Whirlwind on the streets of Budapest. Sixty Years of Hungarian Events 1956 of the Year

36
4 November 1956 of the year, sixty years ago, the Soviet Army launched Operation Whirlwind, which resulted in the suppression of anti-Soviet demonstrations in the Hungarian People's Republic. The order of the Commander-in-Chief of the United Armed Forces of the Warsaw Pact countries, which was brought to the attention of the personnel immediately before entering the territory of Hungary, said: “Reaction and counterrevolutionary forces revolted in order to destroy the people's democratic system, eliminate the revolutionary gains of the working people and restore the old landowner-capitalist order ".

Whirlwind on the streets of Budapest. Sixty Years of Hungarian Events 1956 of the Year
- Matthias Rakosi



The ground for exacerbating the situation in Hungary matured for a long time. Back in June, 1953, the Soviet leadership criticized the policy of Matthias Rakosi, the secretary general of the Hungarian Workers' Party, who in Eastern Europe was nicknamed "Stalin's best student." Rakosi was dismissed from the post of head of the Hungarian government, but he retained leadership of the party. Imre Nagy was appointed to the post of the head of the government - an old Marxist with pre-war experience who had lived in the USSR for a long time and was known as a supporter of a more democratic model of the political and economic structure of Hungary. Imre Nagy, becoming the head of the government, embarked on the implementation of a whole range of measures that caused many questions from both Rakosi, who continued to lead the party, and the Soviet leadership. In particular, Imre Nagy stopped the construction of large industrial facilities, banned the eviction of large cities on a socially-class basis, and conducted an amnesty for prisoners. The rejection of the policy of industrialization and cooperation in agriculture could not be positively perceived in the USSR.

In the end, 18 August 1955, Nagy (pictured) was removed from his post as prime minister and expelled from the party, and the government was headed by thirty-three-year-old Andras Hegedyush - a young politician who does not enjoy serious influence in party circles. In fact, the control over the country's leadership was still in the hands of Stalinist Matthias Rakosi and his colleague Ernö Gerё. This caused quite tangible discontent in Hungarian society. In the end, the Soviet leadership, not only from the desire to minimize protest moods in Hungary, but also because of their own questions to Rákosi, succeeded in removing him in July 1956 from the post of first secretary of the Central Committee of the Hungarian Workers Party. However, instead of Rakosi, the party was headed by his closest associate, Ernö Gerё, one of the oldest Hungarian Communists, a member of the Hungarian Soviet Republic 1919 of the year and the Spanish Civil War. Hopefully, such a “bison” as Geryo will pursue a policy of democratization of the country, for obvious reasons, was not necessary. In the party environment and in society as a whole, fermentation began, initiated by opponents of the “Stalinist” line of Rakosi-Gerё. The example of neighboring Poland, where the famous Poznan uprising took place in 1956, had a certain influence on the mood in Hungary.

Mass street performances in Budapest began on October 23 1956. Until now, these events are most often viewed in the “black and white” spectrum - some accuse the initiators of the uprising in pro-Western sentiments and the desire to return the capitalist order in Hungary, others see the popular uprising of October-November 1956 of the year exclusively anti-Soviet and anti-communist. In any case, the victims of the uprising were, first of all, the Communists, the workers of the party and state apparatus. Although the Hungarian rebels positioned themselves as supporters of the “workers' councils”, pro-Western and anti-communist slogans were no exception.

On the night of October 23 1956, the Hungarian Communist Party decided to appoint Imre Nagy as head of the government of the republic. This decision was made with the consent of the Soviet leadership, as Anastas Mikoyan and Mikhail Suslov who arrived in Budapest simply had no choice but to accept the appointment of Imre Nagy. So expelled from the party and removed from all posts Imre Nagy again returned to the Hungarian "big politics".

