The first serious test for Moscow and Damascus in the enclave war and the secret of US iron calm

37


For more than half a year, we observed a glorious picture of the liberation by the forces of the Syrian government forces of Eastern Guta, Duma, Dumeirah, Jairud and Rant boilers, as well as Yarmuk from the oppositional terrorist units of the Free Syrian Army, the Dzhebhat an-Nusra formations (banned in Russia ), as well as groups of jihadists of ISIS (prohibited in the Russian Federation). As a result of lengthy and tense negotiations, the majority of the militant opposition managed to be forced to put down weaponand then, together with their families, take them out on "green buses" to the "Idlib viper" controlled by the Turkish army in the case of the FSA, or to the deserted tactical cauldron between Palmyra and Deir ez-Zor - in the case of the Igil jihadists. Those most radical remnants of the enemy’s formations that refused to follow the voluntary withdrawal scheme were suppressed during the many-day fire work of the Syrian Arab army artillery units, moving deeper into the enclaves of the Tiger Force assault groups, as well as due to regular point-and-point missile and bomb attacks on fortified areas militants tactical aviation Russian Aerospace Forces, the basis of which continues to be the front-line fighter-bomber Su-34.



But let's not forget that even with such favorable factors based on the lack of support for jihadi boilers from the outside, the stripping process of each quarter of the above enclaves advanced extremely slowly and far from losslessly in the ranks of the government forces of Syria, Hezbollah, and Al-Quds. This is due to the enormous time of existence of these enclaves, during which the opposition and terrorist detachments managed, first, to build several powerful and flexible defense lines formed by groups of thousands of 3 — 5-storey wooden buildings interconnected in the most complex dense residential area. bridges for the operational redistribution of firing points depending on the tactical situation (mainly concerns Yarmuk), secondly, to create a multitude of fortified areas at numerous dominant heights in paradise not Jayrud and Al-Rastan.

Today, we will return to the analysis of the military-political and operational-tactical situation around the so-called Dar'a-Essaweida-Quneitra de-escalation triangle, which is actually the last territorial rudiment of the enclave war in the Syrian Arab Republic. In order to liberate this territory, which extends 119 km northwest of the Jordanian village of El Maftra to the settlement of Druze Majdal Shams (on the Golan Heights), the command of the CAA plans to use all the most combat-ready attack units. The only uncertainty is the participation of the elite squad of Special Forces of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps "Quds", whose presence in the south of Syria is extremely unhappy with the Israeli side due to the fact that almost every artillery or air strike at their positions and locations of Hezbollah floats to completely objective and worthy countermeasures in the form of a missile-artillery "response" against IDF support forces in the Golan.

The Quds unit is capable of serving an excellent service as an addition to the tactical skills of the Syrian brigade “Liva al-Quds”, as well as all of the CAA assault units active in the Dar'y and Quneitra areas. But his actions in the liberation of the South-West of the SAR are now in doubt against the background of negotiations between Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu and Israeli Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman, during which Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov declared that “non-military forces in the Dar-A region are inadmissible government troops SAR. " In parallel with this statement, the Flightradar24 online traffic monitor could see the arrival of two Iranian passenger airliners at Damascus airport: “Boeing 747-2J9F” from Saha Airlines and Airbus A310-304 from Mahan Air. It is obvious that it was on these sides that the main units of the “Quds” were removed from the southern regions of the republic within the framework of the Israeli-Russian agreements.

Here we can state the only moment: Moscow signed up under the temporary "expulsion" of Iranian advisers and IRGC units only so that Tel Aviv does not have a single argument in favor of supporting the FSA and "al-Nusra" militants in the Israeli-Syrian border on the moment of the antiterrorist operation. Therefore, the stripping period must be noticeably accelerated. But here the question arises: in Israel alone is the root of the problems of liberating the opposition stronghold around the city of Dar'a? Naturally not.

