Military Review

Chemical fake in Idlib

41
Materials of an independent journalistic investigation into the falsification of the “chemical attack” allegedly carried out aviation Syrian government forces in the city of Khan Sheikhun in the province of Idlib, which served as the occasion for the American attack by cruise missiles at the Al-Shairat air base in the province of Homs.


7 April from 3.42 to 3.56 Moscow time from the waters of the Mediterranean Sea near the island of Crete from two destroyers of the US Navy (Ross and Porter) was hit with a massive 59 missile with Tohmakhk cruise missiles at the Syrian air base Ashe Shayrat in Homs province.

Chemical fake in Idlib


The reason for this act of aggression, grossly violating international law, was the fact that, according to Washington, from this 4 air base on April 2017, Syrian aviation allegedly attacked chemical munitions in the city of Khan-Sheikhoun, which killed about 100 civilians, and also 400 injured.

For reference: the city of Khan Sheikhun is located in 55 km south of Idlib - the capital of the same province of the Syrian Arab Republic. This territory is under the control of the Dzhebhat al-Nusra terrorist group since 2014.

CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS

After 8.00 in the morning of April 4, freelance journalist Muazz al-Shami and Abdullah al-Ghani, who are in Idlib, provided the media resources of the Syrian opposition and Al-Jazeera TV channels with the participation of the so-called "White Helmets" - Civil Defense "video clips on the" consequences of the so-called air strikes using chemical weapons»On the outskirts of the city of Khan-Sheykhun, Idlib province. At the same time, Muazz al-Shami in his story specifically called gas "Zarin."

For reference: “White Helmets” is an organization that has repeatedly discredited its connection with the terrorist organizations “Jebhad al-Nusra”, “Al-Qaeda”, whose real activity is the production of staged photo-video materials to discredit the Syrian government, the Syrian army and the Russian Aerospace Forces.





On 10.00 in the morning, the National Coalition of Opposition and Revolutionary Forces of Syria (NKORS) issued a statement that more than 54 people died and at least 80 suffered as a result of the so-called “chemical attack” by the Syrian government forces. Most of the victims were evacuated to Turkey, to medical institutions of Gaziantep.

At the same time, information on the use of "chemical weapons" by the Syrian army in the Khan-Sheikhun region began to spread rapidly in foreign media and social networks.

One of the first about the alleged "chemical attack" in 9.50 (Moscow time) was reported by the opposition website "Jobar News", which accused government forces of using sarin and reported on 40 victims.



In 10.41 (MSK), the so-called Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (UK) spread information on its website about the use of chemical weapons in the province of Idlib (Syria) on the Russian Federation’s web site, reporting the death of 58 people.



In 11.08 (Moscow time), the Reuters news agency posted similar information material, citing data from the Syrian Observatory on Human Rights.



At 12.30 (Moscow time) news Al-Masdar News (Lebanon) reported that the Syrian Arab army in Khan Sheikhun, Idlib province, had destroyed a militant chemical weapons factory.



In 16.30 (Moscow time), Al-Masdar News questioned the fact that residents were poisoned with sarin. In favor of their doubts, the agency gave an example of the fact that on video and photographic materials devoted to the incident in Khan-Sheikhun, representatives of the White Helmets, who do not have reliable remedies, provide assistance to the victims. At the same time, there is a suspicion of too calm behavior of representatives of this organization in emergency situations, which creates an impression of the staged nature of the material presented.



Follow-up reaction in Western media

The Western media reacted sharply to reports of alleged himatak in Khan-Sheikhun.

In 15.00 4 April, Paris took the initiative to convene an emergency meeting of the UN Security Council on this issue.

This was followed by a statement by the UN special envoy for Syria, Staffan de Mistura: “What happened this morning, we discussed this with F.Mogherini, terribly. We demand, and the UN will require, and I am sure that there will be a meeting of the UN Security Council on this issue, to determine responsibility. ” Then followed statements of the Foreign Ministry of Turkey, Germany, Canada, USA, France, Great Britain, NATO Secretary General condemning the so-called “Syrian himataku”. At the same time, Russia and China advocated that the investigation into the use of chemical weapons in Syria be objective and fair.

