Something about economics
True, the economy of the USSR could not compete with the economy of the West, it is so. But a natural question arises: why did the USSR economy hold out and even defeated the European one during the great crisis of 1941-1945? Many well-known economists of the West in their works directly write that if Russia had been tsarist, pre-revolutionary at the beginning of the 40-ies, it would have come to an end during the Nazi invasion.
The Soviet economy, both pre-war and during the bloody war, acted without fail. Even the fact that part of the country was under occupation was not particularly affected by her work. Western economic geniuses have concluded that the Soviet planned economy is the most advanced in the world. And only she was able to withstand what she endured.
And suddenly such a paradox: the country is not at war with anyone, in fact, it is flourishing, and the whole economy has collapsed! What's the matter? The fact is that she was helped to fall apart. If so, then who? It is clear that those who managed it. As the proverb says, the fish is always rotting from the head.
Only for some reason, under Joseph Vissarionovich, this “head” did not rot. As soon as the light smell began, he immediately cut it off. And, probably, did the right thing. Why did Stalin constantly clean the corps of his managers? Because he was forced to put on key command posts of specialists, but, by Vedic definition, people from the first upper class. Such people can follow the idea if they are managed. As soon as management weakens, they begin to get lost and slide down to the material. Academician Porshnev in his monograph on people of predatory species called such people diffusers.
But Joseph Vissarionovich had no choice. There were very few undeliverable and incorruptible, indifferent to pleasures and power, in post-revolutionary Russia. In addition, the Order through its people for each of these closely followed. And whenever possible tried to get rid of them. The masters of Western civilization in power in Soviet Russia needed corrupt lovers of pleasure, vile, envious, with criminal criminal manners. Such as in antiquity called slaves. These are easy to manage, especially through money and sex. Therefore, Stalin, talking with SM. Kirov, later with Zhdanov and other people he trusted, often said: “We’ll find the money, but where do we get the people?”
“Where do people get?” Was the main question of his life. Stalin needed managers. People from the second highest Vedic class. Such that it is impossible neither to buy, nor to intimidate, nor to deceive. But such people next to Joseph Vissarionovich was nothing at all. At first he lost Sergei Mironovich Kirov. True, fate sent him Andrei Zhdanov, but he was soon killed. Stayed true Beria. Lavrenty Pavlovich worked for ten, could do a lot. He cleared the trash Soviet NKVD. Created border troops, elite divisions of the NKVD. He mastered the atomic project and raised the Soviet rocket science to enormous heights ... And if there were ten or twenty such Beriums? But they, unfortunately, were not. There were those who only pretended to try. In fact, they were hidden enemies like Suslov, Mikoyan, Kaganovich or Khrushchev.
Under Nikita Sergeevich, unprincipled careerists entered the economy. They were not eager to organize such economic growth in the USSR so that the West would become both jealous and scary. In the Soviet Union for economic development there was everything that could be: the gigantic raw material resources, the ruble provided with gold, the hardworking people who loved their homeland ... There was everything, but there was no Stalin, a man who would organize his energy this colossus. And most importantly, I would have thrown frank thieves, embezzlers, stupid careerists out of business.
Under Stalin in the USSR, the rationalization-inventors movement was developed. That only these talented and educated people did not offer! And the state always went to meet them. But with Nikita Khrushchev, this whole movement immediately came to an end. Now thousands of amazing inventions and discoveries lay on the shelves of archives. No one interested in them anymore. The question is why?
Because the Soviet economy began to manipulate the West through dummy persons. No, not the direct agents of the special services, although there must have been such. Basically slaves, who were promoted to the stupid party functionaries. All Soviet ministries were slaughtered with similar non-pockets: down below - in factories, factories and mines - quite normal people, up above, in the ministries, - just careerists and fools. How to explain this? No way! Worked a clear selection. And the host conducted them because of the cordon. Cleverly, cleverly and competently.
Above, we wrote that our people betrayed themselves for American rags. Why did this happen? Yes, because our Soviet economy pushed him to this. Of course, it is not necessary to drop from the account and the Soviet man in the street. It was his fault that there was a great tragedy.
People ideas are never greedy for rags and trinkets. They create everything of their own, which is no worse, and even better than what they want to buy. But back again to the economy.
