A few words about Stalin and his place in the history of Russia
The last year there are such events that you want to express yourself. So I am here a little bit naughty, and you really do not judge strictly. Or judge, but this is the opinion.
So it turns out that I am not a monarchist, not a Communist, so, from the side of the stool. But I’m not only eating into my head, and therefore I can quite make a couple of conclusions and state them quite clearly. Compared with Klitschko - and in general a genius in kind.
What, exactly, so excited me to write this opinion? And they prompted historical events, renaming, discoveries, and so on.
They gave the name Akhmat Kadyrov to St. Petersburg bridge. Well, gave - well. Kadyrov Sr. - a uniquely unique person, though utterly controversial. But the beginning of the end of the war put, definitely for a good cause died. And it is wonderful that the son continued the work and actually completed it. How and at what price is a completely different matter, which is a bit early to touch. Here the result is important. The result is that the Russians stopped dying in Chechnya, and at least for that both Kadyrov’s gratitude and appreciation.
We go further. We drank the center of memory of Boris The money was obviously more painful than the name of the Kadyrov bridge. Question: why? Evaluating the activities of this “figure” today, the only decent thing he did in two of his terms was to dump Putin and put him in his place. The rest, I'm sorry, you know. A sort of king Midas contrary. That one touched, turned into gold, well, and Borisok ...
And what are they broadcasting in this center, if you believe Mikhalkov (and I believe)? The fact that only under Yeltsin, Russia got rid of the shackles of slavery and found freedom. Well, I do not know what freedom we were then presented on a silver platter. As for me, so is the freedom to be deceived, swindled, and so on. From government officials to thousands of businessmen and businessmen who suddenly appear.
However, the center was rebuilt, the foundation of the name of the eternally booted president is working, everything is fine. They canonized, in general.
By the way, to the question of canonization. I am not in church terms. I'm in the mundane. Although the church can touch.
Take the same Nikolai Romanov, the latter. Now - the holy martyr Nikolai Romanov. That the martyr will not argue. About holiness, not sure at all. Here, by definition, everything is clear.
Holy is a person, especially honored in various religions for holiness, piety, righteousness, steadfast confession of faith, intercession before God for people.
A Muchenik is a person who is being persecuted and / or has died for denying, preaching, or refusing to renounce his religious or secular views. Most martyrs are worshiped by followers or even considered holy, becoming a symbol of heroism and courage.
And where is Romanov? Where is his holiness? You can also keep silent about secular affairs, but one war would be successfully lost, you would lose the second one, and managed to merge the whole country to a handful of Bolsheviks, quite a Jewish bottling.
But - the holy martyr. Galling (by definition). Although the year 1905 might have improved the question differently. Although what's the difference now?
In general, who wants to honor - no problem. Even with distortions. Even if it is impossible for a statesman to go with a portrait of Romanov to a march in honor of our victorious warriors in the Great Patriotic War is also not a question. Everyone is crazy about Russia from time immemorial.
But like this, we have canonization. Crooked, if for me.
And speaking of holiness, it’s still necessary to figure out who is holier, loser-king, who lost the country, president-loser, who miraculously did not lose (yes, they are similar, fact) or private Ivanov, who died in the morning of 22 June 1941. Or Sergeant Petrov, the last war and who died during the assault on the Reichstag 30 in April 1945.
The question, of course, difficult. Although I personally gave him an answer to it, and gave it for quite some time.
But back to the point for which everything started.
Definitely today the pendulum stories swung the other way. Democratic mold and Western ideals are slowly beginning to be removed from organisms by natural means. Spoiled, so to speak.
And, as Joseph Vissarionovich predicted in his time, the wind of history will blow garbage from the graves. Well, not blown away, but blows away slowly. Museum in the Tver region, a monument in the Mari ...
The call to repentance in our country is not a new matter. We were very often called upon to repent before the whole world. Behind the ruined Poles, Germans, Western Ukrainians, Balts ... Sometimes it seemed that we were guilty in a crowd before the whole world.
