New Pentagon budget. War against all

29
In the Russian media, the new US military budget was quick to christen "anti-Russian." However, this is only partly true: it is “anti-Russian” as far as America itself is anti-Russian. There are not so many special anti-Russian articles in this project. Although this, in general, is not at all easier.

The total US defense budget for 2019 year will be 716 billion dollars. This, of course, is a very large amount. But some experts, including American ones, believe that in view of inflation, he does not even reach some records of the past.





From the fact that the new budget is really anti-Russian, we can note the following.

4,6 billion dollars allocated to the "European Initiative containment." Given the fact that, apart from Russia, there is no one to restrain in Europe, it is clear to whom and for what these funds will go. For example, Balts will get 100 million dollars for "increased defense capability." In itself, this is like a dead poultice, but in the total mass of efforts to counter Moscow this sum may have some value.

250 million dollars promised to Ukraine. However, here, as they say, there is one nuance: Kiev will receive this money only after a report to the Senate by US Secretary of Defense James Mattis. And even then, only if he confirms that the Maidanian leadership of Ukraine spends the money previously allocated for its intended purpose, and not plunder it.

This fad is very symptomatic. Money is already allocated quite a bit, and there is also an officially expressed doubt about the corruption impeccability of the current Ukrainian leaders. And if the media continues to shake up scandals related to corruption in Ukraine, then money can flow away, and the scandal will reach a very serious level.

It is clear that political motives may outweigh any charges. But we must not forget that American politicians, even presidents, are terribly afraid of their congressmen and senators. Investigation into some of these representative bodies of the government, as is known, sometimes led to impeachment. And how many politicians it cost a career - without thinking you can’t even say ...

The really serious anti-Russian point of the new military budget is allocations for the development of low-power nuclear weapons.

Yes, no matter how anyone relates to this, there is only one explanation for such a move: the United States took note of Russia's readiness to handle a limited nuclear conflict in Europe. Formally, this is tied to alleged violations of the INF Treaty by Russia, but the Americans have so far failed to prove these violations. But the desire to somehow arrest the superiority of Russia in tactical nuclear warheads, and at the same time scare Moscow by the presence of a nuclear at the European theater weapons low power, which in the event of anything can be in the hands of the same Poles, they can be traced clearly. Let me remind you that this year the Americans have already begun work on the modernization of the free-fall nuclear bomb B61, which should go into mass production as early as 2020.

Another budget item provides for the allocation of funds for the design and construction of new icebreakers!

You must admit that it is very difficult to imagine that these icebreakers will be used for combat operations against Canada. Or that they will find use in the Persian Gulf against Iran. Or in the South China Sea ... It is unlikely that several other types of ships are in demand there.

So, one thing remains - Russia. And it is the most northern of its waters. I (the author) now remembered furious comments on my previous article on the probable blockade of Russian ports. Here you have a "spherical horse in a vacuum." Americans know nothing about horses and even icebreakers are preparing for a possible aggravation of relations. Although in the comments to this article it is possible to prove that I am wrong again, and the Iranian coast is about to be knocked down by mighty meter ices ...

Sorry for the slight lyrical digression. We continue.

Probably, a detailed analysis of the Pentagon’s new budget has some independent value. But (let's be frank) except for professionals. It is enough for an ordinary man in the street in parallel how many thousands of soldiers the American army will increase, how many percent their salary will grow and how much money will go to support the Pentagon’s apparatus itself.

Therefore, we note only some points that are interesting both in their own right and in connection with certain geopolitical circumstances.

For example, it is very interesting and significant that the senators and congressmen officially forbade their military to deliver F-35 fighters to Turkey. True, not for good, but until the Pentagon studies all the consequences of Ankara’s purchase of the Russian C-400 air defense system.

It is safe to say that this will not definitely improve the US-Turkish relations. And given the role that Turkey plays in NATO and in the geopolitical alignments at the southern borders of Russia, this item can even be called frankly pro-Russian and more than compensating for all the truly anti-Russian budget items mentioned above.

Another interesting article of the new budget is “overcoming the crisis in the military aviation"! The funds allocated for this program will mainly go to the repair and modernization of fourth-generation aircraft, the average age of which has exceeded 26 years. Given the very high load on the US Air Force, this is a lot, and many planes really need additional measures to ensure their combat effectiveness.

Probably, we should not be misled by the title of this article - the US Air Force is still a very formidable force. And, nevertheless, it is pleasant to note that things are not as smooth with a potential opponent as he sometimes tries to demonstrate ...

Also allocated funds for the purchase of X-NUMX fighter F-77. There is nothing unexpected in this, but somehow it is not very pleasant to realize that “the complete failure of the American military industrial complex”, as some of our patriots call it, is in demand by the American army and goes into series, and “unparalleled in the world” Su-35 is so probably will remain a small-scale model of military equipment, which is in demand only at parades and air shows.

