Shuttle Fighter

64
Shuttle Fighter
Farther in depth stories the days of the Red Empire - the Soviet Union are passing away. But many more of his secrets are hidden from our view. Recently information about the Soviet fighter "Shuttle" called "Spiral" was declassified, the name is the aerospace system - which was a reusable space fighter-bomber, which was developed by Soviet scientists in the sixties of the last century. The Soviet project "Spiral" was our response to the attempt by the Americans to create the X-20 space reconnaissance bomber Dyna Soar.

The system "Spiral" included the aircraft, taking the ship into orbit, accelerating stage and directly single-space module. This system was created for combat use in space, as well as for the inspection of any space objects in order to establish their purpose or liquidation. This information was announced on TV on Russia channel 17 on April 2010.

The improved form of "Spiral" is a multipurpose space interceptor MAX. Although MAKS could be used for military purposes, it was developed mainly for economic purposes - for placing people and cargo into orbit, for use in conjunction with the orbital space station. The developer was NPO "Lightning".
In 1969, the Experimental Piloted Orbital Plane (EPOS) was tested - the atmospheric analogue of the Spiral. We were already ready for space supremacy at that time. But where are all these ships? Where did they go? In the race for America, the original projects were not needed.

Everyone knows the American fantasy movie "Star Wars". But we were the first to propose and implement the idea of ​​Star Wars. We were already ready for a battle in space at that time. If the American Shuttle is limited in its maneuverability in space and is not able to fly in the atmosphere, then the Soviet orbital complexes were developed and tested as full-featured systems.

In 1961, Yury Alekseevich Gagarin made the first space flight in the history of mankind around the Earth. And already in 1965, in the USSR, Gleb Evgenievich Lozino-Lozinsky designed the Spiral, a space-controlled fighter-interceptor, which was called the hunter for Shuttles. It was a warship for war in the atmosphere and space, having a cruising speed of 6000 km / h. He had an unusual shape and, of course, it would be wrong to call him an airplane. Possessing a wide, semi-circular fuselage, he looked more like a slightly flattened shark. His belonging to the class of aircraft gave out only the small sloping back wings, which gave him the outlines of a swift bird. The first "Spiral" did not have marching engines, so it descended to the airfield, planning in the air. "Spiral" could be used both in automatic mode and with manual control.

In the "Spiral" was provided a system for rescuing a pilot from any height in the form of an emergency capsule and a conventional ejection system. At the same time, a secret team was organized to train pilots to operate ships of this type. It included the well-known Dzhanibekov, and German Titov was appointed commander of the combat astronauts. The first model of the "Spiral" - its subsonic counterpart, the EPOS, was launched on December 6 1969 on the height of 40 km. The first strategic hypersonic Rocket carrier aircraft was developed, designed to launch it into orbit. And here the Soviet engineers went unconventional: in a military confrontation, it would be enough to destroy the stationary Space Launch Complex and bring the combat vehicles into space from nowhere. And you can launch them with the help of an airplane from almost any specially equipped heavy airfield, it is mobile. The plane lifted the ship into the stratosphere and it started with the engines turned on right from its back. Therefore, the aircraft was designed for a very large carrying capacity in order to withstand the recoil at the start of the Spiral or EPOS.

The first launch of the EPOS was made in 1976 year, the test was successful. According to experts, the EPOS had unique aerodynamic characteristics. Igor Volk, Valery Menitsky and Alexander Fedotov tried it on. In addition to the EPOS, even small-size automatic models of an orbital ship under the general name “Bor” - Unmanned Orbital Rocketplan were tested.
The Spiral was ready for serial production, but the Minister of Defense Grechko sent the project to the basket with a stroke of a pen, saying:
- There is nothing to do fiction!
The intervention of DF has also contributed to the freezing of the project. Ustinov, who was at that time the secretary of the Central Committee of the CPSU. Due to false political ambitions at the insistence of D.F. Ustinov and the Minister of General Engineering S.A. Afanasyev started the race with the Americans and their project Space Shuttle, while sacrificing Spiral, a system that, according to competent domestic and foreign experts, is much more progressive.

- If you add that the USSR was perhaps the only country where space problems were separated from aviation and the aviation industry, and even in the absence of a powerful coordinating organization, such as the American NASA, it is surprising not the gradual elimination of the Spiral work, but how much has been done. - Writes by Lebedev Vitaly Vladislavovich, member of the St. Petersburg Section of the History of Aviation and Cosmonautics at the IIET them. S.I. Vavilova RAS.

Lozino-Lodz was invited to do a new project - "Buran", which he successfully did. But Buran, compared to Spiral and MAKS, turned out to be a much more expensive project. The same EPOS flew four times, testing the insulation for the Buran. The first full launch of Buran in 1982 was successful, then it landed near Australia. But Gleb Evgenievich did not cease to be engaged in his brainchild, in parallel with the project “Buran” he perfected and tested “Spiral”. Its new modification was developed: “MAKS” - Multipurpose Aerospace System. MAKS was intended for orbital patrols in space over the territory of our country. She could, for example, move closer to US satellites, examining them for the degree of danger to the country, she was also equipped weapons for the destruction of both satellites and the "Shuttle". The MAX consisted of a space double module, but already with main engines, which made it maneuverable in the atmosphere and a discharged fuel tank. In addition to the two pilots, MAX is capable of delivering seven tons of cargo into orbit, or in its place, passengers.
This “design” was to be emitted into the atmosphere by a special aircraft. By that time there was already a similar project - the heavy transport aircraft “Mriya”. When calculating the cost of putting one ton of cargo into orbit for different spacecraft, including American Shuttles, MAKS turned out to be the cheapest carrier. In addition, it could be sold abroad, as there is infrastructure for civil aviation in any camp.

