War of England against Russia, Germany and the Slavs of the Balkans

40
The beginning of the First World War. Germany made a strategic mistake. In Berlin, it was believed that England would not fight. That Germany is ready for war, but in England and France they prefer to wait until Russia is combat-ready. In reality, the masters of the West deliberately pitted Russians and Germans, and deliberately led to the destruction of not only Germany, but also Russia.

War of England against Russia, Germany and the Slavs of the Balkans

The crowd listens to the announcement of the beginning of the war. Berlin. August 1914 of the year




Balkan "powder keg"


Balkan Wars 1912 — 1913 completed the liberation of the Slavs from Turkish oppression, but caused new problems. The contradictions between the Balkan countries intensified. The defeated Bulgaria longed for revenge and the return of the lost territories. Greece and Serbia were not satisfied with the borders of Albania. Italy wanted to strengthen its position in the western part of the Balkans. The Ottoman Empire was waiting for an opportune moment to take revenge, regain at least part of its positions on the peninsula, and take away the Aegean islands from Greece.

Behind the contradictions of the Balkan countries was a higher level of confrontation between the great powers in the Balkans and the Middle East. Germany strengthened its position in Turkey, England opposed it. In Sofia, Bucharest and Athens, there was a fierce diplomatic struggle between the Entente and the German bloc for the military-political orientation of the Balkan countries. So, Petersburg tried to incline Romania towards the Entente. Bucharest was actively trading. Romanians demanded concessions from the Austro-German Union at the expense of Hungary - in Transylvania. Therefore, Vienna believed that the matter was hopeless, since Hungary could not be cut in favor of Romania. Berlin, however, believed that it was necessary at all costs to keep Bucharest on its side. Therefore, Germany demanded concessions from Hungary to the Transylvanian Romanians. Also, the Russian government tried to restore the Balkan Union with Bulgaria, to attract Romania to it. In turn, Austro-German diplomacy drove offended Sofia to its side. In Berlin, they wanted to achieve rapprochement between Bulgaria and Turkey in order to neutralize the Entente in the Balkans through their joint efforts.

Austria-Hungary believed that in order to preserve the empire and suppress the national movement, it was necessary to crush the seditious hearth - Serbia. In Vienna, they saw in Serbia and South Slavic propaganda a danger to the future empire. Belgrade, however, cherished hopes for the creation of "Greater Serbia" on the ruins of the Habsburg empire. Russia traditionally supported Serbia, but was cautious, fearing a big war. Serbia was supposed to restrain Austria-Hungary.

Thus, Serbia became a convenient fuse for the start of the pan-European war. Russia could not leave an ally in trouble. Once the Austro-Serbian conflict broke out, it was enough for Petersburg this time not to yield to the Central Powers - and the Austro-Russian war would begin. The mechanism of military alliances would automatically work. Vienna could not have started a war without the consent of Berlin. And if such a war began, then the Second Reich is ready for it. France could not help supporting Russia, since the defeat of the Russians meant the collapse of hopes of revenge for the 1870-1871 war, and confrontation with the German bloc alone. In this situation, England also had to enter the war, as the masters of London and Washington organized a world war with the goal of destroying the Russian and German empires. England had to support France so that it could survive while the Russians would fight with the Germans in the East.

So the Balkans became the powder magazine of Europe. It was worth it to set fire to explode the entire European civilization. Therefore, in Belgrade and other Balkan capitals, special services and diplomats of the great powers, Masonic lodges, actively worked. The Serbian patriotic public, officers actively pushed for war, for the creation of "Great Serbia", for which it was necessary to destroy the Austro-Hungarian empire.

Anglo-German “rapprochement”


The main enemy of England was Germany. Rapid economic growth, military-industrial potential and fleet The Second Reich challenged the world British Empire, its dominance in trade, colonies and sea communications. The German world was dangerous for the Anglo-Saxons. It was a competitor within the western project itself. Anglo-German antagonism has become one of the main factors that caused the world war (along with the desire of the masters of the West to solve the "Russian question"). London and Washington needed to crush the German world for hegemony in Europe and the world.

