Secrets of deportations. Part of 2. Karachay

64
The Karachay-Cherkess Republic is another Caucasian autonomy, which is still trying in vain to overcome and forget the difficult legacy of eviction during the Great Patriotic War. However, as it turned out, it is no less difficult to forget the period that is called the “first wave of return”. It fell on 1955 — 1965 years and almost coincided with the dramatic redistribution of borders after the re-unification of Karachay with Circassia into a single autonomous region within the Stavropol region, which was promptly rotated by order from the Kremlin in February 1957.

Secrets of deportations. Part of 2. Karachay




In fact, in the Kremlin, in fact, they followed only the process: the numerous Caucasian “governors” themselves after the 20th Congress of the CPSU were in a hurry to report to Moscow in “overcoming the consequences of the personality cult” of a wide variety. On national issues as well. In the numerous letters leaving then to Moscow, but, as a rule, they did not reach it, the local residents, mostly from among those who were not deported, wrote that they had again “laid under the Karachay” Circassians. The consequences of such an international decision affect today.


If desired, in stories Caucasus, you can find a "justification" for any territorial divisions

Quite recently, the initiative groups of the Circassians and the Abazins declared their plans to create in the north of the Karachay-Cherkess Republic a separate dual autonomy within the Stavropol region. The reasons for this initiative are known, although they are not very actively covered by the central media: the republic is experiencing growing socio-economic, linguistic and political discrimination of less numerous ethnic groups on the part of the Karachai people.

These statements became in essence an attempt to continue the work begun with the sending to Moscow of an open letter to President V. Putin with practically the same content. As it is known, it was signed by Abu-Yusuf Banov, representing the “Council of Elders of the Circassian People”, Janibek Kuzhev from the public organization “Abaza” (self-name Abaza) and Rauf Daurov from the “Center of Circassian Culture”.

It should be recalled that all this has already happened, and it was quite a long time ago. The same proposals were made by representatives of the indigenous population of a number of regions of Karachay-Cherkessia four decades ago. The assessment that the Chairman of the KGB of the USSR Yuri Andropov gave to such initiatives, who sent a memo to the Politburo on December 9 of December 1980, is indicative. She is absolutely characteristic of that era, probably not accidentally called the “era of stagnation”, the name: “On the negative processes in the Karachay-Cherkessia Autonomous Region”.

So, excerpts from the document.

“Among a certain part of the indigenous population of the autonomous region, there are negative processes characterized by nationalistic, especially anti-Russian sentiments. On this basis, there are antisocial manifestations, as well as criminal offenses. The nature of these processes is also influenced by hostile elements from among persons of the older generation who have taken part in the armed struggle against the Soviet system, including in 1942-1943
Under the influence of the ideas of nationalism, some representatives of the creative intelligentsia in their works emphasize the national superiority of the Karachai people, endowing with the positive qualities of the former traitors of the Motherland portrayed by them. The Circassian population and other national groups are discontent with the fact that they are actually “distant” from most of the leadership positions in the region in various fields ... ”


As we can see, the national problems, no matter how urgent they are, could not be solved either during the period of dethronement of the personality cult or under developed socialism. There is a feeling that even now many in the federal center would simply like to let go of the brakes. Moreover, sometimes not the most successful experience from Soviet history is taken into service.

And the Soviet leadership (true Leninists, and therefore internationalists) was not originally a supporter of creating numerous ethnic autonomies in the North Caucasus, acting on the principle of “later on gathering torment,” voiced by Sergo Ordzhonikidze.

Not too numerous ethnic groups simply united, regardless of how close they are to each other ethnically and culturally. Religious preferences in the country of state atheism were ignored altogether, as long as everything was territorially decent. However, it is usually precisely because of the territories that conflicts on national and religious grounds flared up, as it has become increasingly frequent now. On the basis of this approach, not only Karachay-Cherkessia, but also Chechen-Ingushetia and Kabardino-Balkaria were formed. But Ossetia was divided into South and North, and even after August 2008, there is still very, very far from universal national happiness.