When 15 November 1988, the Buran made its full-fledged first and last flight in automatic mode, the Americans were very surprised. They asked Lozino-Lodzinsky:
- How so? After all, you do not have software!
It turns out that everything is there. Only it is not clear why we still use American Windows. Who knows what kind of "cockroaches" lurk in it, and if we do not lose the entire Internet, happen that serious ...

"Buran" was ready for production. Moreover, our designers did not create a copy of the Shuttle, but a more efficient ship in all respects. Even his only flight proved it. He was ready to perform applied tasks in space and to ensure the regular delivery of people and goods into orbit.
But ... here Mikhail Gorbachev signs a disarmament agreement with Reagan in Reykjavik, and the project was crushed. He was not needed! Long live world peace! Hooray! A "Buran" - in his basket!

- With an external similarity with the Shuttle, the Buran is a fundamentally more advanced spacecraft; and the main result of the long-term efforts was the triumphal twin-turn unmanned flight of the Buran with the automatic landing of 15 on November 1988 of the year. The flight duration of 206 minutes began. At 9 hour 11 minutes, at the height of 50 km, Buran contacted the tracking stations in the landing complex area, and at 9 hour 24 minutes 42 seconds, just a second ahead of time, Buran, overcoming side wind gusts at 263 km / h speed, gracefully touched the strip and after 42 seconds, ran 1620 m, stopped at its center with a deviation from the centerline of only 3 m! - Vyacheslav Kazmin writes in his article.

It was the high point of the Chief Designer of Buran, Doctor of Technical Sciences Gleb Evgenyevich Lozino-Lozinsky.
28 November 2001, Gleb Evgenievich Lozino-Lozinsky dies, without waiting for the production of his Spirals, Max and Buran. But in the spring of this year, the Americans, declaring that the Shuttle project was rolling out, are launching a completely new spacecraft into space ... which, outwardly, is like two peas in a pod like Spiral. They developed it themselves or bought a finished project, because in the era of market relations everything is sold and bought? Who knows. Moreover, we have just signed with the hypocritically smiling US President another treaty on yet another disarmament. However, why does America really need outdated weapons, if it now has its own - American MAXS? A rhetorical question ... Only now they will “sniff” and control our military satellites, not we them ...

Currently, something has moved forward in this direction: Roskosmos announced a competition to create a reusable manned spacecraft of a new generation. It is created for the transport-technical maintenance of manned orbital stations and other objects of the near-earth orbital group.
The Clipper project is already in the process of development. It is designed not only for going into orbit, but also for the flight to the moon. Clipper is a six-seater reusable spacecraft, launched with the help of an Energia carrier rocket.

PS This information does not pretend to be complete on this topic. It is obtained from open sources. Official documents are still classified.
64 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +43
    10 June 2012 07: 20
    A design school begins with a school desk.
    Another proof of the effectiveness of the Soviet education system
    1. +17
      10 June 2012 07: 30
      Eh, since then so much is lost. request
    2. +18
      10 June 2012 07: 31
      Quote: Dmitriy69
      A design school begins with a school desk.

      Greetings, Dima and fully support these words! At the same time, I hope that the education system will slowly change for the better.
      I read the article with a feeling of longing for ruined opportunities and achievements ... Not a bottom or a tire for our remodelers - Gorbach and EBNu!
      The last paragraph inspired some optimism and hope ------------ bully Currently, something has moved forward in this direction: Roskosmos announced a competition to create a reusable manned spacecraft of a new generation. It is created for the transport-technical maintenance of manned orbital stations and other objects of the near-earth orbital group.
      The Clipper project is already under development. It is designed not only to enter orbit, but also to fly to the moon. The Clipper is a six-seater reusable spacecraft that starts with the launch of the Energia launch vehicle. --------- bully The article, in my opinion, deserves only a plus. A plus! good
      1. +11
        10 June 2012 07: 59
        Quote: esaul
        At the same time, I hope that the education system will slowly change for the better.

        Good afternoon, Valery. I do not see any particular progress in this regard so far, for all my optimism. And "quiet" is no longer possible, and so how much time (people) has been lost
      2. 755962
        +9
        10 June 2012 08: 24
        Quote: esaul
        The article, in my opinion, deserves only a plus.

        And it further fuels interest in domestic space exploration. The Americans are already flying. When are we?
        http://science.compulenta.ru/639646/
        1. Neighbor
          +5
          10 June 2012 11: 38
          Quote: 755962
          And it further fuels interest in domestic space exploration. The Americans are already flying. When are we?

          Surely there are projects under the heading of Owls. Secretly. If the Spiral of the 70s - that's just declassified - and then not completely. What can we say about modern projects.
          Interesting - because with the advent of the S-500 - the Shuttle Fighter will not be needed. So that. They will stray from the Earth - like ordinary planes.
          Quote: Roscosmos announced a competition to create a reusable manned spacecraft of a new generation. Yes
          It is created for transport and technical maintenance of orbital manned stations and other objects of the near-Earth orbital group.
          The Clipper project is already under development drinks . It is designed not only to enter orbit, but also to fly to the moon. The Clipper is a six-seater reusable spacecraft that starts with the launch of the Energia launch vehicle.
          Here is the answer to your question. wink
          1. +2
            10 June 2012 12: 23
            Quote: Neighbor
            with the advent of C-500 - the Shuttle Fighter will not be needed.