It seems to me that it is time to repent to a single person. A person who dragged the terrible eeriness of that war on his shoulders and, I emphasize separately, left nothing behind. No centers, no funds, no accounts in banks abroad.
For me personally, the history of the Stalin Prize is indicative. Yes, she was small. Not like Lenin, which paid the CPSU, and especially the State. The prize went entirely from Stalin's pocket. From his fees for published materials (including abroad) and from the salary. Indeed, why should the salary of a person sitting on two posts and being on state support?
And the prize was given not as a Nobel Prize. And for the specific case in the field of science, technology and art. Today it is necessary to suffer the Internet weakly in order to understand who and for what got this unfortunate Nobel Prize.
And the "Stalin"? A record holder, a seven-time winner, Sergey Ilyushin, needs internet surfing? And sixfold? Prokofiev (composer), Yakovlev, Mikoyan, Gurevich, Simonov (writer). Nobel (later) Kapitsa laureates (twice) and Lurie (three times).
Now, of course, those who have a bearded Solzhenitsker instead of an icon hanging on a wall instead of an icon, will curse in bad voices. What about repression? In which 100 killed millions of people? How about them?
Well, I once heard enough of this demobilization so much that I developed immunity, that the armor of the battleship. From the groans of the crunch of the French loaf to the fact that under Hitler we would all live in Germany today and drive a Mercedes.
Yes, would not live exactly. This is understandable today, thank God, to all normal people. Slaughtered everyone, leaving as much as needed to meet in the labor force. This is also common knowledge. They repressed - yes, and in my relatives there were both those who stayed and did not return. But, as a person who is well aware of the history of his family, I can see that two of the relatives did not return from the camps, and the front took 28. My great-grandfather had a 11 in the family, of course, where such figures come from. Plus about two hundred more Leningraders. Three branches lived there, one person survived the blockade.
What is the point? The essence of all this is that we historically need symbols and examples. And with this apparent bias. Therefore, in life, everything is not smooth in the country. Not those landmarks. Not yet. Need to change.
And it is best to start with the nearest. From the nearest. From a person whose name is really bypassed, although his service to the country is enormous. Invaluable? Maybe. So, we must evaluate. And give merit.
It seems to me that this, too, is all from the evil one. That is, from the enemy of our common. Imposing in the form of moral and moral examples of people who are not in any way. That Yeltsin, to whom the West turned, as he wanted, through his merchants, that Romanov, who is also not without sin in this regard. But they have one thing in common: they did not do anything for the good of the country.
But those who really built a great country, it does not matter, Russia or the USSR, for some reason, it is quietly accepted to bypass. Why? Yes, probably because. No one needs a strong Russia. Moreover, it is dangerous.
Did Stalin build a great union? Built by And built. And from the Romanov dynasty, I will also give an example. The father of the unfortunate king, Alexander the Third. Who would argue that under Alexander the Peacemaker Russia did not soar to the highest level of the political Olympus, he simply does not know the history. And the economic recovery was unprecedented.
In order for Russia to truly become the Russia that the whole world is looking at in the future, it is necessary to change priorities. First in the heads. Then in the ranks. It is necessary to clean. Yes, today the process is already running. We must continue. Fight for the concepts in their heads, and for making decisions on the ground. Need to say why?
Because it is vital that both through 10 and 50 in years there are enough people in Russia who think not only about their account in a Swiss bank. Which will delight in Stalin, and not in Yeltsin. And you need to learn your future today. Although actually it was necessary the day before yesterday, but this is all in Russian. Fine.
But it is necessary to learn by examples of strong people, which in our history abound. Including it is necessary to finally remove the historical garbage from the grave of Stalin.
Then there will be Russia. Strong and strong.
In our time, it is not customary to reckon with the weak - they are only considered strong.