However, in 1913 and in the first half of 1914 (almost until the very outbreak of World War II), the main efforts of London were aimed at masking the severity of the Anglo-German confrontation. British diplomacy did everything to deceive the Germans and lure Berlin into a trap. To Berlin before the very first shots of the World War was sure that England would remain neutral. Indeed, if in Berlin they knew for sure that England would take the side of France, then there was a high probability that the Second Reich would not have started the war. And the masters of the West needed Germany to start the war, become the "main instigator" and be defeated.

Therefore, before the outbreak of war, London flirted with Berlin in determining the borders in Albania. British diplomacy stopped putting sticks in the wheels of the Germans in financing the Baghdad Railway. For this, Berlin agreed not to continue the journey beyond Basra without the consent of the British, to the Persian Gulf coast, which was recognized as a sphere of influence of England. Also, by the summer of 1914, the Anglo-German convention on the division of the wealth of Iraq (oil from the Mosul district) was prepared. The British resumed negotiations on the 1898 agreement on the division of the Portuguese colonies. It was changed in favor of Germany. Now the Germans got almost all of Angola, although by agreement of 1898 they were transferred only part of this territory. This strengthened the position of German capital in Africa. Negotiations on the division of the Portuguese colonies as a whole were completed during the visit of the English King George V to Berlin in May 1913. This visit demonstrated the Anglo-German “rapprochement”. In August 1913, the Portuguese possessions agreement was initialed. True, London dragged on the signing and publication of the document until the end of July 1914, a few days before the outbreak of World War II.

British Foreign Minister Edward Gray (who held the post in 1905 - 1916 gg.) Did everything to impress Berlin that England will not participate in the war against Germany. In fact, London hypocritically encouraged the Second Reich to aggression. As a result of pacifist gestures and maneuvers of British diplomacy in Berlin and Vienna, it was decided that England would be neutral. In fact, it was an illusion that did not honor the Austro-German diplomats. The considerable contradictions inspired Berlin with the traditional contradictions of Russia and England, in particular, the conflict in Persia.


British Foreign Secretary Edward Gray


Germany decides to war


As conceived by the hosts of the West, Germany was to become the official instigator of the war. The Germans were going to “hang all the dogs”, accuse them of all crimes, so that they could easily dismember, plunder and rebuild the German world (Germany and Austria-Hungary). The second Reich was not going to save, he was initially sentenced to destruction. World War was conceived to create a “new world order”, and for this it was necessary to destroy the old world order, the monarchical empire, where the old aristocracy dominated. This old world stood in the way of the new - with the power of the “golden calf”, the slave-owning oligarchy and plutocracy (the political domination of the rich).

German military and political elite deceived. In Berlin, they were preparing for a traditional war: with the seizure of territories, resources, spheres of influence, but they did not think about a total restructuring of the political superstructure (only after the failure of the plans of the blitzkrieg they began to rely on the revolution in Russia). In the 1914 year, as it seemed in Berlin, the most favorable situation for the outbreak of war developed. Firstly, the Germans became convinced that England would not want to participate in the war with Germany. Secondly, Germany had the highest development rates among the capitalist powers, arming itself faster and better than anyone. As a result, the Germans better and faster than all prepared for war.

The calculations of the German elite were well laid out in July 1914 by the state secretary of the foreign affairs agency Yagov. “Basically,” wrote Yagov to the ambassador in London, “Russia is not ready for war now. France and England also do not want war now. In a few years, under all competent assumptions, Russia will already be combat-ready. Then she will crush us with the number of her soldiers; its Baltic fleet and strategic railways will already be built. Our group, meanwhile, is becoming increasingly weaker. ” The last words Yagov noted the expansion of the Habsburg Empire.