One of the most interesting personnel decisions made by Imre Nagy was the appointment of the famous philosopher Gyorgy Lukács to the post of the Minister of Culture of Hungary (in the photo). About this person should be said. György Bernat Lukács is considered one of the classics of the Western Marxist tradition. Coming from a wealthy Jewish family, Lukács, whose real name was Levinger, in his youth at the beginning of the twentieth century, became acquainted with Marxist and anarcho-syndicalist ideas. At the same time, Lukács remained a man from the academic environment, although during the short-term existence of the Hungarian Soviet Republic in 1919, he held the post of Acting President. Commissioner of Education. In 1929 — 1945, Lukács lived in Moscow and, surprisingly, despite his views, which were doubtful from the point of view of official Soviet Marxism, was not repressed, but had the opportunity to continue scientific activities. In 1945, Lukács returned to Hungary, where he was also not harassed, and in 1949 he was even included in the Academy of Sciences. At the same time, although Lukács was criticized by the adherents of official Soviet Marxism, but even Mikoyan and Suslov agreed that in difficult conditions of the 1956 fall, Lukács, despite his seventy-year age, was the most acceptable candidate for the post of Minister of Culture than others reviewed by scientists and public figures.

At the most important post in any government, Defense Minister Imre Nagy appointed Colonel Pal Maleter (pictured), who previously commanded the engineering forces of the Hungarian People’s Army. Pal Maleter before the events of 1956, was not known to the general public - he just turned out to be the only senior officer of the Hungarian People’s Army who openly sided with the uprising.

October 27 Ernö Gerö was removed from his post as first secretary of the Central Committee of the Hungarian Workers' Party. He was replaced by Janos Kadar, another pro-Soviet politician. However, this could not turn the course of events back. Imre Nagy, who headed the country's government by this time, found himself in a difficult situation. He could either suppress the uprising, turning to the Soviet Union for help, or try to lead it and continue to build “Hungarian socialism” without looking back at Moscow. Nagy chose the second option. It is difficult to say how he was guided by whether personal ambitions, the desire to prevent bloodshed, or ideological views that diverged from the line of the Soviet leadership. In any case, Imre Nagy entered history as the man who led the Budapest uprising.

At the end of October 20, on the streets of the Hungarian capital, Soviet troops entered the city on the night of October 24 — immediately after the start of the uprising. Initially, the Soviet command expected that units of the Hungarian People’s Army would help them in suppressing the demonstrations. However, on October 28, the VNA command received from the head of the government Imre Nagy an order not to intervene in the situation and not to take action against the rebels. Later, Imre Nagy spoke on the radio, announcing that the government considered the actions of the rebels as revolutionary and informing that the Hungarian People’s Army was being dissolved, and instead of it, new armed forces were being formed. At the same time, Imre Nagy ordered all members of the Communist Party, who defended the party and government institutions, to lay down weapon. In fact, this order was a real betrayal of the Hungarian communists, since many of them paid with their lives precisely because they laid down their arms - the rebels did not intend to spare them. On October 30, the Soviet leadership decided to withdraw all Soviet troops from Budapest, since in the current situation Moscow could not yet work out a clear position on how to deal with Imre Nagy and the “Hungarian revolution”.

However, it was just these days that the armed conflict began between Egypt on the one hand, England, France and Israel - on the other hand, which culminated in the Suez crisis. In the current situation, Nikita Khrushchev decided not to withdraw troops from Hungary, in order not to give the Americans and their allies a reason to doubt the military-political power of the Soviet Union. The Soviet leadership decided to create a new revolutionary workers 'and peasants' government of Hungary, headed by the pro-Soviet Janos Kadar, and the government of Imre Nagy to be overthrown. To this end, the development of a plan for Operation Whirlwind, led by USSR Defense Minister Marshal Georgy Zhukov, was launched. The plan for an armed operation to suppress the Hungarian uprising aroused the understanding and support of the leadership of other countries of the socialist camp, including even China and Yugoslavia, who at first were very friendly to the Hungarian events. The socialist countries feared that the Hungarian revolution could be a dangerous precedent for overthrowing the socialist system "from below", and the countries of the West would take advantage of it.

