Secrets of deportations. Part of 1. Ingush and Chechens

90
It is unlikely that anyone will argue that the current situation in interethnic relations in the North Caucasus is difficult, perhaps more than ever before. However, few people will remember that the sources of countless border disputes, tough conflicts between republics and individual ethnic groups go deep into history. Among the main reasons for the monstrous tension of the notorious Caucasian knot are the deportations of many North Caucasian peoples in the middle of the 1940s.

Despite the fact that already in the second half of 1950, a massive return of repressed Caucasian peoples to their native places took place, the consequences of those deportations continue to be felt in all spheres of their lives and their neighbors who have not been affected by the deportations. And we are talking not only about direct human losses, but also about moods, about the so-called social consciousness of both the repatriated people and their descendants.



Secrets of deportations. Part of 1. Ingush and Chechens


All this continues to play an important role in the formation of nationalist, and even frankly Russophobic aspirations in the Caucasus. And they, unfortunately, continue to cover not only the local community, but also the power structures of the local regions - regardless of their status, size and national composition of the population.

However, the then Soviet leadership resented not only and not so much undisguised anti-Sovietism of the overwhelming majority of Chechens, Ingushes, Nogais, Kalmyks, Karachais and Balkarians. With this, it could somehow come to terms, but almost everyone had to answer for direct cooperation with the Nazi occupiers. It was active for the benefit of the Reich that became the main reason for the deportations of that time.

Today, few people understand that in the 40s, the fact that deportations, as a rule, were accompanied by redistribution of administrative borders in the region, could not confuse anyone by definition. The introduction of “deported” regions, mainly the Russian population (local and from other regions of the RSFSR) and partly of other neighboring ethnic groups, was also considered the norm. Thus, they have always tried to erode the “anti-Russian” contingent, and at the same time significantly increase the proportion of the population loyal to Moscow.

Subsequently, with the return of thousands of deported locals on this ground, numerous ethnic conflicts occurred, which, as a rule, had to be suppressed by force, about which is slightly lower. In a broader context, the beginning of a long-term process of formation among the “returnees” themselves, and after them and their whole environment, attitudes towards the USSR and Russia as agents of “Russian imperial colonialism”, only slightly camouflaged under international politics, were actually initiated.

It is characteristic that the “Russian imperial colonialism” formula itself, in the 70 years of the last century, literally pulled out of its historical non-existence the head of the Chechen-Ingush editorial board of Radio Liberty Soserko (Syzorko) Malsagov. This native of the Terek region is a man of truly amazing fate. He managed to make war for both the white civilians and the Polish cavalry during World War II, managed to escape from the Solovki, and in the underground in France bore the characteristic nickname Kazbek. It is quite possible to call him one of the main fighters for the rights of repressed peoples.


Camp Memorial Kazbek - Soserko Malsagov

From the point of view of Malsagov, the assessment of the consequences of the deportation policy by the currently functioning Inter-Ethnic Committee on the conduct of the process against the policy of genocide is surprisingly corresponded. The commissaries, who were created together by the CIA and the intelligence services of the Federal Republic of Germany, did not hesitate to voice their position just at the time when there was a thaw in the USSR, and the return process was basically completed:
“Deportations for many peoples of the North Caucasus is an unhealing wound that does not have a statute of limitations. Moreover, the return of these peoples to the historical foci of their habitat was not accompanied by compensation for the tremendous deportation damage. Most likely, the Soviet leadership will continue to increase social and economic support to restored national autonomies in order to somehow smooth out the criminal activities of the deportation period. But the national-historical self-consciousness of the affected peoples will not forget what happened, the only guarantee from the repetition of which is their independence ”(1).


The problem of moods and sympathies for the Caucasus has never been easy. However, regarding the prevailing sympathies among the North Caucasian peoples to the Nazi invaders, the KGB of the USSR certificate sent to the presidium of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union in February 1956 is very characteristic. We give here only a short excerpt from it:
“... about half of the adult population of Chechens, Ingush, Balkarians, Karachais, Nogai and Kalmyks sympathized with the arrival of the invaders. Including over half of the deserters of the nationalities remaining in the region. The majority of deserters and a little more than a third of the adult male population, representing the same nationalities, entered the military, security units and administrative bodies formed by the invaders in the North Caucasus. ”


It was also indicated in the certificate that “During the war years, 15 Chechens and Ingush became Heroes of the Soviet Union, orders and medals were awarded more than 1700 to Chechen servicemen and Ingush soldiers. During the war, 2300 Chechens and Ingushs were killed in the ranks of the Red Army. The Chechen and Ingush servicemen, representatives of other peoples deported to 1944, responded from the front first to the labor armies, and after the war ended they were sent into exile to compatriots in remote regions of the country "(Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Volga-Vyatsky region, Urals, Trans-Urals).

However, it must be admitted that long before the deportations of the same Chechens and Ingush literally pushed into anti-Soviet ambitious, but absolutely naive appointees from the national policy from Moscow - the leaders of the regions. They did this by conducting, among other things, the notorious collectivization late, but at the same time so hastily and rudely that sometimes there was simply no one in the auls to take charge of the collective farms.

At the same time, the rights of believers, who were sometimes repressed even because they didn’t allow themselves to disperse anywhere at the wrong time, were violated everywhere. It could not fail to set up against the Soviet power and planting party committees everywhere, as if deliberately consisting of non-title party workers sent by Moscow for a given region of nationalities.

Is it any wonder that only in the territory of the Chechen-Ingush Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic over a decade and a half pre-war years, from 1927 to 1941, 12 of major armed uprisings occurred. According to the most modest estimates of the competent authorities, more than 18 thousand people participated in them in general. There were just hundreds of small skirmishes and shootouts, literally everything was fired and wherever it was possible to find weapon. Add to this for a more complete assessment of the very "sentiments and sympathies" of the frequent facts of economic sabotage, concealment of foreign intelligence agencies, the publication and distribution of anti-Soviet leaflets and literature.

When the war came to the Caucasus, as early as January 1942, an anti-Soviet "Party of Caucasian Brothers" was created in Chechen-Ingushetia under the auspices of the Abwehr and its Turkish colleagues (MITT). She united the representatives of 11 peoples of the region, and with the notorious exception of Russian and Russian speakers. The political declaration of this “party” proclaimed “the achievement of national independence, the struggle against Bolshevik barbarism, atheism and Russian despotism”. In June, 1942, this group was renamed with the participation of the German occupation authorities in the "National Socialist Party of Caucasian Brothers". Apparently, there was no longer any need to hide or somehow camouflage a direct connection with the NSDAP.

