We recall the infantry and the native company

50
The expression is widely known: “Until a foot of an infantryman sets foot on the ground during the battle, this territory is not considered conquered or liberated from the enemy.” And the most accurate and winged name for the infantry, this main and heroic military branch, is “Queen of the Fields!” - allegedly almost personally Stalin himself gave in his speech delivered on May 5, 1941 at a banquet in the Kremlin in honor of graduates of military academies, it was then, according to the recollections of many people present there, the leader proclaimed a toast with the words: “In all wars the main force that ensured the victory was the infantry. Artillery, aviation, armored forces defended the infantry, ensured the fulfillment of the tasks assigned to the infantry. The fortresses, cities and towns of the enemy were considered occupied only when the foot of the infantry entered. It always has been, it will be so in a future war. The first toast I propose to the infantry. For the queen of the fields - infantry! "(I.V. Stalin).

We recall the infantry and the native company
Soviet troops begin to attack under fire from the enemy


It was as if Stalin had a premonition that our army and its main branch of arms had been waiting for only a month and a half, but a fierce battle with the enemy was waiting for death and death.

The main infantry unit in the Red Army before the Second World War was the rifle division, by June the 1941 of the Red Army had 198 rifle, motorized and mountain rifle divisions. Of these, 103 divisions, that is, almost more than 73% of the total, were deployed on the western borders of the USSR on the eve of the war.

In accordance with 5 1941 / 4 approved by 100 on April, the rifle division of the main structure included 3 rifle regiments and, in contrast to infantry divisions of the armies of other countries of the world, had in its composition not one, but two whole artillery regiments and each rifle regiment, in addition to the three rifle battalions, also included an additional battery of regimental guns of 76,2-mm caliber, as well as a battery of 45-mm anti-tank guns and a battery of 120-mm mortars. The rifle battalion also had its own artillery; it was a platoon of 45-mm anti-tank guns and a company of 82-mm mortars. And even each of the division's 27 rifle companies also had its own artillery support, it had two 50-mm mortars. Thus, in the rifle division it was supposed to have 210 guns and mortars (excluding 50-mm mortars), which made it possible to classify it as a rifle artillery compound.

Prior to the mass deployment of mechanized corps in 1940, many rifle divisions of the Red Army had tank a battalion consisting of two or three companies of light tanks (up to 54 vehicles). And taking into account the presence of a car battalion in the division (more than 400 cars, in wartime - 558), the division commander had the opportunity, if necessary, to form a powerful mobile unit as part of the reconnaissance and tank battalions and a rifle regiment on artillery trucks.

Soviet infantry, supported by ACS SU-76, is attacking German positions in the Königsberg area


It was all conceived, seemingly, competently and intelligently, but by the beginning of World War II the tank battalions of rifle divisions had been withdrawn, and they remained only in three rifle divisions of the Trans-Baikal Military District. So in June 1941g. each of the motorized rifle divisions of the Red Army had or, more correctly, should have had a regular number of 12 thousand people, and an ordinary rifle about 14,5 thousand people fighters.

And since it was impossible to maintain all rifle divisions in the main staff number 4 / 100 for economic reasons, part of the divisions were formed in a reduced composition according to staff number 4 / 120, according to which only 27 was deployed from 9 rifle companies, and the rest were cropped (abbreviated). The division of such a composition in total in those pre-war years was about 5864 man, yes, it contained almost everything provided for by the wartime state. weapon and military equipment, however, all this division was to receive only during mobilization, only after the division commander received orders to open a special package after orders from the district headquarters, only then did the division have to accept 6000 reservists and get the 2000 horses missing to the state of wartime and around 400 cars.

From various sources, including memoirs and other literature, it is known that the average staffing of the infantry divisions of the Red Army on June 22 1941. It was: in Leningrad IN - 11 985 people, in the Baltic Special IN - 8712, in the Western Special IN - 9327, in Kiev Special IN - 8792, in Odessa IN - 8400 people.

Soviet soldiers are attacking the enemy under the cover of Maxim machine gun.


Thus, all these cadres of divisions located in western districts did not have time to mobilize in wartime states, many enemy warehouses with equipment, armament, ammunition and military equipment were captured in the first days of the war, and all these rifle battles divisions with a little more than two regiments each, but on the staff cards they were all marked as full-blooded, and these divisions carried out combat missions as having almost 14 thousand soldiers in their composition.

The Wehrmacht infantry divisions at the time of the attack on the USSR, in contrast to the Red Army SD, were mobilized in full capacity and consisted of almost 16 thousand soldiers, by the end of the war the Germans brought the number of their infantry divisions to almost 18 thousand people, thus Two or even three divisions of the Red Army fought, as a rule, against a single German infantry division.

However, if in the period from 1941 to 42, the German infantry division still surpassed the Soviet rifle division, for example, by the total number of submachine guns and machine guns threefold, and by mortars almost twice as much as personnel, then by the beginning of 1,55, this number was about equal. And at the beginning of 1943, the usual Soviet rifle division was already approximately twice as large as the German infantry in both pistols, machine guns, and mortars, with almost equal numbers of personnel in the Red Army rifle divisions by the end of the war more and more motorized, they were transplanted to imported cars, and the German Wehrmacht, on the contrary, transplanted their soldiers with their cars with cars.

Soviet soldiers in a trench during the defense of Leningrad


The first months of the war showed that most of the commanders of the Red Army middle and junior link had a bad idea of ​​how to properly organize a general combat, manage their units, and organize the interaction between different branches of the military. Most interesting, according to the recollections of many front-line soldiers, those who survived the bloody summer of 41, our infantry soldier from the regular army staff was quite well prepared individually, even Germans recognized this, but the commanders, alas, at the initial stage of the war completely ceded the battlefield to the enemy , confusion, confusion and incompetence of command reigned everywhere.

The Germans, on the contrary, acted prudently, competently, their combined-arms commanders constantly displayed a reasonable initiative and fiction in battle, they especially worked out the interaction between ground forces and aviation, the Yu-87 attack aircraft constantly hung in the air, the slightest hitch of the German infantry on the ground - and at the request of a tank or infantry commander, attack aircraft with a howl rushed to the aid of their sponsored troops.

