Military Review

What is the new adversary of Iskander and VKS capable of? “Iron Wolf” sharpens a tooth on the “Kaliningrad Enclave” and Belarus


In the current pre-escalation situation in the Eastern European and Baltic theaters of war, to the limit “hammered” by the units of the Ground Forces of the United States and NATO (including destructive and assault squadrons, as well as armored brigades), the operational-strategic militarization pattern, seen at the end, is clearly visible. s of the twentieth century. This is emphasized both by numerous military experts and historians, as well as by ordinary observers, commentators and bloggers in social networking communities and on well-known information and analytical resources. It is noteworthy that such analogies can be made not only regarding the chronological similarity of the list of actions of the German troops immediately before the start of World War II with the current preparation of the United NATO forces for escalation, but also for some pro-fascist organizations and groups that have not changed their names and continued further anti-Russian military activities, but not on the side of the Wehrmacht, but in favor of the North Atlantic alliance in the new century.

One of these units can be called the mechanized infantry brigade "Iron Wolf" ("Gelezinis Vilkas"), which is part of the Land Forces of Lithuania. It is well known that originally this name comes from the oldest monument of Lithuanian literature - “Gediminas Letters” mentioned in the poem “Pan Tadeusz” by Adam Mickiewicz, but this name also has a much more significant (second) root of origin - the Lithuanian fascist movement “Iron Wolf ”Created in 1927 by Augustinas Woldemaras, which during the Second World War was not the last power and sabotage and reconnaissance tool of the Wehrmacht in the Baltic theater of operations. Also a similar name to 1940-x. Wore 3 th Dragoon regiment of the Lithuanian army. The Iron Wolf Mechanized Infantry Brigade, formed in 1990, is a completely different military unit, equipped and trained to NATO standards. Structurally, the brigade consists of an 4 infantry battalion, an 1 artillery battalion, and a logistics battalion stationed in four districts of Lithuania.

As you know, today this unit takes an active part in supporting the punitive operation of the Ukrainian Armed Forces at the Donbass theater of operations. So, in April of this year, military instructors of the Prince Vaidotas logistics battalion of the Iron Wolf Group, went to the “Square” to train related Ukrainian formations about the important aspects of logistical support during the resumption of the active phase of the confrontation. Up to August, servicemen-descendants of the Hitler army used to train the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the Training Center of the peacekeeping forces at the Yavoriv training ground in the Lviv region. And this is not the whole list of Lithuanian aid for the Ukrainian junta in carrying out the genocide of the civilian population and the military personnel of the Donetsk and Lugansk people's republics. For example, in the period from 2015 to 2016, Vilnius transferred to Kiev more than 150 tons of retired 5,45-mm cartridges of various types for AK-74 modifications. Meanwhile, direct support for the inadequate and slave Poroshenko regime is not the main operational-tactical type of Lithuanian activity in the conditional conditional European theater of operations. Recently, the “Iron Wolf” brigade has become a key NATO unit in the Baltic ON, which is undergoing comprehensive training for the coming confrontation with the Russian Armed Forces at the borders of the Western Military District, as well as with the Belarussian Armed Forces.

A completely logical question arises: why is the Iron Wolf brigade positioned by the NATO command as a front line? After all, there is a volunteer unit “Zemessardze” (“Zemessardze”), which is part of the Latvian Armed Forces structure and is represented by 10 infantry, 1 artillery and 1 anti-aircraft battalions. The thing is that it is the south-western part of the Lithuanian-Polish border that forms the most critical and vulnerable NATO operational-strategic frontier, called the Suwalki corridor. In the event of a large-scale military conflict between Russia and the North Atlantic Alliance, this 100-kilometer sector of the Lithuanian-Polish border must be broken by the divisions of the Airborne Forces and the Ground Forces of Russia, as well as the Byelorussian military forces in the first place. Otherwise, we have all the chances to lose the Kaliningrad region extremely quickly. And you should not expect that the C-300PM1 and C-400 Triumph anti-aircraft brigades (concealed by Cristals-C1 and Torahs-M2) can save the situation, since the Polish Armed Forces are taking a number of serious steps to counter the defensive potential of the Kaliningrad enclave.

In particular, this is achieved by transferring to the southern border of the Kaliningrad region an impressive number of artillery units armed with modern barreled and rocket artillery. For example, 31 August 2017, the 11 th Mazury Artillery Regiment of the Polish Ground Forces received the Regina divisional fire set, represented by the 24 155-mm Krab self-propelled artillery. SAU "Crab" is a combined licensed modification of the British SAU AS-90 and the South Korean K9 "Thunder". The combat module (turret and 155-mm rifled gun L31) was borrowed from the British AS-90, and the chassis - from the South Korean K9. Consequently, the firing range of standard high-explosive and active-projectile projectiles (24700 and 30000, respectively) makes it easy to fire on border settlements in the southern part of Kaliningrad, and the use of M982 Block 1A2 “Excalibur” syntherophphrym –prosyphrophrophology –Cursyrchrophrophology –courthome –yearsyrophrophrophology Team EcNurXur ((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((ı ı (ı (ı X X (ı (ı (ı ı ı ı ı ı ı ı ı ı ı ı ı ı ı ı ı ı ı ı ı ı ı ı ı ı ı позволяет позволяет Следовательно Следовательно Следовательно Следовательно Следовательно km) will give the Polish gunners the opportunity to “reach out” to such cities as Volodino, Chernyakhovsk, Znamensk and Gusev. It is quite possible to intercept the latter with the help of the Pantyr-С45, but only in limited quantities, and, as you know, the 60-th Mazury artillery regiment also includes divisions of the 1-mm wheeled self-propelled artillery "Dana" and the MLRS "Grad".

