Empire of Genghis Khan and Khorezm. Last Hero

60
Jalal ad-Din Menguberdi is considered a national hero by citizens of four Central Asian states: Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Afghanistan. Uzbekistan was the first of them to make an official attempt to secure the right to consider it "their own." A monument was erected to him in the city of Urgench (this is not Gurganj, which was the capital of Khorezm, but a city founded by immigrants from there).

Empire of Genghis Khan and Khorezm. Last Hero

Monument to Jalal ad-Din in Urgench




Two coins with his image are issued.





In the 1999 year, quite large-scale events were held in Uzbekistan dedicated to its 800 anniversary.

Finally, on 30 of August 2000 in Uzbekistan, the highest military order of Zhaloliddin Manguberdi was established.



He was born in Khorezm in the 1199 year. AT stories This was not the most peaceful time for humanity. The armies of the West, with a cross and a sword, went one after another to fight with Muslims, pagans and their own heretics. A terrible force was rising in the East, which would soon shake the whole world, splashing out of the Mongolian steppes. On the year of his birth, Celal ad-Din, on his way to England, died the mortally wounded Richard the Lionheart. For 6 years before his birth, the great Salah ad-Din died in Damascus, a year later the Teutonic Order was created in Palestine. Soon after his birth, Riga was founded (1201), the Order of the Swordsmen (1202) appeared, his future enemy Temujin conquered the Keraite (1203) and Naiman (1204) khanates. Under the blow of the crusaders, Constantinople fell. Ahead was the Great Kurultai, who proclaimed Temujin "the khan of all people who lived in felt tents from Altai to Argun and from the Siberian taiga to the Chinese wall." (It was on it that he was given the title of Genghis Khan - “a khan as great as the ocean”, Lake Baikal was meant by the ocean).


Generic banner of Genghis Khan. Drawing from the book of E. Hara-Davan “Genghis Khan as a commander and his legacy”



Elevated to the throne, Temujin proclaims himself Genghis Khan. On the right are his sons Ugadei and Jochi. From the illustrated manuscript of Rashid ad-Din


The Albigensian wars would soon begin, and the crusaders would conquer Livonia.

Khorezmshah Jalal ad-Din


As already mentioned in the first article of the cycle (Empire of Genghis Khan and Khorezm. The beginning of the confrontation), Jalal ad-Din was the eldest son of Khorezmshah Mohammed II. But his mother was a Turkmen, and therefore, due to the intrigues of his own grandmother, who came from the influential family of Ashig, he was deprived of the title of heir to the throne. In 1218, during the battle with the Mongols in the Turgai Valley, Jalal ad-Din saved his army and father with his bold and decisive actions. During the Mongol invasion in 1219, he called on the Khorezmshah not to divide the army and give the enemies an open battle in the field. But Muhammad II did not trust him, and almost until his death he kept to himself, thereby destroying himself and his state. Only shortly before his death, at the end of the 1220 of the year, Muhammad finally transferred power to him in the already almost dead state. An-Nasawi writes:
“When the illness of the Sultan on the island intensified, and he found out that his mother was captured, he called on Jalal ad-Din and his two brothers, Uzlag Shah and Ak Shah, who were on the island, and said:“ The bonds of power were broken, the foundations powers are weakened and destroyed. It became clear what the goals of this enemy: its claws and teeth clung tightly to the country. Only my son Mankburn can avenge him for me. And so I appoint him heir to the throne, and both of you must obey him and take the path of following him. " Then he personally attached his sword to Jalal ad-Din's thigh. After that, he survived only a few days and died, having appeared before his Lord. "


Too late. According to al-Nasawi, Khorezm “looked like a tent without supporting ropes”. Jalal ad-Din managed to break into Gurganj and show his will to his father, but this city was the patrimony of the hater of the new Khorezmshah - Terken-Khatyn, and her supporters, who declared the ruler of her brother - Khumar-tegin. A conspiracy was drawn up against Jalal ad-Din, and his assassination was planned. Upon learning of this, the Khorezmshah, not recognized here, went south. There were only 300 horsemen with him, among whom was the hero of the defense of Khojend - Timur-Melik. Near Nisa, they defeated a Mongol detachment of 700 people and made their way to Nishapur. Jalal ad-Din was in this city for about a month, sending orders to the leaders of the tribes and the rulers of the surrounding cities, then went to Ghazna, defeating the Mongols besieging Kandahar along the way. Here he was joined by his cousin Uncle Amin al-Mulk, who brought about 10 thousands of soldiers. In Ghazna, the ruler of Balkh, Seyf ad-din Agraq, the Afghan leader Muzaffar-Malik, and al-Hasan brought the Karluks to him. Ibn al-Asir claims that all Jalal al-Din was able to collect then 60 thousand soldiers. He did not intend to sit out in the fortresses. Firstly, he knew very well that the Mongols knew how to take fortified cities, and secondly, he always preferred active actions. According to al-Nasawi, one of the close associates of Jalal ad-din, who apparently knew the new Khorezmshah well, once turned to him:

“It’s not good if someone like you hides in some kind of fortress, even if it was built between the constellations Ursa Major and Ursa Minor, on top of the constellation Gemini, or even higher and further.”


And, indeed, at the slightest danger of being blocked by the Mongols in the city, Jalal ad-Din immediately left him to enter the field battle, or to withdraw his troops.

First victories


Jalal ad-Din was a realist, and did not seek to free the territories occupied by the Mongols of Khorasan and Maverannahr, he tried to preserve the south and southeast of the Khorezmshah state. Moreover, the main forces of the invaders continued the war in Khorezm. Genghis Khan's troops captured Termez, his sons Chagatai and Ogedei, united with Jochi, took Gurganj in April 1221, the youngest son, Toluy, captured Merv in March, and Nishapur in April. Moreover, in Nishapur, by his order, pyramids were built from human heads:

“They (the Mongols) chopped off the heads of those killed from their bodies and put them in piles, laying the heads of men separately from the heads of women and children”
(Juvaini).