Another large anti-Soviet grouping in the territory of Chechen-Ingushetia was the Chechen-Gore National Socialist Organization created by the Abwehr in November 1941 of the year. Under the leadership of Mayrbek Sheripov, the former director of the Forest Council of the Chechen-Ingush Republic and the first deputy head of the Republican Planning Commission. Of course, before that - a member of the CPSU (b).

Identification and repression against the Soviet cadres, intelligence agents and underground fighters, demonstrative actions of “intimidation”, unbridled xenophobia, and especially Russophobia, forcing “voluntary” collection of values ​​for the German troops, etc. - business cards of both groups. In the spring of 1943, it was planned to unite them into a region-wide "Gorsko-Chechen Administration" under the control of the intelligence services of Germany and Turkey. However, the historic victory at Stalingrad soon led to the defeat of the invaders in the North Caucasus.

It is characteristic that throughout the entire period of partial occupation of the Caucasus, as indeed after that, Berlin and Ankara (although Turkey did not enter the war) vigorously vied for decisive influence in any puppet, but primarily Muslim or pro-Muslim groups both in the North Caucasus and in the Crimea. They even tried to influence the national autonomy of the Volga region, although in reality the hands reached out only to Kalmykia, as is well known, Buddhist.

One way or another, the aforementioned events and facts led to the decision of Moscow to deport Chechens and Ingushs as part of Operation Lentil 23-25 in February 1944 of the year. Although, taking into account the well-known ethno-confessional and psychological specifics of the Chechens and Ingush, it would be more expedient to thoroughly examine the situation in the Chechen-Ingush Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic during the war period. Moreover, bearing in mind the creation of the anti-Russian underground in Chechnya immediately after partial resettlement to other regions of Russia, supporters of Imam Shamil (in 1858-1862). But then the Kremlin preferred the “global” approach ...


Due to an acute shortage of documents, historians from different republics are still arguing over which deportation is depicted in a particular photo.

During the operation, about 650 thousands of Chechens and Ingush were evicted. During the eviction, transportation of deported - 177 echelons of freight cars - and in the first years after it (1944-1946 years) about 100 thousands of Chechens and almost 23 thousands of Ingush were killed - every fourth of both peoples. More than 80 thousand troops participated in this operation.

Instead of a dual Chechen-Ingush autonomy, the Grozny region was created (1944-1956) with the inclusion of a number of areas also former Kalmykia and several regions of Northern Dagestan, which ensured a direct outlet of this area to the Caspian Sea. A number of areas of the former Chechen-Ingushetia were then transferred to Dagestan and North Ossetia. And, although most of them later, in 1957-1961, were returned to the restored Chechen-Ingush Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic, other areas remaining in Dagestan (Aukhovsky) and North Ossetia (Prigorodny) still remain in conflict. The first is between Ingushetia and North Ossetia, the second between Chechnya and Dagestan.



At the same time, the Russian and Russian-speaking national elements were massively “infiltrating” into the Grozny region. This almost immediately led to a whole series of inter-ethnic clashes, most of the conflicts happened already at the end of the 50s. In the meantime, the post-Stalinist leadership of the country and fully updated local authorities for some reason believed that it was possible to moderate the political and psychological consequences of the deportation at the expense of the so-called sequestration. Sequestration of the rights and opportunities of local peoples, as well as by increasing the number of Russians and Russian speakers in the Chechen-Ingush Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic.

As a result, tensions only grew, and by the end of August 1958, in Grozny, military suppression of mass demonstrations was required. However, the Ingush or Chechen performances were not suppressed at all. It was firmly suppressed that the demonstrators of Russian and Ukrainian nationality, who dared to protest against their socio-economic and housing discrimination in comparison with the returned and returning Chechens and Ingushs, were decided.

Hundreds of demonstrators, blocking the building of the Chechen-Ingush Regional Committee of the CPSU, demanded that party officials should come to them and explain their policies in this region. But in vain: after several warnings, the troops were ordered to shoot to kill, and the "suppression" took place. Due to the use of military force in Grozny, more than 50 people died and went missing.

But the reason for the Russian demonstration was, as they say, literally on the surface. After all, in connection with the restoration of the Chechen-Ingush Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic in 1957, the Chechen-Ingush Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic began, without any justification for the fact of “returning,” to prescribe Russians and Ukrainians to the city’s apartments and rural houses. In addition, the latter were suddenly dismissed from their jobs and employed under worse conditions, including in other regions of the USSR, and in return - to provide freed up jobs to the Chechens and Ingush.

Excesses of the same orientation in Chechen-Ingushetia, although with a lower degree of confrontation, when there were no troops, occurred in 1963, 1973 and 1983. Workers and engineers of Russian nationality, of whom there was a majority, demanded equal pay for their labor and the same living conditions with Chechens and Ingush. Requirements had to at least partially satisfy.

Note:
1. “Free Caucasus” // Munich-London. 1961. No.7.
90 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +30
    14 January 2019 05: 54
    I read about the "introduction of the Russian national element" into the Grozny region.
    And about the transfer by Khrushchev of the Naur and Shelkov districts of the Stavropol Territory to Chechnya-Ingushetia in 1957 and by Lenin Nadterechny in 1921, he did not read anything. Strange article. Some details: www.jiteli-yuga.ru/sobytiya-i-fakty/na-stavropole-kazaki-prosyat-vernut-otdannye-chechne-zemli/
    1. +48
      14 January 2019 07: 25
      About much in the article is not mentioned consciously.
      Simply under the SOVIET AUTHORITY, these peoples began to live much better, more satisfying and with medicine, and the birth rate remained the same, and now they have bred. In the North Caucasus, contempt for labor has been cultivated until now, so they began to bandit to the extent of their understanding, listening to about abreks and other cattle stealers. Moreover, clan traditions contributed * to the division of labor *, some robbed and killed, others sold stolen goods, others fed, whom they shoved into power structures * covered * relatives - bandits.
      And the worst thing is the confidence * of small but proud * peoples that they will not be touched. It is the tradition of the Anglo-Saxons to cut out any dissent in the most atrocious ways.
      Even in the RUSSIAN EMPIRE all these bandits were forgiven and tried to make sane, then they nursed in the SOVIET UNION.
      It is difficult to judge the RUSSIAN EMPIRE and the SOVIET AUTHORITY for leniency in relation to bandits and members of their families. But this gives rise to confidence in impunity.
      1. +29
        14 January 2019 08: 13
        Quote: Alexey Podymov, Artyom Alekseev
        During the operation, about 650 thousand Chechens and Ingush were evicted. During the eviction, transportation of the deported - 177 trains of freight cars - and in the first years after it (1944-1946), approximately 100 thousand Chechens and almost 23 thousand Ingushs died
        The figure is so absurdly untrue that I decided to check where it came from. It turned out - from Wikipedia. Not good. Serious, even the smallest, people in such cases do not use pedias. Wikipedia in its meaning is an unreliable source. Kadyrov, for example, said that as many as 54% of the entire population died during the resettlement. However, it is not. During the deportation, about 1.250 Ingush and Chechens died, another 50 were shot in excesses. By January 1.01.1953, 90, the total number of evicted Chechens and Ingush decreased by 33 thousand, BUT 7 thousand from this figure should be excluded as double-counted, another 50 thousand were released. Those. the total number of deported Chechens and Ingush decreased by XNUMX thousand people. These figures, with references to the GARF, are given in the book of the military historian I. Pykhalov "Why did Stalin evict the peoples". Whether they all died there, or someone escaped, or evaded the census is a question. Later this population began to grow there.
      2. -17
        14 January 2019 09: 00
        Quote: Vasily50
        And the worst thing is the confidence * of small but proud * peoples that they are not touched. It is the tradition of the Anglo-Saxons to cut out any dissent in the most atrocious ways.
        More in the RUSSIAN EMPIRE of all these bandits forgiven and tried to make sane, then nursed in the Soviet Union.

