Military Review

American observer: US Navy will sink Chinese aircraft carriers in case of conflict in the open ocean

77

The task of American propaganda is to create an image of China as a weaker adversary, which the United States has no cost to defeat. Of particular interest to the American press is the naval potential of the Celestial Empire, since if the United States and China enter into open confrontation, this will happen, first of all, in the Pacific Ocean.


American military expert James Holmes, head of the department of naval strategy at the Wiley Naval College, in the popular magazine The National Interest emphasizes that in recent years Beijing has been actively promoting Chinese anti-ship missiles as "destroyers of aircraft carriers." Apparently, the Chinese side is hinting to the Americans that they should not try to threaten the PRC in the waters of the Pacific Ocean, especially in the Taiwan region and near the disputed islands in the South China Sea.

Indeed, according to the agreements, the United States is not developing medium-range ballistic missiles comparable to the DF-21D or DF-26. But if you imagine a naval war between the Celestial Empire and Uncle Sam in a different scenario, then the PRC will have very little chances. After all, the confrontation between the surface and submarine fleets will lead to the victory of the US Navy.

China currently has two aircraft carriers. The first - "Liaoning" - went into operation in 2012, but it was built back in 1985 in the USSR, and later was part of the Ukrainian Navy as "Varyag". The second aircraft carrier is Shandong. This is a much more modern ship, laid down in 2013, launched in 2017 and entered into the PLA Navy in 2019.

According to experts, the modern Chinese aircraft carrier Shandong can carry 30-40 aircraft and helicopters on board. American aircraft carriers are on average capable of carrying about 85-90 aircraft. Thus, in aviation The US Navy is almost 2,5 times superior to the PLA Navy. This is a very large air superiority. Moreover, modern American fighters are technically advanced, Chinese aircraft are still inferior to them, according to James Holmes.

It is also worth noting that the United States is constantly improving its anti-ship weapons. One of the main tasks on which the specialists of the American military industry are constantly working is to constantly increase the range of anti-ship missiles, which makes it possible to keep enemy ships at a long distance, not allowing them to approach American aircraft carrier groups.

According to Holmes, if necessary, the United States will be able to deploy a large number of different types of weapons, which can be described as "destroyers of aircraft carriers": these will be anti-ship missiles, and naval aviation, and submarines.

Another thing, the analyst stresses, is that the United States and China are unlikely to engage in naval battles in the open ocean. After all, they have nothing to share in the central part of the Pacific Ocean. Where there is an intersection of Chinese and American interests, slightly different rules apply: both Taiwan and the disputed islands are not so far from the coastline, and the PLA Navy, if necessary, will be able to use the potential of its coastal forces, which is much stronger than the potential of aircraft carriers. ...

Holmes notes that the Chinese Navy is a "fortress fleet" - their strength is in the coastal guns and in the fact that they will feel great close to the coastline. But on the high seas, Chinese aircraft carriers are doomed to failure: the US Navy will simply let them sink, according to an American observer. Therefore, the only way out for China is to impose its own model of warfare on the Americans, that is, not to send their ships far from the coast. In this case, the powers are equalized, and it remains to be seen who will emerge victorious from such a confrontation. Such a factor as the presence of China, like the United States, a nuclear weapons, the American author does not consider. And this is the primary aspect of any potential military conflict between two states.
Author:
77 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Doccor18
    Doccor18 April 30 2021 12: 32
    +12
    Therefore, the only way out for China is to impose its own model of warfare on the Americans ...

    This is not the only way out, but the basis of the strategy, and for everyone ...
    1. Uncle lee
      Uncle lee April 30 2021 12: 45
      +4
      powers equalize
      Therefore a collision is unlikely ...
      1. Ross xnumx
        Ross xnumx April 30 2021 13: 07
        +4
        Another thing, the analyst stresses, is that the United States and China are unlikely to engage in naval battles in the open ocean. After all, they have nothing to share in the central part of the Pacific Ocean.