Thus, it was a strategic blunder of German diplomacy. Berlin believed that Germany was ready for war, and in England and France they prefer to wait until Russia is combat-ready. In reality, the masters of the West deliberately set off the Russians and the Germans, and deliberately did business to destroy not only Germany, but also Russia. The Russians acted as “cannon fodder”, and Russia was initially designated as a victim, not the victorious power. In Paris, London and Washington were not going to give the Russian Black Sea straits, Constantinople, Western Armenia, etc. The Russian empire was being prepared for destruction and dismemberment. Russia and Germany had to bleed themselves in a brutal and bloody massacre, and become victims of the masters of the West. Therefore, Russia's weakness in the 1914 year was a desirable factor for the masters of Paris and London. Russia lost a cadre army, the last stronghold of the Russian autocracy, in the war, and became an easy victim of the “fifth column” that the West had prepared.


Kaiser Wilhelm II in the foreground, Field Marshal August Von Mackensen in the second. Around 1914 of the year


Murder in Sarajevo


In Serbia and in the Slavic regions of the Habsburg Empire there were organizations that fought for the liberation of the southern Slavs from the power of Vienna and their unification into a single state. Among the officers of the Serbian army there was a secret organization "Black Hand". Its goal was the liberation of the Serbs, who were under the rule of Austria-Hungary, and the creation of "Great Serbia". The leader of the secret organization was Colonel Dragutin Dmitrievich (nicknamed Apis), the head of the Serbian counterintelligence. "Black Hand" has become a shadow government in the country. The Serbian government of Pasic was afraid of this organization, of a military coup. There were other similar organizations, some were democratic. It was a great soil for foreign intelligence.

The old Austrian emperor Franz Joseph lived out his last days (he ruled from 1848 of the year). The political life of the empire was increasingly gained by his nephew and heir to the throne, Archduke Franz Ferdinand. He did not belong to the "party of war", on the contrary, he planned a radical modernization of the empire, which gave a chance for its future. The heir was going to transform the dualistic monarchy (with a predominance of Austria and Hungary) into a triune state (Austria-Wengro-Slavia), where 12 national autonomies were formed for each large nation living in the Habsburg empire, not counting German formations and enclaves. The trialistic monarchy gave a chance to the monarchy and the Habsburg dynasty. Opponents of this idea was the “party of war”, which saw the exit in the rout of Serbia and “tightening the screws” in the Slavic regions of the empire. And the Hungarian elite, which, with such a reform, was losing control over vast territories - Croatia, Slovakia, Subcarpathian Rus, Transylvania and Vojvodina. Head of the Government of Hungary, Count Istvan Tysa even expressed his readiness for a new Hungarian revolution.

Thus, the peace plans of Franz Ferdinand interfered with the owners of the West, a significant part of the Austro-Hungarian elite and members of the Slavic secret societies, who dreamed about the collapse of the Habsburg Empire. Therefore, Franz Ferdinand was sentenced (as Stolypin had earlier, who did not allow Russia to be drawn into the war). Austria-Hungary had to oppose Serbia so that Russia would also be trapped.

For provocations they used members of secret Slavic societies. In the spring of 1914, it became known that in June the heir to the Austrian throne would arrive in Bosnia for military maneuvers. The Serbian counterintelligence believed it was a preparation for a war with Serbia. Mlada Bosna has passed a death sentence on Franz Ferdinand. Began preparing for the assassination. The performers were Gavrilo Princip and Nedelko Gabrinovich. Weapon the killers were supplied by the Black Hand, which has access to the arsenals of the Serbian army. That is, the trail led to Serbia.

The Serbian government guessed the plot and did not approve of it. Belgrade knew that St. Petersburg would not approve such an action that Russia was not ready for war. Serbia itself has not yet recovered from the consequences of the Balkan Wars. The Serbian authorities tried to prevent the murderers who were in Belgrade from returning to the Austro-Hungarian Empire. The government ordered not to let them across the border. But the Serbian border guards associated with the “Black Hand” did not follow this instruction. Then Belgrade, through its envoy in Vienna, warned the Austro-Hungarian government about the danger of Franz Ferdinand’s trip to Bosnia. But this warning, like others, was ignored. Also the security of the heir to the throne was poorly organized.