            How not needed? This is practically the 6 generation of aircraft
            1. Neighbor
              +1
              10 June 2012 17: 55
              Quote: RedDragoN
              This is almost the 6th generation of aircraft

              By the 6th generation - Aircraft - PAK-DA is more likely! Which - God willing - will enter the arsenal of the Russian army in the near future!
              And it will be - BEST - by plane in the world !!! Yes - for the spectrum of its application, its TX - will be colossal !!!
              Quote: Neighbor
              The Clipper project is already under development. It is designed not only to enter orbit, but also to fly to the moon.

              Quote: RedDragoN
              How not needed?

              Yes, I need, I need. Do not worry! It is written - In development !!! wink
          2. +5
            10 June 2012 23: 45
            Quote: Neighbor
            Interesting - because with the advent of C-500 - the Shuttle Fighter will not be needed.

            Neighbor, Khrushchev at one time also thought so ...., such promising developments were ditched that to this day we scratch turnips .... if it were not a "bald maize" Russia was already flying on the eighth generation of aircraft.
          3. +6
            11 June 2012 00: 16
            Quote: Neighbor
            Surely there are projects under the heading of Owls. Secretly. If the Spiral of the 70s - that's just declassified - and then not completely. What to say about modern projects


            Shuttle weapons existed and were put into practice.
            When the Americans created the Shuttle space shuttle, at one time these ships flew over the territory of our country. The notes of protest had no effect. Then it was decided to make a light, "preventive" shot at the shuttle from the installation "Granite". The impact power was small - so that there would be no casualties. But the Shuttle crew lost consciousness for half an hour, almost all of the ship's equipment was out of order, and I had to land using manual control. The Americans quickly understood everything: no more shuttle flew over the territory of the USSR

            Read all My webpage.
            1. Neighbor
              -1
              11 June 2012 09: 42
              Quote: Ascetic
              Read My Webpage Entirely

              Thanks - read it. Very interesting! good
              As I would like - to Amer All-all their evil returned am , not just frost -40!
              I remembered by the way: even under Stalin there was a plan for turning 2 rivers in the direction of Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan. If we had turned these rivers - Asia - we would have become a paradise. Gardens, fruits, vegetables. The climate would be Super.
              However, our scientists first calculated, then the Amer scientists, that this would lead to the fact that gender is Ameri.ko..si ... and - in 2 years, it will turn into Siberia !!! With frosts under -50. This was explained by the fact that the influx of warm water into the ocean will decrease by only a fraction of a%. What will affect the overall temperature, the course of the Gulf Stream.
              The project was hushed up - but not out of pity for Amer - but because of an ultimatum - either you don’t touch the river - or Yavoyna. These are the pies. Nature - a VERY sensitive thing - turns out to be. Some 2 rivers - affect the climate of the entire planet !!!
      3. serg211212
        +2
        10 June 2012 10: 06
        the deception is not moving anywhere or even a millimeter has moved
      4. Cadet787
        0
        10 June 2012 23: 19
        I greet you Valera. I would like to believe that the education system will improve, but so far the facts speak otherwise.
      5. Nbus
        +1
        11 June 2012 00: 35
        Half a year ago I read about the "clipper" and that Roskosmos refused to use it and further finance the project. They tried to sell to Europe, or rather to get financing - Europe refused the same for obvious reasons.
    3. rofolak
      0
      10 June 2012 19: 10
      Yes! This is what the last 20 years have been killing.
  2. Igorboss16
    +6
    10 June 2012 07: 39
    so many necessary developments have been ruined that it’s just not at ease, but now they want to revive everything again, so they would now keep the amers at a distance with their x 37 and now it turns out that we have nothing to oppose
  3. TekhnarMAF
    +9
    10 June 2012 08: 12
    Yes, there was a serious backlog to break out in space technologies ahead of the rest of the planet, the amers never dreamed of it! Amers need to erect a monument to these uyo ... kam, and we all start to revive, it's a shame, so many years have been lost and the "old people" are leaving!
    1. +1
      11 June 2012 06: 04
      TekhnarMAF,
      Well, Gorbach has long received his award for his betrayal, the Nobel Peace Prize is called.
  4. Crumbumbes
    +5
    10 June 2012 08: 27
    It's a pity of course, when projects close ...
    Yes, the last lines inspire hope.
    well, in terms of 1-2 local systems .. the drawings still remained after all, the more these systems, as the author writes, have already been tested at the time, they only require modernization ... and quietly, anyway, most likely in this direction who something works ...
  5. patriot2
    +7
    10 June 2012 08: 55
    This is a good article, especially when it is said correctly about "Spiral" and "MAKS" - the projects were tested and ready for implementation, but "thanks" to our politicians - they were ruined, this is something our leaders can do.
    We will wait for news about new projects and remember that waiting and catching up - it does not happen worse!
  6. Owl
    +8
    10 June 2012 09: 30
    Unfortunately, thanks to "market relations", "privatization" and thanks to the "new thinking" of the demolitionist of the USSR, from the developments of the design bureau of the Soviet Union ready for implementation, Russia received almost nothing, and what it received could not be realized. Currently, the squandering and laundering of money allocated for the implementation of a project is flourishing, so nothing goes further than models at exhibitions, satellites are not displayed, rockets do not fly. VVP should, if it wants to correct this disgrace, approach the issue from the position of Yu. Andropov and I.V. Dzhugashvilli (Stalin). For thieves and traitors, only FEAR is understandable. If all this is not necessary for VVP, since it does not bring profit to his big pocket and to the pockets of his daughters and friends, then nothing will change, for another 10 years the model of the Clipper will be taken out to exhibitions and money will be laundered for the construction of the Vostochny cosmodrome and no cosmetic actions (Rogozin's appointment) will lead to restoring order.
    1. +12
      10 June 2012 15: 42
      Quote: Eagle Owl
      satellites are not being displayed, missiles are not flying.