        Something reminds me:
        "We would have given them more if they caught up with us ..."
        So do not dazzle the Mule. Americans are by nature lazy cowards. In terms of combat effectiveness, they can even be opposed to the Israeli army.
        Everyone remembers the "brave raid" of the American AUG towards the DPRK. So what? When "Fat Eun" threatened them with something serious, they freaked out and pretended to just go out for a walk. Even with a powerful grouping in NATO, the Americans are looking for "simpletons" who will go to war with Russia.
        In Southeast Asia, even India will not stand up against the PRC! Well, if only the "mighty fleet" of the United States ... In the open ocean ... Near native shores ... wassat It remains to find out when the Chinese AUG will move there.
        Striped pontorez. Accustomed to take on fright. If China has real combat experience (the experience of waging a big war), then the Americans will leave Southeast Asia forever.
        IMHO ...
        1. Observer.
          Observer. 27 May 2021 19: 49
          -1
          But when there was no Internet, only the family knew that you were.
      2. Overlock
        Overlock April 30 2021 14: 22
        +4
        Quote: Uncle Lee
        Therefore, a collision is unlikely ...

        It will not be agreed. Share the market and everyone will be happy.
        1. Uncle lee
          Uncle lee April 30 2021 14: 37
          +2
          Quote: Overlock
          agree.

          Very easily .... And they will "be friends" until the interests intersect.
      3. xorek
        xorek April 30 2021 15: 43
        -2
        Quote: Uncle Lee
        powers equalize
        Therefore a collision is unlikely ...

        The United States is of course right, but you shouldn't belittle the Chinese too much .. China already probably already has supersonic "aircraft carrier killer missiles" .. US AUGs are still afraid to approach China and even North Korea ..))))
    2. Andrei Nikolaevich
      Andrei Nikolaevich April 30 2021 13: 03
      +7
      I am afraid that one hundred USA finally and for a long time ceased to be the main leader in world politics. And the withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan repeats the withdrawal of Soviet troops and the subsequent decline of the striped empire. Balobol Biden6 is a copy of our Gorbachev's windbag.
    3. XXXIII
      XXXIII April 30 2021 13: 03
      +2
      Quote: Doccor18
      Therefore, the only way out for China is to impose its own model of warfare on the Americans ...

      This is not the only way out, but the basis of the strategy, and for everyone ...

      This is true, but the United States overestimates its capabilities. Their tactics are to strike ahead of time, moreover, weaker the opponent or the weakened one. But if "kamikatze with yao" fly to them in the morning, all their power will have the same effectiveness as on the first day of the attack on Perharble. Therefore, they are not interested in the number of ships in China, but in their ability to inflict invisible crushing prowess. That's what to be afraid of, that's why they monitor the ocean, the air. And the Pentagon is probably waiting for China to start making a kind of "Poseidon" ?! laughing
      1. Grandfather
        Grandfather April 30 2021 18: 00
        -1
        American observer: US Navy will sink Chinese aircraft carriers in case of conflict in the open ocean
        and the Navy of Vanuatu, your Omerega will be split into molecules with quantum weapons!
  2. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 April 30 2021 12: 41
    +15
    US Navy will sink Chinese aircraft carriers in case of conflict in the open ocean
    You are wrong Holmes. In the event of a conflict, both sides will suffer losses. But the Chinese are mentally prepared for losses, but the Americans are not.
    1. vvvjak
      vvvjak April 30 2021 12: 51
      -1
      Quote: rotmistr60
      In the event of a conflict, both sides will suffer losses.

      In the event of a conflict, the army of the PLA of the PRC will be larger than the total population of the United States and the Russian Federation. It will be very problematic to stop them without the help of nuclear weapons.
    2. XXXIII
      XXXIII April 30 2021 13: 09
      +1
      Quote: rotmistr60
      Only the Chinese are mentally prepared for losses, but the Americans are not.

      And the confederates of the United States, too, will be the first to hide behind international law or will simply begin to blah blah blah. lol But Russia will not allow the preponderance of forces to be not in favor of the Chinese comrade, not in our interests, for sure. yes
      1. Boa kaa
        Boa kaa April 30 2021 20: 04
        +3
        Quote: XXXIII
        But Russia will not allow the preponderance of forces to be not in favor of the Chinese comrade, not in our interests, for sure.