An even more serious problem is coming to the fore - the presence of the 80-kilometer section of the Syrian-Jordanian border, through which the militants in the de-escalation triangle can not only receive regular support in the form of new “cannon-fodder”, which the British and American military contingents are training in training camps near At-Tanfa and Er-Rukban, but fed by new weapons from the States directly through transshipment points in the United Arab Emirates and Qatar, which ervuyu all considered air base of Al-Jafr and al-Udeid. Already, the number of FSA militants in the southern semi-fleet is estimated at 17 — 20, thousands of militants who possess a tactically thought-out network of fortified areas at 25 heights belonging to the area.

Also in favor of the militants plays and protectorate of Washington, which was designated in a statement the head of the press service of the US State Department Heather Nauert for 26 May 2018 of the year. A high-ranking official from the United States Foreign Office reported on the use of "decisive appropriate measures" against Damascus in the event of an attempt to assault the militants in the southern semi-craft. The fact is that this terrorist bridgehead is the Pentagon’s latest tool in a hybrid confrontation with the Syrian Arab army, as well as subversive activities on the west bank of the Euphrates, while the FSA in the 55-kilometer “security zone” around At-Tanfa is viewed by Moscow and Damascus as a force fully controlled by the headquarters of the Western coalition, an attack on the part of which can be regarded as direct aggression from the American side. Here the State Department struggles and bites into almost every step of the Syrian army, aimed at liberating this territory.

At the same time, as an argument about the inadmissibility of a military operation against militants near Dar'a, the United States uses a ceasefire agreement within the Dar'a-Essaweida-Quneitra triangle, signed between representatives of Russia, USA and Jordan 7 July 2017 of the year and 9 entered into force July from 12: 00 Damascus time. Despite the fact that the agreement that came into force was announced even by American President Donald Trump during a meeting with Russian leader Vladimir Putin on the margins of the G20 summit, the American side was not able to keep the opposition and terrorist detachments from regular shelling of the positions of the Syrian Arab Army. in the cities of Khan Arnabah, Dar'a, as well as in numerous localities near the contact line. Consequently, there are no grounds for the preservation of the bridgehead of the aggressor, neither in Russia nor in Syria.

As "decisive measures," the State Department and the Pentagon may well consider launching bombing raids on the units of the SAA participating in the attack on the pseudo-de-escalation triangle. In this case, it is necessary to count on a sufficient number of Buk-M2E anti-aircraft missile divisions and the Pantsir-C1 anti-aircraft missile and artillery systems deployed in the combat area; with their help, most of the elements of high-precision weapons of American fleet and the Air Force (Tomahawks, JASSM-ER, etc.) will be intercepted. But there is also a no less significant threat - the likelihood that the American army will use 155 mm M777 howitzers firing guided M982 Excalibur shells from the territory of Jordan, to which M109A6 Paladin self-propelled guns can be connected, as well as high-precision MLRS multiple launch rocket systems and HIMARS. And the hedgehog is understandable that in this situation, the Shells will be able to destroy only a small part of the Excaliburs and a slightly larger number of missiles of the M26 / 30 family, while the rest will safely reach their targets.

Continuing the attack on the well-trained and armed FSA semi-mob with artillery support from the American side can turn into a living hell for the Syrian army, which means that the antiterrorist operation in three southwestern provinces becomes completely and completely unpromising: it will only draw government forces into a long and exhausting regional conflict. There is also a radical option - the counter-battery work of Syrian artillerymen on the firing positions of the American army in Jordan with the use of Krasnopol-М2, or "uncovering" and using against the aggressor "Points-U" and other types of missile weapons. But will Moscow and Damascus have enough of this military-political will? Unlikely. This is what distinguishes the release of tactical boilers detached and cut off from American support in the depths of Syrian territory from the suppression of a powerful border bridgehead located in the enemy’s barrel and reactive artillery, as well as having the possibility of permanent military support through the “passing” southern border. Obviously one thing: the confrontation for the return of the south-western lands of the SAR under state sovereignty will be one of the most difficult stages in the Syrian military campaign.