SAU "Krab" Polish Army

Amid such endemic militarized approaches to Kaliningrad region maximum emphasis should be placed on the transfer of the enclave advanced precision shock complexes of long-range ATRA "Hermes" (in an amount 4 - 7 batteries with more than 96 - 168 multipurpose two-stage PTUR) capable of destroying tens active and temporarily “sleeping” firing positions of the enemy both at close and long distances. So far, we can only dream of a large-scale upgrade of our troops by the “Hermes”, all hope is only on the Iskander OTRK, which can simultaneously project the echeloned attack by the unobtrusive P500 (9М728) operational cruise missiles and the 9XNYXNYXNNXXNXXNNXX-NMHN tactical ballistic missiles to the enemy in an instant.

The formation of the “Suvalk corridor” will become a paramount task for the armed forces of Russia and Belarus, because control over this strategically important “isthmus” will make it possible: to limit the combat capabilities of the Lithuanian, Latvian and Estonian armies to the utmost; “Close in the boiler” all NATO mechanized units deployed in these states in recent years and operating on a rotational basis; as well as to ensure uninterrupted supplies to the Kaliningrad region of all the necessary weapons, fuel and lubricants, repair equipment, etc. for the successful defense of our western enclave. Meanwhile, to implement this scenario, our and the Belarusian Armed Forces will need to seriously "sweat", as the Baltic states are already rapidly turning into powerful fortifications stuffed with US, British, French, German and Spanish troops, which together with the mechanized brigade described above " Iron Wolf regularly work out numerous tactical interaction techniques in the Baltic sector of the European theater of war.

So, starting in June 2016 of the year, as part of the large-scale international maneuvers of NATO’s military operations in the Baltic sector of the European theater “Saber Strike-2016”, additional large-scale exercises “Iron Wolf-2016” were introduced, together with a group of thousands of units The US, Danish, Polish, German, French, and Luxembourg forces, simultaneously at the Sylvestras укаukauskas and Gaižiūnai test ranges, honed their skills in creating defensive lines from offensive actions of a conditional enemy equipped me network centric linking. The degree of importance of those teachings testify and list Attracted by the NATO military equipment of the participating countries, among which were: MBT «Leopard-2A4 / 5», M1A2, German large-ACS PzH 2000, attack aircraft A-10C and even strategic bombers-missile B -52H "Stratofortress". The following Iron Wolf 2017 exercise was held in June 2017 as part of the NATO 5,3-thousand contingent. And finally, the latest teachings called “Iron Wolf-2” are held from 18 to 31 in October of 2017, but with the participation of much smaller contingent. Their peculiarity is the development of network-centric interaction directly at the level of the commanders of the headquarters, as well as of individual units and military personnel. Remarkably, the organizer and leading element of these exercises is the command of the US Ground Forces Europe.

All these actions point to only one thing: for the defense of the Suvalki Corridor, the NATO Allied Command (including the US Air Force) is ready to use almost all types of non-nuclear tactical and strategic weapons. To inflict the maximum possible damage to the advancing "bones" of the NE of Russia and the Republic of Belarus, the NATO Allied Forces plan to combine the attacks of high-precision barreled and rocket artillery (self-propelled guns "Krab" and HIMARS) with the work of strategic, tactical and army aviation. The AH-64D Apache Longbow and F-16C / D Block 52+ helicopters of the Polish Air Force deployed in Latvia, which are actively armed with long-range tactical missiles JASSM-ER, will play a significant role here.

A very positive strategic moment for us is that the number of C-300PS and C-400 divisions deployed in the northwestern part of Belarus and the Kaliningrad region allows us to reduce to zero even the most massive missile and air attack of the Allied Air Forces of NATO; Numerous ground-based electronic warfare systems complete the picture, delivering jamming in the U-band decimeter to GPS satellite guidance modules installed on long-range cruise missiles, as well as to active radar homing heads in the X- / Ka-bands of centimeter / millimeter waves. At the same time, it is known that effectively suppressing “wandering” firing positions of mobile artillery weapons in the territory, for example, Lithuania, it will be necessary to have high-quality work of attack helicopters (Ka-52 and Mi-28Н) and strike tactical aviation (Su-30M and Su 34); This is where the safety issue of the above machines comes up during the hunt for "complex" ground targets.