        I believe the Russian leadership has enough wisdom not to get involved in other people's showdowns, limiting itself to the moral and military-technical support of Comrade Xi.
        1. XXXIII
          XXXIII 1 May 2021 07: 21
          +1
          Quote: BoA KAA
          Quote: XXXIII
          But Russia will not allow the preponderance of forces to be not in favor of the Chinese comrade, not in our interests, for sure.

          I believe the Russian leadership has enough wisdom not to get involved in other people's showdowns, limiting itself to the moral and military-technical support of Comrade Xi.

          Well, it's like a Chinese saying, we will sit on the shore and wait for the corpse of a passing enemy. laughing We have already learned it, we know! If the conflict is open, then the Russian Federation will have to keep its troops on alert.
    3. Pandiurin
      Pandiurin April 30 2021 14: 15
      +1
      Quote: rotmistr60
      US Navy will sink Chinese aircraft carriers in case of conflict in the open ocean
      You are wrong Holmes. In the event of a conflict, both sides will suffer losses. But the Chinese are mentally prepared for losses, but the Americans are not.


      Now "democrats" are in power in the USA.
      If the turmoil with China does not turn into an all-out war with the massive use of nuclear weapons.
      And he will stop at several naval local skirmishes, followed by confrontation.
      Then the United States will face the task of mobilizing the country and the transition to martial law in all spheres of activity.

      It is quite possible that this will entail a change of government in the United States to a republican one.

      The current elite in the United States is definitely not ready for this.
      1. Thunderbolt
        Thunderbolt April 30 2021 22: 43
        +1
        Quote: Pandiurin
        The current elite in the United States is definitely not ready for this.

        the previous, current and subsequent elite are preparing their insidious plan for world stability, namely, to lure China to Africa, and then USAFRICOM plans to arrange a series of crushing bad booms for the Chinese like Syria, only in Africa it is a total genocide, millions will go under the knife.
        The Eurasian theater of operations. Here Afghanistan is clearly outlined from where the Americans are "leaving." A holy place is never empty, and the Chinese will climb in there with an eye on Middle Asia and communication with Iran and the Blvd. East as a whole. Naturally, this will not like growing India very much and will very much play into the hands of the United States, which will easily organize a war of "ichtamnets" against occupation claims of the PRC. Against this background, the PLA does not forget to strengthen the operational and strategic formations on the borders of the CSTO and the Russian Federation itself. But this alarming configuration is so ambitious and multifaceted that it deserves a series of whole articles, and not just one comment. But on the whole, the strategic situation on the Russian-Chinese border is quite possible. I can describe it with a Chinese proverb --- Sweet and sweet in the mouth, and a serrated sickle on the heart.
  3. rocket757
    rocket757 April 30 2021 12: 41
    +4
    American observer: US Navy will sink Chinese aircraft carriers in case of conflict in the open ocean
    They will play by someone else's rules, there will be problems ... but who will go for it ???
  4. Lech from Android.
    Lech from Android. April 30 2021 12: 42
    +5
    In words, the Americans tore up the Russian economy, what can we say about the Chinese.
    Likes the United States to wishful thinking.
    1. Tusv
      Tusv April 30 2021 12: 51
      0
      They forgot that they were isolated. I remember how 4 additional aviation regiments were transferred to the Far East during the Korean crisis. The Japanese howled that our anti-submarine aircraft were interfering with sleep, and Two AUGs went one to Australia, the other for repairs. It was Our Russia, which is not worth a penny. Only China is afraid.
      Yeah. If we are so safe and fluffy, all questions to the Middle Kingdom
      1. aleksejkabanets
        aleksejkabanets April 30 2021 12: 56
        +4
        Quote: Tusv
        during the Korean crisis.