At a meeting of the UN Security Council, US Representative N. Haley accused the Syrian government of the so-called "chemical attack."



THE DEVELOPMENT OF MYTHS

What was it really?


Our experts, with the involvement of independent experts, thoroughly analyzed materials from the scene of the tragedy that were replicated by foreign media, which were used to justify American aggression, and we declare with all the responsibility: NO "CHEMICAL ATTACK" WAS NOT.

ARGUMENTATION

Consider the first argument.


The charges used the argument of the use of Syrian aviation munitions containing toxic substances. For which were given videos showing the fact of a chemical attack.





The type of ammunition shown in the video does not apply to aviation weapons and, moreover, does not apply to chemical weapons. On it there is no tail plumage and any marking. Most likely, this is a handicraft mine or some kind of metal product that is not at all related to ammunition.

Immediately the question arises, why should government forces use chemical ammunition manufactured in an artisanal way, which may not work or lead to the defeat of those who use them?

In addition, on all materials from different angles, only one small funnel is demonstrated, which can in no way be considered a consequence of an air strike.

Consider the second argument.







In many frames, we are trying to demonstrate the primary sign of exposure to organophosphorus toxic agents, namely miosis or constriction of the pupils. However, it is so unfortunate that, on the contrary, in the frames we see highly dilated pupils - mydriasis - practically in the entire iris of the eye. Such an effect can cause poisoning with narcotic or psychotropic drugs.

This version, by the way, was confirmed by Swedish experts from the organization “Swedish doctors for human rights”, who believe that the children shown in the videos were unconscious under the influence of psychotropic substances introduced by him (the statement “Swedish doctors for human rights” about distortions in the article Veterans Today regarding “White Helmets” from 8 in April (2017).)

Consider the third argument.





On the frames, there are no signs of lesion characteristic of mild and moderate degrees of severity, such as excessive salivation, lacrimation, and discharge of aqueous humor from the nose.

In the video, directors attempted to demonstrate nasal discharge, but such a weak degree had nothing to do with sarin.

Consider the fourth argument.



From the presented video materials it is clear that we want to demonstrate severe poisoning, since with mild and moderate degrees of damage a person is conscious and able to sit on his own, move around and perform other conscious actions. However, severe lesions are characterized by vomiting, urine and sewage, severe cramps, turning into paralysis. On the presented frames these symptoms are absent.

Consider the fifth argument.





Vaporous sarin is easily sorbed by porous materials: fabrics, wool, wood, brick, concrete. Also, this poisonous substance is absorbed into the painted surfaces and rubber products, which creates a danger of injury to a person who has emerged from the contaminated atmosphere, as well as people who are near him and, all the more, in contact with the affected.

Please note that the injured are assisted without the use of personal protective equipment such as gloves and gas masks.

The presence of only respirators on people's faces indicates a lack of knowledge in the field of military chemistry among the directors of this production. Sarin vapors work very well not only through the nasopharynx, but also through the mucous eyes. Therefore, if any poisonous substance were really applied, and after that, a person without protective equipment would contact contaminated surfaces - whether it be fabrics, wood, clothing, and the like, he would definitely get defeated. We see healthy, energetic and vigorous so-called "rescuers".



At the same time, it raises the question of what a person does in personnel in a high-quality gas mask, who oversees the provision of assistance to the victims, but does not take part in the work, only telling the operator who to shoot and where. Who is he and why others do not have such gas masks?

Consider the sixth argument.



In the 11: 00 area, videos were taken that were taken in the same place from different cameras, in which those who were injured were washed and taken away in an unknown direction. Judging by the elongated shadows, the video was shot no later than 9: 30-10: 00 - that is, a few hours before the time of the strike of the Syrian aviation.