To participate in Operation Whirlwind, 15 tank, mechanized, rifle and aviation divisions, 2 airborne divisions (7th and 31st), a railway brigade. The total number of troops involved in the operation reached more than 60 thousand people. On November 3, Lieutenant General Petr Laschenko, commander of the Special Corps, ordered the commanders of the 2nd and 33rd Guards Mechanized Divisions and the 128th Guards Rifle Division to begin the assault on Budapest on November 4 at 05:50. Similar orders were given to subordinate units by the commanders of the 8th Mechanized Army, Lieutenant General Hamazasp Babajanyan and the commander of the 38th Combined Arms Army, Lieutenant General Haji-Umar Mamsurov. The Special Corps of General Laschenko was tasked with seizing the most important objects on the territory of Budapest, including the bridges over the Danube, the Buda Fortress, parliament buildings, the Central Committee of the VPT, the Ministry of Defense, the police department, the Nyugati and Keleti stations, the Kossuth radio station. As part of each of the three divisions that were part of the Special Corps, special detachments were formed as part of infantry battalions, reinforced by companies of paratroopers and 10-12 tanks. In each detachment there were also employees of state security agencies. Meanwhile, at 05:15 on November 4, the Szolnok radio broadcasted an official appeal by Janos Kadar to establish a Hungarian revolutionary workers 'and peasants' government to protect the republic from "fascism and reaction." Thus, Soviet troops entered Hungary at the official invitation of the workers 'and peasants' government of Janos Kadar.



Imre Nagy, who heads the government supporting the rebels, hid in the territory of the Yugoslav embassy. Soviet troops occupied Budapest for one day on November 4, demonstrating a high level of combat training. Meanwhile, in other parts of Hungary, units of the 8 th mechanized army and the 38 th combined arms army were able to neutralize almost the entire Hungarian army by disarming the 5 of the Hungarian divisions and 5 of individual regiments with a total of more than 25 thousand troops.

For the next three days, 5,6 and 7 in November, street fighting continued between the Soviet troops and certain rebel groups in the streets of the Hungarian capital. On November 7 Janos Kadar himself arrived in Budapest, who announced the transfer of power to a revolutionary workers 'and peasants' government. The resistance of the last rebel groups was suppressed on November 8. A day later, on November 10, representatives of the workers' councils of Budapest appealed to the Soviet command with a request for a cease-fire.



However, despite the fact that control over the Hungarian capital was actually transferred to the Soviet troops, and the power of the Hungarian Workers 'Party under the leadership of Janos Kadar was restored in the country, the workers' councils created during the uprising continued to exist. They continued their activities for a month, until in early December 1956 were dispersed by the Hungarian security forces. As a result of the repressive measures following the suppression of the uprising, several thousand people were arrested. It was possible to lure out of cover in the Yugoslav embassy and Imre Nagy. A trial was held over Imre Nagy, who sentenced the former head of government to death. 16 June 1958, almost two years after the uprising, the execution of its leaders took place. Imre Nagy, Colonel Pal Maleter, who was Minister of Defense in the government of Nagy and journalist Miklos Gimesh, who edited the Hungarian Freedom newspaper, were hanged.

Key leaders of the Hungarian communist movement before the 1956 year - Miklos Rakosi, Ernö Ger,, Laszlo Piros, Andre Hegedyus moved to the Soviet Union. Rakosi remained forever in the USSR, where he died in the 1971 year, after 14 years after the uprising. In 1960, ErnUM Gerö returned to Hungary, where he lived without being engaged in politics. He died in 1980 year in old age. Laszlo Pirosh, who served as Minister of the Interior until 1956, returned to Hungary in 1958, worked as a director for a salami factory and was not involved in politics. In 1958, he returned to Hungary and Andr Hegedyush - but he was no longer involved in politics, but worked as a teacher, he lived more than forty years - until 1999. Army General Mihai Farkas, who was considered the third person of the party hierarchy after Rakosi and Gerё, was arrested under Kadar and spent several years in prison until 1961, then worked in publishing and died in 1965, at the age of 61.

The suppression of 1956 speeches contributed to strengthening the position of the USSR in Eastern Europe, demonstrating Moscow’s resolute attitude. Hungary itself remained socialist for another thirty-four years, although even then an alarming signal was sent, which became a kind of rehearsal for subsequent velvet revolutions against pro-Soviet political regimes.
36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    4 November 2016 07: 07
    I will not judge who is right or who is not. I just want to note the reaction of our press and historians to such events.
    A revolution has occurred in our country. 1 MV is going on in the world. Our allies (Entente) are trying to save the previous regime, supply weapons, send military units. This is considered by Soviet history as counter-revolution, intervention and interference in the internal affairs of the country.
    Now we take Hungary (you can change the country). In the country, the people raised a "buchu" against the regime that has ruled the country for ten years (relying on Soviet bayonets). And here the Soviet Union begins an operation to save the allied regime - sends weapons, sends military units - and these are already other epithets - international assistance, the fight against counter-revolution, etc. request hi
    1. +16
      4 November 2016 07: 45
      hi And everything is very simple! We, unlike the Entente, did not plunder Hungary (you can change the country) and did not try to get hold of territories at their expense! And now we remember 1918, the Entente, the Mattress, the Japanese - how vultures rob our land, support the "democratic" choice of Poles, Finns and other Balts!
      1. 0
        5 November 2016 21: 04
        Quote: Hunter
        Entente, Mattress, Japanese - like vultures plunder our land, support the "democratic" choice of Poles, Finns and other Balts!