The thing is that the air defense capabilities of the Lithuanian and Polish armed forces do not stand still. In particular, 26 of October 2017 of the year in Vilnius, between the Ministry of National Defense of Lithuania and the Norwegian company Norwgiab Kongsberg companies, was signed the 110 millionth contract for the purchase of two NASAMS 2 medium-range missile batteries to be adopted Lithuanian army to 2021 year (currently Lithuanian air defense / missile defense has extremely low capabilities both in the fight against aerodynamic targets and in the interception of tactical missiles and TFR, because only the Swedish portable air defense systems RBS-70 are in service, and Polish “Grom-2” air defense missile systems with a range of up to 7 and 5,5 km, respectively). These systems do not represent such a serious threat to the tactical aviation of the Russian Aerospace Forces, which cannot be said of NASAMS 2.

Developed in 1994, the NASAMS (Norwegian Advanced Surface-to-Air Missile System) air defense system is still quite advanced Western European short and medium-range air defense systems. Its main advantage was the use of AIM-120A air-to-air missiles adapted to launch from ground-to-surface launchers, equipped with an active radar homing head, which greatly improved the performance of the complex in repelling a massive enemy missile strike. In particular, when approaching a “fighter” target (with 3 xNUMX EPR) at a distance of 2 - 20 km ARGSN AIM-25C rocket “captures” it, it goes into the “let-forget” mode, while the operators placed at automated workplaces at the command and control center (PBU), they can quickly move on to direction finding and interception of a new “portion” of targets. Thus, even with a very limited target channel of the AN / TPQ-120 / AN / MPQ-64F64 multi-function radar on an 1 target, the number of simultaneously hit air targets can reach 3 - 8 and more (provided that only one MRLS is available); and all this thanks to the use of active radar homing.

The main "firing" elements of the NASAMS / -2 anti-aircraft missile system are an inclined launcher and a multifunctional radar centimeter range AN / TPQ-64. The latter is able to accompany the enemy's air objects on the 60 aisle and “capture” the 3 autotracking. Logically, the NASAMS 2 battery has the ability to simultaneously monitor 420 air targets with the actual “capture” of 24 objects. In practice, the use of missiles with ARGSN AIM-120C allows you to simultaneously fire several dozen targets for 5 - 15 second period. In the ammunition of the latest versions of the air defense missile system, guided melee air combat missiles of the AIM-9M / X “Sidewinder” family will also be introduced.

In the case, if one or several enemy aircraft succeeds in successfully applying dipole reflectors and disrupting the “capture” by the AMRAAM homing head, the correction and target designation radio channel can be used for the missile defense system on the trajectory. In this case, the complex’s combat work terminal will make an automatic request to the last known coordinates of the target via the radio communication link AN / TPQ-64 - RRDL-NII, and then adjust the AMRAAMa flight to “re-capture” the target. If enemy air attacks use electronic countermeasure complexes that impede the stable operation of the AN / TPQ-64 MRLS, a target self-propelled optical-electronic sighting system NTAS (“Norwegian Tracking Adjunct System”) operating in television and television can be used for targeting and “re-capturing” infrared channels of sight. At the same time, NTAS will be ineffective in difficult meteorological conditions (fog, snow, etc.). Consequently, to counteract the NASAMS-2 complexes, which entered service with the Lithuanian army, the active use of EW facilities (operating in the X-band from 8 to 10 GHz), combined with an unfavorable meteorological situation, is ideal.

It should be noted that the modernized version of the NASAMS 2 air defense system, which has significant differences from the early modification, will go into service with the Lithuanian Army. This concerns both the size of the battery and the technical capabilities of the new interceptor missiles. One battery of the advanced complex will be represented no longer by 3 platoons with 9x6 slanted launchers on the 54 AMRAAM anti-aircraft missiles, but 4 platoons with 12 similar launchers on the 72 of the AIM-120 family. The computational capabilities of a high-performance fire control system housed in a PBU allow the implementation of the highest rate of firing of the battery level in 5 SUR in 1 a second. With a massive enemy missile strike, all the ammunition can be used up in just 15 seconds. These abilities are also realized due to the active radar principle of targeting anti-aircraft missiles.

NASAMS 2 can also be ranked as the most advanced air defense / missile defense system of the ground forces, which is explained by the presence of a large number of multifunctional radar fire control systems: one battery contains up to 8 AN / MPQ-64 F2 “Sentinel 3D” (or AN / TPQ -64); This ensures excellent survivability of the complex in the event of an anti-radar strike from the enemy. There immediately recall domestic army air defense systems of medium-range "Buk-M1" and long-range C-300V "Antey", where each battery, besides the basic radar targeting / guidance 9S18M1 "Dome-M1" 9S32 and 9S19M2 "ginger" 6 radar has target illumination placed on self-propelled 9А310М1 (“Buk-М1”) self-propelled guns and 6 radars on masts placed on 4 PU 9А83 and 2 PU 9XXUMX PU (82300) on the masts (on the 300 and 30 PU and 6NNXX) This leads to the superiority of the latter over the C-1P / PM SAM system, where it is enough to destroy the RPN 9Н32Е to disable one division. Nevertheless, it is worth noting that disabling our radar Kupol-М1, Ginger and 300С2 systems Buk-МXNUMX and С-XNUMXВ will face difficulties in finding means of air attack of the enemy (reaction time will increase) after all, the guidance radars placed on the launcher are not intended for a quick and effective view of large sectors of aerospace. The radar "Sentinel" perfectly perform all the survey and fire functions. So the loss of two or three battery "Sentinel" will not deprive "NASAMS XNUMX" the ability to further intercept enemy targets.

