Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Air Force Alexander Zelin spoke about the development of national military aviation.

99

"Independent Military Review" continues to summarize the intermediate results of the reform of the Armed Forces, which is in our army and navy in the last three years. The main questions that we ask our interlocutors are what has changed during this time in the troops subordinate to them, what unresolved problems have remained, what needs to be done to implement the plan.

Honored military pilot, commander-in-chief of the Air Force, Colonel-General Alexander ZELIN answers the questions of the NVO editor-in-chief.

FIRST BUSINESS FLIGHTS

“I want to start our conversation, Alexander Nikolayevich, with a message that arrived on informational tapes on the eve of our meeting.” It is about the fact that the Minister of Defense of Russia Anatoly Serdyukov signed with the director general of the Sukhoi company Igor Ozar a contract for the supply to the Air Force by 2020 of 92 Su-34 front-line bombers. What other planes and helicopters and in what quantities will go into service with our aviation until the twentieth year?

- I will not call the number, but it is up to hundreds.

- Up to hundreds of each species?

- Yes, according to Su-34, the figure has already been voiced - this is 92 machines. But in total, the Air Force will include 124 of such aircraft, and later on 140 machines. In principle, if we talk about the Su-34, we received the presidential face of this aircraft, but at the same time we continue to increase the combat capabilities of this bomber. What is it? We put a powerful onboard complex of self-defense, we develop a new weapon, with new, enhanced combat capabilities. Mainly, air – surface, air – radar, air – ship, and we plan that it will become the carrier of other long-range missiles. Such work is underway, and I believe that this is the platform that is able to solve this problem - that is, to increase the forces of nuclear deterrence as part of the strategic aviation of the Air Force.

Despite the fact that the supply contract was concluded, I signed the technical specifications for this contract, where I indicated the possibility to carry out further modernization to increase the combat capabilities of this flying complex.

- By its effectiveness?

- According to its effectiveness and combat capabilities in a single system of warfare, which the General Staff is currently building, connected with the issue of the fashionable concept of network-centric control systems. So that in this control loop with already installed communications and automated control systems, we have solved this problem.

I recently arrived from St. Petersburg, where a meeting of the interdepartmental commission for the creation of the A-100 aircraft was held under my leadership. This is a continuation of the A-50 topic and more. There will be a machine with such combat capabilities, which will create an opportunity not only to control the crews in the air, but also to target all radio-contrast and other targets on the ground, but also to control the unmanned aircraft from this aircraft.

Such a massive planning. With tasks for 30-s. As for other purchases that are expected to receive the Air Force. This is a Su-35 aircraft ...

- The contract on it, as I remember, was signed on MAX on 48 machines.

- Yes, for such a quantity, but we will still purchase. Somewhere up to a hundred units. I consider this plane in conjunction with the Su-30SM aircraft. We are not buying and are not planning to buy, let it not seem unexpected to you, combat training aircraft. We buy combat aircraft with the ability of the machine to conduct training for flight personnel. Requirements for combat training aircraft include a number of tasks that the pilot works in the air. For example, the system of failures, other problems ...

But now the cabin of the aircraft has changed so much that we can work all these actions on the ground. On simulators. Since several multi-functional indicators can replace each other. And to talk about the refusal of some devices and to train the pilot to do without them in the air - this task itself goes away. We will work it out on complex procedural simulators on the ground. Understanding that a pilot must be taught to fly with failed instruments, but for this purpose we will not create an airplane and do this in the air. This is not economically feasible, since we have many interchangeable multi-functional indicators. One refused, you can go to the other and get all the necessary information.

Of course, several multifunctional indicators may fail if the plane is de-energized, but this requires a completely different action from the pilot for piloting.

- If I understand you correctly, you will not buy the Yak-130?

- No, the Yak-130 is an advanced training aircraft designed for training cadets. This is a training and combat machine, which will allow, having completed the training of a cadet in a school, in a combat unit, to transfer him immediately to a combat aircraft. Because the cabin of the Yak-130 is identified with a combat aircraft. There are also multi-functional indicators. In fact, the cab of the Yak-130, MiG-29 and Su-27, they are similar. And the combat capabilities of this aircraft are also very decent. This is a modern highly maneuverable aircraft with weapons, which the cadets in the fifth year, at the final stage of their training, especially in operational-tactical aviation, will use. We really will teach them that.

It is even planned to create training centers where young lieutenants will undergo retraining. And on the basis of the Yak-130 there is an idea to create a light strike aircraft, which later, in order to increase the class qualification from the third class to the second, will be located in the Lipetsk training center. And with his help, we will solve this problem. At least, we are currently working on this option with the Deputy Head of the State Center, in order to prepare pilots for flights on Su-34 and Su-35 aircraft.

And in order to accomplish tasks with highly mobile Su-35 aircraft, later with T-50, we plan to purchase Su-30CM aircraft. This aircraft is the same highly maneuverable, two-cabin, but combat, capable of performing any combat tasks, but in a two-man crew.

Why is that? Because we have a flight manning ratio of one and a half. And in order to give everyone the opportunity to fly with the current full-size, the two-cabin machine allows you to carry out combat flights throughout the flight. Train and those and others. Thus, everyone will be constantly in the training, and we will follow the instructions of the Chief of the General Staff so that the raid we have more than 130 hours. This is a very real task. When changing the fleet in tactical aviation, we will solve this problem easily, having two-cabin cars in combat form.

- I wanted to ask you about the storms, but I will do it a little later. While I would like to know from you what will happen to other planes? For example, with the MiG-31.

- MiG-31 is a wonderful aircraft. He has a great future. We are now determined. According to the list, we have about 300 such aircraft, more precisely, 252 as part of the Air Force. We plan to have such planes in service with up to 100. We decided on its modernization for the new tasks in the MiG-31BM variant. We decided that we are upgrading the MiG-31BS, and we have, in addition to the MiG-31B, the DZ series and the BS series. We decided that the BS series will remain without refueling in the air, DZ - with refueling and B - also with refueling in the air. At the same time, the DZ series will perform its special tasks. And in our roster will be up to 100 aircraft. With the new armament long-range air-to-air missile, in essence, realize the combat capabilities of the onboard complex, then the combination of the old and modern weapons and the new navigation system.

Today we are moving the whole aviation to another range. From decimeter move to meter. All our near navigation will go to this range. This is connected, first of all, with the decision of the government on the transition of all television to digital communications. And we in this case leave the decimeter range. But in this case we will begin to implement the possibility of landing on any civilian airfield. And with 2014, this opportunity will be enshrined in law. Now it is not from the budget, but funds are allocated for air navigation services. And with 14 year, we will be exempt from paying for the airfield service - for parking and airport services.

We will be able to safely fly throughout the territory of the Russian Federation, using the entire aerodrome network, both military and civil aviation. And the MiG-31 is one of the first aircraft to receive such an opportunity. He has to fly in high latitudes. This is an aircraft that is practically intended for autonomous operations outside the radar field - it has such opportunities. Therefore, he must use any aerodrome he needs. As for the Arctic Circle, and in the south of the country. In Kamchatka, Chukotka, in the Far East - wherever it is needed.

The ACS system on it is quite advanced, it allows the aircraft to land at the border of 50 meters of cloudiness and visibility of the order of 800 meters. The equipment of the aircraft allows all this, the equipment of the aerodrome as well. And he will solve all his tasks very well.

- We talked about Su-34. But in theory, he should replace the Su-24 bomber in perspective.

- Not in theory, but he really goes to replace him.

- And what will be the fate of the Su-24, until all the Su-34 come?

- We have upgraded the Su-24. And we already have two squadrons of new upgraded versions of this machine. This is the OCD "Gusar" - we have 24 units in the Far East. And directly in the European part and in the Urals, in Shugol, there is a direct modernization of the Metronom OKRu. It is conducted by the company of the famous Alexander Nikolaevich Panin.

We can say that the results that we obtained on this machine, we are completely satisfied. And we will be engaged in the modernization and reduction of simple Su-24, which we still have in service. Naturally, they serve their life cycle, this is an excellent aircraft soldier who solved his tasks. And we will deliver high-series aircraft to the troops. For the time being, by 2020 we will not fully switch to Su-34 airplanes, which we will have in our lineup more than 120.

In fact, we have four commanders, the state center - five main base points, where we will create flying groups of X-NUMX – 24 – 28 Su-30 airplanes. The Far East is Khurba, it is Chelyabinsk, it is Krymsk and Voronezh and Lipetsk.

- I remember how we stood next to Farnborough and watched the F-22 fly. At that time you didn’t very much approve of him, noting that he doesn’t hold out to those promotional materials, which signed his unsurpassed merits.

“I told you wrong then.” I said, “You see, I smile. I am very pleased that he flies like this. ” We then stood next to Poghosyan Mikhail Aslanovich, therefore, apparently, we were not shown all the opportunities this machine possesses, but Pogosyan and I realized that our partners are also trying to move on to the highly maneuverable parameters that we have. They denied this fact for a very long time, apparently because there were some technical problems with the solution of this problem. And second, we fly no worse than they fly. You are convinced of this more than once at MAKS. Both in 2009 and in 2011, when they demonstrated MiG-29 with OBT, Su-35 ...

I then told Vladimir Vladimirovich (Putin. - V.L.) that we did not even find a name for the maneuvers that our plane performs.

- I remembered the F-22 in connection with the T-50. Should he be better than an American fighter?

- I have already told someone from foreign correspondents: to determine whether it is better or worse, you need to look at how the car behaves in the air. At one time we were told that the F-15 is an unsurpassed aircraft. When I studied at our Gagarin Academy, we were told that it was just a “super-airplane”. And when fate allowed me to fly on the last modification of this F-15, we flew in Ramstein with General Kharchevsky - he was on the same machine, I - on the other, I realized that even at MiG-23MA you could easily fight with this plane. Calmly

Everything is relative. Here our proverb works: “It’s better to see once than to hear a thousand times”.

“But the T-50 is already flying.” Three cars, if I'm not mistaken, pass the test.