Karachay-Cherkess Autonomy itself, first in the status of the region, was formed in 1922 year. Its basis was the Karachaevsky National District from the then High Mountain Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic. But in the 1926 region, it was decided to divide into Karachai Autonomous Region and the Circassian National District as part of Stavropol, then the North Caucasus Territory, which at the end of 30's will be named after the very expert on the national issue - Ordzhonikidze. At the same time, a rather large Circassian enclave will remain in Karachai, more precisely, if approached formally, an exclave.



The excesses between the Circassians and Karachai appeared almost immediately, although they, in fact, did not stop almost never, just now there was a rather serious reason. At the same time, various anti-Soviet groups that began to form in the mountains easily united the representatives of both ethnic groups. Both those and others actively tried to disrupt collectivization, fought against the elimination of private property, and by all possible means counteracted the authorities' offensive against Islam. In addition, the warring nations unitedly opposed the introduction of the Russian language and other Soviet events, and most importantly - against the mandatory military draft, although they did not refuse to serve with the king.

Moreover, up to half of these groups, mainly Karachai, managed to hold out in such a kind of underground until the German occupation of the North Caucasus in August 1942 of the year. And when the fascist German troops in February-March 1943 were expelled from the Caucasus, the Karachays and Circassians immediately returned to partisan activities. With the support of the German and Turkish intelligence services, they managed to hold out for another three or four years. There is quite extensive information about those sabotage groups that managed to get help from Western, first of all, British special services, it took even more time to eliminate them.

The rapid advance of the German troops to the Main Caucasian Range caused literally a barrage of new anti-Soviet excesses. The response of the security services were brutal repression, which are often clearly delayed. Almost immediately, sometimes even before the arrival of the Germans, most of the people from the well-to-do ethnosocial strata, as well as from those who fought in the Civil War against the Bolsheviks and the White Guards, left the underground and found themselves in the ranks of collaborators. The “victims” of the atheistic events, the victims of expropriation, as well as the numerous supporters of the independence of the so-called united Adyghe-Circassian-Balkarian Republic, also moved there.

From representatives of just such layers, the German authorities formed the autumn of 1942-th "Karachaevsky National Committee" headed by K. Bairamukov and "Circassian National Government" headed by A. Yakubovsky. In this regard, it is characteristic that in Berlin, in contrast to Moscow, they immediately took into account the complex relations between the Circassians and Karachais, creating there not just one but two puppet structures according to ethnic principle.

“The Karachaevsky National Committee” at the same time received specific powers: “it was transferred to the Soviet state, collective farm and public property, as well as management of the economy, culture and propaganda (under German control)”. He, according to the same data, participated in the occupation repressions, financially assisted the invaders, established contacts with other collaborators in the region, with national units of the SS and the Wehrmacht. Not hesitating about this, during the occupation of the region, local puppet newspapers and magazines also reported.



The committee even managed to proclaim the unification of Karachai and Balkaria into “united Karachay” with the capital where you would think - in Russian Kislovodsk!

In November 1943 of the year, A. Leontiev, the head of the USSR NKVD Anti-Gang Division, reported to the USSR Deputy Chief of the Interior Affairs S. Kruglov: “Soon after the occupation, the German command in Karachai established close ties with local nationalists, gang leaders, clergy and Murid leaders sect. And from their representatives created the so-called "Karachay National Committee". The committee was headed by Kady Bayramukov and Muratbi Laypanov (deputy. - Auth.), Subsequently (from May 1943 to April 1944 of the year. - Auth.) Working in the German Intelligence School in Beshui under Simferopol. ”

All this testifies to only one thing: there were grounds, and considerable ones, for the mass deportation from the Soviet leadership. For the then practice, it was generally almost the norm. And in comparison with the deportation of the Circassians, even under tsars, there are flowers at all. The eviction itself was carried out very quickly: from 2 to 22 in November 1943, tens of thousands of people (it is estimated that the total number of deported Karachai exceeds 65 thousand) “moved” to Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. There is no reliable statistics on the dead and missing during the deportations. Up to 85% of Karachai territory was transferred to Georgia (the rest - to the Circassian Autonomous Region and to the Stavropol Territory).