In 11: 30-12: 30 (judging by the almost complete absence of shadows) - a video is filmed in the territory of the militant camp to the east of Khan-Sheikhun, in which a series of air strikes are allegedly inflicted on the base. There are no victims of alleged himataki on the video. However, the frame shows several dead bodies.

A reasonable question arises: where did all the victims of the "chemical attack" go?

Consider the seventh argument.


There are practically no women among the victims of the attack. The bulk of the victims are men and children, and women are only among the dead. If we assume that the video materials were fabricated, we can assume that the absence of women is due to the fact that, according to Muslim tradition, a man has no right to touch other women.



The body of a woman. She is dressed, despite the fact that many other victims undress. Nobody touches her.



Injured men. They are stripped, washed, turned over.

Consider the actions of the so-called "rescuers" from the "White Helmets".

We have repeatedly said that “White Helmets” is a biased organization that has established itself as the creators of stage documentary films with elements of fiction, as well as associated with terrorists.

In favor of the fact that once again we are dealing with a cheap production, they are told by other facts, besides those mentioned earlier.



The shots of the “rescuers” actions look extremely unprofessional: some people randomly pour water on the victims, allegedly washing away chemicals from them, others immediately give them artificial respiration.





In the video you can see how the representative of the "White Helmets" roughly grabs the injured child and for some reason runs with him towards the wasteland. At the same time, in a hastily cropped frame you can see how it slows down after the scene with his participation was filmed.



It also raises questions and why “rescuers” so diligently and artistically spread the bodies of injured children and adults in front of cameras instead of providing them with medical assistance as soon as possible?



In addition, the photo shows two people in white suits of chemical protection, who are assisted in the defeat of toxic substances.



In the future, these same people appear in the background appear quite healthy.

WHEN WAS THE USA ADMINISTRATED DECISION ON THE ATTACK BY THE WINGED ROCKETS OF THE “AL-SHAYRAT” FLIGHT?

Missile strike on Aer. Shairat



The destroyer missile defense "Porter" of the US Navy has been in military service in the Mediterranean and Black Seas since November 2016. The onboard equipment of the ship allows you to store an array of data of targets throughout the entire area of ​​its combat service and prepare flight missions for Tomahawk cruise missiles directly on the destroyer.

The missile defense missile system Ross, which 3 on April 2017 of the year left its permanent base of the Rota naval base (Spain) and with a maximum speed in 72 hours, together with the destroyer Porter, arrived in a predetermined missile launch area in the eastern parts of the Mediterranean.

It should be noted that 3 of April of this year, when the destroyer “Ross” set off for a combat mission in the prescribed course, no attacks by Syrian aviation against terrorist targets in the village of Khan-Sheikhun had yet occurred.

Such a maneuver by the US Navy ships indicates a well-planned rocket attack on Syrian government military targets.

In order to create a motive for three months in the opposition Syrian and Western media, government forces were accused of using chemical weapons against militants and civilians. 4 April 2017 was held in Khan-Sheihun 18 re-enactment of a chemical attack by the Syrian Air Force aircraft on the inhabitants of the city.

Since the time of readiness for the launch of cruise missiles from destroyers of the US Navy is up to 8 hours, after the information campaign held in Khan-Sheikhun, the fate of the Al-Sheyrat airbase was predetermined.

CONCLUSION

All these facts convincingly prove that the decision on a massive missile attack on Syria was made in Washington long before the fabricated 4 events of April 2017 in Khan-Sheikhun, and shooting from the so-called “place of event” is directed by falsification, which has the goal of creating an informational reason for attack cruise missiles and justify US aggression against independent Syria.
Originator:
http://www.segodnia.ru/content/186710
41 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Razvedka_Boem
    Razvedka_Boem April 14 2017 05: 40
    +3
    It must be translated and distributed on English-language resources.
    1. siberalt
      siberalt April 14 2017 06: 31
      +5
      This is just a small part of the screenshots. By the way, they quickly disperse on the Internet. There are, for example, those where they carry the corpse of the same little girl in their arms. At the same time, they change his clothes twice, but they forgot to change their hairstyle or remove noticeable cuts. Then the same girl was shown alive, lying on a hospital bed. In general, there are so many mistakes that Trump fit to shoot himself.
      1. Olgovich
        Olgovich April 14 2017 06: 46
        +1
        Quote: siberalt
        In general, there are so many mistakes that Trump fit to shoot himself.