      For the period 1991-2011. spacecraft launches:
      The Russian Federation with the number of starts in 513, failures of 25 or 4,87%
      In the USA, with the number of starts at 450, failures 28 or 6,22%
      The EU with the number of starts in 149, failures of 5 or 3,36%
      In China, with the number of starts at 123, failures 8 or 6,5%
      In Ukraine, with the number of starts in 104, failures 11 or 10,6%
      : http://gloriaputina.livejournal.com/135299.html
      So, the whole space industry was destroyed to hell - it’s true that for some reason the only ones in the world have manned ships, the most launches, the second place in the world in reliability is ahead of the United States. And still in the world there are only two global satellite positioning systems: besides the USA and Russia, nobody just has them. Look at GLONASS and GPS data My webpage
      Over the past five years, Russia annually increases the number of space launches. Moreover, Russia is the only country to consistently increase the number of launches.
      As for accidents, during this period there were 8 of them (the States - 5). However, the percentage of accidents, relative to the number of launches we have 6,5, the US 5,8. And this with all the "brain drain" from here to there.
      But we all perfectly understand that the topic of foreign accidents is a taboo, and the falling Phobos in our media will be eternal and daily.
      1. +4
        10 June 2012 17: 43
        Only more often do we launch foreign satellites into space, and not ours.
        1. FTALL
          0
          10 June 2012 22: 47
          sesame, Their own mostly satellites chip in the lifespan of Russian devices laughing
          1. +7
            10 June 2012 23: 12
            Quote: FTALL
            chip in the service life of Russian devices

            Here, here’s the trick just in this, but exactly the opposite-In Obninsk, together with the Lavochkin Scientific and Production Association, we have developed special, again composite, thermal panels, the so-called passive thermal control system, inside of which a coolant circulates through thin aluminum tubes. Scientific equipment is already attached to them. The reliability of spacecraft assembled using the new technology has increased many times over. The warranty period for satellites in orbit has increased from 3-5 to 12-15 years.

            According to Anatoly Khmelnitsky, Deputy Director General for Scientific and Production Activities, about 170 panels are produced annually, which makes it possible to complete 20 satellites. The European Astrium corporation, which produces similar products, completes only 5-7 satellites per year. At the same time, they employ almost 200 people in assembly, while we employ 25, and the area of ​​the French assembly shop is more than ten times larger than the Russian one.

            In Obninsk, it takes less than three months to produce a satellite panel from receiving the terms of reference, developing a project, and to assembling the final product, in the West it takes almost a year.

            A very important technological detail. Special panels (embedded elements) are glued to the panels in the amount of up to 1500 pieces, 120 microns thick and the gap between them is 100 microns. In the USA and Western Europe, the operation is performed by expensive and difficult to maintain robots. In Russia, this is done manually. And productivity and gluing accuracy are several times higher than that of a robot. When Western experts compared what was being done and how it was done in Russia, they experienced a state close to shock. It can't be! But it is.
        2. CC-18a
          +5
          10 June 2012 22: 53
          Not true.
          Dear before blurt out heresy and nonsense would ask a question.
          And so the fact that you categorically declare that you know nothing and moreover you yourself understand that you know nothing, it doesn’t make you look extremely and looks generally silly and shameful.

          The truth is that we do not launch as many foreign satellites as you write and as you would like. The basis of all these are our companions.
          In addition, if we examine the situation thoroughly for each launch and satellite affiliation, it turns out that the share of foreign satellites in the number of launches of Russian missiles is steadily falling. The peak of launches of foreign satellites was in the 90s, by the end of the 90s more precisely. In the same 90s, it’s just no secret that our space industry survived only on foreign orders, at the same time now we can do without foreign orders, thank Putin for that wink Let it bother you, but it's true.
      2. 0
        10 June 2012 19: 51
        Ascetic,
        if possible, still small Israel also launches satellites, however many failures are not in the know: http: //www.jewniverse.ru/biher/AShulman/25.htm
        1. +4
          10 June 2012 23: 58
          Quote: igor67
          if possible, still small Israel also launches satellites, however many failures are not in the know


          On December 11, 2011, the Israeli Amos-5 satellite (telecommunications) was launched from the Baikonur cosmodrome "Proton-M" launch vehicle. Last year, it seems, that's all.
          My webpage
          2010-22 June Ofek-9 (intelligence)
          My webpage
          In 2009 and 2008, too, one at a time
          My webpage
          ... http://www.cosmoworld.ru/spaceencyclopedia/hotnews/itogi_2009a.doc
          To summarize, we can say that today the main problem of the Israeli space program is the deep contradiction between the high potential and the limited resources of Israel. But, given the effectiveness of the results obtained with such scanty funding, one can imagine what the Israelis would have achieved if their space budget were at least three times higher than the current one. And there are people in the country who understand this. Retired Major General Professor Yitzhak bin Israel, Chairman of the Israel Space Agency, is the main “fighter” for increasing the space budget. Ben Israel believes that by raising space costs to $ 130 million a year, the country will be able to receive $ 2 billion in annual revenue. But alas, Israel has enough problems on Earth, and its politicians are not yet up to space. Whether the situation will change - time will tell.