Thus, everything was done to eliminate Franz Ferdinand. Obviously, here the interests of the Austro-Hungarian “party of war”, the Serbian conspirators and the masters of the West coincided. 28 June 1914 Franz Ferdinand was killed by the Principle in Sarajevo (The murder of the Austrian Archduke Franz Ferdinand and the mystery of the outbreak of the First World War).


Archduke Austrian Franz Ferdinand


To be continued ...
40 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    3 August 2019 05: 07
    [Quote] In Berlin, they believed that England would not fight. [/ quote] And justify your "highlighted like"? You yourself at least understand that you are engaged in PROMOTION. And you operate with unfounded statements ... And you are carrying a fierce kuerga - and to whom did the zingers interfere with the krupps?
    [quote] To be continued ... [/ quote]
    The threat ... This ... NINADA!
    1. +2
      4 August 2019 12: 06
      Quote: RWMos
      In Berlin it was believed that England would not fight. And to justify your "highlighted like"?
      To do this, read, for example, Kernovsky World War (short essay):
      ... The ambiguous behavior of England, giving rise to the last minute to count on its neutrality, greatly contributed to the arrogance of the Kaiser ...
    2. +2
      5 August 2019 08: 44
      Quote: RWMos
      And to justify your "highlighted like"?

      Unfortunately ( wink ) in this case, the author is right. An analysis of the actions of British diplomacy leads precisely to such conclusions. Let me remind you that before the start of the WWI, Europe was already shaken by political international crises (Moroccan, for example), and it was firm, if not to say that the tough stance of London always had a sobering effect on Berlin. However, after Sarajevo, the behavior of England was exactly the opposite. No harsh statements, no warnings about the inadmissibility of the use of force by Germany ... All this raises a large number of questions from researchers and historians, and many come to the conclusion that England was pushing for war. And why ... probably because the latest super dreadnoughts, which Germany had not yet, were almost ready.
  2. +11
    3 August 2019 06: 10
    In reality, the masters of the West specifically pitted Russians and Germans

    Again for a penny fish ....
    Germany is not a brainless dog or a fighting cock that can be bled with someone: it is SAMA, with pleasure, with excitement, having its own reasons, consciously, it started the war.

    And no mythical, non-existent "masters of the West" were needed here.
    How many already, by the way, articles about these "owners" - and ... not a single donument, names, testimonies about them, nothing.
    Through the looking glass ...
    1. +8
      3 August 2019 11: 07
      How many already, by the way, articles about these "owners"

      Ha ha, I also thought about quitting, but still finished the chapter on the "Balkan barrel", where I was surprised to "find out" what.The Russian government tried to restore the Balkan Union together with Bulgaria, to attract into it and Romania"(?!?)
      The fact is that established propaganda phrases begin to live their own lives (in the mouths of "parrots")). So the pioneers from the stands of the rallies began to babble "comrades, the international position of our republic ..." (12th century)))
      And in general, it is not clear why they are the masters of only the "west", and not "the east, south and all the planet")))
      1. +11
        3 August 2019 12: 17
        "The fact is that the well-established propaganda phrases begin
        live your own life (in the mouths of "parrots")). "/////
        ----
        Absolutely right. Victor Pelevin once wrote about this in one
        from their stories.
        Samsonov's "Masters of the West", Stalin's "Trotskyite-Zinoviev Bloc"
        Hitler's "Alliance of American Imperialists and Railway Bolsheviks".
        Fictional term concepts begin to live
        his life, being embedded in the mass consciousness. And then no longer
        require evidence. Then they suddenly disappear (the regime changed, which
        from launched into life).
      2. 0
        4 August 2019 12: 12
        Quote: anzar
        The fact is that the well-established propaganda phrases begin to live their own lives (in the mouths of "parrots"))

        about Charykov’s mission in the know?
        1. +2
          4 August 2019 14: 06
          about Charykov’s mission in the know?