- T-50 flies. The flight characteristics are flown around, we are going over to the test of the onboard complex, a vehicle is being built that will go into combat use. All within. I constantly say this. There are technical problems. It is clear that when creating such a machine, everything goes smoothly. But I am the chief designer Alexander Nikolayevich (Davydenko. - V.L.) satisfied. When I am in Komsomolsk-on-Amur, I never pass a workshop where a fighter is assembled. The topic is closed and everything else, but we regularly discuss the progress of work on the aircraft with the director, a respected Alexander Ivanovich (Pekarsh. - VL). So far there are no fundamental questions.

- That is, everything is on schedule.

- Yes, that recently Vladimir Vladimirovich was there (Putin. - V.L.), we all showed him, he asked many questions. And when we begin to engage in the use of T-50 for its intended purpose, and it is intended to gain air supremacy, this is one of its main tasks - to conquer the area of ​​hostilities, air supremacy (in HPV we have somewhere before 60 such machines) I believe that only first-class pilots will fly these planes.

We understand that this will be a special plane, we know where it will be deployed, for what tasks. And there will fly already, we will say, high-class professionals. This will be an elite unit that will perform the most demanding and challenging tasks and which will be able to perform them. Speech about young pilots is not here. I do not even set myself such a task.

WTA DEVELOPMENT PLANS

- Our conversation is very interesting, informative. But you have not said a word about military transport aircraft, about helicopters. What plans await us here?

- There are plans to create a promising long-range aviation complex. We returned to this issue.

- Vladimir Putin spoke about this in his article.

- Yes. Somewhere in the 30s, we should have in the Air Force a new aircraft with combat capabilities that will adequately allow him to play one of the main roles in the nuclear deterrent forces of the Air Force in the triad of the Strategic Nuclear Forces of all Armed Forces.

As for military transport aviation. Here I can not rejoice over the decisions that have been made. Here and the restoration of the An-124-100 production in the An-124-300 version, and in large strides in accordance with the capabilities of the plant, the production of the An-124-100 is underway.

- No, it's all in Ulyanovsk. Further, the IL-76MD-90А production line was deployed there. Everything, we left Tashkent, we ourselves created this project in digital form, and in July, I think, this car will fly.

We are buying a sufficiently large number of such machines, and it will be our main carrier for special tasks, which I mentioned earlier. The same, for example, refuellers will fly on this machine, which will allow the D-90 engine to perform refueling tasks without changing the flight altitude. Now, for objective reasons, we need to go down lower for such an operation. Because of the engine. And with the new economy, these tasks we will be easier to solve.

Farther. I am the chairman of the commission for the completion of the creation of the An-70. I was in Kiev, we removed all the contradictions that were there. Ukrainians collect the car that they have, and also in June – July they must present it to us, and we must fly. Apparently, we will carry out all the finishing work on the territory of Ukraine in order to promptly eliminate all the shortcomings that, naturally, will be at this stage. And later, on the territory of Ukraine and on the territory of Russia, we will complete OCDs on this aircraft.

- And will it be collected in Omsk?

- While preliminary in Voronezh. Antonovtsy actively interact with this plant on the An-148 aircraft, there are other projects on the An-158, An-178 - there are established connections, engineering, technical, organizational and technical, purely organizational, there is mutual understanding. In addition, Voronezh is not so far from Kiev. And from Kharkov as well. And I think that a short distance will allow them to quickly resolve all issues.

Now about light military transport aircraft. We have so far stopped on the An-140-100 variant. And we do not present such a military task of transporting equipment to it. This aircraft will be designed, first of all, for the transportation of personnel and small cargoes within the districts, which will save both time and fuel. And then we have an intergovernmental agreement and a joint project with India on the creation of a joint military transport aircraft with a payload of up to 20 tons - MTA. We are ready to purchase such machines up to one hundred units.

The issue of mobility without military transport aircraft will not be resolved. And I believe that the aircraft fleet for these purposes should be no less than 300 aircraft of various classes. Super heavy, heavy, operational-tactical, light, each to complete its task.

The General Staff set the task for us: for those troops that are in the combat force of the Armed Forces, we need to have planes for the transfer of heavy brigades, medium and light. Easy should instantly in any corner of the country or abroad, in connection with our international obligations to solve their problems. How? Only using military transport aviation.

- And the helicopters?

- My favorite army aviation (they say that front-line pilots do not like army aviation - this is a profound mistake). We, like no one, understand the role and place of army aviation in modern armed conflicts that occur and will continue to occur. And its role is understood by the leadership of the Ministry of Defense. Including the Minister, and the Chief of General Staff.

We stated that we were buying a thousand helicopters before 20. Including the heavy Mi-26 helicopters in the Mi-26T variant, this is already a helicopter, we have more than one hundred units. We are improving and have received a modified Mi-8 helicopter, the latest modification of AMTSH, MTV-5. Next - we are doing an all-weather, round-the-clock helicopter with enhanced combat capabilities. Again, based on the Mi-8. The industry offers us a transitional helicopter, between heavy and medium - Mi-38. This machine also has a certain perspective.

- And what role will play Mi-38?

- The Mi-38 is the medium helicopter between the Mi-26 and the Mi-8. These are other engines, another payload. Some states say that the Mi-26 is too heavy, they do not need it. But with a payload of 12 tons, 15 tons, 8 tons would be very useful. This is the class of this helicopter.

Russian Helicopters are addressing this issue. We told them: you first create this product, and then we will see for what purpose and for what purposes to use it.

Now about combat. You know, for a long time in the press and among experts there were disputes as to whether it was better - Mi-28 or Ka-52. It was adopted, in my opinion, a very competent state decision to make both cars. They, in fact, complement each other. Mi-28 as a linear primary helicopter on the battlefield.

In modern conditions, and here I am grateful for the support of the Minister of Defense, that all aviation, with the exception of fleet aviation and everything related to solving fleet tasks, is all concentrated in the Air Force. On the one hand, there are more tasks, but on the other hand, all local interests have gone, all the more so since all management is now under the direction of the General Staff. And the planning of the application, and the organization of combat training. I think this is a very good decision made by the leadership of the Ministry of Defense. This is my personal belief. Although, as always, we like something, do not like something, but life will show.

THE MANAGEMENT LEVEL REVOLUTION

“In connection with this remark, we moved on to the important question that I wanted to ask you.” How is aviation going today? It is known that all of it was transferred to the districts or to the operational-strategic command, 7 air bases were created, 28 airfields were repaired, and other, frankly, revolutionary changes were carried out. What is now engaged in the commander in chief of the Air Force and its headquarters?

- I would say that. If the conceived control system with instruments and systems is implemented, an automated control system (ACS) is created, then everything is built correctly. Now, in my opinion, we are somewhat revolutionary in many matters. And these revolutionary steps are acutely felt in the planned work. Without completing the creation of one technically, organizationally, we may have completed this, we have to manually adjust something, correct it. But we do not refuse to solve these problems.

I have buttons on the remote for calling all four district commanders. We chat online with them often. And most importantly - the combat training remained with the main command of the Air Force. Construction of the form and combat training. And without combat training what could be the application?

There are disputes. We prove something to each other. I do not think that all issues are resolved. And the minister is talking about this. Yes, we have completed all the organizational arrangements. Let's see. If something does not suit someone, prove, show, tell. We will correct. Either agree, or come and prove that something is wrong. Today we held a meeting on this issue. I do not criticize the decisions made. Yes, at the decision-making stage I proved my point of view, my vision for solving the upcoming problems, I had to agree somewhere, somewhere they listened to me on some issues, but since we are at the stage of decisions already taken, we need to follow them. Work.

And in matters related to the problems of technical support of management (an automated control system is being created, which has not fully earned yet, but it starts from the Central Command Center of the General Staff), errors are now being eliminated. The central command centers of the species were eliminated, but until the ACS was operational, we came to the conclusion that the management of the commander in chief of the organization and control of combat training must be restored. Now all decisions are made, agreed and control is restored. The Chief of General Staff supported us. But, I think, this authority will become obsolete when other technical means appear that will allow me, as commander in chief, to deal online with the main issue — the organization of combat training.

More than 70 – 80 of our parts fly daily. All this needs to be monitored, coordinated, controlled, the Air Force is the kind that is constantly in motion and constantly demands control. Not just set the task and forget, but set the task, further control how it is executed and control its results. On another it is impossible.

- Then you adjust them.

- Yes.

- In continuation of this problem, a question arises with air defense. You transferred to the districts not only aircraft, but also to the Aerospace Defense Brigade.

- We are not all air defense brigade transferred to the aerospace defense. We transferred the East Kazakhstan region only the central industrial region. The one that once covered the Moscow air defense district, then the special forces command, then the operational-strategic command as part of the Air Force. In the end, we transferred this USC to the new branch of the East Kazakhstan region. And, in fact, they are now engaged in air defense and missile defense of the Central Industrial District. Moscow and all that surrounds it.

The remaining air defense tasks are assigned to district commanders. But again, the main command is engaged in the combat training of these troops. We are preparing the troops, we are preparing the entire regulatory framework, methodological base, we are conducting exercises, preparing the troops for the exercises and everything else. And district commanders accept troops and use them for their intended purpose. Here is such a subtlety.

- And who orders military equipment?

- Ordering management. But its ideology is built by the Air Force Main Board.

- So you determine how much C-300 is needed, how many C-400, C-500 ... Use C-300B or C-300ВМ?

- So far this ideology is behind the Air Force. Until. But what happens next, we'll see. I emphasize once again that the troops of the East Kazakhstan region are tackling the problems of the Central Industrial Region.

And everything that will be connected with the strategic missile defense and theater missile defense systems, too, naturally, will be confined to the leadership of these troops. They will build an ideology here. But in any case, all decisions will be taken by the General Staff. Naturally, with the active participation of all species and genera. Because it is impossible to talk about air defense, not understanding what role aviation plays here, the fleet, especially in the coastal areas, where it plays the main role, is a complex task. And only one control body can decide it - the General Staff.

- Clear. But then the question arises with the air defense of the Ground Forces. Should they also enter this system or remain under the authority of the commanders of the combined-arms brigades?