Sad citizens, ...

Probably, we still should not call this US military budget "anti-Russian." Anti-Russian there is "not much more" than usual. And certainly not more so than anti-Chinese or anti-Iranian.

Moreover, there is nothing revolutionary or unexpected in it.

It’s just a very large budget of a very dangerous country actively preparing for a world war for global leadership. And it is from this that we should proceed.

And what conclusions to draw from this, the case is exclusively personal. The most reasonable conclusion, in my opinion: if we want peace, then preparations for war should still be accelerated ...
29 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    16 August 2018 05: 42
    If the money that the United States spends on the war goes to the stupid for the needs of the population of the countries against which it is all being waged ... It seems to me .... Or rather, I'm sure ... An American flag will hang in every house ...
    1. +10
      16 August 2018 06: 07
      The most reasonable conclusion, in my opinion: if we want peace, then preparations for war should still be accelerated ...
      to develop "armature-2", "SU-51", destroyers "leader-2" ... Yes Tell Borisov ... he doesn’t need all this.
    2. +3
      16 August 2018 06: 08
      Quote: Vard
      Rather, I'm sure ... An American flag will hang in every house ...

      Well, apiece of bucks, I have a striped flag, I’m unlikely to hang it. But for 700 yards, greening the Sahara, and relieving the overpopulation of some regions of the planet, is quite realistic wink
    3. +7
      16 August 2018 06: 10
      Quote: Vard
      ...... direct in a dull country for the needs of the population of the countries, g ...
      Enough part of this money should be directed to the needs of higher officials --- that’s the state flag in their soul. And your home, or mine ---- the states are not interested.
    4. 0
      16 August 2018 06: 32
      Quote: Vard
      An American flag will hang in every house ...

      No, I’d better put this rag instead of a rug. feel
    5. +1
      16 August 2018 08: 38
      That seems to me .... Rather, I'm sure.

      In vain it seems to you, and even more so in vain sure.
      700 000 000 000: 140 000 000 = 5 000
      You’re just cheap, for five pieces of greens you sold your Motherland. fool
    6. +2
      16 August 2018 10: 54
      Quote: Vard
      Rather, I'm sure ... An American flag will hang in every house ...

      Can I immediately give flags? And then no one will change money for flags. winked
      1. -2
        16 August 2018 20: 38
        Tak kak U Amerov deneg malo nujno samim dat Amerom v dolg. Piryod Nabiulina kupi Amerikanskie tcennie paper.
  2. -1
    16 August 2018 06: 13
    States anti-Russian country. Oh, America. tomato juice...
  3. +12
    16 August 2018 06: 26
    But in fact, what did the authors of the show of colorful cartoons of a missile strike on Florida want? Their undertaking was completely successful. Those whom they wanted to troll instead of having a fun laugh for some reason increased the military budget. As D.A. Medvedev proudly said: “The ring around our country begins to shrink”
    1. 0
      16 August 2018 11: 31
      Let them increase the budget. Let the fleet, planes, and tanks continue to be built. They have unlimited money.
    2. +3
      16 August 2018 23: 30
      Quote: Deck
      But in fact, what did the authors of the show of colorful cartoons of a missile strike on Florida want? Their undertaking was completely successful.

      For the Ams, these "cartoons" came as a complete surprise ... And this is "at the turn of the decision" ... The fact is that 2020, according to the General Staff of the RF Armed Forces, is the year of the decision to apply "instant ( disarming) global strike "on the Russian Federation. And now you need to re-count the potentials, probabilities, checkmate expectation of hit targets on your territory ... No ICE!
      Moreover, the Amy could not have foreseen our rapprochement with China so quickly. Well, Trump’s stupid thing was a trade war with the EEC and China, a way out of a nuclear deal with Iran.
      Once again we were stunned by the rolling of our Tu-22m3m ... 4 Dagger in the bomb bay - this is serious for any AUG.
      Therefore, we are doing everything to "shake" the confidence of the exceptional in their invincibility ... And this is extremely unpleasant to realize ... therefore they are trying to sound the alarm with the money ... in the absence of breakthrough ideas.
      Somehow, however.
  4. +3
    16 August 2018 06: 39
    this US military budget should not be called "anti-Russian." There is "not much more" anti-Russian there than usual. And even more so than anti-Chinese or anti-Iranian
    Yes, of course, one should not call it either anti-Russian or anti-Chinese ... The Americans are increasing their budget to prepare for probably repelling aliens who are about to begin an invasion of the United States. The states are probably not at all interested in countries that can militarily resist them, they probably do not want to show the whole world who should be considered the master in the "house".
    As for the icebreakers, this is not a confirmation of your author's assumption about the blockade of Russian ports, but a necessary step to build up your (American) presence in the Arctic, to which there is a very high interest. Or maybe the Americans for their military needs will rent icebreakers from Russia?
  5. +3
    16 August 2018 07: 51
    Such a lot of money, but for peaceful purposes ... Yes, where can it be ... Yes, it’s not realistic .. The military-industrial complex will die of hunger ...
    1. -1
      17 August 2018 01: 07
      Quote: parusnik
      Such a lot of money, but for peaceful purposes ... Yes, where can it be ... Yes, it’s not realistic .. The military-industrial complex will die of hunger ...