The NASAMS 2 anti-aircraft missile system has a flexible and easily updated modular architecture for control and firing elements. In particular, if the first modification of the complex was equipped with AIM-120A guided missiles with a range of 20 - 25 km (during a ground launch, the range decreases 3 - 4 times due to the high troposphere density), then NASAMS 2 can be integrated more than modern options with increased range, for example, - AIM-120C-7, or AIM-120D, allowing to achieve a range of 40 - 55 km. To do this, it is enough to update the software of the PBU. In this performance, the combat potential of the Norwegian air defense missile system is significantly ahead of the capabilities of the Buk-М1 complex and roughly corresponds to the Buk-М1-2 version (in terms of the range and speed of the target being hit). In terms of fire performance, Buk-M1-2 continues to yield to the Norwegian product.

As for the maximum speed of the target, for the technological realities of the twenty-first century, this is rather the weak side of NASAMS 2. This indicator is 3600 km / h, which, against the background of the appearance of promising hypersonic elements of high-precision weapons, diving at a target with a speed in 4-4,5, is, to put it mildly, not enough. Moreover, NASAMS 2 will not be able to intercept even such an object as our X-XNUMHUSHK anti-radar missile, which, when launched from a short distance, has an approach speed in 58 - 3800 km / h. Another significant “Achilles' heel” of the Norwegian complex purchased by Lithuania is the lower boundary of the target destruction zone, which is as much as 4000 meters. In the conditions of the modern low-altitude area of ​​the theater of operations, where attack and reconnaissance UAVs, as well as tactical cruise missiles can bend around the terrain at altitudes from 30 to 15 m, this parameter can literally bury "NASAMS 25" on the battlefield (even the aging C-2PM300 ADMS is capable of shooting down enemy EFVs at an altitude of 1 meters).

The next two points in the list of deficiencies can be considered a small radio horizon (25 km), due to the low location of the AN / MPQ-64 F2 MRLS antenna post, as well as the low elevation scanning area from 0 - 55 °. The small radio horizon will not allow the NASAMS 2 battery to independently realize the full range potential of the latest AMRAAMO version (AIM-120C-7 / D); this will require over-the-horizon targeting from third-party sources of radar information (E-3C airborne aircraft, tactical fighters of NATO air forces, etc.). It is quite possible that this problem has already been solved by integrating the Giraffe AMB-3D surveillance radar complex into the Norwegian air defense system, the antenna post of which is located on the 17-meter mast installed above the kung with an operator cabin (a kind of lightweight version of our 40ВХNUMXМ tower for RPN 6H30E).
The second point will be much more difficult to correct: the low angle of elevation of the electron beam (55 degrees) of the AN / MPQ-64 F2 radars, in addition to the critically low detection height in 12000 m, does not only allow the complex to hit enemy aircraft on its own (without external target designation) at altitudes in 15 - 17 km, but also creates a "dead zone" funnel sector 70 degrees. Without overlapping with additional batteries of SAM and observation radars, the NASAMS 2 battery simply does not “see” WTO elements approaching from the depths of the stratosphere.

Attached to the NASAMS / -2 air defense system a dual-band optical-electronic sighting system NTAS

Vilnius prepared a "surprise" and another feature of "NASAMS 2" concerning the speed of deployment in theaters. Despite the placement of Sentinel multifunctional radars and PBUs on a trailed wheel chassis and a truck, respectively, platforms with inclined modular launchers for AMRAAM missiles are not intended for firing from a traveling position and are usually removed from off-road trucks Sisu E13TP, but then installed on hydraulically lifted supports in the ground.

This procedure takes nearly 15 minutes. And, as you know, in the area of ​​high-intensity military conflict, every minute can be decisive (our “Three Hundreds” are brought into a combat position in 5 minutes). As you can see, the characteristics of the NASAMS 2 air defense system acquired by the Lithuanian Ministry of National Defense are extremely contrasted, and finding a worthy “scrap” for the Air and Space Forces of Russia, if necessary, is not difficult, but there are some of its aspects that, under certain circumstances, can lead to a lot of trouble, because the complex can act in a passive mode with the disconnected radar means by external data and data of the OLS NTAS. The operators of reconnaissance drones and aircraft of electronic and optical reconnaissance Tu-214Р will have to deal here.

Information sources:
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Sergey-svs
    Sergey-svs 30 October 2017 07: 11 New
    ... One of such units can be safely called the mechanized infantry brigade "Iron Wolf" ("Gelezinis Vilkas"), which is part of the Lithuanian Ground Forces ...