However, indiscriminately accusing the Karachays of cooperating with the occupiers is, to put it mildly, hyperbole. According to the Generalized Data Bank "Memorial" and a number of other sources, more than nine thousand people from Karachai died and went missing on the fronts of the Great Patriotic War. More than 17 thousands of Karachai went to the front. 11 of them were awarded the title Hero of the Soviet Union.

In the war years, the residents of Karachai gathered and sent to the front in 1941-1943. six wagons of collective, individual gifts and, additionally, 68 650 units of various woolen and leather goods (as well as national cheese, lamb, goat's milk, koumiss, mineral waters, medicinal herbs). In the battles for the passes of the Main Caucasus Range, 17 guerrilla units participated, nine of which were almost exclusively Karachai. The guerrillas of the Karachai and Karachai-Abazin nationalities R. Romanchuk, Z. Erkenov, M. Isakov, Z. Erkenova, I. Akbaev, X. Kasaev, J. Chomaev, and many others, fell to the death of the brave in these battles.

The very fact of rehabilitation, and then repatriation of Karachai people, as well as other Caucasian peoples, testifies only to the questionable principledness of the then Soviet justice and the complete unprincipledness of the special services and the top leadership of the country, which replaced Stalin’s. The decision to return was made on the personal instructions of the first secretary of the Central Committee of the CPSU, Nikita Khrushchev, already in 1955.

And in February 1957, the Karachay-Cherkess Autonomous Region was recreated as part of the Stavropol region. For all this time, the internal borders of autonomy have changed at least five times, and the borders with Stavropol - and even more. At the same time, Moscow also made decisions on the maximum favoring of the Karachai people, as, incidentally, to other “exiled” peoples. And this, in turn, provoked numerous conflict situations between them, on the one hand, and the Circassians, Russians, Abazins - on the other. These conflicts smolder to this day, more often inflaming before direct collisions using weapons.
64 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    25 January 2019 06: 27
    For all this time, the internal boundaries of autonomyand changed at least five times, and the borders with Stavropol - and even more so. At the same time, Moscow made decisions on the most favorable conditions for Karachais, as well as other “exiled” peoples. And this, in turn, provoked numerous conflict situations between them, on the one hand, and Circassians, Russians, and Abazins, on the other. These conflicts are smoldering to this day, increasingly flaring up to direct clashes with weapons.

    and every time the borders changed at the expense of the Russians.
    the smartest policy in this matter was politics on the eve of the revolution: while preserving their identity, the peoples of the Caucasus fused as a part of united Russia.
    1. +3
      25 January 2019 10: 09
      Here I agree with you. National policy and administrative-cultural division are one of the reasons for the collapse of the Union.
    2. +3
      25 January 2019 13: 40
      Of course, the creation of national autonomies in the North Caucasus was stupid. And the stupidity in Cuba was the unification of autonomy of ethnically different and historically hostile peoples. During my military service, I had a sergeant in my company - a Kabardian. So he talked about the mutual hatred of Kabardians and Balkars. These nationalities per 1000 words have one thing in common. But they communicate with the Circassians without any problems. The Balkars and Karachais are the same. And these nations are united by hatred of the Russians. Although there are exceptions. I have relatives in the CBD and as a child I visited them a couple of times. There were several Kabardians in the company of my second cousin. Everything is like all children: today they’re friends to the grave, tomorrow they’re enemies, the day after tomorrow they’re friends again, but all his communication with the Balkars came down to fights on the side of the Kabardins, even I was lucky to participate. Accordingly, Russian boys also fought in the Balkar team.
      1. +9
        25 January 2019 14: 09
        The national policy of the USSR is a separate topic that has not yet been successfully addressed at the Higher Defense Organization, and, apparently, no one has set such a goal.
        As for the unity of the "mountain peoples" in hatred of the Russians - this is unambiguous. In my battalion there were 22 nationalities of the former USSR, including the entire Caucasus with all their ethnic conflicts. However, against the Russians, they united without problems, immediately forgetting that they were cutting each other at home.
      2. +8
        25 January 2019 14: 15
        About Balkars, most likely - in the next section. Everything is cool there, they seem to be a very special case of deportation. We are now studying the documents - some kind of horror ... We went under the fascists so much that ... and it was a shame
        1. +1
          25 January 2019 14: 57
          Quote: podymych
          About the Balkars, most likely - in the next part