Herat resisted for 8 months, but also fell.

And in 1221, Jalal ad-din defeated the Mongol detachment, besieging the fortress of Valiyan, and then gave the Mongols a battle near the city of Parvan (“the battle at seven gorges”). This battle lasted two days, and, on the orders of the Khorezmshah, his cavalrymen fought in a hurry. On the second day, when the Mongol horses were tired, Jalal ad-Din led a horse attack, which led to the complete defeat of the Mongol army. This victory led to an uprising in some of the cities previously captured by the Mongols. In addition, having learned about it, the Mongol detachment, besieging the fortress of Balkh, moved north.


Fortress of Khorezm


The captured Mongols were executed. Al-Nasawi describes Jelal ad-Din's revenge as follows:

“Many prisoners were taken, so the servants brought the people they had captured to him (Jalal ad-Din) and drove the stakes into their ears, settling scores with them. Jalal ad-Din was happy and looked at it with a beaming smile on his face ... Sitting in the saddle of hatred, Jalal ad-din cut off the ends of the neck veins with his swords, separated his shoulders from the places where they meet. How else? After all, they caused great suffering to him, his brothers and father, his state, his relatives, and his close associates, who guarded him. He was left without a father and offspring, without a master and without a slave, misfortune cast him in the steppe, and danger brought him to the desert. ”


Alas, his army soon decreased by half: the Khalaj, Pashtun and Karluk detachments left Jalal ad-Din because their leaders could not agree on the division of the spoils, in particular, a quarrel over a trophy thoroughbred stallion was said:

“Anger began to boil in their minds, as they saw that they could not achieve a fair divide. And no matter how hard Jalal ad-Din tried to satisfy them ... they became even angrier and more restrained in their treatment ... they did not want to see what the consequences would be ... When Jalal ad-Din thanked them to return, and sent ambassadors for a lasting alliance, the Türks answered hatred ... and they left him. "

(An-Nasawi.)

Battle of the Indus River


Meanwhile, the troubled Genghis Khan personally led a new campaign against Jalal ad-Din. On November 24 1221 (December 9 according to other sources) in the territory of modern Pakistan, the Mongol army, from 50 to 80 thousands, met with the thirty thousandth Khorezm army. Before the enemy approached, the young Khorezmshah intended to cross to the other side, but he was not lucky: the storm damaged the ships under construction, and Genghis Khan drove his soldiers for two days, without stopping even to prepare food. Jalal al-Din still managed to defeat his vanguard, but this clash was his last success.


Mongolian cavalry


Despite the apparent superiority of the Mongols in power, the battle was extremely stubborn and fierce. Jalal ad-Din built the army with a crescent moon, leaning on the mountains with his left flank and the river bend with his right. Genghis Khan, confident of victory, ordered to capture him alive.


Mongol warriors XII-XIII centuries. Figure from the book P.V. Ostapenko "The History of the Secret War in the Middle Ages"


The Khorezmshah army repelled two attacks on the left flank, a heavy battle ensued on the right, in which the Mongols were already crowding out opponents. And then Jalal ad-Din himself attacked the Mongols in the center. Genghis Khan even had to introduce reserve units into the battle.


The battle of the soldiers of Genghis Khan with the soldiers of Jalal-ad-Din. Persian miniature


The fate of the battle was decided by the one and only Mongolian Tumen (they say that it was called the “Hero”), which Genghis Khan sent in advance to make his way to the Khorezm rear through the mountains. His blow led to the collapse of the left flank of the Khorezm army, and the flight of all other formations. Jalal ad-Din, at the head of select units, fought surrounded. Having finally broken through to the river, he directed his horse into the water, and jumped into the river directly on it, fully armed and with a banner in his hand - from a seven-meter cliff.

G. Raverty and G. E. Grumm-Grzhimailo report that the place of this crossing by locals is still called Cheli Jalali (Geli Jalali).


Jalal ad-Din crosses the Indus River, fleeing Genghis Khan. Mughal miniature of the 16th century


Juvaini writes:

“Seeing him (Jalal ad-din) floating on the river, Genghis Khan drove up to the very edge of the coast. The Mongols wanted to rush after him, but he stopped them. "They lowered their bows, and those who witnessed this said that while their arrows reached, the water in the river was red with blood."



Mongolian archer, Chinese painting, 13th century


Many warriors followed the example of Jalal ad-Din, but not everyone managed to escape: you remember that the Mongols shot them with bows and, "wherever their arrows reached, the water in the river was red with blood."

Juvaini continues:

“As for the Sultan, he came out of the water with a sword, spear and shield. Genghis Khan and all the Mongols put their hands to their lips in amazement, and Genghis Khan, seeing that feat, said, turning to his sons:
“These are the sons every father dreams of!”


A similar description is given by Rashid ad-Din, who adds only that before the battle, Genghis Khan ordered to take Jalal ad-Din alive.


Jalal ad-Din, who covered the withdrawal of his troops, and then escaped swimming with a horse through the Indus, wipes his sword dry before the amazed by his courage Genghis Khan (a 17th century miniature from the work of M. B. O. Kuhistani “Ta'rikh-i Abu- l-khayr hani ")


According to legend, before rushing into the water, Jalal ad-Din ordered to kill his mother and all his wives in order to save them from the shame of captivity. However, it was unlikely that he had time for this. It is believed that part of his family died during the crossing over the Indus, part - was captured. It is reported, for example, that the son of Jalal ad-Din, who was 7 or 8 years old, was executed in the presence of Genghis Khan.

Jalal ad-Din managed to collect about 4 of thousands of surviving soldiers, with them he went deep into India, where he won two victories over the local princes in Lahore and Punjab.