Our infantrymen had only one thing to do, it was to dig in the ground and hold on, oh, how difficult it was to hold when enemy's planes shot with impunity everyone, even single fighters, when the enemy constantly tries to get around you, when you feel insecure in your young company commander, who only he came to the regiment after accelerated graduation from the school and did not command a platoon, but received a company immediately after the killed captain, and immediately - into battle. It was not easy for the commanders of the Red Army in the summer of 41 of the year, for most of them the high command completely constrained the initiative, they simply took the right to maneuver. “Stand to the death!” And without order not to retreat, was the main order of 1941 of the year.

Soldiers of the Soviet 115 Infantry Division A. Konkov in a trench on Nevskaya Dubrovka. In the foreground machine-gunner V. Pavlov with a machine gun DP-27


Service was at the infantry soldier, he lived in the war literally from several hours to several years, as someone lucky, someone died during the first bombing, and someone was more fortunate and managed to walk from Brest to Moscow and back from Moscow to Brest, and further to Berlin, Prague or Koenigsberg. An infantry soldier lived mostly in the open air, although if the regiment was on the defensive, then for weeks or even months the dugout became the infantry's home, and who was lucky to be with the commander, then the dugout, and so, usually between battles on the march, the fighters walked right through the fields, forests and marshes, through the impassable mud, sometimes the infantry soldier even had to take food on the go. It used to be a landing force on armor, in this case the speed of infantry movement increased dramatically, but that was later, when the Red Army moved forward, to the West.

Many fighters walked thousands of kilometers along with their personal belongings, so, for example, the weight of a combat display of a rifle platoon soldier along with equipment, personal weapons, ammunition and food "NZ" often amounted almost to 30 kg, the infantryman always bore himself a large supply of ammunition, if it was armed with a rifle, then usually the cartridges were packed in two-piece pouches of leather or kersey with a fastener on 6 rifle clips, there were also pouches of a pre-revolutionary sample - leather, with a hinged lid and side They were placed, as a rule, on both sides of the belt buckle, those fighters who were armed with machine guns, wore ammunition in special pouches, also placed on the belt, the infantryman with a light machine gun carried curb shops on the belt through Many veterans recalled that each shoulder tried to collect as much ammunition as possible before the fight, they were filled with gas bags, duffel bags, pockets, etc. It was heavier than all those in the infantry who were armed with heavy weapons, for example, calculation of st The machine gun of the ankovy machine carried almost 60 kg of iron on itself, those who were “lucky” to be at Maxim, plus boxes with curved ribbons, Degtyarev was lighter, somewhere under 40 kg, the soldiers also carried their 82-mm battalion mortars on their hands.

Soviet soldiers in the trenches with shields against bullets and shrapnel


By the beginning of the Great Patriotic War, the RKKA small arms system generally met the conditions of that time and consisted of the following types of weapons: personal (pistol and revolver), individual rifle and cavalry units (magazine rifle and carbine, self-loading and automatic rifles), sniper weapons ( shop and self-loading sniper rifles), individual weapon of machine gunners (submachine gun), collective weapon of rifle and cavalry branches and platoons (light machine gun), pu Lemet divisions (heavy machine guns), antiaircraft small arms (quad machine gun installations and large-caliber machine guns), small arms tanks (tank machine gun). In addition, armed with hand grenades and rifle grenade launchers.

The most important thing in a field battle for an infantryman is to quickly and correctly take up a position and dig in, all this was done under enemy fire. For this, the soldier always had a small 50 long-sized infantry shovel stuck on his belt, it was not only the infantryman’s own engineering armament, but also his terrible weapon in hand-to-hand combat, his last argument, was used by the shoulder blades in hand-to-hand combat not only Russians, but also Germans, many probably read from Remarque "on the Western front without change", which tells how German soldiers were fired from a Frenchman E trench in bouts of World namely infantry shovels.

Another attribute of the Soviet infantry soldier, about which it should not be forgotten, is his dense overcoat, which protected him from small fragments, and while lying down he often served as a parapet, rescued at the crossing, and during the halt she could be put under her head, and the head of the fighter, as a rule, was defended by a steel helmet of the US-40, there was also one more sample of the Soviet helmet - this was the US-36 (steel helmet of the 1936 model of the year).

The defeats of the initial period of the war showed that a revision of the entire system of training of the Soviet infantry, in particular its tactics, is required.
Already at the end of 1941, the People's Commissar of Defense ordered the leaders of the “Shot” courses to prepare 1 000 commanders of infantry battalions who knew the tactics of modern combat, knew how to lead the battalion in battle and owned all the battalion’s regular weapons. This release took place in February 1942. The Soviet infantry had to learn or retrain literally on the fly, so, for example, in view of the combat experience of the first months of the war, the tactics of the infantry battle itself had to abandon the division of battle formation into a “chilling” and “strike” group; units and its weapons, and the stability of the defense gave the fire of all fire weapons. In addition, for the commander simplified control of maneuver and fire. The basis of the combat order in the attack again became the chain, to suppress the enemy used fire on the move with a rough aiming at objects or lines. Much in military science was learned from the Germans, in particular the ability to interact with tanks and attack aircraft, so the Soviet infantry, attacking in close cooperation with tanks and self-propelled guns, often began to move on the battlefield on their armor. Since 1942, in the assault of fortifications and in urban battles, assault groups and detachments were widely used, in which arrows, machine gunners, machine gunners, armor-piercers, sappers, chemists (with flamethrowers and smoke tools), calculations of mortars and anti-tank guns worked together.

The advanced units of the 285 Infantry Regiment of the 183 Infantry Division are fighting with the enemy in the captured German trenches. In the foreground is the body of a murdered German soldier. Battle of Kursk, 10 July 1943 of the year.


As the battle became more mobile, more mobility was expected from the infantry. It is not by chance that from the beginning of 1942, demands have been put forward to facilitate various images of small arms.

During the war, both the Soviet and German armies gradually shifted to the trench defense system, to the creation of strong strongholds and the adaptation of populated areas to all-round defense. Moreover, the main task in such a defense system was to ensure the multi-layered fire and fast maneuvering by fire weapons.

