
      Australia's task is auxiliary actions - blockade of sea routes, maintenance of the fleet of the same Britain in the region, etc. China is highly dependent on sea routes and creates a powerful fleet in the region ... Australia is conveniently located and follows US policy in a stable manner. I would not be surprised that the United States will provide some kind of subsidy for these nuclear submarines.
      1. 0
        3 October 2021 13: 31
        And then why not get the SMP?
        1. 0
          9 October 2021 07: 27
          Well, geography is not going anywhere. And the economy has changed. Previously, Europe and the United States were the largest industrial powers ..... And not so dependent on trade routes. Now their importance has grown, China has grown, and the topic of "the opium war 3 * is again relevant
  17. 0
    28 September 2021 17: 33
    In order to create a real threat, China needs to have a foothold, as in Europe, therefore the only thing that the United States, England and others like them have is aviation, the navy, and of course nuclear weapons. Therefore, we will see nothing but shaking the air and inflating budgets. But who has the contact of the borders? Right! India, Vietnam and Russia, but India disappears because of the mountains, Vietnam because of a small area, but with China it is catastrophically large. This suggests itself in the future, at first, the maximum escalation of the situation between the Anglo-Saxons and China, and then they can swing Chinese requests for the territory of Siberia, because in China they do not hide it, they just prefer to bypass an uncomfortable topic in our country. There is a doctrine in China (out of many) that if you cannot do it today, then do it gradually. Those encourage the population of the territory of another state with their compatriots, teach the children in school about the Chinese territories temporarily seized from weak China, and so on. Think comrades!)
    1. 0
      29 September 2021 17: 35
      Why do you rightly think that the states will start an invasion?
    2. 0
      3 October 2021 13: 34
      And the fact that we, too, can suddenly take the side of the murderers of China there, of course, they don’t think about it, shitting down the well?
    3. 0
      9 October 2021 07: 29
      You can simply control trade routes and the delivery of raw materials to the PRC and goods from the PRC .... And, accordingly, the prices of Chinese products.
  18. 0
    29 September 2021 18: 05
    Quote: Ryusey
    Why do you rightly think that the states will start an invasion?

    Of course I don’t think so) That's why we need to strengthen the land borders! And the United States and England, apart from nuclear weapons, do not have the physical ability to resolve the conflict without nuclear weapons with China and Russia. But in the case of China and Russia, then with a massed and at the same time over a large extent of China's border on us, there will be a dilemma of using nuclear weapons on its territory. What do you think, what will be the solution?) Here is the catch ..... My opinion: the enemy is more important for us with whom we have territorial disputes, those China, Japan, Finland, Poland, Turkey, Ukraine, Baltic limitrophes, Norway, Kazakhstan. They are not with us with the USA and England.
    1. 0
      3 October 2021 13: 36
      It's time not to count the hayaki, but to act on a large scale and not wait like this smart-ass yellow monkey.
  19. 0
    9 October 2021 13: 49
    Quote: Oleg Timofeev_5
    And the fact that we, too, can suddenly take the side of the murderers of China there, of course, they don’t think about it, shitting down the well?

    It's like playing with chairs to music, only here are countries that move around certain interests pushing out the weak and sluggish. And our world is now very mosaic. The problem with China is that it is practically mono-national and there is a lot of it. The rest of the world is multinational and, in fear of their small size, countries can rally against China. If not, then China will simply become bigger) Plus the culture of Islam, the ethnics of rising Africa, the Western self-eating culture, I would like to hope that there will be a place for us, or we will simply degenerate.