        It is categorically impossible to call entire nations bandits.
        Only the court determines who specifically is the perpetrator.
        1. +16
          14 January 2019 09: 21
          It is categorically impossible to call entire nations bandits.

          Of course, you are saying the right thing, but historical realities must be taken into account.
          At one time, the Vainakh people divided into Chechens and Ingush. And why?
          But because part of the people accepted the demand of the Russian Tsar (Ingush): to live in peace with neighbors, to stop engaging in robberies and robberies, raids on neighboring villages. And the other part (the Chechens) said that they would live as before. Thus, the people were divided into two parts, and the Chechens had a saying "Worse than the Ingush.", And the Caucasian War began.
          1. +5
            14 January 2019 11: 24
            Quote: glory1974
            Of course, you are saying the right thing, but historical realities must be taken into account.

            the realities are such that many tens of thousands of war criminals (deserters, defectors, traitors, prolitsaev, etc.) from these peoples did not answer under wartime laws for their crimes. but just .... left for the settlement. belay

            Russian for the same things-shot and imprisoned mercilessly.
            .
            But not convicted, then innocent. This is normal?
            1. +29
              14 January 2019 13: 39
              Quote: Olgovich
              the realities are such that many tens of thousands of war criminals (deserters, defectors, traitors, prolitsaev, etc.) from these peoples did not answer according to the laws of the war for their crimes. but just .... left for the settlement.

              Russian for the same things-shot and imprisoned mercilessly.

              Something I don’t understand, Olgovich. Either you lament over the billions of repressed enemies of the people, or you advocate the execution of the lion's share of adult men of an entire ethnic group ...

              During the three years of the war, 49 Chechens and Ingush deserted from the ranks of the Red Army, another 362 declined to draft, which totals 13 people. He died on the fronts and went missing (and the latter include those who went over to the enemy), just 389 people. The twice-smaller Buryat people, which the German occupation did not threaten, lost 62751 thousand people at the front, and the Ossetians, who were one and a half times inferior to Chechens and Ingush, lost almost 2300 thousand. At the same time that the decree on resettlement was published, only 13 Chechens, Ingush and Balkars were in the army.

              If the Soviet regime acted according to the law, then 62751 people would have to be shot. The very existence of the Chechens would be in question. This time. And secondly, you are the first to vote on the brutality of the Soviets.
              1. -4
                15 January 2019 09: 05
                Quote: McAr
                Something I don’t understand, Olgovich. Either you lament over the billions of repressed enemies of the people, or you advocate the execution of the lion's share of adult men of an entire ethnic group ...

                I stand for the LAWcommon to all and everyone.
                If a person is a deserter, a defector is put on trial and against the wall. What difference is he Russian or Jewish? What is incomprehensible to you?
                Tens of thousands of traitors deported - AVOID this deserved punishment. Do you think this is normal?
                But thousands of children who did not commit anything died on the way and exile.
                Quote: McAr
                If the Soviet regime acted according to the law, then 62751 people would have to be shot. The very existence of the Chechens would be in question. This time

                Russian traitors were shot an order of magnitude more and there are no laws on repressed peoples about them. Because, according to the LAW, there are no complaints and cannot be. This time.
                Quote: McAr
                And secondly, you are the first to vote on the brutality of the Soviets.

                belay fool
                What a fright? The convicted traitor was to receive a deserved punishment, regardless of nationality. But NOT received, but lived a quiet life. Absurd. The absurdity of your system of lawlessness.
                1. +4
                  15 January 2019 09: 25
                  Quote: Olgovich
                  I stand for the LAW, the same for everyone and everyone.

                  What class are you advocating for? The right is the will of the ruling class elevated to the law.

                  Yes, by law, deserters and traitors were subject to execution. But their Soviet power regretted, because it could be fatal for an entire ethnic group.

                  I categorically agree with you - the Soviet regime was sometimes humane to the point of stupidity. I regretted too many. Therefore, the counter-revolution of the 90s happened, a rollback. And now we, as a country, are doomed to trail in the tail of civilization and progress "eating up" the remnants of what was done in the Soviet era.
                  1. 0
                    15 January 2019 14: 40
                    Quote: McAr
                    What class are you advocating for?

                    you speak in some other language: in the USSR there was a single Legislation for ALL citizens, providing for liability for treason.
                    Quote: McAr
                    Yes, by law, deserters and traitors were subject to execution. But their Soviet power regretted, because it could be fatal for the whole ethnic group.

                    Yeah, she "pitied" the traitors, but thousands of exiled children did not. fool

                    Your invention is not interested: There is no such document.

                    And by the way, there was nothing fatal: in thousands of Russian villages, almost no one returned from men at all.
                    Quote: McAr
                    I strongly agree with you - the Soviet government was sometimes stupidly humane. I regretted too many. That's why the counter-revolution of the 90s happened, a rollback.


                    And how much more did you need to clean, for complete happiness?
                    And so they cleared as much as nobody, never and nowhere. And all a little .... request
      3. +1
        14 January 2019 11: 13
        Quote: Vasily50
        It is difficult to judge the RUSSIAN EMPIRE and the SOVIET AUTHORITY for leniency in relation to bandits and members of their families. But this gives rise to confidence in impunity.