        and what did they loot? And the "democratic" choice of the Finns and others was first supported by the Soviet government with its decrees.
    2. +8
      4 November 2016 07: 47
      Then let's move on ... events in SYRIA ... Western countries supply the opponents of the legitimate government of SYRIA with weapons, terrorist fighters, instructor advisers, etc. and they call it all the fight of the rebels against the ASADA regime ... what hi
      1. +2
        4 November 2016 08: 59
        Quote: The same Lech
        Then let's move on ... events in SYRIA ... Western countries supply the opponents of the legitimate government of SYRIA with weapons, terrorist fighters, instructor advisers, etc. and they call it all the fight of the rebels against the ASADA regime ... what hi

        And everywhere the same faces
    3. +4
      4 November 2016 17: 53
      The intervention is also accompanied by the robbery of the occupied country, the establishment of full control over it. In the case of the 56th, Soviet intervention was limited in time, after which the military returned to their places of deployment. In addition, the times when Janos Kadar (1956-1989) stood in power in today's Hungary are remembered with nostalgia by many - full counters, imported clothes, the possibility of going abroad, coupled with free education, medicine and other social services. guarantees.
      1. +1
        5 November 2016 21: 10
        Quote: Rastas
        In the case of the 56th, Soviet intervention was limited in time, after which the military returned to their places of deployment.

        the troops then returned, and the Soviet of Deputies remained for another 35 years.
        Quote: Rastas
        In addition, the times when Janos Kadar (1956-1989) stood in power in today's Hungary are remembered with nostalgia by many

        many pensioners, the youth does not want a scoop, and
        Quote: Rastas
        full counters, imported clothes, the possibility of going abroad,
        and now there are in Hungary, only to travel abroad has become much easier.
  2. +1
    4 November 2016 08: 55
    although even then there was an alarming signal, which became a kind of rehearsal for subsequent "velvet revolutions" against pro-Soviet political regimes.
    .. That's right, thank you Ilya ...
  3. +9
    4 November 2016 09: 16
    The Hungarians, the allies of the Germans, fought poorly but were noted in the robberies and sadism. After the surrender, the Hungarians who had the experience of robbery were not destroyed, but multiplied to themselves and by 1956 had children and some grandchildren, and what could they tell about themselves? The fact that they were robbed, and for that they got * on the forehead *? There is no rising to the position of the offended at the first opportunity, they made a military coup, all the more they promised a lot of things to foreign curators, and * allies * were found in the Hungarian leadership. That's about the fact that * postants * under Nazi slogans atrocities not only against the defenders of Hungary but quite successfully robbed wealthy Hungarians today somehow * is not * accepted * to remember. Especially in Hungary itself.
    1. 2-0
      +5
      4 November 2016 11: 29
      They had to be extinguished mercilessly, so that they would be remembered forever. Tanks. The owner came to deal with the rebellious slaves !!!
      So that the Czechs, these Slovaks then think, is it worth starting or not. Ours, as usual - "humanize, kiss in the ass" ...
    2. +5
      4 November 2016 13: 49
      If Khrushchev hadn’t opened the border of Hungary with the West, having withdrawn Soviet troops from Austria in the 1955 year, then there would not have been an uprising of unfinished fascists
    3. +3
      5 November 2016 00: 01
      Quote: Vasily50
      Hungarians, allies of the Germans, fought no matter