- There are so many opinions about this. I believe that in modern conditions the protection of troops on the battlefield is the task of the air defense of the Ground Forces. But, besides this, it is impossible not to talk about the organicity of inscribing them into other systems. We must look at our doctrine. If we plan to conduct military operations outside the Russian Federation, this is one approach. If we say that we will defend ourselves, this is a different approach. But they, the air defense troops and the air defense troops of the Ground Forces, complement each other. According to the tasks. And it is necessary, of course, to create a unified air defense command and control system on the territory of Russia in order to eliminate all these discrepancies.

On the territory of the district commander commanded, for God's sake. I argued on this topic for a very long time, I argued and told me that this was apparently a mistake. I do not want to say whether I am right or not, but I have a special opinion. But all decisions are made, and we are obliged to comply with them.

At the same time, whether we like it or not, but from the Central Command Post of the General Staff this task will be solved, and it is one of the main tasks of the strategic actions of the Armed Forces, there is no doubt. And it is written in such a way that the main executor of this task is the central military command body represented by the General Staff. As soon as the technical management is fully completed, what we talked about - the network-centric management was created, then everything will fall into place. And the decision-making system and the organization of the decision-making of all strategic actions will naturally fall into another plane. This is our near future. We see it, we understand it, but it has not come up yet.

COMBAT TRAINING GOES ON PLAN

- You have already dealt with this issue. But I asked you to talk about it in more detail later. About the flying of pilots. I remember history with Major Troyanov when he got lost in the skies over the Baltic and was forced to eject over Lithuania. It turned out that his raid did not exceed seven hours. You said that the task was to fly the 130 watch. How to solve this problem? And further. 130 hours - is it only for fighter and ground attack aircraft, or for strategic and military transport? Are there also such standards?

- No, there is an order of the Minister of Defense about the norms of the raid. They are defined. And depending on the type of aircraft, from the position of the pilot different rates of attack. For example, the command staff of the norm is half or one and a half less than the rest of the pilots, the commander does not need such a raid. Although at the expense of instructor flights or flights on training, the flight of the management personnel will be much greater than that of the ordinary pilot, who is engaged in his personal improvement. And if we talk about Troyanov, then I would not so much blame the pilot and recall his raid ...

- By the way, what was his fate?

- He left the flight after that incident. As a matter of fact, no organizational or administrative measures were taken against him. And flight qualifications for him saved. Although in principle the pilot of the 1 class could not be so wrong. But I believe that the main mistake there was in the organization of the flight and in the unsatisfactory organization of management. In fact, the crew was lost and no one drove them. This is what we talked about a little earlier about the management system.

The control system and the organization of the control system, some do not understand this, but due to the nature of their activities, the aircraft just doesn’t fly into the air. Aircraft at all stages, from take-off to landing, are controlled by people on the ground, controlled by organs that are directly obliged to be engaged in this control. And the aircraft is controlled at three measurement points - height, azimuth, and so on. And if someone thinks that it is so easy to take and fly somewhere there, he is greatly mistaken and does not understand anything. Moreover, now the whole world has switched to dependent automatic observation.

The corresponding means are deployed in space, on the ground, on aircraft — I saw it, for example, when I was in Japan, at a civil aviation control center. At the main airport of Tokyo saw the planes that flew in the sky over Australia. It would seem that in this Asia-Pacific space there are no ground-based means of observation; nevertheless, an aircraft was visible on request over the fifth continent. This is a huge distance. And the whole world is now switching to this method of controlling the airspace.

Yes, that's right, we do not refuse radar, we will see the aircraft, if the pilot turns it on, if he turns it off, we will not see it. But for reliable security and precise control in peacetime, such a system is extremely necessary in order to qualitatively improve flight safety and the aviation control system. Including general aviation.

Now the entire aviation control system in the United States, in Europe, is built on the fact that the aircraft is still taxiing on the ground, and on the locator screens a signal has already appeared that the application has passed, the aircraft has been approved, its flight task has been agreed that it can calmly carry out the notification . The notification is a completely different approach.

But for reliable security and precise control in peacetime, such a system is extremely necessary in order to qualitatively improve flight safety and the aviation control system. Including general aviation.

Now the entire aviation system in the United States, in Europe, is built on the fact that the aircraft still taxis on the ground, and on the screens of the locators a signal has already appeared that the application has passed, the aircraft has been approved, its flight task is consistent, that it can safely perform the notification by notification. The notification is a completely different approach.

- Well, all the same, if we return to the problem of plaque.

- As for the material security, there are no questions here. I am concerned only with the resource support of airplanes and helicopters, which is designed to solve this problem.

- That is, with kerosene everything is in order?

- The presence of kerosene, fuel and other means I absolutely do not care. Everything is, it is not those years. Airfields, fuels and lubricants, we even entered into agreements with CJSC Gazpromneft-Aero, at 12 airfields we have this network deployed - the so-called outsourcing. He is already in the work. Most worried about the health and resource provision. Unfortunately, our Aviaremont structure does not respond so pragmatically to all the needs that we need, as it should. I still can not understand what is the reason.

Money for repairs and restoration allocated. And considerable ones. If you compare with the time 90-s, then at times. There are financial opportunities, responsibilities are defined, specifications are also. There is a lack of promptness and responsibility of officials who are obliged to do this. Unfortunately, only the Main Command of the Air Force, which is responsible for combat training, is sick of the serviceability of military equipment. For some reason, our other structures are responsible only for financial flows.

Hence the problem. But if last year we flew about 340 thousands of hours, we gave more 90 hours on each flyer. This is a different patina - depending on the type of aircraft. This year I set the task, especially in relation to the young pilots, to fly at least 100 hours.

Last year, 80% of young people met these standards. Some lieutenants sagged, but not because of their own fault, but because there was no resource support. And most importantly, they reacted inopportunely to forwarding them to other parts, where this task could be solved. Later we solved this problem, but they did not receive the 100 watches, but a little more 50. But these are not five, not seven, not two hours, which were in 90-ies.

- But your pilots fly, not only to improve individual training, but also, apparently, to solve complex tasks as part of exercises in the districts? Do you take part in these events?

- Of course, in all large-scale exercises, if you paid attention, aviation plays a significant role. If not the main one. Everyone looks at what is happening in the air.

- And in what major exercises you will take part this year?

- In all. Everything that has been planned is all about aviation. We have a plan for aviation support of all activities. He was approved by the Chief of General Staff, and we are very actively involved in all exercises.

WITH CARE OF PEOPLE

- The question of the social problems of the Air Force. Increased two to three times the salaries for pilots.

- We understand with them. A single settlement center was created, it was only the second month that they started paying higher salaries, something didn’t work somewhere. We'll figure it out and fix it. People understand: all that is stated, they will receive. Not now, then later.

- Did the maintenance of money, for example, the squadron commander grow great?

- This is comparable to those payments that the pilots received on the 400-th order. And this is many times more than it was before the increase. Specific figures can be clarified in order not to deceive readers.

- What about housing?

- Housing set up a lot. You drove through Balashikha, saw how much of it. More than 6 thousands of apartments. And in the suburbs are building. But this account of ours was ruined, was in the apartment-operational parts, now they have made a single bank. We often have failures. Every Friday, including yesterday, Nikolai Egorovich (Makarov. - V.L.) holds a meeting on this issue. I don’t know when this failure will take place, but I’ve already told mine that if we don’t correct the situation on the ground, starting with the divisions and above, we won’t understand what is going on here, what should we expect from above ?! You have to figure it out yourself at the part level.

Unfortunately, part of the aviation units went to the districts, as we have said before. I, as the commander in chief, cannot influence the state of affairs there. But I have no reason to do this work. There are territorial bodies that are called upon to solve these problems. But it is impossible not to say that some officers are also irresponsible about these issues - the notice has come, and they do not draw up documents. Specially or thoughtlessly delay time. Do not fully represent the documents that should be.

The situations are different. Someone has housing, but still tries to grab. There are many temptations. The armed forces today are the only structure where people, according to the law, receive housing from the state.

Service housing has already been planned for the main bases; in fact, we will have seven base airfields for aircraft and 14 base airfields for army aviation; service housing will be created there. Everything else, whether we like it or not, will eventually go to the municipal. We will give all the towns there.

Another question is to allow the officers - well, he does not want to stay in Morozovsk or Millerovo, where beautiful apartments were built for withdrawal from the Western group of troops, but there is no industry - to go elsewhere. I believe that this opportunity can be given to officers. Although, on the other hand, people are provided with housing.

Here we have the village of Zarya, who also want to get housing in the Moscow region. We were allowed to transfer apartments from service to municipal. And the tension here is mostly relieved. With me, as I became the commander in chief, there were already three houses built. It remains only to arrange these houses, and 100 people in the main command will find a roof over their heads. Plus part of the provision, and I completely remove the task of official housing.

- Another pressing question is about education. Including the scandal that erupted due to the transfer of the Academy of Zhukovsky and Gagarin to Voronezh. What is the reason for this and what will happen to the beautiful Aviation Museum located in Monino?

- The museum as it was and will remain. He will enter the branch in the Central Museum of the Armed Forces, and no one does not encroach on him.

About the Academy. I answered this question a lot. Why such a rich country as the United States of America, have only three military universities. For the training of officers. Has anyone asked this question? Why can't they spread a network of educational institutions across the country? Why is this in England? On instructions from the minister, I and my subordinates, and these famous people - General Kharchevsky, General Gradusov, Colonel Bareev, God willing, will soon be a general - this is the elite of the modern Air Force, went on a business trip and almost a week watched the organization of combat training of the USAF. Were at the Pentagon, in all commands, including at the airbase in Nelis. By Soviet standards, it can be compared with the base in Marakh, where I once served.

We were also in Colorado Springs and in that academy where thousands of cadets in four courses study at the same time 4. And where every year from 1 thousands of 500 graduates become pilots. 500 they recruit from other universities. I studied their experience in great detail; surprisingly, my colleagues also provided me with a training program, even under the heading “Service literature”, the conversation was completely open. And I agree that everything should be concentrated in one place. Including financial and material resources.