          I expect with interest. It was infa (with dates and part numbers) that the KGB and the Red Army in 1942 destroyed several rebel Balkar auls.
        2. -1
          25 January 2019 15: 02
          Thank you Alexey! I look forward to continuing the cycle.
        3. +4
          25 January 2019 22: 58
          And you Chechens take an interest. Become a complete cynic ..
        4. -1
          7 May 2020 19: 15
          Well it is necessary to say such nonsense. When the Germans came to the SevKav, out of 37 thousand Balkars, 16 had long been at the front. They deported women, children and the elderly, while they fought at the front and did not know anything about deportation. Under the Germans, the Kabardians fell, this is known. The Kabardian writer A. Keshokov described this event in detail, for this reason he was forced to live in exile in Moscow, and he was ordered to enter his home. Do not mislead people pzhl and, to be honest, I think you are a follower and relative of Z. Kumekhov, if not, your ignorance is not excusable. God is your judge.
      3. +5
        25 January 2019 14: 52
        he talked about the mutual hatred of Kabardians and Balkars.

        Why did the Communists create republics from peoples mutually hating each other?
        Chechen-Ingushetia, Kabardino-Balkaria, Karachay-Cherkessia. At the same time, the Russian leader with two national deputies was usually headed.
        Obviously, this was no accident, and it worked. Now the old system was destroyed, but the new one was not created. Clans seized power in the republics, nepotism reigns supreme. It will not work to let go on the brakes.
      4. 0
        26 January 2019 21: 33
        Quote: AK1972
        Everything is like all children: today they’re friends to the grave, tomorrow they’re enemies, the day after tomorrow they’re friends again, but all his communication with the Balkars came down to fights on the side of the Kabardins, even I was lucky to participate. Accordingly, Russian boys also fought in the Balkar team.

        I lived as a child in the Greek SSR in the city of Poti. Georgians, Kurds, Armenians, Jews, Ukrainians, Russians, even some Assyrians lived in the courtyard .. (God knows which ones). In childhood, there is no nationality .... There are friends from our yard and there is a strange yard where other children live .. Fought the yard against the yard .. Nationality did not matter what ... Interestingly, I’ve not seen another friend of this international yard .
  2. +4
    25 January 2019 07: 11
    Interestingly, will there be an article about the very first deported people?
  3. +16
    25 January 2019 07: 50
    Nothing was done then for nothing.
    Some peoples have established themselves as friends of the Wehrmacht and carriers of the "knife in the back" for the Red Army.
    And clear measures were not long in coming. The Soviet state reacted clearly and harmoniously.
    Wartime, as different.
    1. -8
      25 January 2019 10: 09
      Quote: XII Legion
      And clear measures were not long in coming. The Soviet state reacted clearly and harmoniously.

      35 children were exiled, of whom 000 were killed.
      1. +11
        25 January 2019 12: 58
        Quote: Olgovich
        of which 22 died

        I would not advise you to trust the information of Caucasian historians about thousands of tortured Caucasians and hundreds of Heroes of the Soviet Union. Otherwise, you can easily end up with “10 thousand Chechens who defended the Brest Fortress.” Most of the Caucasian data is a lie and rigging. Let's say that it is quite possible to draft 17 from the KCR to the Red Army. However, most of them are Russians and Cossacks, the number of Karachais did not exceed several hundred people. The call of persons of Caucasian nationalities was officially banned by the brilliant Dzhugashvili. On July 26, 1942, GKO Decree No. 2100ss announced a nationwide campaign to call "completely all citizens" born in 1924. A few days later, on July 30, the order of the NPO No. 0585 clarified: “to special instructions,” prohibit the draft of mountain representatives, that is, indigenous nationalities of Chechen-Ingushetia, Kabardino-Balkaria and Dagestan, as well as nationalities not called up for the Transcaucasus
        1. 0
          25 January 2019 13: 53
          Quote: rusin
          I would not advise you to trust the information of Caucasian historians about thousands of tortured Caucasians and hundreds of Heroes of the Soviet Union. Otherwise, you can easily end up with "10 thousand Chechens who defended the Brest Fortress."