Genghis Khan was unable to ferry his army across the Indus. He went upstream to Peshevar, and his son Ugedei was sent to the city of Ghazni, which was captured and destroyed.

The return of Khorezmshah


In the spring of 1223, Genghis Khan left Afghanistan, and in 1224, Jalal ad-Din came to western Iran and Armenia. By 1225, he was able to restore his power in some of the former provinces of Khorezm - in Fars, Eastern Iraq, Azerbaijan. He defeated one of the Mongol armies at Isfahan and defeated Georgia. Juvaini reports that the Kipchaks who were in the Georgian army refused to fight in a decisive battle against him:

“When the Georgian army approached, the soldiers of the Sultan took their weapon, and the sultan ascended a high mountain to better view the enemy. On the right, he saw twenty thousand warriors with Kipchak signs and banners. Calling Koshkar, he gave him bread and salt and sent him to the Kipchaks to remind them of their obligation to him. During the reign of his father, they were chained and humiliated, and through his mediation he saved them and interceded for them before his father. Didn’t they now draw their swords against him, did they violate their obligations? For this reason, the Kipchak army refrained from the battle and, immediately leaving the battlefield, was located away from the rest. ”


In 1226, the Khorezm army captured and burned Tbilisi.

The character of Jalal ad-Din by that time had changed significantly. Iranian historian Dabir Seyyaji wrote about this:

“How short, so magnificent, speaking very good and apologizing for the rudeness caused ...

On to describe many good nature Sultan greatly influenced many ills, evils and difficulties, than to some extent justified by his cruelty, which, especially at the end of his life. "


The great adversary of Jalal ad-Din, Genghis Khan, died in 1227.

Since 2012, his birthday, scheduled for the first day of the first winter month of the lunar calendar, has become a national holiday of Mongolia - Day of pride. On this day there is a ceremony honoring his statue in the central square of the capital.


Statue of Genghis Khan. Ulaanbaatar



Genghis Khan on the stamp of Mongolia



Statue of a Mongol warrior at the Government House, Ulaanbaatar


Until the 1229 year, the Mongols were not up to the rebellious Khorezmshah: they chose the great khan. In 1229, the third son of Genghis Khan, Ogedei, became such.


Khan Ugedei and the Mongol Empire in 1229-1241


Hero's death


Meanwhile, the successful operations of Jalal ad-Din caused concern in neighboring countries, as a result of united against him Sultanate of Rum, the Egyptian Ayyubids and the Armenian Kingdom of Cilicia. Together they inflicted two defeats on the Khorezmians. And in 1229, Ugadei sent three tumens to the Caucasus to fight him. Jalal ad-Din defeated, once again tried to retreat to India - this time unsuccessfully, and, wounded, was forced into hiding in the mountains of eastern Turkey. But he died not from a Mongol arrow or saber, but from the hand of a Kurd who remained unknown. The killer’s motives are still unclear: some believe that he was the blood enemy of Jalal ad-Din, others believe that he was sent by the Mongols, others believe that he was simply flattered by his belt, studded with diamonds, and did not even know the name of his victim. It is believed that this happened on 15 of August 1231 of the year.

This ingenious commander died so ingloriously, who, under other circumstances, might have stopped Genghis Khan and founded his empire, similar to the state of Timur, radically changing the course of history of all mankind.
60 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +10
    5 November 2019 05: 46
    Thank you!
    Regards, Vlad!
    1. The comment was deleted.
  2. +5
    5 November 2019 05: 54
    Thank. All 3 articles were very interesting and informative.
    1. +5
      5 November 2019 06: 28
      extremely "tasty" article. thanks. hi
  3. +4
    5 November 2019 07: 10
    Thank. Very interesting. It turns out I somehow missed the first two articles. I'll try searching for it now.
  4. +4
    5 November 2019 07: 28
    The preface, which describes political events in other parts of the world at this time, is a good and useful thing.
    1. +2
      6 November 2019 00: 57
      But he died not from a Mongol arrow or saber, but from the hand of a Kurd who remained unknown. The killer’s motives are still unclear: some believe that he was the blood enemy of Jalal ad-Din, others believe that he was sent by the Mongols, others believe that he was simply flattered by his belt, studded with diamonds, and did not even know the name of his victim.

      given the Kurdish mentality, the third option is the most believable
  5. +6
    5 November 2019 07: 39
    Well, the author presented a very interesting cycle ... Thank you !!!
    ___
    And the Georgians then faced the same thing that they had already seen in the Battle of Manzkert - when the Turkic (Oguzes) mercenaries from the Byzantine emperor, hearing night songs of the Seljuks, switched in the morning to the side of their relatives, Seljuks ...
  6. +5
    5 November 2019 07: 41
    Yes indeed. The cycle is well conceived and executed perfectly. Bravo, Valery!
  7. +4
    5 November 2019 08: 06
    This ingenious commander died so ingloriously, who under other circumstances, perhaps, would have stopped Genghis Khan and founded his empire, similar to the state of Timur

    Twice completely defeated by the Mongols and fled twice.

    Outstanding? No.

    interesting article, thanks to the author.
    1. +7
      5 November 2019 18: 26
      But he managed to inflict tactical defeats on the Mongols several times. And there were very few such commanders.
  8. +5
    5 November 2019 08: 16
    If I am not mistaken, then according to the legend Jelal ad-Din, having crossed the Indus, threatened Chinggis Khan with his sword, and it was after this that Chingi Khan said, “These are the sons every father dreams of!” or "This is how a son should be," or "This is how my sons should be." I think if Khorezm were mono-national, it would have managed to restrain the Mongols. And so, feudal, national and even religious fragmentation did not allow Khorezm to repulse the Mongols. Kangly with kindred Kipchaks, Turkmens, Iranians, Afghans, Indians - that is still a hodgepodge.
  9. -7
    5 November 2019 08: 20
    Author, do you know where Tatarstan and Mongolia are located? why did you have Persia turned into the Tatar-Mongols?