          From an article in the magazine "Vokrug Sveta" May 2008. For three years the situation has not changed much, so the article is informative.
          My webpage
          Israeli intelligence agencies purchase GRU satellites in the mid-90s
          My webpage
          Israel is rightfully considered one of the leading space powers in the world. Since the launch of the first Ofek-1 satellite in September 1988, Israeli specialists have created dozens of the latest models of space technology and launched spacecraft for various purposes.
          In rocket science, Israel is one of the world leaders - it produces almost the entire range of missile weapons - from tactical missiles of land, sea and air-based to giant ballistic missiles such as Jericho, capable of carrying warheads up to seven and a half thousand kilometers ... That these missiles were to become launch vehicles of future Israeli spacecraft.
          The real breakthrough was the creation in Israel of a three-stage Shavit rocket. Israel uses this rocket as a means of launching its space satellites into near-Earth orbit, however, according to foreign experts, its characteristics are fully consistent with the requirements for intercontinental ballistic missiles.

          Alexander Shulman is certainly a patriot of his country, but without denying the successes of little Israel, you must agree that you still need to be more modest, it’s one thing to produce satellites for the United States under a contract for 1,6 billion dollars, it’s another thing to regularly build up your space constellation even though would Nigeria (3 KA for 2011) or Argentina (3) with Ukraine (2)
          1. +1
            11 June 2012 00: 10
            Ascetic,
            To be honest, I just found out about the Israeli program by chance, two years ago I was traveling with tourists from Russia and a guide, traveling between Ashdod and Ashkelon, said pay attention to the Israeli spaceport.
            1. +3
              11 June 2012 00: 35
              Quote: igor67
              igor67


              Igor for completeness, the composition of the satellite constellation of Israel (data for 2008, add even the above and get a full alignment)
              My webpage
              IDF Satellite Intelligence Unit for General Development
              My webpage

              The truth about the resolution of the optics is somewhat exaggerated. It is authentically known that the first satellite with a high up to 30cm resolution. optics was launched by Russia on May 18 this year.
              1. 0
                11 June 2012 00: 44
                Ascetic,
                Yes, there were launches together with the Americans from the offshore platform, now it seems to be abandoned
                1. +3
                  11 June 2012 01: 15
                  Quote: igor67
                  Yes, there were launches together with the Americans from the offshore platform, now it seems to be abandoned


                  There is only one marine spaceport in the world.Sea Launch Created as a sea-based spaceport by the United States with the participation of Norway, Russia and Ukraine. It is operated by Boeing (USA) with the participation of Kvaerner (Norway), RSC Energia (Russia), GKB Yuzhnoye and PO Yuzhmash (Ukraine). The Odyssey, a self-propelled launching platform (SPP) with a single launcher, is based in the home port of Long Beach (Florida, USA) and is heading to its starting point with a longitude of 154 ° C. D., located at the equator in the Pacific Ocean in the area of. Christmas (as part of the state of Kiribati). The launch complex also includes a command ship. The LV is assembled in a horizontal position at a technical position in the port of registry, then in a fully assembled position it is transferred to the SPP, where it is stored in the hangar in a horizontal position until launch. Before starting, leaves the hangar on the transport and installation unit, is translated into a vertical position and starts. A deserted start, fully automated, the type of preparation for launch is mobile. From the complex, medium-class 3eHHT-3SLB LV launches are launched from commercial spacecraft into equatorial orbits. Perhaps Israeli satellites launched it, but I'm not sure about that.
                  There is another international spaceport. Cosmodrome Biak - Russian-Indonesian - the spaceport is designed to base a missile system "Air start." It is an airfield with the necessary infrastructure, on which up to three An-124 carriers can be based. It is planned to carry out commercial launches of satellites using the Polet light air launch vehicle (up to 2-4 launches per year), including into sun-synchronous and geostationary orbits. The first launches were planned in 2011, but I don’t know how things are going there, in the course of the project the project is bent, although a similar amerovsky "Pegasus" has been operating for a long time
      3. CC-18a
        +6
        10 June 2012 22: 48
        In fairness, I note that the annual number of launches in the 90s was significant, from 25 to 37 launches per year. This happened with a constant drop in the number of launches, from year to year to 2004, in my opinion, the lowest rates in the history of the Russian Federation were.
        Then again, with the advent of Putin, the number of launches increased.
        If someone doesn’t understand, I’ll explain that a large number of launches in the early 90s was due not to Yeltsin’s nyashka but to the backlog of the USSR which made satellites and ordered in the 80s and that the workers continued to make satellites and rockets without receiving a salary (1987-1996).
        True assessments of a person and his activity are measured not by single indicators, but by dynamics. Under Yeltsin, the dynamics were negative and disastrous. Under Putin, the dynamics are positive.