    No need to scare us with all sorts of Lithuanian crap, some have already tried! negative And in what place of the female organ, is now their vaunted Dead Head Division (SS-Panzer-Division "Totenkopf") ?! We’ll send the Iron Wolf there too. yes
    1. kg pv
      kg pv 30 October 2017 07: 40 New
      It’s more like the article is not about some wolves. wassat but about the SAMAMS 2 SAM, it’s just for some reason with a “long-range approach” laughing
      1. Grandfather
        Grandfather 30 October 2017 10: 06 New
        phew .... read-nasilil ... strongbnokufaf ... but seriously ... what nafig Spratia ... what are you talking about? about the extra movement of the little finger of the Commander of the Russian Armed Forces, whoever? The story is in your hands ... but what for? not yet forgotten, in the class of radio engineering (sinful, "arctur" is a favorite) and in the garage "VEF" I love it ... I welcome you even. you are ours! Well, come to your senses! we loved you so much, for the “west” fucking, for not our accent, for landscapes, for the dimension of being, but you were Ours! and Invar, and Lyme, and Valdis, and his mother Pelsh! Well, we loved you ... what else do you want? yes you ... I will go .. I will write .......
        1. Kent0001
          Kent0001 30 October 2017 18: 47 New
          Damn, the same garbage. Articles of this kind simply explode the brain. I think that only nuclear weapons in response to provocations against our territories, and no less. Hardcore pshekam and others who do not understand, only hardcore.
    2. Megatron
      Megatron 30 October 2017 09: 58 New
      I think it makes no sense to try to build parity with NATO on conventional weapons.
      If a conflict starts, start immediately with tactical nuclear weapons, and then according to the situation ....
      1. Mikhail Zubkov
        Mikhail Zubkov 30 October 2017 14: 50 New
        Mine the border with the Poles by nuclear mines, and so that they (mines) with inertial autonomous guidance would rocket jump to the Poles for 30-40 km and explode at the right height at the right points. Including Elblag. We will never plow these land-marshes anyway - we will only pick up the ports of Danzig. And we will still plow Lithuania - after the next major denazification. Therefore, there only the lithnatsiks will need to be shot - this will have to be a regular art, but now it's time to bring and deploy it, with a caliber of at least 152 mm, including the entire "flower series". We must work already according to the laws and states of wartime!
    3. 73bor
      73bor 30 October 2017 14: 23 New
      The author forgot a little another means of destruction, these are MLRS systems "Smerch", "Hurricane", "Tornado", which work well on identified artillery systems! And about the ability to conduct hostilities, we perfectly see how the coalition "fought" with ISIS, it feels like they don’t know anything, and that’s with a gang even if well armed but a gang!
  2. aszzz888
    aszzz888 30 October 2017 07: 26 New
    As you know, today this unit takes an active part in supporting the punitive operation of the Armed Forces in the Donbass theater of operations.

    ... fascists - they are everywhere fascists ... and the way to get rid of them is destruction ... angry
    1. Alikos
      Alikos 30 October 2017 11: 36 New
      Quote: aszzz888
      As you know, today this unit takes an active part in supporting the punitive operation of the Armed Forces in the Donbass theater of operations.

      ... fascists - they are everywhere fascists ... and the way to get rid of them is destruction ... angry

      Apparently, not enough of them were once evicted to Northern Kazakhstan, to the North ...
      So many of them have now bred
  3. Mar.Tirah
    Mar.Tirah 30 October 2017 07: 34 New
    Quote: Sergey-svs
    ... One of such units can be safely called the mechanized infantry brigade "Iron Wolf" ("Gelezinis Vilkas"), which is part of the Lithuanian Ground Forces ...

    No need to scare us with all sorts of Lithuanian crap, some have already tried! negative And in what place of the female organ, is now their vaunted Dead Head Division (SS-Panzer-Division "Totenkopf") ?! We’ll send the Iron Wolf there too. yes

    And the population of the Baltic states and other former VD countries, for sure. Is also scared, only by the Russian military threat. The Information War, as one of the tools of politics.
    1. Lelek
      Lelek 30 October 2017 13: 44 New
      Quote: Mar. Tira
      And the population of the Baltic states, and other former countries of the VD, is exactly the same scare, only the Russian military threat.

      Why the hell did they surrender to us? You just need not to pay attention to their squealing, that's all.

      And for each muck on their part, it is hard to punish.
  4. Same lech
    Same lech 30 October 2017 07: 35 New
    already now the Baltic states are rapidly turning into powerful fortified areas, stuffed with the US, British, French, German and Spanish, which, together with the Iron Wolf mechanized brigade described above, regularly practice numerous tactical tactics in the Baltic area of ​​the European theater of operations.
    Quite recently, someone from the members of the forum tried to convince me that the NATO parts that appeared there did not represent a danger to RUSSIA ... now we see that the configuration of the WEST troops gradually turns into a shock wedge aimed at RUSSIA ... the military threat to security for our country from this direction is growing .