          Of course, you are right.
          But the fact is that many CHILDREN were exiled and many of them died.
          1. +5
            25 January 2019 14: 48
            But the fact is that many CHILDREN were exiled and many of them died.

            Liberal facts speak of mass death. Other documents say this was not the case.
            Declassified documents of the NKVD on those killed during deportation are not accepted.
          2. +4
            25 January 2019 14: 53
            The devil is in the details.70 thousand were deported, 22 thousand of them died, this is nonsense or propaganda. Do not forget, the Caucasians were sent to sunny Kazakhstan, and the Russians and Cossacks to Siberia and the Urals, where there is really high mortality from hunger and cold (more than 600 thousand dead from 2.2 million deported).
            1. +3
              26 January 2019 08: 30
              In fairness, not all of Kazakhstan is sunny. Western, Eastern, northern and central Kazakhstan is far from a resort.
              1. +1
                26 January 2019 16: 18
                Quote: Steen
                In fairness, not all of Kazakhstan is sunny. Western, Eastern, northern and central Kazakhstan is far from a resort.

                But not Siberia. I come from East Kazakhstan, there in the open field both tomatoes and eggplant and much more ripens, unlike the same Siberia ...
        2. +2
          25 January 2019 20: 15
          Most likely, "the cancellation of the conscription of persons of the Caucasian nationalities" is another fake. Do you want to say that Georgians, Armenians and Azerbaijanis were not called up? And also Abkhazians, Adjarians and Dagestanis? But what about the famous Meliton Cantaria? Any references to orders marked "ss" do not add credibility to your statement. It is very similar to paid trolling, right according to the training manual. As for the conscription of the Chechens and Ingush, they could have been stopped after their mass desertion at the front. 24 year of birth was subject to conscription in 1942. By the way, the Crimean Tatars were not called in either - after the liberation of Crimea, they went to sunny Uzbekistan.
      2. 0
        25 January 2019 17: 15
        Sent 35 000 children of which 22 000 died
        - I do not believe...
      3. +5
        25 January 2019 20: 29
        Quote: Olgovich
        35 children were exiled, of whom 000 were killed.

        Do you have official documents confirming this, sir? Or is it cockroaches, in your head, at the rally, once again, consulted and decided ...
      4. +6
        25 January 2019 21: 29
        remember better about the children-Leningraders who died of starvation
      5. +1
        26 January 2019 16: 16
        Quote: Olgovich
        35 children were exiled, of whom 000 were killed.

        Well, about the number of victims, it’s clearly far-fetched, otherwise give a link to the source.
        As for the "exiled children", I understood you correctly that you would prefer to remove children from families and place them in orphanages?
      6. +2
        26 January 2019 16: 18
        Oh, do not lie uncle ... Check out the order of the Government of the USSR on measures to deport Kalmyks .. Well-appointed funds were allocated. They didn’t want to say so comfortably, but quite acceptable. Lifting facilities were allocated for each family. Upon arrival, funds were allocated for Every train was accompanied by doctors. And this is in a completely ruined country ..
      7. +1
        27 January 2019 00: 21
        And there is no reason for dad to rebel, to "partisan", to jackal among the Fritzes ... You'd better count how many children died at the hands of the Germans and their international henchmen!
    2. -8
      25 January 2019 10: 26
      Quote: XII Legion
      Some nations have established themselves as friends of the Wehrmacht.