1942 of the Year (BUP-42), which embodied the experience of the war, read: "Fire, maneuver and hand-to-hand combat are the main methods of infantry action." The firearm superiority of the infantry was achieved primarily by increasing the density of rifle and machine-gun fire and fire So, before the war in the Red Army, the density of the 5 bullets per minute on the 1 was considered the required front meter, but at the beginning of the war in July 1941, when the defense had to be conducted on a wide front, the average density of fire did not exceed 2,5 bullets on the 1 meter, however, by December 1942, it had grown to 3,9 bullets, and only in December did 1944 succeed in finally exceeding the pre-war demand and bringing the density of small arms to the 7,6 bullet per meter. it was possible to maneuver fire weapons and to achieve high densities of small fire, for example, in the defensive operation near Kursk in the summer of 1943, the density of fire in some areas reached 8-10 bullets on the 1 running meter of the front.

Soviet soldiers in the trenches in the Kharkiv region in anticipation of an enemy attack. Voronezh Front. In February-March 1943, the troops of the Voronezh Front successfully conducted the Kharkov offensive operation 1943, during which they liberated Kursk, Kharkov, Lviv. March 16 (according to other data, March 14) front troops left Kharkov (Kharkov defensive operation 1943) and, moving to the line east of Sumy, north of Belgorod, along the Seversky Donets river to Chuguev, German troops stopped.

Which is typical, in the German memoirs, a rather high assessment is given of the training of the Soviet infantry, especially its defense activities, while in the 41-42 period. its offensive capabilities, on the contrary, are rated very low, and this is understandable - all offensive operations of that period ended sadly for the Red Army, but our infantrymen defended, on the contrary, very steadfastly even in the most hopeless situation. This is what the German general Kurt Tippelskirkhir wrote in his memoirs about our soldier: “Russians kept with unexpected firmness and perseverance even when they were bypassed and surrounded. By doing so, they were gaining time and making more and more new reserves for counterattacks from the depths of the country, which, moreover, were stronger than it was supposed ... the enemy showed an absolutely incredible ability to resist. "

It was thanks to the courage and perseverance on the battlefields that the Soviet infantry soldier managed to overcome in the fiercest battles of one of the strongest opponents of the time, the infantry of the German Wehrmacht.
50 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Indigo
    +16
    13 July 2012 08: 35
    We plowed half of Europe in Plastunsky ...
    That's who really bore the brunt of the war on his shoulders ... and how to be stylish, what would it drag on his hump .. A low bow to you, Queen of the Fields!
  2. +7
    13 July 2012 09: 28
    for example, in a defensive operation near Kursk in the summer of 1943, the density of fire in some areas reached 8-10 bullets per 1 linear meter of front

    well, all the same what kind of firmness of spirit had to be in order to continue to fulfill the task, and not to squeeze into a lump at the bottom of the trench in such conditions. After all, the density of fire was so great for a reason, the Germans responded, too, be healthy ...

    Thanks to our old people
  3. +6
    13 July 2012 09: 40
    Great article. Objectively and correctly indicated the shortcomings and absolutely all the advantages of infantry units. The need for constant interaction with other parts and compounds is indicated. Excellent evidence that all other types and types of troops are served precisely by rifle units.
    At the present stage, taking into account communication systems, intelligence, etc. the role of the commander of the rifle division, as a coordinator of the actions of not only the infantry itself, but also of the attached units, is growing even more.
  4. +5
    13 July 2012 10: 26
    Hold on, infantry!
  5. Tanks
    +5
    13 July 2012 10: 43
    Thanks to the Heroes !! All those who fought - THANKS !!
  6. wk
    +5
    13 July 2012 10: 56
    //// offensive operation of 1943, during which Kursk, Kharkov, Lviv were liberated ./////
    instead of (Lviv) probably (Lgov)
  7. +4
    13 July 2012 11: 59
    Russian infantry has always been particularly resistant.
  8. +3
    13 July 2012 13: 49
    Combat experience is precious, this is clearly reflected in this article.
  9. +5
    13 July 2012 15: 00
    In my opinion, Frederick 2 said: give me Russian soldiers and I will conquer the whole world.

    GLORY TO THE RUSSIAN SOLDIER !!!!
  10. 8 company
    -17
    13 July 2012 15: 49
    Did Stalin drink to the infantry? What a fine fellow, like "caring"! Before the war he shot several hundred commanders who were supposed to lead the infantry into battle, and after that he raises a toast to her. A hypocritical ghoul.
    1. Svyatoslav
      +6
      13 July 2012 16: 28
      It’s not for you to judge Stalin. Not one other ruler of Russia (empire, USSR or modern Russia) did not drink a single toast to the Russian people. That should be talking about something.
      1. 8 company
        -16
        13 July 2012 16: 34
        Quote: Svyatoslav
        That should be talking about something.


        It is let the fans of Stalin love him because he drank for both of these, and I assess according to deeds, and things were awful: defeat after defeat, huge losses, the Germans in Leningrad, Moscow, Stalingrad, Maykop. However, I forgot, for the fans of Stalin, the price of Victory is not important. And by the way, I am an infantryman, and I know the price of an experienced commander, so I have the right to despise this half-educated seminarian with a pronounced delusion of persecution for what he did with the Red Army command before the war.
        1. +5
          13 July 2012 16: 46
          A strange position, about some fans you have not forgotten, but about a simple Soviet soldier-infantryman did not even remember how they say the memory of those thanks to whom we live is still alive, that means they continue to live, that's what I mean, not about who and for whom drank .................
    2. +2
      13 July 2012 17: 06
      Quote: Company 8
      Did Stalin drink to the infantry? What a fine fellow, like "caring"!

      Who about what, and bald about a scallop.
    3. Alf
      +3
      13 July 2012 23: 05
      He shot people of the civil war who did not even have a military education, and in return he put at the helm of the Red Army really talented commanders - Rokosovsky, Malinovsky, Chernyakhovsky and others. In addition, very many were released before the war, in 40-41 and removed the criminal record. Many accusers of Stalin do not want to remember this fact.
      1. 8 company
        -5
        14 July 2012 00: 34
        Quote: Alf
        very many released and removed criminal record


        Be so kind as to provide a list of these "many". I think everyone will be interested.
      2. Alf
        0
        14 July 2012 17: 25
        Roman Pykhalov "The Great Blundered War". Clearly, briefly, without water, a lot of numbers.
        1. 8 company
          +1
          14 July 2012 23: 48
          Quote: Alf
          Roman Pykhalov "The Great Blundered War". Clearly, briefly, without water, a lot of numbers.