    1. +3
      5 November 2019 08: 51
      Quote: Boris55
      ... do you know where Tatarstan and Mongolia are located? why did you have Persia turned into the Tatar-Mongols?

      Well, here we can say that after the Persian Muslim massacre, Persia became a passage yard for every Turk
    2. +8
      5 November 2019 09: 26
      Quote: Boris55
      why did you have Persia turned into the Tatar-Mongols?

      For about the same reason that Constantinople became Istanbul.
      1. -2
        5 November 2019 10: 56
        Quote: HanTengri
        For about the same reason that Constantinople became Istanbul.

        Thank you, now I will know where the Tatars with the Mongols live. laughing
        1. +4
          5 November 2019 11: 28
          From the 330 of the year, the city of Byzantium was called New Rome (renamed by Emperor Constantine), from the 1453 of the year - Constantinople (renamed by Sultan Mehmed II), from the 1930 of the year - Istanbul (renamed by President Ataturk).
  10. +3
    5 November 2019 08: 32
    Quote: Pecheneg
    And so, feudal, national and still religious fragmentation did not allow Khorezm to repulse the Mongols. Kangles with related Kipchaks, Turkmens, Iranians, Afghans, Indians - that is also a hodgepodge.

    Well, the same hodgepodge, half a century after these events, did not prevent the Confederation of Turkic Peoples, which included the Afghans, from poisoning dushmans on a campaign to ruin Isfahan ...
    It is already these days that the Persians seek to reason with the Afghans that blood is more important than shades of religion ... But, as in the case of Byzantium, the Persians will first receive a blow in the West, from the false crusaders of our day ...
    1. +3
      5 November 2019 11: 16
      Good afternoon, Karen! hi I read your post with interest. One question, who do you mean by "false crusaders of our day" and why "false"? I think I can guess who we are talking about, but I would like to hear from you.
      1. +4
        5 November 2019 11: 38
        Good afternoon, Konstantin!
        So I mean those who are pushing Western "values" with a sword ...
        1. +3
          5 November 2019 11: 44
          Well, I thought so. smile
  11. +3
    5 November 2019 10: 51
    Valery, thank you, successful material, successful cycle. smile
    I want to note one fragment:
    the success of Jalal ad-Din caused concern of neighboring countries, as a result, the Koni Sultanate, the Egyptian Ayyubids and the Cilician Armenian state united against him

    The term "successful actions" here should be understood not as actions against the Mongol empire, but actions to take away some of the adjacent territories in Transcaucasia in their favor from their western neighbors. I am extremely curious: for what devil Jelal ad-Din, having an uncompromising and not completely stopped Mongol empire in the east, suddenly decided to quarrel with his neighbors in the west? What political or strategic considerations caused his campaigns in Georgia and Armenia?
    Looking from our today's bell tower, it would be more logical to assume that having received a "pause" from the Mongols in connection with the death of Genghis Khan, Jalal ad-Din had to use it to strengthen his own army, search for allies to fight the Mongolian empire, to prepare the ground for " reconquest ". Instead of trying to return "his own", he began to take away "alien", which ultimately predetermined his fate.
    What is this: the lack of political talent and the ability to predict the development of events and, as a result, the fatal mistake of Jalal ad-Din or an urgent need due to some incomprehensible reasons that made him unleash a war on two fronts? What do you say, colleagues?
    1. VLR
      +5
      5 November 2019 11: 10
      I think that he took the path of least resistance: he began to "carve out" a state for himself at the expense of weaker neighbors. This, of course, was short-sighted, but the Mongols weakened their onslaught for the period of the choice of the Great Khan, and Jelal ad-Din, perhaps, thought that they would not come again: either the children and grandchildren of Chinggis would quarrel among themselves, or others for the new khan, not yet ravaged by war, countries will be more interesting. After Kalka, the Russian princes also did not understand anything: the Lord punished for their sins, but he himself delivered the Mongols who had come from nowhere, perhaps they will never come again.
      1. +4
        5 November 2019 12: 42
        Quote: VlR
        Russian princes after Kalki

        I also came up with this analogy, despite the fact that "any analogy is false." smile
        But with Russia, the situation was still somewhat different. Having won the Kalka, the Mongols went into the steppes, for the Russian princes, in fact, in oblivion and again appeared in their area of ​​attention only after more than ten years - a period sufficient to move away from the shock. For Jalal ad-Din, the situation was different - the Mongols purposefully mowed up the local elite and introduced their direct control on the conquered lands, that is, they did not disappear anywhere. He managed to recapture part of the land, but only part. Assume that this will end, as it seems now (keywords smile ), was an extreme degree of naivety and optimism.
        If we assume a priori that Jalal ad-Din was not a naive and short-sighted person, it remains only to assume that some reasons not reflected in the sources prompted him to the decision to start a war in the west.
        And here there is room for imagination of the novelists - what undercover intrigues and passions raged at the parties to the conflict, what diplomatic maneuvers were undertaken by the parties to quarrel their enemies, bribery, betrayal, chases, night fights, poison, dagger, noose, honey traps, harem diplomacy, honor and valor, meanness and treason, Christians, Muslims, pagans ... And all this with oriental flavor ... Eh ...
        feel feel feel
        Anton, about the tank is not necessary, we know that he was there too. smile
        1. -4
          5 November 2019 14: 04
          ... I just can’t understand, and everyone is embarrassed to explain how the Mongols and Tatars from the 20th century got to the battle on the Kalka River ... The Tatars became one in the year 192 by the decision of V. Ulyanov-Blanca, when he christened the Tatars * * Volga Bulgars .., and until that time - Tatar - an equestrian warrior .. The Mongols became the Mongols the same with the formation of the MPR in those same years ... This is noodles, or spreading cranberries ... that you need to believe ..
          1. +1
            5 November 2019 14: 22
            Stubbornness is the dignity of donkeys.
            The Moal people in the XNUMXth century? No, you haven't. "Mungal Steppe" in Russian documents of the XNUMXth and XNUMXth centuries? No, we don’t know. And we don’t want to hear and know too. All this is fake and falsification.
            Quote: ver_
            everyone is shy to explain