In 80, when the first American jeans began to appear in the Soviet Union, many ordinary people praised them so much that one could think that they were special: “Wow, American ones! From the best fabric, and rivets, rivets !!! "What are you caught? On nonsense. Is it possible that our light industry was not able to produce even the same fabric, or even better, before the importation of American coats into the USSR? Of course she could. She could do everything: make the rivets better than the American ones, and leather rivets. And the names of jeans, for example: "Siberia", "Russian North", "Golden-domed Moscow", "Veliky Novgorod", "Tashkent", etc. What prevented her? Or who prevented? It was possible to make such jeans with our resources that Americans would die of envy. For example, come up with some bronze decoration or buckles with inlaid antlers. Our horns in the north are mountains. And no one needs them. But our industry has not responded. But the same Americans could pay for our goods with currency. Now the question is: why did not react? Answers can be found a lot. And they will all be correct. And yet the main thing will remain in the shadows.
We mean the algorithm of the Soviet production. Installation of the owners of Western civilization to ensure that from Soviet raw materials all products are made much worse than Western ones. Literally everything that our industry produced, went within the framework of this secret algorithm.
That is why industrial products manufactured under Stalin still serve. Although by all standards their deadline is long over. Under Joseph Vissarionovich, the western installation did not work on our goods. Let someone from the ministry try to make the factory director produce products worse than he can. Such a minister would immediately become abreast with the enemies of the people.
Is it fair or not? Of course, fair. That is why, not trusting the ministers, Joseph Vissarionovich liked to communicate directly with the directors of factories.
That is why Stalin's Victory, Izh-54 hunting rifles, ZIL refrigerators, and much more are still working. It is enough to remember that proud of their domestic hunting weapons the British in 60-e with pleasure bought the Soviet "Izh-54" and were proud that in their hands Soviet shotguns. Here it is, what should be the Soviet production! All the best, most advanced and reliable! Our products must surpass Western. And the Soviet people have no other way. To our products with pleasure acquired by the most advanced countries of the world. Not to mention the citizens of Africa or Asia. Approximately such an installation gave the Soviet economic machine Joseph Vissarionovich. And with him everything went as it should.
But with the coming to power in the country, Nikita Khrushchev earned the algorithm of "Soviet production". Everywhere you throw, everywhere is bad. Everywhere worse than in the West. Is that the military-industrial complex somehow held on. But even Nikita Sergeyevich Khrushchev hit him. Naval first the fleetand then by aviation. Now the question is: who followed the growth and development of our Soviet science and economy? It is clear that from abroad watched. And watched carefully. But there is little to follow; Soviet economic power was skillfully restrained. Who did this?
It is clear that our own intelligence agencies and their allies in the gradual killing of the USSR from the CIA are the two most powerful intelligence agencies in the world. As Stalin liked to say: "Personnel decide everything." Here are the cadres and decided: at the head of our Soviet industry always put such people who knew how to live only for themselves and not for the people, and who understood perfectly what was required of them. It is for this reason that the Soviet Union very soon after Stalin’s death lost its leading position in the global economy and gradually turned into a raw materials appendage of the West. When L.I. Brezhnev, the USSR finally sat on the oil needle, which was just what was needed.
We now turn again to Y. Andropov. Nobody wondered why the Andropov KGB needed to introduce internal intelligence in the USSR? Just like in a foreign western country? The answer lies on the surface, you only need to think a little: in order to closely monitor the directors of Soviet enterprises, so that they do not even think to introduce into production at their own risk and risk what local talented inventors can offer them. It is clear that the "guilty" director was immediately accused of squandering public money and removed from work. Replacing, naturally, a dunce. Such a total fooling in the ministries and enterprises brought the Soviet economy to a real shock. And this was done not by some Western competitors, but by their own bastards, who after the death of Stalin and Beria, with all their might, to please the West, slowed down the development of the country.
It is clear that those figures from the KGB, who were engaged in such affairs, received a tidy sum through the web of cooperation of the special services. According to Coleman, the money came from Rockefeller Bank. It is possible that Western dollars went and went, but not in the KGB anymore, but in one of the departments in the FSB.
And now we will return to M. Gorbachev. Here A. Khinshtein and V. Medinsky in their book wrote that in the Soviet Union everything from the shops in 80's literally disappeared. They, these writers, are right. So it was. But the question is why disappeared? And all at once: and essential goods, and food?
A paradoxical situation arose: the plants were working with might and main, no one stopped them, and the stores were empty! Why? Here either all the products, including agricultural products, immediately went for nothing to the blacks in Africa, or they were put on the bases, and then systematically, declaring a lay commodity on documents, were cynically destroyed. Rather, both were happening. An artificial shortage was created in the country.