        How ?! How, something is not so, remember the Russian Empire! Well, I’m reluctant to answer for ourselves! Well, let's say a few words about the North Caucasus during the Russian Empire. Office work was carried out both in Russian and in Arabic. The Russian administration of the Caucasus did not try to Russify and Christianize. However, the leadership was precisely Russian. Customs were preserved by opening national schools. However, historical contradictions between the Cossacks and the mountaineers remained. And after Shamil's defeat, muridism did not disappear completely. The population of the North Caucasus grew, which exacerbated the land issue. The Bolsheviks later played on this. However, until 1917, the process remained completely controlled. In 1917, after the February events in Chechnya and Dagestan, their own spiritual leaders appeared. The fall of the autocracy was instantly perceived as a signal for anti-Russian sentiments. In October, 170 Russian, Moldavian and German settlements in Northern Dagestan are destroyed. The 1917 coup is not recognized by the Terek and Kuban Cossacks. But most of the highlanders take a bang! Even a part of the Muslim clergy is getting up under the flattering Bolshevik slogans about the transfer of land and autonomy. Already in 1918, 4 Cossack villages of Sunzha were evicted and their land was transferred to the Ingush. In Ossetia, under the Bolshevik leadership, a group "Kermen" is organized, demanding the transfer of the Cossack land to the mountain poor. The Chechens and Ingush supported the Bolsheviks very actively out of a desire to put an end to the Terek Cossacks, their old enemies. Imam Uzun Haji Saltinsky calls on the Dagestani peoples to cooperate with the Bolsheviks. For the sake of fairness, it must be said that the mountain nobility mostly supported the white movement. She fought in Denikin's volunteer army, the week's regiment and the Karachai division. However, it was the Bolsheviks who carried out a real genocide of the Cossacks, who gave promises to distribute lands and autonomies to anyone and in any way, that massive support from the Caucasians was provided. So dhikr danced under red banners, gentlemen! However, as usual with the communists, to promise does not mean to marry! The reliance on the national outskirts and the distribution of elephants to the aborigines ended as soon as the Bolsheviks felt more confident. Already in 1920, representatives of the Sharia monarchy were shot and the mountain tale ended! The redistribution and redrawing of borders began ... In contrast to the Russian Empire, local supporters of the Bolsheviks were introduced into the leadership of the new formations, but this no longer saves the situation. Highlanders feel betrayed by their "best" feelings. Then it happens as it is written in the article. The only thing I want to add is that many Caucasians and other representatives of the peoples, such as the Crimean Tatars, really fought heroically in the Red Army. Were heroes of the Soviet Union and order bearers. Most were on the other side. but why was it necessary to evict indiscriminately ?! The principle of collective responsibility? Well, this is what these principles lead to!
      4. +16
        14 January 2019 12: 42
        Quote: Vasily50
        About much in the article is not mentioned consciously.
        Simply under the SOVIET AUTHORITY, these peoples began to live much better, more satisfying and with medicine, and the birth rate remained the same, and now they have bred. In the North Caucasus, contempt for labor has been cultivated until now, so they began to bandit to the extent of their understanding, listening to about abreks and other cattle stealers. Moreover, clan traditions contributed * to the division of labor *, some robbed and killed, others sold stolen goods, others fed, whom they shoved into power structures * covered * relatives - bandits.

        Akhedzhakova would obviously not agree with you if she read the article, then there would be no limit to the flow of tearful remorse. crying
        And now a rhetorical question: a terrible war is going on, and the Headquarters, instead of sending a whole army to the front, throws it on Operation Lentil. The same can be said about hundreds of echelons, which, oh, how awaited the fronts with food, ammunition, military equipment ... Did the Stavka act like that from a good life?
        Rhetorical answer: in order to do away with the "partisans" ("forest brothers", Bandera, Caucasian gangs ...) in their rear, it is necessary to deprive them of the support of the population. To do this, the population must be eliminated. The Germans did it literally - they burned out entire areas (in Belarus, for example). there is human way - This population (the Baltic states, Zapadentsev, Chechens, Ingush ...) to relocate. That’s the whole answer, there’s no third. Of course, a lot of firewood was broken thenbut, as Zhiglov said, there is no punishment without guilt.
        1. -17
          14 January 2019 18: 54
          "Of course a lot of firewood was broken then" - such an expert sits on a warm sofa, conventionally, with a bottle of beer and talks about firewood. You would be in this meat grinder and so that in the end, your children and your relatives would almost die somewhere in the Kazakh steppe ... that would then be said.
          1. +3
            18 January 2019 22: 07
            Quote: Rodo
            You would be in this meat grinder and so that in the end you’ll almost die somewhere in the Kazakhstan steppe and your children and relatives .... that’s then they would say.

            If Rodo is quiet and meek, but his brother, brother-in-law and father are bandit, they are members of an underground terrorist organization, and the state is fighting, and it is necessary to put out the fire and not understand at first who struck a match, there is no time and effort. That is in the interests of the state, and its citizens, the entire Rodo family must be punished. Relocate, let the filth die in the Kazakh steppe. Not a great loss. The interests of honest citizens and the state are more important. Joint responsibility. The practice of modern Israel. They speak quite effectively. Tear down the house of a terrorist family with a bulldozer. Let relatives live on the street.
      5. -17
        14 January 2019 17: 19
        So let them live on their own. Why are you touching them for almost two centuries, "benefactors" are worthless.
        1. +8
          14 January 2019 18: 43
          Quote: Rodo
          So let them live on their own. Why are you touching them for almost two centuries, "benefactors" are worthless.

          "Iron logic" good drinks If in History every tribe that covered its causal place with a fig leaf was not touched, then there would be no states. This is elementary dialectics. Then tell me who should "touch" these small nations (Avars, Lezgins, Kumyks, Nogays and others ...). Give everyone statehood? - then Luxembourg will appear giant state... Or let other powers "touch"? Or what do you want to say with your populist post? request
          1. -22
            14 January 2019 18: 49
            You have already benefited the northern peoples. Half succeeded half scattered. Most of all outraged by this "benefactor", "we are brothers" "we are one people" and other crap. There was an empire and now the next king is dreaming of it. But other nations don't want such a "friendship." Hard to understand?
            1. Alf
              +11
              14 January 2019 19: 49
              Quote: Rodo
              There was an empire and now the next king is dreaming of it. But other nations don't want such a "friendship."

              Well, the Chechens do not want to enter the empire. Question- And what, then, are small but proud people doing in Russia? And not one and not two ..
              1. -9
                17 January 2019 12: 02
                Well, we would make a full-fledged border with them and everyone, and let them live as they can. But for Mr Putin, this was not acceptable. And this is the fault of his imperial aspirations. It would be better to "raise from his knees" the country not in wars but in the economy, otherwise what territory is not developed at all as in the still Soviet joke "with a bare ass but with a club."
                1. Alf
                  +4
                  17 January 2019 18: 55
                  Quote: Rodo
                  Well, they would make a full border with them and that’s all and let them live as they can.