          And what, he "hires the masters of the West"?)) Let me remind you that the author says about the time AFTER 1912.
          But in general he meant rather (journalistic) verbal cliches. Like when artillery or aerospace forces strike, then by all means "congestion"militants / Hitlerites / Turks / etc. This creates an idea of ​​great damage. But why they" accumulated "usually do not indicate)))
          1. 0
            5 August 2019 10: 59
            Quote: anzar
            Let me remind you that the author talks about the time AFTER 1912.

            here I do not agree with you, it was impossible to change the policy to preserve the Balkan Union for the year:
            In St. Petersburg, the goal was still to restore and expand the Balkan Union. There was also a means to achieve this goal: French loans, which the Balkan states, desperate for war, desperately needed. Relying on Paris, where he was also interested in forming an anti-German coalition in the Balkans, Sazonov zealously reconciled Serbia with Bulgaria, Greece with Turkey, Bulgaria and Greece, but the main obstacle to achieving his goal was not where Sazonov expected. On October 20 (November 2), 1913, when negotiations with Turkey and the Balkan states were still in full swing, sensational news came to Petersburg: German General Liman von Sanders was appointed commander of the corps of the Turkish army.
            Sazonov was increasingly inclined to the conclusion that a clash with Germany was inevitable. In the midst of the conflict over the mission of Lyman von Sanders, in November - December 1913, he considered the issue of strengthening the anti-German coalition by strengthening relations with England and attracting Romania to Russia.
            On February 8, 1914, under the chairmanship of Sazonov, a special meeting of a number of ministers was held, discussing the "program of action" in the event of events that "radically change the international situation of the Straits of Constantinople." In accordance with this course, the subsidy of Montenegro was renewed (subject to its close alliance with Serbia), and negotiations began with Serbian and Greek prime ministers to restore the Balkan Union. A meeting also took place between Nicholas II and the Romanian king, during which negotiations continued on bringing Romania to Russia. At the same time, Petersburg continued to push for a change in the pro-Austrian government in Bulgaria.
            1. +2
              5 August 2019 13: 59
              here I do not agree with you, it was impossible to change the policy to preserve the Balkan Union for the year:

              Impossible, so impossible. But what kind of "preservation" are we talking about? He fell asleep after the "arbitration" of the Russian emperor and the Second Balkan War. Only the "alternatively gifted" Russian diplomacy can hope for Bulgaria's "accession" to such an alliance. But this is not the first time for her, that Nicholas 1; that Alexander 3 ... especially in the Balkans))
              At the same time, Petersburg continued to push for a change in the pro-Austrian government in Bulgaria.

              Hehe, it seems to be within the framework of the "attraction" to the union))). That is the whole naivety of p. diplomacy. Not the government, let alone the monarch, but the people would not have allowed the Macedonian population to be left under Serb terror. Could have removed Ferdinand and he knew it. So the policy is not "pro-Austrian", but "pro-Bulgarian", otherwise B-I would have joined the AVI back in 14g.
              RI made its choice back in 13g. And who is "in charge" in the alliance with Serbia can be seen from the (already real) attempts to attract Bulgaria in 15 (during the Dardanelles operation) and Serbia's response to the completely fair demands of the allies. Then we already know how it all ended. With such an ally, enemies are not necessary))) ... now too. Although there is a positive, it was the 1999 crisis that "threw" the EBN and brought the GDP to power. hi
              1. -1
                5 August 2019 16: 20
                Quote: anzar
                He fell asleep after the "arbitration" of the Russian emperor and the Second Balkan War.

                I agree with your assessment, but the author has to do with it. Why arrange a clowning party.
                I think the article is adequate (although from the label of the owners of the West, it makes me sick).
    2. +1
      5 August 2019 08: 52
      Quote: Olgovich
      Germany is not a brainless dog or a fighting cock that can be bled with someone: it is SAMA, with pleasure, with excitement, having its own reasons, consciously, it started the war.

      Agree
    3. -1
      5 August 2019 17: 57
      Quote: Olgovich
      And no mythical, non-existent "masters of the West"

      Quote: Olgovich
      Through the looking glass ...

