Russia will continue to supply Su-30SM fighters to the Air Forces of Belarus and Kazakhstan

26

The air forces of Belarus and Kazakhstan will receive new multipurpose fighters Su-30SM, Russia intends to continue deliveries of aircraft. This was stated by Dmitry Shugaev, Director of the Federal Service for Military-Technical Cooperation (FSMTC).

As part of the MAKS-2021 aerospace show, Shugaev, answering a question about the probable supply of the Su-30SM multipurpose fighter for export, explained that this aircraft is the basis of the fighter fleet. aviation Belarus and Kazakhstan and Russia will continue to supply these fighters to neighboring countries.



Further deliveries of Su-30SM aircraft to Belarus and Kazakhstan are planned

- leads TASS words of the head of FSMTC.

Recall that at the end of 2020, the Kazakh Air Force was armed with 24 Su-30SM multipurpose fighters, while the Ministry of Defense of Kazakhstan plans to purchase 36 super-maneuverable fighters. The Belarusian Air Force is currently in service with four Su-30SM, received at the end of 2019. The second batch of four fighters is expected in October 2022. In total, the Ministry of Defense of Belarus plans to purchase 12 Su-30SM.

Su-30SM (serial, modernized) is a two-seat super-maneuverable 4 ++ generation fighter. The combat radius of the aircraft is 1500 km, the duration of the flight without refueling is 3,5 hours. Serially supplied to the troops since 2013. The aircraft is armed with an extensive arsenal of high-precision weapons and bombs.
26 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -13
    23 July 2021 09: 06
    "Russia will continue to supply Su-30SM fighters to the Belarusian Air Force"

    Belarus will continue to supply potatoes and dairy products to Russian counters.
    1. +6
      23 July 2021 09: 13
      This is not a bad option.
      1. -6
        23 July 2021 09: 14
        Yes. But the news is quite insipid.
        1. +4
          23 July 2021 09: 23
          For Belarusians, in my opinion, the MiG35S would be much more suitable. But he is not. And in general, it is easier to take pilots for allowance and put them in Russian Su30SM
          1. 0
            23 July 2021 09: 25
            "everyone chooses for himself - a woman, a religion, a road ...."
            1. +5
              23 July 2021 09: 29
              If he can choose: He has money, he is allowed on the road, he can afford it and a woman is in his brain .........
          2. +12
            23 July 2021 09: 38
            At least you can trust the Belarusians, unlike the leadership of Kazakhstan. I am familiar with the refugees that they fled from Kazakhstan in almost the same pants. And if they left the south of that country, they would not leave at all.
            1. +8
              23 July 2021 09: 46
              I agree, but my sincere conviction is that helping the CIS countries need to pedantically take something away in favor of the Russian Federation ....... and not tolerate "multi-vector". Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan, due to the availability of resources, do not ask for money from the Russian Federation, but they also have effective levers. In Belarus, the situation is different. And the example of Ukraine has shown that an empty injection of money does not work. And honest buying of assets too.
    2. +8
      23 July 2021 09: 16
      Quote: prior
      Belarus will continue to supply potatoes and dairy products to Russian counters.

      You say so, as if it were something bad.
      1. -7
        23 July 2021 09: 21
        I say this because this is news for granted, like the supply of Belarus tractors at the request from Uryupinsk. When Kazakhstan became interested in Turkish armored personnel carriers - yes, there was news.
        1. +1
          23 July 2021 09: 35
          Kazakhstan has quite well solved the problem with the armored personnel carrier ..... mastered the South African 4x4 and 8x8 vehicles .... In the Russian Federation, there are no serial analogues, except for the BTR82. And they are worse. It is a pity that the topic was not developed, except for Kazakhstan they are nowhere to be seen and the South Africa itself with its blacks in power are wasting their best practices. They had good attack helicopters and different artillery and armored vehicles. Kazakhstan can quite buy technology from blacks.
    3. 0
      23 July 2021 09: 33
      Belarus will continue to supply potatoes and dairy products to Russian counters.
      Flood after flood, 80% of the potato rotted, so everything is useful from Belarus.
    4. +7
      23 July 2021 10: 09
      .
      Belarus will continue to supply potatoes and dairy products to Russian counters.