      Well, both China and Russia spend a lot, so as they say start with yourself and your own example ....
  6. +5
    16 August 2018 08: 03
    711 billion is a very large amount, but ... in relation to the US GDP is not at the forefront. On tighter medicine or education, they spend many times more.

    1. -1
      16 August 2018 19: 37
      The vast majority of leaders are countries in the Middle East, where the war almost never ends. Actually, there the level of development stopped in the Middle Ages in most countries. Therefore, to follow them in this indicator is stupid. Yes, and the military budget is more logical to compare in absolute terms, to fight with real planes / tanks / missiles, rather than abstract percent of GDP
  7. 0
    16 August 2018 08: 20
    Quote: Choi
    They spend several times more on the same medicine or education.


    Amerikosy, unlike us, are systematically pursuing an anti-people policy!
    1. +3
      16 August 2018 23: 44
      Quote: Deck
      Amerikosy, unlike us, are systematically pursuing an anti-people policy!

      That's only AGIPROP does not need to be included in the VO! Instead of slogans, facts and comments are better. Preferably new and little known. AHA.
      1. 0
        21 August 2018 06: 55
        Instead of slogans, facts and comments are better.


        Easy! According to Speaker Volodin, the desire to receive his pension after increasing the retirement age will force Russians to go in for sports, which will lead to respect for life expectancy. The vile Americans on the contrary: with a social pension of 87 rubles, they begin to suffer from obesity and men quickly die at 000, 76 years. Aha
    2. +2
      17 August 2018 01: 12
      Quote: Deck
      Quote: Choi
      They spend several times more on the same medicine or education.

      Amerikosy, unlike us, are systematically pursuing an anti-people policy!


      Because of the cartel, their insurance is very expensive for medicine, but everything else ... You still need to learn from them how they support their own producer and the progressive tax system. A very good program of cheap housing at fixed prices for renting and much more, so that agitation now does not channel in times of access to information then.
  8. +1
    16 August 2018 10: 56
    after all, we should not call this US military budget "anti-Russian." Anti-Russian there "not much more"
    The author knows how to put him into a dead end ... Now I’ll break my whole head, but against whom then?
    1. 0
      17 August 2018 01: 17
      Quote: Nikolai Nikolayevich
      after all, we should not call this US military budget "anti-Russian." Anti-Russian there "not much more"
      The author knows how to put him into a dead end ... Now I’ll break my whole head, but against whom then?

      Well, they just can afford it, but as you know With the help of Colt and a kind word, you can achieve much more than just one kind word.
  9. 0
    16 August 2018 10: 57
    Trump is ours (one hundred pounds). The US war against everyone is exactly what is needed. There is an opportunity to lead these "all".
  10. +2
    16 August 2018 16: 46
    Quote: Andrey Yurievich
    to develop "armature-2", "SU-51", destroyers "leader-2" ...

    -------------------
    Produce.
  11. +2
    16 August 2018 16: 47
    Quote: Deck
    Amerikosy, unlike us, are systematically pursuing an anti-people policy!

    ---------------------------
    On the contrary. Trump wants to bring industry back to the country. And he does it.
  12. -1
    16 August 2018 18: 52
    Quote: Altona
    Quote: Deck
    Amerikosy, unlike us, are systematically pursuing an anti-people policy!

    ---------------------------
    On the contrary. Trump wants to bring industry back to the country. And he does it.

    And yet America has chosen a dead end path of development and is pushing other countries into this dead end, some are opposed to this. For such people, America’s military power exists, but its use only accelerates the movement to the abyss.
    1. +2
      17 August 2018 01: 19
      Quote: Vlad5307
      dead end

      why is it dead end?
      Quote: Vlad5307
      For such people, America’s military power exists, but its use only accelerates the movement to the abyss.

      and what is this abyss?
  13. +1
    17 August 2018 11: 24
    The US military budget is not terrible because it’s some kind of "anti-Russian", but because it is more than 2,5 the entire budget of the Russian Federation. hi