      Have you really been interested in the topic and, or so, manure on the fan? If something is not included in your circle of knowledge or interests, it does not mean at all that it is not. This is just a level of awareness. request But militant illiteracy is so militant ... angry laughing
      Quote: Olgovich
      How many already, by the way, articles about these "owners" - and ... not a single donument, names, testimonies about them, nothing.

      Yes, full of those. Everything is in excess and freely available.
      And the topic of WWI in this regard is sucked to the bone.
      Do not shine with your denseness.
      1. -1
        6 August 2019 06: 55
        Quote: bayard
        Have you really been interested in the topic and, or so, manure on the fan?

        belay I do not touch your manure
        Quote: bayard
        But militant illiteracy is so militant.

        Reading you, disagreeing with this thesis is difficult
        Quote: bayard
        Yes, full of those. Everything is in excess and in the public domain

        Name, liar, these owners of the West - last names, documents, decisions. Present only DOCUMENTS, not chatter.
        1. -1
          6 August 2019 13: 47
          laughing
          Quote: Olgovich
          Call, liar, these masters of the West-last name

          Boruch.
          Overcome only this last name. Google to help you.
          For development, on the topic of the article - Yankel Schiff, a confidant of Comrade Borukh and coordinator of the processes of wars and revolutions at the turn of the 20th century (pre-war financing of Japan, RJV, revolution of 1905 - 7, WWI, coordination of the "Russian revolutionary movement", Coordinator Trotsky and his comrades, had a younger brother Sverdlov in his staff, through whom the financing of, including the October coup, the coordination of the Civil War through Trotsky and Sverdlov (at the first stage), coordination of the placement of personnel after the victory in the Civil War ...).

          Comrade Boruch, by the way, was the OWNER, including the Manhattan project. Personal capital by the 60s exceeded a trillion more of those - old dollars.

          Capitalism is the power of capital, and capital is usually private rather than social in nature. And inherited.
          Loves the shadow and silence.
          Manages indirectly.
          It multiplies from generation to generation.

          You need to know your owners, and not call them "ichtamnets".
          However ... apparently you have such a job.
          Then request ... pitchfork in your hands.
          1. 0
            7 August 2019 09: 52
            Quote: bayard
            Boruch.
            Overcome only this last name. Google to help you.
            For development, on the topic of the article - Yankel Schiff, a confidant of Comrade Borukh and coordinator of the processes of wars and revolutions at the turn of the 20th century (pre-war financing of Japan, RJV, revolution of 1905 - 7, WWI, coordination of the "Russian revolutionary movement", Coordinator Trotsky and his comrades, had a younger brother Sverdlov in his staff, through whom the financing of, including the October coup, the coordination of the Civil War through Trotsky and Sverdlov (at the first stage), coordination of the placement of personnel after the victory in the Civil War ...).

            Yeah delirium sneaking in by the Boruchs. lol Rt
            DOCUMENTS of the "masters of the West" - about the unleashing of WWI, "playing off" Russia and Germany, the war against the Slavs, etc. - we, apparently, will not wait Yes
            Quote: bayard
            Capitalism is the power of capital, and capital is usually private rather than social in nature. And inherited.
            Loves the shadow and silence.
            Manages indirectly.
            It multiplies from generation to generation.

            SURNAMES and DOCUMENTS of the "owners" - on the table, leave your empty chatter to yourself
            Quote: bayard
            You need to know your owners, and not call them "ichtamnets".
            However ... apparently you have such a job.
            Then ... the pitchfork is in your hands.

            chatter .... Again! am

            If you have nothing to say except this garbage, do not bother me anymore. hi
  3. +3
    3 August 2019 07: 20
    (only after the failure of the blitzkrieg plans did they begin to bet on the revolution in Russia)
    ... So the Germans allocated money for the February revolution? laughing
  4. +5
    3 August 2019 20: 56
    I read to the phrase Masters of the West laughing
    1. +1
      5 August 2019 11: 17
      Quote: Krasnodar
      I read to the phrase Masters of the West