        Alas, they will repeat about the involvement of Russia and the terrible animal Assad ....
        1. Orel
          Orel April 14 2017 07: 33
          +1
          Quote: Olgovich
          Alas, they will repeat about the involvement of Russia and the terrible animal Assad ....


          Our version also seems extremely unconvincing to me - we’ve got into a chemical weapons warehouse ... We and Assad have been attacking warehouses and everything else for almost 2 years now. During this time, thousands of warehouses were destroyed and never once did anyone get into chemical weapons stores ??? Extremely doubtful and extremely unlikely. How not to treat Assad, but in 2016 there was a UN investigation and Assad was found guilty of several chemical attacks, as well as some terrorist groups. So they are all "animals" there. For me, so enclose a fence and let them build their "caliphate." All who want to go there are sent there. Even let the state pay for the tickets. Then piss off. Only without the right to return.
          1. Azim77
            Azim77 April 14 2017 08: 38
            +1
            About the warehouse was one of the first versions, assumptions. In order not to be accused of silence. But then, as always happens after a more detailed study of the situation, a fresh version came out that a deliberate provocation was carried out, a fake of a chemical attack.
          2. Diana Ilyina
            Diana Ilyina April 14 2017 11: 36
            15
            Orel Today, 07:33 ↑
            How to not treat Assad, but in 2016 there was a UN investigation and Assad was found guilty of several chemical attacks
            UN investigation ...?! laughing Then refer immediately to the investigation of the State Department, the result will be the same ...! negative
            as well as some terrorist groups
            Which ones?! Give at least one UN resolution that would condemn the actions of terrorists in Syria. request
            So they are all "animals" there.
            And as I understand it, superman ?! negative
            Then piss off. Only without the right to return.
            Or maybe you can get a ticket there with a free visa, you will see enlightenment in the brain ... fool
            1. Orel
              Orel April 14 2017 12: 24
              0
              UN investigation ...?! laughing Link then immediately to the State Department investigation, the result will be the same ...


              2016 year.

              According to the report of the UN and OPCW investigation of the poisonous attacks during the conflict in Syria, on March 16, 2015, it was the pro-government forces that launched a gas attack in Idlib province.

              As TASS recalls, the joint UN-OPCW mechanism for the investigation of chemical attacks (SMR) began work in Syria on March 1. For several months, experts studied nine confirmed cases of the use of toxic substances. In two attacks, the Syrian Air Force was found guilty; in one attack, ISIS terrorists recognized guilt. In the remaining six cases, the blame could not be established.

              And who else do you need ??? This is the UN Commission and the OPCW. There can be no other arbitrators or do you have others?

              Quote: Diana Ilyina
              Which ones?! Give at least one UN resolution that would condemn the actions of terrorists in Syria.


              2015 year.

              The UN Security Council approved a draft resolution condemning the use of chemical weapons, in particular chlorine, in Syria.

              "The UN Security Council reiterates that the use of chemical weapons is a serious violation of international law, and again calls for bringing to justice those responsible for any use of chemical weapons," the document says.

              The resolution was supported by 14 countries, including Russia.

              The representative of Venezuela abstained from the vote.

              Quote: Diana Ilyina
              Or maybe you can get a ticket there with a free visa, you will see enlightenment in the brain ...