        By the way, the recent hype with the fall and unsuccessful launches surprised me greatly.
        If you look at the fact, it turns out that the% of unsuccessful launches in 2010-2011 was lower than in the USA, for example, and lower than in Russia in previous years, especially in the 90s. However, in the 90s and early 2000s few people blundered about this, and here out of the blue in ordinary practice raised a cry and noise xs how much! It’s clear that in 2008-2012, our media space was occupied by unscrupulous and anti-patriotic and, moreover, corrupt journalists and editors who make noise on any occasion based on orders from overseas, there is no other explanation, either stupidity or direct betrayal and venality.
        1. +2
          11 June 2012 11: 25
          CC-18a,
          Well, the profession obliges! No wonder it is compared with prostitution!
  7. Nursultan
    +4
    10 June 2012 09: 50
    Yes, there were good projects. Could already dominate not only in the air but also in space. Well, all power politicians are only ruining everything ...
  8. +5
    10 June 2012 09: 56
    Thank you for the article! I learned a lot of new things. After reading, I felt a sense of pride for Soviet science and for the people who embodied the geial design developments in "iron"! But there is also a sense of bitterness - some mediocre people were in the political leadership of the country! Of course, it's much easier to judge from today's "bump", but all the same - if you are in a high position, then you should not have the right to make a mistake! These mistakes are too expensive for the country and the people!
    1. Alexey Prikazchikov
      +4
      10 June 2012 11: 53
      And I have a feeling of pain for them all, after all, all these developments are ape at Amer.
  9. pribolt
    +3
    10 June 2012 10: 46
    As always, our two main pests, Gorbachev and EBN
  10. FiremanRS
    +3
    10 June 2012 11: 10
    Trouble, just trouble .... how many such breakthrough projects have been ruined? Amer can’t create themselves, just buy brains .... And how many such projects are still dust in the archives? and how many more traitors will they sell them over the hill in pursuit of a long bucks? A complete decline in morals and conscience - from a simple citizen to high politicians .... Money is everything, although not so long ago this was not ..... Pichal ... ((
  11. +13
    10 June 2012 11: 47
    I express hope that sooner or later I will return to this topic. But only at a new scientific and technical level ... I would like to believe! ..
    Well, at least roughly as shown on this art ...
    1. +5
      10 June 2012 21: 32
      Quote: Chicot 1
      I would like to believe! .. Well, at least approximately as shown on this art ...

      Vasily, welcome! Believe correctly wink ! I quote:Recently, the press reported that the Central Aerohydrodynamic Institute (TsAGI) carried out studies of the aerospace complex, designed for intercontinental flights at a speed close to the first space - about 20 thousand km / h. According to the TsAGI press service, the system consists of a subsonic carrier aircraft and an aerospace aircraft (VKS) with a liquid rocket engine. At a range of 16 — 17 thousand km, the flight time of an aerospace aircraft takes place in three stages — active orbiting, space flight at near-orbit speed, and planning in the atmosphere. Moreover, this flight will not take more than 50 minutes.

      As a carrier aircraft can be used IL-76MF and IL-96-400T. It is a transport aircraft that must raise the main accelerated module to a great height. After that, the aerospace plane will independently go into orbit, pick up speed up to 20 thousand kilometers per hour, and then plan in the atmosphere for the desired target.

      Previously, TsAGI conducted a systematic analysis of various options for a reusable space rocket system (MRS 1). MRKS-1 is a partially reusable vertical launch vehicle based on the winged reusable first stage, made according to the airplane scheme and returned to the launch area for horizontal landing on the 1 class airfield, and on the basis of disposable second stages and upper stages. The first stage winged reusable unit is equipped with reusable marching liquid rocket engines.

      Foreign analysts highly appreciate the capabilities of the Russian military-industrial complex in this regard: there are no technical reasons that would not allow Russia to create an unmanned orbital aircraft after America.

      “The main Russian technologies necessary for this are already half a century old,” said American space expert Jim Oberg. “The Russians have been experimenting with cruise spacecraft since the 1960's and even put the prototype into orbit, but today they are weakened by reforms. Therefore, everything depends on the political will of the country's leadership and the armed forces. ” And this problem is perhaps more complicated than the technical one, but let's hope that it is surmountable.

      So even American analysts admit that Russia will possess such weapons, and in the very near future drinks
      1. +4
        10 June 2012 22: 03
        Good day, Victor! smile drinks
        The very idea of ​​a horizontal air launch for orbital reusable vehicles is far from new. At one time it was offered by Lozino-Lozovsky. However, later it was decided (mostly political) to copy (take as a basis) the American Space Shuttle system ...
        And the information you provided is very, very interesting. I would like this project not to be "stabbed" for one reason or another (including for the same political reasons!) Like Spiral ...