      That mastered well done:
      Open another look business newspaper from 5.08.2019/XNUMX/XNUMX
      article:
      The real owners of Europe .https: //vz.ru/world/2017/9/25/888029.html
      blog Valentina Yurievich Katasonova (born April 5, 1950, USSR) - Russian scientist-economist, doctor of economic sciences. -Real masters of Europe.
      http://zavtra.ru/blogs/g-30_kto_v_dejstvitel_nosti_upravlyaet_evropoj
      Yes, there is about the hosts of the United States.
      1. 0
        5 August 2019 11: 31
        Thanks for the link, I read it with interest, but these are not the owners of Europe)). Financial bigwigs lobbying their interests - no more! Now the world is divided into centers of power, and they rule the countries with the largest consumer ability hi
        1. 0
          5 August 2019 18: 01
          And who rules the countries?
          Every good thing has its master.
          1. -1
            6 August 2019 00: 18
            Interesting groups, changing depending on whose candidate won the election and the winning candidate himself, who, in some cases, these groups can move or promote their interests taking into account their own
            1. +1
              6 August 2019 00: 33
              Yes, you are a democrat, my friend ... although, by the way, democracy (the power of the demos - a wealthy minority in Greek society) is the power of capital ... But all money has a master ...
              Here in crime there are those who look over the city / region, and those who look over those who look. But this is tracing paper from what we are talking about.
              Money loves silence. AND STABILITY.
              Capital is usually private rather than social in nature. And inherited. Within families, there may be inheritance graters, but this does not concern society ... but he does not know about it. And should not.
              It is in such circles that "the fate of the world" is determined. With elements of collegiality or ... democracy, in its literal Greek sense, the highest circles of DEMOS. And OHLOS hoes his garden and watches TV.
              feel Something like this .
              1. -1
                6 August 2019 00: 34
                Well, did I write? )))
                About criminality - starting from the mid-0s - it is controlled by other structures laughing
                1. 0
                  6 August 2019 00: 37
                  I know, I remember, I watched.
                  1. -1
                    6 August 2019 01: 21
                    There is simply no such thing - the masters of the West - such as gatherings where they choose the beholder. There are interest groups that are in conflict, with an unstable composition, who in their interests are seeking the interests of certain politicians - that’s all
  5. +6
    3 August 2019 23: 30
    Need an Alternative History section. For the opuses of some authors.
    1. -1
      4 August 2019 12: 16
      Quote: Ken71
      Need an Alternative History section. For the opuses of some authors.

      the author may be wrong, distort (this is his opinion). But commentators should check, not write nonsense.
      1. +3
        4 August 2019 13: 14
        I rubbed a hole in the keyboard checking. Some opuses are easier to immediately attribute to the alternative and perceive as fun fiction
        1. +1
          5 August 2019 11: 43
          Quote: Ken71
          perceive as funny fiction

          Rather like stupid, sad and sad.
          So in such articles:
          1.Author Chronicle of the fall of Soviet genetics May 14, 2019 praises Vavilov, but at the end of the bogeyman-
          In particular, one can find in this little book material about genetics under the name “Fly-lovers-haters” authored by Alexander Studitsky from 1949.
          (the book contains criticisms of eugenics, and Vavilov is not clear here).
          2. Earth to the peasants in the Wrangel style. Key reform idea April 21, 2019
          There, one bright head for the 6th year of the war offered a 20% annual mortgage to the applause of commentators. It is interesting if Stalin offered such a mortgage in 1945-46 (well, the people and party comrades would have thought the same way as the people and comrades-in-arms of this head). did the commentators also ply and rejoice? And would you take a mortgage at 20%?
          3. Olennikov’s cycle about the heroes of officers is all right, only one question of these heroes didn’t miss a beat when the tsar abdicated. Everything is wonderful, and the article: A. S. Lukomsky. General and writer
          On June 25, 2019, in the same spirit, only the author did not take into account the memoirs of the hero himself and the writer (in the Archive of the Russian Revolution Vol. 2 Alexander Sergeyevich Lukomsky. From the memoirs, p. 14-44). Where he persuades the tsar to recant, breaks down the generals, one of author of the manifesto of renunciation. And that’s all in wartime. It is no coincidence that for the full quotation of the monarchist Gen. A.D. Nechvolodov to this hero I have 2 bans for insults and nats.rozn. I wonder why the author Olennikov produce laudatory articles about traitors?
          So this author is somewhat emotional, but in principle everything is correctly described. Yes, and commentators, in fact, practically have no objections.
      2. 0
        4 August 2019 13: 32
        Quite the opposite. Eto commentators can make mistakes, distort (this is THEIR opinion). But the author should check, not write nonsense. It's not about estimates, but about facts. You cannot write something that was not in FACT and draw "conclusions" on that basis.
        1. +1
          5 August 2019 11: 44
          Quote: anzar
          Eto commentators may be wrong