Information sources:
http://tass.ru/politika/5251624
https://riafan.ru/1062048-lavrov-predlagaet-vyvesti-iz-sirii-vse-inostrannye-sily-or-30-maya-or-utro-or-sobytiya-dnya-or-fan-tv
https://syria.liveuamap.com/
37 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +14
    1 June 2018 05: 41
    One thing is clear that we can’t turn back already. From the very beginning it was clear that we could not do with the physical destruction of the supposedly “Islamic state.” This was a project of the oil magnates of the Middle East and the USA. Therefore, they will use it in full, and constantly change his skin. I fully agree with the author of the article.
    1. dSK
      +4
      1 June 2018 06: 37
      Quote: Mar. Tira
      project of oil tycoons of the Middle East and the USA.

      Who benefits from the elimination of Assad? First of all, to Israel. The activity of his "diplomatic missions" to Russia is growing.
      1. +2
        1 June 2018 09: 22
        Quote from dsk
        Who benefits from the elimination of Assad? First of all, to Israel. The activity of his "diplomatic missions" to Russia is growing.

        No, weak Assad is beneficial to us. By the way, weak Assad is beneficial to Russia. This is our commonality of interests.
    2. +6
      1 June 2018 08: 59
      with the use of Krasnopol-M2, or “uncovering” and the use of Tochk-U and other types of missile weapons against the aggressor. But is Moscow’s military-political will enough for this?

      The question of "political will" posed by Damantsev in this article constantly asks himself, each person in Russia and beyond the "hill". This, as they say, is the question of questions
    3. 0
      1 June 2018 20: 36
      all day this pin_day hangs on the front page and why is it?
  2. +5
    1 June 2018 06: 40
    ... will be one of the most difficult stages in the Syrian military campaign
    And in this BV boiler (Syria), each stage is complex, and most importantly, so far the Americans with their allies do not see the end of this military company.
  3. +4
    1 June 2018 06: 53
    There is also a radical option - the counter-battery work of the Syrian artillery on the firing positions of the American army in Jordan using the Krasnopol-M2, or the "uncovering" and use of the Tochk-U and other types of missile weapons against the aggressor.
    This is not a radical option. Radical - burn out the territory controlled by the FSA using the ODAB and other similar weapons. Bandos, "fighting" for the money themselves will run away, if they have time.
    1. +2
      1 June 2018 22: 15
      A tourniquet, and a good tourniquet, but so far no one has fled, so you need to burn more.
  4. +3
    1 June 2018 07: 51
    The Americans from Syria will not leave, the US has recently fed wars ... There will be no local conflicts, the US economy will have difficulties ...
    1. 0
      1 June 2018 18: 23
      Quote: parusnik
      There will be no local conflicts, the US economy will have difficulties ...

      Justify this assumption. What is your conclusion based on?
  5. +4
    1 June 2018 10: 04
    Of course, much has been said about the political will of Moscow and Washington ... On the whole, the Syrian armed forces controlled by Assad have also looked not bad lately ... But will anyone eventually offer the broad masses in the Russian Federation an economic justification for our assistance to Assad and the Syrian people? Who will calculate how much money has been invested (although it is probably not difficult at the moment at the moment) where is it more interesting to find out how much money we still plan to invest? And it’s even more interesting to know what is the profit from this war for the Russian Federation, especially when you consider that it would be necessary to calculate the possible profit and assess the risks of the phrase “possible profit”? While all this looks like a humanitarian action ... am
    1. +5
      1 June 2018 10: 58
      It's time to think rationally)
      with words about fraternal help to the fraternal people, "you will not give up."
      Of course, no one will give direct numbers and the point is not in them, but in the geopolitical situation, in my opinion.
      It is more important here to indicate one’s position, to visually show the collective West that Syria is a red line for Russia and no matter how much money it would take to invest.
      It's like children, or elderly parents, now there is no “benefit” from them, but in the future everything will probably pay off handsomely and not only financially.
      Indeed, in fights for friends, we are also a mountain.
      1. +2
        1 June 2018 22: 29
        No need to project human relations on states ... Friends ... Not friends ... What kind of kindergarten ...? States have no friends ... There are temporary allies of interest.
    2. +3
      1 June 2018 18: 27
      Quote: Alex2048
      economic justification