Yes, what are we losing? In that, for example, from Siberia there is no possibility for all the guys to come and enroll in Voronezh University, but this is our task. To organize visiting commissions, conduct competitive tests and find guys who will not only study from the European part of Russia, but also from the Far East. This is the task of the species to do the selection of cadets. Including outreach work. Recruit healthy, strong guys, and these are needed in the Air Force. We used to joke once: gain health, and ask for the mind.

This is another task. But to have a network and spray money is not wise.

Yury Petrovich Klishin, this former deputy head of armaments, when he got into modern Voronezh, called from there and said: “Alexander Nikolayevich, I never expected what Vasily Zibrov did there in such a short time with his team”. Still, this is still not enough. The minister says to me: “You go to cadet colleges and see what has been done there. What means are there created to prepare the boys. And it is quite possible to do so. ”

One more thing. There, near Voronezh in 90 kilometers of Lipetsk, Lipetsk training center, which allows for the training and training of officers already operational-tactical level. All the advanced technology is there.

I do not want to offend anyone. But in recent years, our science, including the faculty, has grown very old and has lagged behind the modern demands that the last five years have shown us. Especially the last three years. And we, as the press likes to write, continue to fight the experience of past wars. And I do not want to fight the experience of past wars. I respect the faculty, we really need to preserve it, we need to create a center - we have made such a proposal to the head of the Department of Education of the Armed Forces, such work is underway. But, frankly speaking, the training base, with the exception of the “T” corps (the training corps at the Gagarin Academy. - VL), is as old as this world. Yes, and there all the aircraft simulators that go out of this life.

All new is created in Voronezh. All modern ACS, modern simulators, modern ... So I finished the school, there were already MiG-23 and MiG-25, rockets for them and everything else. And we all flew the MiG-21, studied the US missiles, the PC2C, which was no longer in the military. That was the system. All the equipment that came to the school then was the one that left the troops.

And we say no. We must teach what is and will be in the army. Now we are finishing training at the school on an advanced training aircraft. This does not apply to air defense forces, there is already all the most modern. They do not need to fly, they must come to the troops and immediately sit down at the crew’s control consoles and begin combat work.

The pilot has a different system. We give him a flying time and a higher combat training machine. Then he comes to the state center, where we teach him to fight. And from there to the troops, where he has already been trained and taught everything. And on the technique of combat use begins to fly and perform the combat mission.

I was lucky enough to listen to Pavel Stepanovich Kutakhov as a young pilot. I remembered his words for life. I was in 3 Squadron Lieutenant Zelin. 1976 year. Marshal took the chalk and began to draw on the blackboard. “This is the task I am sending it to carry out a first class pilot. To solve another problem, the link of the second class pilots. And for this I need to send the whole squadron of third-class pilots. ” Even then it was clear what a pilot of one or another class means, how to encourage pilots to improve their class skills. When they paid for class, for clouds, for that, for that ...

And now they tell us: guys, we pay you too much. For the class will not pay. I think this is absolutely wrong. The motivation of the flight crew is not least connected with the assessment of its activities. I don’t think that they didn’t think about it in Soviet times and just paid money.

- We talked about pilots. But you also have meteorologists, navigators, weapons specialists. Where to learn them?

- All - in one Voronezh University. There it is planned to create a Military Scientific Center or a State University for the training of aviation specialists.

- Where are the technicians? TECH Specialists?

- And technicians there. All in Voronezh. Currently, everyone is studying there. All engineering schools that were in 2009 began training there. Irkutsk, then Stavropol, then Tambov communication school ... All were concentrated in one place. Our only branch will be the Krasnodar College, which will train pilots. Flight crew and military command officers.

- And foreigners?

- And foreigners. In our city Voronezh is trained by all personnel, which is connected with the issues of comprehensive support of aviation activities. Rear, technical. Everything connected with it. We are preparing pilots directly in Krasnodar.

And the academic education, I did not specify, which we received in the Academy of Zhukovsky and Gagarin, it is abolished. We are moving to coursework. We will not issue a second diploma. We will issue the appropriate document at the end of the course. And then for each upcoming position the officer will be prepared specifically for such courses. This will occur in Voronezh and Lipetsk at the operational-tactical level. And accordingly in the Academy of the General Staff.

- The very last question. "Swifts" and "Russian Knights" remain?

- Nobody touches them. Nobody ever thought so.

- And on the Yak-130 they will fly?

- On the Yak-130, as soon as we receive them, we will also create a squadron to fly with smoke colorfully, like, say, Patrol de France or Triche de Color, others.

We often declare that we are the only ones who fly combat aircraft. But in life it is not. I traveled the world, looked. Americans fly on F-16 Air Force, Navy flies on F-18, demonstration flights. Previously, the Air Force flew T-50, but after the whole group broke up, it was such a difficult tragedy, they all switched to F-16. And the sea pilots both flew the F-18 and continue to fly. The Japanese, too, fly in combat aircraft. The South Koreans were flying combat, but now they have created their own T-50. This is practically a prototype of the F-16, they created a training machine for it. And the Italians buy from them, if I'm not mistaken.

When I was at their anniversary party dedicated to the 60 anniversary, I asked them: why don't you buy our planes? They took and wrote that we tendered our T-50. Ours immediately refused.

99 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +18
    17 March 2012 07: 09
    Great article !!! I would read and read !!! smile fellow
    1. +10
      17 March 2012 07: 35
      Especially numbers please !!!
      1. Paratov
        +6
        17 March 2012 13: 58
        He would drink it with his lips and honey! ..
      2. 0
        19 March 2012 05: 34
        Quote: Dmitriy69
        Especially numbers please !!!


        we have a staffing factor of one and a half.

        some numbers are not encouraging ... plans were developed for some distant 30s, but now the pilots are not able to fly on anything ... there are one and a half times more pilots than airplanes .. and if we take into account the number of airplanes for maintenance and repair, then the figure it may turn out to be worse ... you can certainly plan before the 30s and 50s, but what will we do if a crisis occurs in 3-5 years? ... too much, then everything happens leisurely and in gracious relaxation ...
        1. 0
          19 March 2012 11: 33
          Well, yes they are wizards, they will now say: Akhalai Mahalai Sim Salabim and all the Air Force are equipped.
    2. 0
      17 March 2012 08: 02
      Chief ... when will you remove the warning?
      I, like, do not call anyone else.
      How much time is there before the warning is removed?
      Or will I be in life .... with a lily on my shoulder?
    3. 443190
      +4
      18 March 2012 00: 44
      A quick fairy tale affects. Yes, not soon the thing is done.
  2. YARY
    +3
    17 March 2012 07: 16
    In general, the prospect for the article looms quite acceptable. Not for all indicators, but not all at once. Although there are a number of issues of a purely comparative nature.
  3. +9
    17 March 2012 07: 22
    UUUUH, it took my breath away from such words ... I remembered the cars that they don’t even talk about .. If even half of what the commander-in-chief said will be finished by the 20 year, hold on to your own tail ... Aviation is reborn .. Congratulations to the flyers !!!
    1. Sokol peruna
      +5
      17 March 2012 09: 26
      If even half of what the commander-in-chief said will be done by the 20th year


      Then, by 2020, the Russian Air Force will consist of approximately 300 combat aircraft.
    2. VAF
      VAF
      +17
      17 March 2012 10: 23
      Quote: domokl
      UUUUH, already captured the breath from such words ..


      With all due respect, shuravi, but !!! recourse

      I understand that now I will draw the wrath of a respected audience, but the article, or rather the speech of the Air Force Group, personally did not cause me any particularly bright prospects. !!! request
      Now I explain. By the nature of my activity, I was “a little familiar with aviation”, changed 7 aviation garrisons and 5 kinds of aviation, therefore, not by hearsay (pompous articles for the layman and speeches of various kinds of heads of military departments etc.) and I continue to communicate with everyone colleagues, and I regularly go to the regiments on the anniversary dates, where I once served, so I want to share with you the real situation:
      1. The only positive thing is that it has finally reached the Very Top, that something has been “created” with aviation over 20 years of control by the “democrats” and + “Taburetkin’s reforms” is .... And if we continue in the same spirit, then soon we will “sink to the level of the Papuans” !!!
      I will only deal with the Air Force, as in other types of aircraft the same, I hope, there are “healthy” people who can clarify the real situation.
      So, what we have today, or rather we do not have:
      1. The complete "collapse" and its actual destruction of the Navy-strike, fighter aviation, the pitiful remnants of the anti-submarine remained!
      2. "Reforming" YES, led to the fact that in the end we have about 30 (!) pieces of Tu-22M3 flying and a few aircraft with a remaining resource of 10-15 hours for, .... It is clear what)!)
      3. The strategists are a little better, there is at least a shuk of 60-70 Tu-95s, but the situation with the flight sides is the same as with long-range ones.
      4. "Reformed" fighter and fighter-bomber aviation, i.е. disbanded and overclocked 14VA, 23VA, 40VA, 24VA, etc. and the living "remnants" are brought to the so-called "air bases of the base."
      5. What kind of 1,5 composition is the Civil Code talking about, if even in the best times for aviation, each regiment commander could only dream of such a composition?
      Well, of course, if you can disperse one VA out of 10 regiments, then of course it is possible, but for some reason he is silent about the fact that at least 50% of the flight personnel must be fully restored, not to mention the need to maintain the level of training of the active personnel?
      6. What kind of VTA can we talk about if the new IL-76 is only undergoing stationary tests and has not even started flying yet?
      7. An-124 left a few alive in Seshche, the rest are used by the "comers" in the "Volga-Dnepr". And the production is only in Ulyanovsk, which all the other plants have already “grabbed” (I already wrote about Aviacor Samara, with a photo, so I won’t repeat myself).
      8. For whom is it written, according to the list, in the composition, etc. ??? Of these, it’s really alive, as I wrote above, 3-5 planes !!!
      9. What is your favorite number 100??? And for FBA-100, and for air defense -100? And the creation (?) of operational groups of 20-40 aircraft?
      10. I don’t talk about the airfield network at all, because out of 1200 only…. Okay, you know.
      11. About salaries in the 1970s - clouds, etc. it's "cheesy" to put it mildly!
      The respected Air Force Group confused the times after the 50s, when aviation was “Stalin's Falcons” and when Moskvich could be bought with one paycheck, and nowadays, in 1970, the only premiums were for this class, according to the results of the year and 13 "pay if without comment and criticism!" Well, of course, “fighting” for those who participated! And that’s it.
      Now, of course, they have undoubtedly done as they should and as they should, while they still “threw” pensioners !!!
      12. About the training of amers, there are no words at all, hopes that no one knows how and how much they have?
      What is NG aviation, air force reserve aviation, navy reserve aviation, etc.
      Do not be too lazy to read, learn a lot of new and interesting things!
      13. And about the association of the Air Force and Air Defense + Aerospace Defense, who thought of this, huh?
      In general, I will round off, because This theme is endless!
      For me personally, this article evokes associations of speeches by the Secretary General of the CPSU at the next congress.
      Everywhere there is a "great deal" of plans, deliveries of "meager", deadlines !!!
      And if God forbid at 13 or 14, then how, on what, and who ???? what
      The question is, why was everything “broken” and “reformed” like this! am
      1. Oleg0705
        +1
        17 March 2012 11: 16
        veteran.air force (1) The biggest mysteries lie in what we see, not what is hidden from our eyes. wink
        1. VAF
          VAF
          +7
          17 March 2012 12: 25
          Quote: Oleg0705
          not what is hidden from our eyes.