            I explain. No embarrassment. Mongols from the XX century. there was no Kalka. There were Mongols from the 13th century on Kalka. and they got there, riding horses from the Great Steppe, that part of it that is north of modern China. Do not give thanks.
            I will not comment on the rest of your nonsense. You know, there is such a saying, censoredly it can be expressed like this: "making love with stupid women is to deprive your genital organ of spice." For you, this means that to parse and criticize your comments in detail is to be disrespectful to yourself.
            Take care of yourself and good luck.
            1. -4
              5 November 2019 17: 11
              ... for the gifted - no one could go through the Scythians, who blocked China .., and the uprisings of the disgruntled * Mongols *, the Chinese cut to the root without any regret and repeatedly ..
              1. +7
                5 November 2019 18: 56
                Quote: ver_
                ... for the gifted - no one could go through the Scythians, who blocked China .., and the uprisings of the disgruntled * Mongols *, the Chinese cut to the root without any regret and repeatedly ..

                Ver question for filling, and where did the Buryats come from?
                So, so as not to frighten the Scythians with the Chinese, I will tell you that they were originally written in our scribal and clerics books as “fraternal Mongols” !!!
                Respectfully, ps, why did the Chukchi move north in the 12th century?
                1. +3
                  5 November 2019 20: 51
                  Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
                  Ver question backfill, and where did the Buryats come from

                  Vlad, welcome. smile
                  I remembered the joke:
                  Geologists in the taiga installed a drilling rig. The local tungus approaches one, pokes a finger at the tower and asks:
                  “What are they doing there?”
                  - Buryat.
                  He thought a little:
                  - No, they drill, but they don’t do it that way ...
                  smile
                  I can argue that you cannot drag this character into a discussion. smile
                  1. +3
                    6 November 2019 04: 42
                    The point is not in the discussion of Michael, but in banal perseverance. It’s like according to Jung “I don’t see, I don’t feel, I don’t touch, so it’s not”!
                    So I want to exclaim "the boy was"! The expansion of the Tatar-Mongol (Mongol-Tatars) - this does not mean that only Tatars or Mongols participated in it, however, as well as the invasions of the Huns and other peoples. Simplification of global processes of migration and expansion, when they fell to the knees of civilization and the country, is not even funny, but sad! Especially the evidence, at the level of pulling the blankets over yourself!
                    Regards, Vlad!
                2. 0
                  6 November 2019 09: 27
                  ... because they moved that the Scythians left because of desertification - it’s necessary to eat (only Scythian burial mounds remained), the Halki tribes * hooked * in the river basin * Halka ..., the Ayrov tribes, which include ours Buryats left in the present Chita and Irkutsk regions .... Wandering is not a hasty business — they eat animal feed in one place, transport a yurt to another and so wander around within their lands ... This was all shown by Senkevich in the program .. Cinema Travel Club ..
        2. +1
          5 November 2019 18: 14
          No, well, okay ?! "Anton, don't talk about the tank." They themselves imposed this baidu on me, and now "no need" ??? No, comrades, they loaded the ring of Omnipotence, now bear with it !!!
          Of course, I did not Nazgul, still work and work on the image, but my marginality is enough for everyone!
          1. 0
            5 November 2019 20: 40
            Quote: 3x3zsave
            No, okay ?!

            There in Jamaica, this gadget turned out to be very appropriate, why shouldn’t it appear in Tabriz or Shiraz? smile
            Anyway, why in Shiraz?
            No matter how beautiful Shiraz
            He is no better than Ryazan expanses

            Give the tank to Evpatia Kolovrat!
            With the combat march "Atu Batu, atu! Atu Batu!" to the tune of the song of Gverdtsiteli, under the roar of an engine on a rum drive, accompanied by young mulatto women, at the sight of which even arrows and spears of Mongolian bagatura will rush to the sky (not to mention everything else) - to attack! So we will win!
            No, Anton, if you're sorry, then, of course, let the gadget remain in Jamaica. But "three hundred years of the Tatar yoke" will then remain on your conscience.
            smile
            1. 0
              5 November 2019 21: 33
              Quote: Trilobite Master
              No, Anton, if you feel sorry, then, of course, let the gadget remain in Jamaica. But "three hundred years of the Tatar yoke" will then remain on your conscience.

              Well, now, to the question: "Who is to blame?" the answer has already been found! Now, following the Russian mental tradition, all that remains is to find the answer to the question: "What to do?" and we will live! lol
      2. +5
        5 November 2019 18: 15
        Thanks for the article, Valery, good style, historically, colorful, what else is needed? good

        Although, as I already said, for the Christian peoples of the Near East, Jalaladdin was a bloody maniac, no more - he really had some kind of inexplicable, pathological craving for the destruction of Christians.

        Here is the Orthodox image of the "100.000 martyrs of Tbilisi" very well conveying the essence of what was happening, when Jalaladdin's army captured the capital of Georgia and massacred almost all of its Christian residents who did not want to convert to Islam:

        And such acts of simply insane genocide of Christians were committed by Khorezmians repeatedly!

        Quote: VlR
        or to the new khan, other countries that have not yet been ravaged by war will be more interesting.

        In fact, the main front of Genghis Khan was always the immense China, which will be conquered by the end only under Khubilai! Central Asia for him was a secondary direction, and Eastern Europe with the Caucasus was generally a "third front".

        Quote: VlR
        After the Kalka, Russian princes didn’t understand anything either.