    It’s quite obvious to me that the Iron Infantry Brigade in the battles with our troops will be quickly defeated ... but this is not the main thing in 2 MB Balts most often served as punitive in the occupied territories
    and once on the territory of RUSSIA, they immediately begin massacres of the Russian population ... that's what can happen.
    1. Antianglosax
      Antianglosax 30 October 2017 08: 02 New
      Quote: The same Lech
      the Iron Infantry Brigade in battles with our troops will be quickly defeated.

      I would say it will be burned instantly and remotely along with all the infrastructure of the sprotostan that could harm us. In the event of a collision with Kaliningrad there will be a full-fledged nuclear world war in which the geyrops have no chance to survive.
    2. Grandfather
      Grandfather 30 October 2017 10: 28 New
      Most recently, some of the members of the forum tried to convince me that the parts of NATO that appeared there were not dangerous for RUSSIA ... now we see
      oh Lyoha on the need .... one wave of the sleeve ... kidding ... 5ooo .50000. Do you think Iskander can count?
  5. Disorder
    Disorder 30 October 2017 08: 57 New
    "Meat". They will equip the natives with old weapons and "a flag in their hands, a drum on the neck .........".
    1. Grandfather
      Grandfather 30 October 2017 10: 35 New
      Quote: Trouble
      "Meat". They will equip the natives with old weapons and "a flag in their hands, a drum on the neck .........".