It is clear to blame the Soviet government for everything, and at the same time with it the socialist system. In parallel, this was also done in order to push the Soviet man in the street to come out in support of the future collapse of the USSR. Cunning, clever and mean.
Never to the author not to forget how one familiar KGB man in the winter 1986 of the year invited him to go with him for meat for dogs ... Kilometers for 30 from the city. When he and the other arrived at the scene, a terrible picture arose before their eyes: a ravine, piled with killed two-year-old gobies. When asked by the author, where so many bulls came from and why they were all slapped, his partner, sighing, answered that something terrible was happening in the country. Incomprehensible. And the bulls are all healthy, they were taken to a meat factory, but they turned out to be in a ravine. We saw off the back legs of one bull with a hand saw. And we went to the city. “From what I observe, the hair stands on end,” the KGB officer told me goodbye. “Someone at the top went crazy.”
This trip does not forget, she says a lot. It is clear that the security services in 90-ies did their work, struggling to destroy the country's economy, and the "democratic" media broadcast on radio and television screens that the Soviet economy could not withstand competition from the economic machine of the West. And the man in the street, not understanding what was actually happening, swallowed everything.
Deficit as a lever for managing society
From the foregoing it is clear that the crisis of the socialist economy was artificially organized. And his organization began immediately after the death of Joseph Vissarionovich. First, the right people were dragged to key places in the economy. Then, thanks to them, a clumsy, dull and sluggish economy was built. And then everything went on thumb groove. On the one hand, this freak was ruled by stupid Marxists from the Kremlin, on the other - smart and educated, but corrupt friends and friends from the special services.
And do not be hypocritical and lie that a socialist planned economy is a thousand times worse than a market one, capitalist. The question is who controls it. If you are honest patriots, then everything is good, the economy is developing at a pace that no Westerner has ever dreamed of. An example of this is the Stalin era.
Even the liberals agree with this, but they always have an excuse that, they say, the GULAG helped Stalin. In his time, slaves worked in the USSR.
Yes, the gulag camps kept themselves. This is true. But there was no substantial profit from society. Sometimes they were economically and not profitable. Especially in the initial period of their organization.
The prisoners needed housing, clothing, food. They had to contain. Free people took care of themselves, and here everyone had to deal with the state.
Nevertheless, the Soviet economy, with proper management, was developing at a tremendous pace. It collapsed and was deliberately inhibited, and this process was skillfully conducted from behind the cordon. The Union was not piled with war, now it was killed in other ways. Question: why all this was done?
On the one hand, it is clear: to prove to the whole world that a socialist economy is not viable. But there was another side of the coin: to create a continuous shortage in the country.
The lack of one, the other, the third - the most necessary and necessary - always causes irritation. Russian monotonously and tediously inspired that the all the fault of the allied republics. They cursed suck all the juice out of the RSFSR. Plus, and the countries of the Warsaw bloc. Which of all this can be a conclusion? Only one: down with those and others.
But in the union republics, the deficit is already controlled, it was not particularly spread there. When in Russia, the shops' counters, to say the least, looked empty, then in Central Asia, Kazakhstan, in the Baltic States and even in Ukraine, this was far from the case. There on the shelves you could find almost everything. Why was this done? Some may say that they do not grumble in the republics. But there is one more “but”. So that thousands of Russians began to look for a new homeland, where it is warmer, and everything is in stores.
It’s a paradox, but because of such an economic policy, a part of the population of the richest republic in the USSR surged to the periphery. To Central Asia and Kazakhstan, to Moldova and the Baltic States.
Why was this done? On the one hand, in order to create tension in the Union republics, they say, why are the Russians going? Here and without them closely. And in general, they are invaders and freeloaders. On the other hand, in order to move as much of the Russian ethnos as possible away from the Motherland.
The one who started it all knew the future well. He knew that the USSR should fall apart today or tomorrow, and millions of Russian people would turn out to be abroad. Of course, some of them will be able to return, but most of them, like the Kurds, being in a foreign land will turn into second-rate people and therefore oppressed by the social stratum. In fact, in white slaves.
Clever? Just brilliant! As a result, after the collapse of the USSR, the Russian ethnic group lost 25 to millions of its compatriots. The loss correlates with the result of the Second World War.