        In fact, they most likely understood - since they began to collect information about events in the previously so distant Near and Middle East much more actively. In fact, they began to organize through merchants a certain analogue of the intelligence service ...
        And, paradoxically, but from the 1230x years. in Russia, the princes knew about the impending invasion ...
        1. -1
          5 November 2019 19: 19
          Quote: Mikhail Matyugin
          In fact, the main front of Genghis Khan remained the vast China all the time, which would be subjugated only at the end of the Khubilai!

          So for Timur, the same thought in his head (China) turned out to be saving for Russia ...
    2. +3
      5 November 2019 20: 00
      It seems that the sword could no longer be sheathed. And slowly you become a hostage to the situation, you change yourself.

      This is probably the key question - how much can the situation be controlled?
  12. +5
    5 November 2019 11: 03
    Turanian Shah - why not the Mongol Khan or the Arab Sultan? laughing

    The Mongol empire of the 1241 model of the year on the MPR mail sheet is depicted with two parts (Turan and Russia), separated from the main territory by a dashed line, which symbolizes vassalism, and not joining the empire.
  13. -3
    5 November 2019 11: 05
    Ryzhov recklessly uses illustrations, both modern reconstructions of the Mongols, and illustrations from the manuscripts of Jalal ad Din. But did the propagandist historian Ryzhov ask himself where did these manuscripts come from with illustrations?
    I give an excerpt from an article by Mirgaliyev I.M.



    https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/shuab-i-pandzhgana-rashid-ad-dina-perspektivy-izucheniya

    So in the "Collection of Chronicles" of Shuab ad Panjgan (Five genealogies) Jelal ad Din located in Istanbul in Topkala, there are NO illustrations.
    So where did these "beautiful miniatures" in the Collection of Chronicles come from? This should be asked from the St. Petersburg historian Grigoriev, although it is already impossible to ask him or his co-author Telitsyn, that's what he said.




    what can you say? As you can see, the story of the appearance of these illustrations is very muddy and fabricated - these illustrations are most likely already in the 20th century.
    1. +2
      5 November 2019 13: 25
      Quote: Bar2
      As you can see the story of the appearance of these illustrations is very muddy and fabricated - these illustrations are most likely already in 20в.

      Oh, these new settlers ...
      This is "most likely" right, well, well, quite in Samson's way. From the series "it is obvious that", "no doubt", "any sane person understands" ... As something muddy for them - so immediately the XX century, well, if you're lucky, then XVIII - XIX ... Here, I believe that the real manuscripts, where the light-bearded and blue-eyed Genghis Khan with the Russian alphabet in his hands and a fiery cross on his chest, were seized, and instead of them the Masters of the West pasted some narrow-eyed people into the manuscript. laughing
      Quote from the wiki:
      A 120-page fragment of one of Jami 'at-tawarih's illustrated manuscripts in Arabic was sold on July 8, 1980 at Sotheby's by the Royal Asiatic Society to an unknown buyer for £ 850. This was the largest amount ever paid for an Arabic manuscript.

      Those who don't trust the wiki can check the information. But, "most likely" ( laughing ), in this case the way it is.
  14. +7
    5 November 2019 12: 49
    But he died not from a Mongol arrow or saber, but from the hand of a Kurd who remained unknown. The killer’s motives are still unclear: some believe that he was the blood enemy of Jalal ad-Din, others believe that he was sent by the Mongols, others believe that he was simply flattered by his belt, studded with diamonds, and did not even know the name of his victim.
    If we proceed from what the secretary and biographer of Jalal ad-Din Shihab al-Din Muhammad al-Nasawi writes about this event in the Life of the Sultan Jalal al-Din Mankburna, then there was an ordinary robbery, which the Kurds hunted on the mountain paths.

    It happened near the village of Ain Dara, the territory of modern Syria, where Kurds still live today, and this area is unofficially called "Syrian Kurdistan".
    This ingenious commander died so ingloriously, who, under other circumstances, might have stopped Genghis Khan and founded his empire, similar to the state of Timur, radically changing the course of history of all mankind.
    It is worth noting that after the death of Jalal al-Din, rumors immediately began to circulate that he had not died and that his silahdar (squire) had been killed, and the Khorezmshah himself had disappeared, dressed in Sufi clothes.
    In 1235 a rebellion was raised in Mazenderan, the leader of which declared himself Jalal ad-Din, i.e. there is a classic impostor.
    Suppressed the uprising in 1236, the leader was executed.
  15. +5
    5 November 2019 13: 26
    Ryzhov recklessly uses illustrations, both modern reconstructions of the Mongols, and illustrations from the manuscripts of Jalal ad Din. But did the propagandist historian Ryzhov ask himself where did these manuscripts come from with illustrations?
    I give an excerpt from an article by Mirgaliyev I.M.

    This is really an oxymoron, even squared. Someone Bar2, a noteworthy and consistent opponent of the existence of the Mongols in their classical understanding and proving to everyone that the Mongols are Mungals - Gauls - Russians, attracts Mirgaliev, head of the Center for Research of the Golden Horde and Tatar Khanates named after Ryzhov, to fight against the "propagandist historian" ... M.A. Usmanov, the conductor of the idea of ​​the Golden Horde roots of Russian statehood, formed from the Golden Horde ulus, in which the Russian princes did not have any independence.
    1. 0
      5 November 2019 14: 41
      Quote: Undecim
      This is really an oxymoron