        Quote: Tusv
        It was Our Russia

        During the Korean crisis, there was the USSR. He has nothing to do with this Russia, or is he distracting you from the word USSR?
        1. Tusv
          Tusv April 30 2021 18: 23
          +2
          During the last Korean crisis, there was Shoigu already, and he is already related to Russia. And also the chairman of the Geographical Society. Do you think that the Yankees will surely flee away Stalin is needed?
          1. aleksejkabanets
            aleksejkabanets April 30 2021 18: 59
            -1
            Quote: Tusv
            During the last Korean crisis

            And when was the "last Korean crisis"? How did he express himself and what did the Russian Federation do to resolve it?
            1. sleeve
              sleeve 1 May 2021 04: 36
              +1
              Wow ... Not in the know mean? "Election Analytics?" The crisis concerned the advancement of aug to the shores of Korea with the aim of "denuclearization". Well, how would it have been declared. You can say "Trump's exit in white." It ended with a call and "organic conversation". In terms of operational aug went in their own belt, as already written. We have completed the task of concentrating forces and resources on TVD. With a corresponding result. Our interest is to prevent escalation and strike on our territory, which is very possible from geography. In principle, there is an air defense umbrella and not a frail fist formed at the videoconferencing. A nuclear submarine in full force in the sea. Enough to understand the situation. Well, as with the recent teachings.
              1. aleksejkabanets
                aleksejkabanets 1 May 2021 07: 33
                -1
                Quote: sleeve
                We have completed the task of concentrating forces and resources on TVD.

                Have you personally performed? And what kind of forces and means have you concentrated on this "theater of military operations"? And what kind of military operations were fought there?
                Quote: sleeve
                The crisis concerned the advance of aug to the shores of Korea with the aim of "denuclearization".

                You have a poor idea of ​​what a crisis is. Such "crises" happen once a year. Just recently, was the "Iranian crisis" in your opinion?
                1. sleeve
                  sleeve 1 May 2021 11: 35
                  +1
                  Oh, sorry, I didn’t expect to meet just a high-class professional so suddenly. Not prepared. Based on the construction of your phrase, next time I will accurately indicate the names and surnames of the participants in the transfer of forces and means. Itself the "outside observer" to sign, because apart from taxes and feasible voluntary assistance I have nothing to do with the defense potential. About naming "crisis" a crisis. If you don't mind, I will continue, since the events described quite correspond to the meaning of the word, even though they are at different levels of political and strategic interaction and tension. And since after the "crisis" the starting disposition changed, then the crisis itself was present. Please read the corresponding "primers". But in general, there is nothing more to answer actually ... As I understand it, you yourself know everything and know how to do everything)))
    2. aleksejkabanets
      aleksejkabanets April 30 2021 12: 52
      +4
      Quote: Lech from Android.
      In words, the Americans tore apart the Russian economy

      Even without their help, it (the economy) "broke", there are enough "own" figures like Nabiulina, Gref and Siluanov.
      1. Lech from Android.
        Lech from Android. April 30 2021 13: 11
        -5
        Reveal to us how Gref, Naibulina and Siluanov broke the Russian economy ... it is very interesting to read your reading matter. smile
        1. aleksejkabanets
          aleksejkabanets April 30 2021 13: 13
          -3
          Quote: Lech from Android.
          Open it to us as Gref, Naibulinai and Siluanov tore apart the Russian Economy ...

          I do not really understand the question, please formulate it more clearly.
          1. Lech from Android.
            Lech from Android. April 30 2021 13: 18
            -3
            Oh well... smile
            Since you mentioned the three above-mentioned characters, tell us how, without the participation of the Americans, they are tearing up the Russian economy ... in detail where, when, under what circumstances ... this is very important for initiating a criminal case.
            1. aleksejkabanets
              aleksejkabanets April 30 2021 13: 41
              0
              Quote: Lech from Android.
              this is very important in order to initiate a criminal case.

              Are you not afraid to sit down for "extremism"?))))
              Quote: Lech from Android.
              Since you mentioned the three aforementioned characters, tell us how, without the participation of the Americans, they are tearing up the Russian economy ...