        And another art from the same series ... smile
        1. +5
          10 June 2012 23: 03
          Quote: Chicot 1
          And another art from the same series

          Handsomely!!! good !! drinks ! The good news is that the idea is not forgotten, and on its basis, work continues to create fellow
          1. +2
            10 June 2012 23: 26
            smile Well, since such a booze has gone ... drinks... then another, and from there ... smile
            1. +3
              10 June 2012 23: 47
              Quote: Chicot 1
              Well, since such a booze has gone

              Ah .... drink it like that, sleep like that with the queen !!! good drinks drinks drinks
              1. +2
                11 June 2012 00: 50
                drinks drinks drinks Teza - "Each has a queen for the night!" - has been relevant at all times! .. wink bully

                However (for the sake of objectivity) our main rival should not be ignored either. And I must admit, the more successful rival is the Space Shuttle ships ...
                "Colombia". 12.04.1981/XNUMX/XNUMX ... The first flight ...
    2. FTALL
      +4
      10 June 2012 22: 50
      It will be like this on June 13 or 16, so wait a couple of days for you)))) the orbital launcher starts from the side of the Boeing and will put the space radio into orbit drinks telescope

      1. +4
        10 June 2012 23: 19
        Only here in this photo the plane is not Boeing at all, but MDD. More precisely DC-10 ... wink Careful kag-be necessary, dear FTALL... smile
        1. FTALL
          +2
          10 June 2012 23: 50
          Yes, not Boeing was wrong but not DC 10 wink this is Lockheed L-1011 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_L-1011_TriStar
          1. +2
            11 June 2012 00: 11
            Yes you are right. smile Not MDD DC-10 ... Yes But in any case, not Boeing ... tongue wink
            By the way (not in the subject, but beautiful!) - art with DC-10 ... smile
            1. FTALL
              0
              11 June 2012 00: 35
              Here is another handsome space man from virgin galaxies) while NASA was engaged in orbital astronautics, very few people were interested in space in the news, the launch of Mars rovers of scientific vehicles of telescopes was sometimes not mentioned at all or was an ordinary event, but it was worth giving this niche to private traders and everything changed instead of "boring" shuttles a bunch of projects and PR
  12. Alexey Prikazchikov
    +5
    10 June 2012 11: 52
    Remember, there was an article about how amers allegedly created their ship straight like a spiral. That's why I laid out this article, God, how sickening even if the war with amers began to sew some sort of a or several, eeeh.
    1. snek
      +2
      10 June 2012 20: 01
      Quote: Alexey Prikazchikov
      God, how sickening even if the war with amers began to sew some sort of a or several, eeeh.

      What is the problem? Go to Afghanistan and mow the vile Yankees left and right! Is quite real. Or doesn’t it go beyond the shock of a virtual fist?
      1. Alexey Prikazchikov
        +5
        10 June 2012 21: 19
        With perfumes on one side, no. Are there any more vacancies?
        1. snek
          +3
          10 June 2012 21: 48
          Iraq. In the future, Syria and Iran. If this region does not suit you, then American bases are located more or less around the world (including in certain CIS countries). Well, do not forget about the United States itself - getting there will be a little more difficult, but if you have such an ardent desire to kill them that you are ready to wish our country war for this, then everything is possible, you just need a little imagination and effort. If it’s really too lazy to go outside the homeland, then there’s an option with the American embassy (old joke - how to get to the American embassy? - It's very simple - aim, and then shoot), or wait until the transshipment point is built in Ulyanovsk. So the possibilities are huge - go ahead!
          1. Alexey Prikazchikov
            +2
            10 June 2012 22: 36
            That's about Ulyanovsk, it’s great if it’s interesting whether they sell the forbidden thread except for cargo through the base, in the end, the Avgans began to trade drugs with them.
            1. Oleg0705
              +1
              10 June 2012 23: 14
              Quote: Alexey Prikazchikov
              Ulyanovsk is great, will it be interesting if they are forbidden to sell a thread other than cargo through the base?


              there can be no base in Russia Nato think for yourself what kind of precedent will be created for the republic of the former USSR excluding the Baltic states
          2. CC-18a
            +3
            10 June 2012 23: 06
            I’m grieving you, we are not fighting against anyone, but for our homeland.
            Homeland will order Go to Syria and kill the Yankees, even if it is secretive and secret, I don’t think that many will refuse ... but until the Homeland says we will not produce unnecessary deaths, we are not as bloodthirsty as the Yankees.
  13. +3
    10 June 2012 13: 47
    And how many more promising developments have the Yeltsin liberalists sold!
  14. Nechai
    +2
    10 June 2012 14: 28
    Quote: pribolt
    As always, our two main pests, Gorbachev and EBN

    If only there were TWO MAIN - the degeneration and expression of the party bureaucracy. Destruction of collectivism. Double morality, or rather the declared morality and the real, the prevailing immorality. The assertion in the minds of Soviet people of the "truth" that nothing depends on them. The inhibition of space programs (and even their military aspect, all the more so) was one of the conditions, fulfilling which, the elite of the Union was promised a place in the World Elite. Naive - the promises of the Zapadlians are good for them only because no one was going to fulfill them seriously.
    In addition, here is a link, in my informative resource - buran.ru -
    http://www.buran.ru/htm/maxmain.htm
    1. Volkhov
      +3
      10 June 2012 17: 40
      The Russian system of power could be revived after the war under Stalin, when the front-line soldiers advanced to leadership, but after the loss of a leader, most careers were stopped at an average level, and they could only stabilize the system, and aged they lost the country, losing to Zionism as a system.
      It remains to take a closer look at the successes of the Nazis, who, due to the education and training of young people, overtook everyone in technology and do what they want. Modern science, including Buran, is a brake, you must think for yourself to at least understand the principles of German technology. After all, they did not cease to be an adversary, and only the Kremlin surrendered.
      1. sleepy
        0
        11 June 2012 11: 43
        Quote: Volkhov.

        "... they could only stabilize the system, and having grown old they lost the country, losing to Zionism as a system."