                  So that tomorrow "our partners" would appear on this border?
            2. +5
              17 January 2019 12: 05
              Quote: Rodo
              You have already benefited the northern peoples. Half succeeded half scattered. Most of all outraged by this "benefactor", "we are brothers" "we are one people" and other crap. There was an empire and now the next king is dreaming of it. But other nations don't want such a "friendship." Hard to understand?
              -you tell the Irish or the Basques ... They were persuaded by a little other states, "DO NOT scatter in different directions !!!!!!" ....
              1. -7
                17 January 2019 12: 13
                I'm already tired of writing)) They did not try to seem like "benefactors" and when others do not recognize something else and take offense at it))
                1. +2
                  17 January 2019 12: 33
                  Quote: Rodo
                  I'm already tired of writing)) They did not try to seem like "benefactors" and when others do not recognize something else and take offense at it))
                  -those. had to do as they in Ulster for example? I jerked-plopped and that's it?
                  1. -7
                    17 January 2019 12: 37
                    You do not hear, but rather do not want. They were invaders I do not argue. But friendship, etc. did not hide behind))
                  2. -7
                    17 January 2019 12: 39
                    And what about the uprising in the Ross Empire that was not crushed with that blood? No? The same Suvorov was now poured with blood by the Belarusian lands. So all empires are the same.
        2. +12
          14 January 2019 21: 26
          Well, how would they be the first to start "touching" the Slavs. Rides, robberies, murders ... This had to be severely stopped. The Caucasus does not understand persuasion, only force. You still start to mourn the Crimean Khanate with its raiding economy based on robbery and slave trade. What, it was necessary to "understand, forgive and let go"? "They lived like this for centuries, it is customary for them ..." Well, let them rob each other, cutting out whole auls. No, they considered the Russians "legitimate prey"! what they got ...
          1. -9
            17 January 2019 12: 05
            But the Slavs did not engage in the slave trade?))) Then everyone did it). I wrote that they would set a border and let themselves cook .... but there is oil !!! That’s the trouble. but how to give it? ... So?
        3. +8
          14 January 2019 22: 56
          Quote: Rodo
          So let them live on their own. Why are you touching them for almost two centuries, "benefactors" are worthless.

          I will tell you how your other "benefactors" disposed of the nations.
          Kuchins, Koyukons, Ingaliks, Tanana, Tanana, Heavenly, Atna, Slavey, Tlicco, Chipewayan, Part Cree, Inna, Hurons, Iroquois, Ojibwe, Ottawa, Miami, Mohicans, Delaware, Shauni, Cherokee, Choctaw, Chicasche Natchez, Screams, Seminole, Cheyenne, Comanche, Pawnee, Sioux, Arapaho, Kiowa, Tlingit, Tsimshian, Haida, Nutka, Quakiutli, Coastal Salishi, Apaches, Navajo, Pueblo, Hopi, Zuni, Pima, Papago ...
          Where are these nations? - do not tell? The Nazis in Belarus are just resting! Continue to sigh on your idols of the Anglo-Sakts more ...
          1. -8
            17 January 2019 12: 07
            I agree. Only the Anglo-Saxons did not climb with "friendship" and "brothers")) And where is Belarus?
            1. +3
              20 January 2019 03: 14
              I am always surprised by ghouls who write and think in Russian, but who hates everything Russian! My tseeuropeets!
      6. 0
        15 January 2019 18: 01
        Of course, I wildly apologize, but in the late 80s and early 90s Chechens were the best builders. But on Rublevka I know a couple of sites where our owner fluctuated and decided through cops without paying honestly earned money! Burned to ashes! Most importantly, turnkey fully finished houses. And stupidly because of redneckness, the issue price for the owner was about 5 pieces of killed raccoons. But to give an item to the cops seemed to them a cheaper option.
        P.S. Under Tsar Shamil, they accepted and did not build their rules there in the Caucasus. Well, the author correctly noticed the Russification attempt failed. And the resettlement of the Orthodox in the houses of the evicts is generally nonsense. How is it in the bible? Do not wish your neighbor's wife? Well, where are the ancestors of the people who lived there for centuries, it's just an automatic device of murder in the future!
        P.S. By the way, in western Ukraine they also evicted entire villages. Therefore, the attitude is sensitive.
        1. -5
          17 January 2019 12: 08
          Well, at least one sober look.
      7. -2
        21 January 2019 02: 59
        Quote: Vasily50
        About much in the article is not mentioned consciously.
        Simply under the SOVIET AUTHORITY, these peoples began to live much better, more satisfying and with medicine, and the birth rate remained the same, and now they have bred. In the North Caucasus, contempt for labor has been cultivated until now, so they began to bandit to the extent of their understanding, listening to about abreks and other cattle stealers. Moreover, clan traditions contributed * to the division of labor *, some robbed and killed, others sold stolen goods, others fed, whom they shoved into power structures * covered * relatives - bandits.
        And the worst thing is the confidence * of small but proud * peoples that they will not be touched. It is the tradition of the Anglo-Saxons to cut out any dissent in the most atrocious ways.
        Even in the RUSSIAN EMPIRE all these bandits were forgiven and tried to make sane, then they nursed in the SOVIET UNION.
        It is difficult to judge the RUSSIAN EMPIRE and the SOVIET AUTHORITY for leniency in relation to bandits and members of their families. But this gives rise to confidence in impunity.

        Russia will disintegrate as well as the USSR. A matter of time +48 pluses to such nonsense, just a matter of time. And the Russians will do it the same way as it did with the USSR.
  2. +23
    14 January 2019 06: 31
    The period before the war, some fragments during the war is very poorly shown. The article is superficial. It’s necessary to give material stronger and larger, such as -
    - Mass desertion of Chechens and Ingush: in just three years of World War II, 49362 Chechens and Ingush defected from the ranks of the Red Army, and 13389 “valiant highlanders” evaded the draft (Chuyev S. North Caucasus 1941-1945. War in the rear. No. 2002).
    For example: at the beginning of 1942, when creating a national division, only 50% personnel could be called up.
    In total, about 10 thousands of Chechens and Ingushs served honestly in the Red Army, thousands of people died and went missing. And more than 2,3, thousands of their relatives evaded the fulfillment of military duty.
    1. -22
      14 January 2019 17: 21
      What "duty"? )) Before whom?
  3. VS
    -4
    14 January 2019 06: 39
    Quote: Nikolai S.
    Strange article.


    not that word(((

    The author writes - "" It was the active work for the good of the Reich that became the main reason for the then deportations. ""

    Everything seems to be correct - they wrote in the documents - we are relocating because these peoples actively cooperated with the Germans!
    BUT!
    The Kalmyks and other Chechens began to evict - AFTER the territories where the Germans didn’t really see it in their eyes - AFTER LIBERATION of these territories and ONLY some peoples of the Caucasus were evicted!
    And nokhchi were practically not under occupation ..