      we have BMTO in Tartus. no Assad - no base.
      no Assad - there is Qatari gas in Europe.
      no Assad - there are many "Ishilovites".
      1. +1
        1 June 2018 22: 22
        I'm talking about numbers ... And not about geopolitics ... How much money did we possibly receive in the budget ...? It’s difficult to calculate well in the budget ... How much money did Gazprom and Rosneft receive? And whether Assad is present or not, Assad does not matter now because there is no pipe for Qatari gas ... But there are Russian troops in Syria or not for the budget of the Russian Federation.
      2. 0
        1 June 2018 22: 25
        There are many or few ISIS in Syria do not care ... After all, do you care how many terrorists in Africa? how many drug dealers in south america? A lot of ISIS is not a justification ... How much would it cost to strengthen customs control in the Russian Federation? How much would a border reinforcement cost? I think the numbers can be comparable ... laughing
    3. +1
      4 June 2018 21: 25
      A lot has already been written about this. I like the version that they were going to take away the European gas market from Russia by stretching a pipeline from Saudi Arabia. Apparently at the top they counted and decided that it would be cheaper to send troops and help Assad to stay.
  6. 0
    1 June 2018 12: 08
    Quote: alexsipin
    Quote from dsk
    Who benefits from the elimination of Assad? First of all, to Israel. The activity of his "diplomatic missions" to Russia is growing.

    No, weak Assad is beneficial to us. By the way, weak Assad is beneficial to Russia. This is our commonality of interests.

    On the contrary.
    Strong Syria is also needed by Israel.
    Unless, of course, the goal is constant instability in the region and continued "feeding" by the United States.
    Russia also needs strong power in Syria ..
    There will be strong Syria, there will be neither Hamas nor the IRGC or other inadequately motivated structures on its territory.
    And Russia and Israel and the entire BV is at hand.
    The only player who is not interested in this is the United States.
    1. 0
      1 June 2018 18: 23
      Quote: Livonetc
      There will be strong Syria, there will be neither Hamas nor the IRGC or other inadequately motivated structures on its territory.

      For this, Syria needs to make a very steep turn, like Sadat in the early 70s. With the same consequences for Russia. I don’t think Assad is ready for it.
  7. +1
    1 June 2018 14: 59
    It is difficult to be in one person a friend of Israel, to avoid confrontation with America, to stand at the head of Russia and try to achieve the outcome of the Syrian confrontation in their favor. True, there are 2 ways out - war or shame.
    What the leader of Russia will choose is far from obvious ...
    1. 0
      3 June 2018 12: 22
      Surrender to Syria = surrender to Russia. And we, the people of Russia, are obliged to inform the guarantor that even the most naive people who gave their votes to him did not vote for the surrender of Russia, not to mention the very considerable number of Russian citizens who voted for Grudinin (certainly, this was much more eleven%).
  8. +1
    1 June 2018 18: 14
    The farther, the not clear, why are we there and to what limits?
  9. 0
    1 June 2018 20: 55
    Yes, as with the Donbass, they will stop on half measures, hanging their heads ((((
  10. +1
    1 June 2018 23: 39
    It’s not VO, but Ren-TV of some kind with conspiracy theories, liquid reptiloids that they just forgot with nibira.
    1. 0
      3 June 2018 12: 18
      And Ren-TV, if we discard advertising tricks about reptilians and aliens, is a perfectly sane channel, my friend.
  11. +2
    2 June 2018 03: 04
    any weapon must be uncovered to achieve the goal - the liberation of Syria. It’s not very important for us, but to defeat the United States in this theater of operations is a qualitative change in the situation in general in B. Vostok. But Russia needs this if it aims to devalue the efforts of the West to isolate us in Europe, breaking into the Iran-Iraq-Syria corridor with the further development of transport corridors through Pakistan to India and the Indian Ocean. This is the prospect and priority of Russian policy for the next 25-30 years, on the implementation of which the position and fate of Russia and its allies depends. The time has come to beat the Americans, sophisticatedly, by any methods and forces, without wasting time and not letting go of the initiative.
    1. 0
      3 June 2018 12: 16
      Necessarily necessary, but by the forces that are now in Syria, this is impossible, almost impossible.
  12. 0
    3 June 2018 12: 15
    Everything is just beginning. And the result will be positive for Syria and Russia only with the firm and tough stance of Moscow. Otherwise, defeat and shame with the subsequent approach of bandits to Transcaucasia.
  13. +1
    3 June 2018 14: 43
    Quote: Chertt
    with the use of Krasnopol-M2, or “uncovering” and the use of Tochk-U and other types of missile weapons against the aggressor. But is Moscow’s military-political will enough for this?

