Urgently needed shock drones MQ-47B

24


According to the leadership of the United States Navy, they urgently need unmanned combat air systems (Unmanned Combat Air System, UCAS) for deployment on their aircraft carriers. The current plan includes the adoption of such systems for six years. Despite this, considerable efforts are being made to get them as soon as possible. The reason is that today for the effective use of bomber aviation US aircraft carriers must approach a distance of 800 kilometers from their target. Potential adversaries increasingly have airplanes and missiles with a range exceeding 800 kilometers. According to the leadership of the naval forces, the solution to this problem will be an unmanned aerial vehicle X-47B UCAS, with a flight range of 2500 kilometers.

Last year, the US Navy also ordered the Naval Aviation Command to consider reducing orders for the new F-35B and F-35C manned aircraft, and use the savings to purchase new X-47B and similar combat aircraft. robots. The Navy currently plans to purchase 680 F-35Bs and F-35Cs at an average of $100 million each. UCAS (Unmanned Air Combat System) costs half as much, while still providing the same capabilities, as well as greater range.



For most of the last decade, the naval forces hastily prepared to deploy UCAS on aircraft carriers and their combat use. Over the next four years, the Navy wants to be able to regularly use X-47B from the deck of an aircraft carrier and carry out combat operations (including reconnaissance and surveillance). It is assumed that UCAS will be able to perform at least the same assault tasks performed by the Predator UAV for more than a decade. Large-sized UAVs The Reaper was designed to expand these combat abilities. It should enter service as soon as possible in order to replace F-16 and other manned aircraft in the combat zone.

Urgently needed shock drones MQ-47B


The X-47B weighs 20 tons, it is slightly smaller than the 24-ton F-18A. It has two internal compartments to accommodate about two tons of smart bombs. As soon as X-47B can operate from the deck of an aircraft carrier, it will be used for bombardment, acting in a kind of super-Reaper role. The naval forces were satisfied with the successful use of the Predator and the Reaper, despite the fact that the Reaper weighs only 4.7 tons. The much larger X-47B is equipped with an F100-PW-220 engine currently used on the F-16 and F-15.



Two years have passed since the US Navy presented its first combat X-47B UAV (now known as UCAS), created as part of a six-year $ 636 million contract. Without refueling, the device has a range of 2700 kilometers. Among other things, it significantly expands the intelligence capabilities of the aircraft carrier.



Seven years ago, he made his first flight of smaller-sized UAVs X-47A UCAS, the development of which began in the 2001 year. The Air Force is also developing the X-45 UCAS UAV, which has a maritime version (X-46). The X-45 development program began in 1999, and in 2006, the eight-ton (maximum take-off weight with two tons of payload) unit was ready for flight tests. The X-46 has a different wing layout and range in 1100 km with a payload of up to two tons. The X-47A also carries two tons of payload at a range of 1600 kilometers. Unlike the X-45, which was built for storage over a long period, the X-47А was built for active use from the deck of an aircraft carrier. All these devices have low radar visibility and are able to operate completely independently (including landing and take-off) in accordance with the program established. Initially, UCAS were designed for dangerous operations, such as the destruction of enemy air defense, reconnaissance in conditions of strong air defense of the enemy. However, the Air Force has closed the project X-45 and is currently considering other options for UCAS.



The Air Force and the US Navy have always differed in their views on the widespread use of unmanned aerial vehicles in combat. Ten years ago, when the Air Force agreed to cooperate with the Navy in the UCAS project, the concept of the Air Force largely involved placing combat UAVs in reserve in order to use them quickly in wartime. The Navy, in turn, would like to use them to replace manned aircraft on aircraft carriers for one simple reason - military operations from the aircraft carrier are very dangerous, and the training of qualified deck pilots is difficult and expensive. In this regard, the Navy leadership believes that UCAS is the future of carrier-based aviation. Thus, the sooner UCAS can prove that they are able to operate safely and effectively from the deck of an aircraft carrier, the better. Although the X-47B (or a slightly larger planned X-47C) is not specifically created by UCAS for aircraft carriers, the Navy hopes that they will be sufficiently effective to demonstrate the ability of unmanned systems to perform their intended tasks. As a rule, airplanes with the index "X" are used as prototypes for testing technologies. Despite this, the X-47 program has been going on for so long and has absorbed so much from the UAVs already used in battle that, eventually, X-47B will be able to perform reconnaissance and bombing tasks, like MQ-47B.



In essence, the DARPA project of the Ministry of Defense should meet the plans of the naval leadership and encourage catch-up of the air force lag. At present, the Air Force is struggling to produce a sufficient amount of MQ-9, used as a ground support aircraft in addition to reconnaissance and surveillance. But, as the Navy demonstrates, it is possible to build a UCAS capable of carrying more weapons, stay longer in the air and quickly appear where they are needed most. DARPA will try to demonstrate this with the help of the Air Force and Navy.