          And what prevents you from citing at least 10 names of the Red Army commanders dismissed from the NKVD out of all of whom, in your words, there are "a lot"?
          1. Alf
            0
            15 July 2012 22: 33
            If you REALLY want to know what does not fit into YOUR system, it is easier to take this book and read it.
            1. 8 company
              0
              16 July 2012 10: 56
              Quote: Alf
              it's easier to take this book and read.


              Followed your advice. So, we take the category of commanders of the Red Army brigade commander - Marshal. Pykhalov has approximately 15 military leaders who have been released from prison, we will even round up to 20. On the website of the rkka.ru section in the Encyclopedia there is a list of all those executed, who died in the camps, who were killed in interrogations and committed suicide by the Red Army commanders, with biographies. There are more than 550 there. Let 550. We consider: 550 + 20 = 570 570: 100 = 5,7 20: 5,7 = 3,5%

              So, with your help, we have proved that the share of military leaders released before the war was 3,5%. Do you think this is "a lot"? Well, it's your business.
  11. 8 company
    -13
    13 July 2012 16: 52
    Quote: byrnas
    but they didn’t even remember about a simple Soviet soldier-infantryman


    That is, when I write about the huge losses of the beginning of the war, I write about whom, in your opinion? Your version is just interesting. The Stalinists always have interesting versions and interpretations of history. Maybe, surrounded by Stalin, the losses were huge? It seems that everyone survived: the Kaganovichs, Mehlis, Voroshilovs, Molotovs - all in openwork and were not even injured.
    1. +6
      13 July 2012 19: 08
      The resulting losses at the front are practically 1: 1, if ours belonged to German prisoners of war, as they were to Soviet prisoners, and, having come to Germany, would avenge the burnt villages and children in the wells, according to the principle that the Germans behaved in the occupied territories , then the loss of the Germans in the war could easily be brought up to 45 millions (they deserved it!) or even completely cut out ...
      And there is no need to distort: ​​surrounded by Hitler, neither Goering, nor Bormann, nor Goebbels died at the front, they were poisoned like rats when the "Arctic fox" came, and our front commanders died, and not only in 1941, like Kirponos, but and in 1944 - Vatutin, and in 1945 - Chernyakhovsky, and they were already advancing !!! In 1941, the Germans did not die during the offensive! So to squeal that Stalin is to blame for everything - sorry, already a bad liberistic tone! "Genius" Tukhachevsky, who profiled the war to the Poles in 1920, and armed the Red Army with thousands (!!!) of light tanks of the T-26 and BT type, pierced even by large-caliber machine guns, now give rise to traitors like V. Suvorov (Rezun) and such here are the "anti-Stalinists" shouting that they have profiled everything, having thousands of tanks, the Germans have been drenched in blood, and so on. etc. And the famous T-34 and KV were put into service after Tukhachevsky ...
    2. +3
      13 July 2012 21: 26
      Quote: Company 8
      Maybe, surrounded by Stalin, the losses were huge? It seems that everyone survived: the Kaganovichs, Mehlis, Voroshilovs, Molotovs - all in openwork and were not even injured.

      Timur Frunze died, Yakov Dzhugashvili died, Khrushchev's son, a pilot (like Timur Frunze), died ... But the children of our "leaders" did not even serve in the army.
  12. pavelk
    +5
    13 July 2012 17: 00
    "reserves, moreover, were stronger than anticipated"

    - No, General Kurt Tippelskirch, you just were initially weaker /
  13. +2
    13 July 2012 17: 00
    Quote: Company 8
    Maybe, surrounded by Stalin, the losses were huge? It seems that everyone survived: the Kaganovichs, Mehlis, Voroshilovs, Molotovs - all in openwork and were not even injured.

    Then remember about the dead, crippled and just fought children of the party’s top. That not one modern major in the army does not serve.
  14. 8 company
    -10
    13 July 2012 17: 12
    For modern Stalinists, a list of those who could not fight the Germans thanks to the policy of your idol is remembered. Rejoice, you love to discuss with foam at the mouth how you would organize a sweep of society from "enemies of the people" today. I cannot accommodate the division commanders and brigades who were shot before the war, there are hundreds of them.