      Exactly, exactly! Until 1991, a Soviet person in his application had to indicate whether his relatives were in the temporarily occupied territory! Half of the country until the 91st were "friends of the Wehrmacht"!
      1. +4
        25 January 2019 23: 28
        In what year were you born? And where did you mention relatives in the occupied territory until the year 91? I was born in the 47th year and have never seen such profiles in my eyes, although I have lived all my life in Moscow. I know that at the end of the war and the first years after it there was a similar practice, and this is understandable, but before the 91st year ... You believe that all the people on the site were born only after the 91st and don’t know a damn about life in THE USSR?
        Thanks to the authors for the interesting material. Here my colleagues advise me to write about Chechnya, and I join. That's really with whom we have mutual "love" forever. Write about everything so that the service does not seem like honey to Kadyrov. hi
        1. -4
          26 January 2019 06: 32
          Quote: Sea Cat
          I was born in the 47 year and have never seen such profiles in my eyes

          Well, this is personally your problem, I hope you do not consider yourself the whole Soviet people? Well, I wrote such a profile three times; to obtain a security clearance, to obtain a visa and to obtain permission to enter.
          Quote: Sea Cat
          Do you think that all the people on the site were born only after the 91 and don’t know a damn about life in the USSR?

          By no means, I believe that even those born in 47 do not know a damn thing about the USSR!
          Quote: Sea Cat
          Write about everything so that Kadyrov’s service doesn’t seem like honey.

          You are our grandfather, but you need to bow to Kadyrov’s legs, because Russian boys don’t give their heads in Chechnya !!! The eighth dozen on the horizon, but with a mind problem. Marasmus?
          1. +1
            26 January 2019 12: 02
            I do not consider myself "the entire Soviet people", at least the boorish part of it, to which you belong. And I am not "grandpa" to you, my child, there are no boors among my children. And bow to Kadyrov yourself, this is quite consistent with the boorish-slavish nature of lovers of the fist in the power structures. laughing
            1. +1
              27 January 2019 00: 26
              And for registration of admissions, and for registration of an officer's personal file, and for issuing visas for business trips and vacations abroad, I have never met a line about "occupation" or "service in the white army" ... It's not worth la-la about that that you know by hearsay, baby!
          2. +1
            26 January 2019 16: 23
            It was just foolish to ask a resident (birth) of the Urals or Siberia whether you were in acupuncture?
            In the BSSR, there has always been a question in serious questionnaires (when entering a university, at work):
            one of the relatives was in acupation
            one of the relatives was held captive
            one of the relatives was hijacked to Germany
            Personally, he filled out more than once, g / p 59.
            1. +2
              27 January 2019 00: 34
              I think this is some kind of local creativity. In principle, all questionnaires for tolerances, for personal files, etc. were unified. Perhaps old reserves remained somewhere, I remember when I saw a questionnaire filled with my grandfather when I was a kid, so yes, it was about the White Army (or I don’t remember the Civil War) and about the occupation. He drew attention because his grandfather wrote about his service in the Red Cossacks ... When I entered the physical-technical department and then filled out the tolerances, I had never met an occupation while serving in the Armed Forces.
              1. +1
                27 January 2019 00: 59
                We have one employee with permission was forced to write a letter of renunciation of his sibling when he moved to permanent residence in the states ...
                1. +2
                  27 January 2019 01: 00
                  It was - the line "relatives abroad"
      2. +1
        27 January 2019 20: 52
        Quote: Serg65
        full time, for sure! Until 1991, the Soviet man in his questionnaire had to indicate whether his relatives were in the temporarily occupied territory!