          I will try to show what is "hidden from your eyes"! recourse

          When I see it live, my heart is already pouring blood !!!

          And after all, everyone knows it perfectly well, who has done it all and is doing it "!!!
          1. +5
            17 March 2012 12: 32
            on a / d 224 regiment vta the same picture only silt 76
            1. VAF
              VAF
              +6
              17 March 2012 14: 10
              Quote: kosmos84
              on a / d 224 regiment vta the same picture only silt 76


              I agree with you completely!
              I no longer began to spread the information about the rest of our "hardware part", and how they cut and broke cars with a touch of 2-3 hours after the CWR and almost all releases of the mid-80s and above !!! am
      2. 0
        17 March 2012 11: 38
        For Veteran.air force- yes they are harnessed for a long time, but I’m not talking about that, check out the link http://www.arms-expo.ru/055057052124050055049048055.html I suppose it will be interesting for you.
        1. VAF
          VAF
          +2
          17 March 2012 16: 28
          Quote: saturn.mmm
          yes harness for a long time


          They have been harnessing for a very long time and slowly, and it would not have been easier not to unharness, and if not able to, then let it go, not "reform" and "reduce" ?!
          Ruin everything, and now successfully overcome all difficulties and shortcomings ?!
  4. +14
    17 March 2012 07: 28
    - I have already told someone from foreign correspondents: to determine whether it is better or worse, you need to see how the car behaves in the air.
    1. +3
      17 March 2012 10: 03
      This is the moment when the capture of a modern radar (PAR) occurs.
      1. VAF
        VAF
        +5
        17 March 2012 14: 06
        Quote: almost demobilized
        modern radar (HEADLOCK) is a capture failure.


        And who told you such a heresy ??? fool
        1. +2
          17 March 2012 17: 08
          And you, comrade veteran, have probably become a veteran for a very long time. Well, it doesn’t matter, sit back. The thing is that modern fighters are equipped with phased-array radar radios, shortly HEADLIGHTS. The diagram is controlled not by the movement of the reflector, but by scanning the beam from this same headlamp. The principle of action is not pulsed. as you probably think, it’s quasicontinuous using the Doppler principle. In order for the sight to see and capture, the approach speed is necessary, according to the velocity component and the range is calculated in the special calculator. And with this maneuver, the approach speed drops sharply and the capture fails. Probably this is not on the Mig-21? tongue And please do not poke, not solid.
          1. VAF
            VAF
            +3
            17 March 2012 21: 58
            Quote: almost demobilized
            And you, comrade veteran, have apparently become a veteran for a very long time. Well, it doesn’t matter, sit back.




            Belatedly, I apologize for the incorrectness! love
            And with, your permission, I will sit down, otherwise at my age, "sitting" is no longer comfortable, although, as they say, "...... do not renounce ?!" lol

            You are absolutely right, there weren’t 21 and there weren’t 23, but I was 31 and I didn’t care what aerobatics the target found by my operator on D 85 km, which was captured and missile launched on D-80 km .
            These maneuvers are carried out when conducting highly maneuverable combat at extremely short distances using short-range missiles and cannon weapons, then your theory is suitable, but when conducting this type of battle, radar is again used to detect a target and take it to an auto circuit, and not to detect and go closer, so that then the target could fulfill all kinds of PIM, PFP, PZM, etc.?!
            I hope now put it within the acceptable range, did not upset anything? request
            1. 0
              18 March 2012 05: 41
              And still, they were disappointed! If the launch is completed, then yes, the fighter leaves the attack, then the rocket works on its own and it doesn’t really matter what maneuvers the target performs, especially at the final stage of the rapprochement between the target and the missile. R-33 she has a small margin of overload and speed of mining the GSN. It is realistic to leave even just with an energetic military U-turn. wink
              But when conducting a highly maneuverable battle, the R-60 (m) missile is used. So in this case, "my theory" just does not fit because The thermal seeker is absolutely on the drum such a feint, it has an overload of up to 15 G. And the radar is used, but not necessarily. Enough TK, well, TK + radar.
              1. VAF
                VAF
                0
                18 March 2012 21: 52
                Quote: almost demobilized
                So in this case, "my theory" just doesn't fit


                Here you correctly formulated, put +!
                I wrote you a treatise on the inappropriateness of using maneuvers of an aircraft such as Cobra Pugachev, Hook, Chakra Frolov, Kulbit, Double Cross, etc. with mathematical calculations, technical data and capabilities of the PRNK and missiles, but I sent something with the server in the morning, and still not, well, and the second time I cut it all off!
                In short, where did you get the information that 60 can be up to 15g ??? The maximum is up to 8, but 77 is up to 12g, but this is not the main criterion. it all depends on the coordinator of the rocket head and on the angular accelerations and angular displacements, and not on "braking"!
                And if for some reason I could not start 60 ku with D 1000-1500 meters, then I continue to converge with the target and already with D 300-500 meters into a practically stationary "target" otherwise you cannot call the plane reared up with an angle of attack more than 120g or doing a "somersault" over the head, ie Kulbit and increasing its area of ​​damage to 100-150m sq. I dare to assure you that I will "slap" everything to one shell!
                That's something like that, if very simple and intelligible! fellow
                1. -1
                  19 March 2012 07: 31
                  Guilty, I forgot. the R-60m has an overload of 12 units, the V of the TGS deviation is 35 gsec, but not the point, I’m saying that the r-60 is somersault according to the dick.
                  I wouldn’t advise opening fire from a cannon with D = 300-500 m. At a speed of 900 km / h this is 1-2 seconds. Maybe you have time to press the trigger, maybe the BC GSh-6-23 will have time to fly out all, but turn away then you certainly won’t have time. Better according to the bp manual wink
  5. +6
    17 March 2012 07: 50
    The article is good.
    But, somehow the question about the academy and the creation of a huge center in Voronezh is not very clear to me.
    Why in Voronezh, if Lipetsk is nearby?
    There is noticeable indignation that he cannot steer in full measure ... the district commanders control everything.
    Let it all go on. Settles, sooner or later.
    Go Russia.
    1. +4
      17 March 2012 08: 48
      So it is, now it is not clear who steers whom. The general commander of the district seems to be the main one. but it doesn’t understand in aviation. Subordination of the Communist Party is appropriate. Now, the superior Communist Party is afraid to set tasks for the subordinate, as some officers of the lower Communist Party send stupid superior members away and do what they themselves need. You have no idea. Well, Russia, yes, go ahead!
  6. +8
    17 March 2012 08: 20
    Because we have a staffing factor of one and a half. And in order to give everyone the opportunity to fly at the current staffing level, a two-cabin machine allows combat flights to be performed for the entire flight crew. Train both. Thus, everyone will be constantly in the training, and we will comply with the instructions of the Chief of the General Staff so that we have more than 130 hours of flying time
    I don’t understand from this, is a two-cab car valuable in that it allows you to overestimate the pilots' flying hours? can you expect a four-cabin then?
    1. +1
      17 March 2012 08: 43
      The point is that in a 2-cabin aircraft the control is duplicated, you can immediately put the instructor and the student in and not make a special twin-plane
      1. VAF
        VAF
        +1
        17 March 2012 22: 34
        Quote: almost demobilized
        The point is that in a 2-cabin aircraft the control is duplicated, you can immediately put an instructor


        Strongly incorrect opinion, because:
        1. The Air Force Group made such a statement from without source, because Sparky is a very, very large deficit, although in our time they were so scarce, but then they flew 10 times more, and in number 100 times more pilots.
        2. And then what about the second operator-pilot or navigator? Does he have his own tolerances and breaks, and besides flying, is he also in combat use?
        So first we take the pilot, then restore the navigator, etc.
        Well, how can you not be rude here again? And, I will answer about Chernomor - "... they wanted the best, but it turned out as always?"
        3.And here with ease, we will use combat vehicles and this says the Air Force Group ???
        And their resource, and BZ, DB, etc. or does he have an eternal school of study ???
        Nowadays, combat aircraft were courting and counting every hour spent in the air and what can be put into planned No. 1, and what is impossible and everything has always been under very tight control !!
        And here with ease, we do a raid on combat ??? fool
        4. In my time, when I was retraining for the 31st, so that they wouldn’t knock out we used the Mig-25PU for training and for recovery!
        1. +3
          18 March 2012 05: 48
          I agree with you, it is not rational to use combat sides for recovery. But here what is called not to fat, the pants would be supported. If we also do sparks, then in general there will be a blockage.
          1. VAF
            VAF
            +2
            18 March 2012 09: 47
            Quote: almost demobilized
            I agree with you, it is not rational to use combat sides for recovery.