    COMOR
    1. Alafuzo Mikhail Ivanovich. Rod. 1891. Shot on 13.07.1937/XNUMX/XNUMX.
    2. Apoga Ernest Fritsevich (Frantsevich) Rod. 1898. Shot on 28.11.1937/XNUMX/XNUMX.
    3. Bazilevich George Dmitrievich. Rod.26.01.1889. Shot March 3.03.1939, XNUMX.
    4. Batorsky Mikhail Alexandrovich. Rod. 1890. Shot February 8.02.1938, XNUMX.
    5. Cooper George Iosifovich. Rod. 1893. Shot March 10.03.1939, XNUMX.
    6. Bryansky Peter Alekseevich. Rod. 1896. Shot on 29.08.1938/XNUMX/XNUMX.
    7. Weiner Leonid Yakovlevich. Rod. 1897. Shot November 26.11.1937, XNUMX
    8. Vasilenko Matvey Ivanovich. Rod. 1888. Shot on 1.07.1937/XNUMX/XNUMX.
    9. Voskanov Gaspar Karpovich. Rod. 1887. Shot on September 20.09.1937, XNUMX.
    10. Guy Gaya Dmitrievich (Bzhishkyants). Born. 1887. Shot on December 11.12.1937, XNUMX.
    11. Gailit (Gailitis) Yan Petrovich. Rod. 1894. Shot 1.08.1938.
    12. Garkavy Ilya Ivanovich. Rod. 1888. Shot 01.07.1937/XNUMX/XNUMX
    13. Hecker Anatoly Ilyich. Rod. 1888. Shot 1.07.1937
    14. Germanovich Markiyan Yakovlevich. Rod. 29.10.1895. Shot on September 20.09.1937, XNUMX.
    15. Gittis Vladimir Mikhailovich. Rod. 24.06.1881. Shot on 22.08.1938/XNUMX/XNUMX.
    16. Gorbachev Boris Sergeevich. Rod. 07.08.1892. Shot on July 3.07.1937, XNUMX.
    17. Goryachev Elisey Ivanovich. Rod. 1892. He committed suicide in December 1938.
    18. Gribov Sergey Efimovich. Rod. 1895. Shot in July 1938.
    19. Gryaznov Ivan Kensorinovich. Rod. 1897. Shot on 29.07.1938/XNUMX/XNUMX.
    20. Efimov Nikolay Alekseevich. Rod. 1897. Shot on 14.08.1937/XNUMX/XNUMX.
    21. Zonberg Jean Fritsevich. Rod. 1891. Shot on 1.09.1938.
    22. Ingaunis Felix Antonovich. Rod. 1894. Shot on July 28.07.1938, XNUMX.
    23. Kalmykov Mikhail Vasilievich. Rod 888. Shot in April 1938.
    24. Kovtyukh Epifan Iovich. Rod. 09.05.1890. Shot on 29.07.1938/XNUMX/XNUMX.
    25. Kosogov Ivan Dmitrievich. Rod. 1891. Shot 1.08.1938.
    26. Krivoruchko Nikolay Nikolaevich. Rod. 1887. Shot on 19.08.1938.
    27. Kuybyshev Nikolay Vladimirovich. Rod. 1893. Shot 1.08.1938.
    28. Kutyakov Ivan Semenovich. Rod. 1897. Shot on 28.07.1938/XNUMX/XNUMX
    29. Lavrov Vasily Konstantinovich. Rod. 1898. Shot on 29.07.1938/XNUMX/XNUMX.
    31. Levichev Vasily Nikolaevich. Gender 1891. Shot in 1937.
    32. Lepin Eduard Davidovich. Rod.1889, executed on 22.08.1938/XNUMX/XNUMX.
    33. Mager Maxim Petrovich. Rod. 1897. Shot in July 1941.
    34. Mezheninov Sergey Alexandrovich. Rod. 1890. Shot on September 28.09.1937, XNUMX.
    35. Mulin Valentin Mikhailovich. Gender 1897. Shot in June 1938.
    36. Neyman Konstantin Augustovich. Rod. 1897. Shot in November 1937.
    37. Petin Nikolay Nikolaevich. Rod. 1876. Shot on 7.10.1937/XNUMX/XNUMX.
    38. Petrenko-Lunev Sergey Vasilievich (Lunev Pavel Ivanovich) Rod. 1890. Shot on December 9.12.1937, XNUMX.
    39. Pokus Yakov Zakharovich. Rod. 1894, the verdict of the HCVS on July 16.07.1941, 10 "5 + XNUMX years", died in the camp.
    40. Primakov Vitaly Markovich. Genus. 18.12.1897. HCBS 26.10.1939/15/5 'XNUMX +XNUMX years', died in the camp.
    41. Putna Vitovt Kazimirovich. Rod. 1893. Shot on 12.06.1937/XNUMX/XNUMX.
    42. Sangursky Mikhail Vladimirovich. Rod. 1894. Shot on July 28.07.1938, XNUMX.
    43. Smolin Ivan Ivanovich. Rod. 1895. Shot on September 20.09.1937, XNUMX.
    44. Sokolov Vladimir Nikolaevich. Born 1896, 31.05.1939/20/5 'XNUMX +XNUMX 'years old, died in a labor camp.
    45. Storozhenko Alexey Alekseevich. Rod 1895. Shot in January 1938.
    46. ​​Tkachev Ivan Fedorovich. Rod. 1896. Shot on 29.07.1938/XNUMX/XNUMX.
    47. Turovsky Semen Abramovich. Rod 1895. Shot on 01.07.1937/XNUMX/XNUMX.
    48. Ugryumov Leonty Yakovlevich. Rod. 1887. Shot on 14.08.1937/XNUMX/XNUMX.
    49. Uritsky Semen Petrovich. Rod. 1898. Shot 1.08.1938.
    50. Feldman Boris Mironovich. Rod. 1890. Shot on 12.06.1937/XNUMX/XNUMX.
    51. Fesenko Dmitry Semenovich. Rod 1895. Shot in October 1937.
    52. Hakhanyan Grigory Davydovich. Rod. 1895. Shot February 23.02.1939, XNUMX.
    53. Khripin Vasily Vladimirovich. Rod. 1893. Shot on 29.07.1938/XNUMX/XNUMX.
    54. Tchaikovsky Kassian Alexandrovich Rod. 1893. Shot on July 10.07.1938, XNUMX.
    55. Eideman Robert Petrovich. Rod. 1895. Shot on 12.06.1937/XNUMX/XNUMX.
    1. 0
      13 July 2012 21: 28
      Quote: Company 8
      I can’t accommodate the divisional commanders and brigade commanders shot, there are hundreds of them.

      Well, already hundreds ... And then "millions, millions!" ...
      1. prispek
        +3
        13 July 2012 22: 35
        Where did you see "millions, millions!"? I read the posts of the 8th company three times and did not find it. A common practice, you attribute to your opponent what you have invented yourself and immediately refute it, it is very convenient, but it does not always work and not with everyone. On the other hand, are hundreds of divisional commanders and brigade commanders not enough for you? (I don’t think the commanders, I’ll write my opinion on them to Voroshny himself) And millions and millions are our losses and Stalin’s fault is here too, although not to the extent that Andrei believes.
    2. +1
      13 July 2012 22: 28
      Almost everything on the list is supporters of the creator of the Red Army Trotsky. Hence the predominance of Jewish surnames. This time.
      How they would manifest themselves during the Great Patriotic War is a big question. Some of the best representatives of their cohort - Marshals Kulik, Budyonny - have grown. These are two.
      Chickens in the fall believe - Hitler did not shoot his generals before the war, Stalin let some under the knife. Who won the war?
      1. 0
        13 July 2012 22: 58
        A good half of this list did not even have an ordinary military education, basically all of the former NCOs with a few exceptions. Yes, they had some combat experience of the Civil War, although mainly in suppressing peasant and sailor uprisings, it is not clear why the main "military genius" Tukhachevsky is not on the list, some of the actions of this person generally fall under the definition of war crimes, and the defeat of 1920. in the war with Poland, it still hangs as a shameful stain in our history. You are right, it is not known how all these corps commanders would behave on the battlefields of the Second World War, but I’m going to do something about it, they could definitely do it, it was not so simple in 1937 .............. .......
    3. prispek
      +3
      13 July 2012 23: 29
      Hello Andrey.
      Quote: Company 8
      For modern Stalinists, a list of those who could not fight the Germans thanks to the policy of your idol