              If you remember, I wrote "people like ....". So, in my opinion, the government carrying out liberal economic reforms (privatization, preferences to a large financial and resource oligarchy, etc.) does not serve the country, but the supranational TNCs, and accordingly acts to the detriment of the country's people. For example, the growth in the well-being of citizens of the Russian Federation for 30 years amounted to a little more than 35%, and the growth in the well-being of citizens of the DPRK amounted to a little more than 800%. Will we compare the growth of the economy of China and the Russian Federation over 30 years? But in power all the same people as in the 90s, except that the members of the "Ozero cooperative" were added to them. To be honest, do you think that the Russian economy is showing steady growth?
              1. sleeve
                sleeve 1 May 2021 04: 43
                +2
                Come on, let's compare. And the growth of the PRC and DPRK. But to be honest, through the teaching staff. And with whom to scatter everything per capita. We have a coefficient of 1,15 to all figures (climate, with the PRC it is possible 1,15, not 1,25). In short, we are waiting for the comparison. With the inhabitants of the DPRK in more detail and from the beginning. Where do the numbers come from? Of course you will give a link, but whose analysis is that? Where did 800% come from, from what "line"? What figures are 35% given? Is the multiple drop of the 90s taken into account? Then what is the rise in 20 years? It will be very interesting. I hope you will not stop at a half-phrase, but strike with fact and analytics ...
                1. aleksejkabanets
                  aleksejkabanets 1 May 2021 07: 42
                  -2
                  Quote: sleeve
                  Is the multiple drop of the 90s taken into account?

                  Did not the current "masters of life" arrange this fall?
                  Quote: sleeve
                  More details with the inhabitants of the DPRK and from the beginning. Where do the numbers come from? Of course, give the link ...

                  I'll write everything down, but later, maybe not today. A holiday today. Happy holiday to you, "Spring and Labor" day!
                  1. sleeve
                    sleeve 1 May 2021 11: 36
                    0
                    And you a happy holiday. Peace and labor (both as a name and as a wish) ...
        2. Alex_Bora
          Alex_Bora April 30 2021 13: 22
          +7
          The simplest example is the refinancing rate and freezing of money in funds. And the fact that this is a pillow is all the excuses for deliberately containing the economy. Money is the lifeblood of the economy. And they seized them and continue to seize them.
          1. Lech from Android.
            Lech from Android. April 30 2021 13: 24
            -4
            And it's all?
            It will not be enough.
            1. 2 Level Advisor
              2 Level Advisor April 30 2021 13: 31
              0
              the black widow spider is also small and lets little poison, and the effect is powerful.
              1. Lech from Android.
                Lech from Android. April 30 2021 13: 38
                +1
                You cannot sew this to a criminal case, you need specific facts against a specific person for the court.
                And so your accusations and wording are vague and shaky for the court.
                1. Niko
                  Niko April 30 2021 14: 37
                  +1
                  Quote: Lech from Android.
                  You cannot sew this to a criminal case, you need specific facts against a specific person for the court.
                  And so your accusations and wording are vague and shaky for the court.

                  "Who are the judges?" .....
                2. 2 Level Advisor
                  2 Level Advisor April 30 2021 15: 21
                  -3
                  those. Gref, Naibulina and Siluanov, in your opinion, are working for the good of the Motherland - since there is no criminal case? and Chubais probably? And Colonel Zakharchenko served for the good of the Motherland - exactly until the moment the case was opened?
            2. Alex_Bora
              Alex_Bora April 30 2021 13: 46
              +2
              That is, the fact that the oligarchy brings everything to the west, stolen by officials to the same place, and at the state level for many years, was put into a "money box", and about the availability of "long money" for business (primarily for SMEs) of speech and still does not go; and this is all against the background of zero or almost zero rates in the west, and, accordingly, more competitive conditions for development in comparison with us - is all this not enough for you?
            3. bar
              bar April 30 2021 14: 28
              0
              Quote: Lech from Android.
              And it's all?
              It will not be enough.