    Those. the main reason is not that the Nokhchi "collaborated" with the Germans. For such reasons, it was necessary to evict ALL zapadentsev after the liberation of the territories of Western Ukraine, but nobody did THIS!
    Yes, among the Nakhchis, HALF of their conscripts went to the mountains with deserters and banditry in the mountains, killing primarily the same wounded in hospitals, or stupidly stayed in their distant villages, but HALF honestly fought in the Red Army and the CA!
    The authors themselves indicated the reasons for the eviction but did not understand the main thing - why it happened AFTER the Germans were expelled from the Caucasus))

    It's simple - it's not so much about "cooperation" with the Germans, but rather with the intelligence services of Germany and Turkey of individual nations. Other nations in the Caucasus also hunted this, and there are dozens of them)))

    But at THAT moment, it DIDN'T PROVE among the Nokhchi - AMONG their "elite" - those who could stop their shaitans !!! Well, there was no Kadyrovs among the Nokhchi at that time !!
    In other nations, their elders gave guarantees that the bandits and deserters in the mountains would be neutralized by these nations themselves, and at THAT moment there were no such authorities among the Nokhchi! It turned out that among the "elite" of Nokhchi at that time there were just accomplices of bandits and deserters - because they were also relatives !!!

    And what the authors did not show - WHY the eviction was AFTER the Germans left, and despite the fact that the Germans were really agents - Abwehr employees were arrested the same .. And everything is simple - the region was OILY !!
    On the way to Rostov, oil products went to central Russia. There was ALWAYS OIL processing in Grozny and it was OIL that was the main reason for the eviction !!! That THIS could not risk in Moscow in those days !!!
    It was easier to evict the civilian population - the feed base of the militants - who even caught a part of the German agents - were dangerous in those days !!!

    Well, the explanation in the official docks that they are being evicted for "cooperation" with the Germans - nothing more than the lyrics of the war days - for the edification of others - that they were still under the occupation of the Germans and actively collaborated with them ..

    But when the Germans left the whole territory of the SSR, NO people really ACTIVELY collaborated with the Germans, etc. - DID NOT RESUME AT ALL !!!
    Those. THE MAIN reason for the eviction of CERTAIN Caucasian peoples is the OIL of the Caucasus and the fact that certain peoples did not have their own Kadyrovs - capable of pacifying their shaitans ..
  4. -9
    14 January 2019 07: 00
    During the operation, about 650 thousand Chechens and Ingush were evicted. During the eviction, transportation of the deported - 177 trains of freight cars - and in the first years after it (1944-1946) Killed about 100 thousand Chechens and almost 23 thousand Ingush - every fourth of both nations.

    Thus, ten thousand real war criminals were released from court and execution, limited to only exile, and they died mainly during the resettlement, not they, but innocent children and women. this is precisely what they cannot forgive. And there would be a trial and punishment of SPECIFIC criminals, and today there would be no grievances or problems of the resettled peoples.

    It was decided to suppress severely the demonstrators of Russian and Ukrainian nationality, who dared to protest against their socio-economic and housing discrimination in comparison with the returning and returning Chechens and Ingush.

    The thoughtless, rude national policy that led to the exodus of the Russian population from the Caucasus already tens of thousands fled, then continued into the 90s.

    But before the Thief there was the Terek region, where it developed quietly and powerfully, the Russian population grew in a fairly peaceful existence with local peoples. who were involved in the general life and interests of the Empire.

    Who now remembers that only a hundred years ago, in Chechnya there was a powerful Russian Chechnya, destroyed in favor of the Red Highlanders?
    1. Alf
      +3
      14 January 2019 19: 51
      Quote: Olgovich
      And there would be a trial and punishment of SPECIFIC criminals, and today there would be no grievances or problems of the resettled peoples.

      And the peoples themselves would not have been.
  5. +5
    14 January 2019 07: 58
    it’s a pity that little was destroyed, well, very little.
  6. +14
    14 January 2019 08: 01

    Due to an acute shortage of documents, historians from different republics are still arguing over which deportation is depicted in a particular photo.
    And why not attract experts? In the bottom picture, the ZIL-164 car is clearly and clearly visible. Beginning of production October 1957, it is clearly different
    from ZiS-150 which had horizontal bars of a radiator facing. Commentators wrote about the strangeness of the article
    1. +8
      14 January 2019 08: 41
      Yes, the author didn’t get the picture from the photo - even if it is ZiS-150, then it was released only from 1947 of the year, and the main deportations - 1944 of the year.
    2. +5
      14 January 2019 10: 29
      The third car is similar to the Gas 51. The beginning of the release of 1946-1947. And the first one in my opinion is definitely Zil 164.
      1. +7
        14 January 2019 12: 23
        Quote: Blacksmith 55
        The third car is similar to the Gas 51.

        Quote: Blacksmith 55
        The third car is similar to the Gas 51.

        This is exactly Gas-51, and the release after the restoration of the Zaporizhzhya Metallurgical Plant, before that, the Gas-51 was released with a wooden cabin, since only this plant produced a thin sheet for the automotive industry.

        Such machines were produced sometime until the mid-1950s.
    3. +1
      17 January 2019 15: 40
      Quote: Amurets
      And why not attract experts? In the bottom picture, the ZIL-164 car is clearly and clearly visible. Beginning of production October 1957, it is clearly different

      from ZiS-150 which had horizontal bars of a radiator facing. Commentators wrote about the strangeness of the article


      It is true that the first was the ZIL-164, followed by the ZIS-150 (or his “dad” International KR11, which is unlikely), and the third is the GAZ-63 with a straight grille. That is, the freshest of them is ZIL-164 not earlier than 1957 release.
      1. +1
        17 January 2019 16: 15
        Quote: DimerVladimer
        behind him ZIS-150 (or his "dad" International KR11

        Quite possibly.
  7. 0
    14 January 2019 08: 54
    To put it bluntly, the decision on deportation was made by two Georgians. Why did it cause not Georgian-but Russophobia?
  8. +15
    14 January 2019 08: 54
    About the Kalmyks, who also fell under deportation: it seems that the situation here is the same as with the Volga Germans, who were not under occupation, but went anyway. There was a provocation by the NKVD, when a false fascist reconnaissance group was thrown to them (the Germans), about which the local population chose not to report to the authorities. So they all set off. And more about deportation. These were the Sudeten Germans, for whose "protection" from bad Czechs Hitler occupied Czechoslovakia in 1938. And no return to the "ancestral lands" for these "innocent repressed" has been and never will be. And Khrushch rehabilitated all our accomplices. And in general, Khrushch Kukuruzny is a worthy forerunner of hump - wherever you look - everywhere the problems he created, the same 1956 protocol on the agreement with Japs, for example.
    1. +1
      14 January 2019 10: 36
      I did not hear about a provocation in the Volga Germans Republic. But ... a decision was made, and the eviction would have happened anyway.
    2. -15
      14 January 2019 11: 13
      Quote: Aviator_
      And more about deportation. These were the Sudeten Germans, for whose "protection" from bad Czechs Hitler occupied Czechoslovakia in 1938. And no return to the "ancestral lands" for these "innocent repressed" has been and will not be.