      Andrei, don't you really think that these people would have stopped the Germans? I haven't looked through the entire list, but for some reason I randomly come across participants in the suppression of the Tambov uprising. Perhaps not all punishers are on the list. But the fact that everyone achieved high posts during the heyday of the genius of Marshal Tukhachevsky, I think. no doubt about it. And how our army fought in the late 30s and early 40s (and it fought according to the behest of the marshal) is known. Here is the division of the infantry into pinning and shock groups, as indicated in the article, as a result of which there was no one to attack in the Finnish war. And the production of universal 76mm guns, as a result of which the troops were left without anti-aircraft artillery. And anti-tank defense with barrage fire. Yes, a lot of things this "genius" of military thought heaped up. And to those who are on this list, what is called the distribution. I had to flutter my tongue less, and be clearer in my connections. So do not judge Stalin strictly. Yes, he was a "godfather" and acted accordingly, but he had a great goal. And his opponents were not nearly better, and they had no goals other than personal well-being. Best regards, punch.
      1. -2
        13 July 2012 23: 52
        Quote: prispek
        posts during the heyday of the genius Marshal Tukhachevsky,


        And he loves Tukhachevsky, it is very LIKE that he believes that the Germans would have been defeated in place of the Tukhachevs
        Quote: prispek
        And the production of universal 76mm guns, as a result of which the troops were left without anti-aircraft artillery

        Yes, they would have almost no artillery, even a little bit and everything would have become Dynamo-reactive ----- but this is not perceived. PT artillery is still better than everyone ---- although for some reason its basis is the divisional ZIS-3.
        And in Tambov, chemical weapons were used so that not a single peasant was injured.
      2. 8 company
        -3
        14 July 2012 00: 25
        Quote: prispek
        Hello Andrey.


        Hello, Vladimir! I was always very interested in the reasons for our defeats in 1941-42, and I collected in my personal archive a lot of information on the topic of the pre-war state of the Red Army and the defense industry. I can say, in short, that Tukhachevsky is not a genius, and he had errors - the same dynamo-reactive and universal artillery, but he did much more positive. The group of military leaders who rallied around him was significantly superior in military professionalism to the group that Stalin had left for the war — Voroshilov, Tymoshenko, Kulik ... Stalin was a very peculiar person, combining a lot of incompatible things. I usually compare it with a driver who simultaneously pressed on the gas and brake pedals. It is quite clear that he could not create a team of talented warlords for the war, focusing on the seemingly impressive number of tanks, divisions, etc. But all this military armada was destroyed from the inside by his policy of purges; permeated, like the rest of society, by massive denunciations, suspicion, terror against command personnel. Take a connection whose condition was a terrible summer in 1941. After all, several communications commissars were shot in a row, many large specialists. Who would want to take risks in such an environment by going to the abolition of outdated decisions, standards, instructions? But such a situation was literally everywhere. Even the KV and T-34 designers were nearly shot, miraculously slipped out. So it is necessary to judge Stalin, if only because today there are a mass of his followers who are ready to inform, stigmatize, and kill their political opponents, eager to return to the realm of mass political terror. And the fools do not understand that sooner or later they will go under the knife themselves, as the people of Yagoda, the people of Yezhov, and the people of Beria went.
        Best regards,
        1. 0
          14 July 2012 10: 42
          Quote: Company 8
          After all, several communications commissars were shot in a row, many large specialists. Who would want to take risks in such an environment by going to the abolition of outdated decisions, standards, instructions?



          It’s interesting, but is there anything specifically to be canceled? Maybe it’s just for inaction that it was shot?
          Quote: Company 8
          Even the KV and T-34 designers were nearly shot, miraculously slipped out

          Tukhachevsky stayed there probably weren’t these tanks in the project --- they weren’t suitable for fighting a classically heterogeneous enemy, unlike BT

          And is there evidence of how many people were repressed and shot under the influence of Tukhachevsky? Or was he white and fluffy to the top climbed without the use of undercover fighting?
        2. 0
          14 July 2012 17: 22
          Quote: Company 8
          Take a connection whose condition was a terrible summer in 1941. After all, several communications commissars were shot in a row, many large specialists.
          Duck for poor communication and shot. I did not establish a connection, a lead seal on the back of the head. Or do you personally Stalin himself had to pull it?
          1. Alf
            +1
            14 July 2012 17: 51
            It's just that in those great times there were 2 types of punishments - shooting and, if you were very lucky, the development of Siberia. Then, if the boss promised to do something by such and such a deadline and did not do it, he was not punished with a reprimand, he did not put up his pens, they say, it happened. Then it was different - did not follow the order - you will answer personally and to the fullest extent, without reference to "weather" and other "objective circumstances". It would be nice to introduce this practice now.
          2. 8 company
            0
            14 July 2012 22: 42
            Quote: Roman Dmitriev
            Duck for poor communication and shot.


            You are wrong.
            The beginning control communications commander Sinyavsky was arrested on December 22, 1937. Sentenced by the VKVS of the USSR on July 29, 1938 on charges of participation in a counter-revolutionary organization. Shot on July 29, 1938. Rehabilitated on August 18, 1956.

            Head of communications Commander Halepsky was dismissed on August 16, 1937, and was arrested on November 13, 1937 for participating in a fascist military conspiracy. On July 29, 1938, he was sentenced to death. Shot. In 1956, rehabilitated.

            No one was interested in the state of communication, because they revealed polls and spies.
            1. -2
              16 July 2012 16: 43
              Duck a poorly established connection or its absence is betrayal. After all, the main reason for the defeats of 1941 was the inability to coordinate the actions of the units in time, precisely because of the lack of communication. Since radio communication in the Red Army was practically absent (thanks to Tukhachevsky and your clients), and the wired was instantly destroyed by saboteurs or aircraft.
              1. 8 company
                -1
                16 July 2012 16: 49
                Quote: Roman Dmitriev
                Since radio communication in the Red Army was practically absent (thanks to Tukhachevsky and your clients),


                You want to say that after the destruction of the highest command staff of the Red Army in 1937-38. communication until 1941 , i.e. for 4 years no one was engaged?
                1. -1
                  16 July 2012 16: 56
                  Quote: Company 8
                  communication until 1941 , i.e. for 4 years no one was engaged?

                  Lost time is more expensive than money, but you can’t get it back. It’s still not to remember the military’s inertia as such. And the continuation of BT’s riveting after the Spanish War from the same opera.
                  1. 0
                    16 July 2012 18: 22
                    Quote: Company 8
                    You want to say that after the destruction of the highest command staff of the Red Army in 1937-38. communication until 1941 , i.e. for 4 years no one was engaged?