            In the first part I agree, in the second not, but still +!
            And without sparks anywhere, they are simply necessary !!!
  7. +13
    17 March 2012 08: 29
    I had the opportunity to serve under his command. With all due respect to Alexander Nikolaevich, I cannot agree with this:This does not apply to the air defense forces, everything is already up-to-date there. They don’t need to fly, they have to come to the troops and immediately sit down at the control panels of combat crew and begin combat work.Then Alexander Nikolaevich put it mildly wishful thinking. I’ll explain. Now the equipment for command and control units and connections is more or less modern with automation and display equipment, they install what is needed for the work of the commander or commander of the connection, which immediately catches the eye of the inspector, zhurnalyuga, commissions. All these terminal devices look rather modern. although they were released 10-15 years ago. But it’s worth asking about the peripherals, the means of communication with units and subdivisions — you’ll be in a shit. What’s in the units even can be called scrap metal with a stretch. Maybe someone heard about the R-140 r / s? of the units, information about the air situation then goes (should go), and with such provision of units and subunits, the cost of all ACS of a link is a union. Alexander Nikolaevich, due to the fact that there is a transition to VKO-air defense, being closely engaged in the Air Force (airplanes), has somewhat lost touch with reality. And for aviation he does a great job!
    1. +7
      17 March 2012 10: 16
      Quote: almost demobilized
      What is in the units, even scrap metal can be called a stretch. Maybe someone heard about r / s R-140?


      Ohrenet. I remember in the Strategic Missile Forces it was replaced in 1986 by more modern stations of KV and VHF-range. Now at the PPU in communication brigades they use, in my opinion, R-166 and R-419 ("Artek" seems to be called on the basis of KAMAZ-43114) r-140 I remember back in the early 80s at the Department of Communications and BU training, I didn’t think that they were somewhere else, although the equipment is reliable and good, but life does not stand still. And lately
      I heard that the communications in the Strategic Missile Forces are being transferred to "digital". In general, communication has always been a "sore spot" for us, as access to the PC and the transition from wire to radio immediately began with some kind of hemorrhoid and which is characteristic every time it is different.
  8. +1
    17 March 2012 08: 32
    Really wonderful article. Main smooth progressive dynamics in almost all directions.
  9. +1
    17 March 2012 08: 45
    I am glad that all military aviation is calmly and systematically developing in all directions, without sharp fluctuations and heels. And so it is necessary, as it seems to me, step by step, without storming.
    1. VAF
      VAF
      +1
      17 March 2012 12: 59
      Quote: comrade Misha
      I am glad that all military aviation is calmly and systematically developing in all directions,


      Only really very calm and too systematic? Is the Yak-130 no longer needed?
      Well, this is understandable, because for 40 cadets a year, can you do with L-39s ??? Especially in one single school!
      But then where "these pilots" fool to do something?
  10. +4
    17 March 2012 09: 28
    That's fine, and little by little, and we are reanimating the power of Russia! Slow but sure! wink
  11. Oleg0705
    +10
    17 March 2012 09: 53
    Nostalgic Poster. And we will be pilots! I really want to be passed on to the younger generation.
  12. Sarus
    +1
    17 March 2012 09: 56
    The Air Force is one of the most important military branches.
    I respect the officers. Especially the fact that many did not run away in 90 but remained and defended the country.
    The authority of the Russian Air Force, I am sure that the highest in the world.
    1. VAF
      VAF
      +4
      17 March 2012 12: 43
      Quote: Sarus
      The Air Force is one of the most important military branches.


      Undeniable !!! good



      Quote: Sarus
      I respect the officers.


      Thanks, with all my heart !!! drinks


      Quote: Sarus
      Especially the fact that many did not run away at 90 but remained
      defended the country


      And we didn’t run away anywhere, but we "ran hard" - "reformed", "made a highly professional army", etc.
      Moreover, the second quote from the words of the current rulers of the Russian state !! angry
  13. 443190
    +1
    17 March 2012 10: 29
    Beautiful article. It remains to wait a bit .... until 2020. And see how all this was translated into reality.
    1. VAF
      VAF
      +3
      17 March 2012 12: 38
      Quote: 443190
      Beautiful article.


      It is very beautiful, especially the quote: "........ According to the list, we have about 300 such aircraft, more precisely, 252 in the Air Force." request

      Here is a group of MiG-31s ​​from this squad .... crying
      1. 0
        17 March 2012 17: 15
        Veteran, how embittered you are. You perfectly understand that this iron is not included in the number 252.
        1. VAF
          VAF
          +6
          17 March 2012 20: 11
          Angry ??? This is not the right word !!!
          Do you want me to show you real pictures on "those that enter?", When on the group side there are both combatants and donors, the last time they never fly?
          Or tell you how, on Saturday at 20.00, during the extreme "war" the signal "Battle alarm" sounded (I hope you know what it is, not an alarm gathering, not to arrive at the place of service or gathering ???).
          And the BZ was delivered with the flight of the link, the 2nd pair at 24.00, and the only living machines are on the BD-pair and the pair in "amplification" and cannot be touched? !!
          And the commander was sitting in the office with a gun, because he knew that we couldn’t catch up at 24.00:XNUMX, and not fulfill the order in a combat situation, do you know what this is ???
          Therefore, when they began to transfer to 02, then 04, and then 06, everyone realized that now we will have time and at 07.00 the link left, including your humble servant !!! But it took almost 10 hours to "compose" the real 4 more cars! The commander then turned gray and after the end of the 10th (in 2007) quit !!!
          So I have already seen and heard enough "sweet" and bravura speeches and marches to the accompaniment of fagnfares, and I know how things are in reality (I beg your pardon for the bullshit)!
          But I never signed up and did not participate in approvals — if something is good, it’s really good, but if well ... well, I’ll say it directly and do it in such a way as to avoid it ... but they don’t do it like that, but that’s it again through ..this is the very place!
          And nothing teaches them (the big bosses) nothing (well, maybe he’s afraid of losing a warm place?) The same thing takes place!
          It’s just that the Civil Code is afraid, maybe it’s true to say that there is something to lose, but to me a pensioner (I’ve got to live here for about 5 years, no more, so why should I be afraid?)
        2. 443190
          +2
          17 March 2012 22: 16
          Who knows ... are they included in the payroll or not ???
          In Djida, in the RCU, we had about 10 years old Su-15. He was abandoned during the distillation from the Far East. Then we had a whole link dislodged on the landing of these handsome men. There were not enough spare wheels for all of the escorting brigade and one side was temporarily left for storage, so to speak. They drove the 3rd AE into the parking lot away from the eyes and closed it in the RCB. Gradually they removed everything that was possible from him ... And the glider still stood. They did not allow him to be scrapped due to the fact that he was listed somewhere in the headquarters as a regular unit of the storage base. So with these birds in the photo there may well be the same story.
          1. VAF
            VAF
            +2
            17 March 2012 23: 50
            Quote: 443190
            So with these birds in the photo there may well be the same story.


            Absolutely! As we said, the result is 000/000! good
            And such cases are just "sea" !!! Yes
            1. 443190
              -1
              18 March 2012 23: 50
              And when relocating the 2nd Guards Regiment from Jida in the fall of 2010, 2 SU-24M had to be thrown to a new location in Chelyabinsk .... Well, they didn’t want to take off ... And there’s AN-22 unsuccessfully fell ... the one that they were promised to help ... Now they are trying to unassembled drag them and Ulan Ude to the aircraft factory for storage. Although the equipment is still listed as regular units of the regiment ...
  14. -3
    17 March 2012 10: 44
    I’m glad that the fighters arrived in the Air Force, I also wanted to launch the IL-112 transport aircraft program, because the AN-140 is a Ukrainian aircraft, and there is no Russian analogue in this class. Something needs to be changed for a large fleet of AN-26 aircraft. And so the article pleases.
    1. VAF
      VAF
      +3
      17 March 2012 12: 55
      Quote: sergey69
      happy with the arrival of fighters in the air force


      Only here the number is orders of magnitude lower than what we supply for export ?? !! request

      Quote: sergey69
      I also wanted to launch the IL-112 transport aircraft program,


      Probably you mean Il-114?
      The Il-114T aircraft was created on the basis of the Il-114 passenger and is intended for the transportation of 7 tons of cargo on local airlines with a length of up to 4800 km under various conditions, including when operating from low-equipped airfields with artificial or unpaved surfaces.

      The aircraft represents a new generation of cargo aircraft in its class. IL-114T can be used to replace the aging fleet of transport aircraft An-26. High aerodynamic qualities combined with low fuel consumption, as well as low maintenance costs make the IL-114T highly economical to operate. It is believed that the cost of transportation on the Il-114T will be half as much as on the An-26.

      At the request of customers, the aircraft can be equipped with foreign-made avionics. CPPK provides automated and manual navigation along equipped and low-equipped routes at any time of the day or year, as well as approach and landing in conditions of the ICAO meteorological minimum I and II.
      1. -2
        17 March 2012 17: 22
        IL-112 light transport-replacement AN-26.
        1. VAF
          VAF
          +2
          17 March 2012 22: 39
          Quote: almost demobilized
          IL-112 light transport-replacement AN-26.


          I won’t scribble much, here’s the latest news on 112, so I asked again, maybe on the 114th?

          The denouement occurred in May 2011. The Russian Ministry of Defense officially announced its decision to purchase a cargo version of the An-140 aircraft. Initially, we are talking about the purchase of 7 aircraft. According to their characteristics, both aircraft are quite similar. Both the An-140 and the Il-112 could equally replace the obsolete An-26. And not only in military squadrons, but also in civilian air cargo transportation. But the An-140 has been honing its characteristics for almost 10 years, being in regular operation, and the Il-112 does not even have the first flying model. Ilyushin lost in time.