24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    19 January 2012 07: 21
    After reading the article, especially its beginning, we can conclude that Pindos are afraid of their opponent in view of the appearance of long-range missiles in them. Accepting UAVs for Pindos will be ineffective if their opponent has electronic suppression systems (and I hope so). that such systems are at a high stage of development, so UAVs are not afraid of us.
    1. +3
      19 January 2012 11: 31
      . The adoption of UAVs for Pindos will not be very effective if their adversary has electronic suppression systems.

      It pleases me that we have such systems at a high stage of development, so UAVs are not afraid of us.


      Not certainly in that way. Such systems do not need a communication channel with the operator, but can work absolutely autonomously, including takeoff and landing. And even the presence of GPS is not necessary for them (like the tomahawk of the 90's, navigation through the stored photos of the area and the inertial system).
  2. +7
    19 January 2012 09: 33
    Currently, the US industry produces a large number of prototypes of robots for various purposes. By the 2030s US Army robotics are planned at 30%, however, according to some estimates by American experts (2008), this level of robotics can be expected by 2020, which indicates increased attention in the United States to this area (the United States accounts for up to 75 % of global R&D costs and up to 60% of the purchase costs of UAV systems - unmanned aerial vehicles).
    In the medium term (2009-2013), US government spending on developing military robots and equipping them with an army is projected to be $ 18,9 billion. It is expected that of them the main part (about 82%) will be intended for the segment of air robots (UAVs), 13,7% - for the segment of ground-based and 4,3% - for the segment of marine robotic systems. It should be noted that in general, the market of US military robots shows a significant excess of demand over the supply of a number of the most modern types of equipment, for example, the strategic shock UAV Repear worth $ 12 billion, including from customers from other countries, etc. d.
    T.O. The Pendos strategy is being implemented to maximize the elimination of the human factor in the lower and middle link of combat use and control. The army is hired without money for the idea of ​​world domination.
    will not fight plus casualties causing discontent within the country. There are two ways:
    1. Total military superiority over the whole world
    2. Maximum army automation and robotization
  3. +1
    19 January 2012 09: 54
    The video was impressive ....
    Say what you like, but the Americans have progress in the development of UAVs.
  4. NUT
    NUT
    +8
    19 January 2012 12: 54
    the larger the robot, the more likely it is that once

    At a Russian language lesson, a sixth-grader Petrov opened the Pentagon server from his mobile phone and, with his schoolmate, Sidorov, played a naval battle with the US Navy. As a result, Petrov and Sidorov received deuces for their behavior, and the United States lost the Navy ...
  5. 755962
    +4
    19 January 2012 12: 55
    Military operations conducted on board an aircraft carrier are very dangerous, and the training of qualified deck pilots is a difficult and expensive task. After evaluating the ratio of the UAV and the current pilot + airplane combination + pilot training, the advantage is on the drone's side. Human life is more expensive.
  6. +1
    19 January 2012 16: 27
    Apparently, the speed of this X-47B UAV is not large. It will be possible to use such a machine only in local conflicts.
    1. 0
      19 January 2012 16: 32
      The 0.45 Mach cruising speed is pretty decent for a bomber.
      1. 0
        19 January 2012 16: 41
        But can he attack the target?
        1. 0
          19 January 2012 16: 50
          "on your own"?
          He acts according to the established program - flew in, bombed, flew away. He should not conduct air battles of IHMO.
          1. +1
            19 January 2012 17: 59
            It turns out he goes where there are no air defense and fighter jets?
            After all, he cannot even go with accompaniment if the algorithm is laid down initially, and in case of counteraction it will be necessary to somehow correct the plans. But then it should cost cheaply, and $ 50 million for a plane moving in a straight line to a point that unfolds and in a straight back IMHO only against natives
            1. -1
              19 January 2012 18: 57
              It turns out he goes where there are no air defense and fighter jets?

              On the contrary, it was created to work with strong anti-aircraft defense.
              The algorithm may include action in different scenarios. I repeat, GPS is not necessary for him.