      The Hungarians fought the best of Hitler's allies. It was said about them, "Hungarians are fighting no worse than the Germans."
  4. +4
    4 November 2016 13: 30
    fascists undeveloped rebellion raised such as Bandera on the Maidan with the support of the West and then people write an article r ..... 0
  5. +4
    4 November 2016 14: 12
    The article is politically correct in the spirit of today's situation.
    Now in Hungary, the right-wing nationalist party Jobik rules.
    Some call it fascist. The EU even threatened to expel Hungary from the EU.
    But Jobik is for Putin.
    But for Jobik, the events of 1956 are sacred. People's national revolution.
    Therefore, you curse the rebels with the Nazis - you will quarrel Russia and Hungary. recourse
    1. +2
      4 November 2016 14: 42
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Now in Hungary, the right-wing nationalist party Jobik rules.
      Some call it fascist. The EU even threatened to expel Hungary from the EU.
      But Jobik is for Putin.

      It is written - Jobbik with two letters b.
      Former Hungarian Anti-Semite Leader Repatriates to Israel
      In a few months, a new immigrant from Hungary, David (Chanad) Szegedi, will come to Israel with his family. A few years ago, he was a leading member of parliament from the anti-Semitic Jobbik party and opposed the "dominance of Jews in Hungary and world politics." But four years ago, "person number 2" in the Jobbik party, to which many predicted an undeniable leadership in the growing anti-Semitic party, found out that he was a Jew in Halacha. lol
      http://cursorinfo.co.il/news/novosti1/2016/10/09/
      bivshiy-lider-antisemitov-hungarian-repatriiruetsya
      -v-izrail /
      Hungarian trap.
    2. +4
      4 November 2016 20: 54
      Quote: voyaka uh
      But Jobik is for Putin.

      Do not make me laugh.....
      Shaw trump, scho Jobbick - everything is just for itself
      Quote: voyaka uh
      But for Jobik, the events of 1956 are sacred. People's national revolution.

      That when they cut the Soviet soldiers and officers, having rammed the rams?
  6. +1
    4 November 2016 14: 45
    Quote: voyaka uh
    Therefore, you curse the rebels with the Nazis - you will quarrel Russia and Hungary.

    Well, in general, you must first study the definition of the word fascism and then call this word events.
    Like it or not, all the countries of the eastern bloc have chosen the western development model
    1. +2
      4 November 2016 22: 08
      I also believe that socialism was not suitable for most countries of Eastern Europe. Hungarians for
      the time spent in the Austro-Hungarian Empire became a developed independent country.
      Although with strong imperial ambitions, which pushed them into a sad alliance with Hitler.
      But of course, they did not need both the Warsaw bloc and Stalinist socialism.
      1. +6
        4 November 2016 23: 49
        Quote: voyaka uh
        Hungarians for
        the time spent in the Austro-Hungarian Empire became a developed independent country.
        Although with strong imperial ambitions, which pushed them into a sad alliance with Hitler


        "Eight million beggars" called Hungary as part of Austria-Hungary, what kind of development and independence as part of Austria-Hungary, for all its duality? They were agrarians, while AV could not exist without purchasing agricultural products, and during the First World War it got into a crisis with hunger riots.

        Imperial ambitions of a country with 10 million people? In the future, get a maximum of three hundred thousand mountain villages? You have some ideas about empires ... yard.

        Now everyone remembers how they suffered under the yoke of socialism, and when they pulled loans and other supplies out of the post-war ass, and then they provided guaranteed and planned orders for many years ahead at prices above world prices, they did not whine much. That is what flourished in the free market, the great Magyar.
        1. +1
          5 November 2016 00: 08
          I was in Hungary in 1990. "Scoop", wretchedness, dullness.
          And it was two years ago. The beauty.
          1. +1
            5 November 2016 00: 33
            Twenty-six years of difference. Clearly compared, it’s good that not with the year 1890.

            Under the communists there were no mobile phones!
            And HDTV!
            Democracy has given computers! And social networks!

            Not just because the Hungarians mow to exit the EU. The reason for the migrants, but in reality people who see further the cafe and evaluate the country not by the color of the facades, understand the prospects.

            So what about Hungarian imperialism?
            1. +2
              5 November 2016 00: 58
              "Twenty-six years difference." ////

              Just enough time to transfer the country to new tracks.