          Having lost its main customer, the IL-112 project was still ongoing, and work was underway at VASO to create four models, two of which were, finally, to fly to the sky. On July 20 of this year, the situation in the project worsened completely. Voronezh Aircraft Plant announced the cessation of production of pilot aircraft Il-112V. The decision was not explained in detail. As a remark, it was said that the IL-112 project has certain design flaws and, due to the lack of a main customer for this type of aircraft, work was stopped. An official explanation of the situation, and possibly a message about the closure of the project, must be expected from the lead presenter in the person of Ilyushin Design Bureau.
  15. +3
    17 March 2012 11: 49
    Judging by the article, RSK Mig will only deal with modernization. The release of new aircraft for the Air Force is not provided. The prospects for the corporation are not very bright.
    1. Eric
      +3
      17 March 2012 13: 33
      Yes, I noticed that too. MIG is a forge of light cars.
  16. +4
    17 March 2012 12: 01
    Air Force before the 2020 year of the 92 front-line bombers Su-34.-and if tomorrow the war then what?
    1. -3
      17 March 2012 13: 16
      Quote: kosmos84
      Air Force before the 2020 year of the 92 front-line bombers Su-34.-and if tomorrow the war then what?

      If local is enough, if with NATO or China then the Strategic Missile Forces
      1. VAF
        VAF
        +4
        17 March 2012 15: 30
        Quote: Kyrgyz
        if with NATO or China then the Strategic Missile Forces


        Have they already finished their Strategic Rocket Forces?

        Or again, as in Khrushchev's vrnmen- ".... with a shoe on the podium and remember Kuzka's mother ???" wassat
      2. 0
        18 March 2012 10: 17
        Kyrgyz,
        That's the trouble that may not be enough! http://warfiles.ru/4295-ssha-sputnikovaya-sistema-protivo-raketnoy-oborony-pro-r
        ossiyskie-yadernye-sily-obnuleny.html
  17. +1
    17 March 2012 12: 53
    Many said: "Putin promises before the elections and nothing will be built after the elections!"
    The elections are over, and the trend towards re-equipping and strengthening the army continues and it pleases drinks
  18. sazhka0
    +3
    17 March 2012 13: 16
    Everything is like at a solemn meeting. Dedicated to something .. Noodles, noodles, noodles. Such melancholy .. I live in Engels. I have windows overlooking the Letka and the runway .. For a long time I have not heard a single strategist .. Even a helicopter from ARZ ONE two weeks "worries". What kind of raid, what kind of combat training ?? For whom does he carry this crap ??? I looked at the previous place of service on google map .. NOT ONE AIRCRAFT .. Well, how can I not say Glory Pu !! 1
    1. VAF
      VAF
      +4
      17 March 2012 14: 04
      Quote: sazhka0
      Everything is like in a solemn meeting dedicated to something .. Noodles, noodles, noodles.


      According to the article, practically yes !!! lol

      Here is a visual illustration for your post and for all the "doubters"! winked

      The best strategist in the world, totally agree! good

      The number of members at the current moment of time? Correct, you all know, we will not compare with amers, I hope (by number) ??? recourse

      But the planned flights, we count and are surprised, but "... hgdezh something else ???" feel

      And the Air Force Commander answers - ".... in the composition and on the list" ?! feel
      1. sazhka0
        +3
        17 March 2012 14: 57
        Here's how they flew around the "corner" and after that there was a feeling that the entire year's supply of kerosene was burned .. They stand and stand .. And somehow no one about this is "driven" ... The service is ongoing, salaries are good. There are no accidents. .And the fact that people are sitting on earth for months, nobody cares .. It's a pity .. All qualifications are down the drain ..
        1. VAF
          VAF
          +2
          17 March 2012 15: 34
          Quote: sazhka0
          there was a feeling that the entire annual supply of kerosene was burned .. They stand and stand .. And somehow no one about this is "driven" ...


          You say almost the truth !!! good

          Only not "they burned the kerosene", but "ate up the clock", and the resource on the engines is not very good and Kuznetsovtsy do not prolong something, but there is a problem with repairs! request
    2. 443190
      +1
      17 March 2012 18: 05
      Respected! You are slightly wrong. There were flights on Thursday. 2- TU-160 took off, 3 TU-95, 1 IL-78 .... Although this is not much, but still fly. Himself looked at it standing on the banks of the Saratovka river.
      1. VAF
        VAF
        +2
        17 March 2012 22: 44
        Quote: 443190
        Respected! You are slightly wrong. There were flights on Thursday. 2- TU-160 took off, 3 TU-95, 1 IL-78 ..


        Out of 12 -2a ?! Out of 24-x-3s? Out-20-1-n ?!
        Abaldet !!! This is the level of combat readiness, is the rest of the regiment in full KBP ready for the tasks?
        Maybe then you don’t have to fly at all, and so on the 1st airplane and normal?
        We flew, so we had up to 20 cars in the planned and this was considered the norm! And 3 full flight changes per week, but it was true before the arrival of Mechny, and then even more so Yolkin !!!
        1. 443190
          +3
          17 March 2012 23: 30
          I agree that a little ... But what to do?
          We in the 30th of one AE drove 8-10 sides. And by 2001, the entire regiment and 10 sides could not raise ... As a result, the extreme fall in Chelyabinsk of our regiment. Here is the result.
          And strategists are still flying. It's true.
          1. VAF
            VAF
            +2
            17 March 2012 23: 52
            Quote: 443190
            And by 2001, the entire regiment and 10 sides could not raise.


            I completely agree !!! It was this and even worse !!!
  19. Dynamite
    +4
    17 March 2012 14: 00
    If for unfulfilled promises in the country they start brutally having up to the resignation of a state official, such articles will be many times less.
    1. VAF
      VAF
      +3
      17 March 2012 15: 35
      Quote: Dynamite
      in the country they will begin to cruelly have up to the resignation of a state official, such articles will be many times less.


      In our country, this is a pipe dream !!!
      Well, they cannot "have" those whom they themselves gave birth to!
      1. 443190
        +2
        17 March 2012 23: 32
        Bees versus honey ??? This is NONSENS !!!
  20. +4
    17 March 2012 15: 42
    About MiG-35, 29K did not even mention ...
    sadly ...
    1. VAF
      VAF
      +3
      17 March 2012 16: 24
      Quote: Torus
      About MiG-35, 29K did not even mention ...


      Everything is simple and old as the world:
      1. How can he "mention" if not even experts have already learned to ask "inconvenient" (correct) questions ?!
      2. And if suddenly a person who understands and knows aviation is confronted, what then does the Air Force Civil Code do?
      Conclusion: A very uncomfortable picture can turn out!
      PS And so there is no question, so there is no problem!
    2. VAF
      VAF
      +4
      17 March 2012 22: 49
      Quote: Torus
      About MiG-35, 29K did not even mention ...


      Climb the forums of pilots, you know how much, I don’t even know what to call the remnants — bases or units, well, in short, and you’ll find out how many Mig-29s we have left in service!
      When you find out, you will cry and you will understand why we, or rather, do not need IM-35!
      There is practically no one to fly on them! Everyone has been "reformed" !! "Uryayayayayaya ... Taburetkin", the inspirer and organizer of super ideas on "the collapse of the Army and Navy"!
      1. 443190
        +1
        17 March 2012 23: 35
        Why are you blaming Taburetkina .... He is just a CONTRACTOR !!! He was given instructions from above and he fulfilled them ...
        1. VAF
          VAF
          +2
          17 March 2012 23: 54
          Quote: 443190
          He is just a CONTRACTOR !!! He was given instructions from above and he fulfilled them ...


          And because ".... lowering" !!! recourse
      2. 0
        19 March 2012 12: 35
        Am I freaking out that Taburetkin started reforms when the country with the army was doing fine? It seems like everything was already ruined.
      3. +1
        April 4 2012 22: 26
        Quote: veteran.air force
        There’s practically nobody to fly on them !!!


        Yeah ... with this attitude, not only will there be soon to fly, but there will be no one to ride, walk and shoot ... belay Only the "national guard" (read - Privatization Guard Corps) will remain.

        And about the MiG - sorry for the good KB. So I’m not hoping for the best, because nothing else remains
  21. +3
    17 March 2012 17: 15
    And what, about the most sought-after aircraft did not say anything - about the Su-25
  22. +1
    17 March 2012 19: 07
    Veteran air force, it is clear that a lot has been learned from perestroika. And the Mig-31 in your photo is a common example of cannibalism, to repair the remaining ones.
    So what, do you have decisive proposals on how to immediately increase the strength of the Air Force (in the amount available to the budget)? Only, pliz, without the usual Russian hysteria like we all hang, and then we'll see.
    Maybe you have a recipe for releasing 10 SU-34 per month? Or at least 5? Or are you ready to contain all 1200 airfields in the conditions of the absence of aircraft? With the current number - just the 1 plane to the airport. Cool, very cool.
    1. VAF
      VAF
      +4
      17 March 2012 20: 14
      Now I will take a walk with the dog, I will return and I will definitely answer if there is interest!
    2. +1
      17 March 2012 20: 19
      Quote: Botanologist
      Maybe you have a recipe for releasing 10 SU-34 per month? Or at least 5? Or are you ready to contain all 1200 airfields in the conditions of the absence of aircraft? With the current number - just the 1 plane to the airport. Cool, very cool.

      FACTORIES TO RESTORE FROM WHICH MADE WAREHOUSES OF VARIOUS COMMERCIES! AND NORMAL ZP TO ASSEMBLERS AND TURNERS AT THESE PLANTS!
      1. 443190
        +5
        17 March 2012 20: 42
        That's the problem right now. No one will give the warehouses kindly. We in Saratov finished off the aircraft factory that produced Yak .... And we turned up the turners and assemblers. Young people are not in a hurry for such industries. We wouldn’t have 10 now, but at least 3-4 Su-34 units a month to produce .... And it would be good.
    3. +3
      17 March 2012 22: 14
      There are effective recipes. To begin with, take Russian companies offshore ...
      1. VAF
        VAF
        +2
        17 March 2012 23: 57
        Quote: gyrfalco
        For starters, take Russian companies offshore ..


        You say the truth, so who will give something !!!
        What kind of reports did Stepashin represent?
        And nothing has changed"! wassat
    4. VAF
      VAF
      +4
      17 March 2012 23: 10
      Quote: Botanologist
      So what, do you have decisive proposals on how to immediately increase the strength of the Air Force (in the amount available to the budget)? Only, pliz, without the usual Russian hysteria like we all hang, and then we'll see.