      I also looked at who this Mirgaleev was, and although I did not have time to get to such a generalization, the first impression was exactly the way you wrote it. I saw only a list of his works, mainly from the XIV century, the article referred to by Bar 2 did not find (there was no time to search in detail), although I suspect that in it one can "learn" a lot of "interesting", in particular, from which context pulled out quote. Did you find this article for an hour? In order not to look for me, otherwise something has shaved me ... smile
      1. +4
        5 November 2019 18: 51
        Good evening, Michael. The link to the article is in the commentary of Bar. The article is not sensational. Mirgaliyev describes the process of research and translation into Russian of the manuscript of “Shuab-i Panjgan” by Rashid al-Din, a copy of which he managed to get in the archive of the Topkapi Palace Museum in Istanbul.
        The author’s disagreements as to whether the indicated work contained illustrations with the historian Grigoryev are also stated.
        This article has nothing to do with illustrations from JĀME 'AL-TAWĀRIḴ, and Bar 2's generalizations about the fact that if one of the works of any author is not illustrated, then there are no illustrations and his other works are not worth a damn.
        1. 0
          5 November 2019 19: 15
          Good evening.
          The link didn’t work for me, I searched in the text. But thank you all the same.
          By the way, about Jami at-tavarih. I looked for information about the illustrations and almost immediately, at the request "Tabriz school of miniatures" I got literally the following (site https://dic.academic.ru)
          The Persian miniatures of the manuscripts for Jami at-tavarih [8] [9], used by Rashid al-Din in the workshops of the Tabriz library, give an idea of ​​the painting of the early 14th century. 1306 dates back to the year one of the lists stored at the University of Edinburgh, the other, dated 1314 year, belongs to the Asian Society in London.

          Further there is still:
          The manuscript "Jami at-tavarih" 1410 — 1415 years
          This manuscript comes from Ardabil and is now kept in the Paris National Library. It may have been performed in Tabriz. According to Brittany and Weymarn, “the style of miniatures is primitive. Uncomplicated symmetrical compositions are populated with rudely executed static figures of people, more dynamics in the images of animals; the landscape (glades, rocks) is rendered conditionally, flatly. "

          Honestly, I don’t know why I should doubt that these miniatures in the manuscript took place. request
  16. +7
    5 November 2019 14: 35
    Dear author, I saw your article and remembered the case.
    As part of the military commission of the USSR Ministry of Defense, I arrived in Ulan Bator. It was 1982. At the end of the day, a representative of the General Staff of the Mongolian Army suggested we go to the Regional Museum. Come on. No visitors. They began to climb the second floor and I saw a portrait of Genghis Khan. I asked my colleague to photograph the picture. But the representative of the General Staff asked not to take pictures. Against the backdrop of Genghis Khan, it was forbidden to take pictures.
    Another interesting fact in the diet of Mongolian fighters at that time was 700 grams of meat per day. That's how they fed in the army of Mongolia. .
  17. The comment was deleted.
  18. +2
    5 November 2019 15: 19
    Quote: Trilobite Master
    Those who don't trust the wiki can check the information. But, "most likely" (), in this case it is.


    not far you climbed to refute, then that floated above, then dragged.

    For a hundred and too many years in Russia and abroad, only publications of certain parts of the grandiose work of Rashid al-Din were undertaken: in 1836, the Frenchman Katrmer (“The History of Hulagu Khan”, Persian text, French translation, extensive philological and terminological commentary, together with a sketch of the biography of Rashid-ad-din as an introduction), 3 [3] in 1858-1888. - Russian orientalist I.N. Berezina (“History of the Mongols” and “History of Genghis Khan”, Persian text, Russian translation and notes), 4 [4] in 1911 - Frenchman E. Bloche

    .

    Academician I.P. Petrushevsky writes

    (“The story of the successors of Genghis Khan in Mongolia and China,” Persian text with notes, now very outdated). 1 [5] Even earlier, in 1905, the English Orientalist E.G. Brown declared his intention to publish the full edition of Jami 'at-tavarikh, not only I part of this work (Tarih-i Gazani), but also never before published even in extracts and not involved in scientific development II part of "Jami 'at-tavarikh" (general history). 2 [6]



    This promise was never fulfilled by E.G. Brown, just as it remained unfulfilled, and another obligation undertaken by him 3 [7] - to publish the correspondence of Rashid al-Din (“Mukatabat-i Rashidi”), 4 [8] of outstanding interest to researchers of socio-economic history Iran, partly of neighboring countries, and containing data on the political ideas of Rashid al-Din and his feudal economy. 5 [9]



    The difficult and responsible task of preparing for publication of the full publication of “Tarih-i Gazani” was first performed by Soviet orientalists
    .


    this is all about the heritage of Rashid ad Din, but he does not mention the manuscript in Istanbul to which Mirgaleev I.M.
    And what’s most interesting is that in the preface to the publication of the translation of Rashchid ad Din 1952 the academician also does not mention illustrations, does not mention illustrations and the publishing commission of the Soviet translation of Rashid ad Din.

    http://libarch.nmu.org.ua/handle/GenofondUA/52889

    so where did these illustrations come from?
    1. -2
      5 November 2019 18: 07
      Quote: Bar2
      so where did these illustrations come from?

      Well, where did they come from? Already looking forward to revelation ... laughing
  19. +2
    5 November 2019 15: 25
    Quote: Undecim
    This is really an oxymoron, even squared. Someone Bar2, a written and consistent opponent of the existence of the Mongols in their classical sense and proving to everyone that the Mongols are Mungals - Gauls - Russians


    [Quote] several quotes from the book “Scythian history” by the Russian historian of the XNUMXth century Andrei Lyzlov: “But from five hundred years (X - XI century, ed.) and more, the Scythian people always left the country spoken by their language Mongal, and it was called by the inhabitants Mongolians or Mongailians, after some state, as it will be lower, having changed their name, named the Tartarus, from the Tartar River or from many of their peoples, the hedgehogs themselves are more kindly accepted or heard.