    The question of "political will" posed by Damantsev in this article constantly asks himself, each person in Russia and beyond the "hill". This, as they say, is the question of questions

    - How many oligophrenics are there with whom official propaganda has pushed into softened brains, as if the Russian armed forces would be able to seriously measure pipelines in Syria with the US military machine! In the course of real clashes! laughing Well, guys, October’s, you’re so completely “inspired” by the militaristic psychosis that you believe in all shit that you are "hanged on the ears" ... wassat
    1. 0
      4 June 2018 13: 25
      Quote: Outsider
      How many oligophrenics are there, with whom official propaganda has pushed into softened brains, as if the Russian armed forces would be able to seriously measure pipelines in Syria with the US military machine!

      In percentage terms, we have less in our country than in your country. In addition, the term "oligfrenes" you used is, to put it mildly, redundant and not accurate.
  14. +1
    3 June 2018 14: 47
    Quote: Fayter2017
    It's time to think rationally)
    with words about fraternal help to the fraternal people, "you will not give up."
    Of course, no one will give direct numbers and the point is not in them, but in the geopolitical situation, in my opinion.
    It is more important here to indicate one’s position, to visually show the collective West that Syria is a red line for Russia and no matter how much money it would take to invest.
    It's like children, or elderly parents, now there is no “benefit” from them, but in the future everything will probably pay off handsomely and not only financially.
    Indeed, in fights for friends, we are also a mountain.

    - How can the half-dead Assad, who has a small part left from Syria, where almost half a trillion dollars is required to restore the balances, from which the oil-bearing regions were taken, become an "effective investment" ??
  15. 0
    3 June 2018 14: 52
    Continuing the attack on the well-trained and armed half-boiler FSA with artillery support from the American side can turn into a hell for the Syrian army, which means that the anti-terrorist operation in the three southwestern provinces becomes completely and futile: it will only draw government forces into a long exhausting regional conflict. There is also a radical option - the counter-battery work of the Syrian artillery on the firing positions of the American army in Jordan using the Krasnopol-M2, or the "uncovering" and use of the Tochk-U and other types of missile weapons against the aggressor. But will Moscow and Damascus have enough of this military-political will? Unlikely.

    - Well, Damantsev, well, an eagle! Still, he proposes that Russia begin a war with the US armed forces in the Middle East! laughing lol fool
    1. 0
      4 June 2018 13: 50
      Outsider, we will start with the use of nuclear weapons. So happy?
  16. DPN
    0
    4 June 2018 06: 51
    If you climbed, then you need to finish! or get out if we are afraid of the USA.
  17. +2
    4 June 2018 12: 26
    "And a hedgehog it is clear that in this situation, the Shells will be able to destroy only a small part of the Excaliburs and a slightly larger number of rockets of the M26 / 30 family
    I agree completely, but for this you can use other means, installations like "Mercury", for example ... She even took part in the Victory Parade (St. Petersburg). At the same time, new equipment in the field would be tested.
  18. 0
    4 June 2018 18: 45
    Passing east Dumeir. I read on signs like DUMAR. East Dumeir is mountainous, and very mountainous
  19. 0
    5 June 2018 07: 55
    Quote: NEOZ
    Justify this assumption. What is your conclusion based on?

    ----------------------------
    Creating your own investment attractiveness as a “quiet backwater”, selling weapons to warring and “intimidated” parties, “peacekeeping” diplomacy to strengthen your own authority, weakening countries in the conflict zone and so on.