              Add "support for the banking system" to another crisis, when these banks used the allocated budget money to buy up foreign currency and take it over the hill.
          2. sleeve
            sleeve 1 May 2021 05: 54
            +1
            What happens from high blood pressure?
        3. Vladimir1155
          Vladimir1155 April 30 2021 14: 23
          0
          Quote: Lech from Android.
          Reveal to us how Gref, Naibulina and Siluanov tore the Russian economy ...

          very simple number 1) "budget rule" Russia transfers half or more of oil and gas revenues to its owner in the United States # 2) superhigh taxes of more than 115 percent per ruble (13 personal income tax + 22nds +20 prib + 35 ees + 12 (property) + about 18ndpi plus about 12-15 MTPL and technical inspection (the last two are paid in private hands) plus a system of extortion by regulatory authorities fire supervision, Rospotreb supervision, aviation grew, State Construction Supervision and about 50 different supervisors, including traffic police), more than 115 pr) cents of the surplus value, with the aim of destroying the strangulation of Russian industry and agriculture and providing the internal market to Western companies # 3) "tax maneuver" = shifting the tax burden on Russians through the growth of the tax burden on foreigners and the abolition of export duties on resources
  5. Yaro Polk
    Yaro Polk April 30 2021 12: 48
    +4
    And the Chinese might think the Amerzians are embarrassed to let them go to the bottom, the Amerzians are so stupid ... horror.
  6. APASUS
    APASUS April 30 2021 12: 48
    +4
    The Americans are back in their repertoire. There is one serious trump card for China, this is the distance. It is not China that rushes to the American shores .................
    1. for
      for April 30 2021 13: 16
      0
      Quote: APASUS
      in the event of a conflict in the open ocean will be allowed
  7. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek April 30 2021 12: 55
    0
    Most likely, this is the case ..... the question now is different - will the US Navy be able to help Taiwan ..... and what% of the fleet will pull.
  8. Trapp1st
    Trapp1st April 30 2021 12: 56
    0
    The American author does not consider such a factor as the fact that China, like the United States, has nuclear weapons.

  9. SVD68
    SVD68 April 30 2021 13: 08
    +2
    Another misinformation article aimed at persuading public opinion in China to the idea of ​​a fleet to "protect the coast."
    1. Pandiurin
      Pandiurin April 30 2021 14: 38
      0
      Quote: SVD68
      Another misinformation article aimed at persuading public opinion in China to the idea of ​​a fleet to "protect the coast."


      China uses sea trade routes.
      If China is blocked from this opportunity, then it will have to say goodbye to the status of the first economy in the world (there will be no resources, no trade, no political influence).
      So he needs a powerful navy.

      The article, of course, is about something else, rather, it is oriented to the west, that the United States, such as wow, seven of them in one fell swoop, drown the AUG of a conditional enemy and do not bear losses themselves)
    2. Niko
      Niko April 30 2021 14: 44
      +3
      Quote: SVD68
      Another misinformation article aimed at persuading public opinion in China to the idea of ​​a fleet to "protect the coast."

      No, "the fleet guarded by the shores" is ours, we will not give the idea to the Chinese. And they will not want to. They have a scribble that is American, that ours does not matter. Yesterday they had 0 aircraft carriers, today 2, tomorrow 3, and the day after tomorrow they can easily compete with the United States in terms of quantity and quality.
      Our reasoning like, we don't need aircraft carriers, these are bourgeois toys, they work
  10. askort154
    askort154 April 30 2021 13: 08
    +4
    American observer: In the event of a conflict in the open ocean, the US Navy will sink Chinese aircraft carriers.