(J. V. Stalin, "Report to the XVII Congress of the Party on the Work of the Central Committee of the CPSU (B.)" T.13, page.302.)
So it turns out that I am not a monarchist, not a Communist, so, from the side of the stool. But I’m not only eating into my head, and therefore I can quite make a couple of conclusions and state them quite clearly. Compared with Klitschko - and in general a genius in kind.
What, exactly, so excited me to write this opinion? And they prompted historical events, renaming, discoveries, and so on.
They gave the name Akhmat Kadyrov to St. Petersburg bridge. Well, gave - well. Kadyrov Sr. - a uniquely unique person, though utterly controversial. But the beginning of the end of the war put, definitely for a good cause died. And it is wonderful that the son continued the work and actually completed it. How and at what price is a completely different matter, which is a bit early to touch. Here the result is important. The result is that the Russians stopped dying in Chechnya, and at least for that both Kadyrov’s gratitude and appreciation.
We go further. We drank the center of memory of Boris The money was obviously more painful than the name of the Kadyrov bridge. Question: why? Evaluating the activities of this “figure” today, the only decent thing he did in two of his terms was to dump Putin and put him in his place. The rest, I'm sorry, you know. A sort of king Midas contrary. That one touched, turned into gold, well, and Borisok ...
And what are they broadcasting in this center, if you believe Mikhalkov (and I believe)? The fact that only under Yeltsin, Russia got rid of the shackles of slavery and found freedom. Well, I do not know what freedom we were then presented on a silver platter. As for me, so is the freedom to be deceived, swindled, and so on. From government officials to thousands of businessmen and businessmen who suddenly appear.
However, the center was rebuilt, the foundation of the name of the eternally booted president is working, everything is fine. They canonized, in general.
By the way, to the question of canonization. I am not in church terms. I'm in the mundane. Although the church can touch.
Take the same Nikolai Romanov, the latter. Now - the holy martyr Nikolai Romanov. That the martyr will not argue. About holiness, not sure at all. Here, by definition, everything is clear.
Holy is a person, especially honored in various religions for holiness, piety, righteousness, steadfast confession of faith, intercession before God for people.
A Muchenik is a person who is being persecuted and / or has died for denying, preaching, or refusing to renounce his religious or secular views. Most martyrs are worshiped by followers or even considered holy, becoming a symbol of heroism and courage.
And where is Romanov? Where is his holiness? You can also keep silent about secular affairs, but one war would be successfully lost, you would lose the second one, and managed to merge the whole country to a handful of Bolsheviks, quite a Jewish bottling.
But - the holy martyr. Galling (by definition). Although the year 1905 might have improved the question differently. Although what's the difference now?
In general, who wants to honor - no problem. Even with distortions. Even if it is impossible for a statesman to go with a portrait of Romanov to a march in honor of our victorious warriors in the Great Patriotic War is also not a question. Everyone is crazy about Russia from time immemorial.
But like this, we have canonization. Crooked, if for me.
And speaking of holiness, it’s still necessary to figure out who is holier, loser-king, who lost the country, president-loser, who miraculously did not lose (yes, they are similar, fact) or private Ivanov, who died in the morning of 22 June 1941. Or Sergeant Petrov, the last war and who died during the assault on the Reichstag 30 in April 1945.
The question, of course, difficult. Although I personally gave him an answer to it, and gave it for quite some time.
But back to the point for which everything started.
Definitely today the pendulum stories swung the other way. Democratic mold and Western ideals are slowly beginning to be removed from organisms by natural means. Spoiled, so to speak.
And, as Joseph Vissarionovich predicted in his time, the wind of history will blow garbage from the graves. Well, not blown away, but blows away slowly. Museum in the Tver region, a monument in the Mari ...
The call to repentance in our country is not a new matter. We were very often called upon to repent before the whole world. Behind the ruined Poles, Germans, Western Ukrainians, Balts ... Sometimes it seemed that we were guilty in a crowd before the whole world.