      Tractors, sighting systems and military electronics can no longer be supplied? As well as mining trucks, gas stoves, refrigerators, washing machines, what else have I forgotten?)
  2. RMT
    +2
    23 July 2021 09: 12
    This means that the order for the Su-30SM by Kazakhstan and Belarus has not decreased. Delivered 28 out of 48. What were the prerequisites for changing the order? And who can remind you of how Kazakhstan and Belarus pay for these planes?
    1. +1
      23 July 2021 12: 27
      Quote: RMT
      And who can remind you of how Kazakhstan and Belarus pay for these planes?

      Kazakhstan pays regularly, but I have no information on Belarus.
      These deliveries have more of a military-political aspect than a business. Therefore, our allies receive equipment and appropriate support at domestic Russian prices. And it is right.
      1. RMT
        +1
        23 July 2021 13: 56
        thanks for the answer. I thought so myself
  3. +10
    23 July 2021 09: 33
    Belarus, and Kazakhstan ... need to be armed and stuffed with our weapons, and preferably with our military units ... with combat experience (fortunately, we have them).
    these countries are the "red" lines for Russia.
    1. +1
      23 July 2021 14: 33
      Quote: Atlant-1164
      Belarus, and Kazakhstan ... need to be armed and stuffed with our weapons, and preferably with our military units ... with combat experience (fortunately, we have them).

      Old Man only agrees to be armed. And for nothing.
      He regularly protests against additional base placement.
  4. 0
    23 July 2021 09: 39
    Okay, Kazakhstan, but for Belarus "fuck a button accordion", a small country, MIG is quite (unless, of course, to fight with Germany).
    Su's lobbies are ready to push him to everyone, it was funny when India announced a tender for a light fighter, and Rosoboronexport, within its framework, began to push Su. One gets the impression that the MIG and Yakovlev design bureaus were simply merged. Most likely, if both of these design bureaus had at least 50% of the financing of Sukhoi, we would have had a more balanced air force (with the further development of Yak141, MiG31 and MiG29 / 35 / 1.44 MFI).
    1. +7
      23 July 2021 16: 15
      Do you think that the Belarusians themselves, alone will fight with someone? In my opinion, only in conjunction with the RF Armed Forces, and accordingly, the General Staff of the RF Armed Forces considered it necessary to have the Su-30SM in this direction.
      1. 0
        23 July 2021 17: 20
        Good time of the day. Of course, they themselves will not fight alone, but this is an advanced outpost, rather they will not even have time to take full advantage of them ... I mean, the MIG has a short take-off (when attacking airfields, the chances are higher), a quick climb and more part of the advantages in this situation, in the world as a whole, MIG classmates form the basis of fighter aircraft
  5. -3
    23 July 2021 11: 04
    Su30SM?
    And why would they?
    Well, okay Belarusians, they seem to be putting on their modern avionics, if I'm not confused.
    But the Kazakhs need this old stuff, if the new version is already ready Su30cm2
    1. -2
      23 July 2021 13: 41
      It is expensive to upgrade to SU30cm2 by ourselves, but they sold it and let them upgrade themselves ...
  6. 0
    23 July 2021 21: 34
    In Kazakhstan, 1 su30 crashed, an additional fighter will be purchased. So far, it seems silent.
  7. 0
    23 July 2021 22: 06
    Quote: Zaurbek
    I agree, but my sincere conviction is that helping the CIS countries need to pedantically take something away in favor of the Russian Federation ....... and not tolerate "multi-vector". Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan, due to the availability of resources, do not ask for money from the Russian Federation, but they also have effective levers. In Belarus, the situation is different. And the example of Ukraine has shown that an empty injection of money does not work. And honest buying of assets too.
    Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan are different situations, Kazakhstan is a member of the CSTO.
    Azerbaijan is not a member of the CSTO, and even more so, apparently, everything is heading towards its direct war with Armenia, a member of the CSTO, though already on its internationally recognized territory, as I understand it.

    We also supplied the Armenians with the Su-30, but they really needed to supply the MiG-35 - and it is cheaper for us that the Armenians will return the loan, and even now, IMHO, naive hopes, but we would have loaded the plant, plus provided employment and continuity. It is worth doing the same with other members of the CSTO - supply them with the MiG-35. Plus, in the CIS, Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan, that is, three countries are not members of the CSTO and three countries of the CSTO, for a start it would already be a good help for the MiG ...
  8. -1
    24 July 2021 04: 35
    Enough to feed at the expense of Russians, Lukashenka and Kazakhs! There is one Russophobia, the Russian language and the textbooks of their history - a good example!