      "natives" are only cockroaches .... their fate is not enviable. since individuals surviving a nuclear catastrophe are doomed to extinction, in short, they will die within the next 1-2 years. everything .. the report is finished. I'm dying ... and the Old Professor, still Piss, is wandering in time ... Help! (Christopher Lloyd) Michael, are you sitting ??? ubbbbbyyuyuyuysssssuuuukaa ... (gag ..... baths ..
      1. Grandfather
        Grandfather 30 October 2017 10: 55 New
        weird ten with li
        shnim minutes. silent Vadim ... the day "drove" noted to know something ... well, cho ... man, respect is necessary. the hammer ... am proto does not speak because it is cool) thinks) how selectively strange the text goes ...
  6. svp67
    svp67 30 October 2017 09: 53 New
    Since NATO is waiting for us in the Suvalkovsky corridor, we need to turn it into the Suvalkovsky Cauldron for them and let them "boil in hellfire" there until we get bored ...
  7. Oleg Tolstoy
    Oleg Tolstoy 30 October 2017 10: 07 New
    Well, let’s go again to the “Pursuit of Grunwald”, only this time through the Suvalkovsky corridor. Well, history doesn’t teach anything to goofies! laughing
  8. Wolka
    Wolka 30 October 2017 10: 42 New
    the time factor (the human factor) will be decisive here, and who will service these plants, the Lithuanians, they still need to be taught and taught, Norwegians, and there are also not many of them, they themselves are scarce on their native land ...
  9. free
    free 30 October 2017 10: 47 New
    Do what you must and be what happens!
  10. nikvic46
    nikvic46 30 October 2017 11: 06 New
    In general, data on foreign weapons under the Soviet Union was published in a special journal with the stamp "Only
    for officers. "And it is up to the Armed Forces Command to decide where and where to direct their weapons. If ISIS was hollowed out with missiles from the Caspian, then why not use the Sevastopol flotilla to protect our territory. In Russia, freedom
    the words. But it is better to return to the fact that each strategic object is covered by the same trusted correspondent.
    Trust but verify. In 1941, during a Nazi air raid on Sevastopol, dozens of spies highlighted the direction of the Germans where the Germans would drop bombs. When these reptiles were discovered, they were immediately shot. This was told to me by an eyewitness who was a teenager at that time.
    1. Sasha71
      Sasha71 1 November 2017 02: 41 New
      In the 80s he lived in a military town in Kaunas, Lithuania, and any officer could write out “Foreign Military Review”, for sure. The magazine was excellent. Even in my school, they lay in bundles: the school was for officers' children and magazines were turned into waste paper, and the most interesting ones (like ZVO) we liked reading - any new Western weapons: TTX, cost, who is armed, quantity. We were in the know. :)
  11. Nitochkin
    Nitochkin 30 October 2017 11: 37 New
    What, what is written on their emblem, Iron Vilkas !? Kapets, but why not Iron Spoon?
    1. Igorec
      Igorec 1 November 2017 08: 34 New
      Lozhkas too brutal probably
  12. monah2987
    monah2987 30 October 2017 11: 42 New
    Wolves run from the smell of gunpowder, they are capable of tearing a lone calf !!! "The star of captivating happiness will rise," the poet predicted, the colonial policy is doomed - the wolves will not have enough to protect it, the shepherds also become smarter than respect, they want and not the whims of the elite to fulfill !!! Being a respected, worthy person is more prestigious than living under pain of death from the avenger !!! V.O.V. lesson for the future !!!
  13. ariman1
    ariman1 30 October 2017 11: 52 New
    I somehow don’t understand the author - he himself writes that the nature of NATO events in the Baltic states is defensive. The exercises are held according to the legend of the defense of Suwalki. So, does the author deny the right to self-defense of the UN member countries? Like, should you give up right away?
    By the way, in case of war, Poland needs to very quickly capture the Kaliningrad region, maybe use the airborne units to neutralize the Iskander. In general, I think that they will not have time to break through the Suvalka corridor if NATO responds quickly. And the Baltic states have more anti-tank weapons. In terms of air defense, the Patriots and TAADs in Poland can help cover the Baltic states. In turn, a massive missile strike against air defense systems of the 58th air defense army
    1. av58
      av58 30 October 2017 12: 51 New
      Suppose NATO captured the Kaliningrad region, what's next, the end of the war?
      No, it will be a kind of gambit. Further unlimited use of force and weapons, including on enemy civilian targets, and a campaign against London. No surrender, until the complete extermination of the enemy.
      1. Oleg Petrov
        Oleg Petrov 30 October 2017 17: 12 New
        Kneading will begin with the concentration of forces and means at the borders and the ships entering the launch zone of cruise missiles - well, do not repeat the 41st year!
      2. ariman1
        ariman1 30 October 2017 21: 42 New
        Well, so NATO will use nuclear weapons. By the way, the big question is who is the first one who has stronger eggs or more madness (depending on which side to look at)
  14. Berkut24
    Berkut24 30 October 2017 12: 24 New
    Why these attempts to describe the attack on the Kaliningrad enclave as a local conflict? As if, if they attacked Smolensk, then we would have to count the number of tanks and air defense systems in those parts. The shelling of our territory is a global batch where everything will be demolished, and not just the forest in the notorious "Suvalka forest and swamp swamps." Poland with the US armored division may enter Kaliningrad, but they will have nowhere to return. And nobody will save the architecture of ancient Polish cities. As well as the City of London or Manhattan.
  15. av58
    av58 30 October 2017 12: 48 New
    Tired of these clicks. Let NATO draw at least all its forces to the Kaliningrad region, who is interested or scared? An attack on the Kaliningrad region does not pose a direct threat to the main territory of Russia: the Baltic Limitrophs themselves are a natural barrier to NATO. At the same time, an attack on the Kaliningrad region means a global war. Can NATO defeat the Kaliningrad group and the Baltic Fleet base? Theoretically, but then what? Someone will say in their right mind and firm memory that this will all end? No, the answer will be to the destruction of both the Baltic states and the whole of Europe.
    There is one more question: why is it so scrupulous to count the number of NATO artillery batteries, air defense systems, tanks, planes, and other means deployed in Poland or Lithuania? The answer should be made not only on the military, but also on areas with the complete destruction of enemy territory, including civilian infrastructure and housing. For the West, the most effective means of influence is intimidation, and it should be applied without hesitation and without limit.
    1. Podjog saraev
      Podjog saraev 30 October 2017 19: 48 New
      Attack civilians? Create intimidation? And then you are ready to receive the eyes of your children in a glass in the form of an answer on the other side for "the complete destruction of enemy territory, including civilian infrastructure and housing"? Or there to endure medieval torture such as skinning. I'm not ready. Where do you come from, or undergrowth, or vice versa dinosaurs of the Cold War that way from the 50 / 60s
  16. av58
    av58 30 October 2017 13: 01 New
    Leaving aside the interesting topic of the "iron wolf", I will raise another: who will be the main force in a possible conflict.
    The air force, air defense, tanks and artillery are all right, but motorized rifles will be the basis, and it is they that need to be strengthened now in the first place.
    It is necessary not only to increase the mobility of the infantry, but also to increase their firepower.
    To do this, I would suggest a sharp increase in the production of hand-held flamethrowers of the "bumblebee" type, and transfer them to each m / s compartment. It would have been possible to introduce at least a couple of flamethrowers into the state. In addition, each unit soldier - RPG, at least type "Flies."
    1. Xscorpion
      Xscorpion 30 October 2017 17: 53 New
      Quote: av58
      Leaving aside the interesting topic of the "iron wolf", I will raise another: who will be the main force in a possible conflict.
      The air force, air defense, tanks and artillery are all right, but motorized rifles will be the basis, and it is they that need to be strengthened now in the first place.
      It is necessary not only to increase the mobility of the infantry, but also to increase their firepower.
      To do this, I would suggest a sharp increase in the production of hand-held flamethrowers of the "bumblebee" type, and transfer them to each m / s compartment. It would have been possible to introduce at least a couple of flamethrowers into the state. In addition, each unit soldier - RPG, at least type "Flies."