          Well, who are the authors of the articles? The same as we are, only dare and have something to say.
          Try it yourself, maybe then you will think differently.
        2. 0
          5 August 2019 19: 37
          Then here's a decent comment from comments:
          Alexey Sommer (Alexey Sommer) Today, 16:30 New +1

          Well, at least almost without obvious distortions, the essence is stated.
          You can put the author of the article. Where we made a mistake we can indicate here.
    2. 0
      5 August 2019 11: 05
      Quote: Ken71
      Need an Alternative History section. For the opuses of some authors.

      Why, if there is a section of stories, tales and entertainment under the history section.
  6. +3
    4 August 2019 00: 21
    "In Berlin, they believed that England would not fight. That Germany was ready for war, while in England and France they prefer to wait until Russia is combat-ready."
    In two consecutive proposals, the information is directly opposite - on the one hand, the Germans believe that England will not fight, but at the same time, England, according to the Germans, is preparing together with France for war and is only waiting for the moment when Russia intensifies.
    "In reality, the masters of the West deliberately pitted the Russians and the Germans, and deliberately led matters to the destruction of not only Germany, but also Russia."
    And why were only Russians and Germans playing off? And how do you like this plot from the field of propaganda: "The masters of the East (the same unknown as the masters of the West) deliberately played off the Germans and the French and deliberately led things to the destruction of not only Germany, but also France." And in addition, these wickedness deliberately pitted two fraternal peoples - the Germans and the British (the latter, as you know, moved to Britain from Germany). Then the owners set the Italians against the Germans and Austrians, with whom they were in the Triple Alliance until 1914.
    In general, the owners are so omnipotent that they can set everyone on each other whenever they want, and we only need to be poor to gnaw each other’s throats at their whim.
  7. 0
    4 August 2019 02: 54
    The background of the war was 100% economic. The Berlin-Baghdad railway was supposed to pass through Serbia, and the British tried to block this project. Russia also had economic interests in Serbia - plans to build a railway road to the Adriatic, bypassing the Bosphorus and the Dardanelles. Thus, Serbia was at the intersection of two strategic railways.
    1. +2
      4 August 2019 13: 49
      Is that what you have, "alternative history"?
      The Berlin-Baghdad railway was supposed to go through Serbia ...

      And WHERE do you think the "orient-express" was held before? They were feeding to block the continuation much east of Istanbul.
      Russia also had economic interests in Serbia - plans to build a railway to the Adriatic bypassing the Bosphorus and Dardanelles

      But not bypassing Austria-Hungary? And in general economy. what's the point? And how "UTB" can justify the war, I hesitate to ask)))
  8. -1
    5 August 2019 12: 20
    I wonder when Samsonov finally go crazy?)))
    1. 0
      5 August 2019 16: 22
      Quote: smaug78
      I wonder when Samsonov finally go crazy?

      And I’m wondering what kind of clowns clown the site, from which circus?
  9. 0
    29 August 2019 01: 38
    Conspiracy theory, of course, is an attractive thing, but completely primitive and only a very narrow-minded character will find something interesting in this. Fortunately, the Germans had their own plans for the redivision of the world, and they did it. Nobody blew anyone out there, it was just all the others who went about the Teutons and nearly fell asleep, and the RI and the Ottomans completely collapsed.