      Germany lost the war. Repressed peoples, what war lost?
      1. +4
        14 January 2019 22: 50
        Repressed peoples fought against those not. For which they got what they deserved.
        1. -3
          15 January 2019 09: 15
          Quote: Aviator_
          Repressed peoples fought against those not. For which they got what they deserved.

          NO such punishment for whole peoples in the world. You do not understand what you are preaching?
          1. +3
            15 January 2019 09: 30
            With sermons - to church and synagogue, this is not for me. There is punishment for peoples. An example is the Sudeten Germans. If Hitler had not received the Skoda and CheZet factories in 1938, he would have had nothing to start WWII with, this is the fault of the Sudeten Germans. They bought into the slogans of National Socialism and they were punished. This is called "collective responsibility". As you can see, the West can do this, but for some reason we cannot.
            1. -3
              15 January 2019 14: 54
              Quote: Aviator_
              With sermons - to the church and synagogue, this is not for me
              You did it.
              Quote: Aviator_
              For peoples, there is punishment. An example is the Sudeten Germans.

              there is no such example. Sudeten Germans accepted German citizenship .
              Germany lost her граждане suffered all the hardships of defeating their country. And not only in the Sudetenland, but throughout the entire territory of Germany.

              I ask again: the citizens of the USSR-winner (Kalmyks, etc.): to whom did they lose?
              1. +1
                15 January 2019 19: 34
                I answer again: the accomplices received a punishment, perhaps too lenient. Kalmyks did not try too hard, to put it mildly, for the USSR to win. At work, I had a man who survived the domestic war as a child in Astrakhan. He said that Kalmyk sonderkommandy terrorized the population of the surrounding area, acting in raids (there was no solid front line on the lower Volga). I mentioned Sudeten Germans insofar as they lost their homeland, and forever.
                1. -5
                  16 January 2019 07: 54
                  Quote: Aviator_

                  I answer again: accomplices received a punishment, perhaps too lenient.

                  Once again: specific military offenders, traitors -DID NOT GET PUNISHMENTS for treason. We left for the settlement, instead of the gallows.
                  no people were ever recognized and could not be.
                  Quote: Aviator_
                  He said that Kalmyk Sonderkommands terrified the population

                  Kalmyk exiled children, including infants, also raided?
                  1. +3
                    16 January 2019 09: 04
                    In-in, it's high time to cry about the teardrop of the exiled child. I explain for the gifted: there was no time to conduct an investigation, to judge and shoot all specific members of the Sonderkommando. Although there were those who were caught with weapons in their hands, they did not go anywhere, but stood up to the wall. This is a collective responsibility that even Japanese with US citizenship felt on themselves in 1941, even emigrants from Germany to the United States, such as the famous atomic scientist Klaus Fuchs, who also sat down in 1941, and was pulled out of the American special settlement only to work on project "alloy tubes".
                    1. 0
                      16 January 2019 11: 57
                      Quote: Aviator_
                      I explain for the gifted: to conduct an investigation, to judge and shoot all the specific participants of the Sonderkommando - I had no time.

                      Nonsense: in ALL territories liberated from the invaders, they immediately searched for, tried and hanged up traitors.
                      1. +4
                        16 January 2019 18: 58
                        And what about their family members, who betrayed partisans and underground fighters, and also fed and took care of their policemen? There is such a medical fact: when Amet-Khan Sultan received the Hero of the Soviet Union, a group of Crimean partisans was sent to his family in Alupka in order to take the Hero's relatives to the mainland. The partisans barely carried off their feet, since the relatives of Amet-Khan Sultan served in the Sonderkommando. (Sermul, "900 days in the mountains of Crimea", Simferopol, 2003). Here are the accomplices and went to the east. There was nothing to bring them back from there.
                      2. -3
                        17 January 2019 09: 35
                        Quote: Aviator_

                        And their family members,

                        And family members were not expelled.
                      3. +1
                        17 January 2019 19: 39
                        You are too naive. Read the sources.
          2. +2
            17 January 2019 12: 13
            Quote: Olgovich
            There is NO such punishment for entire nations in the world. You do not understand what you are preaching?
            - lol
            US Japanese citizens
            Everything was fun there, and even more so. Especially with property and money in the accounts ... Capitalism ..
          3. +1
            17 January 2019 22: 08
            Tell Japam in the mattress of the Second World War, when they were all driven into concentration camps!
  9. VS
    +1
    14 January 2019 11: 13
    Quote: Nonna
    in early 1942, with the creation of the national division, only 50% of the personnel were recruited.
    In total, about 10 thousands of Chechens and Ingushs served honestly in the Red Army, thousands of people died and went missing. And more than 2,3, thousands of their relatives evaded the fulfillment of military duty.

    1st — instead of the planned national cavalry division that was created in ALL the republics of the Caucasus in those days — 255 Chechen-Ingush regiment was created which then died under Stalingrad in August 42. completely died heroically ...
    2 nd - of all the drafted HALF deserted and not these 60 to 10 thousand ..
    1. +4
      15 January 2019 17: 28
      Quote: V.S.
      instead of the planned national cavalry division that was created in those days in all republics of the Caucasus, 255 Chechen-Ingush cavalry regiments were created

      In fact, the Chechen division rebelled and fled in different directions (mainly to the mountains to the abreks). From the remnants gathered a cavalry regiment of 1100 people. It is not thick for the people of 600 thousand.
  10. VS
    +10
    14 January 2019 11: 17
    Quote: Olgovich
    there would be a trial and punishment of SPECIFIC criminals, and today there would be no grievances or problems of the resettled peoples.

    in the context of the ongoing war and the activity of the special services of the enemy seeking to start a war in the Caucasus -
    in the rear of the Red Army - in this region - these things were IMPOSSIBLE to do by definition ...
    1. Alf
      +5
      14 January 2019 19: 55
      Quote: V.S.
      Quote: Olgovich
      there would be a trial and punishment of SPECIFIC criminals, and today there would be no grievances or problems of the resettled peoples.

      in the context of the ongoing war and the activity of the special services of the enemy seeking to start a war in the Caucasus -
      in the rear of the Red Army - in this region - these things were IMPOSSIBLE to do by definition ...

      Overseas Democrats generally did not stand on ceremony with the Japanese — after Pearl Harbor, all Japanese, Chinese, Malays, and other narrow-pupils were assigned to concentration camps in bulk, and until now they didn’t apologize.
    2. -3
      15 January 2019 09: 22
      Quote: V.S.
      in the context of the ongoing war and the activity of the special services of the enemy seeking to start a war in the Caucasus -
      in the rear of the Red Army - in this region - these things were IMPOSSIBLE to do by definition ..