        I don’t remember temporarily occupied, but about relatives abroad - it was. It would not hurt now. That would be in the power of all having accounts and villas did not climb.
  4. +5
    25 January 2019 09: 23
    It was impossible to think of anything more to destabilize the already troubled regions than the return of the deported peoples ... Chechens, Karachais, Kalmyks, and Crimean Tatars ... EBN and the rest of the princelings and hetmanchiks laid "time bombs", or out of their own stupidity, or by following the directions. We'll find out later, if we find out. Under more democratic governments than Soviet power, they would have forgotten that such peoples existed. Rather, it was an act of mercy. Knowing about their art, the returning front-line soldiers would have knocked them out like rabid wolves ... I'm not sure how in the Caucasus, but in Crimea they would have let all Tatarva go under the knife. And it is not necessary to correct what I.V. had done, there was more intelligence in his empty smoking pipe than the current presidents and prime ministers. Thoughtful steps for years. But wisdom does not save you from traitors ...
  5. +2
    25 January 2019 14: 14
    Quote: 210ox
    Here I agree with you. National policy and administrative-cultural division are one of the reasons for the collapse of the Union.

    The pre-revolutionary division of the country in the province seems more thoughtful and balanced. And now we have republics and territories and regions and autonomy, the devil will break his leg. All sub, objects seem to be equal, but as we see some of them are more equal than others, one does not have to go far for examples. So we have an exacerbation of the friendship of peoples, which does not bode well in the long run.
    1. 0
      25 January 2019 17: 14
      Pre-revolutionary division of the country in the province seems more thoughtful and balanced
      - what?
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. +4
    25 January 2019 17: 20
    as one-sided - it is indicated how many were called, how many were awarded the GSS, but it did not indicate how many evaded the draft and deserted, how many participated in the German formations, and how many opposed the Soviet government ... hi
    1. 0
      27 January 2019 23: 50
      Moreover, the total number of these small nations is not indicated either in the first or in the second parts ... Well, to imagine the scale of the disaster ... I wonder why?
  8. +5
    25 January 2019 19: 21
    Remember, Sharapov. There is no punishment without guilt (s) hi
    1. +1
      26 January 2019 08: 54
      During the so-called gossip, over a million Cossacks were destroyed. Remember, Sharapov. There is no punishment without guilt (c).
      1. +1
        27 January 2019 00: 37
        The forest is being cut - the chips are flying! - Comrade Stalin said and puffed with a pipe ... By the way, it was Comrade Stalin who was the first to speak about the need for provincial division, in contrast to the "independent-autonomous" entities. And in Stalin, and in our time, you will not believe, the wisest of the wise gentlemen. Zhirinovsky!
      2. -1
        18 March 2019 18: 31
        When will you stop breach Cossack pigs? What the hell are "over a million Cossacks" if the total number of Cossacks in Ingushetia in 1917 was a little over 1 million people. At the same time, according to the 3 census in the North Caucasus Territory, 1926 million people declared belonging to the Cossack class ???
        1. 0
          18 March 2019 19: 22
          For you, a near creature, I’ll give a list of references: Voskoboinikov G. L. Cossacks in the First World War of 1914-1918. M., 1994; Galushko Yu. Cossack Troops of Russia. M., 1993; Gordeev A.A. History of the Cossacks. T. 1-4. M., 1991-1993; Don Cossacks in the past and present. Rostov-on-Don, 1998; Zheleznov I. I. Uraltsy: Essays on the life of the Ural Cossacks. T. 1-3. St. Petersburg, 1888; Zasedateleva L. B. Terek Cossacks. M., 1994; Kazin H.V. Cossack troops. St. Petersburg, 1912; Mukhin A., Pribylovsky V. Cossack movement in Russia and neighboring countries (1988-1994). T. 1-2. M., 1994; Ryzhkova N.V. For Faith, Fatherland and friends: Don Cossacks in the Great War of 1914-1917 Rostov-on-Don, 1998; Stanislavsky A. A. Civil war in Russia of the 1990th century: Cossacks at the turn of history. M., 1881; Khoroshkhin M. Cossack troops. St. Petersburg, 1; Yavornitsky D. I. Istoriya zaporozkih Cossacks. T. 3-1990. Kiev, 1993-XNUMX.
          But, given that you cannot master such a quantity of information, by virtue of your cretinism, I suggest extracting from the listed literature: On the eve of World War I, there were 11 Cossack Troops in the Russian Empire: Don (1,6 million people), Kuban (1,3, 260 million), Terskoye (40 thousand), Astrakhan (174 thousand), Ural (533 thousand), Orenburg (172 thousand), Siberian (45 thousand), Semirechenskoye (264 thousand), Trans-Baikal (50 thousand) .), Amur (35 thousand), Ussuri (2 thousand) and 65 separate Cossack regiments. They occupied 4,4 million acres of land with a population of 2,4 million people (480% of the total population of the empire), including 78 thousand service personnel. Among the Cossacks, Russians dominated nationally (17%), followed by Ukrainians (2%) and Buryats (XNUMX%). Most of the Cossacks professed Orthodoxy, there was a large percentage of Old Believers (especially in the Ural, Terek, Don Don).
  9. +2
    25 January 2019 20: 19
    Apparently the type of the most optimal national autonomy was found by the Americans for the Indians: they show their national identity by dancing at the wigwams. There is a full field of activity for the nationally concerned. In addition to the so-called. "cultural" autonomy - no more.
  10. -3
    26 January 2019 09: 53
    Criminal prosecution is necessary for the justification of the Stalinist repressions.
    1. 0
      27 January 2019 00: 39
      Extremist, you sort of, my friend! All would you plant yes plant ... Do you really live in a country of great and complete democracy such as the Baltic lands of the EU, but mabut on the happy land of the cathedral Ukraine?
      1. -1
        27 January 2019 14: 11
        Quote: LeonidL
        Extremist, you sort of, my friend! All would you plant yes plant