        "I hate Soviet power"
        http://strana.lenta.ru/russia/chubais.htm
        Chairman of the Board of RUSNANO, former Chairman of the Board of RAO UES of Russia, former First Deputy Prime Minister and simply Deputy Prime Minister, former Minister of Finance, former head of the presidential administration, former head of the State Property Committee, head of the election headquarters of Boris Yeltsin in 1996, one from the founders of the party "Union of Right Forces" and others ...
  15. Sehiru san
    +2
    10 June 2012 15: 07
    The famous "Lapot" wink
  16. +5
    10 June 2012 15: 20
    “At present, something has moved in this direction: Roskosmos has announced a competition for the creation of a reusable manned spacecraft of a new generation. It is being created for transport and technical maintenance of manned orbital stations and other objects of the near-earth orbital group.
    The Clipper project is already under development. It is designed not only to enter orbit, but also to fly to the Moon. The Clipper is a six-seater reusable spacecraft launched with the Energia launch vehicle. "
    ... And the patron knows everything, understands everything, knows everything, but it's late ... Of course, it's better late than never, but we are terribly behind the amers - will we catch up? It is very unlikely - we do not have science, we do not and will not have a cadre of workers with the required qualifications (do you remember what we are about to have with education?). And finally, I especially "liked" the fact that after the termination of the Buran project, the Americans very soon got everything the same as ours. Sad and hopeless ...
  17. +7
    10 June 2012 17: 05
    Here, purely in life, terribly interesno what ... they covered the article.
    Who, even the memory of the cosmic history of Russia, was across his throat?
    It is a pity there is no service showing: Who is HU ?! Personally !!!

    For the Great Power! For Russia ! It was, is and will be forever and ever !!!
    1. snek
      +3
      10 June 2012 20: 29
      I didn’t minus the article, but a lot of mistakes are evident when reading. For instance:
      who was called the shuttle hunter.

      Who called it that if the project (as described further in the article) was closed in the 76th, and the first shuttle flew only in the 81st?
      It was a warship for war in the atmosphere and space.

      And how would he fight in the atmosphere?
      etc. The pluses and minuses in theory do not evaluate what the article is about, but how it is written (at least I do so)
      1. +1
        11 June 2012 12: 25
        Quote: snek
        when reading a bunch of blunders is striking.


        Right.
        They speak of EPOS and BOR as if we had already completed ships, and the evil Grechko buried them with a stroke of the pen.
        But everything was much more complicated.
        Here http://www.buran.ru/htm/spiral.htm the epic "Spiral" is described in sufficient detail.
  18. Kolchak
    0
    10 June 2012 20: 00
    useful car
  19. mind1954
    +1
    10 June 2012 21: 01
    It was a typical OLA! Then they were all addicted!
    I remember photographs in "AW", how ours caught it.
  20. +5
    10 June 2012 21: 19
    Yes. during the Soviet Union, such a start was made that we still use it. What do you think this western rag-tag was in vain for education? No, gentlemen, it’s not in vain. They make of us. So that we are not able to make a breakthrough again. Well, the difference in education can be judged even by the site's comments. Where is our great and mighty Russian language? And the fact that the United States uses our developments, so for this, the so-called restructuring was used. I still remember how the defense industry was transferred to the production of civilian products. I also remember the titanium shovels. No wonder "Marked" does not live in misery sitting behind the cordon and yanking from there. Eeee xxx! Sincerely.
  21. Stasi.
    +5
    10 June 2012 22: 38
    The collapse of the country and all science began Khrushchev, after the death of Stalin. Khrushchev was poorly educated, but very ambitious and cunning. Someone promoted him to power, someone was profitable to put such a man at the head of state and party. Khrushchev is characterized by one example. When the Germans rushed to Stalingrad and the bombing began, he ordered the civilian population not to leave Stalingrad, and he fled to the other side of the Volga. Stalin wanted to shoot him for this, but the whole Politburo stood up for him. And he survived. The consequences of his reign are known. So Gorbachev, Yeltsin and all the others had a worthy forerunner who laid the foundation for the death of the Union.
    1. +2
      11 June 2012 06: 25
      Stasi.,
      I fully support my colleague! This female dog is only late for 20 congresses and his slops poured on him to Stalin and it’s not too late to execute him after death. All the truth about him is on TV and the Internet! And the first channel still shows films about him! Ugh!
  22. Oleg 11111
    +1
    11 June 2012 00: 19
    http://airbase.ru/books/authors/rus/a/afanasiev-i-b/unknown_spaceships/4/
    article about the Spiral Space System
  23. +4
    11 June 2012 02: 39
    Since the 90s, Americans freely exported tons of classified documents from our country with the permission of our good authorities, simultaneously agreeing on the destruction of production and development on this, many officials heated their hands.
  24. sonovlad
    +2
    11 June 2012 03: 40
    Buran software was written in Fortran
  25. Eric
    +3
    11 June 2012 09: 35
    I saw the eyes of Lozino-Lozinsky when he was giving an interview to one of the correspondents. Our military father of outer space had tears in his eyes. That's what was scary for me. It's a shame and scary.
  26. +2
    11 June 2012 15: 38
    Forgive me, but what year is this article?
    the Clipper project is closed.
    In the article, I found several inaccuracies, or not understanding of the issue by the author.
    You can put cons, but the article does not bring anything new, but it can be misleading.