It seems to me that it is time to repent to a single person. A person who dragged the terrible eeriness of that war on his shoulders and, I emphasize separately, left nothing behind. No centers, no funds, no accounts in banks abroad.
For me personally, the history of the Stalin Prize is indicative. Yes, she was small. Not like Lenin, which paid the CPSU, and especially the State. The prize went entirely from Stalin's pocket. From his fees for published materials (including abroad) and from the salary. Indeed, why should the salary of a person sitting on two posts and being on state support?
And the prize was given not as a Nobel Prize. And for the specific case in the field of science, technology and art. Today it is necessary to suffer the Internet weakly in order to understand who and for what got this unfortunate Nobel Prize.
And the "Stalin"? A record holder, a seven-time winner, Sergey Ilyushin, needs internet surfing? And sixfold? Prokofiev (composer), Yakovlev, Mikoyan, Gurevich, Simonov (writer). Nobel (later) Kapitsa laureates (twice) and Lurie (three times).
Now, of course, those who have a bearded Solzhenitsker instead of an icon hanging on a wall instead of an icon, will curse in bad voices. What about repression? In which 100 killed millions of people? How about them?
Well, I once heard enough of this demobilization so much that I developed immunity, that the armor of the battleship. From the groans of the crunch of the French loaf to the fact that under Hitler we would all live in Germany today and drive a Mercedes.
Yes, would not live exactly. This is understandable today, thank God, to all normal people. Slaughtered everyone, leaving as much as needed to meet in the labor force. This is also common knowledge. They repressed - yes, and in my relatives there were both those who stayed and did not return. But, as a person who is well aware of the history of his family, I can see that two of the relatives did not return from the camps, and the front took 28. My great-grandfather had a 11 in the family, of course, where such figures come from. Plus about two hundred more Leningraders. Three branches lived there, one person survived the blockade.
What is the point? The essence of all this is that we historically need symbols and examples. And with this apparent bias. Therefore, in life, everything is not smooth in the country. Not those landmarks. Not yet. Need to change.
And it is best to start with the nearest. From the nearest. From a person whose name is really bypassed, although his service to the country is enormous. Invaluable? Maybe. So, we must evaluate. And give merit.
It seems to me that this, too, is all from the evil one. That is, from the enemy of our common. Imposing in the form of moral and moral examples of people who are not in any way. That Yeltsin, to whom the West turned, as he wanted, through his merchants, that Romanov, who is also not without sin in this regard. But they have one thing in common: they did not do anything for the good of the country.
But those who really built a great country, it does not matter, Russia or the USSR, for some reason, it is quietly accepted to bypass. Why? Yes, probably because. No one needs a strong Russia. Moreover, it is dangerous.
Did Stalin build a great union? Built by And built. And from the Romanov dynasty, I will also give an example. The father of the unfortunate king, Alexander the Third. Who would argue that under Alexander the Peacemaker Russia did not soar to the highest level of the political Olympus, he simply does not know the history. And the economic recovery was unprecedented.
In order for Russia to truly become the Russia that the whole world is looking at in the future, it is necessary to change priorities. First in the heads. Then in the ranks. It is necessary to clean. Yes, today the process is already running. We must continue. Fight for the concepts in their heads, and for making decisions on the ground. Need to say why?
Because it is vital that both through 10 and 50 in years there are enough people in Russia who think not only about their account in a Swiss bank. Which will delight in Stalin, and not in Yeltsin. And you need to learn your future today. Although actually it was necessary the day before yesterday, but this is all in Russian. Fine.
But it is necessary to learn by examples of strong people, which in our history abound. Including it is necessary to finally remove the historical garbage from the grave of Stalin.
Then there will be Russia. Strong and strong.
In our time, it is not customary to reckon with the weak - they are only considered strong.
(J. V. Stalin, "Report to the XVII Congress of the Party on the Work of the Central Committee of the CPSU (B.)" T.13, page.302.)
Information