      This was done in conditions of war and the activity of special services. IMMEDIATELY IMMEDIATELY after the liberation of the occupied territories EVERYWHERE in the USSR from 1942 to the present day: identified, tried, hanged. And successfully done.

      Chechnya was practically not even occupied.
      Do not write nonsense.
  11. VS
    -9
    14 January 2019 11: 18
    Quote: Olgovich
    just a hundred years ago, in Chechnya was powerful Russian Chechnya destroyed to please the Red Highlanders?

    stupid things .. my ancestors lived there for centuries and no one particularly squeezed Russian from Chechnya - from Moscow)))
    1. -1
      15 January 2019 09: 23
      Quote: V.S.
      stupid things .. my ancestors lived there for centuries and no one particularly squeezed Russian from Chechnya

      Yes, you are simply illiterate.
  12. VS
    +4
    14 January 2019 11: 22
    Quote: Aviator_
    There was a provocation by the NKVD when a false fascist reconnaissance group was abandoned to them (Germans), which the local population preferred not to report to the authorities. That's all set off

    well enough already))) Nonsense to carry it by nature or acquired? The Germans sent HERE groups of agents and thus landed in the steppes of Kalmykia, where it is easier to hide in the reed steppe. and not immediately in the Caucasus ..
  13. VS
    -18
    14 January 2019 11: 22
    Quote: Aviator_
    Khrushch rehabilitated all of our accomplices.

    were not nokhchi as people accomplices to anyone))
  14. +18
    14 January 2019 12: 08
    Due to an acute shortage of documents, historians from different republics are still arguing over which deportation is depicted in a particular photo.

    In the photo, food supply, "virgin lands" in Kazakhstan. This photo has been discussed recently on Twitter and the like.
    1. +22
      14 January 2019 12: 34
      Found something.
      1. +1
        15 January 2019 21: 10
        Thanks for the tip. There are simply hundreds of links on this photo, they just failed to find the right one, like many things on the net, we will try to fix the puncture promptly.
        1. 0
          16 January 2019 13: 54
          You have the correct caption for the photo.
          Due to the acute shortage of documents, historians from different republics are still argue...
  15. +7
    14 January 2019 18: 25
    I, somehow, talked with one person, whose family (he was then still a child) was sent to some kind of work in the Chechen Republic of the ASSR in the fifties. They were given housing in an abandoned house of Chechens deported to Kazakhstan. And so, when they (the Chechens) began to return to their homeland, they discovered that someone was already living in their homes. And there were notes (with a wrapped stone, of course) flying through the windows, threatening newcomers. "Leave where you came from, we will cut." Somehow, I didn’t come up with it myself.
  16. +7
    14 January 2019 18: 55
    there were always Russophobic, pro-Turkish sentiments long before the Bolsheviks, so no need to invent
  17. The comment was deleted.
    1. VS
      +4
      15 January 2019 07: 59
      deportation is not a punishment. This is an evacuation ... People were saved by this relocation. Otherwise - they would have to drive the army and stupidly bombed everything to hell - together with the population supporting the militants that the Germans fought for the money ..
      SO WAS TO DO WHAT?
      1. -1
        15 January 2019 12: 51
        Crimeans also have the right to evacuate?
  18. The comment was deleted.
  19. +9
    15 January 2019 23: 41
    Tell about "poor, offended by all Chechens" to those people who broke off two recent wars at the turn of the century !!! They also talk about humanity. Who is more among this nation? Honest people or thieves and murderers! And what should have been done in 1944 and in 2000 .......
  20. +8
    16 January 2019 00: 36
    the return of these peoples ... was not accompanied by compensation for colossal deportation damage

    And when will they compensate for the "damage" for tens of thousands of Russian people killed, brutally tortured and robbed? For bullying Russian women and children?
    They remember their "suffering" ... and who will remind them of the suffering they brought to the Russian people?
  21. +2
    17 January 2019 12: 29
    During the eviction, transportation of deported - 177 echelons of freight cars - and in the first years after it (1944-1946 years) about 100 thousands of Chechens and almost 23 thousands of Ingush were killed - every fourth of both peoples.

    1. 0
      18 March 2019 18: 38
      That's it. Lies about 100 thousand Chechens and 25 thousand Ingush "who died" on the road have already been hammered into the heads of little Ingush and Chechens.
  22. +3
    17 January 2019 21: 50
    Persons who fought in the Red Army, as well as their relatives, were not deported !!! The deportees were paid compensation for cattle, landings and buildings. At the place of settlement, they were supplied with building materials, cattle and seed! The same Uzbeks raged against the Chechens living in adobe shacks when the Chechens built capital houses.
    1. +1
      23 January 2019 15: 46
      Comrade Stalin did not complete it, as in the western outskirts. The greatness of this person is not doubtful, but to this day it is necessary to disentangle a lot. The question, in the current realities, is not solvable. The Kremlin will continue to pay "for loyalty", or rather the Russian People.
  23. 0
    24 January 2019 09: 36
    Another stuffing! Bored of life?
  24. -1
    26 February 2019 00: 14
    it is not good to justify violence and lawlessness towards anyone. Do not be afraid that one day you will be rewarded and you will watch, God forbid, this is how you and your loved ones slurp the same thing that the deportees survived. they hardly sinned before God and people more than you
    1. The comment was deleted.
  25. 0
    26 February 2019 12: 27
    It’s absurd to look at the eviction of the Caucasian peoples from the position of today, then there was another time, and other people, and the war was still going on, and how it will end, and when, no one knew. but there were events, not long ago, 1942-1943 when representatives of the mountain peoples collaborated, and even fought in the ranks of the Wehrmacht and SD. and in 1944, they not only hid in the mountains, but carried out sabotage, and other actions in a strategically important area. and the groans about ,, poor mountain women and children ”are nothing more than another Russophobic myth. mountain children were in the same position as millions of their peers in the liberated territory of the USSR. and who was worse, in terms of food, still need to look.
  26. -1
    18 March 2019 18: 35
    He can be called one of the main fighters for the rights of repressed peoples. /// Simply put, a Chechen Nazi.
  27. 0
    6 September 2019 12: 21
    the eviction of peoples was the crime of the century. This is not done in the civilized world. People do not want to live as part of Russia, but for God's sake, why torment them, let them live in their own ways. Chechens need to decide whether to live as part of Russia or separately and double standards lead to such consequences. I am sure that the bulk of the population wants to live with Russia, but there is a layer of the population who wants to live freely, that is, they are not law-abiding and these people do not allow Chechens to live normally.