                    Why so. It is from this period of development that they most likely have begun. Remember that on the tanks of the old models the radio stations were only on commander’s (and those that immediately gave out the commander’s car), and on the T-34 and KV there were already walkie-talkies (and no longer ring type).
                    Kars, you kind of understand tanks, am I not mistaken?
                    1. 8 company
                      0
                      16 July 2012 19: 51
                      Quote: Roman Dmitriev
                      Why so? It is from this period of development that they most likely have begun.



                      You are mistaken again, work on providing troops with radio communications has been carried out since the 20s.
                      When an agreement was concluded with the French in the mid-1920s and the production of the first radio tubes with tungsten cathodes ("Micro" and others) began in the USSR, the first generation of military radio equipment appeared, the so-called "The first system of radio equipment for the Red Army communications troops" ... At the beginning of 1930 -x, the first tank radio stations appeared - 71-TK of the 1933 model, 71-TK-1 of the 1935 model and, finally, 71-TK-3 of the 1939 model. These latter were installed not only on the T-26 and BT-7 tanks, but also on the first versions of the T-34.
                      http://www.cqham.ru/forum/showthread.php?t=14053&page=1
                      1. 0
                        16 July 2012 20: 26
                        But the installation of radio stations without exception on all cars began precisely with the T-34, and even such a crew member as the radio operator marksman appears on the thirty-four and KV.
                    2. 0
                      17 July 2012 10: 14
                      There were few radios, but because of the lost time, they were not entirely successful and not brought to mind. Especially bad was the fact that the frequencies were disturbed by tremors, shaking.
              2. Brother Sarych
                +1
                16 July 2012 17: 50
                In fact, the network has data on the availability of radio stations in the Red Army - you will be surprised, but there were a lot of radio stations! Another thing is that they did not really know how to use them - from the first days there was also a fear of using them (you can check by memoirs) ...
                And wired communications were not so easily destroyed by saboteurs - the Germans did not have as many saboteurs, to our happiness ...
    4. +1
      13 July 2012 23: 31
      Just a thought in the ears: imagine waking up tomorrow, ...... and Stalin is in power. I wonder how many hundreds of generals and colonels would be shot for the first Chechen, and for the second? ..... So that is not so simple.
      1. -2
        13 July 2012 23: 54
        Quote: Vladimir 70
        and Stalin is in power

        Yes, God bless them with the generals, they can speak for imprisonment. Yes, and so already I even talked for a couple of years. So here the stick is not even about two ends.
  15. +2
    13 July 2012 22: 56
    We went to battle more than once
    Remember what happens:
    Friend next to you
    A bullet kills ..

    Stop for a moment
    Above the dead brother
    A scream comes from behind
    The company obscenities.

    A bullet whistles at the temple
    Alive soldier - hear.
    Funeral sheet
    The clerk will not write ...

    Here the desire is great
    Lean low.
    It’s far to victory
    And close to death.

    But the "Slavs" are growing,
    Blood labeled ...
    For the infantry first toast
    And for life with love!

    "One life and one death" -
    They speak at the front.
    For victory, drink to the bottom,
    Do not touch the excess!

    Jr. Lieutenant Markov Mikhail Ivanovich, former communications officer, intelligence officer,
  16. KOMOd Shpakov
    +2
    13 July 2012 23: 21
    Shaw - a quarter of the list of executing Jews explicit ... What would it be ??
  17. Kostya pedestrian
    +1
    14 July 2012 04: 29
    The preliminary stage of the war was lost by intelligence, led by Beria.
    The initial stage of the war was lost by the control system in the army, which was built by I.V. Stalin, when the war itself on the territory of the USSR was rejected.
    Only when G.K. Zhukov respectfully shouted at Stalin in preparing for the defense of Moscow, Stalin allowed his generals to make decisions on their own, without diminishing the fact that Stalin was still the leader who managed to rally the whole country and win!

    And for the initial mistakes, the infantry paid, first of all. My uncle, drafted from under Orel in the spring of 41, is one of those young guys who went missing in the first battles, fighting precisely for their Homeland and Stalin!
    1. Alf
      +1
      14 July 2012 17: 33
      Beria only headed intelligence of the NKVD (now the SVR), while military intelligence (now the GRU) was commanded by Golikov. Golikov was not injured after the outbreak of war, because Stalin had no complaints about the work of the GRU.
      1. Kostya pedestrian
        0
        15 July 2012 07: 05
        I know superficially about Golikov, from Soviet films, where his indecision is visible, and a suspicious distrust of the information received from their agents and anti-fascists, who have repeatedly provided very accurate and important data. Why did Sorge die?
        At this time, SVR agents hung out on exchanges, and monitored ram price increases. Stalin, and hence the SVR, believed that the Nazi Wehrmacht would need winter outerwear to invade the USSR.
        But the NKVD of Beria and Mechelson, performed the functions of the KGB, and for some reason very actively and unproductively intervened in all matters of the call, which resulted in the grouping of all aviation (including the I-16 with anti-aircraft missile systems) at several base airfields near Grodno, almost at the border, where, even with sufficient time, it would be impossible to take off.
        Then the disarmament of the pre-war line of defense (which is now restored in Belarus as the Stalin line), which could create a dangerous obstacle for the Nazis. It is disarmament, not the transfer of artillery batteries to new positions.
        Not to mention politics in the army, when the commissar could cancel any order of a higher-ranking military officer, fettered the army and, most importantly, did not give room for maneuver, which is vital in a modern war.
        I repeat once again - it was not the party who won, OUR PEOPLE won in spite of the party!
        1. Alf
          0
          15 July 2012 22: 51
          In your post above, you indicated that Beria’s intelligence had lost the initial phase of the war. When I pointed out this discrepancy, you very famously evaded this fact and transferred the conversation from the actions of the NKVD intelligence to the actions of the NKVD counterintelligence. This indicates that you have nothing to pluck my message.
          The Wehrmacht needed winter uniforms very soon after the invasion.
          Sorge was sentenced to death for refusing to return to the USSR.
          According to Golikov ... There was a war of intelligence, and the main problem is the lack of guarantee of the veracity of intelligence, i.e. it is impossible to know if the agent provided the real information or if he brought a misinformation slipped by enemy intelligence. Golikov was a professional and he knew that it was impossible to win a war with the USSR over the summer and that the Wehrmacht needed preparation for a war in winter, but this training was not conducted in Germany.
    2. Alf
      0
      15 July 2012 22: 57
      Addendum to my post below.
      The people won against the party.
      I wonder how the battalion company will fight if it fights against the will of its commander. I'm afraid he won’t even get to the front line.
      Try to imagine for yourself how the office in which you work will work if the staff will work separately and even against the will of management.
      Do not repeat the ravings of modern shit.
  18. 8 company
    -1
    14 July 2012 11: 00
    Quote: Kostya pedestrian
    The initial stage of the war was lost by the control system in the army, which was built by I.V. Stalin, when the war itself on the territory of the USSR was rejected.