    ... the smaller half of Scythia, even above the Assy Sea, is called the great Tartaria. The great Tartaria is divided from Scythia by Imaus into a great and famous mountain: a hedgehog from one country is Tartaria, and a hedgehog from a sowing country is Scythia. Idezha finds a stone mountain named Kazakaz, named near the sea of ​​Hvalisskago. From another country, from noon and east, their great mountain is separated, spoken bykova, in Latin - Mons Taurus, on it the first was the ark of Noah by the flood.

    These all Scythian peoples are secretly unknown and unknown to Greek and Latin. The Scythian borders to the west are from the Don River (and Boter, a descriptor of the whole world, believes from the Volga to have a decent hedgehog). To the east of the sun to the limits of Chia, like India. From noon from the sea of ​​Meotskago, that is, Azov, and Caspian, that is, Khvalisskogo. At midnight, even to the ocean of the Scythian Ledovatago. It is divided into four parts. One Horde has everything in it. The second is hidden and all nations, the same essence under Usson and the Lope desert. The third will enclose China, and the hedgehog is found in the aforementioned desert, and the Khin state. The fourth contains countries little known to us, like Belgian, Argon, Arsater, Ania.

    From these, the Tatars of the Mongols have come to know these Tatars, the same are the aliens to us, the Savromats, the aliens, we also call them Crimean, Monkonskiy, Perekopskiy, Belgorod, Ochakov and all those peoples, who also live near Lake Paliusmeotis, that is, the Sea of ​​Azov. ”
    [/ Quote]

    Well, as you can see, not only me, but also the historian Lyzlov also mentions the Mongils, who are Scythians and who they are Tartars.
  20. -1
    5 November 2019 18: 58
    Quote: Trilobite Master
    Well, where did they come from? Already looking forward to revelation


    you don’t ask me, but Ryzhov in his articles he made extensive references to these miniatures.
    1. -1
      5 November 2019 19: 19
      Quote: Bar2
      you don't ask me

      And who else? Who is the light of historical science? wassat laughing
      I ask you because everyone else believes that these illustrations were there and only you think that they were not. So answer - where did they come from?
  21. 0
    5 November 2019 19: 55
    Okay. But the best phrase is "a tent without ropes."
    1. -1
      5 November 2019 21: 58
      Yes, the author burns, sometimes she’s so copy-paste ... Comrade Jalal-ed-din, the Georgians, still enjoys special respect for the freedom fighter.
  22. -2
    5 November 2019 22: 08
    The article is worthless. It is not clear who fought with Chigis, and for what purposes. It is clear that the Mongols did not have serious resistance from the opponents. Except for a few morons, who did not get a chance, because they were very "loved" by the local dekhans. I wonder who supported Jalal - Ed-Dina-Turkmens? Then his maneuvers between India and the Transcaucasus are understandable. It is interesting how the robber and murderer Jalal-ed-Din got along with the Ismailis-Alamut in western Iran, thanks to the Mongols they rid the world of all evil spirits ...
  23. +1
    5 November 2019 22: 28
    I wonder why precisely the confrontation between Genghis Khan and Khorezm is close to us? Because of Jan’s books, from childhood? But the choice of time periods of the trilogy is also not accidental.

    A kind of forerunner of what happened with the Russian principalities. But trips to China are not so vividly perceived.
    1. 0
      6 November 2019 12: 57
      Quote from Korsar4
      I wonder why precisely the confrontation between Genghis Khan and Khorezm is close to us?

      Well, when Putin was told about the Turkmens in Syria, he told us on the air that before that he knew only about our Turkmens :)
  24. 0
    6 November 2019 09: 21
    Quote: Trilobite Master
    Honestly, I don’t know why I should doubt that these miniatures in the manuscript took place.

    probably because academician Petrushevsky in the introduction to the Soviet translation and a group of scientists in the publication commission also did not mention some miniatures. They published, as they themselves wrote the most complete edition of the Collection of Chronicles, and they also forgot about illustrations, many scientists took and missed the academicians all the pictures that Rashid ad Din with friends in the 14th century painstakingly painted, how can this be? Mirgaleev, also a scientist is not the last person in science, was engaged in primary sources in Istanbul and also did not see any pictures.
    Now, what kind of science is it for someone who sees, someone not?
    How can one agree on something in this science of history, even if the work of one author has such differences?
  25. 0
    6 November 2019 09: 28
    Quote: Undecim
    This article has nothing to do with illustrations from JĀME 'AL-TAWĀRIḴ, and Bar 2's generalizations about the fact that if one of the works of any author is not illustrated, then there are no illustrations and his other works are not worth a damn.


    the fact that in this science-history to the real works of a medieval author suddenly appeared from nowhere "works" with additional information that are for some reason not in Persia / Iran, in the author's homeland, and in England and France says only one thing, that in this your In science-history, arbitrariness is happening-manuscripts appear from nowhere and disappear into nowhere and this happens for ideological reasons.
  26. +1
    6 November 2019 13: 18
    Again the Mongols. And no one is embarrassed that Mongolia could neither collect, nor equip, nor feed an army capable of conquering half the world. Nobody bothers that there could be no empire without writing. That there are no Mongolian coins. That in Mongolia itself they did not find anything confirming the robbery of half of Eurasia. That in Mongolian folklore there are not even phantom memories of great conquests. And that, finally, in the Mongolian language there is not and there was neither the name Chingiz, nor the title "khan".
  27. +2
    6 November 2019 14: 16
    Quote: Laurel
    Again the Mongols. And it doesn’t bother anyone that Mongolia could neither collect nor


    you want too much, if you pull out the history with the Mongols from the world, then all this world history will inevitably fall inevitably, therefore, these sites exist and these endless articles about the Mongols, because a new generation is growing up, which must certainly believe in the infallibility of the already built historical building.
    Therefore, all this talk about the Mongols will be eternal, until the minus changes to plus.
  28. 0
    8 November 2019 13: 28
    Thank you so much for the article! Khorezmians still do not consider themselves Uzbek, despite the fact that they are part of Uzbekistan.