              Or maybe you should go there or at least read what is really going on there? Judging by your "comments" you don’t know anything at all.
              1. Ulan
                Ulan April 14 2017 19: 20
                +1
                And the fact that the OPCW has OFFICIALLY registered 52 cases of the use of OM by ISIS terrorists and other bandits? Is it past the cash register? Not interested?
                And this is clear evidence that the terrorists have THAT!
                And the fact that the OPCW, along with other international and governmental organizations, including from the United States participated in the destruction of Syrian chemical weapons and officially confirmed that they were completely removed and destroyed from the territory controlled by the Syrian government, is this also not of interest?
                Or maybe Assad bought all these organizations and they left him some chemical weapons?
                Otherwise, where could it come from, if both the OM and their plants were destroyed?
                So you are more careful about the "animals", firstly, they may require evidence, and secondly, they can advise you to look in the mirror.
          3. Orionvit
            Orionvit April 14 2017 20: 10
            0
            Fence for me like that and let them build their "caliphate"
            Will you build a fence?
  2. Victor jnnjdfy
    Victor jnnjdfy April 14 2017 05: 43
    +4
    None of the parties to the conflict in Syria has any particular sympathy for me. It is clear that everyone is trying to blame each other for all mortal sins. I would like the side that we support to adhere to some rules or our requirements in the conduct of hostilities. Then it will be easier for us. And, it is desirable that all sorts of Konashenkov carry less nonsense about the loss of 36 American CRs out of 59 when they lost a strike on a Syrian air base.
    1. rvRomanoff
      rvRomanoff April 14 2017 06: 56
      +5
      Insulting the official representative of the Russian Ministry of Defense, you insult Russia. "Don't you dare insult Russia. Look into my eyes."
      1. Nikolay K
        Nikolay K April 14 2017 08: 05
        +3
        Do not dare to insult Russia. Look into my eyes

        Your quote mix is ​​inappropriate. Unfortunately, our representative at the UN at the time of uttering these words clearly demonstrated his lack of professionalism. Diplomat
        it is not worth losing your temper and losing your temper. A professional will be able to respond firmly without the use of gangster speech turns.
        1. Azim77
          Azim77 April 14 2017 08: 43
          +7
          On the contrary, given that Safronkov is a temporary representative, they took advantage of this skillfully and out of place. The diplomat you are talking about will come later.
          In general, there is a very tough struggle of interests. Even the Chinese representative did not restrain himself and said to the same representative of Great Britain that he spoils the air in the room all the time with his insulting speeches.
          1. Nikolay K
            Nikolay K April 14 2017 10: 34
            +2
            It is clear that he will no longer become temporary and permanent after this. The problem is not even what specifically said. He lost control, and the diplomat should always keep his head cold.
            1. Razvedka_Boem
              Razvedka_Boem April 14 2017 11: 07
              +5
              He lost control

              He was allowed to "lose" self-control. To get better.
              1. Ulan
                Ulan April 14 2017 19: 27
                +1
                And it seems to have come down as to Pasha Emilievich, who understood ... "that now they will beat him and maybe even kick him."
                It’s a joke, of course, but these gentlemen are completely insane and think that any meanness can be expressed against Russia.
                They don’t understand another language, there are no diplomats in the West for a long time. Shusher, they have no other name. Impudent, hamovataya, illiterate, lying shushera.
        2. evgesha
          evgesha April 14 2017 10: 23
          +1
          Are you a diplomat?
  3. Monster_Fat
    Monster_Fat April 14 2017 06: 43
    +1
    The author may be missing something. At the beginning (at least in our media) there was a message that the Syrian aviation had struck a chemical weapons factory. And then the rest of the messages went. The fact that there was no chemical attack is a fact. But why the hell did they bomb the plant — couldn’t they calculate the consequences? Barmalei deftly fussed and turned the situation in their direction. Now it will be difficult to prove the opposite.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. CONTROL
      CONTROL April 14 2017 12: 23
      0
      Quote: Monster_Fat
      At the beginning (at least in our media) there was a message that the Syrian aviation had struck a chemical weapons factory. And then the rest of the messages went. The fact that there was no chemical attack is a fact. But why the hell did they bomb the plant — couldn’t they calculate the consequences ?.