              What surprised you about imperialism? Hungary was a warlike kingdom
              in the Middle Ages. And their nationalists, it rises to the shield.
              I hope you know that Portugal was pretty tiny
              a long wealthy empire with flourishing colonies around the world.
              You have some kind of ... football idea of ​​empires. If the field is large -
              empire. Even if it is 70% of permafrost. wink
              1. +2
                5 November 2016 03: 07
                Well, they talked about Hungary as part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, and came to the medieval warlike kingdom in the Middle Ages, "And their nationalists, it rises on the shield." Some nationalists rise to the shield of the case of two thousand years ago and the claims are justified by an agreement with God, well, smile, well there.
                Blabber, so have the courage to admit.
                So Portugal you hit.
                Quote: voyaka uh
                I hope you know that Portugal, tiny in territory, has been a rich empire for quite some time with prosperous colonies all over the world.

                You didn’t even hear a ringing, but an echo of a ringing.
                Thriving colonies, yeah. The rich empire of Portugal ... Listen, why do you always go into business with such aplomb where you know nothing?

                But here with Hungary - new rails; Soviet terminology sits firmly in you. Subtract twenty-six years from 1990 - you will end up in 1964. The difference since 1990 is huge, progress is not worth it, and the war is farther and farther. But twenty-six years from 1990 to 2016 - informatization of the economy, robotization, globalization - everyone - but here, panmash, got rid of the scoop, rivers and milk and honey flowed onto new rails and flowed. And so confidently broadcast ...
                1. +1
                  5 November 2016 20: 46
                  "Listen, why are you all the time getting into business with such aplomb, where you don't know anything" ////

                  Jews, as you know, answer the question with a question. smile
                  Listen, why are you, like a hungry little dog, following me on the site
                  and comment on my posts?
                  I do not touch your gray little uninteresting posts. Peach, let's get out?
                  fellow
              2. +1
                5 November 2016 09: 05
                ... permafrost is permafrost, and the difference in imperial politics between Portugal and Russia is enormous. Well, it's not a sin not to know these basics. Especially: about "prosperous colonies around the world." Yeah, "pearl pearls" ...
          2. +1
            5 November 2016 09: 02
            ... served in Hungary from 1985 to 1990. I do not agree with your statements: scoop, wretchedness, dullness. Something more drawn to your self-esteem. Well, your people have their own prism of attitude ...
            1. 0
              5 November 2016 20: 40
              Everything is relative, of course. I then moved from Austria in the 90th by car
              to Hungary. Well, I was in shock. The contrast was sharp.
              And now Hungary has risen.
              1. 0
                6 November 2016 13: 30
                ... she lived well in Soviet times. An order of magnitude better than us. For our bayonets and help ...
                1. 0
                  6 November 2016 18: 05
                  "She lived well in Soviet times. She's an order of magnitude better than us" ////

                  Well, that turned out. You compare it with the USSR, and I with Austria.
                  Therefore, we got such a difference in estimates.
                  1. +2
                    20 November 2016 12: 04
                    ... if you follow your style, then, probably, there are more rags - there are more rags, you should give as much as you want. In my opinion, so where is the Chepel metallurgical plant, the Ikarus plant and other industries now? In the opera ... Therefore, such a difference in assessments. For the current period of Euro-Atlantic integration ...
        2. +1
          6 November 2016 00: 01
          During the time of Austria-Hungary, the Kingdom of Hungary included Slovakia, Transcarpathia, a significant part of present-day Romania (Transylvania), most of present-day Croatia (Croatia and Slavonia, enjoyed fairly broad autonomy), as well as Fiume. The population was by no means ten million.
  7. +2
    4 November 2016 21: 14
    Blah blah blah. The whole article about the fact that the Communists are bad! And shit-democratizers are good! Comrade Stalin, where are you?
    1. +1
      5 November 2016 21: 17
      Quote: burigaz2010
      Stalin ovary Well, where are you?

      another masochist
      1. 0
        6 November 2016 00: 47
        Do you have something against Comrade Stalin ??? And probably he personally offended you in childhood?
  8. 0
    16 March 2017 12: 04
    the first experience of the CIA, the Bundesabwehr and MI5 in organizing an uprising in "... in a class-unstable society"
  9. +1
    27 March 2017 13: 08
    Hungarians “excelled” in Voronezh. The brutal reprisals against civilians and prisoners, they surprised even the Germans. In 1956, the unfinished fascists again tried to raise their heads. The authorities of the USSR did everything right.