              IMHO only against the natives

              As practice shows, against the natives there are enough Traitors and Co.
              This papelac is built against advanced users like Iran. For nuclear Russia, no drones pose a threat.
              1. 0
                19 January 2012 19: 29
                Well, Russia is not only nuclear
                1. 0
                  19 January 2012 19: 39
                  Well then, there’s nothing to be afraid of. fellow
                  1. +1
                    19 January 2012 20: 28
                    never scary - interesting
  7. coast
    -2
    19 January 2012 18: 09
    probably it will still be operated on gps, and so the bird
    1. 0
      19 January 2012 18: 58
      the professor says complete silence on the air, and if there is zhipies, then this bird doesn’t like electronic warfare
      1. 0
        19 January 2012 19: 06
        Tomahawk also has GPS, but only as an auxiliary navigation subsystem. And he is not afraid of any electronic warfare. sad
        1. Stealth
          -3
          21 January 2012 01: 50
          But he is afraid of the complex application of electronic warfare and optical-electronic suppression. For example, to protect against such missiles in Russia, the Gazetchik complex has been developed, which interferes with all existing types of GOS. So protection now exists from everything, but what will be more effective is the eternal dispute between the sword and the shield.
  8. +1
    19 January 2012 18: 28
    if some people know how to make offensive weapons, then the opposite side should be able to make defensive weapons who we are now and, in particular, due to their geographical location
    1. 0
      19 January 2012 19: 04
      Defense has not won a single war, there must be both
  9. -1
    19 January 2012 21: 38
    Tell the professor, then how did the Iranians of Sentinel plant, if you say that he does not need a communication channel. Just because of this I think and put it! What can I say? I’m interested in your opinion ...
    I generally heard about the Chinese that some missiles were developed by them, and maybe even developed with EMP! Then no UAVs are scary. The impulse and bye bye ... They get there.
    1. 0
      19 January 2012 23: 49
      IHMO The Iranians did not plant anyone; he fell. Read in one of the articles I posted what accident the first UAVs had.
      I remember there was a case when a Soviet fighter, in my opinion Mig-23, flew through Europe without a pilot. I mean, equipment failures happen. Even Kalash sometimes wedges ...
      In order to land an American UAV, the Iranians needed to do the following:
      1. To detect at what frequencies control is in progress (for example, the Americans relaxed and did not jump in a pseudorandom order from frequency to frequency)
      2. Decipher control codes (understand their "purpose" among ones and zeros). Simple Skype and the FSB, or the Chinese special services could not decipher ... tongue
      3. To hammer the signal coming from the satellite to the UAV located at an altitude of 10 km with a signal coming from a completely different direction, from the ground.
      4. Finally, decipher the military GPS signal and "replace" it with a false signal, and from at least four sources synchronized at the atomic clock level.

      I believe that the Iranians landed that UAV when they repeat their feat.
      1. Stealth
        -2
        21 January 2012 02: 00
        1. For this, the Iranians had an "Autobase".
        2. Shortly before this incident, there was news that a virus was found on the American base from where all drones are controlled, which tracks keystrokes on the keyboard, i.e. if I’m not mistaken, using this virus it was quite possible to get access and control codes.
        3. For this there are electronic warfare equipment, for example, the Russian automated jamming station R-330Zh "Zhitel".
        4. Why decrypt the signal, if you can simply copy it, again using RTR, then hammer the real signal from a powerful ground source to cut the copied one.
        In general, IMHO, there is nothing fundamentally impracticable here, apparently the Iranians were well prepared, and they were also probably helped by the intelligence of more powerful countries (the Russian Federation’s MB or China).
        1. +1
          21 January 2012 11: 41
          1. The carpool intercepted the encrypted signal, then what? Over Skype, intercept as much as you want - they could not decrypt.
          2. In order for this virus to work, you need to connect the control station to the Internet. Do you think the CIA secret UAV control station in Afghanistan !!! (not sure how he wasn’t controlled by predators from Arizona) was connected to the Internet? Like operators sat in parallel in Odnoklassniki ... wink
          3. Theoretically, it is practically a very difficult task.
          4. Copy, then re-enable the copied? What's the point? The UAV will do the same, but with a delay.

          In general, IMHO, there is nothing fundamentally impracticable here, apparently the Iranians were well prepared, and they were also probably helped by the intelligence of more powerful countries (the Russian Federation’s MB or China).

          Let's arm ourselves with patience and watch how Iranians pack American UAVs in batches. fellow However, something tells me that this will not happen and not because the American drones stopped flying over Iran
  10. Jupiter
    0
    19 January 2012 22: 31
    I wonder how much the X-47B will fit on board the AB type Nimitz, if they replace all the manned aircraft?
  11. 0
    20 January 2012 12: 40
    The US launched a satellite that will provide communications with UAVs in the Middle East and Central Asia
    On Thursday evening, January 19, a Delta 4 launch vehicle was launched from Cape Canaveral, which launched the WGS 4 satellite into low Earth orbit. This satellite, the Pentagon claims, will provide communications with unmanned aerial vehicles that the US Army will use in the Middle East and Central Asia.