    What a "observer", such are the conclusions. Carrier groups were not created to confront the enemy's AG in the open ocean. They have completely different tasks.
  11. Sayan
    Sayan April 30 2021 13: 09
    0
    Ha, yes, against the kudo of the weaker DPRK, they fumbled, but here they fluffed up against the PRC.
  12. Aleksandr97
    Aleksandr97 April 30 2021 13: 25
    +2
    The question is how many Americans want to die heroically defending the glorious island of Taiwan ??? And compare how much to a similar question from China ??? For China, this is the defense of their possessions, for the striped ones, this is political games !!! Again, it makes no sense for the AUG of China to leave the zones of operation of the DF-21D or DF-26 complexes at 1500 - 5000 km, at least at the initial stage of the hypothetical confrontation. On the other hand, the expert's victory over the Chinese Navy and concern for the protection of democracy in Taiwan word-word ...
  13. aszzz888
    aszzz888 April 30 2021 13: 36
    +2
    American observer: US Navy will sink Chinese aircraft carriers in case of conflict in the open ocean
    Do not count your chickens before they are hatched.
  14. Vladimir1155
    Vladimir1155 April 30 2021 14: 11
    -1
    it is obvious that the American aircraft carrier is the same defenseless target for Chinese submarines and missiles, the aircraft carrier is generally against peaceful small countries
    1. Yuri V.A
      Yuri V.A April 30 2021 15: 02
      -4
      Whether it is a small patrol ship against large militarized powers and blocs.
      1. Vladimir1155
        Vladimir1155 April 30 2021 16: 11
        +3
        Whether it is a large, inconspicuous submarine against large militarized powers and blocs.
        1. Yuri V.A
          Yuri V.A April 30 2021 17: 21
          -1
          So, with an aircraft carrier, the submarine is much more invisible.
    2. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa April 30 2021 20: 34
      -1
      Quote: vladimir1155
      it is obvious that the American aircraft carrier is the same defenseless target for Chinese submarines and missiles,
      Mehu 1135 hello, hi
      Everything is a little bit different. Holmes is an amateur provocateur! And he thinks in WWII categories. Before the AVMA 7 fleet reaches the line of solving the problem, the Virgins and a couple of Sea Wolves will clear the maneuvering area for him from all the NK of the PLA Navy. As regrettable as it may be, this is exactly what follows from the tactics of using AMG. US Navy strength in stock and excellent quality PLA. The weakness of the PLA Navy is in their absence. What the Celestial Empire has today is buckets of bolts and nuts at the level of our 2nd generation submarines. And I haven’t heard that the hunfuz are very eager to overcome this gap. There is no base, no G / A, no torpedoes like the Mk-48/7 ... Therefore, everything is very difficult. But NK whales will be drowned primarily by submarines and Hornets. And the threat to AVMA is really only Dong Feng, 21D and 26 cars. But they need a clear command control ... with which, by the way, we can help on the occasion ... What can't you do to the Yankees! Again, comrade. Xi loves our ice cream very much, and DB is inadequate radish ... bully
      1. Vladimir1155
        Vladimir1155 April 30 2021 20: 49
        0
        Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
        US Navy strength in stock and excellent quality PLA. The weakness of the PLA Navy is in their absence. What the Celestial Empire has today is buckets of bolts and nuts at the level of our 2nd generation submarines. And I haven’t heard that the hunfuz are very eager to overcome this gap.

        it means, unfortunately, there were no specialists like me in the PRC (I have many advantages, but most importantly tongue ... this is modesty) and they mistakenly do not develop submarines, but are spent on dozens of NKs, apparently succumbing to Timokhin and his henchmen, who want to plunge our country into the same mistake ... but as far as I know, China still develops submarines too
  15. CastroRuiz
    CastroRuiz April 30 2021 14: 12
    -1
    But maybe the bit INTO TsN will launch the US BR family DF to the bottom of the mission.
  16. alexey2073
    alexey2073 April 30 2021 14: 22
    +2
    Therefore, the only way out for China is to impose its own model of warfare on the Americans.
    How did they want? It can not be any other way. This is the basis, and is given in all textbooks on tactics and strategy in the 1st year of military schools. What's in the Soviet, what's in others ...
  17. kventinasd
    kventinasd April 30 2021 14: 31
    0
    The task of American propaganda is to create an image of China as a weaker adversary, which the United States has no cost to defeat.

    American girls are puffing up in hysteria, trying to maintain at least some hegemony in the world, but recently other major players have become increasingly wiped out by their capabilities and desires. Where can they compete with China if they have little gut against Iran and North Korea? In 10 years, the Chinese will finally bury the US economy, concentrating their exports to domestic and other markets. Already now, the Chinese every year build 2 times more highways than the entire European Union and the United States, and on high-speed highways, the Chinese have no equal.
  18. cniza
    cniza April 30 2021 14: 38
    +2
    The American author does not consider such a factor as the fact that China, like the United States, has nuclear weapons.