    You are absolutely right. Stalin and his entourage tuned the propaganda machine of the USSR to the fact that we will fight on foreign territory and with little blood. Therefore, from the first days of the war, the real situation was not taken into account at all: Stalin kicked the General Staff, he issued directives like "throw out and attack Lublin." All large masses of Soviet troops on the march were immediately discovered by German aerial reconnaissance and devastating air strikes were inflicted on them. Thus, any major counterattacks in conditions of unstable communications and air supremacy of enemy aircraft were doomed. A completely different tactic was needed: to hold on with your teeth in places convenient for defense and for inflicting frequent and shallow counterattacks with small forces. Then there would be every chance that the Germans would get bogged down in such a system. A good example is the defense of Mogilev: one quite ordinary rifle division of the Red Army, supported by corps artillery, held the city in the direction of the main attack of the Center GA, where Guderian's elite divisions marched for 23 days. Not having a single tank, by the way.
  19. Kostya pedestrian
    0
    14 July 2012 17: 21
    Dear 8th Company,
    You are right that the Luftwaffe dominated the air, and most of the losses in the early days of the war we suffered precisely for this.

    And this is with successful experience at Khalkhin Gol, where our pilots not only reversed the extremely difficult situation in the air in a couple of days, but also completely displaced the Japanese from the sky, and Japan, at that time, had the most successful fighter models.

    Our pilots also established themselves as first-class fighters in the Spanish War, already fighting directly with the Germans.
    And there were still tankers, specialists, engineers, scouts.
    Where were these heroes 22.06.1941/XNUMX/XNUMX?
    Here I must agree with you that Stalin did not trust the Comintern in panic, as well as the military experts who returned "because of border business trips."
    It is appropriate to say that panic is the worst thing, it does not help to make informed decisions.
    Although, it seems to me, betrayal at the highest level took place, and someone needed to draw the USSR into a long-term and bloody war.
    So our soldiers survived, and defended our homeland, no matter what, and no one!
    1. 8 company
      +1
      14 July 2012 22: 30
      Quote: Kostya pedestrian
      Where were these heroes 22.06.1941/XNUMX/XNUMX?


      Heroes were ordered to place planes at airfields near the border, they complied with the order. The heroes were ordered to place large matsnabzheniya warehouses near the border, they placed. Then the Germans ground the aircraft, seized the warehouses. Who's guilty? Of course, the heroes. Kopets shot himself, Ptukhin was shot.
      1. -3
        14 July 2012 23: 02
        Quote: Company 8
        Heroes ordered to place planes at airfields near the border


        And? The Germans were able to destroy only 800 aircraft on the ground and the rest has already lost due to panic, poor communications, and so on.
        Quote: Company 8
        large matsnabzheniya warehouses near the border, they placed

        All the same, it’s interesting how many kilometers from the new border? 30? or maybe 120?
        Quote: Company 8
        to blame? Of course, the heroes. Kopets shot himself, Ptukhin was shot.

        And someone surrendered,
        Quote: Company 8
        The beginning control communications commander Sinyavsky was arrested on December 22, 1937. Sentenced by the VKVS of the USSR on July 29, 1938 on charges of participation in a counter-revolutionary organization. Shot on July 29, 1938. Rehabilitated on August 18, 1956.


        You see, they didn’t shoot for innovations in communications and rat proposals, so it’s not clear your opinion that those who came to their place were afraid of something. And is there anything about that WHAT this nach.upr did for his cadence?
  20. Kostya pedestrian
    +1
    14 July 2012 17: 37
    The great Chinese commander Xun Tzu said:
    "There are six types of ill-fated armies: running, dissolute, sinking, crumbling, disorderly and defeated. These six are not from Heaven and Earth, but from the mistakes of the commander."
  21. Isaev
    0
    14 July 2012 19: 02
    "The Red Army had 198 rifle, motorized rifle and mountain rifle divisions in its composition. Of these, 103 divisions, that is, almost 73% of the total, were deployed on the western borders of the USSR on the eve of the war."

    Does the author have difficulty with arithmetic? Not "almost more than 73", but 52%.
    1. +1
      14 July 2012 21: 07
      In total, the Red Army had 198 divisions (rifle, motorized rifle, mountain rifle), of which the 140 divisions were purely rifle, of which 103 (that is, more than 73%) was deployed on the western borders of the USSR on the eve of the war. The author had in mind 73% of 140 divisions .................
  22. Volkh
    -1
    18 August 2012 14: 08
    Quote: byrnas
    A good half of this list did not even have an ordinary military education, basically all of the former NCOs with a few exceptions. Yes, they had some combat experience of the Civil War, although mainly in suppressing peasant and sailor uprisings, it is not clear why the main "military genius" Tukhachevsky is not on the list, some of the actions of this person generally fall under the definition of war crimes, and the defeat of 1920. in the war with Poland, it still hangs as a shameful stain in our history. You are right, it is not known how all these corps commanders would behave on the battlefields of the Second World War, but I’m going to do something about it, they could definitely do it, it was not so simple in 1937 .............. .......

    you are completely unfamiliar with the activities of Tukhachevsky and open your mouth. It is not good and rude to do so.

    Quote: Kars
    Tukhachevsky stayed there probably weren’t these tanks in the project --- they weren’t suitable for fighting a classically heterogeneous enemy, unlike BT

    You lie here. You lie around.
  23. 0
    17 December 2016 02: 00
    I liked the article. The only comment on the article:
    By June 1941, the Red Army had 198 rifle, motorized and mountain rifle divisions. Of these, 103 divisions, that is, almost 73% of the total number, were deployed on the western borders of the USSR on the eve of the war

    103 divisions out of 198 divisions is 52,02%, not 73%. And the article itself is wonderful. 5+! good