      Everything came and sat down for an answer, although hanging, as you say, as a warning to others would not hurt. THEIR kinship and nepotism are very prosperous and the son or son-in-law can ask a question, why was it possible for dad or father-in-law, but I can’t ??? request

      And the recipe is very simple, in terms of volume, budget available:
      1. Stop throwing money away (understand cutting) -Skolkovo, ON-ON-Chubik, Summit Bridges, etc. feeding without control Caucasus, etc.
      2. Modernization (in terms of the machine that has already been flying is being modernized) is carried out only at the ARZ, and the production of new ones is carried out at the manufacturers' factories!
      3. Remove by-products such as Super Jet, MS-21 to civilian plants and the freed up opportunities to redirect to the production of main products:
      -Irkut-30s
      -KNAPO-35th
      -NAPO-Su-34
      -Cowls -Mig-35
      -Falcon also instruct the Su-34.
      -Ulan_ude Su-25 and Su39
      4. Reduce export contracts, at least 50/50, and not as we are now 2 and they are 30 !!!
      5 NAPO released 6-7 Su-24s per month (!!!), so what is the problem, or at least up to 5 pieces, to increase the Su-34s production ??
      Well, in short !!
  23. +2
    17 March 2012 22: 26
    Of course, I don’t understand aviation ... but here we have 250 MIG-31 ... there will be 100 pieces .. this is an aircraft capable of shooting down everything that flies, and due to its height and speed it will do it with impunity ... That is, if I don’t understand this plane of gaining superiority in the air ... well then, why do we need other fighters? If after flying it in the air there is nothing left ...
    1. 443190
      +6
      17 March 2012 22: 51
      Mig -31 is a carrier of air combat missiles. A kind of platform for quickly delivering weapons to the desired point. His task is to meet the enemy at a distant frontier and, if possible, try to prevent him from reaching the border of missile launch. Altitude and speed do not make him invulnerable. Gone are the days when it was. In addition to it, fighters are also needed to gain superiority in the air over the battlefield of the MIG-29 type and more powerful SU-27 type to operate in the depths of the enemy’s defense. Hence such a mess. Yes, and a little is 100 pieces ...

      For honesty +

      "I certainly don't understand aviation .." For honesty +
    2. VAF
      VAF
      +6
      18 March 2012 00: 09
      Quote: ward
      Of course, I do not understand aviation ... but here we have 250 MIG-31 ... there will be 100 pieces ..


      To the correctly posed question you get + and the correct answer:

      1. The border of the airspace of the Russian Federation (territorial waters and land is about 40 thousand km.
      2. We take 100 aircraft incredibly, but we take that all 100 are completely ready!
      3. According to Pupkin’s arithmetic, we divide it stupidly correctly, we get the figure of 400 km per 1 plane, but you need at least 10, because.
      -the plane needs to come into the zone and there to barrage, then come back, preparing for the second flight and back.
      Even theoretically with one airplane, such a process of protecting and defending the airspace is impossible !!! Neither tactically nor theoretically!
      And if the goal is not a single, but a group one, and even with a cover (with AUG for example) and not one?
      Well, everything else was explained to you 443190 normally and intelligibly!
      1. 0
        18 March 2012 06: 04
        What a drawless picture you have drawn. Maybe the adversary will not attack from all sides at once on all 40000 km? smile
        1. 443190
          -1
          18 March 2012 21: 05
          As history shows us, when the opportunity arises, they always tried to deprive us ... The very last war of 41-45 ... Germany attacked and Japan and Turkey were waiting in the wings ... Therefore, the troops had to be kept along the entire border line. Times are changing, but only the presence of the army throughout the country can protect us from such villains in accordance with probable threats.
      2. -1
        18 March 2012 06: 23
        a pair of 31s can control 1000 km along the front, + ground air defense radars and so on, a massive raid is a war - there it is already necessary to respond with other weapons, and a massive raid should not go unnoticed, it should not be detected near the border, but long before receiving such a command (for that there should be reconnaissance), now is not 1941, after all ... but if you panic, then about the same USA - which air defense systems have only along the borders of the sea, that is, when this - the air defense itself - in depth - the planes can already act with impunity, I am already silent about Japan, where there is no need to break through air defense in order to strike deep into the "continent" - you can simply act with cruise missiles, Germany and France - separately - are generally elementary targets. ... who else needs to panic! ???
        1. 443190
          +2
          18 March 2012 09: 48
          pardon me. Where did you study the NATO air defense system. Germany and France - elementary goals? Who taught you this? The United States has air defense along the borders .... Well, try to fly to those borders without hindrance. Here Japan is probably unlucky in this regard ... It is too close to us.
  24. +4
    17 March 2012 23: 03
    Ward, for the modern air force, and for fighter aircraft in particular, planes of different types are needed. The MiG-31 is a large and expensive airship .... But in general, according to the article, I subscribe to all the words of the Veteran. Aviation, like no one else, has suffered over the years of ongoing "modernizations" and "optimizations". For the whole vast country, there is one flight school ... in a nightmare this could not have been dreamed of.
  25. +4
    17 March 2012 23: 33
    Quote: veteran.air force
    And the recipe is very simple, in terms of volume, budget available: 1. Stop throwing money away (understand cutting) -Skolkovo, NA-ON-Chubik, Bridges for the Summit, etc. feeding without a control Caucasus, etc. 2. Modernization (in terms of the machine that has already been flying is being modernized) should be carried out only at the ARZ, and the release of modernized new ones should be carried out at the manufacturers' plants! 3. Remove by-products such as Super Jet, MS-21 to civilian plants and the freed up opportunities to redirect to the production of the main products: -Irkut-30-e-KNAPO-35-e-NAPO-Su-34-Lukhovitsy -Mig-35-Sokolu also instruct Su-34.-Ulan_ude Su-25 and Su394. Reduce export contracts, at least 50/50, and not as we are now 2 and they are 30 !!! 5 NAPO issued per month (!!!) 6-7 Su-24s, so what is the problem as well, or at least up to 5 pieces to increase the production of Su-34s ?? Well, in short !!


    With two hands - for! This is a necessary minimum, not even for restoration - in order to maintain the potential of aviation, may those who hold the voice of the people hear the power! Time, time .....
  26. sazhka0
    +6
    18 March 2012 05: 08
    Well, that's why I, as a fitter, an assembler of aircraft, have to make furniture ..? And I will tryndyat .. we will do it .. Who will do it for you? First, teach HOW IT IS DONE .. Learn to "do" the plane. But he is NOT .. In other matters, the same as the TEACHERS .. For a person to begin to understand why he makes a hole in this particular place, it takes SO MUCH time .. Be sure to swallow dust
    1. +1
      18 March 2012 06: 11
      Absolutely to the point! Literate people squandered, and the elderly left themselves. Now graduates prof. colleges collect planes and helicopters without tutors. And the aircraft are falling due to the KPS. And the veteran air force offers planes to pack a pack a month, and this is not the Yak-1 ...
      1. sazhka0
        +4
        18 March 2012 06: 39
        I know .. But the veteran is RIGHT .. By the way, I have a "tattoo" "Made in the Air Force" .. I have been dealing with airplanes for 13 years .. And now 50
      2. +2
        18 March 2012 09: 19
        almost demobilization,
        Correctly offers - there is little technology, and it has a crashed resource. The park needs to be restored urgently, and not by 2020, and not by single sides, which were abandoned by foreign partners ... In support of:
        1. I hope you will not dispute the assertion that in modern warfare the side that controls the sky wins the earth. The summer of 1941 taught nothing, we are stepping on that rake ... The experience of the last local wars is even more evident - a significant part of the military equipment was damaged in the places of deployment, they did not even have time to get it out of the hangars ... this despite the fact that the attacking side often did not even enter the air defense coverage area.
        2. Undoubtedly, the situation with personnel is complicated, the continuity of generations is interrupted - but this is not a reason to go with the flow of arms. It is necessary to restore specialized educational institutions, to attract old cadres - I am sure there is still gunpowder in the flocks.
        1. +2
          18 March 2012 13: 45
          Of course I will not dispute, this is clear even to the dreadlock and he will approve! smile Those who have air supremacy will win sooner or later with minimal losses.
          The heads of enterprises with a nod to old hard workers must go, among them there are still strong, not completely sleeping men, maybe they would agree to work for the good of the Motherland?
          1. +1
            18 March 2012 16: 55
            Quote: sazhka0
            Well, that’s why I, as a mechanic, an aircraft assembler is forced to make furniture ..? And I’ll trynd ... we will do it .. Who will do it to you?
            Yes, the answer to the question already exists, we look above ... Our man is resentful to the insult, would the will be at the top to repent: they say, excuse me, men, we chopped wood ... Of course, everything is not so simple and good, twice in one hard to enter the river
      3. +2
        18 March 2012 18: 41
        Quote: almost demobilized
        and the old people left themselves

        Old people themselves do not leave. They are not very comfortable living on one pension. Moreover, they are not trying very hard to pass on their experience to the younger generation. Hold on to a place. In factories, the main backbone is pensioners and those who are close to this title. Young people are not willing to go to low salaries. Maybe I'm wrong, but my experience shows the same picture regardless of the organization, whether it is a state or joint-stock company.
        1. +1
          18 March 2012 20: 39
          Over the past two three years, Russia has built a fairly large number of factories for the assembly of foreign cars. For all these factories, workers were found, workers with normal skills. Need a will. And when nothing is dripping onto a personal account, then some leaders have no will. And if there is a will, you can collect five and ten Su-34s. Take an interest in the experience of the Second World War. And another fly in the ointment http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spzUtZPvOdg&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jX86Ug7YRIo. And so as not to be sad at all, you can see this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hEG2HFO1WAQ&feature=related
  27. 443190
    +3
    18 March 2012 21: 00
    During the Second World War, the director of the plant for not fulfilling the plan was consumed .... The responsibility of the manager for the tasks should be and not impunity. Then it will be.