    They were bored, they wanted to have fun ...
  19. jaroff
    jaroff April 30 2021 14: 54
    +2
    It's all about tactics. The main thing is to destroy the supply of communications for the entire group. Only one pre-emptive flight, destroy the entire so-called. "subservient" of the aircraft carrier group. Per circle it will cost less in terms of ammunition consumption than to attack and disable the aircraft carrier
  20. NF68
    NF68 April 30 2021 16: 24
    0
    The Chinese, too, will not remain in debt.
  21. Prisoner
    Prisoner April 30 2021 16: 59
    +1
    Who will let who in here is a dark matter. Don't say "gop" as they say.
  22. 1536
    1536 April 30 2021 20: 50
    +1
    Something tells me that if the conflict between the United States and the PRC becomes real, then US citizens will begin to starve to death, since it is known that a huge percentage of the restaurant, snack and service business in the United States belongs to the Chinese and Chinese capital. (Americans don’t understand what it’s like to come home from work and start cooking dinner at the gas stove. They go to a nearby restaurant or snack bar, or order takeaway.) Plus, the main US monopolies in leading industries, including and the military, as well as the information technology sphere, are directly related to China and use China as their "production workshop". Something has not yet been heard from the Chinese leaders that the wages of Chinese workers and engineers at the enterprises of American concerns located directly in the PRC are low and it is necessary to fight for its increase, that taxes from the activities of these factories that go to the Chinese treasury have become this treasury do not suit.
    The American so-called government is well aware of all this. If it really wants to start a serious conflict with China, it will soon begin to reduce the share of Chinese business in the above-mentioned sectors of the economy and withdraw its enterprises from its territory. This, by the way, was what Donald Trump wanted, but he lost, perhaps because of the fears of the capitalists of the two countries associated with an imminent war if these plans were implemented. Sleeping Joe will never follow Trump's path, not for that he found himself in the White House. Thus, if all this does not happen, then talking about a "war" with China and the destruction of each other's aircraft carriers is another bluff of the sleeping Joe and his gang. And nothing more.
  23. sleeve
    sleeve April 30 2021 20: 53
    0
    And where is the navy crazy and the Chinese aircraft carriers? They are exclusively for India. And they are baked like cakes in order to quickly create an advantage over the Indians at sea, which automatically leads to victory, since the naval blockade is fatal for them, unlike the PRC. They also have overland logistics along the Transsib. And the Indians have ... the Himalayas and Pakistan. Why would the Chinese be lashed out with crazy, the main sales market? Why go crazy trying to stay without a quarter of the domestic trade? But the change in the dominant in the dispute between the two "billionaires" is cool. And the Indians do not shine in the competition.
    But when the "reprobable" crazy with aircraft carriers at the price of a normal military budget will overstrain, and they simply strive for this, a normal confrontation in the usual sea race will immediately begin. By that time, we just need to refresh the Pacific Fleet to the level of "I won't come myself, I won't let me in."
  24. echo
    echo 1 May 2021 07: 24
    0
    there are stupid people in this world, there are and are Americans, are there any questions?
  25. Alex Justice
    Alex Justice 1 May 2021 11: 31
    -1
    Are they measured with letters?
  26. Decimalegio
    Decimalegio 1 May 2021 12: 08
    0
    Flawless analysis. If a naval battle took place in the China Sea, the US Navy would be in trouble. But in a hypothetical offshore confrontation far from land-based systems, it is the Chinese fleet that could
    Problems.
  27. Viktor Sergeev
    Viktor Sergeev 1 May 2021 12: 30
    0
    Whoever argues, they will let in, like the Chinese, American aircraft carriers, then a sickly exchange of nuclear strikes, then the Americans will rejoice.
  28. Observer.
    Observer. 27 May 2021 19: 53
    0
    The Americans have tremendous experience of using aircraft carriers in real wars. Only the Japanese have an idea. Therefore, one US AUG is enough to destroy the entire Chinese fleet, which has absolute zero experience.