      Not aware that the state of the MCO RPG-7 is available, as well as BMPs or armored personnel carriers? Or did not serve? How will they be helped by the RPG-18 "MUHA" disposable grenade launcher, which is already absent in the troops. In such a conflict, infantry will only be needed for defense / assault on cities, the rest will be done by aviation, artillery and missiles.
  17. Anchonsha
    Anchonsha 30 October 2017 13: 15 New
    No need to consider the Merikans completely idiots. Their task now is to intimidate the EU and the peoples of Europe with Russian aggression and force them to replenish NATO with 2% of their GDP and tie Europe further to US obedience.
  18. boriz
    boriz 30 October 2017 13: 30 New
    If memory serves us, a preventive nuclear strike is laid in our military doctrine. That is, if someone is the first to attack us using conventional weapons, then we will use nuclear weapons in response. Just based on the fact that the military budget is 10 times larger and cruise missiles are unmeasured.
    And in case of aggravation of the situation, it will be enough to recall this. With tactical nuclear weapons (for Europe), everything is fine with us, for the United States too. No one will climb.
  19. Krasnyiy komissar
    Krasnyiy komissar 30 October 2017 15: 14 New
    The attack on Kaliningrad should end with a salvo launch of our SSBNs on NATO infrastructure in Eastern Europe. 10 minutes of missile combat - and there is no Warsaw, Belin, Vilnius, and even a bunch of cities. 64 thermonuclear munitions are carried by one submarine of the Dolphin project, and we have not one of them. The scale of the polar chanterelle is hard to imagine, but the inhabitants of Hiroshima of sample 45 will seem lucky.
  20. Oleg Petrov
    Oleg Petrov 30 October 2017 17: 06 New
    It is enough to take their vital objects (nuclear power plants — for example) into the sight with missiles with non-nuclear warheads, and to throw invading troops with nuclear neutron charges — not a single European state in this situation will climb.
    And it will be cheaper than trying again with our economy, but theirs in the field of conventional weapons
  21. The comment was deleted.
  22. Xscorpion
    Xscorpion 30 October 2017 17: 58 New
    Quote: boriz
    If memory serves us, a preventive nuclear strike is laid in our military doctrine. That is, if someone is the first to attack us using conventional weapons, then we will use nuclear weapons in response. Just based on the fact that the military budget is 10 times larger and cruise missiles are unmeasured.
    And in case of aggravation of the situation, it will be enough to recall this. With tactical nuclear weapons (for Europe), everything is fine with us, for the United States too. No one will climb.

    This is true. No one will climb. You are afraid to touch the missiles with its incomprehensible number of warheads and the unknown range of missiles .. and then the crazed NATO troops will rush to a nuclear superpower, with thousands of warheads capable of cleansing the entire planet from humanity in half an hour. There are no such suicides in the NATO leadership .
  23. Xscorpion
    Xscorpion 30 October 2017 18: 06 New
    But in the general article, it’s a minus. It’s just gathering a bunch of hysterical news from the West and an unsuccessful attempt to analyze them. Why is there a massive launch of Iskanders on the enemy’s troops, which will help us .. Iskanders in Kaliningrad are located to destroy the enemy’s missile defense and air defense. troops, it’s only with YaBCh. And the Suval corridor exists only in the sore brain of Western journalists. If Russia helps Kaliningrad, it won’t even have to leave its territory. Caliber will hit far, and dozens of Tu-22,95,160 will be able to release hundreds Aketi, only to take off from their airports.
  24. ul_vitalii
    ul_vitalii 30 October 2017 19: 04 New
    It was smooth on paper, but they forgot about the ravines, they don’t have the spirit to fight, it’s hard for them to unite this entire international combined rabble into one whole, everything will be transient, even if they do not rely on positional battles.
  25. Doctor Evil
    Doctor Evil 30 October 2017 19: 49 New
    I’m very interested in what kind of city is this Volodino?
  26. wax
    wax 30 October 2017 22: 44 New
    If there is a conflict, then you can not rush to the Suvalki corridor, but strike frontally through Vilnius to Kaunas, as well as from land and from the sea to Riga, cutting the entire Baltic into two parts, well, from Grodno to Szczecin, and from the sea to Gdansk. A serious army will not rest on a 100-kilometer stretch for a breakthrough, while the entire corridor will be shot through from two sides, turning it into a corridor of death. Therefore, there they instruct the Lithuanian "wolves" to die.
    1. kuz363
      kuz363 2 November 2017 07: 20 New
      Hit all the Baltic capitals! They themselves will ask for peace.
  27. Bat
    Bat 30 October 2017 23: 21 New
    And where are we going to bury them all?
  28. Boris Chernikov
    Boris Chernikov 30 October 2017 23: 43 New
    What is the conversation about? The fire contact scheme has long been worked out: advanced units, upon detection of the enemy, transmit their artillery coordinates, which strikes.
  29. Black sniper
    Black sniper 31 October 2017 13: 22 New
    An interesting article about NATO dying in the Suval corridor ...
  30. Charik
    Charik 1 November 2017 16: 38 New
    but is there something to cover them with at one moment?
  31. kuz363
    kuz363 2 November 2017 07: 18 New
    The author thinks in terms of the Second World War, which is taught in the Academies apparently still. Bring spare parts for the repair of equipment, fuel and other crap, but there will be nothing of this with the superiority of NATO aircraft in 20-30 times! Similarly, there is superiority in land and sea forces in the Baltic. And all these air defense systems of Russia with their vaunted characteristics will live a maximum of a day or two in the mass attack of airplanes and helicopters. Only the use of tactical nuclear weapons can stop a conflict.