      Zarin is not moonshine; you cannot “cook” it at a “home-made” factory! You can’t even make home-made ammunition - it is necessary to achieve atomization to an aerosol state. It evaporates in the same way as water - not too willingly; it smells of apples (didn’t have to smell in a gas tent?). So - about the "self-made" - you can forget, due to inefficiency ...
      1. Monster_Fat
        Monster_Fat April 14 2017 13: 29
        0
        Well, they say about “sarin” only because it’s kind of a “scary” word, like waving a red rag in the face of “enlightened humanity”. Well, sarin is a well-known OM, after the attack on the Tokyo subway. If there was sarin there, as it is right here, the article writes, the half-naked White Helmets volunteers would run there, yeah.
        1. CONTROL
          CONTROL April 14 2017 15: 12
          0
          Quote: Monster_Fat
          Well, they say about “sarin” only because it’s kind of a “scary” word, like waving a red rag in the face of “enlightened humanity”. Well, sarin is a well-known OM, after the attack on the Tokyo subway. If there was sarin there, as it is right here, the article writes, the half-naked White Helmets volunteers would run there, yeah.

          There generally nothing did not have! Even with some kind of “fake” OM, it’s so half-naked! - do not run! and you’re not grabbing anything with your bare hands ...
          1. Monster_Fat
            Monster_Fat April 14 2017 17: 35
            0
            Horseradish knows what was there, but it was not in vain that I wrote in the first post that at the beginning, OURS reported that the Syrian Air Force bombed a plant for the production of airborne weapons. Why did they report this? After all, there was a reason if our Defense Ministry issued this message. If there was just chlorine, then you can run naked and he acts only on the respiratory ...
      2. evgesha
        evgesha April 14 2017 16: 20
        0
        has the smell of apples

        Zarin is an organophosphorus poisonous substance of nerve agent.
        It is methylphosphonic acid fluoride isopropyl ester, liquid without color and odor;
    3. Ulan
      Ulan April 14 2017 19: 28
      0
      This post was just a version, not a proven fact.
      There was a blow, it is not denied, and that the bomb could have landed in a warehouse with OM, this is just a version.
  4. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 April 14 2017 07: 17
    +2
    There is no doubt that this is a fake. But he played his black part and untied the hands of the Americans. And the "white helmets" just need to cover with a blow - the same terrorists and their accomplices.
    1. Ulan
      Ulan April 14 2017 19: 29
      0
      It would be very nice to blame everything on the terrorists.
  5. evgesha
    evgesha April 14 2017 10: 22
    +2
    who would doubt it? and white helmets were invented as propaganda material in "glorious" Israel
    1. rotmistr60
      rotmistr60 April 14 2017 11: 17
      +3
      Well no. Feet grow from London (MI-6).
  6. Operator
    Operator April 14 2017 12: 49
    +1
    In Syria, the situation is very difficult - in 2013-2014, the OPCW liquidated only 10 chemical weapons production and storage facilities located in the territory controlled by the Syrian government. Two facilities located in territory controlled by terrorists were not liquidated.

    The situation is somewhat facilitated by the fact that these non-liquidated facilities contained relatively simple toxic substances such as chlorine and mustard gas (unlike sarin and VX eliminated by the OPCW).

    As a result, terrorists based in Syria are the only ones who now have poisonous substances in their arsenal and use them from time to time, including for provocative purposes.