        Be sure to experience the camps on yourself.
        Quote: LeonidL
        Do you really live in a country of great and complete democracy such as the Baltic lands of the EU, but mabut on the happy land of the cathedral Ukraine?

        And besides these countries, you can’t offer anything? Because, in comparison with other countries, we will obviously lose in terms of living standards and democracy.
    2. -1
      27 January 2019 23: 59
      And I agree with you. But one still needs to bring to mind the idea of ​​Joseph Vissarionovich and restore historical justice. These small, but very proud ones couldn’t get along well in their historical homeland, so send them in small batches, and so that in a scatter without the possibility of contacting each other, throughout Russia. And in their historical homeland invite people from other regions.
    3. -1
      18 March 2019 18: 32
      Need criminal punishment for breeding people like you ...
  11. +2
    26 January 2019 23: 21
    They were all deported correctly.
    It’s a pity that they returned it later!
    1. +1
      27 January 2019 14: 13
      Quote: Albatroz
      They were all deported correctly.
      It’s a pity that they returned it later!

      Weak in the face of the Caucasians say this?
      1. -2
        28 January 2019 00: 01
        He spoke and then punished them for their sins. And they asked for forgiveness. Anything can happen.
        1. +1
          28 January 2019 18: 22
          Rambo keyboard?
          1. -2
            28 January 2019 18: 32
            Not for you to judge.
      2. -1
        18 March 2019 18: 33
        Are you Russ-Usruss, apparently a subculture of Kakazsky?
  12. -1
    18 March 2019 18: 23
    The committee even managed to proclaim the unification of Karachai and Balkaria into a "single Karachay" with the capital wherever you think - in Russian Kislovodsk! //// From 1922 to 1929 (de facto until 1934-36) Kislovodsk was the official center of Karachai. Only in 1929 did they begin to build Mikoyan-Shahar (then Klukhori, now Karachaevsk). KChAO was recreated not in February, but in January 1957.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. 0
      7 May 2020 19: 21
      Russian Kislovodsk? - yes, okay, you say too))
  13. -1
    18 March 2019 18: 25
    supporters of the independence of the so-called united Adyghe-Circassian-Balkarian republic. /// What the hell is this, gentlemen authors? Adygs = Circassians, and where does the Balkarians have to do with the Karachays? All the more so that the project of such a "republic" appeared to you when writing an article?
  14. 0
    27 March 2019 17: 51
    Dagestanis were called up and fought with dignity! Especially from the lowlands!
  15. 0
    7 May 2020 19: 19
    Nobody crossed the Russian side to the Wehrmacht. Fact.