    The OPCW, which received the 2013 Nobel Peace Prize for the “elimination” of Syrian chemical weapons, only moos and does not calve.
  7. Monster_Fat
    Monster_Fat April 14 2017 12: 59
    0
    Here is another version: http://warfiles.ru/show-149420-v-himatake-v-sirii
    -obnaruzhen-saudovsko-izrailskiy-sled.html

    But what, quite entitled to life and showing the true organizers and those interested in the bloody massacre in Syria ... and, as always, the Jews, no matter how " winked .
  8. MAGRIB
    MAGRIB April 14 2017 13: 07
    0
    Assad burn in Hell!
    1. Ulan
      Ulan April 14 2017 19: 32
      0
      Everything can be, but next to the Saudis, Obama, Trump, Clintonich, and others who encouraged them.
      And certainly with all who are fighting in the ranks of ISIS and other anusr. Moreover, wrapped in pork skins.
    2. Starik72
      Starik72 April 15 2017 00: 07
      0
      MAGRIB. And you too burn in hell!
  9. BAI
    BAI April 14 2017 14: 24
    +1
    The most interesting thing here is the rocket route. If nothing could have been agreed with Lebanon, then such a number would not work with Israel. Moreover, rockets entered Israeli territory near Ben Gurion Airport, where there are a lot of civilian aircraft, and the military constantly flies near their bases. Those. the strike was clearly planned in advance.
  10. Earnest
    Earnest April 14 2017 18: 01
    0
    Quote: CONTROL
    Zarin is not moonshine; you cannot “cook” it at a “home-made” factory! You can’t even make home-made ammunition - it is necessary to achieve atomization to an aerosol state. It evaporates in the same way as water - not too willingly; it smells of apples (didn’t have to smell in a gas tent?). So - about the "self-made" - you can forget, due to inefficiency ...

    Dear CONTROL, do not climb with the amateurish desire to "talk" where knowledgeable people can laugh. Zarin is just “moonshine”, you can make it in the barn, from which I won’t write, it’s all too simple, by the way, the chloropicrin that you “sniffed” in the tent is also one of the options for raw materials. Just like sarin, skillful people can easily make phosgene, you can “weld” a good attack within 3 days.
    1. CONTROL
      CONTROL April 17 2017 07: 25
      0
      Quote: Earnest
      Quote: CONTROL
      Zarin is not moonshine; you cannot “cook” it at a “home-made” factory! You can’t even make home-made ammunition - it is necessary to achieve atomization to an aerosol state. It evaporates in the same way as water - not too willingly; it smells of apples (didn’t have to smell in a gas tent?). So - about the "self-made" - you can forget, due to inefficiency ...

      Dear CONTROL, do not climb with the amateurish desire to "talk" where knowledgeable people can laugh. Zarin is just "moonshine", you can make it in the barn,

      Sarin made "in the barn" is a thick, low-flowing liquid of brown (chocolate, dark brown, etc.) color, practically - turn it into an aerosol to create chemical warheads, alas ... unless - to catch the "enemy" and smear it with it. .. It is - skin, contact penetration ...
      “Combat” sarin - a liquid slightly thicker than water, colorless or yellowish, well - slightly so ... It evaporates slightly, but it is much easier to prepare an aerosol from it than from “chocolate”.
      ------------------
      And you can do everything "in the barn" - and gunpowder, and dynamite, and pyroxylin .... only they do not explode something ... Phosgene - yes, easy; but - as a chemical warfare agent it is ineffective: a lot of it is needed, it quickly loses activity, it is suitable only for terrorist attacks - in the subway, in a store, in a cinema ...
      ---------
      Did you really use them? or at least - faced in a combat situation? Or so - "in theory"? ...
    2. CONTROL
      CONTROL April 17 2017 07: 32
      0
      Not yet retired?
      ... I feel sorry for our army!
  11. Orionvit
    Orionvit April 14 2017 20: 19
    0
    Quote: Monster_Fat
    Fuck knows what was there

    I will say what was there. The incident is an information war, and in a war, as they say, all means are good. As for the Western media, it’s like with the Ukrainian ones. You listen to the news, then you turn it 180 degrees, and only then it seems like the truth. In a word, not a bit of truth, everywhere there is only one lie, not even necessarily in relation to Russia or Assad. In relation to everything.
  12. Vladimir Mamkin
    Vladimir Mamkin April 18 2017 02: 50
    +1
    It is necessary to experience the real sarin on White helmets instantly fly out of Syria if they have time, arrogance and fakes immediately disappear with them.